Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2005, p. 1765-1771, Vol. 79, No. 3
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.3.1765-1771.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Yasuhiro Takeuchi,1
Thomas Relander,2
Johan Richter,2
Ranbir Bailey,1
David A. Sanders,3
Mary K. L. Collins,1 and
Yasuhiro Ikeda1*
Department of Immunology and Molecular Pathology, University College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom,1 Department of Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden,2 Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana3
Received 26 May 2004/ Accepted 7 September 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiments utilizing animal models are useful and often required in preclinical gene therapy research. It would, therefore, be ideal if the same gene transfer vector can be used in both humans and the model animals. Recently, we reported the high-titer stable producer cell lines for the HIV-1 vectors with amphotropic murine leukemia virus (MLV-A), feline endogenous RD114, and gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) Env (13, 31). The RD114- and GALV-pseudotyped vectors, however, cannot be used in murine models, as there is no functional cellular receptor for RD114 and GALV Env in mouse cells (24). Although the HIV-1 vectors pseudotyped with MLV-A Env [HIV-1(MLV-A)] can transduce both human and mouse cells through its cellular receptor, Pit-2 (24), their transduction efficiency may depend on the expression levels of its receptors on the target cells (16). Therefore, an HIV vector pseudotyped with an alternative broad-host-range Env, which can utilize the other cellular factor(s) as a receptor(s), would be necessary when the target cells poorly express Pit-2.
Alphaviruses belong to the family Togaviridae and are found in insects, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Although it remains unknown what molecules act as cellular receptors for these viruses, it has been suggested that several receptors or several receptor-coreceptor combinations are involved in virus entry (12, 32). Alphaviruses exhibit a wide host range and cellular tropism, most of which are important gene therapy targets including antigen-presenting cells, neurons, and muscle cells (12, 32). Recently, pseudotyping of HIV-1 vectors has been shown with glycoproteins from members of the alphaviruses, namely, Ross River virus (RRV), Semliki Forest virus (SFV), and Sindbis virus (14, 21). As RRV glycoproteins E2E1 could be stably expressed as part of an MLV producer cell line (29), we considered the use of alphavirus glycoproteins in our stable HIV-1 packaging cell line STAR (13).
In this study, we first examined the efficiency of pseudotype production when alphavirus Env was incorporated into the STAR producer cell line. Next, parameters that would affect alphavirus pseudotyped HIV-1 use in vivo and ex vivo, such as resistance to inactivation in human sera and thermostability, were investigated. This investigation was performed in comparison to HIV-1 virions pseudotyped with VSV-G or MLV-A Env. VSV-G is most commonly used in vitro and ex vivo, while MLV-A Env has been used in the transduction of several clinically relevant cell types in clinical trials (3, 4, 6). Finally, we assessed the host cell ranges of the alphavirus Env-pseudotyped HIV-1 vectors and how efficiently the vectors would transduce a number of cell lines from different species as well as human and murine primary cell cultures.
|
|
|---|
Transient virus production.
Virus was harvested from 10-cm-diameter plates. A total of 4 x 106 293T cells were plated 24 h before transfection. Cells were transiently transfected with plasmid at a 3:2:1 weight ratio of vector plasmid (pHR'SINcPPT-SE [7]) to packaging plasmid (pCMV
R8.91 [33]) to Env plasmid by using Lipofectamine (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Env plasmids pMD-G (VSV-G) (23), phCMV-A (MLV-A) (2), pRRV-E2E1A (RRV) (29), and pSFV-E2E1A (SFV) (14) were used. After washing with OptiMEM, virus was harvested for 48 h at 37°C in 8 ml of OptiMEM (Gibco BRL). Viral supernatant was then passed through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter.
Generation of STAR cells producing alphavirus pseudotypes. The HIV-1 vector-harboring STAR cell clone (STAR-HV#12) was transfected with pRRV-E2E1A or pSFV-E2E1A and then selected in the presence of 100 µg of zeocin/ml for 2 weeks.
Stable virus production. HIV-1(RRV), HIV-1(SFV), and HIV-1(MLV-A) vectors were harvested from STAR cell clones STAR-HV12-RRV#B, STAR-HV12-SFV#A, and STAR-Ampho-HV#2, respectively. A total of 5 x 106 cells were plated onto 10-cm-diameter plates with Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium with 10% FCS. The cells were maintained at 37°C for 36 h, and the supernatants were replaced with the FCS-free medium OptiMEM (Gibco BRL). The cells were cultured at 37°C for 24 h and further maintained at 32°C for 18 h. The culture supernatants were harvested as RRV, SFV, and MLV-A Env pseudotypes. STAR-HV#12 was transfected with pMD-G in OptiMEM, and the FCS-free culture supernatants were used as HIV-1(VSV-G). For human hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) experiments, we harvested HIV-1(RRV) and HIV-1(MLV-A) in FCS-free medium (X-vivo15; Biowhittaker Cell Biology) instead of OptiMEM. The supernatants from STAR cells constantly contained 450 to 650 ng of p24 of HIV-1 Gag/ml, while HIV-1 vectors produced by conventional three-plasmid transfection had about 100 ng of p24/ml (13, 31).
Viral titer determination. A total of 2 x 105 cells were inoculated with serial dilutions of viral supernatant. Forty-eight hours after infection, enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) titers (international units per milliliter) were determined by using a fluorescence-activated cell scanner (FACS). Where indicated, titrations were carried out in the presence of 8 µg of Polybrene (hexadimethrine bromide; Sigma, Poole, United Kingdom)/ml or with centrifugal inoculation, or "spinoculation" (1,200 x g, 2 h, 25°C), or both. Unless otherwise stated, the minimum level of detection by FACS in our experiments was 2 x 103 IU/ml.
Concentration. All pseudotypes were harvested in OptiMEM. Ten milliliters of each supernatant was concentrated at 105 x g (SW41 rotor at 35,000 rpm, 1.5 h, 4°C) by using a Beckman L7 ultracentrifuge. The pellet was resuspended in 500 µl of OptiMEM. Thirty milliliters of supernatant was concentrated at 3,000 x g with a Heraeus (Sepatech) Megafuge 2.0R bench top centrifuge. Here, the pellet was resuspended in 1.5 ml of OptiMEM. Where indicated, virus was diluted with OptiMEM.
Preparation of human sera. Human peripheral blood was incubated on ice overnight. Serum from the clot was aliquoted and frozen at 80°C (fresh serum preparation) until required or heat inactivated at 56°C for 45 min and then frozen at 80°C (heat-inactivated serum preparation).
Isolation of murine DC. Murine dendritic cells (DC) from bone marrow were prepared by using a standard protocol (25). Briefly, bone marrow cells were grown in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 10% FCS, 5 µg of apotransferrin (Sigma)/ml, 5 x 105 M 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco BRL), 100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 µg of streptomycin (Gibco BRL)/ml, and 50 ng of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)/ml.
Isolation of human monocyte-derived DC. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated on Ficoll gradients. Monocytes were allowed to adhere for 2 h on non-tissue-culture-treated plates and washed extensively. Monocytes were then removed in EDTA, washed, and replated at the desired density on tissue culture plates and grown in RPMI medium plus 10% FCS, antibiotics, interleukin-4 (IL-4), and GM-CSF (1,000 U/ml) as described previously (27). Four days later, DC cultures were depleted of CD2-, CD3-, and CD19-expressing cells by negative immunomagnetic selection and replated at the desired density. After infection studies, DC were identified by expression of CD1a by FACScan.
Isolation of human lymphocytes. T lymphocytes were isolated on the basis of nonadherence to tissue culture after isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells on Ficoll gradients. T lymphocytes were then cultured in RPMI medium plus 10% FCS supplemented with 100 U of IL-2 (Peprotech)/ml and 1 µg of concanavalin A (Sigma)/ml for 48 h. Cells were then washed, replated, and cultured for a further 3 days in RPMI medium plus 10% FCS supplemented with IL-2.
Transduction of dendritic and lymphocyte cell cultures. After 5 days of culture, DC were washed and exposed to virus at the required multiplicity of infection (MOI) on 293T cells, as standardized on 293T cells, overnight and then washed thoroughly and cultured for a further 7 days in culture medium. The percent cell transduction was then determined by FACScan. Virus used in these experiments was titrated onto 293T cells in the presence of 8 µg of Polybrene/ml in parallel.
Isolation and infection of human CD34+ cells. Isolation and infection of human CD34+ cells were carried out as previously described (26).
|
|
|---|
Next, we examined if HIV-1 vectors with alphavirus glycoproteins could be generated from stable HIV-1 producer cells. The HIV-1 vector-harboring STAR cells were transfected with the RRV, SFV, and MLV-A Env expression plasmids and then selected in phleomycin for 3 weeks. We selected 48 clones of each plasmid and screened them for vector production. Although a significant number of STAR cell clones producing HIV-1(RRV) or HIV-1(SFV) could be obtained after the first screening, many clones lost their titers during prolonged culture (up to 5 months) (Table 1). MLV-A Env expression, however, appeared to be more stable than the alphavirus Env, as most of the positive clones remained positive for up to 5 months. When screened after 20 weeks in culture, vector titers from the five RRV-stable clones were 1 x 105 to 4 x 105 IU/ml, while the three SFV clones could produce virus with titers of 5 x 103 to 2 x 104 IU/ml on 293T cells. Therefore, unlike MLV-A Env, introduction of RRV and SFV Envs into STAR cells did not increase viral titers above those seen in transient virus production experiments. Due to the relatively low titer of HIV-1(SFV), the properties of HIV-1(RRV) were examined in subsequent experiments.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Screening of STAR cells expressing RRV and SFV Enva
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Alphavirus pseudotype inactivation in fresh human sera. MLV-A (Ampho) and RRV pseudotypes were harvested from STAR cells. HIV(VSV-G) was produced by transient transfection of 293T cells. Each virus was incubated (37°C for 1 h) 1:1 with heat-inactivated FCS and fresh or heat-inactivated human sera. Titrations were carried out on 293T cells in the presence of 8 µg of Polybrene/ml. eGFP titer was determined by FACS. Titer after incubation with fresh or heat-inactivated human sera is represented as a percentage of the viral titer after incubation with heat-inactivated FCS. Serum 1 and Serum 2 refer to different sera from different donors.
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Stability of alphavirus pseudotypes. Virus was titrated onto 293T cells in the presence of 8 µg of Polybrene/ml after incubation at 37°C for certain time points (A) or after a number of cycles between 37 and 80°C (B). eGFP titer was determined by FACS. Control titer is virus titer before treatment. This result is representative of two independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of Polybrene and spinoculation on HIV-1(RRV) infection. Each pseudotype was titrated onto 293T cells and spun down at 1,200 x g for 2 h at 25°C or titrated onto 293T cells in the presence of Polybrene (Pb) (8 µg/ml), or both. eGFP titer was determined by FACS. Values of relative titer compared to control titer in the absence of Polybrene and without spinoculation are shown. Data for HIV-1(RRV) are representative of at least two independent experiments.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Concentration of alphavirus pseudotypes
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Correlation of virus dose and infectiona
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Infection of cell lines derived from several species. Titrations were carried out on the cell lines indicated in the presence of 8 µg of Polybrene/ml. eGFP titer was determined by FACS. Averages of two independent experiments are shown. Minimum level of detection by FACS in these experiments was 5 x 103 IU/ml. Hu, human; Mu, murine; Rh, rhesus monkey.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Transduction of human HSC and C57BL/6-derived mouse dendritic cells (mDC). Vector transduction was examined by FACS. Mouse DC were also stained by anti-CD11c DC monoclonal antibody conjugated with Cy5.
|
Bone marrow cells from BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice were cultured with GM-CSF for 5 days. These immature mouse DC were then challenged with HIV-1(RRV) and HIV-1(MLV-A) produced from STAR cells as well as transiently produced HIV-1(VSV-G). Transduction efficiency was examined 7 days after infection. As depicted in Table 4, HIV-1(RRV) efficiently transduced murine DC. The relative efficiency of HIV-1(RRV) infection is evident when the input viral titers of HIV-1(RRV), HIV-1(VSV-G), and HIV-1(MLV-A) were adjusted to the same MOI (MOI of 3). As reported previously (11, 20, 25), HIV-1(VSV-G) efficiently transduced murine DC, particularly at a high dose. HIV-1(MLV-A), meanwhile, poorly transduced mouse DC.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Infection of murine and human primary cell culturesa
|
|
|
|---|
Here, we examined whether alphavirus glycoproteins E2E1 could be used in our stable HIV vector packaging cell line STAR (13). Indeed, we could obtain several STAR cell clones stably expressing RRV or SFV E2E1 (Table 1). Two RRV clones constantly produced 2 x 105 to 4 x 105 IU of HIV-1(RRV)/ml for more than 5 months. During screening of our clones, however, we noticed that many RRV or SFV E2E1-positive clones ceased producing infectious vectors after 5 to 11 weeks in culture (Table 1). This observation suggests that expression of RRV or SFV E2E1 was in general not as stable as MLV-A Env expression in STAR cells. We speculate that the expression of RRV and SFV proteins might be slightly cytotoxic in the context of STAR cells, which already express HIV-1 proteins (Gag, Pol, Rev, and Tat). It is also possible that HIV-1(RRV), like VSV-G pseudotypes (1), superinfects its own producers, causing genotoxic effects. Therefore, the cells gradually lose the Env expression, making virions eventually noninfectious.
Another possible explanation for loss of infectious vector production in RRV and SFV but not MLV-A Env-stable clones may be the difference in expression systems between the alphavirus and MLV-A Env constructs. The MLV-A Env is expressed by the MLV long terminal repeat, a construct that has been successfully used in long-term, high-titer retroviral-lentiviral vector production (8, 13). In contrast, alphavirus Env expression is controlled by the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter, which has been reported to be silenced by methylation during prolonged culture (18, 22). If this is the case, we may be able to improve the stability of RRV and SFV Env expression by cloning the alphavirus Env genes into the MLV long terminal repeat construct. It is, however, noted that a level of vector production similar to the transient system was maintained long term in several HIV-1(RRV) producer lines.
HIV-1(RRV) pseudotypes displayed a number of characteristics which would be advantageous in ex vivo and in vivo experiments. HIV-1(RRV) pseudotypes are resistant to inactivation by heat-labile components in fresh human sera (Fig. 1) and exhibit good thermostability at 37°C (Fig. 2A), which should be advantageous in systemic gene delivery. We also demonstrated that the HIV-1(RRV) can be concentrated by ultracentrifugation, although the vector recovery after concentration was not as good as that for HIV-1(VSV-G) (Table 2). Upon single-step concentration of RRV pseudotypes by ultracentrifugation (reduction in volume of 200-fold), we could achieve titers of up to 6 x 107 IU of HIV-1(RRV) stocks/ml (data not shown). Our concentration results are comparable to those obtained with RRV Env-pseudotyped feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV)-based vector (15). In that study, Kang and coworkers achieved titers of 5 x 104 to 5 x 105 IU/ml prior to concentration and 2 x 107 to 1.5 x 108 IU/ml after concentration (reduction in volume of 250-fold).
The ratio of cells transduced with VSV-G-pseudotyped MLV or HIV-1 vectors generally corresponds closely to 1e (MOI), as predicted from a Poisson distribution of transduction of the entire cellular population. At high MOI, VSV-G-pseudotyped vectors transduce more than 95% of the culture population and can achieve multiple transduction of more than 10 copies per cell (1, 31). Such transduction characteristics are believed to be due to high-level expression of its cellular receptor on the target cells. It is thought that phosphatidylserine is a receptor for VSV or, at least, acts as part of the cellular receptor complex for VSV-G (19, 28). Given the extremely broad host or cell range of the wild-type RRV, we expected that the transduction kinetics of HIV-1(RRV) would be similar to those of HIV-1(VSV-G). Unexpectedly, the transduction kinetics of HIV-1(RRV) were not dose dependent and reached a plateau at high MOI on human 293T and NP2 as well as mouse NIH 3T3 cell lines (Table 3). Unlike HIV-1(MLV-A), however, we did not observe any inhibitory effects at MOI 25 with the RRV pseudotypes. Since particle-free, soluble MLV-A Env in the HIV-1(MLV-A) preparation plays a major role as an inhibitor of HIV-1(MLV-A) infection (31), we speculate that the RRV E2E1-stable STAR cells do not shed soluble RRV glycoproteins into the culture supernatant or that glycoproteins shed into the supernatant cannot interact with RRV cellular receptors. Indeed, given HIV-1(MLV-A) titer, but not HIV-1(RRV) titer, can be improved by spinoculation (Fig. 3), it would appear that the Envs on these two pseudotypes interact with their cellular receptor(s) by different mechanisms.
HIV-1(RRV) could efficiently transduce cell lines from different species including human, rhesus monkey, mouse, cat, and quail but failed to transduce human and mouse T-cell lines, human primary T cells, and human HSC (Table 4 and Fig. 4). These results indicate that RRV can utilize the cellular receptors from different host species but that their expression is limited or absent on certain cell types such as T cells or HSC. We believe failure to transduce the cells mentioned above is most likely due to the lack or absence of cellular receptor expression on those cells, not a postentry block to infection, given the efficient transduction of HIV-1(VSV-G) on all cell lines. Previously, Kang and coworkers (15) demonstrated that in vivo administration of FIV(RRV) resulted in efficient transduction of hepatocytes and neuroglial cells, while transduction of neurons, skeletal muscle, or airway epithelial cells was inefficient. Again, we speculate that the inability to transduce these cell types may be due to limited receptor expression or the absence of receptor(s).
DC are potent antigen-presenting cells that play a critical role in the initiation of host immune responses. Genetically modified DC, which express certain antigens, have been used to elicit antigen-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte responses (30). Recently, we and others demonstrated that lentiviral transduction of murine DC in vitro and in vivo is a powerful immunotherapeutic strategy (10, 25). Although infectivity of RRV in DC has not been characterized, in vitro studies demonstrate that RRV can infect murine macrophage (17). We therefore reasoned that HIV-1(RRV) might efficiently transduce mouse DC. This appeared to be the case (Table 4). The RRV-pseudotyped vectors could efficiently transduce bone marrow-derived premature DC from BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Since FIV(RRV) causes less cytotoxicity in comparison to FIV(VSV-G) after systemic delivery (15), in vivo administration of HIV-1(RRV) may be a useful tool in immunotherapeutic strategies.
In conclusion, HIV-1 virions can be pseudotyped with RRV and SFV glycoproteins, and stable HIV packaging lines producing HIV-1(RRV) and HIV-1(SFV), equivalent in titer to transient production, were established. HIV-1(RRV) virions derived from STAR cells display characteristics, such as resistance to inactivation in fresh human sera, good stability at 37°C, and efficient concentration by ultracentrifugation, that would be advantageous in ex vivo and in vivo experiments. Furthermore, HIV-1(RRV) can be used to transduce cells from many species, including murine DC. Our data, however, indicate that the cellular receptor(s) for RRV is not as ubiquitous as that of VSV-G. Identification of the cellular receptor(s) for RRV will be helpful for a better understanding of how HIV-1(RRV) can be applied in the future.
Present address: MRC Virology Unit, Institute of Virology, Glasgow, United Kingdom. ![]()
|
|
|---|
B. J. Virol. 72:180-190.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»