Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2005, p. 15477-15493, Vol. 79, No. 24
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.24.15477-15493.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0712
Received 17 August 2005/ Accepted 26 September 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Upon infection, the viral DNA enters the nucleus and a subset of HCMV genomes are deposited at nuclear structures referred to variously as nuclear domain 10 (ND10) structures or promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) oncogenic domains (PODs), where viral RNA synthesis begins (21, 22). The HCMV tegument protein pp71 interacts with POD-associated Daxx, which may contribute to the initiation of transcription at POD sites (9, 20, 23, 28). The proximity of the PODs to the spliceosome assembly factor SC35 domains may aid in rapid expression of IE genes, which are often multiply spliced (22). A major region of viral IE transcription includes two genetic units, IE1 and IE2 (for reviews, see references 15 and 31). The predominant IE RNA (IE1) consists of four exons; a single open reading frame (ORF) (UL123) initiates in exon 2 and specifies a 72-kDa nuclear protein designated IE1-72. The IE2 gene product, IE2-86 (ORF UL122), is an 86-kDa protein that is encoded by an alternatively spliced RNA that contains the first three exons of IE1 and a different terminal exon. Another region of IE gene expression is UL36-38, which includes at least five transcripts directed by three promoters (1, 26, 49, 50). One of the promoters directs the synthesis of several spliced 3.2- to 3.4-kb RNAs (UL37 and UL37M ORFs) that are present in small amounts only at IE times as well as an abundant 1.7-kb unspliced RNA that encodes the UL37 exon 1 (UL37X1) gene product.
Newly synthesized IE1-72 and IE2-86 localize to the PODs. While the punctate pattern of the IE2-86 protein persists, at 3 to 6 h postinfection (p.i.), both IE1-72 and POD-associated proteins become dispersed throughout the nucleus (5, 22, 24, 25). Several studies have shown that IE2-86 is able to localize to the PODs in the absence of IE1-72 but is not able to disrupt them (4, 5, 22). IE1-72 is required for disruption of the PODs, but since an IE1 deletion mutant virus (CR208) replicates well at high multiplicity (18, 19, 32), this event is not essential. It appears that even after IE1-72 has caused the dispersal of the PODs, these locations remain important for viral replication. The UL112-113 early gene proteins appear to colocalize with IE2-86 at the peripheries of the original POD sites beginning at about 6 h p.i., and these go on to form sites of viral DNA replication (3, 35). By 48 h p.i., there is a high level of viral DNA synthesis in the replication centers, and the majority of the viral genome is being transcribed.
Viral transcription is directed by the cellular RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), a multisubunit complex. The largest subunit of RNAP II contains a C-terminal domain (CTD), which in human cells consists of 52 repeats of the consensus heptapeptide sequence Tyr-Ser-Pro-Thr-Ser-Pro-Ser. The CTD is differentially phosphorylated primarily at the serine 2 and serine 5 positions, and the level of phosphorylation varies considerably during the transcription cycle (for reviews, see references 27, 30, and 37). Hypophosphorylated RNAP II (RNAP IIa) is recruited to the initiation complex, and the CTD is then phosphorylated to a hyperphosphorylated form (RNAP IIo). The phosphorylation of the serines in position 5 by cdk7/MAT-1/cyclin H (a component of the basal transcription factor complex TFIIH) is followed by the phosphorylation of the serines in position 2 by cdk9/cyclin T (also referred to as positive transcription elongation factor B [P-TEFb]), which is associated with the commitment of the RNAP II complex to elongation. RNAP IIa and IIo forms are in a dynamic equilibrium such that RNAP IIo needs to be dephosphorylated to the IIa form in order to engage in another round of transcription. The primary phosphatase is Fcp1, which is highly conserved and can remove phosphates from the CTD of RNAP IIo when it is engaged in transcription or free. Recently, other phosphatases have been discovered, including the small CTD phosphatases and Ssu72.
The prevailing hypothesis is that the CTD plays a regulatory role in all steps of transcription by serving as the binding domain and transporter of factors involved in RNA synthesis initiation, elongation, 5' capping, splicing, and cleavage/polyadenylation (for reviews, see references 8, 30, 34, and 38). It is believed that the differential recruitment and binding of specific factors that are involved in these processes are significantly influenced by the pattern of phosphorylation of the various Ser2 and Ser5 residues (and possibly by the ubiquitylation, glycosylation, and phosphorylation of other residues) within the 52 repeats. For example, the phosphorylation of the CTD at Ser5 is associated with the recruitment of the mRNA capping enzymes, and the phosphorylation of the CTD at Ser2 is linked to the recruitment of 3' RNA processing factors.
In a recent study, we used the drug roscovitine, which is a specific inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinases (cdk's) 1, 2, 5, 7, and 9 (7, 10, 13, 29, 45, 51), to examine the role of these kinases in viral replication (44). We found that addition of the drug at the beginning of the infection resulted in changes in the accumulation and processing of IE transcripts and inhibition of the expression of selected viral early gene products, viral DNA replication, and late gene expression. Roscovitine specifically affected the differential splicing and polyadenylation of the RNAs from both the IE1/IE2 and UL37 genes. The relative position of the sequences used for processing the HCMV unspliced UL37X1 RNA and spliced UL37 IE RNAs (47) is very similar to the position of the region between UL123 exon 4 and UL122 exon 5, which are used for the alternative cleavage/polyadenylation and splicing that generates the IE1-72 and IE2-86 RNAs, respectively. For both regions, the signals on the RNA for cleavage/polyadenylation overlap those for the downstream 3' splice acceptor site, with the cleavage/polyadenylation site being preferentially used to generate either IE1-72 or UL37X1 RNAs at IE times. However, in the presence of roscovitine, there was greater utilization of the downstream 3' splice acceptor site, yielding higher levels of the IE2-86 and spliced UL37 RNAs and corresponding lower levels of the IE1-72 or UL37X1 RNAs. We also showed that when roscovitine was added after the first 4 h of infection, the effects on IE gene expression were no longer observed. When it was added after 6 h, viral replication proceeded through the late phase but the viral titer remained low.
One possible explanation for the altered pattern of viral RNA processing was that the effects of the cdk inhibitor were related to the phosphorylation of the CTD of the large subunit of RNAP II by cdk7/MAT-1/cyclin H and cdk9/cyclin T. A recent paper showing that HCMV induces an intermediate form of phosphorylated RNAP II supports this idea (6). Those authors proposed that the CTD might be phosphorylated by the HCMV-encoded kinase UL97. However, their data showed that although the CTD can serve as a substrate for UL97 in vitro, RNAP II does not appear to be phosphorylated by this kinase in vivo.
In this study, we examine the effect of HCMV infection on the expression, activity, and localization of cdk7/MAT-1/cyclin H, cdk9/cyclin T1, and several forms of the large subunit of RNAP II at both early and late times during the infection. We show that during the course of the infection, there is an increase in cdk7 and cdk9 protein levels and kinase activity and in the amount of RNAP II that is phosphorylated on serine 2 and serine 5 within the CTD. At 48 h p.i., cdk7 and hypophosphorylated RNAP II localize to replication centers, cdk9 and Ser2-phosphorylated RNAP II are distributed in a punctate pattern throughout the nuclei, and Ser5-phosphorylated RNAP II appears in clusters at the peripheries of the viral replication centers. At early times, cdk9 localizes with input viral DNA. In addition, aggregates of cdk9 and cdk7 and a subset of Ser2-phosphorylated RNAP II colocalize with IE1/IE2 proteins adjacent to the PODs. Addition of the cdk inhibitor roscovitine at the time of infection results in decreased CTD phosphorylation in the infected cells and a decrease in the level of the hypophosphorylated RNAP II in both infected and mock-infected cells. In accord with our previous results regarding the effect of the cdk inhibitors on the processing and accumulation of the HCMV IE1/IE2 and UL37 IE transcripts, the decrease in CTD phosphorylation does not occur if the drug is added after 8 h p.i. These results suggest that the phosphorylation of the CTD is essential at early time points of the infection and that the required level of CTD phosphorylation for IE gene expression is established within 8 h.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell synchronization and infections. HFF (passage numbers 15 to 20) were synchronized in G0 phase by allowing them to grow to confluence as previously described (42). Three days after confluence, the cells were trypsinized, replated at a lower density to allow progression into the cell cycle, and infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3 to 5 with HCMV Towne or mock infected with tissue culture supernatants. At 6 h postplating/postinfection, the inoculum was replaced with fresh medium. At designated times p.i., 20 µM roscovitine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added to the medium. For experiments extending beyond 24 h, medium was replaced with fresh drug-containing medium at 24 h p.i. and 48 h p.i. The roscovitine stock solution was in dimethyl sulfoxide. Control samples were treated with appropriate volumes of dimethyl sulfoxide. At various times p.i., cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), scraped or trypsinized, and processed as described below.
Antibodies. We used cdk7 monoclonal antibody (MAb) MO-1 (BD Pharmingen, La Jolla, CA); ARNA3 (Chemicon, Temecula, CA); CH16.0, UL44, and UL57 MAbs (Goodwin Institute, Plantation, FL); cdk7 polyclonal Ab sc-529, cdk9 MAb sc-13130, cdk9 polyclonal Ab sc-484, MAT-1 polyclonal Ab sc-6234, MAT-1 MAb sc-13142, cyclin H MAb sc-1662, cyclin T1 polyclonal Ab sc-10750, ß-catenin MAb sc-7963, and PML MAb sc-966 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA); H5, H14, and 8WG16 MAbs (Covance, Berkeley, CA); ß-actin MAb (Sigma Aldrich); cyclin T1 MAb (Novocastra, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom); rat anti-BrdU (Accurate Chemicals & Scientific Corp., Westbury, NY); goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG)-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) and goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA); goat anti-mouse IgM-HRP, donkey anti-rat IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), goat anti-rabbit IgG-Cy3, and normal rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA); normal mouse IgM, IgG, IgG1, and IgG2b (Zymed, San Francisco, CA); and FITC- or tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL).
Western blots and immunoprecipitations. For Western blot analyses, cells were lysed in Laemmli reducing sample buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 0.2% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 10% glycerol, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM leupeptin, 100 mM pepstatin, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 mM ß-glycerophosphate). The lysates were then sonicated briefly to shear the DNA, and protein content was determined by Bradford assay. Proteins from an equivalent number of cells were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose. Membranes were stained with amido black to assess protein loading in each lane. The blots were blocked with 5% nonfat dried milk in TBST (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20) and incubated with primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution as follows: cdk7 MAb, 1:500, cdk9 MAb, 1:250; MAT-1 MAb, 1:500; cyclin T1 MAb, 1:250; CH16.0 MAb, 1:14,000; RNAP II MAb ARNA3, 1:300; CTD Ser2 MAb H5, 1:500; CTD Ser5 MAb H14, 1:1,000; CTD MAb 8WG16, 1:500; ß-actin MAb, 1:10,000; and ß-catenin MAb, 1:500. The ß-actin MAb and ß-catenin MAb were used as controls for protein loading. Following three washes with TSBT, blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated immunoglobulin-specific antibodies and diluted 1:2,000 (anti-IgG) or 1:10,000 (anti-IgM). After the washing in TBST, proteins were detected using SuperSignal chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
For immunoprecipitations (IP), 0.8 to 1.2 µg of polyclonal antibody was coupled per µl of protein A-Sepharose beads with dimethyl pimelimidate dihydrochloride. Cells were lysed in immunoprecipitation buffer (100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% IGEPAL CA-630 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 1x protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche Chemicals, Indianapolis, IN], and the phosphatase inhibitors 50 mM sodium fluoride, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 5 mM ß-glycerophosphate). Empirically determined amounts of antibody-coupled beads (2 to 8 µg antibodies per IP) were used for immunoprecipitation of the various proteins. Lysates and antibody-coupled beads were incubated for 4 h or overnight at 4°C. Immunocomplexes were washed in IP buffer and used in kinase assays or boiled in reducing sample buffer prior to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting.
Bacterial production of GST-CTD. Bacteria harboring a glutathione S-transferase (GST)-CTD expression vector were a gift from William Dynan, and the protein was produced as previously described with minor modifications (36). Briefly, bacterial cultures were grown in 5 liters of LB-ampicillin. At an optical density at 600 nm of 0.4 to 0.6, GST-CTD expression was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) at 30°C for 16 h. The cell pellet was collected by centrifugation at 4,000 x g. The cells were lysed in 20 ml lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM KCl, 1% Triton X-100, 20 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 100 µg/ml lysozyme) and incubated on ice for 30 min; DNA was sheared by sonication for 2 min in 30-second pulses. The lysate was centrifuged at 6,800 x g, and the supernatant was incubated with glutathione Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) for 6 h at 4°C. The beads were washed three times with wash buffer (100 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% IGEPAL CA-630, and 1x protease inhibitor cocktail). The final wash was with kinase reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol). GST-CTD was eluted with 50 mM glutathione solution in kinase reaction buffer (pH 8.0). The purified protein was quantified by silver staining of a polyacrylamide gel and was stored in aliquots at 80°C.
Kinase assays.
Kinase reactions were carried out with 0.1 µg of GST-CTD per reaction. The kinase complexes were immunoprecipitated by incubating cell lysates with 4 to 6 µg of polyclonal antibody for 4 h at 4°C. The reaction mix (130 µl), consisting of kinase reaction buffer, GST-CTD, 50 µM ATP, and 12 µCi of [
-32P]ATP, was added to the Sepharose beads with the immunocomplexes. Reactions were carried out at 37°C for 30 min with mixing of the beads at frequent intervals to prevent settling. The reactions were stopped by the addition of 4x Laemmli buffer and boiled for 5 min. The entire contents of the reactions except the beads were loaded onto an 8% polyacrylamide gel and separated by electrophoresis. The gel was fixed for 5 min, dried, and exposed to X-ray film.
Immunofluorescence. Cells were infected as described above with HCMV Towne or the IE1 deletion virus CR208 (a gift from Edward Mocarski) or mock infected and plated on sterile glass coverslips. At specified time points, the coverslips were washed in PBS and fixed either with ice-cold methanol for 10 min or with ambient-temperature 2% paraformaldehyde solution in PBS for 20 min. Cells were processed as described before (43). Paraformaldehyde-fixed cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min or treated with 20°C acetone for 2 min. Following the washes, the cells were blocked in 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 30 min. Specific antibodies diluted in blocking solution were used to stain the cells. The dilutions were as follows: cdk7 MAb, 1:50; cdk9 MAb, 1:50; cdk9 polyclonal Ab, 1:50; MAT-1 MAb, 1:50; PML MAb, 1:25; CH16.0 MAb, 1:1,000; RNAP II MAb ARNA3, 1:50; CTD phospho-Ser2 MAb H5, 1:50; CTD phospho-Ser5 MAb H14, 1:100; CTD MAb 8WG16, 1:50; UL44 MAb, 1:1,000; and UL57 MAb, 1:500. As controls, the slides were dually stained with each specific antibody and a purified normal mouse IgG, mouse IgM, or rabbit IgG. After three washes with PBS, the coverslips were incubated with an FITC- or TRITC-conjugated, goat anti-mouse isotype-specific secondary antibody diluted 1:50 or a goat anti-rabbit IgG-Cy3 secondary antibody diluted 1:600 and Hoechst dye. Coverslips were washed three times and mounted with SlowFade mounting solution (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) onto glass slides. Images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope and Photometrics CoolSnap fx charge-coupled-device camera with Metamorph software. Confocal images were captured at the UCSD Cancer Center Digital Imaging Shared Resource using a Deltavision microscope and SoftWorx software.
BrdU-labeled virus production, infection, and immunofluorescence.
Production of BrdU-labeled HCMV Towne virus and infections were performed as previously described (41). Briefly, confluent G0-phase-synchronized HFFs were trypsinized and infected at an MOI of 0.05 with HCMV Towne. The medium was replaced the next day. At day 6 (
90% cytopathic effect), the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing 10 µM BrdU (Sigma), and the cells were protected from light thereafter. On day 8, additional BrdU was added to the medium, and the viral supernatant was harvested the following day. The titer of the virus was determined by a standard plaque assay.
Two hours prior to infection, confluent G0-phase-synchronized HFFs were trypsinized and seeded onto coverslips. The cells were incubated on ice 30 min prior to being infected at an MOI of 3 with the BrdU-labeled Towne HCMV or tissue culture supernatant. The cells were incubated on ice for an additional 30 min before the medium was replaced and cells were transferred to 37°C. Immunofluorescence was performed as described above with the following modifications. After completion of the staining for cdk9, cells were denatured with 4 N HCl for 10 min, followed by three 5-min washes in PBS. The cells were blocked with 10% normal donkey serum in PBS for 30 min. The BrdU-specific antibody was diluted in blocking solution at 1:50. A nonspecific rat IgG was used as a control. The FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rat secondary antibody was diluted 1:200 in blocking solution that contained Hoechst dye.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Localization of differentially phosphorylated forms RNAP II in infected and mock-infected cells. RNAP II assembles in the transcription initiation complex in its hypophosphorylated form. The phosphorylation of the serines at position 5 within the CTD is associated with the recruitment of the enzymes involved in the addition of the 7-methyl G cap to the RNA and initiation of transcription. Commitment of the RNAP II complex to elongation follows phosphorylation of the serines at position 2 within the CTD, which is also associated with the recruitment of factors involved in 3' RNA processing. Since the alteration of host protein localization is one of several means by which HCMV furthers its replication at the expense of the host cell, we examined the distribution of the various phosphorylated forms of RNAP II in the infected cells. We were particularly interested in the localization of RNAP II relative to the viral replication centers since high levels of viral RNA are synthesized after the onset of viral DNA synthesis. In addition, the above results showed that the levels of phosphorylated RNAP II were significantly higher in the infected cells at 48 h p.i. than in the mock-infected cells.
To visualize both the viral DNA replication centers and RNAP II, the cells were dually stained at 48 h p.i. with antibodies specific for the different forms of RNAP II as well as with antibodies to the viral DNA replication proteins UL44 and UL57. With the antibody ARNA3, which detects all species of RNAP II, staining in the infected cells was concentrated in the replication center, with a small amount visible in the nucleus outside of the replication center (Fig. 2, panels 1 to 3), while in the mock-infected cells, the staining was diffuse throughout the nucleus (panel 4). In contrast, the confocal images revealed that the RNAP II recognized by the antibody 8WG16 (hypophosphorylated RNAP II and RNAP II with only Ser5 phosphorylated) was localized in the infected cells at the periphery of the replication center in small aggregates (panels 5 to 7) and more diffusely distributed with a punctate appearance in the mock-infected cells (panel 8). The pattern of staining with the H14 antibody (specific for the Ser5-phosphorylated CTD) resembled the 8WG16 staining in that the localization was at the periphery of the replication center in the infected cells (panels 9 to 11) and more diffusely distributed and punctate in the mock-infected cells (panel 12). This was expected since 8WG16 recognizes both hypophosphorylated CTD and a subset of Ser5-phosphorylated CTD that is not phosphorylated at Ser2. However, with H14, some staining in the region of the nucleus distant from the replication center was also visible in the infected cells, which may represent RNAP II that has the CTD phosphorylated at both Ser5 and Ser2. The H5 antibody showed that the Ser2-phosphorylated form of RNAP II was distributed throughout the nucleus, with a punctate appearance in both the infected (panels 13 to 15) and mock-infected (panel 16) cells. Panels 17 to 23 are controls in which the infected cells were stained with a specific antibody along with a nonspecific IgG or IgM antibody that matched the second antibody used in the dual staining. Taken together, these results suggest that in the infected cells, the initiation of viral (and possibly cellular) transcription, as indicated by Ser5 phosphorylation of RNAP II, may occur in clusters at the peripheries of the replication centers and be physically separate from the major region of viral DNA synthesis.
|
|
|
|
The kinase activity and amount of cdk7, cdk9, and associated proteins are upregulated in infected cells. The changes in the phosphorylation of RNAP II and the effect of roscovitine in the infected cells suggested that the viral infection might also affect the levels, activity, or localization of cdk7 and cdk9. cdk7 is found in association with cyclin H or in a complex with cyclin H and MAT-1 to form the cdk-activating kinase. These three proteins are also part of the multisubunit complex TFIIH, which is an RNAP II transcription initiation factor. To assess the effect of the infection on cdk7 and the proteins that associate with this kinase, cells that were synchronized in G0 were released into G1 at the time of infection and then harvested at various times p.i. By Western blot analysis, we found that an increase in the amount of cdk7 could be detected between 8 and 24 h p.i. in the infected cells, and this level continued to increase as the infection progressed (Fig. 6). MAT-1 and cyclin H displayed a similar trend, although the increase in MAT-1 was greater than that of cyclin H.
|
To assess whether the increased cdk7 and MAT-1 remained in association with each other during the infection, we performed IP experiments with antibodies to the individual proteins. Lysates of the infected and mock-infected cells were prepared at the 48-h p.i. time point and immunoprecipitated with cdk7 antibody or with control IgG coupled to protein A-Sepharose beads. The immunoprecipitates were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting with antibodies to both cdk7 and MAT-1. The Western blot of the cdk7 immunoprecipitate (Fig. 7A) shows that both MAT-1 and cdk7 are in a complex, and there appears to be no free MAT-1 in the post-IP supernatant. As expected, neither protein was immunoprecipitated with the control IgG. In a reciprocal experiment, the immunoprecipitation of MAT-1 also brings down cdk7 from the lysates of both mock- and virus-infected cells that were obtained at 48 h p.i. However, cdk7 is still present in the MAT-1-depleted lysate, suggesting that cdk7 is present in excess. Taken together, these data suggest that MAT-1 is not found in a free form in either infected or mock-infected cells. In these experiments, we could not assess whether cyclin H was present in the complexes, as the antibody has low affinity in immunoprecipitation experiments, and there is a high level of background staining of the Western blot following immunoprecipitation with either MAT-1 or cdk7.
|
To determine whether the increase in the protein level of the CTD kinases that began at 24 h p.i. corresponds to their activity, bacterially expressed GST-CTD was used as a substrate for in vitro kinase assays with lysates obtained at 48 h p.i. Figure 7C shows that in accord with the increased levels of cdk7 and cdk9 in the infected cells at 48 h p.i., there was also a significant increase in the kinase activities.
Cdk7 and MAT-1 are localized primarily in replication centers, and cdk9 is distributed throughout the nuclei of infected cells. Since the above results showed that there was an increase in both the number of complexes containing cdk7 and MAT-1 and the associated kinase activity, we wanted to determine if their localization was also altered by the HCMV infection. Visualization of the immunofluorescence by confocal microscopy of vertical optical sections documented that cdk7 and MAT-1 were uniformly distributed in the nuclei of mock-infected cells (Fig. 8A, panels 1 to 3), while at 48 h p.i., they accumulated primarily in the viral replication centers of infected cells (panels 5 to 7). The increased intensity of the cdk7 and MAT-1 signals in the infected cells correlated with the Western blot results. The presence of cdk7 and MAT-1 in the replication centers was confirmed by dual staining of the slides with antibodies to cdk7 or MAT-1 and the viral replication protein UL44 or UL57, respectively (panels 8 to 10 and 11 to 13, respectively). However, the cdk7 and MAT-1 staining was not limited to the replication centers, as both proteins were also observed in the nuclear region at the peripheries of the replication centers.
|
Cdk7 and cdk9 kinase activities are elevated at early times in the infection. As shown above, the level of phosphorylated RNAP II was greater in the infected cells at 8 h p.i. than in the mock-infected cells. However, at this time point the amount of cdk7 and cdk9 in the infected cells was comparable to that in the mock-infected cells. To determine whether the kinase activity was higher in the infected cells at this early time point, we immunoprecipitated the lysates with antibody to cdk7 or cdk9 and assayed the phosphorylation of bacterially expressed GST-CTD in an in vitro kinase assay. Figure 9A shows that the kinase activities of both cdk7 and cdk9 were higher in the infected cells. The Western blot of the immunoprecipitates confirmed that the levels of cdk7 and cdk9 were equivalent in the mock-infected and infected cells at this time (Fig. 9B).
|
In order to determine if transcriptionally active RNAP II is being recruited to and accumulates at the immediate early sites of viral gene transcription, we examined the distribution of RNAP II with the CTD phosphorylated on Ser2 (H5 Ab) relative to the IE proteins (Fig. 10). CH16.0, an antibody that detects both IE1 and IE2, was used to track IE protein localization. Confocal microscopy revealed that a subset of Ser2-phosphorylated RNAP IIo localized near the IE protein aggregates (Fig. 10A, panels 1 to 3). Within a single visual plane, the majority of the IE aggregates were localized adjacent to the punctate spots containing RNAP II with the Ser2-phosphorylated CTD, and occasionally they were partially or completely colocalized (panel 3). In the mock-infected cells, the Ser2-phosphorylated RNAP IIo appeared as punctate spots throughout the nucleus, and as expected, IE1/IE2 staining was not detected (Fig. 10A, panel 4).
|
To obtain additional evidence that components of the host cell transcriptional machinery accumulate at sites of IE transcription, we examined whether the input viral genome colocalized with the cdk9 aggregates. Cells were infected with BrdU-labeled HCMV Towne and visualized by dual immunostaining with a rat anti-BrdU antibody and a cdk9 antibody. By confocal imaging, a clear colocalization between the viral genome and the cdk9 aggregates was observed (Fig. 10A, panels 16 to 18). In a single visual plane, there were some viral genomes that did not colocalize with the cdk9 aggregates, but these were usually outside of the nucleus. No BrdU signal or cdk9 aggregates were detected in mock-infected cells (panel 19). It should be noted that the diffuse background nuclear staining for cdk9 and the Hoechst dye seen in panels 17 to 19 are the result of an added HCl denaturation step during the immunostaining. Figure 10B shows immunostaining controls where one of the specific antibodies in the dually stained panels shown in Fig. 10A was replaced with purified mouse IgM, rat IgG, rabbit IgG, or isotype-specific mouse IgG.
cdk9 localizes adjacent to sites that correspond to the PODs in infected cells prior to dispersal. To confirm that the above results were consistent with the previous studies showing that the PODs are the sites of viral IE transcription, the localization of the cdk9 aggregates in relation to the PODs was examined by confocal microscopy (Fig. 11). Cells were costained with the rabbit anti-cdk9 antibody and an anti-PML MAb, a standard marker for the PODs. In mock-infected cells, the PML staining displayed a prominent speckled pattern in the nucleus, and costaining with cdk9 showed that cdk9 spots were seemingly randomly oriented with respect to the PODs (panels 1 to 4). The trend in the infected cells was that the cdk9 aggregation andthe maintenance of PML at the PODs are mutually exclusive (panels 5 to 7). The cell on the left in panels 5 to 7 shows the dispersal of PML and the presence of cdk9 aggregates, and the cell on the right shows the typical PML speckles marking the position of the PODs and the absence of cdk9 aggregates. In the rare case that an infected cell exhibited some cdk9 aggregation before dispersal of the PML, the majority of the cdk9 aggregates were not colocalized at the remaining PODs, although some cdk9 did appear to be adjacent to the PODs. A representative example of this is shown in panels 8 to 11.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interestingly, the infected cells do not show a noticeable increase in the amount of cdk7 or cdk9 until 24 h p.i. However, their in vitro activities, as well as the level of the hyperphosphorylated form of the RNAP II CTD, increase at earlier times. This suggests that the initial increased kinase activity may be due to other virus-induced changes. It is possible that a viral protein functions as a regulatory subunit for either of these kinases or that the virus induces an association of the kinases with another cellular protein to facilitate the phosphorylation of the RNAP II CTD during the infection. This is consistent with the recent observation that the RNAP II CTD is phosphorylated in herpes simplex virus 1-infected cells by a complex that contains cdk9 and ICP22 (12). Alternatively, the virus may induce relocalization and/or recruitment of cdk7 and cdk9 to RNAP II. Our data showing that concentrated aggregates of these kinases form in infected cells at the site of IE transcription support this hypothesis.
Previously, we found that infection of cells in the presence of the cdk inhibitor roscovitine altered the pattern of processing for both the UL122-123 and UL37 transcripts (44). Normally, the first cleavage/polyadenylation site is preferentially used to generate IE1-72 or UL37X1 RNAs, but in the presence of roscovitine, there appeared to be suppression of the first cleavage/polyadenylation site and enhanced utilization of the adjacent downstream 3' splice acceptor site. As a result, there were lower levels of the IE1-72 or UL37X1 RNAs and higher levels of the IE2-86 and spliced UL37 RNAs. We proposed that these changes were related to the phosphorylation of the RNAP II CTD, primarily by cdk7/cyclin H and cdk9/cyclin T1 (44). In support of this hypothesis, we show here that when roscovitine is present at the beginning of the infection, the level of CTD phosphorylation is significantly decreased in the infected cells, most notably the phosphorylation of Ser2; there is no change in the mock-infected cells. For the Ser5-phosphorylated form, it appears that inhibition of cdk primarily prevents the increase observed in the infected cells, at least during the first 12 h. In the case of the Ser2-phosphorylated form, the levels are actually lower in the infected cells than in the mock-infected cells. One possibility for this result is that the virus either brings into the cell or activates a phosphatase that preferentially removes the phosphate from Ser2 within the CTD. In the absence of roscovitine, the action of cdk9/cyclin T1 may counter this dephosphorylation. It is tempting to speculate that the reduction in Ser2 phosphorylation of the CTD is associated with decreased recruitment of the cleavage/polyadenylation factors, but further experiments will be required to determine if this is the case.
The effects of roscovitine on the hypophosphorylated RNAP II also differ in the infected and mock-infected cells. Here, there is a more rapid decrease in the mock-infected cells than in the infected cells during the first 8 h, although by 12 h, the levels are comparable. This loss of the hypophosphorylated RNAP IIa in the presence of roscovitine may be related to some inhibitory effect on transcription, as others have observed a similar loss of RNAP IIa when cells are exposed to UV light,
-amanitin, or actinomycin D (33, 39, 40). It is possible that the rate of degradation of the hypophosphorylated RNAP II in the infected cells is comparable to that in the mock-infected cells, but the dephosphorylation of the Ser2-phosphorylated form by a viral-infection-associated phosphatase initially compensates for this. Alternatively, inhibition of the cdk's may lead to differential degradation of the hypophosphorylated and hyperphosphorylated forms of RNAP II in the infected and mock-infected cells. These two possibilities are not mutually exclusive, and there may be some combination of enhanced phosphatase activity and altered stability. In-depth studies of protein stability and assays of phosphatase activity may help resolve these possibilities, and these experiments are in progress.
In accord with our previous study of the effect of roscovitine on IE gene expression (44), the decrease in CTD phosphorylation does not occur if the drug is added after 8 h p.i. There are several possibilities for this result. One explanation is that the phosphorylation of RNAP II necessary for programmed viral IE gene expression is complete by 8 h p.i., and thus inhibitors of cdk7 and cdk9 no longer have an effect. Alternatively, the kinases may no longer be accessible to the inhibitor. In addition, if there is a virus-associated phosphatase that makes the infected cells more sensitive to cdk inhibition, it may be present for only a limited period of time at the beginning of the infection. All of these possibilities are currently being investigated.
Taken together, the studies presented here suggest that the in vivo increase of CTD phosphorylation is due to the upregulated cdk7 and cdk9 kinase activities. However, although these two kinases are believed to be responsible for most of the CTD phosphorylation, it remains possible that other kinases are also involved in CTD phosphorylation in the infected cell. These results also do not preclude the possibility that there is cdk-dependent modification of other proteins that have an impact on the posttranscriptional processing of the IE transcripts. Multiple factors are involved in the splicing and cleavage/polyadenylation of RNA transcripts, and a change in the abundance, activity, or localization of any of the factors due to alteration of their phosphorylation state could affect the balance of transcripts produced. For example, it has recently been shown that the splicing factor ASF/SF2 is hypophosphorylated and presumably less active early in the infection (2).
In addition to identifying specific components of the host transcriptional machinery that are upregulated during the infection, we also determined the nuclear localization of these components at times of viral IE and late transcription. Ishov et al. (22) provided a model for the IE transcription environment based on their results showing that the viral input genome, IE transcripts, and IE proteins all localize at the PODs and that the IE transcripts move towards the spliceosome assembly factor domains. They hypothesized that either the incoming viral genome is required to localize at preexisting transcriptional environments in the host cell or essential transcription factors must be recruited to the input viral genome. Our data suggest that both events take place. Figure 12 summarizes the findings from Ishov et al. (22) with respect to the IE transcription environment and extends their model based on the results of our studies. We find that that the transcription elongation factor cdk9 forms aggregates that colocalize with the IE proteins as early as 2 h p.i. As the infection proceeds during the next few hours, the aggregates of cdk7 and cdk9 increase in size, indicating that both CTD kinases are further recruited to these transcription sites. Since continued IE transcription requires recruitment of the CTD kinases to the sites of viral transcription within the first hours of infection, it is reasonable to assume that the required phosphorylation of RNAP II for synthesis of the IE RNAs may be complete by 8 h p.i. This would also be consistent with the finding that the IE protein spots are localized near the Ser2-phosphorylated RNAP II.
|
The studies presented here provide another example of the ingenious ways that CMV subverts the host cell for its own needs. Deciphering the mechanisms governing the coupling of RNA transcription and processing and the role of differential CTD phosphorylation in the regulation of the various steps involved in mRNA synthesis is an active area of research. An understanding of how the virus commandeers the transcriptional machinery not only may advance our knowledge of viral pathogenesis but also may help elucidate the mechanisms underlying regulated gene expression.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH grants CA73490 and CA34729.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|