Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 2006, p. 4648-4655, Vol. 80, No. 10
0022-538X/06/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.80.10.4648-4655.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laboratoire de Virologie, INTS, Paris, France 75739,1 Department of Virology and Immunology, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas 782282
Received 29 December 2005/ Accepted 20 February 2006
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the HBV replication cycle, S-HBsAg is the major component of the virion envelope, but its massive production in an infected cell leads essentially to its secretion as empty subviral particles (SVPs) through a nucleocapsid-independent mechanism (11). Mature HBV virions are assembled owing to the S-HBsAg activity for driving the budding of particles at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane and to the matrix function of the L-HBsAg for recruiting the HBV nucleocapsid in the budding particles (2). But as a consequence of its propensity for self-assembly, S-HBsAg alone can also package the HDV RNP, leading to the formation of particles that are structurally identical to mature HDV virions (42). However, the presence of L-HBsAg, along with S-HBsAg, in the envelope, is required to confer infectivity (37). The L-HDAg protein is the RNP component that mediates the interaction with S-HBsAg during HDV assembly. Interestingly, when coexpressed with the HBV envelope proteins, in the absence of HDV RNA and S-HDAg, L-HDAg is packaged and secreted in the HBV SVPs (3).
The S-HBsAg sequence contains all the information necessary for its own secretion and that of HDV. S-HBsAg proteins are synthesized at the ER membrane as glycosylated (gp27) and nonglycosylated (p24) forms; they are thought to be transported via vesicles toward the Golgi compartment and to be secreted as empty 20-nm-diameter particles after oligomerization and budding at the pre-Golgi membrane into the lumen (12, 28). At the ER membrane (see Fig. 2B), the topology of S-HBsAg has been partially elucidated: the amino terminus (residues 1 to 3) is exposed at the luminal side of the membrane; it is followed by a first transmembrane domain (TMD-I) between residues 4 and 28, a cytosolic loop between residues 28 and 80, and a second TMD (TMD-II) that anchors the polypeptide chain into the membrane in the opposite direction with respect to TMD-I. The region located between residues 100 and 164, also referred to as the antigenic loop (AGL), contains the major antigenic epitopes and a glycosylation site at Asn-146. The AGL is translocated into the ER lumen during synthesis, leading to its exposure at the surface of secreted particles. The topology of the carboxyl-terminal domain, between residues 164 and 226, is not precisely known, but the sequence is highly hydrophobic and predicted to contain two transmembrane
-helical structures (TMD-III and TMD-IV) (30).
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG.2. Schematic representation of the S-HBsAg carboxyl terminus. (A) Amino acid sequence of the carboxyl terminus of S-HBsAg. Numbers above the sequence correspond to the positions of the tryptophan residues (indicated in bold). Numbers below the sequence indicate boundaries of the predicted transmembrane domains. Open boxes represent predicted hydrophobic transmembrane domains (TMD-III and TMD-IV). (B) Schematic representation of S-HBsAg topology at the ER membrane. Open boxes represent experimentally defined (I and II) or predicted (III and IV) TMDs. Residues 24 to 28, Asn-146 (N-linked glycosylation site), and Trp-196, -199, and -201, identified as determinants of HDV maturation, are indicated in bold.
|
In addition to the glycosylation site, we previously identified two determinants of HDV maturation: (i) a sequence encompassing residues 24 to 28 at the cytosolic interface of TMD-I (16) and (ii) a sequence between residues 179 and 203 at the carboxyl terminus of S-HBsAg (17). In the latter determinant, mutation of a single amino acid (Trp-196) led to a greater than 50-fold reduction of the mutant's capacity for HDV assembly without affecting SVP secretion. Surprisingly, this phenotype was observed with the most conservative substitution, W196F. This result pointed to the crucial role of the tryptophan side chain in HDV RNP interaction. However, the ability of such a mutant for interacting with L-HDAg was not directly evaluated.
Since the carboxyl terminus of S-HBsAg (residues 163 to 226) comprises nine tryptophan residues that are conserved among all HBV genotypes, single point substitutions by alanine or phenylalanine were made to assess the function of the Trp-rich domain in HDV assembly. We report that none of the Trp substitutions had a significant effect on HBV SVP secretion, but the replacement of Trp-196, -199, and -201 with alanine or phenylalanine was detrimental to interaction of S-HBsAg with L-HDAg and, consequently, to assembly of HDV particles. The results indicate that tryptophan side chains of the short peptide sequence located between the two predicted TMDs, III and IV, are critical to HDV assembly.
|
|
|---|
24-28KL, N146T, and W196F S-HBsAg mutants have been generated by subcloning into pCI an XhoI-NotI DNA fragment that was amplified by PCR from the respective parental plasmids described previously (16, 17, 36). The parental HDV recombinant plasmid (pSVLD3) contains three head-to-tail copies of the full-length HDV cDNA (19). For construction of pCIHD24, a DNA fragment (nucleotides 1598 to 954 of the genotype 1 HDV cDNA) encoding the S-HDAg protein was amplified by PCR from pSVLD3 using 5' and 3' primers tagged with the NheI and NotI restriction site sequences, respectively. After digestion with NheI and NotI, the DNA fragment was inserted between the NheI and NotI sites of the pCI vector. Plasmid pCIHD27 was generated from pCIHD24 using the PCR mutagenesis protocol to convert the TAG stop codon of the S-HDAg gene into a TGG tryptophan codon for expression of the L-HDAg protein.
Mutagenesis was carried out using the PCR overlap extension method on the pCIHBS or pCIHD27 plasmids, with two complementary mutagenic oligonucleotides as described elsewhere (16). The mutations were designated by the one-letter code of the wild-type (wt) amino acid followed by its position in S-HBsAg and the one-letter code for the substituted amino acid. All PCR-generated fragments were cloned in the pCI vector (Promega), and the resulting mutant plasmids were verified using the Big Dye Terminator sequencing protocol (Applied Biosystems). Clones containing the desired mutations were selected and used for subsequent transfections. Plasmid pSVLD3 was used for expression of HDV RNPs, and plasmids pCIHBS, pCIHD24, and pCIHD27 were used for expression of S-HBsAg, S-HDAg, and L-HDAg, respectively.
Transfection of HuH-7 cells. HuH-7 cells were maintained in Williams' medium E supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. For production of HDV particles, cells were transfected with a mixture of HDV recombinant plasmid pSVLD3 for the synthesis of HDV RNPs and a wt or mutant pCIHBS for the supply of the wt or mutant S-HBsAg, respectively. For coexpression of L-HDAg and S-HBsAg, cells were cotransfected with a mixture of wt or mutant pCIHD27 and wt or mutant pCIHBS plasmids.
Transfection of 8 x 105 cells was carried out using the FuGENE-6 reagent (Roche) according to the instructions of the manufacturer, with 1 µg of HDV recombinant plasmid (pSVLD3 or pCIHD27) and 1 or 2 µg of pCIHBS or derivatives. Culture medium was harvested on days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 posttransfection and analyzed for the presence of viral particles by immunoblotting for detection of S-HBsAg or L-HDAg proteins and by Northern blotting for detection of HDV RNA. For analysis of cellular RNA or proteins, cells were harvested 9 days after cotransfection with pSVLD3 and pCIHBS or derivatives or 2 days after cotransfection with pCIHD27 and pCIHBS or their respective derivatives.
Characterization of HDV particles produced in HuH-7 cells. Culture fluids harvested on days 2 (or 3), 6, and 9 after transfection were clarified by centrifugation at 5,000 x g at 4°C for 30 min. Viral particles from the clarified medium were subjected to sedimentation by centrifugation for 2 h at 50,000 rpm in an SW50 rotor (Beckman) on 1 ml of a 20% sucrose cushion in 1x phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. After centrifugation, the particle-containing pellet was resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA. Disruption buffer was added, and proteins were submitted to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, and immunodetection with rabbit anti-HBsAg antibodies (R247) or human anti-HDAg antibodies (36). Immunoblots were developed by chemiluminescence (ECL kit; Amersham) and exposed to Kodak films for detection of light emission.
For HDV RNA analysis, viral particles from the clarified medium were concentrated by centrifugation as described above. RNA extraction from the concentrated particles or from cells harvested at day 9 posttransfection was carried out as described previously (15). Detection of viral or cellular HDV RNA was achieved after electrophoresis through a 1.2% agarose-2.2 M formaldehyde gel, transfer to nylon membrane (Roche), and hybridization to a 32P-labeled HDV-specific RNA probe (15).
|
|
|---|
24-28, N146T, or W196F S-HBsAg mutant. Transfected cells and culture fluids were harvested at day 2 posttransfection and analyzed for the presence of S-HBsAg and L-HDAg by immunoblotting. Control experiments consisted of the transfection of HuH-7 cells with an L-HDAg expression vector in the absence (Fig. 1, EN) or presence of a wt S-HBsAg protein expression vector. As illustrated in Fig. 1B, the
24-28 and N146T mutants were competent for incorporation and cosecretion of L-HDAg proteins in SVPs, whereas the W196F mutant appeared to have lost L-HDAg binding activity. Therefore, the defect of the
24-28 and N146T mutants for HDV particle maturation that was previously reported (16, 36) was due not to a lack of interaction with L-HDAg but, rather, to an impairment of the SVP envelope to accommodate an RNP. In contrast, the deficiency of the W196F mutant in HDV maturation is clearly the result of a lack of interaction with L-HDAg.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Analysis of 24-28KL, N146T, and W196F S-HBsAg mutants for their capacity for HDV assembly (A) and interaction with L-HDAg (B). Immunoblot analysis of S-HBsAg or L-HDAg proteins from culture supernatant (Sup) or cell lysate (Cell) was performed after transfection of HuH-7 cells with a mixture of 1 µg of HDV recombinant plasmid pSVLD3 (A) or pCIHD27 (B) and 1 µg of wt or mutant S-HBsAg plasmid DNA. Culture medium was harvested at day 2 (B) or days 4 to 10 (A) posttransfection, and particles were subjected to sedimentation by ultracentrifugation. Cells were harvested at day 2 posttransfection (A and B) and lysed in protein disruption buffer. Proteins from sedimented particles (equivalent to 1 ml of supernatant) or cell lysates (equivalent to 105 cells) were separated on a 15% acrylamide gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-HBsAg or anti-HDAg antibodies (1:1,000). For Northern blot analysis of HDV RNA, particles from culture medium (Sup) harvested at days 4 to 10 posttransfection were subjected to sedimentation, and RNA was purified using the QIAmp viral RNA extraction kit (QIAGEN). Cells were harvested at day 10 posttransfection for purification of total cellular RNA using the RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN). RNA extracted from 1 ml of culture supernatant or 5 µg of total RNA was separated on an agarose gel, transferred to nylon membrane, and hybridized to a genomic strand-specific 32P-labeled HDV RNA probe. The size in kilobases of HDV genomic RNA is indicated. The unglycosylated and glycosylated S-HBsAg (p24 and gp27, respectively) and L-HDAg ( p27) are indicated at the left side of each panel. EN, HBV env-negative plasmid.
|
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effects of tryptophan-to-alanine substitutions in the C terminus of the S-HBsAg envelope protein on the mutants' capacities for HDV maturation. (A) Immunoblot analysis of S-HBsAg proteins extracted from culture supernatant (Sup) harvested on days 3, 6, and 9 after transfection of HuH-7 cells with a mixture of 1 µg of pSVLD3 plasmid DNA and 1 µg of wt or mutant S-HBsAg plasmid DNA. Particles sedimented from 1 ml of culture medium were disrupted in Laemmli sample buffer. Proteins were separated on a 15% acrylamide gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-S antibodies (1:1,000). (B) Northern blot analysis of intracellular HDV RNA (Cell). Cellular RNA was extracted from HuH-7 cells harvested at day 9 posttransfection. Five micrograms of total RNA was separated on an agarose gel and analyzed for the presence HDV RNA after transfer to nylon membrane and hybridization to a genomic strand-specific 32P-labeled HDV RNA probe. (C) Northern blot analysis of HDV RNA extracted from 1 ml of cell culture supernatant (Sup) harvested on days 3, 6, and 9 after transfection. RNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis, transfer, and hybridization to a genomic strand-specific 32P-labeled HDV RNA probe as for panel B. Numbers at the bottom of panel C are the percentages of HDV RNA incorporated by wt S-HBsAg, normalized to the same amount of secreted S-HBsAg. Quantitation was performed using the NIH Image software, version 1.63. The unglycosylated and glycosylated S-HBsAg (p24 and gp27, respectively) are indicated. EN, HBV env-negative plasmid.
|
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effects of tryptophan-to-alanine substitutions in the C terminus of the S-HBsAg envelope protein on the mutants' capacities to package L-HDAg. Immunoblot analysis was performed on viral proteins extracted from culture supernatant (Sup) harvested at day 2 after transfection of HuH-7 cells with a mixture of 1 µg of L-HDAg-expressing plasmid DNA and 1 µg of wt or mutant S-HBsAg plasmid DNA. Particles from 1 ml of culture medium were disrupted in Laemmli sample buffer. Proteins were separated on a 15% acrylamide gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-HBsAg antibodies (A) or anti-HDAg antibodies (C). (B) Immunoblot analysis of L-HDAg proteins extracted from cell lysates (Cell) at day 2 posttransfection. Numbers at the bottom of panel C are the percentage of L-HDAg incorporated by wt S-HBsAg, normalized to the same amount of secreted S-HBsAg. Quantitation was performed using the NIH Image software, version 1.63. The unglycosylated and glycosylated S-HBsAg (p24 and gp27, respectively) and L-HDAg ( p27) are indicated. EN, HBV env-negative plasmid.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effects of tryptophan-to-phenylalanine substitutions in the C terminus of the S-HBsAg envelope protein on the mutants' capacities for HDV maturation (A) or interaction with L-HDAg (B). (A) Immunoblot analysis of S-HBsAg proteins extracted from a pool of culture supernatants (Sup) harvested on days 3, 6, and 9 after transfection with a mixture of 1 µg of pSVLD3 plasmid DNA and 1 µg of wt or mutant S plasmid DNA. Particles from 1 ml of supernatant were disrupted in Laemmli sample buffer. Proteins were separated on a 15% acrylamide gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-HBsAg antibodies (1:1,000). Cellular RNA was extracted from HuH-7 cells harvested at day 9 posttransfection. Five micrograms of total RNA was separated on an agarose gel and analyzed for the presence HDV RNA after transfer to nylon membrane and hybridization to a genomic strand-specific 32P-labeled HDV RNA probe (Cell). Particles from 1 ml of culture supernatant (Sup) were analyzed for the presence of genomic HDV RNA as described above. (B) Immunoblot analysis of S-HBsAg proteins extracted from culture supernatant (Sup) harvested 3, 6, and 9 days after transfection of HuH-7 cells with a mixture of 1 µg of L-HDAg-expressing plasmid DNA and 1 µg of wt or mutant S-HBsAg plasmid DNA. Particles from 1 ml of culture medium (Sup) were disrupted in Laemmli sample buffer. Proteins were separated on a 15% acrylamide gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with anti-HBsAg or anti-HDAg antibodies. L-HDAg proteins extracted from cell lysates (Cell) at day 2 posttransfection were analyzed as described above. The unglycosylated and glycosylated S-HBsAg (p24 and gp27, respectively) and L-HDAg ( p27) are indicated. EN, HBV env-negative plasmid.
|
Mutations of tryptophan and proline residues in the L-HDAg carboxyl terminus. With regard to L-HDAg, the carboxyl-terminal 19 residues are likely to constitute a packaging signal and a possible ligand to the S-HBsAg tryptophan-rich domain. This sequence has been described to include a nuclear export signal (NES) (21) and a CXXQ motif (where C is cysteine, Q is glutamine, and X is any amino acid) for farnesylation (10). The farnesyl group covalently bound to Cys-211 is essential but not sufficient for interaction with S-HBsAg (23).
Recently, O'Malley and Lazinski (27) reported that the substitution of Ala for Trp-196 of L-HDAg had no effect on packaging with S-HBsAg, whereas mutation of the proline residues at positions 201 and 205 were detrimental. Although Pro-201 and Pro-205 reside in the predicted NES, it was demonstrated that the lack of packaging with S-HBsAg was not due to a deficient NES in the corresponding mutants. Here we have confirmed these results (Fig. 6) by substituting alanine for proline at positions 201, 204, 205, 208, and 213 and by testing the mutants for packaging with wt S-HBsAg. Only the P213A mutant could be packaged to the wt level, whereas P201A, P205A, P208 and, to a lesser extent, P204A were deficient in S-HBsAg interaction. Experiments conducted on cell lysates and supernatants harvested on days 2 or 6 after transfection generated identical results (data not shown). In addition, by performing a separation of nuclei and cytosol from cells harvested at day 2 posttransfection, we observed that the mutants were detected at wt level in both the nuclear and cytosolic extracts (data not shown). In agreement with the study of O'Malley and Lazinski (27), the substitution of Ala, Phe, Leu, or Val for Trp-196 in L-HDAg had no effect on the mutant's capacity for interaction with S-HBsAg. All Trp-L-HDAg mutants were detected to near-wt levels in the culture medium upon coexpression with wt S-HBsAg (Fig. 6B).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effects of single amino acid substitutions in the C terminus of the L-HDAg protein on the mutants' capacities to copackage with S-HBsAg. (A) Proline-to-alanine substitutions in L-HDAg; (B) tryptophan-196-to-alanine, -phenylalanine, -leucine, or -valine substitutions. HuH-7 cells (8 x 105) were transfected with a mixture of 1 µg of wt S-HBsAg-expressing plasmid DNA and 1 µg of wt S-HDAg, wt L-HDAg, or mutant L-HDAg plasmid DNA. Proteins extracted from cells (Cell) harvested at day 2 after transfection or from 1 ml of culture supernatant (Sup) harvested at day 2 posttransfection were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-HBsAg or anti-HDAg antibodies. The unglycosylated and glycosylated S-HBsAg (p24 and gp27, respectively) and S-HDAg and L-HDAg ( p24 and p27, respectively) are indicated.
|
|
|
|---|
The carboxyl-terminal end (residues 163 to 226) of S-HBsAg is highly hydrophobic and surprisingly rich in tryptophan residues that are strictly conserved among all orthohepadnaviruses. In contrast, only two tryptophan residues, at positions equivalent to W163 and W196 of S-HBsAg, are found in S-DHBsAg, the small envelope protein of the Duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) (26). Orthohepadnaviruses such as Woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) and Woolly monkey hepatitis B virus (WMHBV) can assist HDV propagation because their small envelope proteins (S-WHsAg and S-WMHBsAg, respectively) are competent for HDV RNP envelopment (1, 32, 34). In contrast, the envelope protein of the Avihepadnavirus DHBV is unable to package the HDV RNP (26). Compared to S-HBsAg or S-WHsAg, the S-DHBsAg polypeptide appears to lack the carboxyl-terminal Trp-rich domain and the region corresponding to the AGL between TMD-II and TMD-III (Fig. 2). When the AGL was experimentally deleted on S-HBsAg, it led to a drastic reduction in the capacity of the mutant for HDV maturation (26). However, this mutant was still competent for the envelopment of the singly expressed L-HDAg protein, demonstrating the absence of an L-HDAg interaction determinant in the AGL.
The S-HBsAg carboxyl terminus is predicted to contain two TMDs (TMD-III and TMD-IV) located at positions 173 to 193 and 202 to 222, respectively (30). The Trp-196-201 cluster identified here as crucial for HDV maturation belongs to a short sequence (residues 194 to 201) that is predicted to make the junction between TMD-III and TMD-IV (Fig. 2). According to the topological model of Persson and Argos (30), it is oriented toward the cytosolic side of the ER membrane, a position potentially adequate for interaction with L-HDAg and the RNP. However, a different topological model obtained by epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies raised against HBV particles places the 187-207 region at the viral particle surface (7, 29). As previously discussed, the discrepancy between the two hypotheses might indicate that two topologies of the S-HBsAg carboxyl terminus coexist in the viral envelope.
The fact that Trp-196, -199, and -201 are conserved among all orthohepadnaviruses, and yet dispensable for SVP secretion, might indicate that their contribution, if any, to the HBV life cycle resides in the virion assembly process or at viral entry. However, the conservation might also result from the presence of essential domains in the HBV polymerase encoded by the S-HBsAg DNA sequence in the 1 reading frame (38). Interestingly, the Trp-196 codon is included in the DNA sequence that encodes the YMDD motif of the polymerase catalytic domain (Fig. 7). This motif is crucial for the activity of the enzyme, and only in lamivudine-resistant virus is YMDD converted to YVDD, YSDD, or YIDD (25, 38-40). The latter mutation creates a W196S substitution in S-HBsAg which is detrimental to HDV assembly (41). As shown in the present study, this deficiency is due to a loss of the mutant's ability to interact with L-HDAg. Hence, one would assume that in vivo the YIDD mutation confers resistance to HDV superinfection.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG.7. Sequence of the overlapping HBV polymerase and S-HBsAg genes. (A) Nucleic acid sequence coding for the 537-544 domain of wt HBV polymerase (wt-pol) and the overlapping 194-201 carboxyl-terminus domain of wt S-HBsAg (wt-env). (B) Nucleic acid sequence coding for a YIDD motif of lamivudine-resistant HBV polymerase and the overlapping 194-201 carboxyl-terminal domain of the corresponding S-HBsAg. (C) Alternative coding sequences for the YMDD catalytic domain of wt HBV polymerase and the corresponding sequences of S-HBsAg. Note that, in order to maintain the YMDD catalytic motif of wt HBV polymerase, there is no alternative to a tryptophan residue at position 196 in S-HBsAg, Ile or Thr at position 195, Met or Thr at position 197, or Met, Thr, or Ile at position 198.
|
With regard to L-HDAg, the results of several independent studies have led to the notion that the 19 carboxyl-terminal residues, which make the difference between the L-HDAg and S-HDAg sequences, are likely to constitute a packaging signal: (i) deletions have been performed between amino acids 2 and 195 without preventing packaging with S-HBsAg (4, 5), (ii) the appending of the L-HDAg residues 196 to 214 to the carboxyl terminus of c-H-Ras (22) allowed the cosecretion of the latter with SVPs (Ras is similar in size to L-HDAg and naturally farnesylated at its carboxyl terminus, but it cannot be packaged as such by S-HBsAg), and (iii) a farnesylated S-HDAg could not be assembled with S-HBsAg, indicating that the farnesyl group, per se, is not the packaging signal (23). Surprisingly, the 19 carboxyl-terminal residues of L-HDAg are not very conserved across the different HDV genotypes, except for the CXXQ box, a tryptophan residue at position 196, and at least five proline residues diversely distributed (33). As shown here and in a previous study (17), mutation of L-HDAg Trp-196 has no effect on packaging, whereas mutation of Pro-201, -204, -205, or -208 is detrimental (27). Although the latter residues are elements of the L-HDAg NES, it was demonstrated that the lack of packaging with S-HBsAg was not due to a deficient NES in the corresponding mutants but, clearly, to a defect in S-HBsAg interaction (25).
Whether L-HDAg binds directly or not to S-HBsAg is still questionable. In favor of direct binding are the experiments conducted by Hwang and Lai (13) using a far Western blotting assay. The present study also supports this hypothesis, because it identifies a tryptophan-rich domain as the S-HBsAg determinant, and it confirms the results of O'Malley and Lazinski (27), which designated the carboxyl-terminal proline-rich domain of L-HDAg as a potential ligand. Physical interaction mediated by tryptophan-rich and proline-rich motifs is a well-documented phenomenon that governs many protein-protein interactions (18, 35), but additional elements have to be considered for understanding the binding potential of the Trp-196-201 cluster. First, statistical studies of sequence databases and crystal structures of integral membrane proteins show a preferential clustering of tryptophan residues at the membrane interface (14). It is thought to stabilize the transmembrane helix (20) and to result from the amphipathic nature of tryptophan that allows both hydrophobic and polar interactions (43). Second, according to Ma et al. (24), conservation on a protein surface of Trp or, to a lesser extent, Phe and Met indicates the likelihood of their participation to a binding site. In addition, the fact that Trp-to-Phe mutations abolish interaction with L-HDAg suggests that the Trp-rich motif belongs to, or constitutes, the L-HDAg binding site. Indeed, by replacing an indole ring with a phenyl ring, a Trp-to-Phe mutation is unlikely to affect a distal binding site because it should not create a large cavity in place of Trp in the polypeptide chain.
Obviously, additional experiments need to be conducted to better understand the L-HDAg-S-HBsAg interaction. Future investigations in our laboratory will determine whether the appending of the Trp-rich domain of S-HBsAg to a heterologous protein is sufficient to mediate its binding to purified L-HDAg. It would also be interesting to investigate the function of the Trp-rich domain in the HBV life cycle.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»