Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, April 2005, p. 4519-4526, Vol. 79, No. 7
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.7.4519-4526.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Mar Perez, and
Juan Carlos de la Torre*
Department of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
Received 11 August 2004/ Accepted 22 November 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effects of IGR on MG RNA expression.
We have previously described a MG construct consisting of the 5' and 3' UTRs and the IGR of the LCMV Armstrong S segment that expresses the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene substituting for the NP ORF (MG/S-CAT; 15, 25). For the present study, we have generated an ambisense MG expressing an additional green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene replacing the GP ORF (MG/S-CAT/GFP) (Fig. 1A). We also constructed MG/S-CAT
IGR and MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR by deleting the IGR in the two previous constructs, respectively (Fig. 1A). We used Northern blot analysis to determine levels of MG RNA and derived RNA species in transfected cells. Pol-I-mediated intracellular synthesis of MG RNA in the absence of the viral transacting factor L was unimpaired in constructs lacking an IGR (Fig. 1B, lane 4 versus lane 2 and lane 8 versus lane 6). Consistent with our previous findings (25), MG amplification was, however, strictly L dependent. This process was unimpaired in MGs lacking an IGR (Fig. 1B; lane 1 versus lane 2, lane 3 versus lane 4, lane 5 versus lane 6, and lane 7 versus lane 8). Likewise, anti-MG (aMG) RNA, the full-length replicative intermediate, was found in similar amounts in the presence or absence of an IGR (Fig. 1C, lane 3 versus lane 1 and lane 7 versus lane 5). Notably, subgenomic CAT mRNA was detected only in cells expressing either MG/S-CAT or MG/S-CAT/GFP and not in cells expressing the corresponding constructs lacking an IGR (Fig. 1C, lanes 1 and 5 versus lanes 3 and 7). Northern blot analysis has only limited resolution power for analysis of RNA species of similar sizes, which might have jeopardized the detection of MG/S-CAT
IGR-derived subgenomic CAT mRNA terminated at the 3'-end of the CAT ORF. Such an argument does not, however, apply to the MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR construct, thus confirming that transcription termination by the virus polymerase was critically dependent on the IGR. Besides the absence of a CAT mRNA band, we noticed a smear extending from below aMG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR (Fig. 1C, lane 7 and data not shown), suggesting that a small fraction of the transcriptase complexes on IGR-deficient templates might have terminated prematurely. The lack of a distinct pattern and a very weak hybridization signal indicated, however, that low processivity rather than bona fide transcription termination was the underlying mechanism.
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effects of the IGR on MG RNA expression. (A) pMG/S-CAT (previously referred to as pMG-ARM/S) (25) contains the MG/S-CAT construct flanked by the murine Pol-I promoter (Pol-Ip) and Pol-I terminator (Pol-It). Transcription of pMG/S-CAT by the cellular Pol-I (primary transcription) generates MG/S-CAT RNA with a 5' UTR containing a nontemplated G residue (*) (29) and a 3' UTR containing the precise viral 3' end (see also Fig. 5). Constructs pMG/S-CAT IGR, pMG/S-CAT/GFP, and pMG/S-CAT/GFP IGR contain the indicated RNA analogues, flanked also by the murine Pol-Ip and Pol-It. Inverted writing indicates antisense polarity with respect to Pol-Ip. Gr and Nr, sequences derived from residual GP (90 nucleotides [nt]) and NP ORF (55 nt), respectively; L1 to L4, linker sequences for cloning purposes (6 to 13 nt in length). Lines with arrows at both ends indicate the lengths of primary Pol-I transcripts (solid lines) or ofsubgenomic mRNA transcripts formed by the LCMV RdRp (dashed lines; in approximation) (20), where applicable. (B to D) BHK-21 cells in six-well plates (80% confluent) were transfected with the indicated MG expression vectors (0.5 µg) together with pC-NP (0.8 µg), pC-GP (0.4 µg), and pC-Z (0.1 µg) by using Lipofectamine as described previously (6). pC-L (1 µg) was added to the transfection mix where indicated. Sixty hours later, total cellular RNA was prepared as described previously (6). Duplicate Northern blots were hybridized to CAT sense (B) and CAT antisense (C) riboprobes. Ethidium bromide staining of 28S rRNA showed comparable total RNA amounts loaded for each sample (D). Narrow solid arrows, MG polarity full-length RNA; wide solid arrows, anti-MG polarity full-length RNA; double-headed arrows, putative MG homodimers as previously described (14); triple-headed arrows, CAT mRNA of subgenomic length. Samples originate from the same experiment as that shown in Fig. 2A and B and 4A and B.
|
IGR and MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR) (Fig. 1A) also expressed CAT and GFP, respectively, but quantitative analysis of CAT activity by phosphorimager revealed reduced expression levels in the absence of an IGR that were in the fivefold range for each respective construct (Fig. 2A, lane 3 versus lane 1 and lane 7 versus lane 5). These reductions were independent of GP and Z polypeptides (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Impact of the IGR on MG reporter gene expression. BHK-21 cells in six-well plates (80% confluent) were transfected with the indicated MG expression vectors (0.5 µg) together with pC-NP (0.8 µg), pC-GP (0.4 µg), and pC-Z (0.1 µg) by using Lipofectamine as described previously (6). pC-L (1 µg) was added to the transfection mix where indicated. The chart in panel A is representative of the correspondingly numbered samples in panel B. Sixty hours later, the cultures were monitored for GFP expression by fluorescence microscopy (panel B, samples 5 to 8 only) and cell extracts were processed for the CAT assay (A) as described previously (6). O, origin of sample application; NAc, nonacetylated chloramphenicol; MAc, monoacetylated chloramphenicol. The samples originate from the same experiment as that shown in Fig. 1B to D and 4A and B.
|
IGR complementary sequence with a 5' end modified by only two G residues derived from the minimal T7 promoter sequence. Upon self-processing of the hepatitis delta ribozyme (pT7-aMGdrz) (24) or of a sequence-adapted hairpin ribozyme (pT7-aMGhrz) (14), respectively, a 3' end identical to MG/S-CAT/GFP (pT7-aMGhrz) or extended by only a single C residue (pT7-aMGdrz) is generated. This T7 transcript coding for CAT in sense polarity should have yielded CAT activity if the flanking LCMV noncoding regions had, unexpectedly, allowed for efficient translation independent of 5'- and 3'-terminal modifications of the RNA. We compared aMG RNA levels and derived CAT activity obtained from pT7-aMGhrz and pT7-aMGdrz transcripts with the corresponding values for CAT sense RNA synthesized by the LCMV polymerase by using MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR as template (Fig. 3B to E; Table 1). Because self-processing of the ribozyme in the T7 transcripts was incomplete, we considered the possibility that either the processed RNA species alone, the unprocessed RNA species alone, or both RNA species served as templates for CAT translation, and we calculated the respective relative translation efficiency as arbitrary units of CAT activity per arbitrary amount of aMG RNA (Table 1). Even under the assumption that only processed aMG RNA derived from pT7-aMGdrz or pT7-aMGhrz was translated, the CAT activity per RNA molecule was approximately 100-fold below the translational activity of aMG RNA produced by the LCMV polymerase with MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR as template (Table 1). This large difference in translational efficiency was most likely an underestimation considering that (i) translation was unlikely to have discriminated between processed and unprocessed T7 transcripts and that (ii) a fraction of the aMG RNA band produced by the LCMV polymerase corresponds to encapsidated replicative RNA species that are not substrate for the translational machinery of the cell. This finding supported our hypothesis that the LCMV polymerase used the MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR template for a transcription-like process to generate CAT sense molecules of full antigenomic length that carried modifications for efficient translation, putatively a 5' cap structure. We cannot formally rule out the possibility that the small amount of heterogeneous CAT sense RNA molecules (corresponding to a weak smear of subgenomic aMG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR RNA in Fig. 1C, lane 7) made a minor contribution to the CAT activity generated from MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR (Fig. 2A).
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Inefficient CAT translation from T7-derived full-length anti-MG RNA. (A) Construct pT7-aMGhrz expresses an antisense transcript of MG/S-CAT/GFP IGR under control of the T7 RNA polymerase promoter (T7p) and followed downstream by a sequence-adapted hairpin ribozyme (hrz) to generate the precise viral 3' end and the T7 RNA polymerase terminator (T7T). Construct pT7-aMGdrz contains the hepatitis delta ribozyme (drz) instead of the hairpin ribozyme in pT7-aMGhrz. The drz-based construct contains an extra 3' C residue (*) for efficient self-cleavage of drz (24). Inverted writing indicates antisense polarity with respect to T7p. L2 and L3, linker sequences for cloning purposes (6 to 13 nt in length); lines with arrows at both ends indicate the lengths of processed T7 transcripts. (B to E) BHK-21 cells in six-well plates (80% confluent) were transfected with the indicated amounts of pC-L, pC-NP (0.8 µg), pMG/S-CAT/GFP IGR (0.5 µg), pT7-MGhrz (0.5 µg), pT7-MGdrz (0.5 µg), andpC-T7 (1 µg) as indicated in the chart by using Lipofectamine as described previously (6). Sixty hours later, cell extracts were processed for the CAT assay (E) as previously described (6), and total cellular RNA from each sample was probed by Northern hybridization with a CAT antisense riboprobe (C and D) and exposed for 8 (C) or 40 (D) min, to detect and discriminate the individual bands in each lane. Ethidium bromide staining of 28S rRNA showed comparable total RNA amounts loaded for each sample (B). O, origin of sample application; NAc, nonacetylated chloramphenicol; MAc, monoacetylated chloramphenicol; *, unprocessed T7 transcript (lanes 4 and 5); **, T7 transcript upon self-processing of the respective ribozyme (lanes 4 and 5) or anti-MG RNA plus putative full-length antigenomic CAT mRNA-like transcript (lanes 2 and 3).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Relative translation efficiency of IGR-deficient CAT sense aMG transcripts derived from either the LCMV RdRp or T7 RNA polymerasea
|
IGR and MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR was dramatically reduced compared to that by MG/S-CAT and MG/S-CAT/GFP, respectively (Fig. 4A, lane 1 versus lane 3 and lane 5 versus lane 7). We detected only very low, though specific, CAT activity in passage cultures of IGR-deficient MGs when CAT reactions were tuned for the highest sensitivity. However, detailed quantitative analysis revealed approximately 100-fold less efficient reporter gene passage by an IGR-deficient MG (data not shown). Similarly, GFP expression was widespread in passage cultures of MG/S-CAT/GFP but practically absent in passages from cells transfected with MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR (Fig. 4B, sample 5 versus sample 7). In some experiments, a small number of isolated GFP-positive cells could be detected very early (approximately 20 h) after passage of MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR culture supernatants (Fig. 4B, sample 7, single cell in passage culture). These cells disappeared, however, while GFP expression in MG/S-CAT/GFP passage cultures spread to form large foci at 48 to 72 h after transfer (data not shown). Similarly inefficient passage of reporter gene activity was observed when LCMV was added directly to the transfection culture (15) to allow passage of IGR-deficient MGs via reassortment (reference 15 and data not shown).
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effects of the IGR on VLP formation (A and B) BHK-21 cells in six-well plates (80% confluent) were transfected with MG expression vectors (0.5 µg) together with pC-NP (0.8 µg), pC-GP (0.4 µg) and pC-Z (0.1 µg) by using Lipofectamine as described previously (6). pC-L (1 µg) was added to the transfection mix where indicated. The chart in panel A is representative of the correspondingly numbered samples in panel B. O, origin of sample application; NAc, nonacetylated chloramphenicol; MAc, monoacetylated chloramphenicol. Sixty hours later, the cultures supernatants (400 µl [each] of the 2-ml total) were passaged onto fresh BHK-21 cell monolayers for 2 h prior to superinfection of the cultures with LCMV Armstrong at a multiplicity of infection of 2. Twenty-four h after passage, the cultures were monitored for GFP expression by fluorescence microscopy (panel B,samples 5 to 8 only). Seventy-two hours after passage, cell extracts prepared from the passage culture wells were processed for CAT assay (A). Samples originate from the same experiment as that shown in Fig. 1B to D and 2A and B. (C) Constructs pT7-MG/S-CAT/GFP and pT7-MG/S-CAT/GFP IGR express the respective MG under control of a modified T7 promoter (T7p 2G) (23), followed downstream by the hepatitis delta ribozyme (drz) to generate the precise viral 3' end, and the T7 RNA polymerase terminator (T7T). An extra 3' C residue (*) upstream of drz allows for efficient self-cleavage (24). Inverted writing indicates antisense polarity with respect to T7p. IGR, intergenic region; Nr, residual NP ORF-derived sequence (55 nt); L1 to L3, linker sequences for cloning purposes (6 to 13 nt in length). Lines with arrows at both ends indicate the lengths of primary Pol-I transcripts (solid lines) or of subgenomic mRNA transcripts formed by the LCMV RdRp (dashed lines; in approximation) (20) where applicable (compare Fig. 1C). (D) 293T cells in six-well plates (80% confluent) were transfected with pC-L (1 µg), pC-NP (0.8 µg), and pC-T7 (1 µg) by using Lipofectamine as described previously (6). pT7-MG/S-CAT/GFP (0.5 µg), pT7-MG/S-CAT/GFP IGR (0.5 µg), pC-GP (0.4 µg), and pC-Z (0.1 µg) were added to the transfection mixture as indicated in the chart. Seventy hours later, VLPs in the SN were purified by ultracentrifugation, and MG RNA was extracted and detected by RT-PCR as previously described (23). PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis and were detected by ethidium bromide staining. The arrows indicate the expected 280-bp CAT PCR product (CAT).
|
IGR encoding the respective MG under control of a modified T7 promoter (24), followed downstream by a hepatitis delta ribozyme and the T7 terminator (Fig. 4C) (15). Autocatalytic cleavage of the ribozyme in the primary transcript generates the respective MG active in transcription and replication (14, 15). Cotransfection of pT7-MG/S-CAT/GFP or pT7-MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR together with pC-T7, pC-L, pC-NP, pC-GP, and pC-Z resulted in a pattern of CAT activity in transfection and passage cultures (data not shown) that recreated those found with the corresponding Pol-I constructs (Fig. 2A and B and 4A and B). We purified VLPs from the SN of transfected cells by ultracentrifugation, and MG RNA in VLPs was measured by semiquantitative reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (Fig. 4D). MG RNA was recovered from both MG-CAT/GFP and MG-CAT/GFP
IGR. In both cases, detection of cell-free MG RNA resulted from a specific viral budding process, as demonstrated by its dependence on GP and Z (Fig. 4D, lane 1 versus lane 2 and lane 3 versus lane 4). The signal obtained from MG-CAT/GFP
IGR was, however, reduced (about fivefold) compared to MG-CAT/GFP, indicating impaired budding activity of the IGR-deficient MG. Based on the present data, we propose a mechanism for transcription termination and replication of LCMV as outlined in Fig. 5. Consistent with our previous findings (25) and as proposed for other NS RNA viruses (9, 27), the LCMV polymerase may exist in two distinct functional complexes, namely, as transcriptase or as replicase. The transcriptase initiates RNA synthesis by using a cap-oligonucleotide primer (20), while the replicase starts by a prime-and-realign mechanism (29). Only transcriptase complexes terminate within the IGR sequence, probably via a structure-dependent mechanism that operates mainly in the transcript rather than the template (35). Replicase complexes may be intrinsically resistant to structure-dependent termination, or the termination signal may be attenuated in the context of encapsidated and uncapped (17) replicate RNA but not of capped (20) transcripts. On IGR-deficient MG templates, transcriptase complexes proceed to the very end of the template due to the lack of an appropriate termination signal. These transcripts have 3' ends identical to those of the replicate but carry 5' nontemplated bases and a cap structure of host origin like bona fide transcripts. The fivefold reduction in CAT activity observed in this context could likely be due to an influence of 3' IGR sequences on translation efficiency, although alternative explanations could equally be envisaged. In any case, IGR-mediated transcription termination enhances apparently viral gene expression.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Schematic for postulated MG transcription and replication on IGR-competent and -deficient MG templates. (A) The MG template is synthesized intracellularly via nuclear Pol-I-mediated primary transcription (arrow with double lines) and exported to the cytoplasm via unknown mechanisms. Upon encapsidation by NP, distinct transcriptase (arrows with dashed lines) and replicase complexes (solid arrow) of the LCMV RdRp synthesize full-length replicate and subgenomic mRNA. Thereby, replication introduces a 5' nontemplated G residue (29) that is lost in the subsequent replication step. Transcription initiation with a host-derived primer results in the introduction of a 5' cap structure and of a variable number of nontemplated nucleotides (20). Transcriptase complexes terminate upon synthesis of the IGR sequence via structure-dependent termination (20, 33). (B) IGR-deficient MG templates are subject to identical processes, but transcriptase complexes proceed to the 5' end of the MG or aMG template. Due to a 5' cap structure, the so-produced molecules are efficiently translated, but they are unlikely to serve as templates for further RNA synthesis as their cap structure is supposed to interfere with encapsidation.
|
IGR and MG/S-CAT/GFP
IGR was unexpected and raises the question of whether the IGR contains an encapsidation or packaging signal. Considering the fact that the LCMV polymerase recognizes only templates encapsidated by NP (14), efficient amplification of IGR-deficient MGs argued against a critical role of the IGR in encapsidation. This does not, however, rule out specific interactions of the LCMV NP with the IGR as reported for Junin virus (33). The IGR stem-loop parallels strong secondary RNA structures that serve as packaging signals in various viral families ranging from retroviruses to unenveloped icosahedral plant viruses (13, 19, 28, 34). Further, zinc binding domains found in almost all retroviral Gag proteins (2) are known to interact specifically with certain stem-loops in retroviral psi elements (1, 8) and thereby to recruit viral genomes into infectious particles (11). It therefore seems reasonable to speculate that the arenavirus Z protein may, in addition to its role in budding (23), contribute to virus assembly (23) at least in part via interaction with the IGR stem-loop, thereby recruiting LCMV genomes into particles. Our semiquantitative RT-PCR data showing reduced budding activity of IGR-deficient MGs would support this notion. Residual budding activity and reporter gene passage in the absence of an IGR indicate, however, that additional cis-acting sequence signals may also contribute to this process. At first sight, the modestly reduced budding of the IGR-deficient MG seems insufficient to fully explain the >100-fold reduction in GFP and CAT activity upon passage. But the formation of large GFP-positive foci by MG/S-CAT/GFP suggested that reporter gene activity in passage culture wells reflected the integral of multiple rounds of MG propagation. Thereby, even a modestly reduced propagation of IGR-deficient MGs may account for strongly reduced CAT activity upon multiple rounds of spreading. A modest impairment in budding could have an even more dramatic impact on the propagation of infectious LCMV in vivo. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility that reduced infectivity of IGR-deficient particles may have contributed to our experimental findings. Similar observations have been made with human immunodeficiency virus genomes exhibiting mutations in the stem-loop of the dimer initiation site that is contained within the psi element (4, 12, 22). Whether the IGR contains a putative S/L segment dimerization site and how this site may relate to arenavirus packaging and infectivity remains to be elucidated. A better understanding of these functions may provide the basis for the rational design of engineered infectious arenaviruses (26) with reduced propagation capacity as candidate live attenuated vaccines against arenaviral hemorrhagic fevers.
We thank Phi Lam for excellent technical assistance.
Present address: Institute of Experimental Immunology, Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Zurich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»