Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2006, p. 11447-11455, Vol. 80, No. 23
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.01032-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Center for Infectious Disease Research and Vaccinology, Department of Veterinary Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota 57007,1 Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, 1800 Denison Ave., Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506,2 Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., Ames, Iowa 50011,3 Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, ANRI, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland 207054
Received 19 May 2006/ Accepted 4 September 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
PRRSV is a small, enveloped virus containing a single positive-stranded RNA genome. The genome is about 15 kb in length and contains nine open reading frames. The protease and replicase-associated genes, ORF1a and ORF1b, situated at the 5' end of the genome, represent nearly 75% of the viral genome. The ORF1ab polyprotein of PRRSV is predicted to be cleaved into 13 nonstructural protein products, Nsp1
, Nsp1ß, and Nsp2 to Nsp12 (6, 29, 31, 33). The 3' end of the genome encodes four membrane-associated glycoproteins (GP2a, GP3, GP4, and GP5, encoded by subgenomic [sg] mRNAs 2 to 5), two unglycosylated membrane proteins (2b and M, encoded by sg mRNAs 2 and 6), and a nucleocapsid protein (N, encoded by sg mRNA 7) (1, 13, 14, 16, 17, 20, 22, 35).
PRRSV consists of two major genotypes, the European genotype (type 1) and the North American genotype (type 2), formerly located on different continents. More recently, type 1 PRRSV isolates (North American type 1) have been identified in U.S. swine herds. Previous studies (7, 26) indicate that this group of viruses possesses unique antigenic and genetic characteristics that are distinct from those of typical North American- and European-type PRRSV. A unique 51-bp deletion has been identified in the immunodominant region of Nsp2. Furthermore, the rapid appearance of this group of viruses since 1999 and the relatively large genetic diversity within the group indicate that this group of viruses is rapidly evolving and becoming well adapted in U.S. swine herds (7).
Several infectious clones have been produced for North American type 2 PRRSV isolates (3, 4, 24, 30). The first infectious clone of type 1 PRRSV was developed using the European prototypic strain, LV, isolated in 1991 in The Netherlands (15). Here, we report an infectious clone of North American type 1 PRRSV, pSD01-08. Compared to the LV infectious clone, pSD01-08 possesses several distinct biological properties: (i) the pSD01-08 infectious clone was derived from a parental strain isolated in the United States in 2001, which represents the most recently characterized North American type 1 PRRSV, (ii) the parental strain SD01-08 was isolated from a group of 8-week-old pigs showing no clinical signs, and (iii) SD01-08 possesses a unique 51-bp deletion in the immunodominant region of Nsp2 (7).
With the availability of this North American type 1 PRRSV infectious clone, we further explored its potential for the expression of foreign genes. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) was engineered into the unique 51-bp deletion site of the Nsp2 region, and the in vitro growth properties of these recombinant marker viruses were evaluated. This GFP-expressing infectious clone provides a system for studying type 1 PRRSV replication and pathogenic mechanisms in living cells.
|
|
|---|
RNA extraction, RT-PCR, and sequencing. MARC-145 cells were infected with plaque-purified viruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of approximately 0.1. After 3 days, the culture supernatant was layered onto a 0.5 M sucrose cushion and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 14 h in an SW41 rotor (Beckman). RNA was extracted from the pellet by use of a QIAamp viral RNA kit (QIAGEN). To obtain the full-length genome sequence of the parental virus, SD01-08, reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using primers that we described previously (26). Each RT-PCR product was directly sequenced at least two times from both directions to obtain the consensus sequences. To construct the infectious clone, nine overlapping fragments (Fig. 1) covering the full-length viral genome flanked by unique restriction enzyme sites were amplified by RT-PCR. The forward and reverse oligonucleotides for the RT-PCR amplification were initially designed based on the sequence of LV (GenBank accession number M96262 [18]) and later modified to match the SD01-08 sequence (Table 1). RT-PCR was performed using a method we described before (7). These RT-PCR-amplified fragments were gel purified and cloned in the PCR-Blunt II-Topo vector (Invitrogen). Three clones of each fragment were sequenced, and the clone containing the consensus sequence was used for infectious clone assembly.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Assembly of the full-length cDNA clone of a European-like PRRSV isolate, SD01-08. In the top scheme, the organization of the viral genome is shown, as are the positions of the unique restriction enzyme sites used for cloning purposes. The numbers 1A, 1B, and 2 through 7 indicate the PRRSV open reading frames. 5' indicates the 5' leader, and 3' indicates the 3' nontranslated region. The complete viral genome is divided into nine fragments (fragments a to i) flanked by unique restriction enzyme sites, represented by the horizontal lines. As shown in the bottom scheme, these fragments were individually cloned into the pACYC177 vector in alphabetical order. Prior to viral genome assembly, pACYC177 was prepared by inserting a stuffer fragment containing all of the matched restriction sites shown in the top scheme.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used for RT-PCR amplification
|
Assembly of full-length cDNA clone.
A low-copy-number plasmid, pACYC177 (GenBank accession number X06402), was modified by replacing the fragment between the BamHI and BglI sites with a stuffer fragment, which was prepared as a synthetic gene containing the restriction enzyme sites, as shown in Fig. 1. Each of the viral fragments was excised from PCR-Blunt II-Topo by use of restriction enzymes and ligated into the pACYC177 plasmid, which was digested with the same restriction enzymes. After each ligation step, the pACYC177 construct was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5
cells and grown overnight at 37°C in the presence of kanamycin. The completely assembled full-length cDNA clone was sequenced.
Insertion of a unique restriction enzyme site into the cloned virus. A ScaI restriction enzyme site was engineered into the ORF7 region of the cloned virus for discriminating between the cloned virus and parental virus. To create the ScaI restriction enzyme site, the silent mutation (G-to-T mutation) at nucleotide 42 of ORF7 (nucleotide 14588 of the SD01-08 genome) was generated using site-directed mutagenesis. Site-directed mutagenesis was achieved by an overlapping extension PCR technique (10, 11) using primer pairs E14059F/Sca1R and Sca1F/YFp503R. The mutated product was confirmed by DNA sequencing analysis.
GFP insertion. The pSD01-08-GFP clone was constructed by inserting the GFP gene sequence (Clontech) into the Nsp2 region (nucleotides 2420 and 2421) of the viral genome in the plasmid pSD01-08. The GFP gene was amplified from the pEGFP-N1 plasmid (Clontech) with forward primer gfpF and reverse primer gfpR. GFP was inserted by an overlapping extension PCR technique (10, 11) using primer pairs Nsp2F1/Nsp2R1 and Nsp2F2/Nsp2R2. The PCR product was digested with RsrlI and AclI restriction enzymes and ligated into the pSD01-08 plasmid, which was digested with the same restriction enzymes.
In vitro transcription and rescue of PRRSV. The plasmid pSD01-08 or pSD01-08-GFP was linearized with restriction enzyme XbaI. Capped RNA was transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase using an mMessage Machine kit (Ambion) and transfected to BHK-21 cells using DMRIE-C reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To rescue the virus, cell culture supernatant obtained 48 h posttransfection was serially passaged on MARC-145 cells. Rescue of infectious virus was confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) as described in our previous publication (26). Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) used in the IFA were developed in our laboratory, including MAb ES3-4 58-46, which specifically recognizes Nsp2 of SD01-08 (Y. Fang, B. Neiger, T. Hawkins, J. Christopher-Hennings, R. Rowland, and E. Nelson, Proc. Conf. Res. Work. Anim. Dis., abstr. 78, 2004); MAb MR39, which specifically recognizes the N protein of the North American type 2 PRRSV; and MAb SDOW17, which recognizes the N protein of both genotypes of PRRSV (21, 26). For rescue of GFP virus, the expression of GFP was also visualized directly under a fluorescent microscope.
Characterization of in vitro growth properties. Growth kinetics were examined by infecting MARC-145 cells with cloned virus and parental virus at an MOI of 0.1. Infected cells were collected at 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 h postinfection, and the virus titers were determined by IFA on MARC-145 cells and quantified as fluorescent focus units (FFU) per ml. Plaque morphologies of the cloned virus and parental virus were compared by plaque assay on MARC-145 cells. Confluent cell monolayers were infected with viruses at an MOI of 0.1. After 2 h, cell culture supernatant was removed and an agar overlay was applied. Plaques were detected after 5 days at 37°C and stained by using 0.1% crystal violet.
Animals/challenge groups. Twenty-one 4-week-old, PRRSV-naïve pigs from a certified PRRSV-negative herd were obtained and randomly divided into four groups housed separately in isolation facilities at Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica (BI), Ames, IA. After a 4-day acclimation period, pigs from each group (n = 6 for cloned-virus-infected group; n = 5 for the remaining groups) were inoculated intranasally with 1 ml 105 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) of cloned virus (group 1) or parental virus (group 2). The third group of animals was inoculated with the current modified live virus (MLV) Ingelvac PRRSV vaccine. The negative-control (group 4) animals were mock challenged with MARC-145 cell culture supernatant.
Clinical signs and serum and tissue sampling. Pigs were observed daily for clinical signs and body temperatures were taken for the first 7 days after infection. Blood samples were obtained from all pigs on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42. Serum samples were stored at 80°C for further tests. Two pigs from each group were euthanized at 21 days postinoculation (dpi) for postmortem analysis of acute infection. The remaining three pigs from each group were euthanized at 42 dpi. Lung lesions of the study animals were evaluated using a previously developed system based on the approximate volume that each lobe contributes to the entire lung: the left and right apical lobes, the left and right cardiac lobes, and the intermediate lobe each contribute 10% of the total lung volume, and the left and right caudal lobes each contribute 25%. These scores were then used to calculate the total lung lesion score based on the relative contributions of each lobe (9).
Quantification of viral load. For the detection of viral RNA and determination of viral load, serum samples from 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 dpi were examined using a real-time, quantitative PCR (Tetracore VetAlert PRRS [32]) which is routinely performed at the South Dakota Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (SDSU-ADRDL).
Determination of humoral immunity. All serum samples were evaluated for anti-PRRSV antibodies by use of an IDEXX HerdChek PRRS 2XR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a virus neutralization assay (VN). These tests are also routinely performed at SDSU-ADRDL under strict quality assurance guidelines.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The genome sequence of the full-length cDNA clone was deposited in GenBank under accession number DQ489311.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Nucleotide differences between the parental SD01-08 isolate and the full-length cDNA clone
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Rescue and passage of cloned North American type 1 virus SD01-08. (A) BHK-21C cells were transfected with in vitro-transcribed RNA from the full-length cDNA clone. (B, C, and D) MARC-145 cells were infected with cloned virus rescued from BHK. Cells were fixed and stained with PRRSV-specific MAbs at 48 h posttransfection (or postinfection): (A) anti-N MAb SDOW17, (B) anti-Nsp2 MAb ES3-4 58-46 (type 1 PRRSV specific), (C) anti-N MAb SDOW17, and (D) anti-N MAb MR39 (type 2 PRRSV specific). (E and F) PAMs were infected with parental virus (E) and cloned virus (F) and stained with anti-N MAb SDOW17.
|
To further compare the growth properties of the cloned and parental viruses, MARC-145 cells were infected with each of the viruses at an MOI of 0.1 and harvested at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hpi. Growth curve results showed that the cloned virus possessed growth kinetics similar to that of the parental virus (Fig. 3). Titers peaked at 48 hpi for both viruses. The peak titer of the cloned virus was 1.39 x 107 FFU/ml, versus 2.34 x 107 FFU/ml for the parental virus. Plaque morphology of these viruses was also determined, and the plaque size produced by the cloned virus was similar to that of the parental virus (data not shown). These results indicate that the cloned virus possesses in vitro properties similar to those of the parental wild-type virus.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Growth kinetics of cloned virus, parental virus, and GFP-expressing virus. MARC-145 cells were infected with each virus at an MOI of 0.1. At 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 hpi, cells were harvested and the virus titers were determined by IFA on MARC-145 cells.
|
![]() View larger version (70K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Differentiation between cloned virus and parental virus SD01-08. A ScaI restriction enzyme site was introduced in the full-length cDNA clone for distinguishing cloned virus from parental virus.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. In vivo characterization of cloned virus. Twenty-one 4-week-old, PRRSV-naïve pigs from a certified PRRSV-negative herd were obtained and randomly divided into four groups. Pigs from each group were inoculated intranasally with 1 ml 105 TCID50 of cloned virus (group 1, n = 6) or parental virus (group 2, n = 5). The third group of animals (n = 5) was inoculated with the current MLV Ingelvac PRRSV. The negative-control (group 4, n = 5) animals were mock challenged with MARC-145 cell culture supernatant. (A) Viral load in serum samples from different groups of pigs, quantified by real-time PCR. (B) Serum antibody responses of challenged groups of pigs, measured by IDEXX ELISA. S/P, sample-to-positive ratio.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Summary of serological and PCR results from sera of inoculated pigs at different days postinfection
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Percentages of lung with gross pneumonia lesions in infected pigs
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Schematic diagram of the pSD01-08-GFP construct. The pSD01-08-GFP clone was constructed by inserting the GFP gene sequence into the Nsp2 deletion region, between amino acids 733 and 734 of ORF1a of SD01-08 (arrow). Boxes show the B-cell epitope sites (ES) identified by Oleksiewicz et al. (25). The N-terminal 1 to 159 amino acids of GFP deleted by the virus are underlined. The two amino acids inserted by the virus upstream of GFP amino acid 160 are shown in bold type and parentheses.
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Fluorescence microscopy of GFP-expressing PRRSV. BHK-21C cells were transfected with in vitro-transcribed RNA. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cell culture supernatant was passaged on MARC-145 cells. (A) GFP expression in MARC-145 cells after 48 h of infection with the GFP virus. (B) MARC-145 cells were fixed and stained with anti-Nsp2 MAb ES3-4 58-46 and a Cy3-conjugated goat anti-mouse MAb (red). (C) Merged picture of images from panels A and B seen under confocal microscopy.
|
|
|
|---|
SD01-08 (GenBank accession number DQ489311) shares 94.1% identity with Lelystad virus at the nucleotide level. An important distinction between SD01-08 and LV is the growth properties in PAMs and monkey kidney cells. Results reported by Meulenberg et al. (15) showed that wild-type and cloned LV viruses grew well in PAMs but to low levels in the MA-104-derived cell line CL2621. Parental and cloned SD01-08 viruses grew equally well on PAMs and MARC-145 cells, another MA-104-derived cell line. The titer of SD01-08 cloned viruses peaked at 48 hpi, while LV cloned viruses grow to lower titers and had not peaked even at 96 hpi. Therefore, our SD01-08 infectious clone is the first type 1 infectious clone shown to replicate well in the continuous cell line, which provides a significant advantage for future reverse-genetics studies. Another difference between LV and SD01-08 is level of virulence. In PAMs, the LV cloned virus reached high titers, at 107.1 to 107.9 TCID50/ml, and peaked around 32 hpi. Our SD01-08 cloned virus reached the same titer as its parental virus in PAMs, but their titers were both lower than that of LV, reaching only about 104 TCID50/ml, and peaked later, around 72 hpi. This result suggests that the SD01-08 cloned virus may be less virulent than the LV cloned virus. This conclusion is supported by field observations and our experimental animal challenge study. SD01-08 did not cause significant clinical signs, and only mild pathological lesions were observed in the experimental infected pigs. In contrast, LV was reported to cause significant respiratory problems in pigs and abortions in sows (34). Due to the distinct characteristics of the pathogenesis and cell tropism of these two type 1 PRRSV infectious clones, future studies could be performed to determine the genomic regions responsible for virulence and cell tropism by using chimeric constructs between these two infectious clones.
In comparison to the parental virus, the cDNA clone contains two amino acid mutations in the nonstructural protein region (nucleotide 9492 at Nsp10 and nucleotide 11261 at Nsp11). These mutations may reflect a quasispecies in the virus stock or may have been introduced by RT-PCR and/or cloning procedures. The cloned virus showed in vitro growth properties similar to those of the parental virus. However, our animal experiment showed that the percentage of pathological lesions caused by the cloned virus is slightly lower than that of the parental virus. Preliminary studies on the expression of immune marker genes from pig peripheral blood mononuclear cells harvested at 35 dpi showed that cloned virus activated more immune marker genes than did parental virus (data not shown). Whether this in vivo difference that we observed was due to these two amino acid changes is a subject of investigation in our laboratory. In addition, due to the inherent genetic variation among individual pigs, our results need to be confirmed in repeated experiments with a larger number of pigs over multiple days postinfection.
One of the major applications of the infectious clone is as a viral backbone for constructing genetically engineered vaccines. Current PRRSV vaccines in the United States target mainly the North American type 2 isolates. The recent emergence of the North American type 1 PRRSV requires that vaccines be effective for both genotypes of PRRSV. An essential requirement for any live-virus vaccine is that it be low virulence, inducing no or, at most, very mild disease manifestations. Our cloned virus is likely to fulfill this requirement. As we discussed before, the parental virus SD01-08 was isolated from a group of pigs showing no clinical signs. Pathogenesis studies in our laboratory further confirmed that SD01-08 possesses low-virulence properties at the acute phase of the disease, which suggested that the pSD01-08 infectious clone may be a potential low-virulence strain and suitable for future vaccine construction. Additional in vivo studies are required for more complete evaluation of the pathogenic properties of this cloned virus; in particular, we need to study the pathogenesis of this virus in the pregnant-sow model.
Besides its potential for vaccine construction, one of the important applications of the infectious clone is the study of the basic viral biology in vitro. GFP commonly serves as a reporter gene to facilitate such studies, since it can be used to monitor virus entry and replication in living cells. For hepatitis C virus, GFP was inserted into Nsp5A, which allowed direct visualization of functional hepatitis C virus replication complexes for studying the assembly and disassembly of functional HCV replicases in living cells (19). In this study, we engineered GFP into the unique 17-amino-acid deletion region of Nsp2. The cloned virus with the GFP insertion was still able to replicate in cell culture. This result demonstrated the flexibility of this viral protein and of the PRRSV RNA replication machinery. Currently, little is known about the mechanism of PRRSV replication. Individual nonstructural protein proteolytic processing products and their functions relating to genome replication and viral assembly have been deduced from the study of equine arteritis virus and have not been determined specifically for PRRSV. This pSD01-08 infectious clone with GFP expression in the Nsp2 region is an attractive system for dynamic study of the function of nonstructural proteins in the formation and turnover of PRRSV replication complexes in vitro in living cells.
In conclusion, we successfully constructed a full-length cDNA infectious clone of a North American type 1 PRRSV and explored its potential as a viral backbone for foreign-gene expression. We believe that the availability of this infectious clone will have significant contributions for the future study of basic viral biology and development of the next generation of PRRSV vaccines.
Funding for this work was derived from USDA-NRI seed grant no. 2005-35204-16112, Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., the South Dakota Center for Infectious Disease Research and Vaccinology 2010 program, and the South Dakota Animal Disease Research and Diagnostic Laboratory.
Published ahead of print on 13 September 2006. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»