This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCulley, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morrow, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCulley, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morrow, C. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, October 2006, p. 9641-9650, Vol. 80, No. 19
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00709-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Complementation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication by Intracellular Selection of Escherichia coli Formula Supplied in trans

Anna McCulley and Casey D. Morrow*

Department of Cell Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-0024

Received 7 April 2006/ Accepted 12 July 2006


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) exclusively selects tRNA3Lys as the primer for the initiation of reverse transcription, even though both tRNA3Lys and tRNA1,2Lys are found in HIV-1 virions. Alteration of the HIV-1 primer-binding site (PBS) to be complementary to alternate tRNAs results in the use of those tRNAs for replication, indicating that primer complementarity with the PBS is an important determinant of primer selection. In previous studies, we have exploited this fact to develop a system in which yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) tRNAPhe is provided in trans to complement the replication of HIV-1 with a PBS complementary to yeast tRNAPhe. Recent studies have demonstrated that the presence of lysyl-tRNA synthetase in HIV-1 virions might account for the preference for the selection of tRNA3Lys in HIV-1 replication. To establish a complementation system more reflective of HIV-1 primer selection, we have altered the HIV-1 PBS to be complementary to the Escherichia coli tRNA3Lys, which shares near identity with mammalian tRNA3Lys except in the 3'-terminal 18-nucleotide sequence that binds to the PBS. E. coli tRNA3Lys expressed from a plasmid was aminoacylated in mammalian cells. Cotransfection of cells with a plasmid that encodes E. coli tRNA3Lys and a plasmid encoding an HIV-1 provirus with a PBS complementary to E. coli tRNA3Lys resulted in the production of infectious virus. A comparison of the two complementation systems revealed that higher levels of intracellular E. coli tRNA3Lys than of yeast tRNAPhe were needed to achieve equal levels of infectious virus, indicating that there was no preferential selection of E. coli tRNA3Lys. To examine the specificity of tRNALys selection, E. coli tRNA3Lys was modified to tRNA1,2Lys. This tRNA was also aminoacylated when expressed in mammalian cells and complemented the infectivity of HIV-1 at levels similar to those seen for E. coli tRNA3Lys. Additional mutations in the anticodon of E. coli tRNA3Lys were constructed; these mutations did not significantly correlate with the capacity of the tRNA primer to complement infectivity of HIV-1, even though they had a drastic effect on the aminoacylation of the tRNAs. The results of these studies demonstrate that E. coli tRNA3Lys provided in trans can complement HIV-1 genomes with the PBS altered to E. coli tRNA3Lys. However, the capacity of tRNA3Lys to interact with lysyl-tRNA synthetase does not entirely explain the enhanced preference for selection of tRNA3Lys for the replication of HIV-1.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
The conversion of the single-stranded RNA genome of retroviruses into a double-stranded DNA intermediate prior to integration in the host cell chromosome requires a virally encoded enzyme, reverse transcriptase, and a host cell tRNA (31). The initiation of reverse transcription (minus-strand viral DNA synthesis) begins with the extension of a cellular tRNA that is bound to a specific sequence of viral RNA genome known as the primer-binding site (PBS) (31). The PBS is an 18-nucleotide sequence that is located at the 5' end of the viral genome and is complementary to the 3'-terminal 18-nucleotide sequence of the primer tRNA (24, 25, 31). The primer tRNA is selected from the host cell intracellular milieu. Even though different retroviruses select different tRNA primers for reverse transcription, primer selection is conserved within a group of retroviruses (20, 21). Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), like most lentiviruses, selects Formula as the primer for reverse transcription (20, 21).

Previous studies from this laboratory and others have shown that substitution of the PBS to be complementary to alternative tRNAs results in a virus that can transiently utilize this tRNA for replication (4, 17, 34). Since it is difficult to manipulate endogenous levels of tRNA, we have developed a complementation system that required tRNA to be provided in trans for HIV-1 infectivity (13, 14, 37, 38). As described in previous reports, the alteration of the HIV-1 PBS to be complementary to yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) tRNAPhe resulted in a virus that was noninfectious in mammalian cells unless yeast tRNAPhe was provided in trans. Expression of yeast tRNAPhe from a cDNA resulted in a tRNA that had undergone aminoacylation, nuclear transport, and inclusion into the cycle of host cell protein synthesis (15). The ability of the tRNA to be transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm was critical for the selection of the tRNA as a primer (13).

While the system utilizing yeast tRNAPhe has revealed some of the basic elements of the tRNA molecule required for primer selection, recent studies have suggested that HIV-1 has evolved several different mechanisms by which Formula can be preferentially selected for encapsidation (3, 9, 10, 16, 19). Early studies demonstrated that Gag-Pol was needed for the enrichment of HIV-1 virions with Formula, since pseudovirions which did not contain Gag-Pol incorporated a variety of tRNAs but showed no preference for Formula (16, 19). Recently, lysyl-tRNA synthetase has been found within the HIV-1 virion (3, 9). The finding of lysyl-tRNA synthetase in the virion led to the postulation that a selective incorporation of Formula in the virions is facilitated through interaction with lysyl-tRNA synthetase. However, the chaperoning of Formula into HIV-1 virions by lysyl-tRNA synthetase does not explain why Formula, as opposed to Formula, is preferentially selected for HIV-1 replication, since both tRNAs are present at relatively equal amounts in the HIV-1 virion (11). Previous studies from this laboratory and others have revealed that HIV-1 with a PBS altered to Formula had severely reduced capacity for replication and reverted back to utilizing Formula following limited in vitro culture (1, 12). In order for Formula to be stably utilized during replication, these viruses require supplementary mutations within the U5 with the altered PBS (1, 12). Even with the alterations to allow use of Formula, the virus does not replicate with kinetics the same as those of the wild type. Collectively, the results of these studies suggest that Formula might have unique properties that would facilitate the preferential selection and use of this tRNA as a primer for HIV-1 replication.

To further understand the preferential selection mechanism of Formula, it would be advantageous to have a complementation system that requires the selection of exogenously added Formula. Since the levels of endogenous Formula are difficult to manipulate in mammalian cells, we have approached this problem by developing a complementation system which requires the addition of Escherichia coli Formula in trans to complement the HIV-1 provirus with the PBS of E. coli Formula. Modifications to Formula have been shown to be important for HIV-1 replication (6, 7). E. coli Formula has many base modifications that are either identical or similar to the corresponding mammalian Formula base modifications, as well as a high level of sequence identity to mammalian Formula (28). In the current study, we have found that the HIV-1 provirus with the E. coli Formula PBS requires cotransfection of the plasmid encoding the E. coli Formula to generate infectious virus. We have demonstrated that E. coli Formula undergoes aminoacylation. Greater amounts of E. coli Formula than of yeast tRNAPhe were required to achieve similar levels of complementation, indicating that no selective preference exists for E. coli Formula, even though the tRNA can interact with lysyl-tRNA synthetase. Furthermore, alteration of the E. coli Formula anticodon to Formula resulted in complementation levels similar to those found with E. coli Formula, suggesting that additional features of primer selection, other than tRNA interaction with lysyl-tRNA synthetase, are probably important for the preferential use of Formula as a primer.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Tissue culture. 293HEK and JC53ßL cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic (Gibco/BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). All cell cultures were maintained in a 37°C incubator supplemented with 5% CO2.

Proviral plasmids. The plasmid HXB2gpt, which encodes the HIV-1 provirus, was used for the substitution of the PBS in order to create proviral HIV-1 mutants containing a PBS complementary to the first 3'-terminal 18 nucleotides of either yeast tRNAPhe or E. coli tRNALys (15, 26, 37). A previously constructed pUC119 PBS shuttle vector that contains an HIV-1 DNA fragment of the 5' long terminal repeat (LTR), PBS, and the gag leader region was used as a template for PBS mutagenesis (39). Mutagenesis of the PBS in the pUC119 PBS shuttle vector to yeast tRNAPhe PBS was performed using the GeneEditor in vitro site-directed mutagenesis system (Promega, Madison, WI) with the following mutagenic primer: 5'TCTCTAGCAGTGGTGCGAATTCTGTGGATGGAAAGCGAAAGGGAAACCAGAGGAGC3'. Mutagenesis of the PBS in the pUC119 PBS shuttle vector to PBS complementary to E. coli tRNALys was performed using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with the following primers: 5'CTCTAGCAGTGGTGGGTCGTGCAGGACTTGAAAGCGAAAGGGAAACCAGA3' (forward) and 5'TCTGGTTTCCCTTTCGCTTTCAAGTCCTGCACGACCCACCACTGCTAGAG3' (reverse). The manufacturer's instructions were followed for all mutagenic reactions. The pUC119 PBS shuttle vector with the substituted PBS was digested with BssHII and HpaI enzymes in order to release an 868-bp fragment. The fragment was ligated back into pHXB2gpt, which was digested with BssHII and HpaI restriction enzymes. Resulting HIV-1 proviral mutants were labeled pHXB2(yPBSPhe) and pHXB2(EcPBSLys). All mutations were screened by restriction digests. Final mutants were verified by DNA sequencing.

tRNA plasmids. The yeast tRNAPhe gene was constructed previously (14, 15). The E. coli tRNALys gene was constructed using PCR extension with the following primers: 5'GCAGGGCTCGAGGTCCGGGTCGTTAGCTCAGTTGGTAGAGCAGTTGACTTTTAATC AATTGGTCGCAGG3' (forward) and 5'GCGGACGAAGCTTCCAAAAAATGGGTCGTGCAGGACTTGAACCTGCGACCAATTGATTAAAAGTCAA3' (reverse). The PCR product was TA cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI), and the resultant plasmid was digested with XhoI and HindIII in order to release the E. coli tRNALys gene (approximately 100 bp). The E. coli tRNALys gene was then ligated into an LS9 plasmid, downstream of the human U6snRNA promoter, by use of the XhoI and HindIII restriction sites (14, 15, 18). The end product was a plasmid labeled pU6EcLys. The anticodon bases of E. coli tRNALys were substituted to CUU (corresponding to the anticodon of Formula), CUA, UUA, and UCA by use of QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), pU6EcLys as the template, and the following primers: 5'GGTAGAGCAGTTGACTCTTAATCAATTGGTCGCAGGTT3' (CUU forward) and 5'AACCTGCGACCAATTGATTAAGAGTCAACTGCTCTACC3' (CUU reverse); 5'GGTAGAGCAGTTGACTCTAAATCAATTGGTCGCAGGTT3' (CUA forward) and 5'AACCTGCGACCAATTGATTTAGAGTCAACTGCTCTACC3' (CUA reverse); 5'GGTAGAGCAGTTGACTTTAAATCAATTGGTCGCAGGTT3' (UUA forward) and 5'AACCTGCGACCAATTGATTTAAAGTCAACTGCTCTACC3' (UUA reverse); and 5'GGTAGAGCAGTTGACTTCAAATCAATTGGTCGCAGGTT3' (UCA forward) and 5'AACCTGCGACCAATTGATTTGAAGTCAACTGCTCTACC3' (UCA reverse). The resultant plasmids were labeled pU6EcLys1,2, pU6EcCUA, pU6EcUUA, and pU6EcUCA. All plasmids were screened with restriction digest reactions and verified by DNA sequencing.

Transfections. Complementation of HIV-1 proviral mutants was accomplished by cotransfection of tRNA-carrying plasmids with HIV-1 proviral mutants into 293HEK cells. Complementation of HIV-1 proviral genomes was described previously (13, 14, 37, 38). Cotransfection was achieved by using a calcium phosphate-based mammalian transfection kit (Stratagene, San Diego, CA) with the instructions scaled down for six-well plates. Briefly, 293HEK cells were seeded at a concentration of 2 x 105 cells per well. The cells were cotransfected with 500 ng of proviral plasmid and 50 ng, 100 ng, 500 ng, and 1,000 ng of tRNA-carrying plasmid 24 h later. At approximately 7 h posttransfection, the cells were washed once with 1x phosphate-buffered saline and supplied with fresh media. Supernatants were collected approximately 48 h posttransfection, centrifuged at 3,000 x g, and used in a JC53ßL assay to determine luciferase activity, which has been determined to correlate to the units of the infectious virus that is being tested.

Viral infection. Supernatants collected from cotransfections were used in a JC53ßL reporter assay in order to determine infectious viral units (36). JC53ßL cells were seeded 24 h preinfection. Supernatants were diluted 1:3 in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS and subsequently with two sequential 1:5 dilutions. The cells were incubated with the virus for 2 h in a 37°C incubator supplemented with 5% CO2. After 2 h, DMEM with 10% FBS was added to each well, and the cells were incubated for an additional 48 h. To determine luciferase activity, cells were lysed using M-PER mammalian protein extraction reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and approximately 20 µl of each lysed sample was transferred to a microplate. Reporter lysis buffer (Promega, Madison, WI) was added to each sample in the microplate, and the light intensity was measured using a LUMIstar luminometer (BMG Labtech, Durham, NC). Uninfected cells in wells represented the background luciferase activity, which was subtracted from all other samples. Luciferase activity for pHXB2(yPBSPhe) and pHXB2(EcPBSLys), without complementing tRNA, was set as the background activity and was subtracted from complementation samples. The luciferase values for two dilutions per sample were averaged. Relative light units (rLU) per ml were calculated by dividing the luciferase values by their corresponding dilution values.

RNA isolation and tRNA analysis. 293HEK cells were transfected with pU6EcLys, pU6EcLys1,2, pU6EcCUA, pU6EcUUA, or pU6EcUCA with the use of the mammalian transfection kit (Stratagene, San Diego, CA). The first set of transfected cells was used for the collection of total RNA, while the second set was used for the collection of aminoacyl tRNAs at 48 h posttransfection. The collection and isolation of total RNA and aminoacylated tRNAs was performed as previously described (13-15). Total RNA and aminoacyl tRNA were also isolated from mock-transfected 293HEK cells. Previously constructed oligonucleotide probes that are complementary to yeast tRNAPhe and mammalian Formula were used for Northern analysis (14). E. coli tRNALys was detected using a [{gamma}-32P]ATP-kinased oligo labeled with the use of Ready-to-go T4 polynucleotide kinase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) with the following probe: 5'-GGTCGTGCAGGATTCGAACCTGCGACCAATTGATTAAAAGTCAACTGCTCTACCAACTGAGCTAACGAC3'. Analyses of total RNA and aminoacyl tRNA were performed using acidic polyacrylamide gels and Northern blotting (13-15). The membranes were exposed to X-ray film, which was developed using an SRX-101A developer (Konica, Wayne, NJ). Areas of the membrane corresponding to the bands on the X-ray film were excised and counted for radioactivity with an LS 5000TA scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).

In vitro transcription. In vitro transcripts were designed, and reactions were carried out as indicated in a MEGAshortscript T7 kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). In vitro transcripts for yeast tRNAPhe were prepared using the MEGAshortscript T7 kit with previously obtained oligonucleotides (14). The following oligonucleotides were used with a plasmid template pU6EcLys in order to produce E. coli Formula in vitro transcripts: 5'CTGCAGTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTCGTTAGCTCAGTTGGT3' (T7EcLys forward) and 5' TGGTGGGTCGTGCAGGACTTGAACCT3' (T7EcLys reverse). The transcripts were diluted to yield final concentrations of 5 ng, 10 ng, 20 ng, 40 ng, and 80 ng, which were used as standards in the Northern blots.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Construction of HIV-1 proviral genome with PBS complementary to E. coli tRNA3Lys. Formula contains several modified nucleotides as a result of posttranscriptional processing. Previous studies have shown that nucleotides within the anticodon loop impart a unique structure to this tRNA which could account for its preferential selection by HIV-1 as the primer (2, 32). The E. coli Formula has near identity with mammalian Formula in the anticodon, T{Psi}C, and D-loop regions (Fig. 1A). Differences between these two tRNAs exist mainly in the acceptor stem region (3'-terminal 18 nucleotides), which interacts with the PBS of HIV-1. To express E. coli Formula, we have utilized a plasmid similar to that previously reported for the expression of yeast tRNAPhe (14, 15). This plasmid contains a U6 snRNA polymerase III promoter and nucleotides at the 3' terminus necessary for polymerase III termination. The tRNA gene was cloned in to the transcription cassette between the promoter and the termination signal. The PBS of the HIV-1 proviral genome (HXB2) was modified to be complementary to the 3'-terminal 18 nucleotides of E. coli Formula. The nucleotides of the wild-type HIV-1 PBS and the altered HIV-1 E. coli PBS have a degree of sequence variation sufficient to preclude the native tRNA primer from binding to the altered HIV-1 PBS (Fig. 1B).


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Mammalian Formula, Escherichia coli Formula, and HIV-1 proviral PBS sequences. (A) Cloverleaf depictions of mammalian Formula and E. coli Formula. The boldface nucleotides in the mammalian Formula represent the 3'-terminal 18 nucleotides that are complementary to the HIV-1 PBS; the anticodon of the tRNA is boxed. The boldface nucleotides in the E. coli Formula represent base differences from mammalian Formula. Posttranscriptionally modified bases are shown for both tRNAs. (B) Schematic representation of the U5 region with proviral sequences from wild-type HXB2 and mutant HXB2(EcPBSLys). The underlined sequences correspond to the A-rich regions and the PBS, which are complementary to mammalian Formula for the wild-type HXB2 and E. coli Formula for the mutant HXB2(EcPBSLys).

Complementation of HIV-1 genomes by tRNA supplied in trans. Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that a mutation within the first 9 nucleotides of the PBS can have a drastic impact on the infectivity of wild-type HIV (33). Thus, the nucleotide variation that exists between the wild type HIV-1 PBS and the altered HIV-1 PBS, as well as between the 3'-terminal 18 nucleotides of E. coli Formula and mammalian Formula, should preclude the use of the mammalian Formula by the altered HIV-1. To determine whether the E. coli Formula would complement the replication of the altered HIV-1 proviral genome (PBS to E. coli Formula), cotransfection experiments were done with the proviral plasmid (pHXB2EcPBSLys) containing the altered PBS and with different amounts of the plasmid (pU6EcLys) encoding E. coli Formula. For comparison, we utilized the HIV-1 provirus in which the PBS was altered to be complementary to yeast tRNAPhe and plasmid (pU6Phe) encoding the cDNA of yeast tRNAPhe. For these studies, the production of infectious virus was measured by using a JC53ßL assay, in which a HeLa indicator cell line was infected with viruses recovered from cotransfections. The indicator cell line contains a luciferase gene under the control of the HIV-1 LTR. The expression of luciferase is dependent upon infection, reverse transcription, and expression of Tat (5, 36). Consistent with our previously reported results with yeast tRNAPhe, we found that no infectious virus was produced unless the plasmid encoding yeast tRNAPhe was provided in the cotransfection and that increasing the amounts of plasmid encoding yeast tRNAPhe resulted in an increase in infectious virus, as determined by the luciferase activity induced in JC53ßL cells, to a level of approximately 106 over background (proviral plasmid transfected without tRNAPhe) (Fig. 2A and B) (14, 15). We next tested the complementation system, which requires cotransfection of HIV-1 proviral plasmid containing a PBS to E. coli Formula in conjunction with the plasmid encoding E. coli Formula. We obtained a low basal level of luciferase activity (approximately 1,000 light units) after transfection of the proviral plasmid alone, in the absence of the plasmid encoding E. coli Formula. Cotransfection of the E. coli Formula plasmid in conjunction with the altered HIV-1 proviral plasmid (PBS to E. coli Formula) resulted in a level of production of infectious virus that was approximately fivefold lower than that of wild-type HIV-1 (Fig. 2A and B). Increasing the amounts of the E. coli Formula plasmid in cotransfections resulted in an increase of infectious virus that reached a plateau at a level approximately 2 x 105 greater than that of the background control (no E. coli Formula) (Fig. 2B). Surprisingly, the overall levels of the infectious virus generated in the E. coli Formula complementation system under these conditions were approximately fivefold less than those for the same system with yeast tRNAPhe (Fig. 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Complementation of HXB2(EcPBSLys) with the plasmid that encodes E. coli Formula and of HXB2(yPBSPhe) with the plasmid that encodes yeast tRNAPhe. (A) Representation of luciferase activity obtained from JC53ßL cells after infection with viruses that were collected from cotransfections of 293HEK cells with 500 ng of HIV-1 proviral plasmids in the presence or the absence of 500 ng of plasmid encoding the specified tRNA, relative to that for wild-type HIV-1 transfected at 500 ng. Dilutions of collected supernatants that were acquired from cotransfections were used to infect the JC53ßL cell line which contains a luciferase gene under the transcriptional control of the HIV-1 LTR (5, 36). (B) Luciferase activity obtained from JC53ßL cells after infection with viruses that were collected from cotransfections of 293HEK cells with 500 ng of proviral plasmids and tRNA plasmids that were titrated in at the indicated quantities. Luciferase activity, in rLU/ml, for the complementation of plasmid HXB2(yPBSPhe) with pU6Phe is represented by closed triangles, and that of plasmid HXB2(EcPBSLys) with pU6EcLys is represented by open squares. Wild-type HXB2 (500 ng and no tRNA) is represented by a closed square. Background luciferase activity obtained from mock-transfected cultures was subtracted from each sample. Background luciferase activity obtained from HXB2(yPBSPhe) alone was subtracted from all complementation samples of HXB2(yPBSPhe) with yeast tRNAPhe, while background luciferase activity obtained from HXB2(EcPBSLys) alone was subtracted from all complementation samples of HXB2(EcPBSLys) with E. coli Formula. The data denote means ± standard deviations derived from three independent experiments.

We next wanted to investigate the reason for the lower complementation in the E. coli Formula system. In previous studies, we have shown that the aminoacylation of yeast tRNAPhe was an important element in facilitating the selection of this tRNA as a primer for HIV-1 replication (14, 15). One explanation for the lower complementation activity of E. coli Formula could be that it does not undergo aminoacylation in mammalian cells. However, Schimmel's group previously reported that E. coli Formula is aminoacylated by mammalian lysyl-tRNA synthetase (27). To confirm this result, we analyzed the aminoacylation status of E. coli Formula in mammalian cells. Following the transfection of the pU6EcLys plasmid encoding the cDNA for E. coli Formula, we found that majority of the E. coli Formula was aminoacylated (Fig. 3A); the minor levels of deacylated E. coli Formula noted in this experiment were also found by analysis of yeast tRNAPhe in cells transfected with the pU6Phe plasmid encoding the cDNA for yeast tRNAPhe and were possibly due to the hydrolysis of the amino acid-tRNA bond during the processing of the RNA sample. Next, we compared the total amounts of yeast tRNAPhe and E. coli Formula generated in cells following transfection of their respective cDNAs. In this case, we titrated in various amounts of each plasmid DNA encoding the tRNAs and determined the quantity of tRNA molecules compared to known standards generated through in vitro transcription. Surprisingly, we found that the levels of E. coli Formula were approximately 20 times less than those for yeast tRNAPhe (Fig. 3B). The reason for this difference in tRNA amounts following transfection of plasmids with essentially the same promoter elements for the tRNAs was not clear, although this phenomenon could be due to differential regulation of tRNA pools in the cell for tRNALys versus tRNAPhe. To follow up this result, we then adjusted the levels of the plasmids encoding E. coli Formula and yeast tRNAPhe to give equal levels of production of infectious virus (Fig. 3C). Under these conditions, we found that from the four amounts of tRNA plasmids transfected, an average of four times more intracellular E. coli Formula than yeast tRNAPhe was needed for the production of equal amounts of virus. Thus, we conclude that E. coli Formula can function as a primer for HIV-1 but exhibits no enhanced selection/complementation compared to that for yeast tRNAPhe or that for mammalian tRNALys.


Figure 3
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Expression of E. coli Formula in mammalian cells. (A) Analysis of aminoacylation for E. coli Formula and E. coli Formula. The migration of the aminoacylated (AA) and deacylated (DA) samples is shown. Cytoplasmic tRNAs were collected from 293HEK cells that were transfected with pU6Phe, pU6EcLys, and pU6EcLys1,2. All cytoplasmic RNA was isolated under acidic conditions, and 3.7 µg of the RNA was loaded per well. Lanes 1, 2, 9, and 10 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from mock transfection; lanes 3, 4, 11, and 12 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from pU6EcLys transfection; lanes 5, 6, 13, and 14 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from pU6EcLys1,2 transfection; and lanes 7, 8, 15, and 16 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from pU6Phe transfection. Lanes 1 to 8 were probed for E. coli Formula, while lanes 9 to 16 were probed for mammalian Formula. Deacylated controls were prepared by adjustment of pH to basic conditions and incubation for 1 h at 42°C. Deacylated samples are shown in lanes 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15. The exposure times for the blots varied. (B) Relative ratio of E. coli Formula molecules to yeast tRNAPhe. 293HEK cells were transfected with 500 ng of pU6EcLys and pU6Phe. Total RNA was collected, and 15 µg was loaded per lane (Northern blot). In vitro-transcribed standards of E. coli tRNALys and yeast tRNAPhe were loaded at 5 ng, 10 ng, 20 ng, 40 ng, and 80 ng per lane, respectively. The blots were probed for E. coli tRNALys and yeast tRNAPhe and exposed to X-ray film. Areas of the membrane corresponding to the bands on film were excised and counted for radioactivity with a scintillation counter. Known amounts of in vitro-transcribed tRNA were used to generate a standard curve (R2 = 0.99). Using this curve, we found that the amount of tRNA molecules per sample for E. coli Formula was 0.42 ng per 15 µg total RNA and that for yeast tRNAPhe was 8.91 ng per 15 µg total RNA. (C) Luciferase activity obtained from JC53ßL cells after infection with viruses that were collected from cotransfections of 293HEK cells with 500 ng of proviral plasmids and tRNA plasmids that were titrated in at the indicated quantities. Note that yeast tRNAPhe had 20 times less plasmid DNA than E. coli Formula to normalize amounts of intracellular E. coli Formula and yeast tRNAPhe. Subsequent analysis of intracellular levels of each tRNA expressed at each concentration revealed four times more E. coli Formula than yeast tRNAPhe. Carrier DNA (pUC19) was included with yeast tRNAPhe plasmid to account for lower DNA concentrations during calcium phosphate cotransfections. Luciferase activity, in rLU/ml, for complementation of plasmid HXB2(yPBSPhe) with pU6Phe is represented by closed triangles, and that of plasmid HXB2(EcPBSLys) with pU6EcLys is represented by open squares. Background luciferase activity obtained from mock-transfected cultures was subtracted from each sample. Background luciferase activity obtained from HXB2(yPBSPhe) alone was subtracted from all complementation samples of HXB2(yPBSPhe) with yeast tRNAPhe, while background luciferase activity obtained from HXB2(EcPBSLys) alone was subtracted from all complementation samples of HXB2(EcPBSLys) with E. coli Formula. The data denote means ± standard deviations derived from three independent experiments.

Complementation of HIV-1 with E. coli tRNA1,2Lys provided in trans. We next wanted to resolve the question of whether HIV-1 with a PBS complementary to E. coli Formula would show a preferential selection for E. coli Formula versus E. coli Formula. Earlier studies have shown that although both Formula and Formula are found in HIV-1 virions, HIV-1 has a clear preference for Formula, since the alteration of the PBS to be complementary to Formula did not result in a virus that could utilize Formula (1, 12). Mutations within U5, or the primer activation site, are required for this virus to maintain a PBS complementary to Formula following in vitro culturing; however, these viruses grow more slowly than the wild type (1, 12, 23). As a result, HIV-1 has evolved a clear preference for the selection of Formula over Formula. To determine if this is also the case for the HIV-1 provirus designed to use E. coli Formula, we modified the anticodon region of E. coli Formula so that it corresponded to that for Formula. The anticodon for Formula is CUU, whereas the anticodon for Formula is UUU (Fig. 4). We first determined if this anticodon base mutation would affect the capacity of this E. coli Formula to be aminoacylated, given that the anticodon of tRNALys is also an important identity element for synthetase recognition. We analyzed the aminoacylation status of E. coli Formula generated from transfection. No clear differences were observed between the level of aminoacylation of E. coli Formula and that for E. coli Formula, indicating that both tRNAs are competent to interact with mammalian lysyl-tRNA synthetase (Fig. 3A). Next, we tested the ability of the E. coli Formula to complement the replication of HIV-1 with the PBS complementary to E. coli Formula. Titration of increasing amounts of plasmid pU6EcLys1,2 and pU6EcLys encoding E. coli Formula and E. coli Formula resulted in the complementation of HIV-1. Thus, the substitution of the E. coli Formula anticodon to that for Formula did not have an impact on the capacity of this tRNA to complement the replication. In fact, analysis of the complementation levels for all concentrations of plasmid analyzed revealed that the amount of infectious virus recovered was somewhat greater with the plasmid encoding E. coli Formula than with the plasmid encoding E. coli Formula (Fig. 5A). Finally, we compared the total amounts of E. coli Formula and E. coli Formula found in transfected cells. Using identical amounts of plasmid, we found that intracellular E. coli Formula levels were approximately two times lower than those for E. coli Formula (Fig. 5B). If higher amounts of E. coli Formula in the cell are taken into account, then E. coli Formula and E. coli Formula complement the altered HIV-1 genome at similar levels, indicating that there is no preference by the HIV-1 provirus for Formula.


Figure 4
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Cloverleaf diagrams of lysine tRNA molecules. The anticodon of E. coli Formula was substituted from UUU to CUU in order to represent Formula. The U34C base change is indicated by an arrow. Mammalian Formula is shown for comparison. Boldface nucleotides correspond to the 3'-terminal 18 nucleotides that interact with the PBS.


Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Complementation of HXB2(EcPBSLys) with plasmids that encode E. coli Formula and E. coli Formula. (A) 293HEK cells were cotransfected with 500 ng of proviral plasmids and with tRNA plasmids that were titrated in at the indicated quantities. Dilutions of collected supernatants that were acquired from cotransfections were used to infect the JC53ßL cell line which contains a luciferase gene under the transcriptional control of the HIV-1 LTR (5, 36). Luciferase activity, in rLU/ml, for complementation of plasmid HXB2(EcPBSLys) with pU6EcLys1,2 is represented by closed squares, and that of plasmid HXB2(EcPBSLys) with pU6EcLys is represented by closed diamonds. Background luciferase activity obtained from mock-transfected cultures was subtracted from each sample. Background luciferase activity obtained from HXB2(EcPBSLys) alone was subtracted from all complementation samples of HXB2(EcPBSLys) with E. coli tRNALys. The data denote means ± standard deviations derived from three independent experiments. (B) Relative ratio of E. coli Formula to E. coli Formula. 293HEK cells were transfected with 500 ng of pU6EcLys and pU6EcLys1,2. Total RNA was collected, and 15 µg was loaded per lane (Northern blot). In vitro-transcribed standards of E. coli tRNALys were loaded at 5 ng, 10 ng, 20 ng, 40 ng, and 80 ng per lane, respectively. The blots were probed for E. coli tRNALys and exposed to X-ray film. Areas of the membrane corresponding to the bands on film were excised and counted for radioactivity with a scintillation counter. Known amounts of in vitro-transcribed tRNA were used to generate a standard curve (R2 = 0.99). Using this curve, we found that the amount of tRNA molecules per sample of E. coli Formula was 0.42 ng per 15 µg total RNA and that for E. coli Formula was 1.00 ng per 15 µg total RNA.

Complementation of HIV-1 with E. coli tRNALys mutants provided in trans. Alteration of nucleotide U35 in Formula to A or G leads to a severe loss of aminoacylation due to poor recognition of the tRNA by the lysyl-tRNA synthetase, while alterations of U34 and U36 have a less severe effect on aminoacylation (22, 29, 30). Because our earlier studies had found that aminoacylation of the tRNA is important for primer selection, we decided to determine whether or not this was also the case for E. coli Formula. To address this point, we generated mutations within the anticodon region of E. coli Formula that altered the anticodon from UUU to CUA, to UUA, and to UCA (Fig. 6A). We then compared the levels of complementation of these mutant tRNAs with those for wild-type E. coli Formula. Analysis of the complementation for each of the mutant tRNALys revealed that the level of infectious virus for the mutant with the anticodon CUA was approximately equal to that of the wild-type E. coli Formula (Fig. 6B). Mutation of the anticodon UUU to UCA or UUA somewhat compromised the capacities of these mutant tRNAs to complement HIV-1 replication to the level found with E. coli Formula (Fig. 6B). We next determined whether the levels of complementation were consistent with the levels of aminoacylation of the mutant tRNAs. We found that tRNA mutants with CUA and UUA anticodon alteration were aminoacylated, albeit at low levels, while the mutant with UCA showed no detectable aminoacylation (Fig. 6C). Interestingly, the mutant with the CUA anticodon had complementation, but not aminoacylation, comparable to that of E. coli Formula. All three altered tRNAs demonstrated considerably less aminoacylation than the E. coli Formula. The observed results suggest that primer selection is not entirely dependent on tRNA aminoacylation.


Figure 6
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Complementation of HIV-1 infectivity with E. coli Formula mutants. (A) Cloverleaf structures of mutant tRNALys. The anticodon of E. coli Formula was mutated from UUU to CUA, to UUA, and to UCA. Boldface nucleotides indicate the anticodon of each tRNA. Base changes are indicated by arrowheads. (B) Complementation of HXB2(EcPBSLys) infectivity with plasmids that encode E. coli tRNALys anticodon mutants. 293HEK cells were cotransfected with 500 ng of proviral plasmids and tRNA plasmids that were titrated in at the indicated quantities. Dilutions of supernatants that were collected from cotransfections were used to infect the JC53ßL cell line (5, 36). Luciferase activity, in rLU/ml, for complementation of plasmid HXB2(EcPBSLys) with pU6EcLys is represented by closed diamonds, that with pU6EcLysCUA is represented by closed squares, that with pU6EcLysUCA is represented by closed triangles, and that with pU6EcLysUUA is represented by x. Background luciferase activity obtained from mock-transfected cultures was subtracted from each sample. Background luciferase activity obtained from HXB2(EcPBSLys) alone was subtracted from all complementation samples of HXB2(EcPBSLys) with E. coli tRNALys anticodon mutants. The data denote means ± standard deviations derived from three independent experiments. Note that the standard deviation at 1 µg for pU6EcLysUUA is slightly shifted for clarity in viewing. (C) Aminoacylation for E. coli tRNALys anticodon mutants. The migration of the aminoacylated (AA) and deacylated (DA) samples is shown. Cytoplasmic tRNAs were collected from 293HEK cells that were transfected with pU6EcLys, pU6EcLysCUA, pU6EcLysUUA, and pU6EcLysUCA. All cytoplasmic RNA was isolated under acidic conditions. Lanes 1 and 2 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from pU6EcLysUCA transfection; lanes 3 and 4 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from pU6EcLysUUA transfection; lanes 5 and 6 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from pU6EcLysCUA transfection; lanes 7 to 10 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from pU6EcLys transfection; and lanes 11 and 12 were loaded with cytoplasmic RNA from mock transfection. All samples were probed for E. coli tRNALys. Deacylated controls were prepared by adjustment of samples to basic conditions and incubation for 1 h at 42°C. Deacylated samples are shown in lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
In the current study, we have further investigated the mechanism for the preferential selection of Formula as the primer for HIV-1 reverse transcription. A complementation system which utilizes E. coli Formula as the primer for HIV-1 reverse transcription was developed. The PBS of the HIV-1 proviral genome was modified to be complementary to the 3'-terminal 18 nucleotides of E. coli Formula. The production of infectious virus was dependent upon the expression of E. coli Formula. However, no preference was found for Formula, yeast tRNAPhe, or Formula with respect to complementation levels. Finally, the lack of aminoacylation for Formula anticodon mutants did not correlate to the complementation levels produced by cotransfection of those mutant tRNA plasmids with the HIV-1 proviral plasmid containing the PBS complementary to E. coli Formula, indicating that interaction with the lysyl-tRNA synthetase does not entirely explain HIV-1 primer preference.

Previous studies from this laboratory and others have addressed the issues of primer preference by using HIV-1 proviruses in which the PBS was altered to be complementary to tRNAs other than Formula (4, 17, 34). In each case, it was found that the resulting virus was unstable and reverted back to utilize Formula as the primer, highlighting the fact that HIV-1 prefers to select Formula as the primer for replication. Previous studies have suggested that viral (HIV-1 Gag-Pol) and cellular (lysyl-tRNA synthetase) proteins are important for the preferential selection and use of Formula (3, 9, 10). Since it is difficult to manipulate the endogenous levels of Formula, our earlier studies used a complementation system by supplying yeast tRNAPhe in trans (14, 15, 37, 38). A limitation of this yeast tRNAPhe complementation system, though, was the inability to access the viral proteins or lysyl-tRNA synthetase which might be needed for preferential selection of Formula. The use of E. coli Formula circumvents some of these issues because, as shown in our studies, E. coli Formula is aminoacylated following expression in mammalian cells, indicating the interaction with the mammalian synthetase. Since the anticodon loop of E. coli Formula contains transcriptional modifications analogous to mammalian Formula modifications and the tRNAs are alike in sequence, we expected that complementation using this system would be enhanced compared to the yeast tRNAPhe complementation (2, 28, 32). However, we found that the absolute complementation levels observed for E. coli Formula were lower than those for yeast tRNAPhe. The absolute differences in complementation levels were most likely due to the smaller amounts of E. coli Formula expressed in the transfected cells, even though both tRNAs were expressed from identical plasmids. To achieve similar levels of complementation, we still needed approximately four times more intracellular Formula than tRNAPhe. Thus, there was no preferential selection of E. coli Formula, even though this tRNA could interact with lysyl-tRNA synthetase.

One of the unique features of the HIV-1 primer selection is the preference for Formula over Formula. This is not due to the inability of Formula to be incorporated into HIV-1 virions, since previous studies have shown that Formula is generally present at levels equal to and sometimes greater than those for Formula (11). If incorporation into the virion was the sole determinant for primer selection, then one would suspect that an HIV-1 provirus which might utilize Formula rather than Formula as the primer for reverse transcription could be generated. Previous studies have shown that alteration of the proviral PBS to be complementary to Formula does not result in a virus that stably utilizes Formula as a primer for reverse transcription (1, 12, 23). It is only through additional mutations in the U5 region (A-loop or primer activation signal) that the virus can stably utilize Formula. However, even under these conditions, the virus has a replication capacity that is reduced compared to that of the wild-type virus. To further explore this selectivity for Formula, we substituted the E. coli Formula anticodon to correspond to that for Formula and then analyzed the capacity of this tRNA to complement the HIV-1 proviral genome in which the PBS was complementary to E. coli Formula. While the E. coli Formula did complement this genome, we were surprised to find that the levels of complementation following normalization for intracellular tRNA levels were similar to those for Formula, indicating that there was no preferential selection and use of E. coli Formula over E. coli Formula. The facts that both E. coli Formula and E. coli Formula interact with the lysyl-tRNA synthetase (as confirmed by the analysis of the aminoacylation status of these tRNAs following transfection) and that the virus shows no preference for the E. coli Formula over E. coli Formula imply that the preference for mammalian Formula over Formula may be more complex than the capacity to interact with lysyl-tRNA synthetase.

A further insight into the complexity of primer selection came from our analysis of additional E. coli Formula mutants containing substitutions of the anticodon nucleotides. The anticodon of the tRNALys is a critical identity element for synthetase recognition. The substitution of nucleotide U35 in Formula to an A or a G leads to the loss of binding and aminoacylation by the lysyl-tRNA synthetase (22, 29, 30). Upon testing our mutants in the complementation system, we found that certain mutants had complementation levels close to that for E. coli Formula. The mutant with an anticodon CUA had complementation levels comparable to those for wild-type E. coli Formula, while tRNAs with anticodon UCA or UUA had slightly lower levels of complementation, suggesting that the selective preference for Formula does not fully reside in the unique features of the tRNA molecule. That is, structural features of Formula, such as greater flexibility in the anticodon region, are probably not entirely responsible for the preferential use of Formula as the primer for HIV-1 reverse transcription, although it is possible that structural features of Formula are more important in the processivity of the reverse transcriptase (2, 6, 21). A previous study suggests that the Formula anticodon is a key determinant for the incorporation of the primer by HIV-1 and that packaging correlates with aminoacylation (8). However, our Formula UCA mutant, which is not aminoacylated by the synthetase due to the U35C mutation, complements infectivity of the mutant HIV-1 provirus. These results highlight the possibility that primer selection and packaging may be two independent mechanisms. This idea is also supported by our previous studies using a virus that is engineered to use tRNAHis. Analysis of the tRNA content of this virus revealed that it contained amounts/ratios of Formula similar to those for the wild-type virus (39). Recent studies have confirmed these results by use of viruses which stably use tRNAHis or tRNAMet (35). Collectively, these results suggest that the selection of the primer used for reverse transcription and the inclusion of the primer in HIV-1 virions might not be linked. Previous studies from our laboratory have suggested that primer selection might be linked with viral translation (14, 15). If this is the case, the availability of certain tRNAs for use in translation could impact their selection as primers for reverse transcription. The preferential selection of Formula as the primer for HIV-1 reverse transcription might be due to a coordinated process between primer selection and viral translation. How this occurs is unknown, but the use of the E. coli Formula system will facilitate studies to explore this relationship.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the members of the Morrow laboratory for helpful suggestions. We thank Adrienne Ellis for preparation of the manuscript. The DNA sequencing was carried out by the UAB CFAR DNA Sequencing Core (AI 27767). C.D.M. acknowledges helpful suggestions from M.A.R.

A.M. was supported by training grant T32 AI 07493. This research was supported by a grant from the NIH (AI34749).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Cell Biology, 802 Kaul Building, 720 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0024. Phone: (205) 934-5705. Fax: (205) 934-5733. E-mail: caseym{at}uab.edu. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Abbink, T. E. M., N. Beerens, and B. Berkhout. 2004. Forced selection of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 variant that uses a non-self tRNA primer for reverse transcription: involvement of viral RNA sequences and the reverse transcriptase enzyme. J. Virol. 78:10706-10714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Agris, P. F., R. Guenther, P. C. Ingram, M. M. Basti, J. W. Stuart, E. Sochacka, and A. Malkiewicz. 1997. Unconventional structure of tRNA(Lys)SUU anticodon explains tRNA's role in bacterial and mammalian ribosomal frameshifting and primer selection by HIV-1. RNA 3:420-428.[Abstract]
  4. 3
  5. Cen, S., H. Javanbakht, S. Kim, K. Shiba, R. C. Craven, A. Rein, K. L. Ewalt, P. Schimmel, K. Musier-Forsyth, and L. Kleiman. 2002. Retrovirus-specific packaging of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with cognate primer tRNAs. J. Virol. 76:13111-13115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Das, A. T., B. Klaver, and B. Berkhout. 1995. Reduced replication of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mutants that use reverse transcription primers other than the natural Formula. J. Virol. 69:3090-3097.[Abstract]
  8. 5
  9. Derdeyn, C. A., J. M. Decker, J. N. Sfakianos, X. Wu, W. A. O'Brien, L. Ratner, J. C. Kappes, G. M. Shaw, and E. Hunter. 2000. Sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to the fusion inhibitor T-20 modulated by coreceptor specificity defined by the V3 loop of gp120. J. Virol. 74:8358-8367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 6
  11. Isel, C., J. M. Lanchy, S. F. Le Grice, C. Ehresmann, B. Ehresmann, and R. Marquet. 1996. Specific initiation and switch to elongation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription require the post-transcriptional modifications of primer tRNA3Lys. EMBO J. 15:917-924.[Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Isel, C., R. Marquet, G. Keith, C. Ehresmann, and B. Ehresmann. 1993. Modified nucleotides of tRNA(3Lys) modulate primer/template loop-loop interaction in the initiation complex of HIV-1 reverse transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 268:25269-25272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Javanbakht, H., S. Cen, K. Musier-Forsyth, and L. Kleiman. 2002. Correlation between tRNALys3 aminoacylation and its incorporation into HIV-1. J. Biol. Chem. 277:17389-17396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Javanbakht, H., R. Halwani, S. Cen, J. Saadatmand, K. Musier-Forsyth, H. Gottlinger, and L. Kleiman. 2003. The interaction between HIV-1 Gag and human lysyl-tRNA synthetase during viral assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 278:27644-27651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. 10
  19. Jiang, M., J. Mak, Y. Huang, and L. Kleiman. 1994. Reverse transcriptase is an important factor for the primer tRNA selection in HIV-1. Leukemia 8:S149-S151.[Medline]
  20. 11
  21. Jiang, M., J. Mak, A. Ladha, E. Cohen, M. Klein, B. Rovinski, and L. Kleiman. 1993. Identification of tRNAs incorporated into wild-type and mutant human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 67:3246-3253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. Kang, S.-M., Z. Zhang, and C. D. Morrow. 1999. Identification of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 that stably uses tRNALys1,2 rather than tRNALys,3 for initiation of reverse transcription. Virology 257:95-105.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. 13
  25. Kelly, N. J., and C. D. Morrow. 2005. Structural elements of the tRNA T{psi}C loop critical for nucleocytoplasmic transport are important for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primer selection. J. Virol. 79:6532-6539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. 14
  27. Kelly, N. J., and C. D. Morrow. 2003. Yeast tRNAPhe expressed in human cells can be selected by HIV-1 for use as a reverse transcription primer. Virology 313:354-363.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. 15
  29. Kelly, N. J., M. T. Palmer, and C. D. Morrow. 2003. Selection of retroviral reverse transcription primer is coordinated with tRNA biogenesis. J. Virol. 77:8695-8701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. 16
  31. Kohorchid, A., H. Javannbakht, S. Wise, R. Halwani, M. A. Parniak, M. A. Wainberg, and L. Kleiman. 2000. Sequences within Pr160gag-pol affecting the selective packaging of primer tRNALys,3 into HIV-1. J. Mol. Biol. 299:17-26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. 17
  33. Li, X., J. Mak, E. J. Arts, Z. Gu, L. Kleiman, M. A. Wainberg, and M. A. Parniak. 1994. Effects of alterations of primer-binding site sequences on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication. J. Virol. 68:6198-6206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Lobo, S. M., and N. Hernandez. 1989. A 7 bp mutation converts a human RNA polymerase II snRNA promoter into an RNA polymerase III promoter. Cell 58:55-67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. 19
  37. Mak, J., M. Jiang, M. A. Wainberg, M.-L. Hammarskjold, D. Rekosh, and L. Kleiman. 1994. Role of Pr160gag-pol in mediating the selective incorporation of tRNALys into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 particles. J. Virol. 68:2065-2072.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. 20
  39. Mak, J., and L. Kleiman. 1997. Primer tRNAs for reverse transcription. J. Virol. 71:8087-8095.[Medline]
  40. 21
  41. Marquet, R., C. Isel, C. Ehresmann, and B. Ehresmann. 1995. tRNAs as primer of reverse transcriptases. Biochimie 77:113-124.[Medline]
  42. 22
  43. McClain, W. H., K. Foss, R. A. Jenkins, and J. Schneider. 1990. Nucleotides that determine Escherichia coli tRNAArg and tRNALys acceptor identities revealed by analyses of mutant opal and amber suppressor tRNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9260-9264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. 23
  45. Moore, K. L., B. R. Kosloff, N. J. Kelly, R. L. Kirkman, L. C. Dupuy, S. McPherson, and C. D. Morrow. 2004. HIV type 1 that select tRNAHis or tRNALys1,2 as primers for reverse transcription exhibit different infectivities in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 20:373-381.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. 24
  47. Panet, A., and H. Berliner. 1978. Binding of tRNA to reverse transcriptase of RNA tumor viruses. J. Virol. 26:214-220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. 25
  49. Peters, G., and J. E. Dahlberg. 1979. RNA-directed DNA synthesis in Moloney murine leukemia virus: interaction between the primer tRNA and the genome RNA. J. Virol. 31:398-407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. 26
  51. Ratner, L., A. Fisher, L. L. Jagodzinski, H. Mitsuya, R.-S. Liou, R. C. Gallo, and F. Wong-Staal. 1987. Complete nucleotide sequences of functional clones of the AIDS virus. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 3:57-69.[Medline]
  52. 27
  53. Shiba, K., T. Stello, H. Motegi, T. Noda, K. Musier-Forsyth, and P. Schimmel. 1997. Human lysyl-tRNA synthetase accepts nucleotide 73 variants and rescues Escherichia coli double-defective mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 272:22809-22816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. 28
  55. Sprinzl, M., N. Dank, S. Nock, and A. Schon. 1991. Compilation of tRNA sequences and sequences of tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:2127-2171.[Free Full Text]
  56. 29
  57. Stello, T., M. Hong, and K. Musier-Forsyth. 1999. Efficient aminoacylation of tRNALys,3 by human lysyl-tRNA synthetase is dependent on covalent continuity between the acceptor stem and the anticodon domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 27:4823-4829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. 30
  59. Tamura, K., H. Himeno, H. Asahara, T. Hasegawa, and M. Shimizu. 1992. In vitro study of E. coli tRNAArg and tRNALys identity elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 20:2335-2339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. 31
  61. Temin, H. M. 1981. Structure, variation and synthesis of retrovirus long terminal repeat. Cell 27:1-3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. 32
  63. Tisne, C., M. Rigourd, R. Marquet, C. Ehresmann, and F. Dardel. 2000. NMR and biochemical characterization of recombinant human tRNALys,3 expressed in Escherichia coli: identification of posttranscriptional nucleotide modifications required for efficient initiation of HIV-1 reverse transcription. RNA 6:1403-1412.[Abstract]
  64. 33
  65. Wakefield, J. K., H. Rhim, and C. D. Morrow. 1994. Minimal sequence requirements of a functional human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primer binding site. J. Virol. 68:1605-1614.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. 34
  67. Wakefield, J. K., A. G. Wolf, and C. D. Morrow. 1995. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 can use different tRNAs as primers for reverse transcription but selectively maintains a primer binding site complementary to Formula. J. Virol. 69:6021-6029.[Abstract]
  68. 35
  69. Wei, M., S. Cen, M. Niu, F. Guo, and L. Kleiman. 2005. Defective replication in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 when non-Formula primers are used for reverse transcription. J. Virol. 79:9081-9087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. 36
  71. Wei, X., J. M. Decker, H. M. Liu, Z. Zhang, R. B. Arani, J. M. Kilby, M. S. Saag, X. Wu, G. M. Shaw, and J. C. Kappes. 2002. Emergence of resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in patients receiving fusion inhibitor (T-20) monotherapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1896-1905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. 37
  73. Yu, Q., and C. D. Morrow. 2000. Essential regions of the tRNA primer required for HIV-1 infectivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:4783-4789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. 38
  75. Yu, Q., and C. D. Morrow. 2001. Identification of critical elements in the tRNA acceptor stem and T{Psi}C loop necessary for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity. J. Virol. 75:4902-4906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. 39
  77. Zhang, Z., S. M. Kang, A. LeBlanc, S. L. Hajduk, and C. D. Morrow. 1996. Nucleotide sequences within the U5 region of the viral RNA genome are the major determinants for an human immunodeficiency virus type 1 to maintain a primer binding site complementary to tRNAHis. Virology 226:306-317.[CrossRef][Medline]


Journal of Virology, October 2006, p. 9641-9650, Vol. 80, No. 19
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/JVI.00709-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCulley, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morrow, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCulley, A.
Right arrow Articles by Morrow, C. D.