Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2006, p. 5976-5983, Vol. 80, No. 12
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00110-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Animal Influenza Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and National Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 427 Maduan Street, Harbin 150001, People's Republic of China,1 Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan,2 Avian Zoonosis Research Centre, Tottori University, Faculty of Agriculture, 4-101 Minami, Koyama-cho, Tottori 680-8550, Japan,3 Division of Animal Production and Veterinary Medicine Bureau of Agri-Animal Production of Qinghai Province, 2 Jiaotong Road, Xining 810008, People's Republic of China,4 Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of WisconsinMadison, 2015 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706,5 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan6
Received 16 January 2006/ Accepted 13 March 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Wild aquatic birds harbor all 16 hemagglutinin (HA) and all nine neuraminidase (NA) subtypes of influenza A virus and therefore serve as the natural reservoir for this pathogen. Although influenza viruses in wild aquatic birds are occasionally transmitted to avian (e.g., chickens and turkeys) and mammalian (e.g., humans, pigs, horses, minks, whales, and seals) species, where they may produce outbreaks of severe disease, they persist in evolutionary equilibrium (stasis) in their natural reservoir and do not generally cause disease in wild waterfowl (22).
Highly pathogenic H5N1 viruses do not appear to have entered the wild-bird populations to any appreciable extent until late April to June 2005, when a large outbreak of H5N1 infection occurred in Qinghai Lake in western China (2, 12), a major breeding site for migratory birds whose flyways extend to Southeast Asia, India, Siberia, Australia, and New Zealand (4). Initial reports (2, 12) of this outbreak identified a single introduction of an H5N1 virus into four species of waterfowl, including bar-headed geese (Anser indicus), brown-headed gulls (Larus brunnicephalus), great black-headed gulls (Larus ichthyaetus), and great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo). The virus was shown to be pathogenic in chickens and mice and was shown to possess a Lys-to-Glu substitution at position 627 of PB2, an alteration previously associated with high virulence in mice and found only in H1N1 and H3N2 human isolates as well as some H5N1 isolates from humans and tigers (7, 9, 10, 19, 23) but not from wild birds.
In this report, we provide information on the magnitude of the Qinghai Lake outbreak of H5N1 viral disease, the evolution of the viruses during the course of the outbreak, subsequent transmission to birds in other remote locations, and the pathological properties of the viruses in animal models, including nonhuman primates.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. H5N1 viruses isolated from wild birds in Qinghai Lake in the present study
|
Animal experiments. The intravenous pathogenicity index (IVPI) of the isolates in chickens was determined according to the recommendations of the Office International des Epizooties (14). Briefly, groups of 10 specific-pathogen-free 6-week-old White Leghorn chickens housed in isolator cages were inoculated intravenously with 0.2 ml of a 1:10 dilution of bacterium-free virus-containing allantoic fluid (see Table 2 for titers of the isolates).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Lethality of the H5N1 avian influenza isolates in chickens and mice
|
Three-year-old, colony-bred, female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were individually placed in a negative-pressure isolator. The macaques were infected intranasally with 107 EID50 of the viruses in 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (four animals infected with A/bar-headed goose/Qinghai/1/05 [BHGs/QH/1/05], four animals infected with A/great cormorant/Qinghai/3/05 [GC/QH/3/05], and three animals infected with A/duck/Guangxi/35/2001 [H5N1] [DK/GX/35/01]). One animal from each group was euthanized on days 4 and 7 postinfection by exsanguination under ketamine anesthesia. Nasal swabs, bronchoalveolar lavage specimens, and organs from the euthanized animals were collected for virus titration and for histological and immunohistochemical examinations. The remaining animals were observed for 2 weeks. Sera collected from all animals prior to infection and 2 weeks postinfection were used to detect anti-influenza virus antibodies.
Histopathological studies. Samples of the lung, liver, spleen, kidney, pancreas, heart, muscle, trachea, proventriculus, and large intestine from naturally infected bar-headed geese and samples of tonsil, lung, liver, spleen, and heart from nonhuman primates experimentally infected with the H5N1 viruses were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution at necropsy. They were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 5-µm sections, which were then stained with routine hematoxylin and eosin (HE). For viral antigen detection, sections were processed for immunohistochemistry by a two-step dextran polymer method (DAKO Japan Inc., Kyoto, Japan) using polyclonal rabbit antibody to an H5 virus. Nonhuman primate tissues infected with DK/GX/35/01 were subjected to immunostaining to detect viral antigens; in these studies, polyclonal anti-H5 goat serum was used as a primary antibody, and peroxidase-labeled anti-goat rabbit serum served as a secondary antibody. Immunoreactions were visualized with diaminobenzidine.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences analyzed in this study are available at the Influenza Sequence Database under accession numbers ISDN137990 to ISDN138151.
|
|
|---|
On 4 May 2005, two bar-headed geese (Anser indicus) were found dead in the wetlands of Qinghai Lake, with 105 dead geese reported on the following day (Fig. 1 and 2). On 13 May, a total of 437 dead birds were collected. The species identified extended to great black-headed gulls (Larus ichthyaetus) and brown-headed gulls (Larus brunnicephalus), whose habitats on the lake overlap closely with those of bar-headed geese. Disease signs and deaths were observed among ruddy shelducks (Tadorna ferruginea) beginning on 13 May, with 90 and 12 dead shelducks collected on 24 and 25 May, respectively. A limited number of dead great cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo), gathered on two islets located 2 miles away from concentrations of bar-headed geese and gulls, were first observed on 16 May, and a large number of these birds were found dead on 24 to 26 May and 1 June (Fig. 1 and 2). Altogether, 6,184 dead gulls, geese, great cormorants, and ruddy shelducks were found from 4 May to 29 June; bar-headed geese accounted for more than half of this total. A limited number of whooper swans (Cygnus cygnus), black-headed cranes (Grus nigricollis), and pochards (Aythya ferina) also died during this outbreak.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Course of migratory waterfowl deaths due to H5N1 viruses at Qinghai Lake. A total of 6,184 dead birds were collected from 4 May to 29 June 2005: 3,282 bar-headed geese, 929 great black-headed gulls, 570 brown-headed gulls, 1,302 great cormorants, and 145 ruddy shelducks.
|
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Pattern of spread of H5N1 viruses of different genotypes among wild birds at Qinghai Lake. The disease began in bar-headed geese, spread to brown-headed gulls and great black-headed gulls, and then spread to great cormorants and ruddy shelducks. The viruses from these species represent four genotypes, two of which appear to have spread from bar-headed geese to the other three avian species, although it is uncertain whether the genotype D virus originated in the bar-headed goose population.
|
![]() View larger version (145K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Histopathologic analysis of a moribund bar-headed goose from the H5N1 virus outbreak at Qinghai Lake. (a) Brain showing scattered nonsuppurative inflammatory foci characterized by perivascular cuffing of mononuclear cells, microgliosis, degeneration of nerve cells, and edema (HE stain). (b) Brain with numerous nerve and glial cells positive for viral antigen (brown pigments) by immunohistological staining with an anti-H5 polyclonal antibody. (c) Pancreas showing scattered coagulative necrotic foci in parenchyma with nonsuppurative inflammation (HE stain). (d) Heart showing small nonsuppurative inflammatory foci with degenerating cardiomyocytes (HE stain).
|
Sequence analysis. To understand the genetic relationship between the Qinghai Lake isolates and other H5N1 viruses, we sequenced the entire genomes of the 15 isolates. Previously published sequences of H5N1 viruses isolated from the same outbreak by Chen et al. (2) and Liu et al. (12) were included in the analysis for comparison. The HA, NA, and nucleoprotein genes of all viruses isolated during the Qinghai Lake outbreak were similar to each other and closely resembled those of the A/chicken/Jiangxi/25/04 virus isolated during the 2004 outbreak in China (Fig. 4; also see Fig. S1 and S2a and b in the supplemental material). As reported previously (2, 12), all of these viruses had a series of basic amino acids at the HA cleavage site (RRRKKR) characteristic of other influenza viruses that are highly pathogenic in chickens; they also had a 20-amino-acid deletion in the NA stalk (residues 49 to 68) compared with the NA of the Goose/Guangdong/1/96 virus.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Phylogenetic analyses of the H5N1 viruses isolated during the Qinghai Lake outbreak. The phylogenetic trees were generated with the PHYLIP program of the CLUSTALX software package (version 1.81) by using the neighbor-joining algorithm and bootstrap values of 1,000. (a) HA (nucleotides 105 to 1659); (b) PB2 (nucleotides 82 to 2264); (c) PA (nucleotides 67 to 2151). The phylogenetic tree of HA was rooted to A/mallard/Denmark/64650/03 (H5N7), and the PB2 and PA phylogenetic trees were rooted to A/Memphis/1/90 (H3N2). The sequences of the wild-bird viruses obtained in this study are shown in red, and the viruses isolated after the Qinghai Lake outbreak are shown in green, while those of the wild-bird viruses reported previously by Liu et al. and Chen et al. are shown in blue. Dates of virus isolation during Qinghai Lake outbreak are also shown.
|
The phylogenetic trees of the PA (Fig. 4c), PB1, M, and NS genes (see Fig. S2c to e in the supplemental material) of these H5N1 viruses were similar to each other. BHGs/QH/2/05 and CK/Yamaguchi/7/04 were closely related to each other and formed a single clade, while the remaining viruses formed another clade. The PA gene of the BHGs/QH/2/05 virus shared less than 93% identity with other wild-bird viruses isolated at Qinghai Lake but was 98.2% identical to the corresponding gene of the CK/Yamaguchi/7/04 virus. The PB1 gene of the BHGs/QH/2/05 virus shared less than 93% identity with the other wild-bird viruses but was 98.7% identical to that of the CK/Yamaguchi/7/04 virus. Thus, the Qinghai Lake isolates represented four genotypes, genotypes A to D (Fig. 2). The BHGs/QH/2/05 (genotype B) isolate shares the PB2 gene with genotype A viruses, but four of its other genes appear to be unique among the wild-bird viruses detected in this study.
Experimental infection of chickens, mice, and nonhuman primates. Using chickens, we next tested the pathogenicity of eight H5N1 viruses, including at least one virus of each genotype, according to recommendations of the Office International des Epizooties (14). All viruses killed chickens within 24 h and had an intravenous pathogenicity index of 3.0, the highest value possible (Table 2). Similarly, in mice, all isolates, with the exception of BHGs/QH/2/05, were highly lethal when administered intranasally with an MLD50 of less than 0.5 log EID50 (Table 2). This group of lethal viruses was readily recovered from each of the organs tested, indicating its ability to cause systemic infection.
To test the pathogenic potential of these isolates in primates, we intranasally infected rhesus macaques with 107 EID50s of BHGs/QH/1/05 or GC/QH/3/05. Half of the animals infected with either virus showed an increased body temperature for 1 to 3 days (see Fig. S3a and b in the supplemental material) and anorexia on day 1 or 2 postinfection. Increased respiratory rates were observed on days 5 to 6 postinfection in all animals, but none died or showed severe symptoms during the 2-week observation period. Surprisingly, virus was not recovered by nasal swabs, lung lavages, or organ samples collected on day 4 or 7 postinfection from animals infected with either virus (Table 3), even though sera collected at 2 weeks postinfection had antibody titers of more than 1:2,000 as determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Titers of viruses isolated from rhesus macaques infected with H5N1 avian influenza virusesa
|
Necropsy of macaques on day 7 postinfection revealed a spectrum of macroscopic lesions in the lungs. A GC/QH/3/05 virus-infected animal had focal discoloration in the medial lobe, and large foci of consolidation on the accessory and lower lobes in a BHGs/QH/1/05 virus-infected animal were seen, together with prominent swelling of the lymph nodes, while extensive pulmonary consolidation was apparent on the medial and lower lobes in DK/GX/35/01 virus-infected animals. Histologically, the consolidated area seen in the BHGs/QH/1/05-infected macaque was consistent with prominent features of bronchointerstitial pneumonia with massive recruitment of lymphocytes (Fig. 5a). Prominent features within and on the periphery of the lesions included proliferative and reactive hyperplasia of alveolar cells (Fig. 5b), an accumulation of foamy macrophages in alveolar spaces (Fig. 5c), severe alveolar edema (Fig. 5d), and thickening of alveolar walls with lymphocyte recruitment (Fig. 5d, arrows). In one of the animals infected with the DK/GX/35/01 virus, foci of peribronchiolitis detected at 4 days postinfection (Fig. 5e) had progressed to a massive accumulation of foamy macrophages within alveolar spaces and severe alveolar edema by 7 days postinfection (Fig. 5f), but lymphocyte recruitment into the alveolar wall and regenerative changes of alveolar cells were rare compared with findings in the BHGs/QH/1/05-infected macaque. In sharp contrast to these observations, the lungs of animals infected with the GC/QH/3/05 virus had only small lesions consisting of focal alveolitis accompanied by hyperplasia of alveolar cells. In extrapulmonary organs, suppurative tonsillitis and systemic activation of lymph follicles were prominent by 4 days postinfection in the animal infected with BHGs/QH/1/05 virus. Viral antigens could be detected only in tonsilar epithelium on day 4 postinfection in animals infected with BHGs/QH/1/05 or GC/QH/3/05 (Fig. 5g); however, animals infected with DK/GX/35/01 showed positive reactions to anti-H5 serum in several tissues, including tonsil, lung, and spleen (data not shown). These results demonstrate the varied pathogenic potential in primates of the H5N1 viruses isolated from waterfowl.
![]() View larger version (131K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Histological findings from rhesus macaques infected with H5N1 viruses. (a) Section from a consolidated area from lungs shows bronchointerstitial pneumonia with severe infiltration of inflammatory cells (BHGs/QH/1/05 virus, day 7 postinfection) (HE stain). The lung lesions were distributed around the bronchioli. Asterisks indicate lumen of bronchioli. (b) Severe alveolar damage was observed within and along the periphery of the consolidated area (BHGs/QH/1/05 virus, day 7 postinfection) (HE stain). Severe proliferative and reactive hyperplasia of alveolar cells with massive recruitment of lymphocytes, fibrin exudates, and alveolar edema are shown. (c) A strong reaction with macrophages was one of the prominent findings in the lungs (BHGs/QH/1/05 virus, day 7 postinfection) (HE stain). (d) Severe alveolar edema, thickening of alveolar wall with lymphocyte recruitment (white arrow), and regeneration of alveolar cells (black arrow) were also observed (BHGs/QH/1/05 virus, day 7 postinfection) (HE stain). (e) The lung lesions were detected as peribronchiolitis in a macaque infected with DK/GX/35/01 virus at 4 days postinfection (DK/GX/35/01 virus, day 4 postinfection) (HE stain). The asterisk indicates lumen of bronchioles. (f) Prominent alveolar edema and strong reaction with foamy macrophages but scant regenerative change and scant lymphocytic recruitment in a macaque infected with DK/GX/35/01 virus (DK/GX/35/01 virus, day 7 postinfection) (HE stain). (g) Viral antigens in tonsilar epithelium on day 4 postinfection (brown) (BHGs/QH/1/05 virus, day 4 postinfection) (immunohistochemistry).
|
|
|
|---|
A distinct temporal pattern of infection of different avian species by the H5N1 viruses was also apparent (Fig. 1). Bar-headed geese were the first species to be affected, followed by brown headed gulls and great black-headed gulls about 10 days later (13 May) and then by ruddy shelducks and great cormorants after another 10 days (24 and 25 May). The time between the detection of small numbers of deaths (13 and 16 May) and the detection of considerably larger numbers of deaths (24 and 26 May) of ruddy shelducks and great cormorants was also about 10 days. These findings could be interpreted to indicate stepwise introduction of the virus into different avian species in the lake. Our sequence analyses revealed that at least three genotypes of H5N1 viruses were circulating among bar-headed geese, while the viruses isolated from great black-headed gulls, brown-headed gulls, great cormorants, and whooper swans were similar to each other and belonged to only one of the genotypes found in bar-headed geese (Fig. 4). Viruses representing genotypes A and B were isolated from the bar-headed geese that died early during the outbreak and were likely not spread to other species. We speculate that viruses of genotype D may also have been present in bar-headed geese at the beginning of the outbreak but were not identified because of the limited number of dead birds analyzed.
The origin of the virus responsible for the Qinghai Lake outbreak remains unclear. The disease was first recognized in bar-headed geese (Fig. 1 and 2), suggesting at least two possible mechanisms for the introduction of the H5N1 virus into wild-bird populations by this species using the lake as a habitat. One possibility is that the virus was carried to the lake by other wild birds not susceptible to H5N1 infection and was then transmitted to bar-headed geese. Another possibility is that bar-headed geese infected elsewhere were the species that brought the virus to Qinghai Lake, presumably via the East Asian-Australian flyway or the Central Asian-Indian flyway. If the first scenario is correct, the virus should have been transmitted to all susceptible species at the same time, including brown-headed gulls and great black headed gulls, which congregate with bar-headed geese in the islet where H5N1 virus-infected bar-headed geese were found. The fact that the disease was identified in these two species of gulls approximately 10 days after the discovery of fatal cases of H5N1 infection among bar-headed geese supports the second scenario.
Importantly, a genotype C virus, which was found in multiple species in Qinghai Lake, was responsible for the wild-bird outbreak of H5N1 infection in Mongolia and Russia in August 2005 and also caused major outbreaks in chickens in the Liaoning Province and Inner Mongolia in October and November 2005 (Fig. 4; see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), suggesting that viruses of this genotype may be more pernicious than those of other genotypes. These findings call for intensive surveillance of wild migrating birds as biologic vectors that possibly spread H5N1 viruses over a wide range of territories.
It is important that viruses of genotype C possess Lys at position 627 in PB2, unlike any other avian viruses, and that this residue is found in some human H5N1 (7, 9, 10) and H7N7 (5) isolates as well as in the virus responsible for the Spanish influenza pandemic (21). Thus, it is worrisome that H5N1 viruses with a trait associated with human adaptation have entered into migrating waterfowl populations.
In the present study, seven of eight test viruses replicated systemically and killed mice. Among these seven lethal viruses, five have a lysine at position 627 of the PB2 protein and one has asparagine at position 701 of this molecule. Although both of these changes are associated with high virulence in mice (6, 8, 11), our findings indicate the existence of additional mutations that contribute to the virulence of avian H5N1 viruses in mammals.
Several different animal models have been used to evaluate the virulence of avian H5N1 influenza viruses in mammals. Maines et al. demonstrated the general equivalence of mice and ferrets for assessing the pathogenic potential of H5N1 viruses isolated from chickens and humans in Thailand and Vietnam (13). Experimental infection of cynomolgous macaques with the index H5N1 virus from the 1997 outbreak in Hong Kong resulted in acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiple-organ dysfunction, which was similar to findings in humans (18, 24). By contrast, the clinical signs produced in rhesus macaques by infection with two of the Qinghai Lake isolates were quite mild. Although the A/duck/Guangxi/35/01 virus did cause systemic infection and symptoms of influenza-like illness, the extent of the disease as judged by both its clinical symptoms and histopathology was milder than that reported previously by Rimmelzwaan et al. (18). This discrepancy may reflect the experimental procedures used by Rimmelzwaan et al. and our group. While we intranasally infected macaques with 2 ml of virus in fluid, Rimmelzwaan and colleagues used 5 ml of viral fluid, applying 4 ml intratracheally, 0.5 ml to the tonsils, and 0.25 ml to each of the conjunctiva, which would be expected to induce more severe disease than that seen in our study.
In conclusion, the H5N1 viruses that caused a massive outbreak of lethal disease among wild birds at Qinghai Lake in western China represent a phylogenetically and biologically heterogeneous group reiterating the features of H5N1 viruses now circulating in nature. The fact that viruses with a PB2 mutation associated with human adaptation of avian viruses are circulating in migratory waterfowl and that an avian H5N1 virus was capable of causing systemic infection in primates is worrisome. Moreover, migratory waterfowl may possibly spread these viruses over a wide range of territories. If viruses with the ability to replicate systemically in primates establish in migratory waterfowl, there would be an even more critical need for increased surveillance of poultry and the development of control measures.
This work was supported by the Animal Infectious Disease Control Program of the Ministry of Agriculture of China; by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation 30440008; by the Chinese National Key Basic Research Program (973) 2005CB523005 and 2005CB523200; by the Chinese National S&T Plan; by Public Health Service research grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; by grants-in-aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministries of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan; and by CREST (Japan Science and Technology Agency).
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://jvi.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»