Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2006, p. 737-749, Vol. 80, No. 2
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.80.2.737-749.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Genetics,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology,2 Carolina Vaccine Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599,3 Viral Arthritis/Asthma Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia4
Received 25 August 2005/ Accepted 22 October 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Severe arthritis/arthralgia is a shared symptom of many of the alphavirus-induced diseases. The clinical course of RRV infection, which causes severe acute polyarthritis, is one of the best-characterized alphavirus-induced arthritic diseases. RRV-induced disease symptoms include fever, rash, myalgia, and pain and stiffness in the joints (13). Muscle and joint pain in afflicted individuals may persist for weeks to months, and anti-inflammatory drugs are the best current treatment for RRV disease (12, 13). The arthritic disease is thought to be initiated by viral replication and inflammatory infiltrates in the affected joints (7, 35). This is largely based on the detection of RRV RNA in the synovia from the knees of patients infected with RRV (35) and the detection of RRV antigen in synovial infiltrates from affected joints (6). RRV-induced arthritis is characterized by inflammatory infiltrates comprised largely of mononuclear cells. Characterization of these infiltrates suggests that monocytes/macrophages are a major constituent of the infiltrate (6, 14), while immunohistological studies of synovial biopsy samples have also identified CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes within the inflammatory infiltrates (35).
Although a large number of studies have focused on the pathogenesis of alphavirus-induced encephalitis, the mechanisms by which arthritogenic alphaviruses cause disease are largely unknown. Recently, Lidbury et al. reported that RRV-infected 17- to 21-day-old outbred mice developed severe disease characterized by inflammation of muscle tissue and muscle damage (22). That study demonstrated that disease signs, such as hind limb dragging and muscle pathology, were ameliorated following treatment of mice with macrophage-toxic agents, suggesting a critical role for host immunity and macrophages in mediating RRV-induced disease.
In this study, we utilized the mouse model of RRV disease described by Lidbury et al. (22) to identify the primary sites of RRV replication. In addition, we report that RRV-infected 24-day-old C57BL/6J (B6) mice developed severe disease characterized by inflammation of hind limb bone and joint-associated tissues as well as skeletal muscle tissue. Finally, to determine the contribution of adaptive immune responses to the development of RRV disease, we examined the outcome of RRV infection in C57BL/6J RAG-1/ mice, which lack functional T and B lymphocytes. In addition to elucidating mechanisms by which arthritogenic alphaviruses cause disease, these findings indicate that RRV infection of B6 mice represents a powerful animal model for studying virus-induced inflammation and immunopathology.
|
|
|---|
To generate an RRV that expresses the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), a second RRV 26S promoter sequence was inserted at the 3' end of the viral genome, followed by the coding sequence for EGFP. In brief, the 26S subgenomic promoter region of Ross River virus from nucleotides 7300 to 7507 of pRR64 was PCR amplified. The resulting PCR product had engineered sequential NotI and SpeI restriction sites 46 nucleotides downstream of the 26S RNA start site and was flanked by HindIII sites. This PCR product was introduced into position 11,330 in the pRR64 sequence to produce the plasmid pRR64(26S). The EGFP coding sequence was removed from plasmid pREP91Egfp (16) and introduced into pRR64(26S) using the NotI and SpeI restriction sites downstream of the second 26S subgenomic promoter to generate plasmid pRR64-Egfp. pRR64-Egfp was linearized with SacI and used as a template for in vitro transcription and virus production as described above for pRR64. EGFP expression in virus-infected cells was confirmed by fluorescence microscopy.
BHK-21 cells were grown in
-minimal essential medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% donor calf serum, 10% tryptose phosphate broth, and 0.29 mg/ml L-glutamine.
Mice. Specific-pathogen-free pregnant female outbred CD-1 mice at 13 to 15 days of gestation were obtained from Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Raleigh, North Carolina). C57BL/6J mice, C57BL/6J RAG-1/ mice, and µMT mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and bred in-house. µMT mice carry a stop codon and the neomycin gene cassette in the first transmembrane exon of the µ chain, resulting in B-lymphocyte deficiency (17). In some experiments, mice were obtained from the animal breeding establishment in the John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australia.Animal housing and care at UNC were in accordance with all UNC-CH Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Although RRV is classified as a biosafety level 2 pathogen, due to its exotic nature, all mouse studies in the United States were performed in a biosafety level 3 laboratory.
Mice were inoculated in the left rear footpad with 103 PFU of virus in diluent (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]-1% donor calf serum) in a 10-µl volume. Alternatively, in a subset of studies, mice received the virus subcutaneously in the thorax below the right forelimb in a 50-µl volume. No significant differences in viral replication or development of disease were detected in mice inoculated from either route. Mock-infected animals received diluent alone. Mice were monitored for disease signs and weighed at 24 h intervals. The clinical signs of disease were determined by assessing grip strength and altered gait. Grip strength and hind limb weakness were assessed by testing the ability of each mouse to support itself while suspended from a wire cage. Mice were scored as follows: 0, no disease signs; 1, ruffled fur; 2, very mild hind limb weakness; 3, mild hind limb weakness; 4, moderate hind limb weakness and dragging of hind limbs; 5, severe hind limb weakness/dragging; 6, complete loss of hind limb function; 7, moribund; and 8, death. To determine viral titers in tissues, mice were sacrificed by exsanguination and perfused with 1x PBS. The popliteal lymph node, right and left ankles, right and left quadriceps muscles, spleen, brain, and spinal cord (divided into thoracic and lumbar regions) were removed by dissection and weighed. Tissues were homogenized in 1x PBS supplemented with 1% donor calf serum, Ca2+, and Mg2+ and stored at 80°C until viral load was assessed by a standard plaque assay on BHK-21 cells.
For histological analysis, mice were sacrificed by exsanguinations and perfused with PBS-4% paraformaldehyde, pH 7.3. Following fixation of tissues and further decalcification of bone-associated tissues, all tissues were embedded in paraffin and 5-µm sections were prepared by the UNC histopathology core facility. To determine the extent of inflammation, tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E). Myelin was stained with luxol fast blue followed by a periodic acid-Schiff counterstain. Sections were analyzed using a Nikon Microphot-FXA microscope fitted with an Optronics DEI 750 three-chip charge-coupled-device camera for digital imaging.
In situ hybridization. In situ hybridization was performed as described previously (15). Briefly, a 35S-labeled RRV-specific riboprobe (complementary for RRV nucleotides 7300 to 7775) was generated with an SP6-specific MAXIscript in vitro transcription kit (Ambion) from a NotI-linearized plasmid. A riboprobe complementary for the EBER2 gene from Epstein-Barr virus was used as a negative control. Deparaffinized tissue sections were hybridized with 5 x 104 cpm/µl of 35S-labeled riboprobes overnight. Tissues were washed, dehydrated through graded ethanol, and immersed in Nitro Blue Tetrazolium autoradiography emulsion (Kodak). Following development, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and silver grain deposition was analyzed by light microscopy.
Flow cytometry.
Mice were inoculated as described above, sacrificed by exsanguination at 5 and 7 days postinfection (dpi), and perfused for 10 min with 1x PBS. Quadriceps muscles and spleens were dissected, minced, and incubated for 2 h with vigorous shaking at 37°C in digestion buffer (RPMI 1640, 10% fetal bovine serum, 15 mM HEPES, 2.5 mg/ml collagenase A [Roche], 1.7 mg/ml DNase I [Sigma]). Following digestion, cells were passed through a 40-µm cell strainer, red blood cells were lysed (spleens only), cells were washed in wash buffer (1x Hanks balanced salt solution, 15 mM HEPES), and total viable cells were determined by trypan blue exclusion. Cells were incubated with anti-mouse Fc
RII/III (2.4G2; BD Pharmingen) for 20 min on ice to block nonspecific antibody binding and then stained in fluorescence-activated cell sorting staining buffer (1x Hanks balanced salt solution, 1% fetal bovine serum, 2% normal rabbit serum) with the following antibodies from eBioscience: F4/80-fluorescein isothiocyanate, NK1.1-phycoerythrin, Ly6C/G (Gr1)-phycoerythrin, CD3-fluorescein isothiocyanate, CD4-biotin, CD19-allophycocyanin (APC), CD8
-APC, CD11b-APC, and B220-APC. Biotin conjugates were detected with streptavidin-peridinin chlorophyll protein (eBioscience). Cells were fixed overnight in 2% paraformaldehyde and analyzed on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson) using CellQuest software.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Ross River virus-induced disease in 15-day-old CD-1 mice. Fifteen-day-old CD-1 mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV ( ) by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. Mock-infected mice ( ) were injected with diluent alone. (A) Mice were scored for development of hind limb dysfunction and disease based on the following scale: 0, no disease signs; 1, ruffled fur; 2, very mild hind limb weakness; 3, mild hind limb weakness; 4, moderate hind limb weakness and dragging of hind limbs; 5, severe hind limb weakness/dragging; 6, complete loss of hind limb function; 7, moribund; and 8, death. (B) Mice were monitored for weight gain or loss at 24-h intervals. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (SD) for 7 (mock-infected) or 25 (RRV-infected) mice.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Ross River virus tissue titers in 15-day-old CD-1 mice. Fifteen-day-old CD-1 mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. At 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpi, ankle (A), quadriceps muscle (B), serum (C), brain (D), and spleen (E) were harvested and homogenized, and the amount of infectious virus present was quantified by plaque assay on BHK-21 cells. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean ± SD for three mice.
|
![]() View larger version (131K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Ross River virus replication within bone and joint-associated connective tissues and skeletal muscle tissue. Fifteen-day-old CD-1 mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV by subcutaneous injection in the ventral thorax. Mock-infected mice were injected with diluent alone. Mice were sacrificed at 24 (A, B, C), 48 (D, E, F), and 72 (G, H, I) hours postinfection and perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. Following decalcification, 5-µm-thick paraffin-embedded sections derived from the hind limbs were probed with 35S-labeled riboprobes complementary for RRV (A-I) or the EBER2 gene from Epstein-Barr virus (data not shown). M, muscle; B, bone. (A) RRV-specific in situ signal in tarsal bone periosteum. (B) RRV-specific in situ signal in synovial connective tissue of the knee joint. (C) Absence of RRV-specific in situ signal in hind limb skeletal muscle. (D) RRV-specific in situ signal in tarsal bone periosteum and associated skeletal muscle. (E) RRV-specific in situ signal in synovial tissue of a tarsal joint. (F) RRV-specific in situ signal in hind limb skeletal muscle tissue. (G) RRV-specific in situ signal in metatarsal bone periosteum and associated skeletal muscle. (H) RRV-specific in situ signal in hind limb tendon. (I) RRV-specific in situ signal in hind limb skeletal muscle.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Ross River virus double-promoter virus targets cells within joint, bone, and skeletal muscle tissues. (A) Schematic diagram of Ross River virus that was engineered to express EGFP by inserting a second RRV 26S subgenomic promoter at the 3' end of the viral genome followed by the EGFP coding sequence. (B) Ten- to 12-day-old CD-1 mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV-EGFP by subcutaneous injection in the ventral thorax. At 48 and 72 hpi, tissues were harvested and sections were analyzed for EGFP expression. SC, synovial cavity; M, muscle; P, periosteum. The white arrows indicate the articular surface. (Subpanel A) Synovial cavity in the foot at 48 hpi. (Subpanel B) Synovial cavity in the ankle at 48 hpi. (Subpanel C) Periosteum in the hind limb at 48 hpi. (Subpanel D) Hind limb skeletal muscle at 72 hpi.
|
Ross river virus infection causes severe hind limb disease in C57BL/6J mice. Previous studies of mice have suggested that RRV infection induces an immunopathological inflammatory disease (22). To understand the components of the host immune response and other host determinants that contribute to RRV-induced disease, we sought to characterize the outcomes of RRV infection in inbred strains of mice as a starting point for studies of mice deficient for specific host factors. RRV infection of 15-day-old C57BL/6J (B6) mice resulted in severe hind limb dysfunction similar to that observed following infection of 15-day-old outbred CD-1 mice. However, disease became increasingly severe, and 100% of 15-day-old B6 mice succumbed to infection (Table 1). Therefore, older mice were evaluated for susceptibility to RRV disease. Infection of 24-day-old B6 mice resulted in severe morbidity similar to that observed in 14- to 15-day-old CD-1 mice (Fig. 5 and Table 1). Disease signs following RRV infection of 24-day-old B6 mice included failure to gain weight (Fig. 5B) and progressive symmetrical hind limb dysfunction ranging from loss of hind limb gripping ability to very severe hind limb dragging (Fig. 5A). Disease signs, such as hunched posture, tremulousness, or spontaneous circling and falling, were not observed in RRV-infected mice. In addition, RRV-infected 24-day-old B6 mice appeared to completely recover from the disease by 25 to 30 dpi, as indicated by resumption of weight gain and an absence of observable disease signs (Fig. 5).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Morbidity and mortality following RRV infection
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Ross River virus infection induces severe hind limb disease in 24-day-old C57BL/6J mice. Twenty-four-day-old C57BL/6J mice were inoculated with 103 PFU of RRV ( ) by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. Mock-infected mice ( ) were injected with diluent alone. (A) Mice were scored for development of hind limb dysfunction and disease based on the following scale: 0, no disease signs; 1, ruffled fur; 2, very mild hind limb weakness; 3, mild hind limb weakness; 4, moderate hind limb weakness and dragging of hind limbs; 5, severe hind limb weakness/dragging; 6, complete loss of hind limb function; 7, moribund; and 8, death. (B) Mice were monitored for weight gain or loss at 24-h intervals. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean ± SD for three (mock-infected) or six (RRV-infected) animals. Data are representative of four independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Ross River virus tissue titers in 24-day-old C57BL/6J mice. Twenty-four-day-old C57BL/6J mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. At 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpi, the following tissues were harvested and homogenized and the amount of infectious virus present was quantified by plaque assay on BHK-21 cells. (A) , ankle of injected leg; , ankle of noninjected leg. (B) , quadriceps muscle of injected leg; , quadriceps muscle of noninjected leg. (C) Serum. (D) Spleen. (E) Brain. (F) , lower spinal cord; , upper spinal cord. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean ± SD for three mice.
|
![]() View larger version (160K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Ross River virus induces inflammation in hind limb bone and joint tissues of C57BL/6J mice. Twenty-four-day-old C57BL/6J mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. Mock-infected mice were injected with diluent alone. M, muscle; B, bone; P, periosteum; ST, synovial tissue. At 5 days (A and B) and 7 days (C and D) postinfection, mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde. Following decalcification, 5-µm-thick paraffin-embedded sections generated from ankle and foot tissues of mock-infected (A and C) and RRV-infected (B and D) mice were H & E stained. Images (magnification, x200) are representative of at least six mice per group.
|
![]() View larger version (95K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Ross River virus induces inflammation in hind limb skeletal muscle tissue of C57BL/6J mice. Twenty-four-day-old C57BL/6J mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. Mock-infected mice were injected with diluent alone. At 3, 5, 7, 10, and 30 dpi, mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde and 5-µm-thick paraffin-embedded sections generated from the quadriceps muscle were H & E stained. (A) Mock infection. (B) RRV infection at 3 dpi. (C) RRV infection at 5 dpi. (D) RRV infection at 7 dpi. (E) RRV infection at 10 dpi. (F) RRV infection at 30 dpi. Images (magnification, x200) are representative of three to six mice per group.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Characterization of Ross River virus-induced inflammatory infiltrates. Twenty-four-day-old C57BL/6J mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. Mock-infected mice were injected with diluent alone. (A) Cell surface staining of cells isolated from the quadriceps muscle at 5 dpi. Dot plots shown for each stain are representative of three mice. Two independent experiments gave similar results. (B) Cell surface staining of cells isolated from the quadriceps muscle at 7 dpi. Dot plots shown for each stain are representative of three mice per group. Three independent experiments gave similar results. (C) Total numbers of natural killer cells (NK1.1+/CD3+), inflammatory macrophages (F4/80+/Gr-1+), CD4 T lymphocytes (CD3+/CD4+), and CD8 T lymphocytes (CD3+/CD8+) from the quadriceps muscle of mock- and RRV-infected animals at 5 and 7 days postinfection. Data presented are the means ± standard errors of the means for three to four mice per group and are representative of at least two independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Ross River virus-induced inflammation and disease in RAG-1/. Twenty-four-day-old C57BL/6J RAG-1/ mice were infected with 103 PFU of RRV ( ) by subcutaneous injection in the left rear footpad. Mock-infected mice ( ) were injected with diluent alone. (A) Mice were scored for development of hind limb dysfunction and disease based on the following scale: 0, no disease signs; 1, ruffled fur; 2, very mild hind limb weakness; 3, mild hind limb weakness; 4, moderate hind limb weakness and dragging of hind limbs; 5, severe hind limb weakness/dragging; 6, complete loss of hind limb function; 7, moribund; and 8, death. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean ± SD for two (mock-infected) or six (RRV-infected) mice and are representative of two independent experiments. (B) Mice were monitored for weight gain or loss at 24-h intervals. Each data point represents the arithmetic mean ± SD for four (mock-infected) or six (RRV-infected) mice and are representative of two independent experiments. (C) At 10 days postinfection, mice were perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde and 5-µm-thick paraffin-embedded sections generated from the quadriceps muscle were H & E stained. Images (magnification, x200) are representative of three mice per group. (D) Total numbers and percentages of natural killer cells (NK1.1+/CD3) and inflammatory macrophages (F4/80+/Gr-1+) from the quadriceps muscles of mock-infected (black bars) or RRV-infected (gray bars) RAG-1/ mice at 7 days postinfection. Data presented are the means ± standard errors of the means for three mice per group and are representative of two independent experiments.
|
|
|
|---|
The detection of RRV in multiple bone and joint-associated tissues, such as synovial tissue, periosteum, tendons, and ligaments, has not previously been described. These findings are consistent with observations of RRV-infected humans in whom both viral antigen and viral RNA have been detected from synovial effusions and synovial biopsy samples (6). Additionally, infectious virus was detectable in the ankle joints of RRV-infected mice by plaque assay by 12 hpi; however, infectious RRV has not yet been recovered from the joints of RRV-infected patients (13). Similar to previous reports, high titers of RRV were also detected within skeletal muscle tissues of infected mice (22, 26, 31). However, our targeting studies demonstrated that there were very few RRV-infected muscle fibers in the hind limbs at early times postinfection. By 48 to 72 hpi, large areas of RRV-infected muscle fibers were observed in hind limb skeletal muscle tissue. These findings raise the possibility that RRV may initially infect joint- or skeletal muscle-associated connective tissues and subsequently spread into skeletal muscle myofibers. Direct infection of skeletal muscle tissue by RRV in humans has not been demonstrated, although 60% of patients diagnosed with Ross River virus disease experience myalgia (12). The route and spread of RRV from the initial site of infection to joint and skeletal muscle tissue have not been characterized fully. Studies performed with other alphaviruses, such as Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, have suggested that this group of viruses may initially infect skin dendritic cells (23). The infected dendritic cells migrate to the draining lymph node, where the virus undergoes additional rounds of replication and seeds a high-titer serum viremia, resulting in viral spread to target tissues.
Histological analyses of tissues from adult B6 mice revealed that RRV infection induced inflammation within joint-associated tissues, such as periosteum, tendons, and synovial tissue, as well as skeletal muscle tissue. Inflammatory infiltrates were first observed within these hind limb tissues at 5 dpi, peaked at 7 to 10 dpi, and were dramatically decreased in number by 20 to 30 dpi. The occurrence of inflammation within these tissues occurred well after peak viral titers and correlated with the observed hind limb weakness, which was first detectable at 4 to 5 dpi, became increasingly severe from 7 to 12 dpi, and resolved between 20 to 30 dpi. Although RRV has been reported to induce encephalomyelitis characterized by central nervous system demyelination in 1-week-old BALB/c mice (32), we found no evidence of virus-induced inflammation, demyelination, or other pathology in the brains or spinal cords of 24-day-old adult B6 mice. RRV infection of 7-day-old BALB/c mice was also proposed to cause muscle destruction in the absence of a host immune response (31), while immune pathology clearly contributes to virus-induced pathology in our system. The differences in mouse age and strain used in the two studies may explain the differences between our results and those previously reported. In addition, it has also been reported that, in contrast to 1-week-old BALB/c mice, 4-week-old BALB/c mice infected with RRV developed little to no disease signs (31), indicating there are age- and strain-dependent effects of RRV infection. Taken together, our findings suggest that the observed disease signs in 24-day-old B6 mice are most likely due to virus-induced pathology in hind limb tissues.
Consistent with previous work, our studies identified inflammatory macrophages as major constituents of the inflammatory infiltrate in hind limb skeletal muscles of RRV-infected mice. The presence of inflammatory macrophages, as well as a large increase of NK cells, was readily detectable by 5 dpi. By 7 dpi, increased numbers of both CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were also found within hind limb skeletal muscle tissue. Although our studies focused on the skeletal muscle, the cellular composition of inflammation identified is similar to what has been reported following RRV infection of humans. Both NK cells and macrophages have been detected within synovial exudates from the knees of RRV-infected patients (6, 14, 35). In addition, CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes were detected in synovial tissue sections generated from knee joint biopsies (35).
A recent study demonstrated that treatment of mice with macrophage-toxic agents prior to infection completely prevented RRV-induced muscle inflammation (22), suggesting an important role for innate immune responses in the development of RRV-induced disease. Our studies of RAG-1/ mice, which develop inflammation and disease similar to those of wild-type B6, underscore the importance of the innate immune response. However, we cannot rule out the possibility of a limited contribution of the adaptive response to the severity of disease. In addition, RAG-1/ mice recovered from RRV-induced disease with kinetics similar to that observed in wild-type B6 mice. Future studies will be aimed at determining whether innate immune mechanisms are sufficient to control RRV infection or whether other mechanisms are involved in the resolution of disease in RAG-1/ mice.
Infection of neonatal mice with the Tucson strain of coxsackievirus B1 (CVB1T) or 10- to 14-day-old mice with the DA strain of Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus has also been shown to induce severe myositis in hind limb skeletal muscle tissue (9, 28). Whereas the role of the immune response in Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus-induced disease is not well understood, T lymphocytes have been demonstrated to play a major role in CVB1T-induced disease (41), suggesting that RRV and CVB1T may promote muscle pathology by distinct mechanisms.
The mechanisms by which RRV or other arthritogenic alphaviruses trigger inflammatory responses are not understood. Interestingly, when injected directly into murine knee joints, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) (which is formed during the replication and transcription of RNA viruses such as RRV) is itself arthritogenic (42). In addition, similarly to the critical role of macrophages in the development of RRV-induced disease, depletion of monocytes completely prevented dsRNA-induced arthritis. T and B lymphocytes were also found to be dispensable for the development of dsRNA-induced arthritis (42). A number of different molecules have been demonstrated to contribute to the host's detection of viral dsRNA. Toll-like receptor 3 was not required for dsRNA-induced arthritis (42); therefore, it will be interesting to determine the role of other sensors of dsRNA in the development of RRV-induced disease, such as protein kinase R (4), or the newly identified caspase activation and recruitment domain-containing RNA helicases retinoic acid-inducible gene I (40) and mda-5 (1).
In addition to RRV, Chikungunya virus, O'nyong-nyong virus, and Mayaro virus, Sindbis group alphaviruses are also associated with arthritis and arthralgia in humans (10). However, studies of adult mice have demonstrated that infection with most Sindbis group alphaviruses results in encephalitic disease (11, 37). Recent work has demonstrated that Sindbis group alphaviruses, such as S.A.AR86 and TR339, replicated in bone and joint-associated tissues of adult CD-1 mice; however, virus-induced inflammation or other pathology was not observed within these tissues (15). Therefore, the RRV mouse model represents a unique system for studying the pathogenesis of alphavirus-induced inflammatory disease in bone, joint, and skeletal muscle tissue.
We thank members of the Carolina Vaccine Institute and the Johnston laboratory for helpful scientific discussions. We thank Nancy Davis for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Dwayne Muhammed and Kenya Madric for assistance with tissue culture; Janice Weaver, Robin Smith, and Wuhan Jiang at the LCCC/DLAM UNC histopathology core facility; and Kinuko I. Suzuki for histological analysis of brain and spinal cord tissue sections.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»