Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2007, p. 5864-5871, Vol. 81, No. 11
0022-538X/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.02234-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Immunology/Microbiology,1 Section of Molecular Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612,2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 200523
Received 11 October 2006/ Accepted 9 March 2007
|
|
|---|
), which is elevated in the cerebral spinal fluid of HAD patients. We evaluated the mechanism of restrictive HIV replication in astrocytes and how IFN-
priming modulates this restriction. We demonstrate that the downstream effector of Wnt signaling, T-cell factor 4 (TCF-4), is part of a transcriptional complex that is immunoprecipitated with HIV TAR-containing region in untreated astrocytes but not in IFN-
-treated cells. Blocking TCF-4 activity with a dominant-negative mutant enhanced HIV replication by threefold in both the astrocytoma cell line U87MG and primary fetal astrocytes. Using a TCF-4 reporter plasmid, we directly demonstrate that Wnt signaling is active in human astrocytes and is markedly reduced by IFN-
treatment. Collectively, these data implicate TCF-4 in repressing HIV replication and the ability of IFN-
to regulate this restriction by inhibiting TCF-4. Given that TCF-4 is the downstream effector of Wnt signaling, harnessing Wnt signaling as an intrinsic molecular mechanism to limit HIV replication may emerge as a powerful tool to regulate HIV replication within and outside of the brain. |
|
|---|
Astrocytes constitute 40 to 70% of cells in the human brain. They play pivotal homeostatic and regulatory functions in maintaining the integrity of the blood-brain barrier and the survival of neurons (9, 47). HIV DNA and particles are detected within astrocytes of postmortem brain of adult HIV-positive patients (18, 51, 54), albeit at a lower frequency than microglia and infiltrating lymphocytes. HIV in vitro infection of astrocytes is restricted with production of few viral progeny (23). This restriction is unique because it leads to an initial burst of low-level HIV, followed by the accumulation of multiply spliced mRNAs (Tat, Rev, and Nef) with the translation of these proteins on occasion but without completing the viral life cycle (19, 36, 44, 50). Productive infection can be reestablished following stimulation with tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1ß (1, 3, 10, 33, 42), but HIV levels still consistently remain far lower than those documented in more HIV-permissive cells, such as microglia, CD4+ T cells, and monocytes. Limited HIV replication in primary astrocytes and astrocytoma cell lines is a consequence of blocks at multiple steps in the viral life cycle, including blocks at entry and postentry events. Bypassing entry requirements through transfection of full-length HIV provirus plasmid led to a transient burst of HIV replication followed by a rapid nonproductive HIV stage (4a, 22, 50, 50a), which represents a single round of HIV replication and indicates that restriction at entry level is a major blocking step. Yet when the level of HIV replication was normalized to transfection efficiency, the level of HIV in astrocytes was 50-fold lower than that in transfected HeLa cells (22, 23). Further, HIV pseudotyped with envelope glycoproteins of amphotropic murine leukemia virus or vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) demonstrated significant productive viral replication (5, 43a). Replication of the VSV-pseudotyped HIV is further enhanced when an intracellular inhibitor of HIV replication is blocked (23). These data suggest that while block in entry is a major step in restricted HIV in astrocytes, other intracellular events may contribute to this restriction.
The mechanism(s) of intracellular restriction of HIV replication in astrocytes is still not clearly delineated. T-cell factor 4 (TCF-4) was demonstrated to be a potent repressor of HIV replication in astrocytes (55). TCF-4 inhibited both basal and Tat-mediated transactivation of the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) (55). The mechanism of TCF-4 regulation of HIV replication is also not clearly defined. TCF-4 was shown to form a complex with Tat, presumably inhibiting Tat binding to transactivation response (TAR). More recently, TCF-4 was shown to interfere with Sp1 transcription factor, leading to modulation of its capability to activate the HIV LTR by binding to its cognate sites (40).
TCF-4 is a downstream effector of the Wnt pathway. Wnt genes encode a large family of soluble secreted glycoproteins that are differentially expressed and regulate neurogenesis of the developing brain (17) and T-lymphocyte development (46, 48). The canonical/ß-catenin-dependent pathway of Wnt signaling is initiated by binding of Wnt proteins to one of the eight members of the Frizzled receptor family. This signal transduction ultimately leads to stabilization of ß-catenin, because it is not phosphorylated by the serine/threonine kinase (glycogen synthase kinase 3). Active ß-catenin binds the lymphoid enhancer binding factor (LEF)/TCF family of transcription factors (LEF-1, TCF-1, TCF-3, and TCF-4), displacing their repressors such as transducin-like enhancer in humans and Groucho in Drosophila melanogaster, and this TCF-ß-catenin complex translocates to the nucleus, where it binds to TCF/LEF cognate DNA sequences, regulating gene transcription. TCF-ß-catenin target genes include c-myc, cyclin D, TCF-4, LEF-1, c-Jun, and CD44, among others. In the absence of a Wnt signal, defined by the lack of Wnt protein binding to Frizzled, ß-catenin is phosphorylated and associates with a protein complex (glycogen synthase kinase, axin, and the tumor suppressor protein adenomatous polyposis coli) that tags it for degradation. Without active ß-catenin in the nucleus, TCF and LEF remain associated with their repressors on their cis elements and inhibit gene transcription.
We previously demonstrated that prestimulation of astrocytes with gamma interferon (IFN-
) can overcome their restriction of HIV replication in both an astrocytoma cell line (U87MG) and primary human fetal astrocytes (HFA). Because studies linking TCF-4 to HIV repression in astrocytes were based on cotransfection of TCF-4 and Tat, it was not clear if TCF-4 is intrinsically expressed in astrocytes. We evaluated the role of TCF-4 in regulating HIV replication and in mediating the effect of IFN-
on regulating HIV productive replication in astrocytes. These studies are critical to devise strategies to harness these key signaling events to limit HIV replication within and outside of the brain.
|
|
|---|
IFN-
treatment and HIV infection.
Astrocytes were treated with 100 ng/ml of IFN-
(BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA) or left untreated for 24 h followed by HIV infection and maintenance of IFN-
postinfection. For infection experiments, astrocytes at 70 to 80% confluence were incubated with HIVBAL (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagents Program, Germantown, MD) at 10 ng p24/1 x 106 cells for 24 h and then washed three times. In some experiments, cells were trypsinized after HIV infection to further ensure removal of bound virus prior to culturing. HIV infection was monitored at day 7 postinfection by measuring p24 levels by conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD).
Immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometric analysis. To assess the level of purity of HFA cultures, 1 x 106 cells were detached with EDTA and incubated with 5% human serum and 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were washed, permeabilized, fixed according to a standard protocol (Caltag, Burlingame, CA), and stained with mouse anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (BD Pharmingen) conjugated to allophycocyanin or fluorescein isothiocyanate, mouse anti-CD68-phycoerythrin, mouse anti-microtubule-associated protein 2-allophycocyanin, and mouse antinestin-fluorescein isothiocyanate antibodies (BD Pharmingen). Fluorescence was evaluated with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer using FACSCalibur software (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Only cultures that were >95% pure were used in our experiments.
DNA isolation and real-time PCR.
DNA was isolated using Trizol, as recommended by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from IFN-
-stimulated or untreated U87MG cells and primary HFA and quantitated by conventional light absorption at 260/280 nm using a spectrophotometer. For each real-time PCR, 100 ng of DNA was amplified using a PCR mix containing 0.05 µM each of forward and reverse primers, 1x SYBR green, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 0.02 U/µl Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The primers used were R/U5 to amplify early reverse transcripts, R/5NC to amplify late reverse transcripts (24), SK145/150 to amplify gag/pol DNA (4b), or TAR1/TAR2 to amplify the bp 463 to 615 TAR HIV genomic sequence (accession no. K03455). Primer sequences for TAR1/TAR2 are TGGTTAGACCAGATCTGAGCC and TGACTAAAAGGGTCTGAGGGA, respectively. For quantitative SYBR green real-time PCR, the J1.1 cell line (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagents Program, Germantown, MD), which contains one proviral copy of HIV DNA per cell, was used as the HIV DNA standard at 2.5 x 101, 2.5 x 102, 2.5 x 103, 2.5 x 104, 2.5 x 105, and 2.5 x 106 copies per reaction. The amplification reaction consisted of an initial step at 94°C for 10 min and then 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds, with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min.
ChIP assay. The formaldehyde cross-linking and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays of astrocytes were performed as described previously (14). Briefly, 5 x 106 cells per immunoprecipitation (IP) were used. TCF-4 antibody was purchased from Upstate (Charlottesville, VA). Conditions for the ChIP included amplification of the desired target, as indicated, after formaldehyde fixation of the samples but prior to any IP step, IP without the addition of an antibody, or IP using TCF-4 antibody. Pulled-down products underwent real-time PCR amplification using the SYBR green PCR kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and primer sequences and PCR conditions as indicated above.
Transfection.
Primary human astrocytes and U87MG cells were transiently transfected using nucleofection, as recommended by the manufacturer (Amaxa, Gaithersburg, MD). Briefly, 5 x 106 cells were transfected with 10 µg of TOPflash, consisting of native TCF/LEF binding sites linked to a luciferase reporter vector (Upstate, Billerica, MA), 1 ng Renilla construct (Promega, Madison, WI), or green fluorescent protein (GFP) (pMaxGFP) construct as a control for transfection efficiency and to equalize the total amount of DNA used per transfection condition. Transfected cells were then left untreated or treated with IFN-
, and luciferase reporter activity was evaluated 24 h later by the dual luciferase assay, as recommended by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI). Luciferase values were normalized to Renilla activity. In some experiments, 3 x 106 to 5 x 106 cells were transfected with a TCF-4 dominant-negative mutant (James O'Kelly, UCLA, CA), which is a specific inhibitor of the ß-catenin/TCF-4 complex (49), or with pMaxGFP, prior to infection with HIV, and p24 levels were measured at day 7 postinfection.
Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics and graphical analysis were used. Nonparametric tests, such as the Wilcoxon rank sum test, were used as appropriate. GraphPad Instat software was used for data analysis.
|
|
|---|
-treated astrocytes.
We previously established that IFN-
pretreatment of astrocytes leads to induction of HIV replication (7). To evaluate the mechanism of HIV restriction in astrocytes and the mechanism by which IFN-
regulates this restriction, we compared the rates of HIV early and late reverse transcription between untreated and IFN-
-treated astrocytes. U87MG cells were left untreated or pretreated with IFN-
for 24 h and then infected with HIVBAL. Unbound virus was removed by trypsinization. Early HIV reverse transcription was evaluated by real-time PCR at 24 h postinfection by amplification with the R/U5 primer pair, which detects negative-strand "strong-stop" DNA indicative of reverse transcription initiation (16, 24). Late HIV reverse transcription was measured 96 h postinfection using primer pair R/5NC, which amplifies late reverse transcripts containing positive-strand DNA after the second template switch beyond the primer binding site (16, 24). The glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) housekeeping gene was coamplified as an internal control. The levels of early and late reverse transcription DNA amplification were similar between cultures left untreated and those treated with IFN-
(Fig. 1). These data indicate that HIV enters astrocytes and undergoes early and late reverse transcription but that enhanced virion entry or an accelerated rate of reverse transcription post-IFN-
treatment is not a likely contributing factor for IFN-
-mediated induction of HIV replication.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Comparative analysis of early and late HIV reverse transcription (RT) between infected untreated and infected IFN- -treated astrocytes. U87MG cells were left untreated or treated with IFN- prior to HIV infection as described in Materials and Methods. Total DNA was isolated and amplified for either early HIV reverse transcription (reverse transcription initiation) using primer pair R and U5 at 24 h postinfection or late HIV transcription using primer pair R and 5NC at 96 h postinfection. (A) Comparison of amplified HIV DNA between untreated and IFN- -treated cultures. (B) All of the controls for real-time PCR including GAPDH amplification from HIV-positive (pos.) and -negative (neg.) cultures. Data shown are representative of at least two experiments. In Fig. 1, 2, and 3, Rn stands for reading normalized, which equals the SyberGreen value divided by the ROX reference dye value.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Chromatin structures of TAR and LTR sequences are competent for transcriptional activities. U87MG cells were HIV infected or left uninfected. At 96 h, ChIP was performed by immunoprecipitating DNA associated with acetylated histones by using acetylated histone H2B antibody or no antibody. The immunoprecipitated DNA was subsequently amplified for TAR sequences between genomic locations +1 and +153 (A) and LTR sequences between genomic locations 460 and 206 (B). Conventional ChIP assay controls were included and shown in this figure, such as an "input control," referring to amplification of the DNA before the IP step, and a "no antibody control," referring to amplification of DNA after the IP step but without the addition of an acetylated histone H2B antibody. Data are representative of at least three experiments. Ac, acetylated; Ab and ab, antibody; pos., positive; neg., negative.
|
-mediated induction of HIV replication in astrocytes, the association between TCF-4 and the HIV TAR-containing region was examined with or without IFN-
treatment. ChIP was performed on U87MG cells left untreated or treated with IFN-
, infected with HIV, chromatin immunoprecipitated with a TCF-4-specific antibody, and DNA amplified for HIV between +1 and +153 bp. We demonstrate that TCF-4 is immunoprecipitated with TAR in untreated cultures but that this association is absent when the cells are primed with IFN-
(Fig. 3). Taken with our observation and that of others that untreated astrocytes do not support productive HIV replication, whereas IFN-
priming induces HIV replication (7), these data suggest that there is an inverse relationship between TCF-4 association with TAR-containing region and HIV replication. It is still unclear if TCF-4 is physically bound to DNA elements in R and U5 regions of HIV TAR or to another protein that subsequently is bound to TAR. In the latter case, TCF-4 IP will also precipitate the entire multiprotein complex. These and previously published data (55) point to a role for TCF-4 in regulating HIV replication in astrocytes.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. TCF-4 is immunoprecipitated with HIV TAR-containing region in untreated but not IFN- -treated cultures. U87MG cells were left untreated or primed with IFN- , as described previously (7), and infected with HIV, and ChIP was performed using TCF-4 antibody for IP. (A) Comparison of untreated and IFN- -treated TAR-containing HIV DNA immunoprecipitated with TCF-4. (B) Additional controls of uninfected cultures, input DNA, and no-antibody controls. pos., positive; neg., negative; Ab, antibody.
|
, as we previously reported (7). Priming the cells with IFN-
prior to transfection with dominant-negative TCF-4 did not result in a higher rate of HIV replication than that in cultures treated with IFN-
alone (data not shown). These data indicate that inhibition of TCF-4 activity removes the restriction on HIV replication in astrocytes.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A and B) Transfection efficiencies of U87MG cells (A) and HFA (B). The cells were transfected with GFP (pMaxGFP) plasmid using the Nucleofector system (Amaxa). Expression of GFP was evaluated by flow cytometry at day 3 posttransfection. The black histogram represents an isotype control, and the gray histogram represents GFP expression. TCF-4 inhibition abrogates restriction of HIV replication in untreated/non-IFN- -primed cells. (C and D) U87MG cells (C) or primary HFA (D) were transfected with the TCF-4 dominant-negative (DN) mutant or GFP construct, keeping the DNA amount constant between the two cultures. The cells were then infected with HIV. Data represent mean HIV p24 levels (pg/ml) ± standard errors of the means. HIV p24 level was measured by conventional ELISA at day 7 postinfection. Asterisks in panels C and D indicate P = 0.008 and P = 0.002, respectively, calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test between dominant-negative TCF-4- and GFP-transfected cells. Cultures infected with HIV without GFP transfection had p24 values similar to those of HIV-infected, GFP-transfected cultures, as we previously reported (7).
|
.
Although inhibition of TCF-4 by the dominant-negative mutant stresses the importance of active TCF-4 in restricting HIV replication, it was not informative regarding the mechanism by which IFN-
overcomes astrocyte restriction to productive HIV replication. To evaluate the impact of IFN-
on TCF-4 activity in regulating HIV replication, U87MG cells were left untreated or IFN-
treated and then transfected with either a TCF-4 luciferase construct (TOPflash) or a GFP construct and cultured with or without IFN-
. The TCF-4 reporter construct is an indicator of basal and inducible levels of Wnt signaling (45). Basal TCF-4 activity was detected in astrocytes, indicating active Wnt signaling in human astrocytes (Fig. 5). IFN-
markedly reduced this signal by approximately 50% (Fig. 5). These data in conjunction with the TCF-4 ChIP and dominant-negative transfection data indicate that active Wnt signaling is associated with HIV restriction in astrocytes and that IFN-
overcomes this restriction by reducing the potency of this pathway. This is the first indication that IFN-
regulates Wnt signaling, which can be harnessed to restrict HIV replication.
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Impact of IFN- on Wnt signaling. U87MG cells were left untreated or treated with IFN- for 24 h and then transfected with either TOPflash (containing four native TCF/LEF binding sites) and Renilla constructs or GFP and Renilla constructs. Transfected cells were then cultured with or without their initial treatment (with or without IFN- ). Luciferase relative light activity (relative light units) was measured 24 h later using a luminometer and normalized to Renilla activity. Data are based on at least three experiments and are presented as the increase (n-fold) in luciferase relative light units over Renilla ± standard deviation. The asterisk shows P < 0.0001 between untreated (first column) and IFN- -treated (second column) cultures using the Bonferroni multiple comparison test.
|
|
|
|---|
The exact mechanism of action of the TCF-4 transcription factor in inhibiting HIV infection is still not clear. Wortman et al. (55) reported that TCF-4 is a repressor of basal and Tat-mediated transactivation of the HIV LTR. This repression was reported to occur in a ß-catenin-independent manner. Thus, the core data are not different in showing that TCF-4 is a repressor of HIV replication, but the interpretation of how this may occur varies. We believe that this is ß-catenin dependent, and Wortman et al. indicate that it is not. Our model is more physiologic because it is based on basal levels of TCF-4 within astrocytes and infection of whole virus rather than transfecting the cells with exogenous TCF-4 and Tat as was done previously (55). Wortman et al. further suggested that TCF-4 binds directly to Tat, possibly sequestering it from binding to TAR (55). However, we show here that TCF-4 is complexed with a region that spans TAR (+1 to +153). It is also still likely that TCF-4 may bind Tat and that this complex binds to or near TAR, altering the stereochemistry of Tat-TAR interaction, leading to HIV inhibition or the formation of a multicomplex among TCF-4/ß-catenin, Tat, and TAR that leads to HIV inhibition. Recently it was also shown that TCF-4 interacts with the Sp1 transcription factor, which is one of the transcription factors that activate the HIV LTR, interfering with Sp1 LTR transactivation ability, in the absence of Tat (40). This interference could therefore result in lowered HIV gene transcription. These recent data point to a multi-DNA binding protein complex that inhibits HIV replication, the exact components of which remain to be elucidated. Our finding that astrocytes may be responding in an autocrine manner to Wnt activating ligands is not surprising, since the secretion of these Wnt proteins by astrocytes is known to occur as part of their role in maintaining homeostasis of the neuronal population (28). Collectively, our findings demonstrate that Wnt activation in astrocytes underlies a significant block to HIV replication.
The ability of the dominant-negative mutant of TCF-4 to elude the restriction of HIV replication in astrocytes and the fact that the dominant-negative TCF-4 is mutated in its ß-catenin binding site suggest that the association between ß-catenin and TCF-4 is critical for suppressing HIV replication and that repression of HIV replication probably occurs via the canonical/ß-catenin-dependent Wnt signaling pathway. The mechanism of IFN-
-mediated downregulation of this HIV-inhibitory complex may also be multifaceted. While IFN-
is known to increase phosphorylation and binding of Sp1 (43), which could in turn bind TCF-4, sequestering it from binding the HIV LTR, we show a link between IFN-
and the downstream effector of Wnt activity (TCF/LEF transcription). Although IFN-
inhibited TCF/LEF transcriptional activity, this inhibition may be indirect through inhibition of ß-catenin, which is important in regulating the transcription of TCF genes. Alternatively, classical signaling of IFN-
through the Stat-Jun pathway may be related to Wnt signaling, leading to the observed effect of IFN-
markedly reducing TCF/LEF transcriptional activity. A role for IFN-
in inhibiting the Wnt pathway is further supported by studies showing that IFN-
upregulates the secretion of Wnt inhibitor DKK1, albeit in human melanoma cell lines (21).
These studies indicate that active Wnt signaling in astrocytes is associated with restricted HIV replication. In the setting of chronic inflammation that occurs during HIV infection of the central nervous system, IFN-
expression is elevated and is associated with HIV-associated dementia/encephalitis (25). Expression of IFN-
can thus compromise the innate ability of astrocytes to resist productive HIV replication, through the observed inhibition of Wnt signaling. Numerous examples exist of HIV manipulating the immune system in its favor, as in its ability to downregulate CD4 and antigen presentation molecules (major histocompatibility complex classes I and II and CD1d) (8, 11). This theme may emerge again whereby IFN-
upregulates major histocompatibility complex class II on astrocytes (data not shown and data reported in references 6 and 20), possibly enhancing their antigen presentation capability and immune competence, but at the same time IFN-
may inactivate the intrinsic pathway (Wnt signaling) that restricts HIV replication in astrocytes, leading to their susceptibility to HIV productive infection. Wnt signaling through ß-catenin is a survival signal as it is associated with upregulation of the antiapoptotic gene product Bcl-xL (56). IFN-
, conversely, is a proapoptotic signal for virally infected cells. Therefore, IFN-
-mediated inhibition of the Wnt pathway seems a logical consequence if the net effect of IFN-
is cell death rather than survival of the infected target. HIV may take advantage of this pathway by replicating in cells receiving an IFN-
signal that inhibits Wnt signaling. These studies are thus critical to gaining an understanding of factors within the brain microenvironment that may regulate HIV replication within astrocytes and consequently susceptibility to HIV-associated cognitive-motor impairment. Dysregulated astrocytes lead to significant biologic abnormalities in the brain, such as dysregulated neurotoxin scavenging capabilities and/or maintenance of the blood-brain barrier by astrocytes, leading to clinical manifestation of HIV-associated neuropathogenesis (23, 32, 41, 53).
Based on our data demonstrating the ability of TCF-4 to restrict HIV replication and those published by others pointing to TCF-4 as an HIV repressor (55), we suggest that the Wnt pathway, which regulates TCF-4 activity, is an intracellular innate pathway that restricts HIV replication. To our knowledge this is the first rationale for a signaling pathway that can be easily activated and/or inactivated with commercially available reagents to influence HIV replication within and outside of the brain. Ultimately, arsenals of natural host restrictive proteins (APOPEC 3G, TRIM5a, and Wnt pathway) can be translated as new modalities for anti-HIV therapy.
Published ahead of print on 28 March 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»