Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, June 2006, p. 5631-5636, Vol. 80, No. 11
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00219-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Two Surface-Exposed Elements of the B30.2/SPRY Domain as Potency Determinants of N-Tropic Murine Leukemia Virus Restriction by Human TRIM5
Michel J. Perron,1
Matthew Stremlau,1 and
Joseph Sodroski1,2*
Department of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Division of AIDS, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115,1
Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 021152
Received 31 January 2006/
Accepted 7 March 2006
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Human TRIM5
(TRIM5
hu) potently restricts N-tropic (N-MLV), but not B-tropic, murine leukemia virus in a manner dependent upon residue 110 of the viral capsid. Rhesus monkey TRIM5
(TRIM5
rh) inhibits N-MLV only weakly. The study of human-monkey TRIM5
chimerae revealed that both the v1 and v3 variable regions of the B30.2/SPRY domain contain potency determinants for N-MLV restriction. These variable regions are predicted to be surface-exposed elements on one face of the B30.2 domain. Acidic residues in v3 complement basic residue 110 of the N-MLV capsid. The results support recognition of the retroviral capsid by the TRIM5
B30.2 domain.
 |
TEXT
|
|---|
Primates express dominant restriction factors that block retrovirus infection soon after entry but prior to reverse transcription (1, 2, 4). Most early restriction in primates is mediated by TRIM5
(5, 6, 8, 10, 12). TRIM5
is a member of the tripartite-motif family of proteins and contains RING, B-box 2, and coiled-coil (RBCC) domains (11). TRIM5
also contains a C-terminal B30.2/SPRY domain, which is essential for antiviral activity and has been implicated in interaction with the targeted viral capsid (9, 13, 16). Species-specific differences in TRIM5
account for the patterns of restriction of retroviruses in Old World and New World primates. For example, TRIM5
hu from humans potently restricts N-tropic murine leukemia virus (N-MLV), whereas TRIM5
rh from rhesus monkeys exhibits much weaker activity against this virus (6, 7, 10, 18). On the other hand, TRIM5
rh potently blocks human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), which is only weakly inhibited by TRIM5
hu (15, 16). Four variable regions (v1 to v4) are found in the B30.2 domains of TRIM5
proteins from different primates (12, 14). Differences in the v1 regions of TRIM5
hu and TRIM5
rh account for the differences in anti-HIV-1 potency exhibited by these TRIM5
variants (9, 17, 19).
The TRIM5
region that dictates the potency of TRIM5
hu for N-MLV restriction has not been defined. To this end, we generated several chimerae between the human and rhesus TRIM5
proteins (Fig. 1A) and examined the abilities of these chimerae to restrict N-MLV and B-tropic murine leukemia virus (B-MLV) infection in transduced MDTF cells. The expression of each construct was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1B). TRIM5
hu restricted N-MLV significantly more potently than TRIM5
rh, even though the steady-state levels of TRIM5
hu expression were lower than those of TRIM5
rh (Fig. 1C). The R(H286-493) mutant, in which the TRIM5
rh B30.2 domain is replaced with that of TRIM5
hu, restricted N-MLV infection significantly more efficiently than TRIM5
rh. Thus, the B30.2 domain of TRIM5
hu contains the determinant(s) for potent N-MLV restriction.
To define further the region(s) of the B30.2 domain involved in N-MLV restriction, two reciprocal chimerae, R(H286-371) and H(R286-371), were expressed in MDTF cells. The cells were challenged with N- and B-MLV (Fig. 1C). N-MLV infection of the R(H286-371)-expressing cell line was reduced approximately two- to threefold compared with that of the TRIM5
rh-expressing cell line. The block to N-MLV infection in MDTF cells expressing the H(R286-371) chimera was almost as great as that in the TRIM5
hu-expressing cells. No difference in susceptibility to B-MLV infection was observed in any of the MDTF cell lines expressing TRIM5
variants (Fig. 1D). These findings indicate that potency determinants for N-MLV restriction reside within multiple regions of the TRIM5
B30.2 domain, consistent with previous studies (19).
The v1 region in the TRIM5
rh B30.2 domain is a major determinant of anti-HIV-1 potency (9, 17, 19). To test whether any of the TRIM5
hu B30.2 variable regions are involved in N-MLV restriction, we generated several chimerae in which a small segment of one TRIM5
rh variable region was replaced by the corresponding sequence from TRIM5
hu (Fig. 2A). We assayed for a gain in N-MLV restriction in transduced MDTF cells compared to wild-type TRIM5
rh. The steady-state levels of expression of the TRIM5
variants are shown in Fig. 2B. The Rh(SYQ/PCK) and Rh(GSFA/SFSV) mutants exhibited only modest improvements in blocking N-MLV infection compared to TRIM5
rh (Fig. 2C); apparently, these differences do not account for the potency of TRIM5
hu. By contrast, the Rh(LFTFPSLT/RYQT-FV) and Rh(QYV/ECA) mutants restricted N-MLV infection as potently as TRIM5
hu. B-MLV infection was unaffected by expression of the TRIM5
variants (Fig. 2D). We conclude that at least two potency determinants for N-MLV restriction reside within the TRIM5
hu B30.2 domain, one within the v1 region between residues 335 and 340 and another in the N-terminal portion of v3.
The presence of a positively charged arginine residue at position 110 of the viral capsid renders N-MLV susceptible to TRIM5
hu restriction (10). Alteration of this N-MLV capsid residue from an arginine to the corresponding residue in B-MLV, glutamic acid, creates NBNN-MLV, which partially escapes from TRIM5
hu restriction (10). Conversely, substitution of arginine for the glutamic acid at residue 110 of the B-MLV capsid creates BNBB-MLV, which is susceptible to TRIM5
hu restriction (10). The correlation between a positive charge at position 110 of the MLV capsid and restriction suggested the hypothesis that the negative charges within the TRIM5
v3 region (Fig. 2A) are involved in an electrostatic interaction with the viral capsid. To test this hypothesis, we generated several mutants with changes in residues 409 and 410 in the TRIM5
rh v3 region and examined their abilities to restrict N-MLV, B-MLV, NBNN-MLV,and BNBB-MLV. Mutant TRIM5
constructs were expressed stably in MDTF cells (Fig. 3A). Introduction of a negatively charged glutamic acid at residue 409 of TRIM5
rh created Rh(Q409E), which restricted N-MLV infection to a level comparable to that of TRIM5
hu. However, alteration of residue 409 to a positively charged arginine residue, Rh(Q409R), completely abrogated restriction of N-MLV. Likewise, alteration of the adjacent TRIM5
rh residue 410 from a glutamic acid to either a positively charged residue, Rh(E410R) or Rh(E410K), or an uncharged residue, Rh(E410A), also abrogated restriction of N-MLV. On the other hand, the Rh(E410D) mutant, which retains the negative charge at residue 410, restricted N-MLV as efficiently as TRIM5
rh. None of the TRIM5
rh mutants restricted B-MLV infection (Fig. 3C). These data suggest that acidic residues within the TRIM5
v3 region enable potent N-MLV restriction.
To investigate whether the N-MLV restriction observed in the mutant TRIM5
rh-expressing cell lines is dependent upon the charge at position 110 of the viral capsid, we tested whether NBNN-MLV and BNBB-MLV are sensitive to restriction in the mutant TRIM5
rh-expressing cell lines. NBNN-MLV was able to completely escape restriction by TRIM5
rh and all TRIM5
rh mutants; however, only a partial escape was observed in the TRIM5
hu-expressing cell line (Fig. 3D). Conversely, potent restriction of BNBB-MLV was observed in the TRIM5
hu- and Rh(Q409E)-expressing cell lines, whereas only a partial restriction was observed in the TRIM5
rh- and Rh(E410D)-expressing cells (Fig. 3E). There was no restriction of BNBB-MLV in the cells expressing Rh(Q409R), Rh(E410R), Rh(E410K), Rh(E410A), or Rh(Q409R/E410R). Thus, there is a correlation between the presence of negative charges at residues 409 and 410 of TRIM5
rh and restriction of an MLV containing a positively charged residue at position 110 of the viral capsid.
Our results indicate that two variable regions, v1 and v3, in the B30.2 domain of TRIM5
hu contribute to the potent restriction of N-MLV infection. Recently, the B30.2/SPRY domain has been shown to assume a ß-sandwich, lectin-like fold (5). By analogy with this structure, the major variable regions (v1 to v4) of the TRIM protein B30.2 domains (14) are predicted to be surface-exposed elements on the same face of the domain (Fig. 4A); the variable loops surround a putative ligand-binding site (5). Thus, the v1 and v3 regions of TRIM5
are well positioned to serve as determinants of interaction with the retroviral capsid.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4. Models to explain the potency of N-MLV restriction by TRIM5 variants. (A) The structure of the B30.2/SPRY domain of the human PRY-SPRY-19q13.4.1 protein (5) is shown, with the surface loops equivalent to the v1 to v4 variable regions of TRIM proteins colored (14). The strands corresponding to the v1 (blue), v2 (red), v3 (yellow), and v4 (purple) regions are labeled. The predicted locations of residues 409 and 410 on TRIM5 rh are indicated. The asterisk marks a potential ligand-binding cleft (5). The N and C termini of the B30.2/SPRY domain are labeled. (B) Electrostatic interactions between the B30.2 domain v3 region of TRIM5 and the surface of the viral capsid may modulate the potency of MLV restriction. The trimeric TRIM5 variants, with either negative (red) or positive (blue) charges in the N terminus of the B30.2 domain v3 region, are depicted. The ribbon structure of the MLV capsid hexamers is shown in a lateral view (8). From this perspective, the surface of the assembled capsid faces upward, and the interior of the capsid faces downward. The surface-exposed side chain of residue 110 is shown (arginine [blue] in N-MLV and BNBB, glutamic acid [red] in B-MLV). The presence of a single negative charge in the TRIM5 v3 N terminus allows modest restriction of N-MLV and BNBB (thin arrow). N-MLV and BNBB restriction is potentiated (thick arrow) by the addition of a second negative charge in this v3 region [as in TRIM5 hu or Rh(Q409E)]. Removal of these acidic v3 residues [in Rh(E410A)] or addition of a basic residue [in Rh(E410R), Rh(Q409R), and Rh(E410K)] completely abrogates TRIM5 restriction of N-MLV and BNBB. The negatively charged B-MLV capsid is resistant to TRIM5 -mediated restriction.
|
|
The presence of negatively charged residues at positions 409 and 410 of the TRIM5
rh B30.2 domain potentiates restriction of MLVs that have an arginine at position 110 in the capsid. Alteration of either of these acidic TRIM5
rh residues to a positively charged arginine completely abrogated TRIM5
-mediated restriction of N-MLV. It is tempting to speculate that the N terminus of the TRIM5
v3 region interacts electrostatically with the N-MLV capsid, perhaps involving capsid residue 110 (Fig. 4B). Electrostatics may also contribute to Fv-1n restriction in mice; for example, MLVs containing arginine 110 in the capsid are insensitive to Fv-1n restriction unless the positively charged lysine at position 358 of Fv-1 is removed (3). Although alteration of both TRIM5
rh residues 409 and 410 to basic residues abrogated N-MLV restriction, it did not confer the ability to restrict B-MLV. Additional studies should clarify how shape and bond formation govern the recognition of targeted retroviral capsids by TRIM5
proteins.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We thank Yvette McLaughlin for manuscript preparation.
We thank the National Institutes of Health (AI063987 and a Center for AIDS Research Award [AI60354]), the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, the Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation, the William A. Haseltine Foundation for the Arts and Sciences, and the late William F. McCarty-Cooper for financial support. M.S. was supported by a National Defense Science and Engineering Fellowship and is a Fellow of the Ryan Foundation.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, JFB 824, Boston, MA 02115. Phone: (617) 632-3371. Fax: (617) 632-4338. E-mail: joseph_sodroski{at}dfci.harvard.edu. 
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
- Besnier, C., L. Ylinen, B. Strange, A. Lister, Y. Takeuchi, S. P. Goff, and G. J. Towers. 2003. Characterization of murine leukemia virus restriction in mammals. J. Virol. 77:13403-13406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bieniasz, P. D. 2003. Restriction factors: a defense against retroviral infection. Trends Microbiol. 11:286-291.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Bishop, K. N., M. Bock, G. Towers, and J. P. Stoye. 2001. Identification of the regions of Fv1 necessary for murine leukemia virus restriction. J. Virol. 75:5182-5188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Goff, S. P. 2004. Genetic control of retrovirus susceptibility in mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:61-85.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Grutter, C., C. Briand, G. Capitani, P. R. Mittl, S. Papin, J. Tschopp, and M. G. Grutter. 2006. Structure of the PRYSPRY-domain: implications for autoinflammatory diseases. FEBS Lett. 580:99-106.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Hatziioannou, T., D. Perez-Caballero, A. Yang, S. Cowan, and P. D. Bieniasz. 2004. Retrovirus resistance factors Ref1 and Lv1 are species-specific variants of TRIM5
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:10774-10779.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Keckesova, Z., L. M. Ylinen, and G. J. Towers. 2004. The human and African green monkey TRIM5
genes encode Ref1 and Lv1 retroviral restriction factor activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:10780-10785.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Mortuza, G. B., L. F. Haire, A. Stevens, S. J. Smerdon, J. P. Stoye, and I. A. Taylor. 2004. High-resolution structure of a retroviral capsid hexameric amino-terminal domain. Nature 431:481-485.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Perez-Caballero, D., T. Hatziioannou, A. Yang, S. Cowan, and P. D. Bieniasz. 2005. Human tripartite motif 5
domains responsible for retrovirus restriction activity and specificity. J. Virol. 79:8969-8978.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Perron, M. J., M. Stremlau, B. Song, W. Ulm, R. C. Mulligan, and J. Sodroski. 2004. TRIM5
mediates the postentry block to N-tropic murine leukemia viruses in human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:11827-11832.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Reymond, A., G. Meroni, A. Fantozzi, G. Merla, S. Cairo, L. Luzi, D. Riganelli, E. Zanaria, S. Messali, S. Cainarca, A. Guffanti, S. Minucci, P. G. Pelicci, and A. Ballabio. 2001. The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments. EMBO J. 20:2140-2151.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Sawyer, S. L., L. I. Wu, M. Emerman, and H. S. Malik. 2005. Positive selection of primate TRIM5
identifies a critical species-specific retroviral restriction domain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:2832-2837.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Sebastian, S., and J. Luban. 2005. TRIM5
selectively binds a restriction-sensitive retroviral capsid. Retrovirology 2:40.[CrossRef][Medline] - Song, B., B. Gold, C. O'Huigin, H. Javanbakht, X. Li, M. Stremlau, C. Winkler, M. Dean, and J. Sodroski. 2005. The B30.2(SPRY) domain of the retroviral restriction factor TRIM5
exhibits lineage-specific length and sequence variation in primates. J. Virol. 79:6111-6121.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Song, B., H. Javanbakht, M. Perron, D. H. Park, M. Stremlau, and J. Sodroski. 2005. Retrovirus restriction by TRIM5
variants from Old World and New World primates. J. Virol. 79:3930-3937.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stremlau, M., C. M. Owens, M. J. Perron, M. Kiessling, P. Autissier, and J. Sodroski. 2004. The cytoplasmic body component TRIM5
restricts HIV-1 infection in Old World monkeys. Nature 427:848-853.[CrossRef][Medline] - Stremlau, M., M. Perron, S. Welikala, and J. Sodroski. 2005. Species-specific variation in the B30.2(SPRY) domain of TRIM5
determines the potency of human immunodeficiency virus restriction. J. Virol. 79:3139-3145.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Yap, M. W., S. Nisole, C. Lynch, and J. P. Stoye. 2004. Trim5
protein restricts both HIV-1 and murine leukemia virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:10786-10791.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Yap, M. W., S. Nisole, and J. P. Stoye. 2005. A single amino acid change in the SPRY domain of human Trim5
leads to HIV-1 restriction. Curr. Biol. 15:73-78.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Virology, June 2006, p. 5631-5636, Vol. 80, No. 11
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.00219-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wilson, S. J., Webb, B. L. J., Ylinen, L. M. J., Verschoor, E., Heeney, J. L., Towers, G. J.
(2008). From the Cover: Independent evolution of an antiviral TRIMCyp in rhesus macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 3557-3562
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
James, L. C., Keeble, A. H., Khan, Z., Rhodes, D. A., Trowsdale, J.
(2007). Structural basis for PRYSPRY-mediated tripartite motif (TRIM) protein function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 6200-6205
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perron, M. J., Stremlau, M., Lee, M., Javanbakht, H., Song, B., Sodroski, J.
(2007). The Human TRIM5{alpha} Restriction Factor Mediates Accelerated Uncoating of the N-Tropic Murine Leukemia Virus Capsid. J. Virol.
81: 2138-2148
[Abstract]
[Full Text]