Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, October 2006, p. 9730-9740, Vol. 80, No. 19
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00246-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine,1 UCLA Molecular Biology Interdepartmental Ph.D. Program,2 UCLA School of Dentistry,3 AIDS Institute,4 Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center,5 California Nano Systems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095,6 Center for Infection and Immunity, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China7
Received 2 February 2006/ Accepted 11 July 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Herpesviruses undergo both lytic and latent phases of infection. Following primary lytic infection in epithelial cells and lymphocytes, gammaherpesviruses establish a life-long latent infection, with intermittent bursts of lytic reactivation (33, 35). This sporadic reactivation allows the virus to maintain a dynamic infectious reserve for transmission and secondary infection. During latent infection, the virus expresses a limited number of genes which promote the survival and proliferation of infected cells, resulting in transformation of a small percentage of cells (32). In KSHV, a subset of the transformed cell population supports spontaneous reactivation, leading to the expression of virally encoded cellular cytokine and chemokine homologues, including viral macrophage inflammatory proteins I, II, and III and viral interleukin-6 (11, 34, 37). These viral cytokines have a paracrine growth-promoting effect on neighboring infected cells; thus, lytic infection contributes to pathogenesis and tumorigenesis.
Based on a temporal gene expression pattern, herpesvirus lytic genes are classified as immediate early (IE or
), early (E or ß), and late (L or
) (20, 41). Following infection, the expression of IE genes is regulated by incoming virion-associated proteins and/or cellular transcription factors. The IE transcription factors ZEBRA (ZTA) and RTA in EBV (6, 12, 17) and RTA in KSHV and MHV-68 (27, 53, 58) initiate the lytic cascade by activating the expression of downstream early genes (e.g., MTA or ORF57) and modulating the cellular microenvironment. Transcription of early genes occurs in nuclear compartment ND10 or promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies (21, 29). Many early genes encode enzymes and factors required for viral genome replication. EBV-ZEBRA, KSHV-K8, RTA, and six other core DNA replication proteins, carried in KSHV by open reading frames (ORFs) 6, 9, 40, 41, 44, 56, and 59, are involved in viral genome replication. These proteins localize to a subnuclear domain, termed the replication compartment, where viral DNA synthesis, late gene transcription, and viral genome encapsidation take place (4, 18, 25, 47, 57). Following viral DNA replication, late genes coding for structural proteins are expressed (19, 30). A subset of late genes, early-late, or
1 genes is expressed preceding viral DNA replication, and their transcription rate is enhanced considerably during DNA synthesis. On the other hand, for expression of true-late or
2 genes, viral DNA replication is absolutely required in cis. These studies resulted in the notion that these two processes are coupled (41, 45).
The regulation of alphaherpesvirus lytic genes has been studied in detail. The herpes simplex virus (HSV) IE gene products ICP0, ICP4, ICP22, ICP27, and ICP47 have been shown to regulate downstream early and late lytic genes (44, 60, 15). Although the regulation of gammaherpesvirus IE and early gene expression has been studied extensively in tumor cell lines (8, 22, 49, 56), studies on the regulation of late gene expression have been limited by the lack of a robust lytic system. EBV late lytic gene promoter sequences essential for the regulation of late gene expression have been mapped using a plasmid containing a late promoter-reporter and origin of lytic replication (3, 43). Nevertheless, the viral factor(s) specifically controlling the transcriptional regulation of gammaherpesvirus late genes is unknown.
Using a library of signature-tagged MHV-68 mutant viruses, we identified 41 viral genes essential for completion of the virus life cycle (50). Though most of these essential genes are well characterized, the function of a conserved essential lytic gene, ORF18, is unknown. ORF18 is conserved among both beta- and gammaherpesviruses (14, 55). MHV-68 ORF18 has 39% and 28% amino acid identity to the KSHV and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) proteins, respectively. The betaherpesvirus ORF18 homologue, UL79, was identified as an essential gene for virus replication in genome-wide screens (14, 59). Our previous studies showed that during MHV-68 lytic infection, ORF18 is expressed as an early gene (28). In silico analysis of ORF18 revealed no cellular functional homology or conserved domains. ORF18 is neither a gammaherpesvirus virion protein (5, 7) nor a core viral DNA replication protein (4, 57).
To define the function of ORF18 during viral replication, we engineered an ORF18-null virus. The gene expression pattern of the ORF18-null virus was analyzed using viral DNA array, Northern blotting, Western blotting, and promoter-reporter assays, and the viral DNA synthesis was quantitated by real-time PCR. The results demonstrated an essential role for ORF18 in viral late gene transcription.
|
|
|---|
Plasmids. The suicide shuttle vector pGS284 was a kind gift from G. Smith and L. Enquist (Princeton University) (48). To introduce triple stop codons in MHV-68 ORF18 between nucleotides (nt) 30,066 and 30,067, a MHV-68 fragment corresponding to nt 29671 to 30503 was amplified in a two-step PCR. First, the homologous upstream and downstream sequences to the site of the stop codon insertion were amplified with primer pairs Pr1-Pr2 and Pr3-Pr4 (Table 1), respectively. Primers Pr2 and Pr3 were designed to contain triple stop codons and an AvrII restriction site with overlapping sequences. Finally, the homologous up- and downstream fragments containing the triple stop codons were amplified by crossover PCR with primers Pr1 and Pr4. This PCR fragment was cloned into NheI and XhoI sites of the shuttle vector (pGS284/18STOP). To construct the pGS284/wt ORF18 region, the PCR-amplified ORF18 region (primers Pr1 and Pr4) was inserted into NheI and XhoI sites of the shuttle vector.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used in this studya
|
N-13 (Pr16-Pr6),
N-57 (Pr17-Pr6),
N-108 (Pr18-Pr6),
N-163 (Pr19-Pr6),
C-16 (Pr5-Pr20),
C-101(Pr5-Pr21), and
N13-C16 (Pr16-Pr20) (Table 1) were PCR amplified and cloned into EcoRI-BamHI sites of pFLAG-CMV2. To delete the ORF18 basic (amino acids [aa] 138 to 149) and hydrophobic (aa 165 to 181) region, a two-step PCR was employed by using an oligonucleotide directed-mutagenesis method. Initially, to remove the basic region of aa 138 to 149 or the hydrophobic region of aa 164 to 182, the up- and downstream sequences of ORF18 were PCR amplified with primer pairs Pr5-Pr23 and Pr22-Pr6 or Pr5-Pr25 and Pr24-Pr6, respectively (Table 1). Subsequently, by crossover PCR using primers Pr5 and Pr6, the final mutated products were obtained and cloned into the EcoRI-BamHI sites of pFLAG-CMV2.
Firefly luciferase reporter genes driven by promoters of MHV-68 ORF26 or ORF65 were constructed by inserting a 1-kbp sequence upstream of the ATG of the corresponding genes into NheI-XhoI sites of pGL3-Basic plasmid (Promega). To amplify promoters of ORF26 and ORF65, the primer pairs Pr9-Pr10 and Pr11-Pr12 were used for PCR, respectively. Subsequently the ORF26 promoter or ORF65 promoter coupled to the luciferase coding region was PCR amplified by using Pr9 or Pr11 and Pr13 and cloned into the NaeI site of pMO
16, a plasmid containing the MHV-68 minimum origin of lytic replication (oriLyt) (13).
Construction of ORF18-null and ORF18 revertant MHV-68 (bacterial artificial chromosome [BAC]) plasmids. The wild-type (wt) MHV-68 (BAC) plasmid was used for construction of ORF18 stop codon insertion (18S) BAC by allelic exchange using the recA+ Escherichia coli strain GS500, harboring the target MHV-68 (BAC) plasmid, and conjugation-competent E. coli GS111, containing the donor suicide shuttle vector pGS284/18STOP as described previously (23). To generate ORF18 revertant (18R) BAC, the 18S BAC plasmid containing strain GS500 and the pGS284/wt ORF18 region harboring E. coli GS111 were used.
Generation of wild-type, ORF18-null, and ORF18 revertant MHV-68 (BAC) viruses. To generate virus stock, initially a Tet-inducible stable ORF18 cell line, 293FT-18, was established by transfecting Flp-in T-Rex-293 cells (Invitrogen) with CBP epitope and a 3x FLAG-tagged ORF18 mammalian Tet-inducible expression vector, pTAG18. To construct pTAG18 vector, primers Pr26, Pr27, Pr28, and Pr29 were used (Table 1). The cells were then selected with hygromycin (150 µg/ml) and blasticidin (5 µg/ml) (H. Deng and N. Reyes, unpublished data). The 293FT-18 cells were seeded into a 24-well plate at 4 x 104 cells/well in the presence of 0.2 µg/ml of tetracycline. At 24 h postplating, the Wt MHV-68 (BAC) plasmid, p18S (BAC) plasmid, or p18R (BAC) plasmid (0.5 µg/well) was transfected into the 293FT-18 cells using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen). At 5 days posttransfection, all three viruses produced cytopathic effect (CPE). The cells and supernatants were harvested, and intracellular viral particles were released by three cycles of freeze and thaw. Stocks for individual viruses were made after two rounds of amplification in 293FT-18 cells. The virus titer was assessed based on 50% tissue culture infectivity doses (TCID50) by infecting the 293FT-18 cells with 10-fold serially diluted viruses.
Quantitative PCR. One-hundred nanograms of DNA template and MHV-68 M1-specific primers Pr14 and Pr15 were mixed with 10x PCR buffer, Taq, and SYBR Green. MHV-68 BAC DNA (100 to 107 copies) was included as a standard for copy number determination. The reaction was run at 95°C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 10 s. The results were analyzed in an Opticon Monitor (MJ Research, Cambridge, MA).
Northern blotting and viral DNA membrane array hybridization. Total cellular RNA was harvested using Tri-reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). Northern blotting was done as described before (13). The following probes were used: ORF57 (corresponding to MHV-68 nt 76650 to 77139), M3 (nt 6060 to 7277), and ORF65 (nt 93962 to 94512). The viral DNA membrane array experiment was performed as described previously (28).
Replication kinetics analysis. The noncomplementing BHK-21 cells were seeded onto 24-well plates. The cells were inoculated with MHV-68 wt, 18R, or 18S virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 for the single-step growth curve and an MOI of 0.01 for the multiple-step growth curve. After 1 h of incubation, the virus inocula were removed and the cells were washed twice with DMEM. Subsequently, fresh DMEM was added, and this time point was considered 0 h postinfection (hpi). The cells and the supernatant were harvested at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hpi for single-step curves and at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 days postinfection for multistep growth curves. The samples were subjected to three cycles of freeze and thaw and were stored at 80°C. The virus titer was measured by limiting dilution assay in Tet-induced 293FT-18 cells.
Promoter-reporter assay. A total of 600 ng of reporter constructs pGL2-57pLUC (26) (kind gift from Samuel H. Speck), pGL3/M3promoter-LUC (28), pORI/ORF65 promoter-LUC, and pORI/ORF26 promoter-LUC was transfected with 20 ng of pRLSV40 construct into BHK-21 cells using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen). pRLSV40 contains the Renilla luciferase gene driven by the constitutively active simian virus 40 (SV40 promoter) and was used as an internal control. At 24 h posttransfection, the cells were reseeded into 48-well plates at 2 x 104 cells per well. The next day, the cells were infected with MHV-68 wt or 18S virus at an MOI of 5. Uninfected cells transfected with reporter constructs were included as a negative control. For phosphonoacetic acid (PAA; Sigma) treatment, 200 µg/ml of PAA was added to the wells during infection. At 24 hpi, the cells were lysed and both firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were assayed using the Dual Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). The firefly luciferase activities were normalized against Renilla luciferase values. Fold induction was calculated by comparing the normalized firefly luciferase activities of infected cells to that of uninfected cells.
Western blotting and antibodies. For Western blotting, the cell lysates were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Antigens were probed with primary rabbit polyclonal antibodies to ORF65 (1:500), MHV68 lytic antigens (1:2,000) (both generated in our laboratory), or mouse monoclonal antibody to FLAG (1:3,000; Sigma). Goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G conjugated with horseradish peroxide (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) secondary antibodies was detected by chemiluminescence (ECL Plus; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and the signals were detected and analyzed using a storm imaging system (Molecular Dynamics).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Analysis of recombinant viruses. (A) The location of ORF18 in the MHV-68 BAC (wt) genome is indicated. ORF18 and the flanking ORFs are shown with EcoRI (e) and AvrII (a) restriction sites. The 40-bp internal repeat sequence present in the M6 gene is shown as a striped box. (B) The position of stop codons and the AvrII insertion site in ORF18-null virus (18S) is depicted. The solid bar indicates the location of the probe used for Southern blotting. The EcoRI or AvrII restriction pattern of ORF18 locus is indicated. For AvrII, the fragments (sizes are in kilobase pairs) generated by 18S (below the line) and wt (above the line) viruses are shown. (C) Restriction profile of recombinant viruses. Five micrograms of viral BAC plasmids (two clones for each of 18R and 18S viruses) was digested with EcoRI or AvrII and separated on a 0.7% gel, and the DNA was visualized with UV after ethidium bromide staining. (D) Southern blotting of the EcoRI- or AvrII-digested viral BAC DNA. M, 1-kbp DNA ladder; TR, terminal repeat.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Rescue of ORF18-null virus by ORF18 trans-complementation. ORF18-null BAC plasmid (18S) was cotransfected into BHK-21 cells with (+) or without () complementing FLAG-tagged ORF18 expression vector. Wild-type MHV-68 (wt) and ORF18 revertant (18R) BAC plasmids were also transfected as positive controls. (Upper panel) At 5 days posttransfection, viral lytic antigen expression was analyzed by Western blotting using rabbit polyclonal anti-MHV-68 antisera. (Middle panel) Immunoblot probed with mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. The lower panel depicts a cellular cross-reacting antigen as a control. M, marker; UI, uninfected.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences of ORF18 homologues in murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV-68), Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), bovine herpesvirus 4 (BHV4), and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). The consensus sequence of the alignment is shown. Identical amino acid residues conserved among four viruses are depicted in boldface.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Mapping ORF18 regions essential for trans-complementation. (A) Schematic representation of FLAG-tagged ( ) ORF18 deletion mutants. The deleted ORF18 region is depicted as a dotted line. The N-terminal (gray boxes) and C-terminal (horizontally striped boxes) nonconserved regions as well as basic (black boxes with white dots) and hydrophobic (diagonally striped boxes) regions are shown. (B) The pFLAG-CMV2-based ORF18 deletion mutant plasmids were tested for their ability to trans-complement ORF18-null virus (18S) in BHK-21 cells. At 5 days posttransfection, the cells were subjected to Western blotting to detect the expression of viral capsid antigen ORF65 using rabbit polyclonal antibody. The ORF18 mutant proteins were detected using monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. A nonspecific band indicated by the star serves as a loading control.
|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Growth kinetics of ORF18-null virus. For both single-step (A) and multiple-step (B) growth curves, noncomplementing BHK-21 cells were infected with wt, 18R, or 18S virus at MOIs of 1 and 0.01, respectively. Infected cells were harvested at the indicated time points postinfection and the viral titer, in 50% tissue culture infectivity doses (TCID50), was determined in a Tet-inducible ORF18 cell line by limiting dilution.
|
ORF18-null virus is defective in late antigen expression. To understand at which step of the viral lytic cycle ORF18 functions, we examined viral lytic antigens expressed by 18S virus in the complementing 293FT-18 and noncomplementing BHK-21 cell lines with or without viral DNA polymerase inhibitor (PAA) treatment. At 24 hpi, an accumulation of a viral capsid antigen, ORF65, was detected (Fig. 6). For ORF65, a true-late gene, expression depends on viral genome replication, hence treatment with PAA resulted in inhibition of ORF65 expression. In untreated cells, ORF65 expression by wt and 18R viruses was not affected in either cell line; however, 18S virus expressed ORF65 in the complementing cell line 293FT-18 (Fig. 6, lane 7) but not in the noncomplementing BHK-21 cells (Fig. 6, lane 14). The observed result was further confirmed by probing with rabbit-polyclonal antibody raised against MHV-68 lytic antigens. These data indicate that ORF18 is essential for the expression of the lytic late antigens that we have assayed.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Viral lytic protein expression. (Upper panel) ORF18-complementing 293FT-18 and noncomplementing BHK-21 cell lines were infected with wt, 18R, or 18S virus at an MOI of 1 with (+) or without () PAA treatment. At 24 hpi, the infected cell lysate was harvested and the expression of viral capsid antigen ORF65 was determined by Western blotting. (Middle panel) MHV-68 lytic antigen was detected by reprobing the blot with rabbit polyclonal antisera. The lower panel depicts a cellular cross-reacting antigen as a control. M, marker; UI, uninfected.
|
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Analysis of gene expression pattern. The BHK-21 cells were infected with wt or 18S virus. The total RNA harvested at 24 hpi was subjected to Northern blot analysis. The blot was probed with ORF57 (A), M3 (B), ORF65 (C), or cellular GAPDH (D). Note that the ORF65 mRNA is completely absent in 18S virus. Arrow heads ( ) indicate major lytic transcripts identified by each probe. The sizes of the DNA ladder are indicated on the left. M, marker.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Analysis of transcript profile. BHK-21 cells were infected with wt or 18S virus (MOI, 5). Total RNA harvested at 12 and 24 hpi was reverse transcribed, and the resulting cDNAs were hybridized to a DNA array spotted with MHV-68 genes. Array values were normalized against cellular GAPDH expression. The transcript profiles of wt and 18S viruses were compared, and the fold reduction of 18S virus gene expression was plotted for each gene on the array for 12 h and 24 h.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Genes downregulated more than 15-fold in ORF18-null virus at 24 hpi
|
1), ORF26 (true-late or
2), and ORF65 (true-late or
2) were cloned upstream of the firefly luciferase coding gene. It was reported that the late promoters of herpesviruses require a functional viral origin of lytic replication (oriLyt) in cis besides viral transfactors for activity (3, 24). Hence, the late promoters were cloned into a vector containing the MHV-68 minimum oriLyt (13). The promoter-reporter constructs were transfected into BHK-21 cells, and 24 h posttransfection the cells were infected with wt virus or 18S virus. PAA treatment was included as a control for assessing the expression kinetic of promoter activity. At 24 hpi, the firefly luciferase activity was measured and the values were normalized against a Renilla luciferase internal transfection control (Fig. 9). Consistent with the array and Northern blotting data, the activities of ORF57 and M3 promoters were induced by 18S virus (Fig. 9A and B); however, the late promoters of ORF26 and ORF65 (Fig. 9C and D) were not activated. All four promoters were active in the context of wt virus infection. Consistent with their expression kinetic classes, PAA treatment enhanced the activity of ORF57 promoter, had no effect on M3 promoter, and completely inhibited the activity of the ORF26 and ORF65 promoters. The promoter-reporter assay indicated that the strength of activation of M3 promoter in ORF18-null and wt virus-infected cells is comparable, whereas the Northern and array analyses (Fig. 7B and 8), examining the accumulation of mRNA which includes processing and transcript stability, showed a relative reduction of M3 transcripts in ORF18-null virus compared to that in wt virus. The wt virus, which is capable of reinfection, can accumulate M3 transcript during subsequent rounds of replication, whereas ORF18-null virus cannot. Despite having similar levels of M3 promoter activity, the combined effect of differences in the replication kinetics and mRNA turnover rate between wt and ORF18-null viruses could account for the variation in M3 transcript level. Taken together, the data strongly support the conclusion that ORF18 is essential to initiate transcription of late genes.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Viral promoter-reporter assay. The viral promoters of (A) ORF57 (early), (B) M3 (early-late), (C) ORF26 (true-late), or (D) ORF65 (true-late) driving a firefly luciferase reporter construct were individually transfected into BHK-21 cells, and at 24 h posttransfection the cells were infected with wt or 18S virus in the presence or absence of PAA. At 24 hpi, cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. Values were normalized against a Renilla luciferase internal control. The normalized firefly luciferase activities of viral infected cells were compared to that of uninfected cells for calculating the fold induction.
|
2 late genes, viral DNA replication in cis is a strict requirement (30, 45). A defect in the production of late lytic antigens by the 18S virus could be accounted for by the possibility that ORF18 may function as an essential cofactor for viral genome replication, and its absence could block viral DNA replication and thus late gene expression. We therefore examined viral DNA replication of 18S virus. Both complementing and noncomplementing cells were infected with wt, 18R, or 18S virus, and PAA treatment of cells was included as a control. The infected cellular DNA was harvested at 12 and 24 hpi, and the viral genome copy number was determined by real-time PCR (Fig. 10). Interestingly, we found that the level of viral DNA replication in 18S virus infection was comparable to that of wt virus infection. Treatment with PAA resulted in a 2- to 3-log reduction in viral DNA copy number in comparison to that of untreated cells (Fig. 10). Taken together, the absence of ORF18 did not have a major deleterious effect on viral genome replication. These data suggest that though viral DNA replication is essential for late gene expression, these two processes are separable in that ORF18 functions as a late-gene expression-regulatory factor downstream of viral DNA replication (Fig. 11).
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Quantitation of viral genome replication. The ORF18-complementing 293FT-18 (A and B) and noncomplementing BHK-21 cell lines (C and D) were infected with wt, 18R, or 18S virus at an MOI of 1 with or without the viral DNA polymerase inhibitor PAA. Total infected cell DNA was harvested at 12 (A and C) and 24 hpi (B and D), and the viral genome copy number per 100 ng of DNA was determined by quantitative PCR.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Schematic model diagram showing the stage at which ORF18 functions during gammaherpesvirus replication. The circularized virus genome in the nucleus (nuc) is shown. The expression cascade of immediate-early (IE), early (E), and late (L) transcripts are indicated with squiggly lines. ORF18 regulates the expression of late genes downstream of viral DNA synthesis. PAA is an inhibitor of virus DNA replication. cyt, cytoplasm.
|
|
|
|---|
Subsequent analysis of mutant virus transcripts showed that the expression of an early gene, ORF57, was not affected, but the late gene ORF65 transcript was absent. This observation was further confirmed by a promoter-reporter assay, where the late promoters ORF26 and ORF65 were inactive in cells infected with ORF18-null virus but not with wild-type MHV-68 virus. This indicates that the defect in ORF18-null virus is at the level of late gene transcription. To address the issue of whether the observed block in late gene transcription is universal to all other transcripts in the late kinetic class, we analyzed the transcript profile of ORF18-null virus using a viral DNA array. Though the mutant virus had a relatively lower rate of mRNA production, transcripts of genes coding for true-late antigens, including envelope, tegument, capsid, and packaging proteins, were drastically reduced. The DNA array analysis also showed that besides late genes, the relative expression of some genes of other kinetic classes was reduced to a certain extent in ORF18-null virus. This can be explained by the following two contributing factors. (i) The ORF18-null virus infection is less cytotoxic, thus, the infected cells will have larger amounts of total RNA and more cells surviving at the time of harvest. This will reduce the radiolabeling of viral transcripts, resulting in less hybridization signal on the viral array. (ii) The other factor is differences observed in the replication kinetics between wt and ORF18-null viruses (Fig. 5). The wt virus is capable of reinfection resulting in accumulation of more transcripts, whereas ORF18-null virus is replication deficient, thus, no further transcript amplification occurs. At 12 hpi, the relative difference in the gene expression profile of wt and ORF18-null viruses is less pronounced, and at 24 hpi the expression of late gene transcripts was reduced severalfold compared to transcripts of other kinetic classes in ORF18-null virus (Fig. 8). Our results revealed that ORF18 is required for transcription initiation of late genes.
For production of late gene transcripts, viral DNA replication in cis is a stringent requirement. To pinpoint the exact stage of the defect in progression of the ORF18-null virus lytic phase, we analyzed DNA synthesis of the mutant virus by quantitating the viral genome copy number. DNA replication of the ORF18-null virus was comparable to that of the wt: treatment with PAA, an inhibitor of viral DNA polymerase, reduced the level of viral DNA synthesis in the ORF18-null virus, indicating that the mutant virus indeed replicated viral DNA. This surprising result sheds light on a previously unknown regulatory step downstream of virus DNA replication that controls the expression of late genes.
Studies on the HSV-1 immediate-early regulatory factor ICP27 (a homologue of gammaherpesvirus ORF57) have reported that temperature-sensitive and null mutants of ICP27 expressed elevated levels of some early genes, reduced levels of other early genes, namely, those involved in viral DNA replication, and exhibited a drastic decrease in the accumulation of late gene products (31, 39, 42). In contrast to the ORF18-null virus, which replicated the viral genome to wild-type levels, the ICP27 mutant viruses are defective in viral genome replication (54). It is possible that the defect in DNA synthesis by the ICP27-null virus contributes to the complete absence of late gene transcription, a finding consistent with our observation that PAA inhibited the activity of late promoters. An HSV-1 ICP22 null mutant virus had been shown to have a defect in the synthesis of an IE transactivator, ICP0, and a subset of late proteins, US11, UL38, and UL41. However, this mutant produced a normal amount of several other late proteins, specifically gC, UL48, and UL34 (38). Hence, the observed effect of ICP22 on late gene expression could be a consequence of a defect in expression of other early regulatory genes downstream of ICP0. Though several HSV-1 mutants have been shown to exhibit defects in late viral gene expression, these phenotypes appear distinct from that of MHV-68 ORF18.
Cellular and viral partners interacting with ORF18 are unknown. If any, the roles of ORF18 interacting proteins in the assembly of transcription machinery onto late promoters following viral DNA synthesis require further investigation. While the mechanism by which ORF18 regulates late gene expression is as yet undefined, these results potentially open up new avenues for investigation into the regulation of late gene expression.
In summary, we characterized the role of a conserved gene, ORF18, in the gammaherpesvirus life cycle. We have described an essential function of ORF18 in the expression of late genes and the protein's dispensability for early gene expression as well as virus DNA replication. This is the first description of a gammaherpesvirus factor controlling the expression of late genes independent of virus DNA replication. Further study is required to elucidate the molecular mechanism governing gammaherpesvirus late gene regulation, potentially presenting new targets for therapeutic intervention in EBV- and KSHV-associated diseases.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants CA091791 and DE015752 and funding from the STOP CANCER Foundation.
|
|
|---|
-herpesvirus 68 using signature-tagged mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:3805-3810.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»