Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, March 2006, p. 3021-3029, Vol. 80, No. 6
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.80.6.3021-3029.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute of Zoology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan,1 Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan,2 Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore,3 CSIRO Livestock Industries, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St. Lucia, Australia4
Received 15 September 2005/ Accepted 5 December 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A virion is a complex assembly of macromolecules exquisitely suited for the protection and delivery of viral genomes. Its structural proteins are particularly important, since these proteins are the first molecules to interact with the host, and they therefore play critical roles in cell targeting as well as in the triggering of host defenses. Recently, thanks to the introduction of proteomic methods, the total number of known WSSV structural proteins increased to 39 (5, 17).
Immunogold electron microscopy (IEM) has been used to identify VP28, VP26, VP31, VP51C, VP36B, VP41A, VP12B, and VP180 as envelope proteins (4, 5, 8, 9, 28-30) and VP664 as a nucleocapsid protein (7). Other studies (1, 6, 18-20) that combined detergent treatment and Western blotting confirmed and expanded most of these results (VP28, VP19, and VP73 as envelope proteins; VP24, VP15, and VP35 as nucleocapsid proteins) but also identified VP26 as a nucleocapsid protein. Here for the first time we embark on a systematic study of the structural proteins of WSSV that not only allows us to resolve the question of VP26's location but also reveals the existence of a previously unreported component of the WSSV virion. This component is an intermediate layer between the envelope and the nucleocapsid. We refer to this proteinaceous layer as the tegument. This name was borrowed from two other kinds of DNA virus (herpesvirus and baculovirus) whose viral particles consist of four morphologically distinct components (DNA core, nucleocapsid, tegument, and envelope [14, 15]). We further show that VP26 is in fact a tegument protein and reconcile this conclusion with the earlier conflicting reports.
|
|
|---|
Proliferation and purification of intact WSSV virions. Hemolymph was collected from experimentally WSSV-infected shrimps (P. monodon; mean weight, 20 g), diluted 1:4 with phosphate-buffered saline, and frozen with liquid nitrogen as described previously (26). From this virus stock, a sample (0.5 ml) was centrifuged (1,500 x g for 10 min), and the supernatant was filtered (0.45-µm filter) and injected (0.2 ml; 1:20 dilution in phosphate-buffered saline) intramuscularly into healthy crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, between the second and third abdominal segments. Between 5 and 7 days later, hemolymph was collected from the infected crayfish and centrifuged at 1,500 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was layered on the top of a 35% (wt/vol in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5) sucrose solution and centrifuged at 89,000 x g using a 28 SA rotor in a Hitachi ultracentrifuge (SCP85H2) for 1 h at 4°C. The virus pellet was resuspended with Tris buffer and then subjected to a 35 to 65% stepwise sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation (89,000 x g for 2 h in a 40 ST rotor). The collected virus bands were then mixed with Tris buffer and repelleted at 89,000 x g for 1 h at 4°C. The resulting pellet was again dissolved in Tris buffer. To check for quality and quantity, virus samples were negatively stained with 2% sodium phosphotungstate and examined under a transmission electron microscope (JEOL JEM1010). Purified virus samples were prepared in this way for all the subsequent experiments.
Fractionation of virion proteins by detergent treatment at different NaCl concentrations. Using a modification of the procedure originally described by Walker et al. (21), a purified virus suspension was divided into five equal parts. One part was set aside as a control, while the other four parts were treated with 1% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 30 min at different salt concentrations (0 M, 0.1 M, 0.5 M, and 1 M NaCl). The four Triton X-100-treated parts were then layered on top of a 35% sucrose cushion and separated into two fractions, supernatant and pellet, by centrifugation at 30,000 x g for 1 h (27). The insoluble pellets were dissolved in an equal volume of Tris buffer, and the proteins in each of the eight resultant fractions (and in the intact purified virion control) were separated by 8 to 18% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). After separation, the SDS-PAGE gels were either stained with Sypro Ruby stain or else transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore), blocked with 3% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline (50 mM Tris, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.5) plus 0.5% Tween 20 at 4°C overnight, and then subjected to Western blotting.
Identification of the proteins in each fraction by Western blot analysis. To identify the proteins in the SDS-PAGE gels, polyclonal antibodies against specific WSSV structural proteins were generated either in rat (for VP26) or in rabbit (for 14 other proteins) by using the expressed recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli as described previously (7). The polyvinylidene difluoride membranes were then incubated with diluted primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature, and anti-rabbit or anti-rat immunoglobulin G antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was used as the secondary antibody. A chemiluminescence system (Perkin Elmer, Inc.) was used for detection.
Identification of proteins in the purified nucleocapsid. To confirm the identity of the nucleocapsid proteins, a purified virus sample in Tris buffer (1 ml) was treated with 1% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. This reaction mixture (1 ml) was then layered on top of a 40% (4 ml) to 50% (6 ml) discontinuous CsCl gradient (wt/vol in Tris buffer, pH 7.5) and centrifuged to equilibrium at 37,000 rpm (172,000 x g) for 20 h (40 ST rotor). Two visible bands, at buoyant densities of 1.28 and 1.40 g CsCl/ml, respectively, were collected separately, diluted in Tris, and repelleted at 89,000 x g for 1 h; the presence of nucleocapsids was then checked for by electron microscopy. The topmost fraction (1 ml; buoyant density, 1.15 g CsCl/ml) and bottom pellet (dissolved in TE buffer) were also collected. In these samples, the presence of WSSV DNA was detected as described previously (12); that is, WSSV genomic DNA was extracted by protease K and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide treatments, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation.
The proteins in these samples were then separated by 8 to 18% gradient SDS-PAGE and stained with Sypro Ruby. Protein bands were manually excised from the gels and identified by liquid chromatography (LC)-nanoelectrospray ionization (nanoESI)-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) as described previously (17).
Trypsin treatment of purified virions. Following the method of Zhu and Yuan (33), we treated aliquots (5 µg of total protein) of purified virions with trypsin (5 µg/ml) (Promega) in 100 µl of buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 1 mM CaCl2, 100 mM NaCl) at 37°C for 2 h. Trypsin digestion was terminated by adding phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to a final concentration of 0.5 mM and then adding 1/50 volume of protease inhibitors (Roche). In some samples, prior to trypsin digestion, Triton X-100 was added to a final of concentration of 1% to remove the viral envelope and expose the internal (tegument/nucleocapsid) structure to the protease. All samples were analyzed by Western blotting.
Localization of VP26, VP28, and VP664 by IEM. Aliquots (10 µl) of purified virion suspension were adsorbed to Formvar-supported, carbon-coated nickel grids (150 mesh) for 5 min at room temperature. The grids either were prefixed for 5 min with 4% paraformaldehyde and 1% Triton X-100 simultaneously in 50 mM Tris buffer (to remove the virus envelope) or else were left unfixed and were incubated with incubation buffer only (0.1% Aurion Basic-c, 15 mM NaN3, 10 mM phosphate buffer, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). Other grids were loaded with purified nucleocapsid samples (5-min absorption at room temperature) prepared as described above using a CsCl gradient centrifugation. These nucleocapsid grids were left unfixed. All grids were then blocked with blocking buffer (5% bovine serum albumin, 5% normal serum, 0.1% cold water skin gelatin, 10 mM phosphate buffer, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) for 30 min and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a diluted primary antibody for VP26, VP28, or VP664. The primary antibodies were diluted 1:25 (1:40 for VP664) in incubation buffer. After incubation, and after several washes with incubation buffer, the grids for VP28 and VP664 were incubated with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with gold particles (15-nm diameter; 1:20 dilution in incubation buffer) for 1 h at room temperature; for VP26, the second antibody was goat anti-rat. The grids were then washed extensively with incubation buffer, washed twice more with distilled water to remove excess salt, and negatively stained with 2% sodium phosphotungstate. Specimens were examined with a transmission electron microscope.
Ultrastructural observations by transmission electron microscopy. Following the method of Wang et al. (23), we used primary cell cultures from the lymphoid organ of Penaeus monodon to investigate morphogenesis of WSSV. Inoculated primary culture cells were harvested at 4 days postinoculation. Harvested cells were centrifuged at 175 x g for 10 min, and the resultant cell blocks were prefixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cold phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) for 3 h at 4°C and then postfixed in 1% OsO4 for 2 h at 4°C. The fixed samples were then dehydrated in an alcohol gradient series (from 70% to absolute alcohol) and embedded in Spurr-Epon. Ultrathin sections were cut on a Reichert OMU ultramicrotome and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (66K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Preparation of the eight virion protein fractions by treatment of the purified virions with Triton X-100 at different NaCl concentrations. The original location of the proteins in each of the four insoluble fractions (P1 to P4) and four soluble fractions was inferred from the electron micrographs and from other evidence (see text). Arrows in electron micrographs P1 and P2 indicate olive-shaped particles that exhibit a characteristic banded pattern, which can be seen more clearly in the P1 inset. Arrows in electron micrograph P3 indicate the condensed fibrillar structures inside the nucleocapsids. Scale bars = 100 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (90K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Protein composition of detergent-treated WSSV virions. An 8 to 18% gradient SDS-PAGE gel was used and stained with Sypro Ruby stain. V is the untreated purified virus. Lanes P1 to P4 and S1 to S4 correspond to the fractions in Fig. 1. M is the protein molecular mass marker.
|
![]() View larger version (81K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Western blots of 15 of the protein bands from the SDS-PAGE whose results are shown in Fig. 2. The proteins were divided into three groups based on their reaction profiles.
|
![]() View larger version (102K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. (A) Sypro Ruby-stained 8 to 18% gradient SDS-PAGE gels of protein fractions purified on a CsCl gradient. Lane S is the topmost soluble protein fraction (buoyant density, 1.15 g/ml); lane N is the nucleocapsid band (buoyant density, 1.40 g/ml). Lane D represents the debris that banded at 1.28 g CsCl/ml. Lane V represents the total virions; lane M is the protein molecular mass marker. The numbered bands represent proteins that were identified by LC-MS/MS analysis. Vitellogenin and hemocyanin bands are indicated, and other known proteins in the supernatant are also identified. (B) Electron micrograph of negatively stained WSSV nucleocapsids purified from the nucleocapsid fraction of the CsCl equilibrium centrifugation. Scale bar = 100 nm. Many of the nucleocapsids appear to be open at one end (arrows). (C) Detection of viral DNA in the respective fractions. Lane headings are as in Fig. 4A, except for lane B, which represents the bottom pellet of the CsCl gradient; M, DNA marker.
|
To identify the minor bands that were present in the nucleocapsid fraction (Fig. 4A, lane N), the protein bands in this lane were excised individually from the gel. Following trypsin digestion, the peptides of each band were sequenced using LC-nanoESI-MS/MS, and the sequences were matched against the NCBInr database. The positively identified proteins and their corresponding open reading frames (ORFs) in the viral genome are listed in Table 1. Two of these proteins, VP160A and VP160B, are newly reported structural proteins for WSSV. These results also confirm our earlier conclusion that VP51C and VP60B are both nucleocapsid proteins.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Proteomic identification of WSSV nucleocapsid proteins
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Western blot analysis showing trypsin digestion of three representative proteins, VP28 (envelope), VP26 (tegument), and VP664 (nucleocapsid) in intact and detergent-treated virions.
|
![]() View larger version (165K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Immunoelectron microscopy analysis of purified virus (row 1, enveloped virions; row 2, unenveloped virions; row 3, nucleocapsids) probed with VP28, VP26, and VP664 antibodies. The VP28 antibody bound only to the enveloped virion. The VP26 antibody bound only to unenveloped virions (i.e., the tegument-nucleocapsid structure) and not to the viral envelope or the nucleocapsid. The VP664 antibody bound both to unenveloped virions and to the nucleocapsids. Scale bar = 100 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. (A to F) Thin-section electron micrographs showing successive stages of virion assembly in a primary culture of Penaeus monodon lymphoid organ cells infected with WSSV for 4 days. (G) Computer-enhanced image of the fibrillar component being packed inside the nucleocapsid shown in panel D. (H) Computer-enhanced image of an intact, negatively stained virion. ENV, envelope; FIB, fibrillar component; THR, characteristic thread-like extension of the WSSV virion; PLUG, distinct pluglike structure at the base of the thread. Scale bar = 100 nm.
|
|
|
|---|
In Fig. 3, VP28 and VP19 are in the envelope protein group (group 1), and VP664 is in the nucleocapsid protein group (group 3). This is consistent with previous reports (7, 19, 20). Figure 3 also shows for the first time that VP38A, VP51B, and VP53A are all envelope proteins, from which it follows that these proteins might be important in future virus-host interaction studies.
The role of VP15 is slightly more complex. VP15 is a basic DNA binding protein of WSSV, and it has been suggested that it may be involved in packing the viral genome in the nucleocapsid (24, 31). Even though VP15 was not found in the nucleocapsid fraction in Fig. 4A, this suggestion is still consistent with the CsCl gradient results. These results show that when VP15 was solubilized in the supernatant (Fig. 4A), the virus DNA was found in the nucleocapsid fraction and also in the bottom pellet but not in the debris fraction or the soluble protein fraction (Fig. 4C). We hypothesize that when VP15 is no longer present to ensure the orderly (folded, not helical) packing of DNA inside the nucleocapsid, the 300-kbp circular DNA might either remain tangled around the nucleocapsid (fraction N) or else break free completely so that the DNA gravitates to the bottom pellet while the lighter nucleocapsid proteins (empty capsids) form the upper band of debris.
Further support for this explanation is provided by the fibrillar structures that are seen in Fig. 1, micrograph P3. The indicated structures, which we interpret as folded viral DNA, are less prevalent at 1 M NaCl, i.e., when VP15 is completely solubilized, because in the absence of VP15 the DNA would be more likely to have at least partly escaped and remained tangled half inside and half outside of the nucleocapsid. Conversely, the presence of VP15 may be essential for the DNA packing to proceed to completion, and considering the large quantity of DNA that must be packed inside the mature virion, this may in turn account for WSSV's characteristic swollen olive-like shape. We therefore propose that while VP664 and VP15 both appear in the nucleocapsid, VP15 should in fact be considered as a core protein (as opposed to a major capsid protein such as VP664).
We proposed in a previous paper (7) that VP664 was a major nucleocapsid protein and that the banded pattern visible in WSSV nucleocapsids was due to VP664 molecules being arranged in a series of stacked disks. Here, the IEM data show not only that VP664 is part of the nucleocapsid but also that it was quite evenly distributed at intervals on the outer surface of the unenveloped virion (Fig. 6F; see also Fig. 5D in reference 7). This suggests that parts of the VP664 molecule must be exposed on the outside of the tegument-nucleocapsid structure. We therefore conclude that the tegument layer is not a completely impermeable structure but rather allows some domains of the VP664 molecules (possibly the globular knob domain) to project through to the outside. Furthermore, since Fig. 6E shows that the major tegument protein VP26 is also located on the outside of the tegument, we propose that VP26 may be inserted between the exposed VP664 domains and that this interleaving may increase the flexibility of the nucleocapsid and allow it to assume its characteristic olive-like shape in the mature virion. Consistent with this idea, we note that when VP26 is dissociated from the nucleocapsid at high NaCl concentrations, the nucleocapsid does in fact conform to a more rigid, rod-shaped structure (Fig. 6, G to I). We note too that the core protein VP15 is also dissociated at higher salt concentrations (Fig. 2), and that it too may be implicated in this reversion to a rod-shaped structure. If the presence of VP15 is required for complete packing of the DNA, then its removal may lead to disorganization of the folded core DNA and a collapse of the swollen olive-shaped virion (cf. Fig. 1, micrograph P2 versus P3).
While VP664 molecules evidently extend from the nucleocapsid through to the outside surface of the tegument, the converse is not true for VP26; that is, VP26 molecules are located exclusively in the tegument and do not extend inwards to the nucleocapsid. This helps to account for the unexpected result shown in Fig. 5 that even without treatment with detergent, VP664 is digested by trypsin, while VP26 is not: if we assume that trypsin digestion of envelope proteins such as VP28 also opens a hole in the envelope (perhaps by opening the pluglike structure shown in Fig. 7H, although this could not be directly verified by EM; data not shown), then trypsin would be able to penetrate to the inside of the nucleocapsid, where it could digest VP664. However, the tegument layer (where VP26 is located) would still not be immediately accessible and would therefore remain mostly intact (undigested).
Proteomic mass spectrometry analyses were performed by the Core Facilities for Proteomics Research, located at the Institute of Biological Chemistry, Academia Sinica. We are indebted to Paul Barlow for his helpful criticism.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»