Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2006, p. 11699-11709, Vol. 80, No. 23
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00779-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine,1 Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, Washington 981952
Received 17 April 2006/ Accepted 21 August 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability of Rep68/78 to mediate integration into AAVS1 has been harnessed for site-specific integration of transgenes from cotransfected dsDNA plasmids. The frequency of AAVS1-specific integration by these plasmid-based methods has differed from 20 to 50% among studies when integration frequency was measured based upon drug selection (2, 8, 14). However, plasmid transfection is not an efficient method for gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells. The production of Rep-expressing viral-gene transfer vectors (based on adenovirus or herpes simplex virus type 1), however, is problematic, because expression of Rep in packaging cells has been shown to severely reduce vector production (10, 21, 22). The vector yield could be increased by placing the rep gene under the control of promoters with low activity in packaging cells (21) or by using Tet- or Cre/Lox-inducible gene expression systems (17, 22). Our goal was to deliver both a transgene under the control of the globin locus control region (LCR) and the rep78 gene with adenovirus vectors containing Ad group B fiber knob domains. Our group and others have previously shown that these vectors efficiently transduce important gene therapy targets that are refractory to infection with commonly used Ad type 5 (Ad5) vectors, including hematopoietic stem cells (18, 20, 28, 29, 38). Because transduction of primary cells, particularly primary hematopoietic stem cells, with first-generation recombinant Ad vectors with E1/E3 deleted is associated with toxicity due to viral-gene expression (27, 33), we used helper-dependent (HD) Ad vectors, which are devoid of all viral genes (12), in our studies. We have previously shown that HD vectors containing B-group serotype 35 fiber knob domains (HD-Ad5/35) efficiently transduced human leukemia cells and primary CD34+ cells (27, 33). In this study, we analyzed Rep-mediated rescue and site-specific integration upon cotransduction of Mo7e cells with HD-Ad5/35 vectors containing the rep78 gene and a 27-kb-long transgene cassette.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Structures of helper-dependent Ad vectors. All vectors possess Ad5/35 capsids and contain the ß-globin LCR and ß-globin 3' HS1 region as stuffer DNA. , Ad packaging signal; HS, DNase I hypersensitivity region.
|
The following plasmids were employed as rescue substrates. pAd.AAV-LCR-GFP (which was used to generate the Ad.LCR-CMV-GFP virus) is a 42.7-kb plasmid yielding a 27-kb rescue product. pAd.AAV(2)-HS5 (10.3 kb) and pAAV-HS5 (10.5 kb) both yield a 6.5-kb rescue product. pAAV(2)-HS5 contains the HS5 fragment of the ß-globin LCR, the ß promoter-GFP cassette, and the 3' ITR of AAV2. p3'HS1-AAV (24) was digested with SalI and XhoI and ligated with the PstI/SalI fragment containing the ß-GFP-pA cassette from pBS-ß-GFP (33) and the SalI/PstI fragment containing the HS5 region from pAd.LCR-GFP. The 5' ITR of AAV2, derived from p
E1.IRS.RSV.hAAT.ApoE (4), was inserted downsteam of the GFP gene (pAAV-HS5-ßGFP-AAV). pAd.AAV(2)-HS5 was generated by inserting a ClaI/FseI fragment of pHS5-ßGFP-AAV into the ClaI/FseI sites of pBS-Ad-5'AAV (33).
Cells. Culture media (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, Iscore's modified Dulbecco's medium, and RPMI 1640) were purchased from GIBCO/BRL (Gaithersburg, MD). Fetal calf serum (FCS) was from HyClone (Logan, UT). The human leukemic cell lines Mo7e, HEL, and K562 (ATCC 45506) were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 µg of streptomycin per ml. For culturing Mo7e cells, 0.1 ng/ml of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (Avigen, Seattle, WA) was added to the medium. 293 (human embryonic kidney; Microbix, Toronto Canada) and C7-cre (9) cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, and 1x penicillin-streptomycin solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif). C7-cre cells were used for propagation of HD-Ad vectors; 0.5 mg/ml G418 and 100 µg/ml hygromycin were added to maintain Cre, polymerase, and pre-terminal protein expression.
Cloning of transduced Mo7e cells.
A total of 2 x 105 Mo7e cells were infected with HD-Ad vector at the indicated multiplicities of infection (MOI). Twenty-four hours postinfection, the cells were diluted and seeded onto 96-well plates at 0.5 cell/well. Two to 3 weeks later, when the number of cells in the colonies reached 2 x 103 to 3 x 103, the wells containing GFP-positive cells were counted and the percentage of GFP-positive cells in each clone was estimated. Clones with more then 30% GFP-positive cells were sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorter. The sorted cells were further expanded to
107 cells for Southern analysis.
Western blot analysis of Rep78 expression. To detect the Rep78 protein, lysates of transduced 293 or Mo7e cells were incubated with a mouse monoclonal anti-AAV-2 Rep78 antibody (catalog no. 03-61073; American Research Products, Inc., Belmont, MA). Complexes were pulled down with protein G-Sepharose beads (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The proteins were blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes and probed with the mouse monoclonal anti-AAV-2 Rep78 antibody (catalog no. 03-61071; American Research Products), followed by anti-mouse immunoglobulin horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody.
Southern blot analyses. Total cellular DNA was extracted from cultured cells by pronase digestion, followed by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, and 10 µg of total DNA was subjected to Southern blot analysis as described before (33). 32P-labeled DNA probes were used for hybridization and are described in the figure legends. The HS5 probe was a 972-bp MscI/SacI fragment derived from the human ß-globin LCR HS5; a 3' HS1 probe was the 938-bp BglII/HindIII fragment derived from the human ß-globin 3' HS1. The AAVS1 probe was a 1.6-kb EcoRI/BamHI fragment from pRE2 (24).
Analysis of integration sites. Integration into AAVS1 was analyzed by nested PCR of cellular DNA isolated from GFP-expressing clones. The following primers were used: vector-specific primers, AAV-1 (5'-GATACCGTCGACCTCGATCTCAGGAAC-3') and AAV-0 (5'-CGATCTCAGGAACCCCTAGTGATGGAGTTG-3'); AAVS1-specific primers, P1a (5'-GCTGTCCAGTCGAATTCCTAACTGC-3' and P1b 5'-GGCAGTCTGCTATTCATCCCCTTTAC-3'), P2a (5'-AGAGTAGGTCGAAGGGGAATGGTAAGGAG-3') and P2b (5'-CAGAGTGGTCAGCACAGAGTGGCTAAG-3'), and P3a (5'-GTCTCTCTCCTGAGTCCGGACCACTTTG-3') and P3b (5'-ACCACTTTGAGCTCTACTGGCTTCTGC-3').
PCR was performed with one primer specific to the vector (universal for both the 5' end and the 3' end) and the other primer specific to the AAVS1 region, with the following conditions: 95°C for 2 min and 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min. The PCR products were diluted 1:100, and nested PCR was performed under the same conditions using a second set of primers. PCR fragments obtained from different clones were cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Madison, WI), and junctions were sequenced using vector-specific primers.
|
|
|---|
Rep78 expression from Ad.LCR-rep78 virus after infection of 293 and Mo7e cells was analyzed by Western blotting using Rep-specific antibodies (Fig. 2). Rep78 was clearly detectable in both cell lines. The presence of a less intense band with a molecular mass of
50 kDa indicated that the mutation of the Rep52/40 start codon (see Materials and Methods) did not completely abolish Rep52 expression. Notably, the relatively high Rep78 expression levels in 293 cells could be due to coreplication of Ad.LCR-rep78 genomes by residual first-generation helper virus present in the HD-Ad vector preparation. Furthermore, we were not able to produce HD-Ad vectors that contained the rep78 gene under the control of the phosphoglycerate kinase or CMV promoter, and we speculate that Rep78 levels expressed from these promoters affect Ad replication/packaging. Significant differences in levels of transgene expression were demonstrated when 293 cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP (containing the GFP gene under the control of the LCR-ß-globin promoter) and Ad.HCA-CMV-GFP (containing the GFP gene under the control of the CMV promoter) (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, analysis of Rep78 levels by Western blotting upon transfection of 293-Cre7 cells with pCMV-Rep78 and pBSß-Rep78 (which contains the 1.6-kb beta promoter and not the LCR) revealed higher Rep78 levels in pCMV-Rep78-transfected cells (Fig. 2C).
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Rep78 protein expression and activities of LCR-ß and CMV promoters in 293 cells. (A) Detection of Rep78 protein expression upon HD-Ad infection. 293 and Mo7e cells were infected with Ad.LCR-rep78 virus and control virus (Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP) at an MOI of 400 genomes/cell. At 60 h postinfection, cells were collected and subjected to immunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis with Rep78-specific antibodies. (B) Transient GFP expression in 293 cells. 293 cells were infected with Ad.LCR-ß-GFP and Ad.HCA-CMV-GFP (33) HD vectors at increasing MOIs; 48 h postinfection, the percentage of GFP-expressing cells (top) and the mean fluorescence (bottom) were analyzed by flow cytometry. The error bars represent standard deviations. (C) Rep78 expression in 293 cells after plasmid transfection. 293 cells were transfected with pCMV-Rep and pBS ß-Rep plasmids (see Materials and Methods). Cells were harvested 72 h after transfection and analyzed by Western blotting.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Rep78-mediated rescue in 293 cells. (A) 293 cells were transfected with pAd.AAV(2)-HS5 (a 10.3-kb plasmid yielding a 6.5-kb rescue product), pAAV-HS5 (a 10.7-kb plasmid yielding a 6.5-kb rescue product), or pAd.AAV-LCR-GFP (a 42.7-kb plasmid yielding a 27-kb rescue product), together with pBS-ß-Rep and pHelper (an AAV helper-free system; Stratagene) plasmids. Seventy-two hours after transfection, cells were collected, and 15 µg total cellular DNA was digested with SacI and analyzed using an HS5-specific probe. M, monomeric rescue product (5' SacI fragment); D, dimeric rescue product (5' SacI fragment). (B) (Lower left) 293 cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP at an MOI of 200 genomes/cell and Ad.LCR-rep78 at increasing MOIs of 0, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 genomes/cell (Ad.Co was used to bring the total MOI to 200 genomes/cell). Forty-eight hours after infection, cells were harvested and total cellular DNA was extracted; 15 µg DNA was digested with SacI for Southern blot analysis using an HS5 probe. (Lower right) 293 cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP at an MOI of 200 genomes/cell and coinfected with Ad.LCR-rep78 at an MOI of 100 genomes/cell (lanes 2, 4, and 6) or coinfected with control virus (Ad.Co) at an MOI of 100 genomes/cell (lanes 1, 3, and 5). Forty-eight hours after infection, cells were harvested, total cellular DNA was extracted, and 15 µg of DNA was digested for Southern blot analysis with a 3' HS1 probe or an HS5 probe (see the vector scheme above). Lanes 1 and 2 show DNA digested with Bgl II; lanes 3 and 4 show DNA digested with EcoRI; lanes 5 and 6 show DNA digested with SacI.
|
200 particles per cell) resulted in detectable rescue in Mo7e cells in a dose-dependent manner. This effect of coinfected first-generation Ad was nullified by the addition of hydroxyurea, an inhibitor of adenoviral DNA replication (Fig. 5B). Coinfection of first-generation Ad could increase rescue due to (i) coreplication of Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP and generation of single-stranded vector genome intermediates, which are potentially better targets for Rep78-mediated rescue; (ii) coreplication of Ad.LCR-rep78 genomes, resulting in increased Rep78 expression; and/or (iii) expressed viral proteins (expressed from first-generation Ad vectors upon transduction) that act in trans to support rescue or to stabilize Rep78. In an attempt to distinguish between these possibilities, we performed plasmid transfection experiments (which exclude viral DNA replication). The helper functions of Ad for AAV replication are well characterized and are supplied by E1a, E1b, E2, E4, and the virus-associated (VA) RNA (23). Since we observed rescue using Ad vectors with E1 deleted as "helpers" in Mo7e cells, we formally excluded the possibility that E1 proteins support rescue. We obtained or generated plasmids that express DNA-binding protein (DBP) (39), polymerase (26), or E4orf 6 (25) under the control of the CMV promoter. We also used the pHelper plasmid from Stratagene (35), which expresses a combination of E4, E2A, and VA RNA genes under the control of the endogenous viral promoters. We transfected 293 cells with pAd.AAV(2)-HS5 and a Rep78-expressing plasmid in combination with different plasmids that express Ad proteins (Fig. 5C). We found that Rep-mediated rescue was enhanced by coexpression of viral proteins from pCMV-DBP and pCMV-E4orf6. The greatest effect, however, was seen with pHelper that expressed a combination of Ad proteins.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Rep-mediated rescue in human leukemia cell lines. Mo7e, K562, and HEL cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP (300 genomes/cell) and Ad.LCR-rep78 (300 genomes/cell). Seventy-two hours after virus infection, cells were harvested and total cellular DNA was extracted. A total of 10 µg DNA was digested with SacI and subjected to Southern blotting with an HS5 probe.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Roles of Ad proteins in rescue. (A) Mo7e cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP (300 genomes/cell) and Ad.LCR-rep78 (300 genomes/cell). First-generation Ad5/35 virus was added at increasing MOIs: 0, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 1,000, and 1,200 genomes/cell. Forty-eight hours postinfection, total cellular DNA was extracted and digested with SacI. Southern blotting was performed with an HS5 probe. M, monomeric rescue product (5' SacI fragment); D, dimeric rescue product (5' SacI fragment). (B) Mo7e cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP virus (MOI, 300 genomes/cell), Ad.LCR-rep78 virus (MOI, 300 genomes/cell), or Ad5/35 (first-generation) virus (MOI, 1,000 genomes/cell). One set of cells was incubated with 10 mM hydroxyurea (HU) 1 h after infection to block viral DNA replication; 48 h after infection, cells were harvested and total cellular DNA was extracted. A total of 10 µg DNA was digested with SacI and subjected to Southern blotting with an HS5 probe. (C) 293 cells were transfected with plasmids pAd.AAV(2)-HS5 and pBS-ß-Rep and with one of the following plasmids: pCMV-DBP, pCMV-E4orf6, pCMV-pol, pCMV-pTP, or pHelper (an AAV helper-free system; Stratagene). At 72 h after transfection, total cellular DNA was extracted, digested with SacI, and subjected to Southern blotting using an HS5 probe.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Analysis of transduction and integration in Mo7e clones infected with Ad.LCR-GFP and Ad.LCR-rep78 or Ad.Co. (A) Mo7e cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP at an MOI of 300 genomes/cell and Ad.LCR-rep78 (gray bars) or control virus, Ad.Co (black bars), at an MOI of 300 genomes/cell. Thirty-four hours after infection, the infected cells were diluted and plated as single cells in 96-well plates. Three weeks later, GFP-positive colonies that stably expressed GFP were analyzed. (B) Mo7e GFP-positive cell clones from cells infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP and Ad.Co. A total of 15 µg genomic DNA was digested with EcoRI and analyzed by Southern blotting with an AAVS1-specific probe (a 1.6-kb EcoRI/BamHI fragment from pRE2). (C) Mo7e GFP-positive cell clones derived from cells infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP and Ad.LCR-rep78. The encircled bands marked with stars appear in both plots hybridized with the AAV-S1 and HS probes. A total of 15 µg genomic DNA from each GFP+ clone was digested with EcoRI and hybridized with an AAVS1-specific probe or HS5 and 3'HS1 probes.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Comparison of mean fluorescence for GFP+ clones that did or did not integrate into AAVS1. The integration copy number of each GFP+ clone was determined by Southern blotting as described earlier (33). Only clones with one integrated vector copy are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Analysis of integration sites. (A) Schematic representation of nested PCR. AAV-0 and AAV-1 are vector-specific primers; P1a, P1b, P2a, P2b, P3a, and P3b are AAVS1 region-specific primers. (B) Schematic representation of integration sites found on chromosome 19. Nested PCR was performed with vector-specific primers and an AAVS1-specific primer. (C) Summary of AAVS1 integration sites. Nested PCR was performed with one primer specific to the vector (universal for both the 5' end and the 3' end) and a second primer specific to the AAVS1 region. XX, additional nucleotides that were not homologous to the viral genome or chromosomal DNA. (D) Analysis of integration sites outside the AAVS1 region by inverse PCR was performed as described before (33). The UCSC Genome Browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/) was used to perform alignments of identified integration sites.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Analysis of stable GFP expression in clones. Mo7e cells were infected with Ad.AAV-LCR-GFP (gray bars) or Ad.LCR-GFP (black bars) at an MOI of 300 genomes/cell and Ad.LCR-rep78 at an MOI of 800 genomes/cell. Thirty-six hours after infection, the cells were diluted and plated as single cells in 96-well plates. Three weeks later, GFP-positive colonies that stably expressed GFP were analyzed.
|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we used an LCR-containing HD-Ad vector to express Rep78. Considering data from a previous study, this type of vector integrates into the host genome, preferentially into chromosome 11 (33). However, in all GFP-expressing clones that were used for integration studies, we did not detect Rep78 expression by Western blotting. We speculate that clones with high-level Rep78 expression died off due to Rep-mediated toxicity. This is supported by the fact that the total number of clones that developed was two- to threefold lower for Ad.LCR-rep78-infected cells than in settings with Ad.Co. Furthermore, the percentage of GFP-expressing cells in all surviving clones was constant over time, underscoring that these cells did not have a proliferative disadvantage. Taking into account the fact that Ad.LCR-GFP-transduced cells died due to Rep expression, the overall stable Rep78-mediated transduction frequencies might be even higher than shown in Fig. 6A. Clearly, future efforts have to focus on controlling the timing and level of Rep78 expression. Furthermore, the Rep78-expressing vectors should contain scrambled fragments of X-chromosomal DNA. We have shown recently that this reduces the integration frequency about fourfold compared to HD-Ad vectors containing the globin LCR (33).
Based on previous AAV integration studies (2, 36, 37), we assumed that Rep-mediated nicking within the chromosomal AAVS1 site and within the vector AAV ITRs is necessary for efficient site-specific transgene integration. However, our hypothesis proved to be wrong. Our integration site analysis indicates that free ends within the vector genome can be created by single-strand or double-strand breaks within the Ad ITRs, whose structure is apparently recognized by cellular "nicking" enzymes. Nicking within the Ad ITR appears to occur more often (and more efficiently) than nicking within the AAV ITRs, and an Ad.LCR vector without AAV ITRs integrates as efficiently into AAVS1 as an Ad.AAV-LCR vector. Finally, we observed efficient vector integration into AAVS1 in Mo7e cells in the absence of detectable Rep78-mediated rescue. The only function of Rep78 in our system appears to be to mediate DNA breaks within the AAVS1 site. Our finding is in agreement with studies by Hamilton et al. and Philpott et al. reporting that the presence of AAV ITRs and nicking within these ITRs is not required and that an integration efficiency element (p5IEE) located in the AAV p5 promoter sequence is the sole cis requirement for high-efficiency integration of plasmid DNA into AAVS1 (8, 19). However, the role of p5IEE is not absolute, as our study has shown. It remains to be tested whether p5IEE could increase the integration frequency of our Ad.LCR vectors into AAVS1. It is also notable that omitting AAV ITRs in Ad.LCR vectors greatly simplifies vector construction and high-titer vector production, as AAV ITRs often tend to rearrange and induce vector genome instability. Importantly, it is thought that the ability of Rep78 to stimulate double-strand breaks within chromosomal DNA is a prerequisite to achieving vector integration in (quiescent) hematopoietic stem cells.
Although Ad.LCR-rep78-mediated rescue was efficient in 293 cells, no rescue products were detectable in Mo7e cells in Southern blot analyses. We attributed this observation to the presence of low levels (<1%) of helper virus (with E1/E3 deleted) in HD-Ad preparations. Because 293 cells complement the E1 deletion, helper virus replicates in infected cells, which results on one hand in the production of viral proteins and on the other hand in coreplication of HD-Ad genomes. Our studies indicate that expression of Ad proteins, specifically DBP (E2a) or E4orf6, is sufficient to mediate Rep78-mediated rescue. This finding is not novel, as the helper functions of Ad have been well characterized and shown to be mediated by E1a, E1b, E2a, E4, and the VA RNA (23). It was thought that their predominant role was in regulation of gene expression for AAV proteins. Our data contribute to a better understanding of the functions of these proteins in Ad rescue. It is also interesting that DBP expression is sufficient for efficient rescue. DBP is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein encoded in the Ad E2a region. It is possible that DBP enhances binding by bringing Rep into contact with its substrate or by promoting multimerization of Rep (34). Interestingly, there are a number of cellular proteins with similar functions. These include RPA (replication protein A), a heterotrimeric cellular complex that is involved in both replication and repair of cellular DNA (reviewed in reference 11). We speculate that the amount/activity of RPA vary between cell types, and it would be interesting to test whether the transient overexpression of Ad DBP would increase the Rep78-mediated integration frequency of the Ad.LCR-GFP vector.
Integration of wild-type AAV has been associated with rearrangements in the AAVS1 locus, including both duplications and deletions (6). In our study, we found transgene integration spread over the 5.3-kb AAVS1 site. Though the inaccuracy of integration and genomic rearrangements is a concern, epidemiological studies show widespread wild-type AAV infection (80% of humans are AAV seropositive), while no known pathologies, including neoplastic malignancies, have been reported (1).
This study is a proof of principle that targeted integration of a 27-kb globin LCR-driven transgene can be achieved at high frequency. It has implications for stem cell gene therapy.
This study was supported by NIH grants HL53750, HL-00-008, and R01 HLA078836 and by a grant from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation.
Published ahead of print on 20 September 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»