Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2005, p. 1958-1960, Vol. 79, No. 3
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.3.1958-1960.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Biochemistry and Biophysics,1 Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas2
Received 20 July 2004/ Accepted 8 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The specific stimulation of very late promoters by VLF-1 has also been observed in transient expression assays (10, 14). The addition of plasmids encoding VLF-1 stimulated expression from the two very late promoters, polh and p10, but had little or no effect on two late promoters, vp39 and p6.9. Late and very late promoters differ primarily by the presence or absence of a burst sequence, a sequence downstream of the transcriptional start site that is 90% A+T (3, 5, 7, 9). The burst sequence of a very late promoter is needed in order to respond to stimulation by VLF-1 in transient-expression assays, and gel mobility shift and footprinting assays also indicated that VLF-1 specifically bound to the burst sequence in vitro (12).
The mechanism by which VLF-1 stimulates very late genes, however, is unknown. When VLF-1 was originally described, the authors who described it noted sequence similarity with the integrase family of tyrosine recombinases (4). While the homology is intriguing, it lends few clues as to the function of VLF-1. The other members of this family are primarily involved in DNA integration and DNA replication, and none of them are known to act as transcription factors. Furthermore, all integrases and tyrosine recombinases are characterized by an essential active-site tyrosine which forms a covalent protein-DNA intermediate (1, 6). VLF-1 has this conserved tyrosine but it is not required for VLF-1 to stimulate transcription (14). Thus, it seems unlikely that the mechanism of VLF-1 function in transcription is related to integration or recombination.
To characterize the mechanism of VLF-1 function, we purified VLF-1 by using a baculovirus overexpression system in order to examine its activity in transcription reactions containing purified baculovirus RNA polymerase (RNApol). A recombinant virus, called AcVLF-1, containing the vlf-1 gene under the control of the polyhedrin promoter was constructed according to standard procedures (8). A 1,685-bp SpeI-SspI fragment of an AcNPV HindIII-B genomic clone was inserted into the XbaI and SmaI sites of pVL1393. Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells were cotransfected with 5 µg of the resulting transfer vector, pVLF-1, and 2 µg of BakPak viral DNA previously digested with Bsu36I. Individual plaques were further purified, and the correct construction of AcVLF1 was verified by restriction digestion and sequence analysis. Nuclear extracts prepared from AcVLF1-infected cells at 60 h postinfection contained a highly expressed protein compared to extracts infected with wild-type virus (Fig. 1). This protein migrated at the position expected for VLF-1. Crude extracts were precipitated with saturated ammonium sulfate and dialyzed for loading onto a heparin affinity column. VLF-1 was purified by affinity chromatography on a heparin agarose column by using column buffers as previously described for the baculovirus protein PP31 (2). Fractions were monitored by Coomassie blue staining of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gels. Peak fractions were pooled, diluted, and loaded onto a Mono S cation exchange column. Fractions containing purified VLF-1 were pooled and stored in 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2)-400 mM KCl-50% glycerol-1 mM dithiothreitol-0.1 mM EDTA. The yield of purified VLF-1 ranged from 50 to 200 µg per liter of infected cells. The purified protein was subjected to peptide mass fingerprinting. Masses from 15 tryptic peptides were fit to the masses of predicted VLF-1 peptides, representing 39.3% coverage, which is sufficient to confirm that the purified protein was indeed VLF-1.
![]() View larger version (64K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Purification of VLF-1. Baculovirus expression. Nuclear extracts (NE) were prepared at 60 h postinfection from S. frugiperda cells infected with wild-type (WT) AcNPV (lane 2) or the recombinant Ac-VLF1 (lane 3). Nuclear extracts were purified on a heparin (Hep) column, and peak fractions (lane 4) were further purified on a Mono S column (S) (lane 5). Each lane contains 2 µg of protein. Lane 1, crude extract; lane 2, protein eluted from Talon matrix with 100 mM imidazole; lane 3, peak fraction from a Mono S column. The position of VLF-1 is indicated by an arrow on the right, and the positions of relevant molecular markers are indicated on the left.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. VLF-1 enhances transcription from the polyhedrin promoter. (A) Schematic diagram of the transcriptional templates pPolh/CFS (polh/CFS) and 39kL/CFS. The open box represents the C-free cassette. The darkly shaded box represents the polyhedrin (polh) promoter, the lightly shaded box represents the 39k late promoter, and the black box represents the burst sequence. (B) Transcription assay. Lane 1, X174/HinfI marker; lanes 2 to 6, transcripts produced from reaction mixtures containing 0.04 µM purified RNA polymerase; 0.4 pmol of each template in the absence of VLF-1 (lane 2) or increasing amounts of purified VLF-1 (0.16 to 1.28 µM in twofold increments [lanes 3 to 6]) were incubated under standard transcription reaction conditions at 30°C for 12 min. The RNA transcripts were resolved on 6% polyacrylamide-8 M urea gel and exposed on PhosphorImager plates. The positions of the transcripts are indicated on the right. The positions of relevant molecular size markers are indicated in nucleotides on the left. (C) Transcripts were quantitated by using ImageQuant software and plotted as the ratio of the polh transcript to the 39k transcript as a function of input VLF-1 concentration.
|
burst/CFS was constructed by inserting a double-stranded oligonucleotide containing the polyhedrin promoter lacking the burst sequence (ATCATGGAGATAATTAAAATGATAACCATCTCGCAAATAAATAAGTATTTT) into the SmaI site of pCFS, the parental plasmid for pPolh/CFS (11). In transcription assays involving equimolar amounts of pPolh/CFS and pPol
burst/CFS in the absence of VLF-1, the levels of transcripts from both templates were equivalent. The addition of VLF-1 at a concentration yielding half-maximal stimulation increased the amount of pPolh/CFS transcript relative to that of pPolh
burst/CFS added to the same tube by a factor of 4.4 ± 0.3 in triplicate reactions (Fig. 3A). This result indicates that the burst sequence is a major determinant of VLF-1 action.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Transcriptional enhancement by VLF-1 requires a burst sequence. (A) Transcription from the polyhedrin promoter in the presence and absence of a burst sequence. Transcripts were produced from in vitro transcription reaction mixtures containing pPolh/CFS and pPolh burst/CFS. Transcripts were quantified by using ImageQuant software and calculated as the ratio of pPolh/CFS to pPolh burst/CFS transcript. (B) Transcription from the chimeric p39kLburst/CFS template is stimulated by VLF-1. Reactions contained equimolar amounts of p39kL/CFS and pp39kLburst/CFS. Transcripts were quantified by using ImageQuant software.
|
In vivo, the timing of expression and high level of synthesis of polyhedrin appear to be regulated by the concentration of VLF-1. VLF-1 is a late protein and so is not present during the early stages of infection (4). VLF-1 appears by 15 h postinfection and increases through 24 h postinfection (14). Polyhedrin protein is synthesized at low levels during the late stage of infection but increases significantly thereafter, reaching maximum levels at 36 to 48 h postinfection. Furthermore, the timing of polyhedrin expression can be modified by varying the onset of VLF-1 expression (14). Construction of recombinant viruses with vlf-1 cloned under the control of a strong late promoter resulted in higher levels of VLF-1 and accelerated expression of polyhedrin. In contrast, production of a recombinant virus with vlf-1 under the control of a minimal promoter produced lower levels of VLF-1 and reduced expression of polyhedrin. Together, these experiments suggest that polyhedrin expression is regulated by the intracellular concentration of VLF-1 (13). The results presented here are consistent with these observations, as they show that templates containing a burst sequence were stimulated by VLF-1 in a concentration-dependent manner. Questions still remain regarding the mechanism of VLF-1 function, but the results presented here suggest that it can be studied by using this in vitro system, which is amenable to biochemical analyses.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»