Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, July 2007, p. 7300-7305, Vol. 81, No. 13
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02406-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institute of Molecular Immunology, Clinical Cooperation Group Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Munich, Germany,1 Department of Medicine III, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany,2 Max von Pettenkofer-Institute, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany3
Received 2 November 2006/ Accepted 6 April 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
To evaluate the impact of the reported oriLyt, we generated a mutant genome with a deletion in its essential part, using an MHV-68 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) (1). We generated this BAC mutant (mutant A) (Table 1) lacking nucleotide positions 101,530 to 101,731 by a two-step replacement procedure which does not leave behind any foreign sequence (3, 13). For this purpose, the HindIII D fragment of MHV-68 (9) was cloned into the shuttle plasmid pST76K-SR. Subsequently, nucleotides 101,530 to 101,731 were removed from this fragment by digestion with SfiI and BspEI, followed by blunting of the ends and religation. Surprisingly, we were able to reconstitute a mutant virus which was only slightly attenuated. This finding suggested the presence of a second oriLyt in MHV-68.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. MHV-68 BACs used in this study
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Generation of MHV-68 oriLyt mutants. (A) Scheme of the mutants generated. "P" indicates the probes used for Southern blot analysis, corresponding to nucleotides 25,097 to 25,833 (P1), 101,141 to 102,045 (P2), and 101,443 to 102,699 (P3). (B) Restriction enzyme and Southern blot analyses of BAC DNAs digested with the restriction enzyme SacI and hybridized with probes P1 and P2. (C) Restriction enzyme and Southern blot analyses of BAC DNAs digested with the restriction enzyme KpnI and hybridized with probe P1. (D) Restriction enzyme and Southern blot analyses of BAC DNAs digested with the restriction enzyme BglII and hybridized with probe P3. Lanes P and A to E, parental and mutant BACs, as indicated in panel A and Table 1. The expected fragments are indicated by arrows on the right. Marker (M) sizes (in kilobase pairs) are indicated on the left.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Kinetics of GFP expression after transfection of permissive BHK-21 cells with BAC DNAs of different mutants. Cells were transfected with 2 µg of BAC DNA. At the indicated time points, cells were harvested and passaged. A part of the harvested cells was used to determine the number of GFP-positive cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. Since there was a dilution effect due to passaging of the cells, the numbers of GFP-positive cells in some samples dropped temporarily below the detection limit, followed by their reappearance after virus replication reached an appropriate extent. Recombinant viruses could be reconstituted, as determined by increasing numbers of GFP-positive cells in the cultures, from all BAC-cloned genomes except for the double deletion mutant E. The asterisks indicate the time points when the particular cell cultures were stopped due to massive viral cytopathic effects. The dashed line indicates the detection limit, which was defined on the basis of the background fluorescence of untransfected BHK-21 cells. Below this limit, it is not possible to differentiate between specific and unspecific fluorescence. The pictogram schematically illustrates the mutants investigated. Data shown are from a representative experiment which was repeated twice with similar results.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Multistep growth properties of MHV-68 mutants. NIH 3T3 cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01 at 37°C. After 1 h of adsorption at 37°C, the inoculum was removed and fresh medium was added. Cells and supernatants were harvested at the indicated time points, and viral titers were determined by plaque assay. The pictogram schematically illustrates the mutants investigated. Data shown are mean values compiled from up to three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Kinetics of GFP expression after cotransfection of permissive BHK-21 cells. (A) Cells were transfected with 2 µg of BAC DNA of the double deletion mutant E, the double deletion mutant D, or the single deletion mutant A and, in cases of cotransfections, were additionally transfected with 4 µg of plasmid DNA carrying an unmutated genomic fragment spanning the mutated region. Cotransfection with either one or both such plasmids led to the reconstitution of infectious virus, as determined by an increase in the number of GFP-positive cells over timer after transfection. At the indicated times, cells were harvested and passaged. A part of the harvested cells was used to determine the number of GFP-positive cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis. The asterisks indicate the times when the particular cell cultures were stopped due to massive viral cytopathic effects. The dashed line indicates the detection limit, which was defined on the basis of the background fluorescence of untransfected BHK-21 cells. The pictogram schematically illustrates the mutants investigated, with the unmutated genomic fragments used for cotransfections represented as light and dark gray bars. Data shown are from a representative experiment which was repeated once with similar results. (B) (Top) PCR strategy to determine the presence or absence of either the wt or mutated genomic fragment in the genomes of the reconstituted viruses after cotransfection of BAC DNA of the double deletion mutant E with overlapping unmutated fragments spanning the mutated regions, as illustrated in the pictogram in panel A. The arrows indicate the primer pairs used for PCR amplification. For the left side of the genome, PCR amplification results in a PCR product of 706 bp in the case of the wt genome but in no PCR product (due to the lack of the primer binding sites) in the case of the mutant genome. For the right side of the genome, PCR amplification results in a PCR product of 623 bp in the case of the wt genome and in a PCR product of 422 bp (due to the 201-bp deletion) in the case of the mutant genome. (Bottom) Virion DNAs were isolated from viruses reconstituted after cotransfection with either one or both of the fragments indicated in panel A, and the presence or absence of either the wt or mutated genomic fragment was investigated by PCR. Lanes 1, negative control (water); lanes 2, parental BAC; lanes 3, mutant E; lanes 4, mutant E plus cotransfection with the fragment spanning the deletion at the right side; lanes 5, mutant E plus cotransfection with the fragment spanning the deletion at the left side; lanes 6, mutant E plus cotransfection with both fragments. As expected, the wt pattern for the left side was restored after cotransfection with the left-side fragment or both fragments but not with the right-side fragment, and vice versa, i.e., the wt pattern for the right side was restored after cotransfection with the right-side fragment or both fragments but not with the left-side fragment.
|
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Identification of a second MHV-68 oriLyt with a plasmid-based replication assay. 293 cells were transfected with plasmid pST76K-SR (6.3 kb) containing either the 8.4-kb HindIII D fragment including the previously identified oriLyt (pST76K-SR-HindIII-D) (7) or a 6.9-kb fragment of MHV-68 containing the region of interest (pST76K-SR-Ori), followed by MHV-68 infection. Seventy-two hours after infection, extrachromosomal DNAs were prepared and digested with DpnI to digest input plasmid DNA and also with KpnI and AflII, which cut only once in all plasmids. The digested DNAs were analyzed by Southern blotting with a digoxigenin-labeled probe hybridizing to vector pST76K-SR. The arrows indicate the 13.2-kb and 14.7-kb DpnI-resistant replicated DNA fragments, whereas the bracket indicates the DpnI-sensitive input DNA. Marker sizes (in kilobase pairs) are indicated on the left.
|
We are grateful to B. Adler for a critical reading of the manuscript.
Published ahead of print on 18 April 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-herpesvirus infection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356:569-579.
-herpesviruses: a new model for understanding the role of immunity in chronic virus infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:371-379.[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»