Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2006, p. 12293-12302, Vol. 80, No. 24
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01619-06
CSIRO Livestock Industries, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria 3220, Australia,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland 208142
Received 28 July 2006/ Accepted 15 September 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
75%) (2, 3, 5, 25). NiV is classified as a select agent by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and, unlike most notable viral agents of biodefense concern such as smallpox or Ebola virus, NiV can be isolated from natural sources (14, 29, 32) and readily grown in cell culture to high titers (15). It may be transmitted via the respiratory tract and can be amplified and spread in livestock serving as a source for transmission to humans (18, 24). There is currently a paucity of accepted animal models for henipavirus infection and the restriction of live NiV and HeV experimentation to biological safety level 4 (BSL4) containment has significantly hampered their rapid development. The implementation of typical laboratory animal models has also been problematic. NiV and HeV do not cause disease in mice after subcutaneous administration, although they are lethal if administered intracranially (G. Crameri and B. T. Eaton, unpublished data). Further, there was no serological evidence of NiV infection in rodents from Malaysia (11, 39) or of HeV infection in rodents from Australia (30). To our knowledge, rabbits have been examined only with respect to HeV, and no clinical disease was observed (36). Guinea pigs have proven considerably variable in respect to both NiV- and HeV-induced pathology (reviewed in reference 17). Symptoms of NiV infection in humans range from fever and headache to either severe acute febrile encephalitis (predominant) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (less frequent) (2, 13, 20), whereas the porcine disease is primarily a febrile respiratory illness (24). In both humans and pigs, NiV pathogenesis presents as a systemic vasculitis (26, 38). Both cats and dogs were observed to be susceptible to disease during the initial NiV outbreak (24). The clinical and pathological features of cats naturally (24) or experimentally infected resembled those seen in humans and pigs (26), particularly with respect to tropism for arterial endothelial cells and respiratory epithelium. Moreover, experimental infection of cats and hamsters has revealed a similar underlying pathology (26, 37). While the latter study indicated a role for hamsters in respect to a NiV disease model for the central nervous system (37), encephalitis has not been identified in cats from limited field or experimental data.
Currently, there are no approved active or passive therapeutic treatment modalities available for the henipaviruses (reviewed in reference 7). Although there is some evidence that ribavirin therapy may be of clinical benefit (10), recent experimental infection models have not supported this (19). Ribavirin therapy also has limited value due to the toxic side effects seen at therapeutic dose rates, mainly involving hemolytic anemia (16). In regard to vaccination approaches, it is the major viral envelope glycoproteins against which virtually all neutralizing antibodies are directed, and neutralizing antibodies are the key vaccine-induced protective mechanisms in the case of mumps and measles viruses (21, 28), with the attachment glycoproteins often serving as the predominant target. Previously, it has been shown that vaccinia virus expressed fusion (F) or attachment (G) glycoproteins from NiV can elicit virus-neutralizing antibodies (31), and studies using a hamster model have indicated that a vaccination approach using recombinant vaccinia virus encoding NiV F or G may be effective (22). However, such a vaccine is unlikely to receive regulatory approval. Most recently, a recombinant canarypox vaccine candidate for swine encoding NiV F and G glycoproteins has been shown to protect animals against challenge (34).
We sought to explore the possibility of a subunit vaccine approach for henipaviruses and have produced and extensively characterized recombinant expressed, soluble versions of the G glycoprotein (sG) from HeV and NiV (8). Purified sG has been shown to retain a number of important native structural, functional, and antigenic features, including the ability to bind virus receptor (ephrinB2) (6), block virus-mediated membrane fusion and virus infection, and elicit a robust polyclonal neutralizing antibody response in rabbits and mice (8). The sG glycoprotein can also capture and isolate virus-specific neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) from naive recombinant libraries (40). These attributes make sG potentially suitable as a vaccine candidate. We also wanted to evaluate a species capable of developing systemic disease as a consequence of natural exposure to NiV, analogous to an epidemic or outbreak scenario and, because cats were also susceptible to disease caused by HeV, both directly and via contact with affected animals (35), we chose to develop cats as an animal model of NiV infection. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently implemented the Animal Efficacy Rule in 2002, which applies to the development of therapeutic products when human efficacy studies are not possible (17a). In short, evidence derived from animal studies on product effectiveness in preventing or treating disease may be relied on when particular criteria are met, such as a well-understood mechanism for the pathogenicity of the agent in conjunction with the underlying mechanism of the product. Importantly, however, the therapeutic effect must be demonstrated in more than one animal species. By characterizing a highly susceptible animal model that provides consistent clinical outcomes, it may be exceedingly useful in future studies for the screening and evaluation of potential therapeutic intervention strategies for henipavirus infection.
|
|
|---|
Nipah virus infections. Two cats were inoculated subcutaneously with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 500 50% tissue culture infective dose(s) (TCID50) and two with 5,000 TCID50 of NiV (stock virus titer, 1.1 x 107 TCID50/ml) prepared as described previously (15). Cats were assessed daily and scored out of 10 for a range of clinical observations, including alertness, grooming behavior, curiosity, depression, food eaten, feces production, and respiration rate. Clinical scores for each day were combined to provide a cumulative daily score. Rectal temperatures and body weights were recorded during sampling periods, which occurred every second day. Once the cats were clinically assessed to be exhibiting signs of disease, animals were then immobilized as described above. Blood was collected via intracardiac puncture, and the animals were immediately euthanized by intravenous injection of sodium pentabarbitone.
Immunization and challenge. Four adult cats were immunized three times with a 100-µg dose of recombinant, sG (8); two animals received HeV sG, and two received NiV sG. Each dose was prepared in CSIRO triple adjuvant (60% [vol/vol] Montanide, 40% [vol/vol] sG [combined with Quil A, 3 mg/ml, and DEAE-dextran, 30 mg/ml] in water) (8). Animals were inoculated subcutaneously, at 2-week intervals, and bled approximately 2 weeks and 2 months after the final immunization. Immunizations took place on days 0, 13, and 28. The first bleed was on day 48; the second bleed was on day 93. NiV challenge occurred on day 104. Serum was assessed for antibody production by using a serum neutralization test as described below. Prior to virus challenge, all animals for the vaccine study were implanted with radiotelemetry transmitters for continuous, remote monitoring of body temperature as described below. The four vaccinated animals and two unvaccinated controls were inoculated subcutaneously with 500 TCID50 of NiV and then monitored twice daily for clinical disease onset and sampled over a range of times as described above.
Radiotelemetry measurements of body temperature. With the animals under anesthesia as described above, single-stage transmitters fitted with an internal loop antenna and coated with an inert two-pot epoxy resin (Sirtrack, Havelock North, New Zealand) were implanted subcutaneously between the shoulder blades (final dimensions, 25 by 15 by 6 mm). Briefly, transmitters use a thermistor to control the pulse rate and emit pulses at discrete frequencies (e.g., 150.100 MHz) in proportion to temperature. All transmitters were calibrated by submersion in a water bath, followed by chemical sterilization (chlorhexidine followed by 70% alcohol and, finally, sterile saline) prior to implantation. Pulses were detected with a PCR-1000 scanning receiver (Icom, Inc., Osaka, Japan) linked to a standard PC via an RS232 connection. An in-house Visual Basic code was written to control the receiver and log the telemetry data. Transmitters were consecutively scanned for 1 min each (6-min cycle time), providing near real-time monitoring of the body temperature for all animals.
Sample collection. Specimens for virus isolation (heparinized blood and oral swabs) and RNA isolation (EDTA blood and oral swabs) were collected every second day postinfection (p.i.) and just prior to euthanasia. Urine was only collected from female cats by urethral catheterization at each sampling time and from all cats at necropsy. Each swab for virus isolation was immediately placed into 1 ml of viral transport medium (PBS containing 100 U of penicillin, 100 µg of streptomycin/ml, and 500 µg of amphotericin B [Fungizone]/ml), while all samples for RNA isolation were mixed with 1 ml of RNAlater (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX). All specimens were held at 80°C until isolation attempts were made. After euthanasia, the samples were collected aseptically from the lung (apical and diaphragmatic lobes); brain (olfactory and occipital lobes); heart; prescapular, retropharyngeal, or thoracic lymph nodes; spleen; liver; kidney; bladder; and adrenal gland. In addition, in female cats, the uterine horn and ovaries were collected. Tissues were either fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h prior to histological processing or submerged in RNAlater or viral transport medium and then stored at 80°C until processing for RNA or viral isolation, respectively.
Virus isolation. NiV was isolated by using Vero cells grown in Eagle's minimal essential medium (EMEM) supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics as described above. A 10% homogenate of each tissue sample was prepared in PBS. Blood was diluted 1:10 and 1:100 in media (EMEM plus 1% FCS). Fluids from swabs were tested neat. Each sample (200 µl) was inoculated onto one well of a 24-well plate containing 80% confluent Vero cells, followed by incubation for 60 min. The monolayers were washed with PBS and incubated with 2 ml of EMEM containing 1% FCS and antibiotics. Samples were observed for the NiV cytopathic effect (CPE) over a period of 4 days. All samples were passaged twice before being considered negative. The identity of NiV was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining as described previously (9).
RNA isolation. RNA was isolated from blood cells by using the RiboPure-Blood kit (Ambion, Inc.); from swabs, serum, and urine by using the QIAamp viral RNA kit (QIAGEN Pty, Ltd., Clifton Hill, Australia); and from tissues by using the RNeasy Minikit (QIAGEN Pty, Ltd.). Briefly, under BSL4 conditions, 300 µl of blood was added to 800 µl of RiboPure lysis buffer and 50 µl of sodium acetate. Then, 140 µl of swab solution or urine was added to 560 µl of AVL viral lysis buffer (QIAamp). Tissues were homogenized by removing the tissue from RNAlater and adding it to tubes containing 600 µl of RLT lysis medium (RNeasy) containing 6 µl of ß-mercaptoethanol and 250 µl of 1-mm zirconia/silica beads (BioSpec Products, Inc., Bartlesville, OK). Samples were then homogenized for two cycles of 30 s by using a Mini-Bead beater (Biospec Products, Inc.) and centrifuged to pellet the cell debris, and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. All samples were then removed from the BSL4 lab and processed according to the manufacturer's instructions supplied with each kit.
NiV genome TaqMan PCR assay. The primers and TaqMan probe to detect NiV genome sequences were designed from the N gene sequence of NiV AF212302 (12) using specified criteria in the Primer Express Software (version 1.5; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The specific NiV oligonucleotide primers were Nipah-N1198F (5'-TCAGCAGGAAGGCAAGAGAGTAA-3') and Nipah-N1297R (5'-CCCCTTCATCGATATCTTGATCA-3'). The fluorogenic 5' nuclease (TaqMan) probe was Nipah 1247comp (5'-FAM [6-carboxy-fluorescein]-TGCTGGCACCAGACTTGCCCTC-3'-TAMRA [6-carboxy-tetramethyl rhodamine]). 18S rRNA was used to normalize for variations in RNA extraction. The 18S oligonucleotide primers were 18SrRNAF (5'-CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA-3') and 18SrRNAR (5'-GCTGGAATTACCGCGGCT-3'). The fluorogenic 5' nuclease (TaqMan) probe for 18SrRNA was 5'-VIC-CCTCCAATGAGCACACCTCCTGCAG-3'-TAMRA.
Assays were performed in triplicate using a one-step protocol consisting of an initial reverse transcription reaction followed immediately by cDNA amplification. All TaqMan reagents were purchased from Applied Biosystems except the primers, which were obtained from Geneworks (Hindmarsh, Australia). RNA (2 µl) was added to 23 µl of PCR mix in each well of a MicroAmp optical reaction plate containing 12.5 µl of TaqMan One-Step PCR Mastermix, 0.625 µl of 40x Multiscribe/RNase inhibitor, 5.75 µl of distilled water, 1.25 µl each of 18 µM Nipah N1198F and N1297R primers, 1.25 µl of 5 µM Nipah-1247-comp-FAM-labeled probe, 0.125 µl each of 10 µM 18SrRNAF and 18SrRNAR, and 0.125 µl of 40 µM 18SrRNA-VIC-labeled probe. The samples were amplified in a GeneAmp 7700 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems) using the following program: 48°C for 30 min, 1 cycle; 95°C for 10 min, 1 cycle; and 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s, 50 cycles. Primer and probe optimization experiments were performed as recommended in the AB7700 sequence detection system protocol. A dilution series was made of each NiV primer (900 to 50 nM) and probe (250 to 25 nM) to determine the optimum concentrations (data not shown).
Standard curves were obtained for NiV-specific cDNA in triplicate for each assay. The threshold cycle (CT) values obtained from the standard dilutions were plotted against the input cDNA concentration to create a standard curve (data not shown). Linear regression analysis was used to quantify the NiV RNA. To correct for sample variation, CT values for NiV genome in samples were normalized against 18S rRNA expression, and NiV genome was expressed relative to a standard NiV cDNA dilution (3.6 pg of NiV cDNA).
Serum neutralization test. Virus neutralization antibody titers were determined as previously described (8). Briefly, sera were diluted in EMEM containing 10% FCS (EMEM-10) and subjected to doubling dilution starting at 1:20. Then, 50 µl of serum was added to each well in quadruplicate in a 96-well plate, followed by 50 µl of virus containing 200 TCID50 of either HeV or NiV; the plates were then incubated at 37°C for 30 min. A total of 2 x 104 Vero cells was added to all wells in 150 µl of EMEM-10, followed by incubation at 37°C for 4 days in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Neutralization titers were determined by the presence of CPE and recorded as the serum dilution where at least one of the replicate wells showed no virus-induced CPE.
Histopathology and immunohistochemistry. Tissues were routinely dehydrated through graded alcohols, cleared and embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at 3 to 4 µm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Further sections were prepared for immunohistochemistry by using a rabbit polyclonal anti-NiV antiserum (26).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. NiV susceptibility study body temperatures and respiration rates. (A) Rectal temperatures obtained at various days postinfection in cats inoculated with either 500 TCID50 of NiV (circles) or 5,000 TCID50 of NiV (squares). All cats became febrile 6 to 8 days postinfection. (B) Respiration rates determined for cats infected with either 500 TCID50 NiV (circles) or 5,000 TCID50 NiV (squares). Immediately prior to euthanasia, all cats exhibited a marked increase in respiration rate.
|
![]() View larger version (157K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Histopathology and immunohistopathology associated with NiV infection in cats. (A) Necrotizing alveolitis (arrows) in NiV-infected cat and endothelial syncytial cell (arrowhead) (HE). (B) Broncho-alveolitis in NiV-infected cat, with bronchiolar epithelial syncytial cells (arrows) and intraluminal debris (arrowhead) (HE). (C) Positive staining for NiV antigen in regions of alveolitis, including endothelial syncytial cells (arrows) (anti-NiV polyclonal antibody). (D) Positive staining for NiV antigen in bronchiolar epithelial cells (arrows) and intraluminal debris (arrowhead) (anti-NiV polyclonal antibody). Scale bar for all images = 50 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. NiV genome in cats detected by TaqMan PCR. Normalized, relative NiV genome levels in samples collecting during NiV infection in cats and at necropsy. TaqMan PCR CT values were determined in triplicate for the NiV genome and normalized by dividing this value by the 18S rRNA CT values for each sample. The relative NiV genome was determined by linear regression of NiV cDNA standard curves for each assay. Values are expressed as the average of all replicates. The adrenal gland, liver, lung, spleen, and lymph nodes consistently displayed the highest relative NiV genome levels, while the brain and heart frequently revealed the lowest. The genome was detectable in the blood in all cats 1 day prior to euthanasia but only detectable in the urine from cats infected with 5,000 TCID50 of NiV.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Normalized relative NiV genome levels detected by TaqMan PCR in NiV-infected naive catsa
|
With the exception of one lymph node (cat 1) and one oral swab (cat 2), all samples from which virus could be recovered had relative NiV genome levels at least 25-fold greater than the reference NiV cDNA. Clearly, these data underscore the poor sensitivity of direct virus isolation compared to TaqMan PCR as techniques for virus detection. This anomaly between TaqMan PCR and virus isolation data was most notable in the adrenal samples, which revealed very high relative genome levels but did not enable virus isolation.
In summary, the results of this susceptibility study indicated that NiV infection in cats induced a reproducible pathology with either a 500 or a 5,000 TCID50 of virus. Consistent with previous observations of natural and experimental infection in a range of species, NiV pathogenesis was mediated primarily by a vasculitis, followed by progressive pulmonary epithelial involvement. Using TaqMan PCR, detection of viral genome was possible from a broad range of tissues and longitudinal samples over a predictable disease induction period. Importantly, we have defined 500 TCID50 of NiV as a sufficient inoculum to establish infection and produce clinical disease in cats. With these parameters in place, it was decided that for subsequent studies infection would be determined by the detection of NiV genome in blood (<40 CT), and clinical disease is defined as a temperature of >39°C sustained for more than 12 h, with or without an increase in cumulative daily clinical score.
sG immunization and Nipah virus challenge. Previously, we had demonstrated that the administration of purified sG as an immunogen in rabbits could elicit a potent neutralizing antibody response (8). For use as a vaccine in cats, we chose a standard immunization protocol using purified sG and CSIRO triple adjuvant (see Materials and Methods). Four animals (cats 5, 6, 7, and 8) were immunized with three doses of sG at 2-week intervals, and the animals were challenged with 500 TCID50 of NiV 2 months after the last immunization. Two unvaccinated naive cats (animals 9 and 10) were infected with 500 TCID50 of NiV concurrently. Immediately after the immunization protocol, vaccinated animals exhibited very high homologous serum neutralizing titers greater than 1:20,000, and heterologous titers ranged from >1:20,000 to 16-fold lower (Table 2). Retesting serum 2 months after the final immunization revealed no decrease in homologous titers, whereas there was a two- to eightfold drop in heterologous titers (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Serum neutralization titers in naive and sG-immunized cats
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Temperature recordings of naive and sG-immunized cats infected with NiV. (A) Two cats in the vaccine efficacy study were implanted with radiotelemetry temperature transmitters prior to NiV inoculation (arrow). Cat 10 became febrile (>39°C) 7 days postinfection, while cat 9 remained clinically normal until day 11, becoming febrile on day 12, and was euthanized on day 13. Rectal temperatures were recorded during sampling periods and are indicated for each cat (circles). (B) Three cats showed gradual but slight increases in temperature after NiV infection (arrow), while the fourth showed a gradual decrease over the course of the study. All immunized cats remained within normal physiological parameters up to 24 days p.i.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Normalized relative NiV genome levels in naive and sG-immunized catsa
|
|
|
|---|
The underlying systemic vasculitis observed in the present study was consistent with NiV infection in all susceptible animals, including humans (24, 37, 38). NiV genome was detected in the blood and serum 6 to 9 days postinoculation and in oral swabs and urine immediately prior to euthanasia, but virus was isolated infrequently from oral swabs and not from blood. Previous studies have indicated that considerable quantities of virus may be shed via the nasopharynx and in the urinary tract in cats (26). Here, the low frequency of virus isolation from nontissue samples may reflect the required earlier intervention during the course of disease undertaken in these studies, perhaps indicating that peak virus shedding occurs when clinical disease is well established. In the present study, cat 9, which was euthanized 13 days p.i., did show a large increase in NiV genome in urine prior to euthanasia. However, the early interventions combined with the 2-log decrease in virus inoculum used here may have significantly reduced the incidence and quantity of viral shedding.
The development of a TaqMan assay for the detection and quantitation of NiV genome represents a considerable advance in the assessment of virus dissemination. Given that virus isolation was only successful in about one half of tissue samples, previous studies reliant on virus isolation data as the primary indicator of tissue replication may have underestimated the extent of NiV dissemination. As expected, the lungs appear to be a primary site of viral replication, and this was confirmed by extensive pulmonary pathology. In addition, lymphoid tissues (lymph nodes and spleen) and highly vascularized tissues displayed high relative quantities of NiV genome, confirming the description of NiV pathogenesis as a systemic vasculitis (26). Surprisingly, adrenal tissue revealed very high genome levels but appeared to be refractory to virus isolation attempts. While this observation requires a more detailed investigation, it may indicate a role for hormonal inhibition of NiV infection, both in vitro and in vivo. It was also noteworthy that no distinct differences were observed between the two dosage groups with respect to incubation period, lesion severity, or routes of viral shedding.
Consistent with previous observations of NiV infection in cats and in contrast to NiV infection in pigs and humans was the apparent lack of neurological signs, despite the demonstration of NiV genome in brain tissue. Middleton et al. (26) described a moderately severe, diffuse meningitis in cats infected oronasally with 50,000 TCID50 of NiV, an observation not seen in the present study, perhaps in part due to the earlier interventions used here. There are a number of other possible reasons for this discrepancy, such as differences in virus passage history, route of inoculation, stage of disease, and dose of inoculum. Previous experiments in cats utilized a low-passage human isolate, whereas here the same isolate after two rounds of plaque purification was used. Further, although Weingartl et al. (33) observed NiV infection of olfactory cells and cranial nerves in pigs, the oronasal route of administration and the high titers (50,000 TCID50) used differ considerably from the parenteral, low doses described here.
The present results indicate that cats are highly susceptible to NiV infection with doses as low as 500 TCID50 and that infection consistently results in severe clinical disease that retains a number of parallels with NiV infection in other species. NiV infection in cats reliably manifests as a systemic disease with arterial endothelial tropism and a tropism for respiratory epithelium, showing little individual animal variability. The routes of viral shedding and/or transmission evident in cats are comparable to those postulated for pigs (26), while recent NiV outbreaks in Bangladesh suggest the possibility of human-to-human transmission via exposure to infectious human secretions (5). The ability to compare clinical samples between several species will be important in evaluating the relevance of vaccine and therapy models.
Utilizing this animal model, we evaluated a subunit vaccine candidate based on the G glycoprotein. It is almost without exception that all neutralizing antibodies to enveloped viruses are directed against the virus' envelope glycoproteins. Anti-G MAbs have been shown to be exceptionally potent in neutralizing NiV- and HeV-mediated fusion, as well as live virus infection (40), and a greater potency of NiV anti-G over anti-F MAbs in conferring passive protection of hamsters from NiV disease has recently been demonstrated (23).
Here we have shown complete protection from NiV infection in cats by immunization with sG derived from either NiV (homologous) or HeV (heterologous). The present findings indicate that both NiV and HeV sG are highly immunogenic in cats, similar to findings obtained in mice and rabbits, yielding homologous serum neutralizing titers of greater than 1:20,000 in cats. These levels of anti-G antibody titer were generated by a moderate immunization protocol of only three 100-µg doses of protein in adjuvant. Despite the somewhat lower heterologous neutralizing titers observed here, in particular for animals immunized with HeV sG, both immunogens completely protected against subsequent NiV challenge, suggesting that a single vaccine may be effective against both viruses. It will be of interest to confirm this notion in an immunization and challenge study with HeV. The NiV genome was demonstrated at very low levels in one cat immunized with HeV G. While this animal had considerably lower neutralizing titers than its homologous counterparts, potentially explaining these observations, caution must be exercised in interpretation of such high CT values (>40). Certainly, the absence of detectable viral genome in blood samples obtained during the course of the experiment and the absence of viral antigen immunohistologically indicates that negligible infection had occurred in vaccinated animals. While the optimum vaccine preparation and immunization regime remains to be elucidated, the results shown here clearly demonstrate that a subunit vaccination strategy appears to be possible for the prevention of infection by these highly lethal zoonotic agents. At present, in the absence of any available antiviral therapeutic modalities, vaccination of high-risk populations against NiV may prevent associated epidemic disease, whether of natural or malicious origin.
We thank S. Crameri, R. Van Driel, and D. Magoffin for help caring for the cats during the 8-week vaccination protocol; Mark Rechenberg for writing the Visual Basic code for radio telemetry implementation; and Dayna Johnson for implanting the temperature transmitters in cats for the vaccine efficacy study.
The views expressed here are solely those of the authors and do not represent official views or opinions of the U.S. Department of Defense or The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Published ahead of print on 27 September 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»