Journal of Virology, January 2005, p. 1339-1341, Vol. 79, No. 2
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.2.1339-1341.2005
| LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
|
|
|---|
Claims as to VP3's tumor cell-specific nuclear targeting and proapoptotic activities are based thus far on analysis with nonisogenic cell pairs (7). Noteborn and colleagues in particular have performed a number of studies comparing VP3's properties in transformed and nontransformed cells of diverse types and origins (e.g., SAOS-2 human osteosarcoma cells compared with VH10 normal human skin fibroblasts) (1, 2, 10, 11), making it difficult to conclude that the apparent differential properties of VP3 in tumor or transformed cells are attributable to their tumorigenic status rather than to any number of other differences between the cell types or species, etc., used.
A recent study by Wadia et al. (9) reported that VP3 contains a "concentration-dependent" nuclear targeting signal (nuclear localization sequence [NLS]), rather than a "tumorigenic selective NLS" based on a comparison of ras-transformed mouse 3T3 cells and primary human fibroblasts. Transfection experiments carried out with increasing amounts of DNA led to the conclusion that better expression in tumor cells enabled greater nuclear accumulation, based on arbitrary scoring of microscopic images (9).
Claims as to VP3's tumor-specific nuclear targeting ability or otherwise need to be based on quantitative analyses of isogenic cell pairs at the single-cell level, where cell-cell variation in terms of actual expression can be measured rather than assumed according to the amount of transfecting DNA added. As a first step toward this goal, we have analyzed VP3's nuclear targeting abilities in two different isogenic cell pairs, thus enabling definitive comparisons between its activity in cells identical in genotype except for their transformed or nontransformed status. The lines used were (i) CV-1 African green monkey kidney cells (nontransformed) together with the simian virus 40-transformed derivative COS-7 line (3) and (ii) the tumorigenic SAOS-2 cell line, mutated in the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor gene product, together with the nontransformed SR40 counterpart derived by transfection of SAOS-2 with the full-length Rb cDNA (4, 6).
Cells were transfected to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) or the VP3-GFP fusion constructs shown in Fig. 1A and imaged live 16 h later by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). In contrast to previous reports (1, 2, 10, 11), but consistent with the report of Wadia et al. (9), full-length VP3 was found to confer nuclear localization of GFP in both nontransformed cell types (CV-1 and SR40), as well as in the corresponding isogenic COS-7 and SAOS-2 transformed lines (Fig. 1B). The transformed lines, however, accumulated GFP-VP3(1-121) to a two times greater extent than did their nontransformed counterparts (P < 0.002), as revealed by determination of the nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio (Fn/c), with GFP-VP3(1-121) accumulating to levels about 70- and 50-fold greater than those in the cytoplasm of COS-7 and SAOS-2 cells, respectively (Fig. 1C). Thus, VP3 localizes to a greater extent in the nuclei of transformed compared to nontransformed cells.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Tumor cell-specific nuclear accumulation of VP3. (A) GFP-VP3 fusion proteins expressed from transfection constructs used in this study. (B) CLSM images of SAOS-2 and SR40 cells 16 h after transfection (with 1 µg of plasmid DNA per 6 x 105 cells and the Mirus TransitIT-LT1 transfection agent) to express the indicated GFP fusion constructs. (C) Quantitative analysis of the levels of nuclear accumulation (Fn/c after subtraction of background fluorescence), as determined by image analysis with the Image J public-domain software as previously described (5), from CLSM images such as those in panel B for SAOS-2 and SR40 cells and COS-7 and CV-1 cells. Results are the mean ± the standard error of the mean [n = 43 for SAOS-2 and SR40 cells and n = 20 for COS-7 and CV-1 cells for all constructs except GFP-VP3(1-73), where n = 7 and n = 15 for SAOS-2 and SR40 cells and COS-7 and CV-1 cells, respectively]. Statistically significant differences (Student's t test) between transformed and nontransformed isogenic cells are indicated. (D) Analysis of the levels of nuclear accumulation for GFP-VP3(1-121) (left) and GFP-VP3(74-121) (right) in low (Fn = <20)-, medium (Fn = 20 to 40)-, and high (Fn = >40)-expression SAOS-2 and SR40 cells (data from panel C). Results are the mean ± the standard error of the mean. NES, nuclear export signal.
|
To test whether activity of the tumor cell-specific NLS was responsive to the cellular expression level, as postulated by Wadia et al. (9), single-cell results for SAOS-2 and SR40 cells were grouped into low-, medium-, and high-expression cells on the basis of the VP3 expression level as determined by image analysis (Fig. 1D). No relationship was apparent between the level of expression and the extent of nuclear accumulation of GFP-VP3(1-121) (left panel) and GFP-VP3(74-121) (right panel) in either transformed SAOS-2 cells or nontransformed SR40 cells. Rather than high expression resulting in increased nuclear accumulation, the trend in the case of GFP-VP3(74-121) in SAOS-2 cells at least was that increasing levels of expression correlated with reduced nuclear accumulation (Fig. 1D).
On the basis of this quantitative analysis of isogenic transformed-nontransformed cell pairs, we conclude that chicken anemia virus VP3 possesses a specialized NLS (within residues 74 to 121) that shows high specificity for transformed cells. The only nuclear targeting signal with comparable specificity for a particular type of cell is the 45-amino-acid "developmentally regulated" NLS from adenovirus E1a protein (8), which functions in nuclear targeting only early (up to the early neurula stage) in Xenopus embryonic development. Future studies should establish the mechanistic basis of the action of the VP3 tumor cell-specific NLS in transformed cells as opposed to normal cells.
Center for Developmental Biology |
|
|---|
|
I. K. H. Poon C. Oro M. M. Dias J.-P. Zhang ![]() D. A. Jans* Nuclear Signaling Laboratory Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Monash University, P.O. Box 13D Monash, Victoria 3800, Australia
|
||||||
| * Phone: 00613/99053778, Fax: 00613/99054699, E-mail: David.Jans{at}med.monash.edu.au |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»