Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2006, p. 8510-8520, Vol. 80, No. 17
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00420-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Ingo Bussmeyer,1,
Björn Rabe,1
Joachim Grötzinger,1
Enge Sudarman,2
Jutta Eichler,2
Udo Conrad,3
Stefan Rose-John,1* and
Jürgen Scheller1
Department of Biochemistry, Christian Albrechts Universität, Kiel, Germany,1 Gesellschaft für Biotechnologische Forschung GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany,2 Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben (IPK), Gatersleben, Germany3
Received 28 February 2006/ Accepted 7 June 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor (IL-6-R, IL-11-R, Epstein-Barr virus-induced protein 3 [subunit of Il-27], and CNTF-R) (62, 72, 76). Human IL-6 first binds to a cell surface receptor (IL-6-R) and thereupon associates with the signal-transducing protein gp130. Dimerization of gp130 leads to the activation of kinases of the JAK family and of the STAT1 and STAT3 transcriptional activators (19, 76).
A naturally occurring soluble form of the IL-6-R (sIL-6-R) was found in various body fluids (27, 50). sIL-6-R together with IL-6 can stimulate cells that express only gp130 (38, 76), which was named transsignaling (60, 68). Furthermore, it was shown that the sIL-6-R strongly sensitizes IL-6-responsive target cells (59). transsignaling cell types that are exclusively responsive to IL-6/IL-6-R but not to IL-6 alone include hematopoietic progenitor cells (61), endothelial cells (67), osteoclasts (77), smooth muscle cells (32), and neuronal cells (39, 40).
Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), or Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, was first identified by Chang et al. (12) in Kaposi's sarcoma tissues of AIDS-infected persons and appears to be the first member of the human gammaherpesviruses (rhadinoviruses). HHV-8 is linked to the development of Kaposi's sarcoma as well as primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) (11, 47) and multicentric Castleman's disease (MCD) (53, 74). It has also been associated with multiple myeloma (63, 65). Similar to other human herpesviruses, HHV-8 has a particular cell tropism, infecting predominantly endothelial and other mesenchymal cells as well as B lymphocytes.
Viral IL-6 (vIL-6) (48) encoded by HHV-8 is a structural homologue of human IL-6 (huIL-6) and murine IL-6 and affects the cells via binding to the signal transducer gp130 (26). Although cellular and viral IL-6 proteins show only
25% sequence homology, the crystal structure of a receptor complex demonstrated a strong relationship of the binding epitopes to their receptors (15, 44). vIL-6 protein folds, as most cytokines do, into so-called four-helical bundles (7, 23).
Viral IL-6 mimics a number of huIL-6 activities such as stimulation of IL-6-dependent B-cell-line growth (9) and activation of the JAK/STAT signal transduction pathway in HepG2 cells (44). There is still debate about the involvement of the IL-6-R in cellular responses to vIL-6. Whereas vIL-6 responses were shown to be blocked by neutralizing IL-6-R monoclonal antibodies (9), other groups have questioned the requirement of IL-6-R for vIL-6-induced activation of cells (33, 44, 46, 78).
Viral IL-6 is constitutively expressed in lytically infected Kaposi spindle cells and AIDS-related B-cell lymphoma cell lines (BCBL and PEL) (45) and in Castleman's disease (56) and induces proliferation, angiogenesis, and hematopoiesis in IL-6-dependent cell lineages (26, 45). Furthermore, viral IL-6 can serve as an autocrine growth factor for PEL cell lines (30). Expression of vIL-6 accelerates hematopoiesis and induces vascular endothelial growth factor, a factor implicated in PEL and Kaposi's sarcoma pathogenesis (3).
However, the precise role of vIL-6 in HHV-8 pathogenesis is not well understood. Viral IL-6 may act as an antiapoptotic factor for the survival of HHV-8-infected cells and/or promote the proliferation of HHV-8-infected cells or potential host cells. In lymphoma cells infected with HHV-8, the viral cytokine protects cells against innate immune defenses triggered by viral infection via blocking of the interferon signaling pathway (13).
Recombinant soluble gp130Fc (sgp130Fc), consisting of the extracellular domain of human gp130 fused to the constant region of a human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) heavy chain (31), was shown to specifically inhibit cellular responses via the IL-6/sIL-6R complex, whereas cellular responses triggered by IL-6 alone remained unaffected. The sgp130Fc protein is expected to be a valuable therapeutic tool to specifically block disease states in which soluble IL-6-R trans signaling responses exist (5, 8, 29, 51) and might also be used to block vIL-6-induced signals (46).
Here, we report the isolation and characterization of a human recombinant antibody recognizing viral IL-6, which might be used as a molecular tool for the specific inhibition of signaling induced by vIL-6 but not by huIL-6 or IL-6/sIL-6R. Specific recombinant antibodies binding to vIL-6 were selected from an unbiased human synthetic VH-plus-VL single-chain variable fragment (scFv) library by phage display screening. One of the single-chain Fv fragments isolated (called monoclonal anti-vIL-6 [MAV]) bound to vIL-6 but not to huIL-6. Moreover, MAV was found to specifically inhibit vIL-6-mediated growth of the PEL-derived cell line BCBL-1. It was reported previously that secretion of vIL-6 is not necessarily needed for signal induction. Moreover, vIL-6 seems to have the ability to induce signals by an autocrine mechanism that relies on intracellular binding to its receptor gp130 within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (43). Therefore, we decided to use MAV as an intrabody (antibodies for intracellular applications) to influence the intracellular localization of vIL-6. Intrabodies have been successfully used to intracellulary modulate the function of proteins in various applications (32-34). The ER retention signal KDEL (58, 69) was fused to the C terminus of MAV at the cDNA level. The cDNA coding for MAV-KDEL was transiently transfected into COS-7 cells. The antibody localized in the ER could then bind viral IL-6 and prevent its further transport via the secretory pathway to the cell membrane, leading to an abrogation of vIL-6 signaling.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cloning of MAV-KDEL, vIL-6-green fluorescent protein (GFP), vIL-6-KDEL, and vIL-6. Standard cloning procedures were performed as described previously by Sambrook et al. (70). The ER retention signal KDEL was added to the C terminus of MAV by PCR (MK404 [5'-GTGGTTTAAACCTAGAGTTCGTCTTTCCGCGGATTCAGATCCTCTTCTGA-3'] and MK304 [5'-ATG GCC GAG GTG CAG CTG-3']). The signal peptide needed for eukaryotic expression of MAV-KDEL was amplified from human IL-6 (MK104 [5'-CA CGT TTA AAC GCC ACC ATG AAC TCC TTC TCC ACA-3'] and MK704 [5'-CAA CAG CTG CAC CTC GGC CAT CAC GTG TAC TGG GGC AGG GAA GGC-3']), fused to MAV-KDEL by slicing by overlapping extension PCR (25, 28), and cloned into vector p409B. The resulting plasmid was named p409B-MAV-KDEL. vIL-6 was amplified by PCR (MK504 [5'-CA CTA GCT AGC GCC ACC ATG TGC TGG TTC AAG TTG-3'] and MK604 [5'-CCG CTC GAG CTT ATC GTG GAC GTC AGG-3'], template p409-vIL-6) and inserted into plasmid pcDNA3.1-GFP via NheI and XhoI digestion, leading to pcDNA3.1-vIL-6. To generate an ER-retained vIL-6 expression construct, vIL-6 was amplified by PCR (5'-TAC TAC TCG AGG CCA CCA TGT GCT GGT TCA AGT TG-3' and 5'-TAT TGC GGC CGC CTT ATC GTG GAC GTC AGG-3') and inserted into pDCC-MAV-KDEL opened with XhoI and NotI, leading to pDCC-vIL-6-KDEL. As a control, vIL-6 was also amplified by PCR (5'-TAC TAC TCG AGG CCA CCA TGT GCT GGT TCA AGT TG-3' and 5'-CGCGGATCCCTACAGATCCTCTTCTGAGAT-3') and cloned into pDCC-vIL-6-KDEL opened with XhoI and BamHI, leading to pDCC-vIL-6.
Expression of recombinant vIL-6. EBNA cells expressing vIL-6 were grown in culture medium containing 10% FCS to 80 to 100% confluence. The medium was then changed to FCS-free medium, and expressed vIL-6 protein was collected in the supernatant for 7 days. Fifty milliliters of cell culture supernatant was centrifuged and incubated at room temperature (RT) with 300 µl Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) agarose (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) for 2 h. The agarose was washed with phosphate buffer containing 500 mM NaCl at pH 7.4, and recombinant vIL-6 was eluted with the same buffer containing 0.5 M imidazole and dialyzed to 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, without imidazole.
Phage display. The phage display screening was done as described previously (41). Briefly, panning of two phage libraries (A and B; MRC) was done in 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc Maxisorb) coated at 4°C overnight with 1 µg/well purified Flag-vIL-6-His. Three rounds of biopanning were carried out against vIL-6 immobilized on microtiter plates. Eluted phages were used to infect TG1 cells and were rescued with M13Ko7 helper phage. The culture supernatant, containing the polyclonal phage populations from each round of biopanning, was used to assess the binding to vIL-6 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To assess the binding of monoclonal phage scFvs, single colonies from titration plates of the third round were cultured and analyzed by ELISA. Clones that gave the highest signals were selected to infect Escherichia coli HB2151 cells to express soluble scFvs. Infected HB2151 cells were induced by IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside), and the supernatant containing the soluble scFvs was analyzed by ELISA.
ELISAs. Microtiter plates were coated with 10 µg/ml vIL-6 (or other antigens for cross-reactivity ELISA) or 1 µg/mls gp130Fc for the sandwich ELISA and incubated at RT overnight. The wells were blocked with 3% BSA for 2 h at RT. Specific binding of scFvs to vIL-6 or to the vIL-6/sgp130Fc complex (sandwich ELISA) or of Flag-tagged vIL-6 to sgp130Fc was detected by ELISA with an anti-c-myc antibody or with an anti-Flag antibody, respectively, and anti-mouse antibodies conjugated with alkaline phosphatase followed by incubation with substrate (1 mg/ml p-nitrophenylphosphate in diethanolamine buffer). The color intensity was measured as extinction at 405 nm using an ELISA reader.
Production and purification of soluble MAV. The MAV coding sequence was cut out from pIT1-MAV (library vector) by NcoI and NotI and inserted into the pET22b vector via NcoI and NotI. pET22b encodes the PelB leader sequence, which is a signal peptide for periplasmic expression of the gene of interest. The antibody sequence together with the PelB leader was then cloned into vector pET23a-SM12 (our unpublished results) by XbaI and NotI, so that MAV obtained C-terminal c-myc and His tags. E. coli BL21 cells were transformed with vector pET23a-MAV. Transformed E. coli BL21 cells were grown with shaking at 37°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.5. Periplasmic expression of MAV was induced by adding 0.4 mM IPTG to cells and shaking them overnight at 30°C. The bacterial culture was centrifuged at 6,000 x g for 20 min. The supernatant containing soluble scFv was purified with Ni-NTA agarose. One hundred milliliters of the bacterial supernatant was incubated with 0.5 ml Ni-NTA agarose (QIAGEN, Germany) at RT for 2 h. The matrix was then washed with 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 500 mM NaCl, and bound MAV was eluted with 0.5 M imidazole in the same buffer and dialyzed to 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, without imidazole.
CD spectroscopy. Circular dichroism (CD) measurements were carried out using a Jasco 720 CD spectrometer equipped with a temperature control unit and calibrated with a 0.1% aqueous solution of d-10-camphorsulfonic acid according to the method described previously by Chen and Yang (14). The spectral bandwidth was 1.5 nm. The time constant was 2 s, and the cell path length was 0.1 mm.
Calculation of protein concentrations. Protein concentrations were calculated from absorption spectra in the range of 240 to 320 nm using the method described previously by Waxman et al. (79).
Western blot analysis. For Western blotting of cell lysates, cells from a 10-cm dish were lysed with 1 ml 2x Laemmli buffer (36), 10 µl of which was applied to a sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel. To analyze the proteins of the cell supernatant, 15 µl out of 5 ml was used. Proteins separated by SDS-PAGE were transferred for 1 h at 1 mA/cm2 to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked for 1 h in 6% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-Tris-buffered saline (TBS). The filters were then incubated with an appropriate antibody before being labeled with a secondary antibody coupled to peroxidase. Subsequently, the membranes were developed with the Amersham enhanced chemiluminescence kit in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Band intensities were estimated from photographic films by densitometry using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
Immunoprecipitation of vIL-6 with MAV. COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with p409-vIL-6 using the DEAE-dextran method (42, 64). The next day, DMEM containing 10% FCS was changed to 5 ml FCS-free DMEM. After 24 h, the supernatant was removed and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 2 min to remove cell debris. One milliliter of supernatant containing vIL-6 was incubated with 15 µg of MAV at 4°C overnight under continuous rolling. Immunocomplexes were collected with 25 µl Talon beads (Dynal) during incubation at 4°C for 2 h. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-Tween and PBS buffers, the MAV/vIL-6 complexes were eluted with 20 µl 0.5 M imidazole in PBS. The eluates were separated by SDS-PAGE, and Western blotting was done using anti-vIL-6 serum as described above.
Surface plasmon resonance. Forty micrograms of recombinant vIL-6 in 10 mM Na-acetate, pH 5.5, was immobilized onto a surface plasmon resonance sensorchip (IAsys). The binding experiment was performed at room temperature with different concentrations of MAV using the IAsys optical biosensor. Affinograms were analyzed by nonlinear regression with FASTfit software, which uses the Marguard-Levenburg algorithm for iterative data fitting (54).
Immunostaining of transfected COS-7 cells. Approximately 40,000 COS-7 cells grown on glass coverslips for 24 h were washed with PBS containing 0.1% acid and fixed with cold methanol at 20°C for 10 min. The cells were then washed two times with TBS and incubated with blocking buffer (1% BSA, 0.2% glycerine, TBS) at room temperature for 2 h. A 1:100 dilution of the anti-c-myc antibody was applied at 4°C overnight. The cells were washed with TBS-Tween and TBS and incubated with the Alexa Fluor 594 anti-mouse antibody at 37°C for 1 h. The washing was repeated as before, and the glass coverslips were mounted onto slides with SlowFade Light (Molecular Probes) and analyzed using fluorescence microscopy. A x543 magnification was used to photograph the cells.
Proliferation assay. BCBL-1 and Ba/F3-gp130 cells were washed three times with sterile PBS and resuspended in RPMI medium containing 10% FCS at 5 x 103 cells per well of a 96-well plate. The cells were cultured in a final volume of 100 µl for 72 h and subsequently pulse-labeled with 0.25 µCi [3H]thymidine for 4 h. The specific activity of [3H]thymidine was 25 Ci/mmol. Cells were harvested on a glass fiber filter (Filtermat A; Wallac, Turku, Finland), and the filter was baked in a microwave oven for 2 min. Subsequently, the filter was soaked in 4.5 ml liquid scintillation cocktail (Betaplate Scint; Wallac, Turku, Finland). [3H]thymidine incorporated into cellular DNA was determined by scintillation counting using a MicroBeta TriLux counter from Perkin-Elmer (Wellesley, MA). Bioassays were performed, with each value being determined in triplicate.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-helical spectrum (Fig. 1B). The purified vIL-6 variants were biologically active, as shown by the induction of proliferation of the cytokine-dependent murine pre-B-cell line Ba/F3-gp130 (Fig. 1C). Native Ba/F3 cells proliferate in the presence of the cytokine IL-3. After stable transfection of a cDNA coding for gp130, these cells (Ba/F3-gp130), in the absence of IL-3, gain the ability to proliferate in the presence of IL-6/sIL-6-R, hyper-IL-6 (a fusion protein of IL-6 and sIL-6-R) (21), or viral IL-6. Previous studies have shown that Ba/F3-gp130 cells proliferate in response to hyper-IL-6 at a concentration below 1 ng/ml, whereas 100 ng/ml of viral IL-6 was needed to induce Baf/3-gp130 cell proliferation (26, 46).
|
For the production of recombinant antibodies against vIL-6, phage display technology was chosen (for a review, see reference 17), and the Tomlinson A and B libraries (T. Tomlinson, MRC, Center for Protein Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom), comprising 109 scFv fragments, were used. The libraries are based on a single human framework for the variable regions of heavy (VH) and light (VL) human immunoglobulin chains, in which the CDR3 loops have been randomized in sequence and length (for a detailed protocol, see http://www.mrc-cpe.cam.ac.uk/g1p.php?page=1808). After three rounds of panning and selection, clones were tested to bind to vIL-6 as soluble scFvs. Only two clones did not cross-react with other irrelevant proteins (data not shown). Sequencing of these two independently selected clones revealed that they were identical, suggesting that in the course of two different selection experiments, the same antibody fragment had been isolated. This underlines the specificity of the screening process. Thus, we obtained one vIL-6-specific scFv antibody, named MAV.
Expression, purification, and characterization of MAV by Western blot, immunoprecipitation, and ELISA and in a vIL-6-phospho-STAT3 assay. Next, MAV was produced in milligram amounts by periplasmic expression of the recombinant protein in E. coli and purified using Ni-NTA agarose (Fig. 2A).The purified recombinant antibody fragment MAV was analyzed by ELISA for specific binding to vIL-6. Different antigens were coated at a concentration of 10 µg/ml and 0.5 µg MAV per well. MAV bound to Flag-vIL-6-His and His-vIL-6 but did not exhibit any cross-reactivity with other antigens such as huIL-6, His-tagged OSM, BSA, lysozyme, ABI3 (66), and sgp130Fc (Fig. 2B). Because Flag-vIL-6-His was used as a coating antigen for the panning, it was important to test the MAV reactivity with the Flag and His tags. Specific binding of MAV to His-vIL-6 suggested that MAV did not recognize the Flag tag. Only Flag-vIL-6-His and His-vIL-6 were recognized by the scFv antibody MAV. Also, the lack of binding to the His-tagged OSM suggested that there was no cross-reactivity with the His tag.
|
The kinetics of MAV binding to vIL-6 immobilized on a solid phase were analyzed by surface plasmon resonance. Hence, a plot of multiple Kon values, derived from a full interaction experiment, allowed the determination of kass (gradient) and kdiss (intercept), which were 14,500.5 M1 s1 and 0.005012 s1, respectively. In this way, the affinity of MAV for vIL-6 was defined as follows: dissociation equilibrium constant = kdiss/kass = 340 nM (data not shown).
To identify the epitope of vIL-6 that is recognized by MAV, several chimeric proteins of human and viral IL-6 were used (B. Rabe and J. Scheller, unpublished results). huIL-6 as well as vIL-6 have a four-helical structure (24). gp130 receptor binding sites of these cytokines are defined as site II, composed of helix A and helix C, and site III, consisting of the initial part of the AB loop and helix D. The chimeric proteins represent the huIL-6 sequence with the exchange of sites II and III of vIL-6 (Fig. 3). Because MAV specifically binds to vIL-6 but not to huIL-6, these chimeras can be used to define which region of vIL-6 is recognized by MAV (1, 2). As shown by Western blotting, MAV recognized vIL-6 and the chimera II+III, which has the complete receptor binding sites II and III of vIL-6 (Fig. 3). Because MAV did not bind to the chimeras A, C, and A+C, one can conclude that the binding epitope of vIL-6 to MAV is not on site II. MAV binding to chimera II+III suggests that site III of vIL-6 can be the recognition site for MAV. However, the AB loop of site III does not seem to be involved in the binding of MAV, because MAV does not bind to the AB chimera. Therefore, we assume that the D helix of site III of vIL-6 is necessary for recognition by MAV. The lower signal intensity of MAV recognizing the chimera II+III compared to that of wild-type vIL-6 indicates that MAV might bind to a conformational epitope rather than to a simple linear epitope. This was further supported by ELISA data, in which folded vIL-6 and the folded chimera II+III were detected with comparable efficiencies (data not shown).
|
|
The proliferation of the vIL-6-dependent PEL-derived cell line BCBL-1 can be inhibited by recombinant MAV. PEL is a distinct type of lymphoma associated with Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection. Among others, vIL-6 has been described to be a factor responsible for the unrestrained proliferation of the PEL-derived cell line BCBL-1. BCBL-1 cells were found to release huIL-6 and vIL-6 in culture supernatant (30). Here, we have tested whether recombinant MAV can inhibit the proliferation of BCBL-1 cells. For a control, we have used recombinant sgp130Fc, which has previously been shown to specifically inhibit vIL-6-mediated signaling and transsignaling mediated by huIL-6 in complex with soluble IL-6-R (46). sgp130Fc consists of the complete extracellular part of gp130 (domains 1 to 6) fused to a dimerization domain (Fc part of a human IgG antibody) (31). As depicted in Fig. 5, the proliferation of BCBL-1 cells could be blocked by MAV and sgp130Fc by more than 50%. We conclude from this experiment that MAV specifically inhibits vIL-6-mediated growth of the PEL-derived BCBL-1 cell line.
|
|
Cotransfection of vIL-6-GFP and MAV-KDEL into COS-7 cells should result in the intracellular binding of vIL-6-GFP to MAV-KDEL and in the retention of MAV-KDEL/vIL-6-GFP in the endoplasmic reticulum. This was demonstrated by Western blotting of the lysates and supernatants of the cotransfected COS-7 cells (Fig. 6B). Only a very faint band corresponding to vIL-6-GFP was detected in the cell supernatant, suggesting that a very small amount was secreted in the presence of MAV-KDEL.
The expression of MAV and vIL-6-GFP and their localization within the cell were monitored by immunostaining of transfected COS-7 cells. As expected, MAV-KDEL was seen in the region of the endoplasmic reticulum, and no plasma membrane staining was detected (Fig. 6C, panel IV). Strong fluorescence of the ER suggested a high expression level of vIL-6-GFP (Fig. 6C, panel II). Secretion of vIL-6-GFP was seen in vesicles as green dots (Fig. 6C, panel II, white arrows) and observed as green fluorescence in the region of the plasma membrane.
In double-transfected cells, intracellular colocalization of vIL-6 and MAV-KDEL could be observed as yellow staining caused by the overlay of green (vIL-6-GFP) and red (MAV-KDEL-Alexa Fluor 594) fluorescence (Fig. 6C, compare panels V, VI, and VII).
Finally, we asked whether ER retention of vIL-6 in MAV-KDEL cotransfected cells would lead to reduced STAT3 phosphorylation (Fig. 6D). Therefore, we transfected COS-7 cells with 0.5 µg and 0.25 µg of the expression plasmids coding for vIL-6 and 3 µg of expression plasmids coding for MAV-KDEL or GFP. We found a clear reduction of vIL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in the presence of MAV-KDEL, indicating that the retention of vIL-6 in the ER led to the inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation. Quantification of the phospho-STAT3 Western blots by densitometry showed that we achieved a reduction of 30% when 0.5 µg vIL-6 and MAV-KDEL plasmids were transfected and a reduction of 69% when 0.25 µg vIL-6 and MAV-KDEL plasmids were transfected. It should, however, be noted that such a quantification is only an approximation and not an absolutely accurate method to measure the amount of phospho-STAT3 protein.
We conclude from these experiments that the neutralization of vIL-6 is feasible from within the cell and that such a strategy can lead to the neutralization of vIL-6 activity.
Recently, it was reported that vIL-6 has the ability to transduce signals from within the cell. It was speculated that only a small proportion of synthesized vIL-6 is secreted and that intracellular signal activation via a vIL-6-gp130 interaction in the ER is predominant (43). To evaluate this model and to demonstrate the relevance of our scFv-vIL-6-ER retention strategy, we generated a vIL-6 cDNA C-terminally fused to the ER retention signal KDEL. Interestingly, vIL-6 protein could be detected in the lysate of HepG2 cells transiently transfected with a cDNA coding for vIL-6 or vIL-6-KDEL (Fig. 7A). Due to the ER retention signal, vIL-6-KDEL could be detected at higher amounts in cell lysates than vIL-6, which was also secreted into the supernatant (Fig. 7C and data not shown). Interestingly, cells transfected with a cDNA coding for vIL-6 or vIL-6-KDEL were found to have identical STAT3 phosphorylation intensities (Fig. 7B), indicating that both intracellular and secreted vIL-6 can induce gp130 signal transduction. We stimulated untransfected HepG2 cells with 4-h conditioned medium of vIL-6- or vIL-6-KDEL-transfected HepG2 cells and analyzed STAT3 phosphorylation to see whether any biologically active vIL-6-KDEL was secreted. As expected, untransfected HepG2 cells treated with conditioned medium of vIL-6-transfected HepG2 cells showed phosphorylated STAT3, whereas untransfected HepG2 cells treated with conditioned medium of vIL-6-KDEL-transfected HepG2 cells showed only unphosphorylated STAT3 (Fig. 7C), indicating that the ER retention of vIL-6-KDEL was complete. The concentration of vIL-6 in the conditioned medium was under the detection limit by Western blotting (data not shown). These data support the model that an active vIL-6-gp130 signal transduction complex can be formed within the cell.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we aimed to produce recombinant human antibodies against viral interleukin-6 for the neutralization of the biological effect of vIL-6. Encoded by HHV-8, vIL-6 is believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of Kaposi's sarcoma-associated diseases.
Importantly, vIL-6 stimulates cells expressing gp130 on their surface without the need of the membrane IL-6-R. Recombinant soluble gp130 blocks the antiapoptotic affect of vIL-6 mediated via membrane-bound gp130 (46). On the other hand, soluble gp130 is an inhibitor of human IL-6 responses that are dependent upon sIL-6-R and is therefore a therapeutic tool to specifically block disease states in which IL-6 transsignaling responses exist (31). A highly specific inhibitor of vIL-6 can be a specific antibody against the viral cytokine. Therefore, an antibody screened from a phage display human library is a promising candidate for the therapy of these diseases.
Bacterially produced vIL-6 showed only low biologic activity. Therefore, we produced vIL-6 in a mammalian expression system using EBNA-293 cells stably transfected with vIL-6 cDNA, which led to vIL-6 with high biological activity and correct folding as determined by CD spectroscopy. Moreover, bacterial proteins are usually unglycosylated, and vIL-6 N-glycosylation at position N89 was previously reported to be important for the biological activity of the cytokine and for stimulating vIL-6-dependent cell proliferation (20).
Flag-vIL-6-His was purified in the milligram range from EBNA-293 cell culture supernatants and used for the production and characterization of recombinant antibodies. Phage display technology provides a means by which high-affinity, fully human monoclonal antibodies can be rapidly isolated and also provides a starting point from which a selected antibody can, if necessary, be affinity maturated for improved neutralization potency or binding kinetics (6, 41, 73).
One scFv antibody fragment called MAV that was specific for vIL-6 was selected from Tomlinson library A (T. Tomlinson, MRC, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom). A high specificity of MAV for vIL-6 binding was observed by ELISA. Importantly, MAV was not cross-reactive with other antigens and did not bind to human IL-6. The fact that MAV recognized vIL-6 by both ELISA and Western blotting makes the antibody a suitable immunological reagent to detect vIL-6. Furthermore, MAV is capable of recognizing vIL-6 in solution, as was demonstrated when vIL-6 secreted into the supernatant of transfected COS-7 cells was precipitated by MAV. The fact that MAV precipitated unglycosylated as well as glycosylated vIL-6 demonstrated that there was no reactivity of MAV with carbohydrate moieties.
The MAV binding epitope of vIL-6 was identified on the D helix of site III. As previously described, site III of vIL-6 is the binding site for the gp130 receptor (4). If MAV and gp130 interact with the same vIL-6 epitope, the binding of MAV to vIL-6 in vivo should abrogate the signaling that occurs upon vIL-6 binding to gp130 (4). This was shown to be true, since MAV did not recognize vIL-6 when it was bound to gp130, whereas vIL-6 was readily detected when vIL-6 was adsorbed to the ELISA well directly (Fig. 6C). Stimulation of HepG2 cells with vIL-6 resulted in the phosphorylation of STAT3 (44). Stimulation of vIL-6 in the presence of MAV led to decreased STAT3 phosphorylation (from 100% to 18%) in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, we demonstrated the inhibition of the growth of the PEL-derived BCBL-1 cell line by recombinant MAV. MAV was able to inhibit the proliferation of BCBL-1 cells by more than 50%. A complete inhibition of BCBL-1 cell proliferation could not be observed, most likely because BCBL-1 cells are dependent not only on vIL-6 as an autocrine or paracrine stimulatory factor but also on other factors such as IL-10 (30).
An elegant study by Corte-Real et al. recently demonstrated the general feasibility of the intrabody technology to specifically eliminate HHV-8-infected cells. Those authors used a cytoplasmic intrabody directed against the HHV-8 gene product LANA. LANA is expressed in every BCBL-1 cell and is necessary for the maintenance and segregation of the viral episome. Blockade of LANA in BCBL-1 cells led to a loss of the viral episome during transient transfection of the anti-LANA intrabody (18). As we and others have demonstrated, BCBL-1 cells are only partly dependent upon the presence of vIL-6. Moreover, vIL-6 expression was detected in less than 2% of the cells (10). Due to the low transfection efficacy of BCBL-1 cells and the small number of BCBL cells that express vIL-6, we first chose to demonstrate the universal application of MAV as a vIL-6 neutralizing intrabody in COS-7 cells. Studies of the stable transfection of MAV-KDEL into BCBL-1 cells will have to be undertaken in the future to demonstrate the biologic consequences of a stable blockade of vIL-6 in these cells.
Secreted proteins like vIL-6 are transported in vesicles from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and then to the plasma membrane. ER-resident proteins are returned to the ER due to their COOH-terminal retention signal, KDEL. Synthetic fusion of a retention sequence to a protein, which originally does not have such a sequence, leads to the inhibition of its secretion and to its localization in the ER. For example, recombinant human IL-6 carrying a retention signal accumulated within the ER and therefore retained IL-6-R in the ER. This led to a complete loss of cell surface expression of IL-6-R on IL-6-KDEL-expressing cells (69). Here, we constructed an anti-vIL-6 antibody (MAV) carrying the ER retention signal (KDEL). Antibody retention in the ER was demonstrated by transfection of COS-7 cells with a plasmid encoding MAV-KDEL. Cotransfection with vIL-6 resulted in the intracellular binding of vIL-6 to the antibody and in the retention of vIL-6/MAV-KDEL in the ER. Using this cell model system, secretion of vIL-6 was completely eliminated. Recently, a model of an intracellular signaling mechanism of vIL-6 was reported (43), and this model is further supported by our data. It was shown that only a small proportion of synthesized vIL-6 is secreted and that intracellular signal activation via a vIL-6-gp130 interaction in the ER is predominant. A fusion of vIL-6 to the ER retention signal KDEL abolished the secretion of vIL-6 but not signaling; therefore, the MAV-KDEL antibody might have an effect by not only specifically blocking vIL-6 secretion but also by neutralizing vIL-6-induced signaling from within the cell. In the present study, the blockade of vIL-6 secretion from cells cotransfected with MAV-KDEL cDNA was demonstrated, and it was shown that this retention led to a subsequent reduction of STAT3 phosphorylation, indicating that vIL-6 retention within the ER abrogates vIL-6 signaling. For a targeted gene therapeutic approach of HHV-8-associated diseases, the anti-vIL-6 antibody MAV fused to the endoplasmic retention sequence KDEL (MAV-KDEL) will be useful. In this case, an expression plasmid coding for MAV-KDEL would have to be introduced into HHV-8-infected cells. Another strategy was recently presented by Cohen-Saidon et al., who described the direct delivery of single-chain Fv-transacting transcriptional activator fusion proteins into living cells. The HIV transacting transcriptional activator protein can enter and leave cells in an unconventional manner (16) and has therefore been used as a molecular tool for the delivery of proteins into living cells.
In summary, we have selected the first human recombinant antibody against vIL-6 encoded by HHV-8, which might be a promising candidate for the therapy of HHV-8-associated diseases. As described in this work, the antibody specifically recognizes and binds to native vIL-6. In vivo, MAV reduces the effect of viral IL-6 by the inhibition of vIL-6-induced signaling from inside and outside of a cell and inhibits the proliferation of the PEL-derived BCBL-1 cell line. Based on this work, a large variety of additional fusion proteins may demonstrate the potential of recombinant antibody engineering for generating novel therapeutic strategies.
. . . . . .
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to S.R.-J. (SFB415, project C6).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
M.K. and I.B. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
Present address: North-West Cancer Research Fund Institute, University of Wales, Bangor, United Kingdom. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|