Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, March 2005, p. 3127-3138, Vol. 79, No. 5
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.5.3127-3138.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina2
Received 28 June 2004/ Accepted 29 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast, RRV infection of rhesus fibroblasts (RhFs) yields high titers of virus (
106 PFU/ml), which greatly facilitates the analysis of the RRV lytic life cycle and the construction of recombinant viruses. In addition, naive rhesus macaques can be experimentally infected with RRV (40, 61). Our laboratory previously demonstrated that the kinetics of RRV gene expression during de novo infection of RhFs closely resembles that of KSHV reactivation (14). We identified the expression of the RRV Orf50, R8, and R8.1 spliced transcripts during lytic replication (14) and characterized the transcriptional function of the RRV Orf50 protein (12, 14). Further, we also reported the construction of an RRV-green fluorescent protein (GFP) recombinant virus and assays to measure viral replication (15). Other macaque rhadinoviruses (reviewed in reference 11) have been discovered by amplifying short stretches of the DNA polymerase gene (54).
One of the most intensely studied KSHV proteins is the latency-associated nuclear antigen (LANA) (reviewed in reference 31). KSHV LANA functions in a mechanical capacity during viral latency (4), tethering the viral episome to the host chromosome and thus ensuring its segregation during mitosis (9, 10, 23, 24, 26). A number of other proteins involved in this bridging process have since been identified (32). Further, KSHV LANA has been shown to play many different roles within the latently infected cell. KSHV LANA can promote cell survival and prevent apoptosis by interacting with the tumor suppressor protein p53 (21). LANA can also regulate the Rb-E2F pathway and cooperate with h-Ras to promote cellular transformation (46) and has been shown to stimulate S-phase entry by stabilizing beta-catenin through a novel mechanism involving the cell cycle-dependent nuclear accumulation of its inhibitor, glycogen synthase kinase 3ß (22). Further, KSHV LANA can interact with the RING3 protein, an interaction which results in its own phosphorylation (41, 45). An important function of LANA is its role as a transcriptional modulator. LANA can activate both viral and cellular promoters, including the LANA promoter itself (28); E2F-responsive promoters; and the interleukin-6 (2), c-JUN (3), and human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoters (30). LANA has also been shown to function as a repressor of transcription (55), acting at least partially though the mSIN3 complex (33).
While KSHV LANA has been the subject of intense research, the properties of RRV LANA (R-LANA) have not been investigated thus far. At the amino acid level, R-LANA shows a significant degree of homology to KSHV LANA. However, this homology is limited to the N- and C-terminal ends of the protein. R-LANA is 448 amino acids in length, while the size of KSHV LANA ranges from 1,089 to 1,162 amino acids, due to the variable-length internal acidic repeat domain, a region that is completely absent from R-LANA. We have previously demonstrated that R-LANA is transcribed during RRV lytic replication (14), while KSHV LANA mRNA has been reported to be either marginally upregulated (27, 43) or uninduced (20, 59) upon reactivation of latently infected cell lines. Our prior observation regarding R-LANA transcription during RRV lytic replication prompted us to determine the role of R-LANA in the RRV life cycle.
Here, we describe the initial characterization of R-LANA. We have mapped the transcription start site using 5' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), as well as the subcellular localization, self-association, and transcriptional properties of the R-LANA protein itself. We have found that expression of R-LANA during lytic infection results in an inhibition of RRV replication. Further, we demonstrate that the mechanism of this inhibition is through R-LANA-mediated inhibition of the transactivation function of the RRV Orf50/Rta protein. R-LANA's ability to repress the RRV lytic cycle may help downregulate the transcription of early genes at late times during lytic replication and may also help to maintain the latent state of the viral life cycle by suppressing viral reactivation.
|
|
|---|
Establishment of BJAB-RRV-GFP and 293-RRV-GFP cells. BJAB or 293 cells were infected with RRV-GFP at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of >1 in the presence of 4 µg of Polybrene (Sigma; 52495)/ml for 1 h. The virus inoculum was removed, and cells were resuspended in appropriate complete media plus 500 µM ganciclovir (GCV). BJAB cells were subjected to flow cytometry. Briefly, the RRV-GFP-infected BJAB cells were sorted on a modular flow cytometer (Cytomation Inc.) based on GFP expression. The top 5% of the most highly fluorescing cells were collected and passaged in tissue culture to establish the BJAB-RRV-GFP latent cell line. After sorting, both BJAB-RRV-GFP and 293-RRV-GFP cells were passaged for 4 weeks in GCV. After 4 weeks, GCV was removed from the media, and cells were then passaged in regular complete media.
Plasmids. R-LANA was amplified by PCR from RRV H26-95 viral DNA (1) with primers complementary to the genomic open reading frame. The resulting PCR product was cloned into the Spe1 and EcoR1 sites of pEF1-myc-HisA (Invitrogen). The 5' primers included either an AU1 (Covance) or FLAG (Sigma) epitope sequence. Red fluorescent R-LANA fusion constructs were created by cloning the R-LANA coding sequence into the pdsRed-N1 vector (Clontech) at BamH1 and Xho1 sites with primers 1 (5'-CTCGAGATGTGGGGCAGCCGGCAACAT-3') and 2 (5'-GGATCCCCGTGCTGAATTGGCAGTCCTCTG-3'). R-LANA was fused to the N terminus of red fluorescent protein (RFP). R-LANA1-25-RFP was made with primers 1 and 3 (5'-GGATCCCCTCCGCAATGTCCCCTGCAGGAACT-3'). R-LANA297-448-RFP was made with primers 4 (5'-CTCGAGATGGAGGAGCGGCAGCAGCAACCG-3') and 2. R-LANA46-448-RFP was made with primers 5 (5'-CTCGAGATGGCCAGCCTGCCTGCACCCC-3') and 2. The fibrillarin-GFP plasmid was kindly proved by M. Olson (19). The pcDNA3-RRV Orf50 expression plasmid has been described previously (14).
5' and 3' RACE. mRNA was harvested from RRV-infected RhFs at 72 h postinfection or from unstimulated 293-RRV latent cultures with the RNEasy kit (QIAGEN) and was subsequently treated with RQ-DNase (Promega). cDNA was reverse transcribed with the Smart RACE system (Clontech, BD), and R-LANA-specific messages were amplified with the following primers: 5'-CGATACTATGCCGGAACGATGTTG-3' (5' RACE) and 5'-GCCGGACGCACCTGGCAGTCCCGTCAT-3' (3' RACE). PCR products were cloned into pCR2.1-Topo (Invitrogen) and sequenced.
RT-PCR and Northern hybridization. Total RNA was harvested from 293-RRV-GFP cells with the RNEasy kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For Northern hybridization, 4 µg of total RNA was added per lane and hybridization was performed by a previously described protocol (14). An R-LANA DNA probe was made with RRV 26-95 (nucleotides [nt] 118646 to 119992) viral DNA. RNA used for reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was treated with RQ-DNase1 (Promega) and reverse transcribed with the Promega reverse transcription system. PCR was performed with Platinum Pfx polymerase (Invitrogen) with an annealing temperature of 58°C and the following primers: Orf71, 5'-CAACCAGTCACCCACCTTTT-3' and 5'-TGCAGCAGGTCACTTAAAACC-3'; Orf72, 5'-CCAGGTGGTGGAGTCTGTTC-3' and 5'-GCACCGAGGCTAAACAGC-3'; Orf73, 5'-TCACGGTGTTCTGTCAAAGC-3' and 5'-CTATGCTGGCCTGGAAGTG-3'.
Coimmunoprecipitations and Western blots. 293 cells on 10-cm dishes were transfected with Superfect reagent (QIAGEN) with either 10 µg of DNA for each construct (for coimmunoprecipitations) or 15 µg of DNA for a single construct. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, the cells were harvested with radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (14) for Western blots or NP-40 lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 0.1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0]) for immunoprecipitations. Antibodies used for immunoprecipitations and Western blots included monoclonal anti-AU1 (Covance; MMS-130R), anti-AU1-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Bethyl; A190-124P), monoclonal anti-FLAG (Sigma; A-8592), FLAG-HRP (Sigma; F-3040), monoclonal anti-GFP (Clontech; 8362-1), and peptide GFP-HRP (Clontech; 8369-1). The secondary antibody used for detection of R-LANA-GFP was sheep anti-mouse antibody conjugated to HRP (Cappel/ICN; 55569). For coimmunoprecipitations, lysates were precleared with protein A/G beads (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; A0704) and incubated with a primary monoclonal antibody for 4 h at 4°C. Protein A/G beads were then added for 4 h at 4°C. Complexes were centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 6 min and washed three times with NP-40 lysis buffer prior to denaturation in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) loading buffer at 70°C for 5 min.
In vitro dephosphorylation assay. 293 cells in three 10-cm dishes were transfected with pEF-R-LANAFLAG. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were harvested and lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer. Immunoprecipitations were performed as described above with the monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. After three washes with NP-40 lysis buffer, agarose beads were resuspended in 100 µl of New England Biolabs no. 3 buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-Cl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol [pH 7.9]). The resuspended beads were divided equally into two fractions. Three microliters of calf intestine phosphatase (CIP) (NEB; M0290S) was added to one fraction and 3 µl of phosphate-buffered saline was added to the other. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Beads were pelleted by centrifugation and washed once with NP-40. Bound proteins were eluted in SDS-PAGE lysis buffer and subjected to Western blotting as described above.
Cellular localization assay. LANA-RFP fusion proteins were transfected into RhF cells by electroporation (250 V, 500 µF), and cells were allowed to recover for 48 h. Cells were fixed on tissue culture chamber slides and treated with DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) nuclear stain. Cells were visualized on a fluorescence microscope, and images were captured with the OpenLab software suite.
Viral infections. Equivalent numbers of RhFs were transfected with pEF-R-LANAFLAG or pEF expression plasmids by using the Amaxa Nucleofection system as described by the manufacturer (program U-23). Following transfection, cells were recovered in complete media for 24 h. RRV-GFP recombinant virus (15) was used to infect the transfected RhFs at an MOI greater than 1. Cell-free supernatants were harvested 72 h postinfection, and viral titer was determined by a plaque assay as previously described (15).
Viral genome immunoprecipitation assay. 293-RRV-GFP cells in 10-cm culture dishes were transfected with 15 µg of either pEF-R-LANAFLAG, pEF, pdsRed-N1 (encoding RFP), or p-R-LANA-RFP and recovered in complete media for 72 h. Protein-DNA complexes were cross-linked with 270 µl of 37% formaldehyde, and cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline. Lysis was performed with 400 µl of an SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.1]) and one freeze-thaw cycle. Lysates were diluted with 1 ml of chromatin immunoprecipitation dilution buffer (0.1% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.1], 167 mM NaCl), and 10 µl of antibody was added as follows: 10 µl of the FLAG monoclonal antibody (Sigma; F-3040) was added to the pEF- and pEF-R-LANA-transfected cell lysates, and 10 µl of the dsRed monoclonal antibody (Clontech, BD; 632392) was added to the dsRed-N1 and R-LANA-RFP lysates. Immunoprecipitation was performed on a nutator for 16 h at 4°C. Sixty microliters of a 50% (wt/vol) solution of protein A/G-agarose beads was added to each sample, along with 400 µg of sonicated salmon sperm DNA/ml. Samples were incubated for 2 h on a nutator at 4°C. Agarose beads were centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 2 min and washed with each of the following buffers for 5 min: (i) low-salt buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% Triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.1], 150 mM NaCl), (ii) high-salt buffer (same as low-salt buffer but with 500 mm NaCl), (iii) LiCl buffer (0.25 M LiCl, 1% NP-40, 1% deoxycholate, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.1]), and (iv) TE (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]) (two washes). Cross-links were reversed by addition of 20 µl of 5 M NaCl and incubation at 65°C for 4 h. DNA-protein complexes were then eluted from agarose beads with two 250-µl elution volumes of a 1% SDS-0.1 M NaHCO3 solution. Eluates were analyzed for RRV genome content by either Southern hybridization with a GFP-specific probe or real-time quantitative PCR (QPCR), as previously described (15).
Luciferase reporter assays. 293 cells (105) were plated in each well of a 24-well plate. Twenty-four hours later (50 to 70% confluence) cells were transfected with Superfect reagent (QIAGEN), with a total of 5.5 µg of DNA per well (0.5 µg of luciferase-promoter reporter plasmid and 2.5 µg of each effector plasmid, i.e., pRF-R-LANA and pcDNA3-Orf50). The total amount of effector plasmid DNA transfected was always kept constant by normalizing with vector plasmid pEF or pcDNA3. Each transfection was performed in triplicate, and data shown are representative of at least three separate experiments. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were lysed on the plate with the MPER reagent (Pierce) and analyzed for luciferase content as previously described (14). Where applicable, trichostatin A (TSA) (Sigma; T-8552) was added 18 h prior to harvest at 100 nM. An equivalent volume of ethanol was added to control samples.
Viral reactivation. BJAB-RRV and 293-RRV cells were treated with TPA (25 ng/ml), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), TSA (Sigma; T-8552; 100 nM), or ethanol. Seventy-two hours posttreatment, cell-free supernatants from each population were visually inspected for intensity of GFP and also assayed for the presence of the RRV genome by real-time PCR.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Cell lines latently infected with RRV-GFP. (A) BJAB or 293 cells were infected with RRV-GFP and passaged for several weeks. The BJAB-RRV-GFP-positive cells were sorted and pooled by flow cytometry. Cell lines were passaged in GCV to confirm the persistence of latent infection. (B) RRV can undergo lytic replication in RhFs and HUVEC but not in 293 or BJAB cells. Cells were infected with RRV-GFP at an MOI of 1, and infections were carried out for 72 h. Cell-free supernatants were harvested, and viral infectivity was determined by plaque assay.
|
4 kb, 3 kb, and 800 nt and were similar to those of transcripts previously reported to be expressed during RRV lytic replication in RhFs (14).
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. R-LANA is expressed in cell lines latently infected with RRV. (A) Total RNA was harvested from latently infected 293-RRV-GFP cells, and RT-PCR was performed with primers specific for Orf71/vFLIP, Orf72/vCyc, and Orf73/R-LANA. Lanes -RT and +RT, RT-negative and -positive lanes, respectively. (B) Five micrograms of total RNA from either 293 or 293-RRV-GFP cells was run on an agarose gel and transferred to nitrocellulose. Northern hybridization was performed with an R-LANA 32P-labeled DNA probe. Three bands were observed (arrows) at 4 kB, 3 kB, and 800 nt. (C) 5' RACE was used to determine the major lytic (nt 120742), minor lytic (nt 122201), and latent (nt 120728) R-LANA transcription start sites in the RRV 26-95 genome and to confirm the presence of sense-specific R-LANA transcripts in both latently infected and lytic cells. Transcription stop sites were located at nt 117835 and 118197. The start codon of R-LANA in RRV26-95 is at position 119992, and the stop codon lies at position 118646.
|
Characterization of the R-LANA protein. Following detection of the R-LANA transcript from both lytic and latent RRV cell culture systems, we amplified by PCR and cloned the R-LANA gene with an N-terminal FLAG epitope tag into the pEF mammalian expression vector to generate a pEF-R-LANAFLAG plasmid. 293 cells were transfected with the pEF vector alone or the pEF-R-LANAFLAG plasmid. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were harvested and lysed. Cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. Immunoblotting was performed with FLAG antibody (Sigma). We observed that the R-LANA protein migrated as a doublet at a molecular mass of approximately 70 kDa, as shown in Fig. 3A, which is higher than its predicted molecular mass of 49 kDa. The appearance of a doublet suggested the possibility that R-LANA was phosphorylated within the cell. To test this idea, we performed immunoprecipitations on 293 cells transiently transfected with the pEF-R-LANAFLAG plasmid and subjected the immunoprecipitated protein to CIP treatment. We observed that the presence of CIP shifted all of the R-LANA-specific signal to the faster-migrating form, which we interpret to represent the hypophosphorylated protein (Fig. 3B). This experiment suggests that R-LANA is phosphorylated similarly to KSHV LANA.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. The R-LANA protein can form homodimers. (A) R-LANA mobility by SDS-PAGE. Ten-centimeter dishes of 293 cells were transfected with either 15 µg of the pEF empty vector or the pEF-R-LANAFLAG plasmid, and cells were harvested 48 h posttransfection. Lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was performed with an anti-FLAG ( -FLAG) antibody, and R-LANA-specific bands were visualized at approximately 70 kDa. I.B., immunoblotting. (B) R-LANA is a phosphorylated protein. Immunoprecipitated R-LANAFLAG from three 10-cm dishes of 293 cells transfected with the pEF-R-LANAFLAG plasmid was divided equally and digested with CIP (lane 1) or mock digested (lane 2) and subjected to Western blotting with an anti-FLAG antibody. (C) R-LANA can undergo homodimerization. 293 cells on 10-cm dishes were transfected with 10 µg of either pEF-R-LANAAU1, pEF-R-LANAFLAG, or pEGFP-N1, as indicated. Lysates were immunoprecipitated (I.P.) with an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody, washed stringently, and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was performed with an anti-AU1 antibody. (D) R-LANA dimerizes with itself but does not bind GFP. 293 cells on 10-cm dishes were transfected with 10 µg of pEF-R-LANAFLAG and either 10 µg of pR-LANA-GFP or 10 µg of pEGFP-N1, as indicated. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-GFP monoclonal antibody, washed stringently, and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was performed with either an anti-FLAG antibody or an anti-GFP antibody.
|
R-LANA exhibits a punctate nuclear staining pattern. To determine the subcellular localization of R-LANA, we designed a fusion construct, R-LANAFL-RFP, consisting of the full-length (FL) R-LANA protein fused in-frame to the amino terminus of RFP (Fig. 4a). To delineate the domains of R-LANA that were responsible for its cellular localization, several mutant R-LANA proteins were also constructed and fused in-frame to the dsRed protein, as depicted in Fig. 4a. Specifically, R-LANA1-25-RFP represents a protein with the first 25 amino acids of R-LANA fused to the N terminus of RFP. Similarly, R-LANA46-448-RFP and R-LANA297-448-RFP represent proteins with amino acids 46 to 448 and amino acids 297 to 448 of R-LANA, respectively, fused to RFP. Plasmids expressing the full-length R-LANA protein (R-LANAFL-RFP), R-LANA1-25-RFP, R-LANA46-448-RFP, and R-LANA297-448-RFP were individually transfected into RhFs. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were fixed and treated with DAPI stain and visualized under a fluorescence microscope.
![]() ![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Cellular localization of R-LANA. (a) Mutant R-LANA-RFP proteins. Mutant R-LANA proteins were generated by PCR, and all products were fused in-frame to the N terminus of RFP. The localization of R-LANA is denoted as follows: N, nuclear; Sp, speckled; Diff, diffuse; Nlr, nucleolar. (b) Subcellular localization of mutant R-LANA-RFP proteins. RhFs were transfected with R-LANA-RFP (A), R-LANA1-25-RFP (B), R-LANA46-448-RFP (C), and R-LANA297-448-RFP (D). Forty-eight hours later, cells were fixed and stained with DAPI. Images were captured under a fluorescence microscope. For panels A through D, the upper left section shows a phase-contrast image, the upper right section shows a DAPI image, the lower left section shows RFP, and the lower right section shows an overlay of DAPI and RFP. (c) Nucleolar localization of R-LANA. RhFs were transfected with fibrillarin-GFP and R-LANA-RFP (A) or R-LANA297-448-RFP (B). Forty-eight hours later, cells were fixed and stained with DAPI. Images were captured under a fluorescence microscope. (A) Phase-contrast image (a), green fluorescence with fibrillarin-GFP combined with DAPI staining (b), red fluorescence of the R-LANA-RFP protein combined with DAPI staining (c), and an overlay of fibrillarin-GFP, R-LANA-RFP, and DAPI staining (d). (B) Phase-contrast image (e), green fluorescence with fibrillarin-GFP combined with DAPI staining (f), red fluorescence of the R-LANA297-448-RFP proteincombined with DAPI staining (g), and an overlay of fibrillarin-GFP, R-LANA297-448-RFP, and DAPI staining (h).
|
RRV LANA binds the viral episome during latency. One of the main functions of the KSHV LANA protein is to tether the KSHV episome to the host cell mitotic chromosomes, in order to ensure segregation of viral genomes to daughter cells (4, 9, 10, 23, 24, 26). To determine whether R-LANA can bind the RRV genome during latency, we employed an immunoprecipitation assay. Latently infected 293-RRV-GFP cells were transfected with either a plasmid expressing RFP or the R-LANAFL-RFP construct. Forty-eight hours later, cells were harvested, lysed, and then subjected to immunoprecipitation with an anti-RFP antibody. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to several stringent washes, and DNA was eluted from the beads with a sodium bicarbonate-SDS buffer and subjected to a dot blot hybridization procedure. DNA immunoprecipitated by the RFP and R-LANAFL-RFP proteins was spotted on nitrocellulose, along with known quantities of RRV-GFP genomic DNA, and the membrane was probed with 32P-labeled GFP DNA (Fig. 5A). The intensity signals of the hybridized probes were quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager (Fig. 5B). We observed that the R-LANA-RFP fusion protein bound more RRV genomic DNA than the RFP protein alone. We also repeated this immunoprecipitation assay using lysates from 293-RRV-GFP cells transfected with either the pEF-R-LANAFLAG or pEF plasmid alone, performed an immunoprecipitation reaction with the anti-FLAG antibody, and subjected the immunoprecipitated DNA to a more sensitive real-time PCR assay (15) in order to quantitate the amount of viral genomes bound by R-LANA. Using this assay, we found that R-LANA bound the RRV genome to a significantly greater extent (eightfold) than the pEF empty vector alone. Because the immunoprecipitation technique that we employed does not involve sonication or shearing of the DNA, we think it likely that the viral genome is maintained as an extrachromosomal episome, as would be the case for true herpesviral latency. These results indicate that, similar to its KSHV homolog, R-LANA, can bind the viral genome during RRV latency.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. R-LANA can bind the RRV viral genome. (A) Dot blot hybridization. 293-RRV-GFP cells in a 10-cm dish were transfected with 15 µg of the indicated plasmids. Seventy-two hours posttransfection, cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with an anti-dsRed antibody. DNA was eluted from the beads and evaluated for viral DNA content by dot blot hybridization with a GFP probe. Top, DNA eluted from the anti-dsRed immunoprecipitation reactions; bottom, various quantities of RRV-GFP viral genomic DNA spotted on the same nitrocellulose filter. All hybridized spots were quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager. (B) The signal intensity of RRV viral DNA bound to the full-length R-LANAFL-RFP fusion protein was 3.5 times greater than the intensity of DNA bound to the RFP alone. (C) 293 cells were transfected and harvested as described for panel A. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-FLAG antibody. DNA was eluted from the beads and evaluated for viral DNA content with a sensitive real-time PCR assay. An approximately eightfold-greater amount of RRV genomic DNA was bound to the R-LANA protein than to the vector control.
|
1. Seventy-two hours postinfection, viral supernatant was harvested and quantitated by a previously established real-time PCR assay (15). We observed that R-LANA expression dramatically inhibited RRV replication in RhFs and that there was a 2.5-fold reduction in viral titer (Fig. 6). R-LANA's effects on the RRV lytic cycle, compared to its effects on RhFs expressing RFP alone, could also be reproduced in RhFs expressing the R-LANA-RFP fusion protein (data not shown), confirming that the presence of R-LANA inhibited viral replication, and this effect was not due to expression of a nonspecific exogenous protein, such as RFP. Interestingly, this reduction in viral titer also correlated with a reduced degree of cellular cytopathicity (as observed by microscopy) in the RhF cells that expressed the R-LANA-RFP protein.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. R-LANA inhibits RRV lytic replication. RhFs were transfected with either pEF or pEF-R-LANAFLAG. Twenty-four hours posttransfection, the cells were subsequently infected with RRV-GFP at an MOI of 1. Seventy-two hours postinfection, cell-free supernatants were harvested and assayed for viral DNA by real-time PCR.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. R-LANA interferes with RRV Orf50 transactivation. 293 cells were transfected with 0.5 µg of the indicated reporter and 2.5 µg of each of the expression plasmids. The vector samples received 2.5 µg of pcDNA3 and 2.5 µg of pEF. The Orf50 samples received 2.5 µg of pcDNA3-Orf50 and 2.5 µg of pEF. The R-LANA samples received 2.5 µg of pcDNA3 and 2.5 µg of pEF-R-LANA. The Orf50-plus-R-LANA samples received 2.5 µg of pcDNA3-ORF50 plus 2.5 µg of pEF-R-LANA. The three lytic RRV promoter-reporter constructs, Orf50p, R8p, and Orf57p, have been previously described (14). Cells were harvested 48 h posttransfection, and lysates were assayed for luciferase activity. Luciferase activity for cells transfected with each of the individual promoter-reporter constructs (Orf50p, R8p, and Orf57p) and pcDNA3-Orf50 alone was assigned a value of 100%. The luciferase activities of the other samples were then calculated as percentages of the activity obtained with pcDNA3-Orf50 alone.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. TSA relieves R-LANA-mediated repression and promotes viral reactivation. (A) 293 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids and treated with either TSA (gray bars) or ethanol (black bars). Luciferase activities for cells transfected with pcDNA3-Orf50 alone were set at 100%, and luciferase activities of the cells cotransfected with pcDNA3-Orf50 and pcDNA3-R-LANA were calculated as percentages of the activity seen with RRV Orf50 alone. (B) The 293-RRV-GFP (gray bars) and BJAB-RRV-GFP (black bars) cell lines were treated with either TPA (25 ng/ml) or an equivalent volume of DMSO and TSA (100 nM) or an equivalent volume of ethanol. Seventy-two hours postinduction, cell-free supernatants were harvested and viral titers were analyzed by a RRV real-time PCR assay.
|
|
|
|---|
Northern hybridization of total RNA from either BJAB-RRV-GFP or 293-RRV-GFP cells indicated that R-LANA is transcribed during latent RRV infection. Previously, we have reported that messages for sense-specific R-LANA transcripts are produced during lytic infection (14). In this report, the same pattern and size of R-LANA-encoded transcripts were observed in the latent-RRV-infected cells. Further, we also observed mRNA transcripts specific for ORFs 71 and 72, the viral FLIP, and cyclin D1 homologs by RT-PCR in the latently infected cells. These polycistronic transcripts encoding RRV LANA, v-cyclin, and vFLIP are similar to those described for KSHV (17, 52).
The R-LANA protein migrated as a doublet at a molecular mass of
70 kDa. This doublet was reduced to a single band upon treatment with CIP, which demonstrated that R-LANA is phosphorylated. The phosphorylated form of the protein appears to be the less abundant of the two protein species. The functional significance of R-LANA phosphorylation or the kinase responsible for R-LANA phosphorylation is currently unknown. However, since R-LANA phosphorylation occurs in RRV-negative cell lines, we can speculate that the kinase involved in this phosphorylation is not likely to be of viral origin.
We determined that, similar to its KSHV counterpart (4, 9, 10, 23, 24, 26, 36), R-LANA could also bind the RRV viral genome, and we are currently mapping the exact RRV genomic region that interacts with R-LANA. R-LANA exhibited a speckled nuclear subcellular localization when expressed as an RFP fusion protein. This localization pattern is identical to that observed for KSHV LANA in BCBL-1 cells (29, 47). The region of R-LANA responsible for this localization lies within the first 25 amino acids of the protein. This is equivalent to the position identified as the host chromosome binding site for KSHV LANA (44). Further mutational analysis of this region in KSHV LANA revealed that three stretches within amino acids 5 to 13 are necessary (5), specifically 5GMR7, 8LRS10, and 11GRS13. R-LANA contains three similar motifs within amino acids 3 to 19, specifically 3GSR5, 16GLR18, and 17LRS19, any of which may regulate the observed localization and subsequent binding to the rhesus chromosome.
We also found that R-LANA has multiple nuclear localization signals. In addition, the C-terminal 151 amino acids demonstrated a nucleolar localization, as evidenced by their colocalization with fibrillarin-GFP. This is an interesting result because the full-length protein does not show the same intense subnuclear localization. This suggests that full-length R-LANA contains a motif capable of nucleolar localization or interaction with a nucleolar protein that is likely regulated or masked by another region of the R-LANA protein. Other herpesviral proteins, such as the Marek's disease virus MEQ oncoprotein, have been shown to be localized to the nucleolus (38), and this property is governed by amino acids rich in arginine and lysine. R-LANA has two stretches of arginine and lysine residues (RKYRPQRR and KKARRR) in its carboxy terminus that could potentially mediate this localization, and studies to identify the sequences responsible for this nucleolar localization are ongoing.
Exogenous expression of R-LANA in RhFs dramatically inhibited RRV replication, resulting in a 2.5-fold reduction in viral titer at 72 h postinfection. We observed that cells expressing the R-LANA-RFP fusion protein, when infected with our RRV-GFP recombinant virus, were more resistant to virus- induced cytopathicity. The green fluorescence of the RRV-GFP virus in these cells was dimmer than that in neighboring cells not expressing R-LANA-RFP (S. M. DeWire and B. Damania, unpublished observation), thus suggesting a lower viral copy number in R-LANA-expressing RhFs. These subjective findings lend support to the results that we obtained from our quantitative real-time PCR assays showing that R-LANA expression in RhFs decreased RRV viral titers. Using this type of analysis, we cannot rule out the possibility that R-LANA is indirectly causing some cellular toxicity or altering cellular stress response pathways. However, the abundance of data that we present here regarding the direct impact of R-LANA on the transcriptional regulation of the Orf50 promoter suggests that this is a significant mechanism that contributes to the inhibition of RRV replication by R-LANA. Similar analyses have been used in other related viral systems. For example, in herpesvirus saimiri (HVS), the same inhibition of de novo lytic replication by Orf73 has been observed (52). In HVS, Orf73's ability to directly repress the lytic switch gene promoter is the mechanism used to explain the inhibition of lytic replication observed with this protein (53). While we did not observe any direct effect of R-LANA expression on the RRV Orf50 promoter in the absence of the RRV Orf50 protein, it is possible that the RRV Orf50 promoter fragment used in our assay (which contains a 193-nt element upstream of the Orf50 transcription start site (14), may be too minimal and that a larger RRV Orf50p fragment may be more susceptible to R-LANA-mediated repression. While this article was in preparation, Lan et al. (35) reported that KSHV LANA can inhibit KSHV viral reactivation by interaction with Orf50 (58). However this report did not address the mechanism for how KSHV LANA can mediate the repression of Orf50 function. Our findings suggest that the mechanism of R-LANA-mediated repression of RRV viral replication is, at least in part, mediated by activation or recruitment of HDACs. KSHV LANA has previously been shown to function as a repressor (55), and this repression appeared to be mediated through the mSiN3 complex (33). Thus, it appears that the ability to repress promoters is conserved among the LANA homologs of the gamma-herpesviruses.
One possible explanation for our finding is that R-LANA is able to posttranslationally modify or downregulate Orf50 function. We performed Western blotting on Orf50 in the presence or absence of R-LANA and found no evidence for such posttranslation changes to Orf50 (S. M. DeWire and B. Damania, unpublished observation). Another possible explanation involves chromatin remodeling. Histone acetylation and deacetylation have been implicated in KSHV Orf50 and LANA function in previous reports. Both KSHV Orf50 and LANA have been shown to interact with the histone acetyltransferase CBP (25, 37), and Orf50 has been shown to interact with HDAC1 (25). Further, histone modifications at the KSHV Orf50 promoter have been shown to result in reactivation (39). Specifically, HDAC1, -5, and -7 were associated with the KSHV Orf50 promoter, and upon treatment with HDAC inhibitors were replaced by CBP, resulting in transcription (39). Because the addition of TSA abolished R-LANA-mediated interference of RRV Orf50 and induced RRV reactivation from the latently infected 293-RRV-GFP and BJAB-RRV-GFP cells, we speculate that a similar histone modification process likely occurs during RRV viral replication and reactivation. We cannot, however, rule out the possibility that TSA could affect other pathways that result in viral reactivation. Interestingly, KSHV has previously been reported to reactivate upon treatment with another HDAC inhibitor, n-butyrate (42), and this may occur through the relief of KSHV LANA-mediated repression of KSHV Orf50 function, similar to our findings with RRV LANA.
In this report, we describe the nuclear, speckled localization of R-LANA, its ability to self-associate, and its capacity to bind the latent RRV episome. We have also shown that R-LANA functions to downregulate Orf50 transcriptional activation via a mechanism that involves HDACs. Finally, we observed that R-LANA can inhibit RRV replication and we suggest that this repressive effect of R-LANA may be important in maintaining viral latency and suppressing viral reactivation. Thus, R-LANA's downregulation of RRV Orf50 function may be an evolutionarily conserved mechanism by which gamma-herpesviruses are able to suppress viral reactivation at inopportune times.
S. M. DeWire is supported, in part, by American Heart Association predoctoral fellowship 0315389U. This work was supported by grants from the American Association for Cancer Research, American Heart Association (0355852U), and NIH grants CA096500 and AI58093.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»