Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2006, p. 8824-8829, Vol. 80, No. 17
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00910-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390,1 Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 021152
Received 3 May 2006/ Accepted 14 June 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are nine subtypes of HIV-1 and 15 circulating recombinant forms, with Nefs varying considerably from subtype to subtype (19, 37). In fact, Nef is one of the most variable proteins of HIV, being second only to envelope. Furthermore, SIV Nefs, which share virtually all in vitro activities of HIV Nefs, are even more divergent (5, 9, 13, 39, 41, 42). Nef demonstrates several in vitro activities believed to be central to its pathogenic role in infection. They include enhancement of virus particle infectivity, modulation of cell surface molecules (e.g., CD4, major histocompatibility class 1 [MHC-I], and CD74), and the activation of the cellular p21-activated protein kinase 2 (Pak2) (3, 46). It has been postulated that the complex biology of Nef is regulated through conformational changes induced by cellular location and by specific interactions with other cellular proteins involved in intracellular trafficking (2). How this mechanism of regulation is maintained in an ever-changing protein of only 27 kDa is an important biological question that remains unresolved.
Functional exchange of alternative PASMs between Nefs from different subtypes. We recently identified a surface on HIV-1 Nef that is specific for one of the multiple in vitro activities of Nef, the activation of Pak2 (1, 33). This surface is composed of at least four amino acids exhibiting a tendency to change in conjunction with the ability of Nef to activate Pak2. These covariant amino acids (85, 89, 188, and 191, numbered according to reference 33) are within 6 to 10 Å of each other and form what could be a binding pocket that is critical for the stability and perhaps even for binding to a member of the Nef-Pak2 complex (1, 33). Nef consensus sequences from HIV-1 subtypes B and E encode V85H89R188F191 and F85F89A188R191, respectively, at those positions. Differences in amino acid residues surrounding this pocket could be tolerated by the properties of the residues introduced (hydrophobicity, charge, etc.) and the covariance of nearby residues. Even though certain substitutions, such as those present in the prototypic subtype B Nef encoded by HIV-1SF2 (L85H89K188F191), are functional, in general, subtype B or E Nef mutants with corresponding single-amino-acid substitutions at these sites fail to activate Pak2 (33). For example, the product of the single subtype B to subtype E F191R mutation in SF2 Nef was completely devoid of the ability to activate Pak2 (33). However, when the remaining three amino acids were exchanged for those present in subtype E Nef, the resulting Pak2-activating structural motif (PASM) was found to be fully functional (33). Thus, introduction of an F85F89A188R191 subtype E PASM into subtype B SF2 Nef was fully functional (33).
Subtypes E and C are highly prevalent viruses in southeast Asia and Africa (45). Their Nefs contain different PASMs (F85F89A188R191 and F85F89H188H191) (31, 33) that when substituted into the prototypic subtype B SF2 Nef result in functional proteins (33). To fully define the identities of these two PASMs as distinct motifs, we evaluated the specific contribution of the amino acid present at position 188. By exchanging the alanine and histidine at this position, we evaluated the F85F89H188R191 and F85F89A188H191 PASMs in the context of HIV-1SF2 Nef. As can be seen in Fig. 1, SF2-derived Nefs harboring the new motifs had reduced abilities to activate Pak2 compared to SF2-derived Nefs harboring F85F89A188R191 and F85F89H188H191 (66% ± 21% and 44% ± 12% reduction, respectively [three experiments]). These results highlight the contribution of the residue present at position 188 to the activation of Pak2 in the context of alternative PASMs. These data also define F85F89A188R191 (prevalent in subtype E Nefs) and F85F89H188H191 (prevalent in subtype C Nefs) as alternative Pak2-activating structural motifs specific to these highly relevant subtypes.
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Residues A188 and H188 are components of the F85F89A188R191 and F85F89H188H191 alternative Pak2-activating structural motifs. The indicated amino acid substitutions (top) were introduced into SF2 Nef by PCR-based mutagenesis and cloned into pcDNA3.1 and the resultant plasmids transfected into 293T cells. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Nef antiserum. (Middle) Immunocomplexes were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay as previously described (4, 14, 33, 47). (Bottom) Western blot analysis of Nef proteins present in cell lysates. Activation (n-fold) over that of SF2 Nef is indicated for one representative experiment out of three. Ctrl, control (empty-vector-transfected cells).
|
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Subtype B Nef isolates harboring alternative PASMs activate Pak2. (A) The amino acid compositions of chemically synthesized primary subtype B Nef isolates (1R3 and L588) or SF2 Nef-derived mutants derived by PCR-based mutagenesis are indicated (top). Nef genes were cloned and transfected as described for Fig. 1. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Nef antiserum. (Middle) Immunocomplexes were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay as previously described (4, 14, 33, 47). (Bottom) Western blot analysis of Nef proteins present in cell lysates. Asterisks denote synthetic Nef isolates 1R3 (AF120749) and L588 (AF082375). Ctrl, control (empty-vector-transfected cells). Activation (n-fold) over that of SF2 Nef is indicated for one representative experiment out of two. (B) HIV-1 subtype B Nef isolates or SF2 Nef mutants were cloned into pLXSN before transduction of CEM cells and staining for analysis of cell surface CD4 and MHC class I levels as previously described (33). The percentage of total cells for each quadrant is shown in each lower-right corner. Results for one representative experiment out of two are shown. (C) Patient isolate (1R3 and L588) Nef amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw) and compared to the SF2 sequence and a subtype B consensus sequence (33). Only the residues differing from those in the consensus sequence are shown. Gaps or deletions are represented by dashes. Note the four-amino-acid duplication in SF2 Nef (R22AEP25) and the five-amino-acid deletion in isolate 1R3 (K152VEEA156), which explain their different electrophoretic mobilities.
|
Subtype C Nefs display structural plasticity within their Pak2-activating structural motifs. Subtype C viruses account for 50% of all HIV-1 infections worldwide and are the predominant species in southern and eastern Africa and parts of Asia (12, 27, 45). The extended HIV-1 subtype C consensus sequence in the Pak2-activating motif illustrates the diverse nature of amino acids at positions 85 (F, 73%; V, 20%; L, 4%; I, 3%), 89 (F, 95%; W, 4%; L, 1%), 188 (S, 39%; H, 22%; Q, 20%; L, 11%; M, 3%; R, 1%; N, 1%; E, 1%; A, 1%), and 191 (R, 73%; H, 22%; Y, 5%) (31). As shown in Table 2, the analyzed Nefs have the most common amino acids at positions 85 and 89; amino acid S, H, or M at the highly diverse position 188; and all possible amino acids at position 191. The analyzed Nef clones correspond to the near-full-length genomes obtained as dominant viral variants during short-term coculture with donors' peripheral blood mononuclear cells (31). Our previous studies on viral molecular characteristics (26, 28, 31, 32) and frequencies of the MHC class I and II HLA alleles (25, 29) showed that the analyzed Nef isolates represent the overall high viral diversity in the HIV-1 subtype C epidemic. We analyzed the Nefs from five subtype C HIV isolates obtained from asymptomatic blood donors in Botswana (Table 1) for the ability to activate Pak2. Four of the five subtype C Nefs analyzed showed levels of Pak2 activation similar to those obtained with the prototypical subtype B SF2 Nef (Fig. 3A). Isolate AF443074 was the only Nef defective for Pak2 activation. This observation was unexpected since AF443074 Nef harbors the most prevalent PASM in subtype C Nefs, F85F89S188R191 (Table 2, consensus sequence). F85F89S188R191 is also the second-most-prevalent PASM in subtype E Nefs (33). However, AF443074 Nef is the most divergent from a consensus subtype C Nef sequence derived from a published database (http://www.aids.harvard.edu/lab_research/consensus_sequence/Nef.pdf) (Fig. 3D) (31). Analysis of the AF443074 Nef amino acid sequence revealed multiple amino acid substitutions that could account for its multiply defective phenotype (Fig. 3A to D). For example, M75, K78, and V80 within the SH3-binding domain of Nef could be disruptive since this domain has been shown to be critical for the downregulation of MHC-I, the enhancement of infectivity, and the activation of Pak2 (10, 16, 48). Isolate AF443093 showed the highest (fourfold over that of SF2 Nef) Pak2 activity of the five subtype C Nefs studied (Fig. 3A). AF443093 contained a Y at position 191 (Table 2). This result suggests that a tyrosine at this position in the context of an F85F89H188Y191 motif could result in a subtype C Nef hyperactive for Pak2 activation.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Amino acid residues of alternative subtype C Nef Pak2-activating structural motifsa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. HIV subtype C-infected patient dataa
|
![]() View larger version (78K): [in a new window] |
FIG.3. Analysis of subtype C Nef function. (A) HIV-1 subtype C Nef isolates from Botswana were subcloned into pcDNA3.1 as previously described (33). A plasmid expressing HA-tagged Pak2 was cotransfected into 293T cells with each of the Nef-expressing plasmids, the lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antiserum, and the immunocomplexes were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay (top) as previously described (4, 33). Western blot analysis for Nef and HA-tagged Pak2 expression is shown in the middle and lower panels, respectively. Activation (n-fold) over that of SF2 Nef is indicated. Results for one representative experiment out of three are shown. (B) HIV-1 subtype C Nef isolates were analyzed for cell surface CD4 and MHC class I levels as described for Fig. 2 (33). The percentage of total cells for each quadrant is shown in each lower-right corner. Ctrl, control (empty-vector-transduced cells); 74, AF443074; 93, AF443093; 97, AF443097; 98, AF443098; 110, AF443110. Results for one representative experiment out of two are shown. (C) HIV-1 subtype C Nef isolates were analyzed for the ability to upregulate CD74 expression essentially as described previously (40, 43). Dark solid line, cells transfected with Nef expression plasmids; dashed line, cells transfected with the empty vector pCGCG. The NA7 primary Nef isolate described in reference 23 was used as a control. Results for one representative experiment out of two are shown. (D) Subtype C Nef amino acid sequences from patient isolates were aligned using ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw) and compared against a subtype C consensus sequence (31). Note the five-amino-acid insertion in AF443074 Nef (R26KTEP30) and the E66 deletion in AF443093 Nef, which explain their different electrophoretic mobilities.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3 Continued.
|
While we cannot completely rule out a role in maintaining structural integrity, evidence seems to indicate that the Pak2-activating structural motif has a more active role. The number of hydrophobic residues present on a solvent exposed surface, the covariance of specific sets of residues, and the specific abrogation of Pak2 activation by a minimally disruptive F-to-Y substitution argue in favor of a binding site. Here, we demonstrate that the plasticity exhibited by the Nef Pak2-activating structural motif extends to HIV-1 subtype C, the most predominant HIV-1 subtype in the worldwide epidemic (12, 14, 27, 33). Blocking the positive effect of Nef on viral replication, its direct pathogenicity, or its immune evasion effects would potentially have great therapeutic synergy when combined with highly active antiretroviral therapy (38). The number of functional alternative PASMs identified so far (e.g., L85H89K188F191, F85F89H188H191, and F85F89A188R191 in subtype B, C, and E Nefs, respectively) suggests that when attempting to target Nef, subtype-specific antiviral strategies should be considered (17, 38). This becomes particularly important when considering that viral genetic diversity, as defined by subtype designation, may give rise to differential propensities towards antiviral resistance between viruses from different geographical locations (45). In fact, subtype C HIV-1 has been shown to have a reduced threshold for the development of resistance against tenofovir in vitro (8). To that end, it should be noted that most current antiretroviral drugs were designed after subtype B isolates, which have also been used to generate most data on mechanisms of drug resistance (20). In addition, it has been shown that amino acid pairs 85/89 and 188/191 of subtype B Nef lie within immunodominant regions in HIV that are consistently a target of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) across multiple ethnicities (15). The amino acid pair 85/89 is also within the immunodominant regions of subtype C viruses (28). Therefore, immune pressure may not only drive viral escape but also result in the modification of the amino acids that compose the Pak2-activating structural motif. The ability of Nef to mutate amino acids within immunodominant epitopes and covary distant amino acids to restore its function and positive effects on viral replication could contribute to the high viral loads observed in the face of a strong CTL response (30). The direct correlation between viral loads and host CTL responses against Nef directly contrasts with the inverse correlation displayed by the structural and more constrained (and thus less variable) p24 Gag protein (30). Our results indicate that further investigation towards the elucidation of non-subtype B HIV protein structure-function relationships to complement the current knowledge regarding subtype B HIV proteins is warranted. Our work shows that the dynamic evolution that Nef has undergone has resulted in a remarkable functional plasticity that extends across subtypes and will impact the design of future antivirals and vaccines for HIV, particularly if other HIV proteins are found to display similar mechanisms to maintain a balance between viral fitness and viral escape.
This work was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant AI-33331 from the National Institutes of Health.
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»