Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 2006, p. 8069-8080, Vol. 80, No. 16
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00013-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Cancer Research Institute,1 Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California2
Received 3 January 2006/ Accepted 31 May 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the unique features of JSRV is that the envelope (Env) protein is the viral oncogene. The Env protein alone can induce transformation of rodent and chicken fibroblasts and rodent epithelial cells in culture (2, 13, 17). JSRV and the Env protein can also induce rapid tumor formation in experimental lamb and mouse models, respectively (16, 26). However, the mechanism(s) by which the Env protein transforms cells is still not completely understood. The env gene is expressed as a polyprotein that is cleaved at the cell surface by a cellular protease to generate two proteins, surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM). While SU is responsible for receptor binding, TM spans the lipid bilayer of the viral membrane or the cellular plasma membrane and it anchors SU to the virion or cell via disulfide linkages. The TM protein is composed of three distinct regions: extracellular, membrane spanning, and cytoplasmic tail. We and others have previously reported that the cytoplasmic tail of JSRV TM is necessary to induce transformation of rodent fibroblasts (15).
The cytoplasmic tail of JSRV is only 46 amino acids and does not contain any evident enzymatic domains, such as that of a protein kinase. The cytoplasmic tail does have one tyrosine residue that is in the sequence YRNM (amino acids 590 to 593) (15). If the tyrosine were phosphorylated, this motif would match docking sites for either the p85 regulatory component of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K; YXXM) or growth factor receptor binding protein 2 (YXN) (24). Mutation of the tyrosine amino acid at position 590 (Y590) and methionine at position 593 (M593) abrogated transformation in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, while mutation of the asparagine at position 592 (N592) did not, which suggested a role for the PI3K signaling pathway in Env-induced transformation (15). Consistent with the mutational analysis, JSRV-transformed fibroblast cells display constitutive phosphorylation (activation) of Akt/protein kinase B, a downstream target of PI3K, and Akt phosphorylation was sensitive to treatment with PI3K inhibitors (1). We subsequently observed that PI3K is not absolutely required for JSRV transformation since JSRV could transform cells in which PI3K function was blocked (12). Nevertheless, in these cells, constitutive phosphorylation of Akt was still observed. This suggests that JSRV Env can also induce PI3K-independent phosphorylation of Akt. Other groups have concluded that the tyrosine in the YXXM motif is also not essential for transformation, although transformation was greatly reduced upon mutation of Y590 (2, 10). This has raised the possibility that the cytoplasmic tail indirectly activates the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. In addition, in primary and established chicken fibroblasts, both the YXXM motif and Akt phosphorylation are dispensable for transformation (27). We have suggested that multiple mechanisms and pathways may be involved in JSRV Env transformation and that the relative importance of particular pathways may depend on the species and cell type used in the assay (7).
Recently, we identified several signaling pathways that play key roles in transformation (11). Experiments performed with both rodent fibroblast and epithelial cells revealed that signaling through the H/N-Ras-MEK-MAPK and Akt-mTOR pathways was important for JSRV Env-induced transformation, with the H/N-Ras-MEK-MAPK pathway appearing to play a more critical role. In addition, the p38 MAPK pathway had a negative regulatory effect on transformation via regulation of MEK1/2 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) activity.
Although the requirement for the cytoplasmic tail in JSRV Env-induced transformation is well established, there have been minimal mutational analyses beyond the YXXM motif to determine what regions or amino acids in the cytoplasmic tail are important for transformation. In this report, we performed a comprehensive mutational analysis to examine the role of each amino acid of the cytoplasmic tail in transformation of rodent fibroblast and epithelial cells. The results led to the identification of three functional subdomains with regard to transformation. Analysis of individual mutants provided insight into the transformation process.
|
|
|---|
Transformation assays were performed as described previously (11, 13). Briefly, 2 x 106 NIH 3T3 or 208F cells were seeded in 10-cm dishes or 7.5 x 105 RK3E cells were seeded in 6-cm dishes. After overnight incubation, cells were transfected with 28 µg of plasmid DNA for 10-cm dishes (13) or 2.5 µg of DNA for 6-cm dishes (11) as described previously using the CalPhos mammalian transfection kit (Clontech) or FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche). Cells were cultured for up to 4 weeks posttransfection with medium changes every 3 days. Cells were examined under phase-contrast microscopy at 3 to 4 weeks and scored for foci. Cell lines transformed by wild-type JSRV Env (pCMV3JS21
GP) or a mutant Env were derived from a single focus of RK3E cells transformed by the respective plasmid. To examine the effects of signaling inhibitors on focus formation, RK3E or 208F cells were subjected to FTI-277, U0126, SB202190, rapamycin, or PP2 (Calbiochem) with daily medium changes at the concentrations indicated.
Plasmid constructs.
All Env mutation and truncation plasmids were constructed in the context of the wild-type JSRV Env expression plasmid pCMV3JS21
GP (13) or its Flag-tagged version (11) (Fig. 1). To construct the alanine scanning mutants, site-directed mutagenesis was used to convert each of the 46 amino acids (aa) of the cytoplasmic tail (aa 570 to 615) to alanine. All other amino acid substitutions were also constructed by site-directed mutagenesis methods. To create the cytoplasmic tail truncation plasmids, PCR products were generated that deleted 3, 6, 9, or 12 amino acids from the C terminus.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Expression plasmids used. Diagrams of the expression plasmids used in these experiments are shown. JSRV Env (pCMV3JS21 GP) expresses wild-type JSRV Env from a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter (13), and the Flag-tagged version is also shown. Wild-type JSRV Env was derived from a full-length JSRV provirus driven by the CMV promoter in place of the upstream viral U3 enhancer/promoter sequences; an internal deletion removed the coding sequences for all genes except env. SU and TM indicate domains of the Env gene; the JSRV long terminal repeat (LTR) is at the 3' end of these constructs, and the R and U5 regions of the LTR are also present at the 5' end. The organization of GFP expression plasmids is also shown. pEGFP contains the enhanced GFP protein driven by the CMV promoter. The 18-aa amphipathic helix from JSRV (aa 570 to 587) was cloned in frame and upstream of EGFP in amphipathic helix-GFP; Gray-shaded boxes, hydrophobic residues; diagonal striped boxes, hydrophilic residues. Variants of these plasmids, in which the hydrophobic residues were mutated (hydrophilic-GFP) and in which the hydrophilic residues were mutated (hydrophobic-GFP), are also shown.
|
All plasmids were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Immunofluorescence assays. To analyze the localization of Env protein in transfected 208F cells, indirect immunofluorescence assays were performed. Cells were seeded at 7.5 x 104 in four-well chamber slides. After overnight incubation, cells were transfected with 1 µg of plasmid DNA by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). At 48 h posttransfection, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), dried, and fixed with acetone. Fixed cells were incubated with polyclonal antibody to Flag tag (5 µg/ml; Sigma) for 30 min at 37°C. After being washed with PBS, cells were incubated with goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Molecular Probes) for 30 min at 37°C. After being washed with PBS, cells were covered with VectaShield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) plus DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) and observed using a fluorescent microscope.
GFP localization and mitochondrial staining. To analyze the localization of GFP fusion protein in transfected 208F cells, cells were seeded at 7.5 x 104 in four-well chamber slides. After overnight incubation, cells were transfected with 1 µg of plasmid DNA by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). At 48 h posttransfection, live cells were stained with MitoTracker Red 580 (200 nM; Molecular Probes) in growth medium for 45 min at 37°C. After being washed with fresh growth medium, cells were fixed with growth medium containing 3.7% formaldehyde for 15 min at 37°C. After being washed with PBS, cells were permeabilized with acetone to improve signal retention (as per the manufacturer's protocol). Cells were again washed with PBS and subsequently covered with VectaShield plus DAPI and observed using a fluorescent microscope.
Immunoblotting. Cell were lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (20 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 2 mM EDTA, and complete protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) for 15 min. Protein samples (5 to 10 µg per sample) were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and immunoblot analysis. An anti-Flag polyclonal antibody (Sigma) was used as the primary antibody to detect the Flag epitope. Antibodies against Akt, phospho-Akt (Ser473), p38, and phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) (Cell Signaling) were also used as primary antibodies. A goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Pierce) was used as a secondary antibody. Blots were visualized by the SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Transformation efficiencies of cytoplasmic tail mutants. The transformation efficiencies in RK3E cells of alanine mutations at each of the residues in the cytoplasmic tail (CT) are shown relative to that of wild-type JSRV Env (JSRV Env; pCMV3JS21 GP). Standard assay conditions were used, as described in Materials and Methods. Each mutant was tested three times relative to wild-type Env, and the averages ± standard deviations for each mutant compared to the wild type are shown. Similar assays with NIH 3T3 and 208F fibroblasts gave comparable relative efficiencies for all of the mutants. Typical numbers of foci for wild-type JSRV Env ranged from 40 to 100 foci per plate (see Tables 1 to 5).
|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Expression of JSRV Env mutants. Selected Flag-tagged alanine mutation expression plasmids were transfected into human 293T cells, and cell lysates were prepared 48 h after transfection. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by Western blotting with an anti-Flag polyclonal antibody as described in Materials and Methods. The region of the Western blot corresponding to the JSRV Env TM protein (37 kDa) is shown. The more slowly migrating bands correspond to uncleaved or partially cleaved Env polyproteins. The blots were stripped and reprobed with an antibody to ß-actin, as shown at the bottom of the figure, to monitor equal loading of cell extracts.
|
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Membrane localization of Env mutants. Expression constructs for Flag-tagged mutant Env proteins were transfected into 208F cells, and 48 h later, the cells were fixed and stained with a primary anti-Flag and a fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-tagged secondary antibody as described in Materials and Methods. Immunofluorescent microscopy of the cells is shown.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Signal transduction in JSRV-transformed cells. Signal transduction pathways activated in JSRV-transformed cells are shown, as reported by Maeda et al. (11). Depending on the cell line, the relative importances of signaling through Akt-mTOR and through H/N-Ras are different, although in all cases, signaling through MEK1/2 is essential for transformation. In contrast, p38 negatively affects transformation. This figure is adapted from that of Maeda et al. (11).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Effect of rapamycin on transformation by JSRV Env mutants in RK3E cellsa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of the H/N-Ras inhibitor FTI-277 on transformation by JSRV Env mutants in RK3E cellsa
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. p38 and AKT phosphorylation in transformed cells. Transformed foci from RK3E cells transformed by wild-type and mutant JSRV Env proteins were picked and purified. For comparison, RK3E cells stably transfected with the pcDNA3.1 plasmid were also isolated. Cells were grown in low-serum media, cell extracts were prepared and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and Western blotting was performed with antibodies for either phospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) and total p38 (A) or phospho-Akt (Ser 473) and total Akt (B). (A) Three independent wild-type JSRV Env transformants were studies (clones 1 to 3) in addition to two supertransformers, Q597A and H598A. (B) Two independent wild-type JSRV Env transformants were studied (clones 1 and 2). The H587A mutant has reduced transforming potential, while the other three mutants shown are supertransformers.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Effect of the p38 inhibitor SB202190 on transformation by JSRV Env mutants in RK3E cellsa
|
Role of MEK1/2 in mutant Env transformation. We previously reported that while inhibition of H/N-Ras results in a partial reduction of transformation activity for wild-type JSRV Env in RK3E cells, blocking the downstream effector MEK1/2 results in complete abrogation of transformation. These results suggested that the Env protein signals to MEK1/2 by H/N-Ras-dependent and -independent mechanisms and that activation of MEK1/2 is essential for Env-mediated transformation. It seemed possible that the supertransformers might additionally be utilizing a MEK1/2-independent pathway for transformation. To test this, we performed transformation assays in the presence or absence of the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126. All supertransforming Env mutants were dependent on MEK1/2 for transformation (Table 4). Thus, transformation by the supertransforming JSRV Env mutants did not involve activation of MEK1/2-independent mechanisms.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Effect of the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126 on transformation by JSRV Env mutants in RK3E cellsa
|
Transformation activity can be dependent on amino acid substitution. To determine whether the charge of the amino acid selected for the mutational analysis would alter transformation activity, we substituted aspartic acid (Asp; negative), lysine (Lys; positive), serine (Ser; uncharged polar), or isoleucine (Ile; polar) instead of alanine at four residues. One amino acid residue was selected from each transformation activity group identified in the alanine mutation: M574 (abrogated), M593 (decreased), Q597 (supertransformer), and N605 (similar). Results from triplicate transformation assays with NIH 3T3, 208F, and RK3E cells with both non-Flag- and Flag-tagged versions of mutant envelopes were comparable, and results of Western blot analysis with the Flag-tagged plasmids confirmed similar protein production levels between the wild-type and mutant envelopes (data not shown). The results of transformation assays with 208F cells are shown in Fig. 7. The transformation activity was not dependent on the amino acid substitution for positions 574 and 605. Substitution of Asp, Lys, or Ser for methionine at position 574 resulted in abrogated transformation activity similar to that of M574A, while substitution of Ile resulted in transformation activity that was greatly reduced (8% ± 1% [average ± standard deviation] of that of the wild type). At position 605, substitution of Asp, Lys, Ser, or Ile for asparagine resulted in transformation activity similar to that of wild-type Env. In contrast, transformation activity was dependent on the amino acid substitution at positions 597 and 593. For instance, substitution of Asp, Lys, or Ser for glutamine at position 597 resulted in transformation activity less than that of the wild type and substitution of Ile resulted in transformation activity similar to that of the wild type. Interestingly, substitution of the nonpolar Ile at position 597 resulted in the most efficient transformation activity among the four mutants, which correlated with the supertransforming phenotype of Q597A. Transformation activity was also dependent on amino acid substitution at position 593. Substitution of Asp, Lys, or Ser for the methionine residue at position 593 resulted in abrogated or greatly decreased transformation activity. In contrast, substitution of Ile resulted in a supertransforming phenotype.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Extended mutational analysis. Four residues in the JSRV TM cytoplasmic tail (CT) were subjected to additional mutations, M574, M593, Q597, and N605. Each residue was mutated to aspartate, lysine, serine, and isoleucine. The transformation efficiency of each mutant relative to wild-type JSRV Env in 208F cells is shown, as described for Fig. 2; the efficiencies of the alanine mutations at these residues are also shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Effect of the Src inhibitor PP2 on transformation by JSRV Env mutants in 208F cellsa
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Putative amphipathic helix in the cytoplasmic tail. The first 18 amino acids of the JSRV TM cytoplasmic tail are plotted on a helical wheel (25). The results show a strong potential amphipathic helix, with hydrophobic residues on one side (filled circles) and hydrophilic residues on the other (open circles).
|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Functionality of the putative amphipathic helix. 208F cells were transiently transfected with expression plasmids for EGFP, EGFP containing N-terminal fusions of the putative amphipathic helix of JSRV TM (residues 570 to 587), or fusions with mutant amphipathic helices (hydrophobic-GFP and hydrophilic-GFP). Fixed cells were stained with MitoTracker Red, and the same fields were imaged by fluorescent microscopy with filters specific for EGFP (left) or MitoTracker Red (middle). Merges of the red and green images are shown in the right panels. The bottom row shows images for hydrophobic-GFP; similar images were seen for hydrophilic-GFP. Note that in all three cases, not all of the cells in the field were transfected with the GFP expression plasmids; only the transfected cells show fluorescence in the left panels.
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Mutation of hydrophilic residues in the amphipathic helix. JSRV Env mutants with charge-conserving residues in the hydrophilic face of the amphipathic helix were generated (R572K and D557E). The relative transformation efficiencies of these mutants in RK3E cells are shown as in Fig. 2; the efficiencies of the alanine mutations at these residues are also shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Transformation by C-terminal truncation mutants of JSRV Enva
|
|
|
|---|
Mutations in JSRV Env protein could affect transformation in several ways. Possible mechanisms include altered protein stability, altered intracellular trafficking, altered interactions with viral proteins (homologous or heterologous), and altered interactions with cellular proteins. It is also important to consider that the JSRV Env protein carries out functions for viral replication. Thus, the cytoplasmic tail mutations could affect transformation and viral replication by independent or related mechanisms, or both. Moreover, if transformation involves interactions of distinct cellular proteins with the TM cytoplasmic tail, it is possible that interactions important for transformation could compete with those involved in replication. In terms of replication, the JSRV TM protein is likely to participate in several processes, by analogy to other retroviruses and, in particular, to the related betaretrovirus Mason-Pfizer monkey virus (M-PMV) that has been well studied (23). The cytoplasmic tail of M-PMV TM has been shown to be important for interaction with viral Gag protein (the MA domain) during viral particle morphogenesis (20), and tyrosine-containing motifs are important for intracellular trafficking (3). Indeed, a YXXL motif in M-PMV is in an analogous position to the JSRV YRNM (aa 590 to 593), and mutation of the tyrosine inhibits virion budding and release (22). The ectodomain of TM also carries a multimerization domain that results in formation of Env trimers on the surface of the virion (8). With regard to these experiments on the role of TM in transformation, the cytoplasmic tail mutations generally did not lead to loss of protein stability or trafficking to the plasma membrane, so these two processes were not likely responsible for the changes in transformation. Thus, the most likely causes for the altered transformation by the mutants would appear to be alterations in interactions with cellular or viral proteins, either by direct effects on binding of critical residues or by induced conformational changes. These transformation assays were performed with plasmids that expressed JSRV Env in the absence of other viral proteins, so potential competing interactions with Gag were not a consideration. Also, in rodent cells, the JSRV SU does not efficiently interact with the rodent homolog of the JSRV receptor (Hyal-2) (5), so Env-receptor interactions also did not likely affect the results.
Taken together, these studies allowed division of the TM cytoplasmic tail into three subdomains with regard to transformation as diagrammed in Fig. 11. The amino-terminal (juxtamembrane) 18 amino acids can be modeled as an amphipathic helix, and experiments with EGFP fusion proteins supported this conclusion. The carboxy-terminal nine amino acids were not essential for transformation, since alanine mutations in any of these residues did not affect transformation. Indeed, truncation of these amino acids also did not abolish transformation. The remaining 19 internal amino acids thus comprise the third subdomain, and they encompass the YXXM motif. Mutations in this subdomain had various effects, including the generation of supertransformers. It seems likely that interactions with cellular proteins necessary for transformation would involve residues in the internal subdomain and/or hydrophilic residues in the amphipathic helix.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Domains of the JSRV Env cytoplasmic tail. Domains of the cytoplasmic tail are diagrammed based on these studies. The amphipathic helix stretches from residues 570 to 587. C-terminal residues are not essential for transformation (residues 607 to 615). The intermediate region contains the YXXM motif, and mutations in this region can both positively and negatively affect transformation potential. MSR, membrane-spanning region of the TM protein.
|
Mutations at M593 in the YXXM motif were also informative. We previously reported that M593T abrogates transformation in NIH 3T3 cells (15), while reduced transformation is observed in rat 208F fibroblasts (7). Similarly, the M593A mutation showed partial transformation in rat RK3E cells (and also in NIH 3T3 and 208F cells) (data not shown). It was most interesting that M593I resulted in a supertransforming phenotype, and this mutation also generated a canonical c-Src SH2 domain binding motif. Moreover, transformation by M593I was partially inhibited by treatment with the c-Src inhibitor PP2. This suggests that the supertransforming phenotype of M593I may be due to increased signaling through c-Src. It was also interesting that PP2 partially inhibited transformation by wild-type JSRV Env and that YXXM is in fact a low-affinity c-Src binding site as well. This raises the possibility that wild-type JSRV may also signal through c-Src. It has also been reported that c-Src can activate Akt in a PI3K-independent fashion (4, 9), so this might explain the constitutive phosphorylation of Akt in JSRV-transformed cells with disabled PI3K (12). However, it should be noted that in order for the YXXM motif to function as a docking site for any SH2-containing protein, the tyrosine must be phosphorylated. We and others have failed to detect tyrosine phosphorylation of the TM protein in JSRV-transformed cells (7, 10), although it remains possible that this was due to technical reasons. In particular, low levels of tyrosine phosphorylation could have been sufficient for transformation. Moreover, the only method currently available to detect the Env protein is the addition of a C-terminal epitope tag; pull-downs with anti-epitope antibody could have interfered with simultaneous binding to the cytoplasmic tail (total length, 46 amino acids) of a cellular protein.
Studies of two alanine mutants with reduced transformation were also interesting. For these mutants, we hypothesized that the mutations might have eliminated signaling through one of the two pathways already known to be involved in JSRV transformation (H/N-Ras-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 and Akt-mTOR). The R591A mutant supported this hypothesis in that its reduced transformation potential was not affected by rapamycin but was more sensitive than wild-type JSRV Env to the H/N-Ras inhibitor FTI-277. Thus, R591A appears to signal through H/N-Ras-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 but not through AKT-mTOR. On the other hand, H587A was intriguing because its reduced transformation was not affected by either rapamycin or FTI-277 (although it was sensitive to the MEK1/2 inhibitor). Thus, H587A transformation may involve signaling through novel pathways or through alternates of the known pathways that are resistant to the inhibitors used. For instance, signaling from K-Ras to MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 is not affected by FTI-277, and some downstream signaling from mTOR is resistant to rapamycin (18, 19). Future studies will address these possibilities.
Many of the alanine mutations in the amphipathic helix also abrogated transformation. As mentioned above, some (but not all) of the residues in the hydrophilic face might interact with cytoplasmic proteins during transformation. Indeed, while the R572A mutation severely reduced transformation, the charge-conserving R572K mutation showed substantial transformation (ca. 50% of that of the wild type). This was consistent with R572 being involved in binding of a cellular protein for transformation. However, an alternate explanation could be that charge conservation could have a more general role. Basic residues such as R572 often surround the hydrophobic patch of amino acids in an amphipathic helix. While the hydrophobic resides can embed into membrane lipids, the surrounding positively charged amino acids can enhance membrane binding via interactions with acidic phospholipids.
It was also noteworthy that alanine substitutions in the hydrophobic face of the JSRV amphipathic helix universally abrogated transformation. This was somewhat unexpected since alanines would not be expected to disrupt the hydrophobicity of this face. In fact, others have also reported that alanine substitutions in the hydrophobic faces of other amphipathic helices can change their properties (25). Another possibility is that the hydrophobic face of the JSRV amphipathic helix could interact with hydrophobic regions of the same or other proteins within the lipid bilayer. Alanine substitutions in the hydrophobic face could alter the overall topology of the TM protein, affect multimerization, or change the interactions with other proteins. One possible candidate for interaction with the hydrophobic face of the amphipathic helix could be the membrane-spanning region of the TM protein. We recently made a chimeric JSRV Env in which the membrane-spanning portion of TM was exchanged for the analogous region of an endogenous JSRV-related Env protein (J. Lim, S. Hull, and H. Fan, unpublished data). The resulting Env protein showed changes in transforming potential that suggested alterations in the relative importance of downstream signaling pathways. Additional studies are in progress.
The cytoplasmic tail mutants generated in these studies will also be interesting to study in the context of JSRV replication. As mentioned above, the cytoplasmic tail of TM has been shown to be important for interactions with Gag protein and for efficient release of virus particles for M-PMV. Thus, it will be interesting to introduce these mutations into a full-length genomic clone of JSRV and to study the effects on virus production and replication. These experiments are also in progress.
We thank Naoyoshi Maeda and Larry Dearth for advice and Sohail Jahid for technical assistance. Support of the Cancer Research Institute and the DNA Sequencing Shared Resource of the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center is acknowledged.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»