Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, January 2005, p. 1337-1338, Vol. 79, No. 2
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.2.1337-1338.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Relevance of Apoptin's Integrity for Its Functional Behavior

LETTER
Wadia et al. (
7) recently claimed that apoptin, a virally encoded
protein with tumor-selective apoptosis activity, contains a
concentration-dependent nuclear localization signal (NLS) that
is not tumor selective as previously reported (
1,
2,
4). Their
Fig.
1B shows, however, that under all the conditions tested,
nuclear import of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-apoptin
70-121 remains 200 to 300% higher in tumor cells than in primary cells.
The apparent concentration dependence of apoptin's NLS is intriguing.
We agree with their interpretation that presentation of multiple
apoptin NLS domains by a molecular aggregate could generate
more efficient nuclear trafficking than NLS exposure at a single
site. This result is, however, somewhat academic, as full-length
apoptin can only be harvested as a multimer from live cells,
with a dissociation rate constant (
koff) that is so slow that
it can hardly be measured, whereas the C-terminal fragment forms
only monomers (
5,
9). This could explain why Wadia et al. could
measure a cooperative, concentration-dependent effect of apoptin's
NLS, as they used a GFP fusion of a C-terminal fragment of apoptin
lacking the multimerization domain (
5). Had they used full-length
apoptin, all the NLS sequences would likely have been clustered,
resulting in effective nuclear import over all concentration
ranges. Nevertheless, we suggest caution in using GFP-apoptin
fusions in functional studies. For example, fusion of GFP to
full-length apoptin results in increased levels of nuclear GFP-apoptin
versus wild-type apoptin in primary cells (Fig.
1A).
The current hypothesis is that nuclear trafficking and tumor-specific
phosphorylation of apoptin at Thr108 are essential for induction
of apoptosis (
3,
6,
8). Wadia et al. reported a failure to detect
phosphorylation with radioactive labeling of GFP-apoptin
70-121;
we do not know why this is so, as phosphorylation of full-length
apoptin has been thoroughly documented by the use of mass spectrometry
and a phospho-specific antibody (
6). Our preliminary experiments
suggest that abolishing the phosphorylation site of apoptin
does not significantly disrupt its nuclear import in tumor cells.
In attempting to address this observation with a GFP-apoptin
70-121 T108A mutant, Wadia et al. used a construct that is not phospho-null
in vivo; in our hands, as Thr108 is the last in a run of three
threonine residues, the adjacent Thr107 becomes opportunistically
phosphorylated instead, which yields the same phenotype. Mutation
at both positions 107 and 108 is required to eliminate phosphorylation
and function. As Fig.
1B indicates, phosphorylation of apoptin
is required for apoptosis induced by its C-terminal death domain
(
3); a control experiment confirms that the apoptosis-competent
fragment is phosphorylated on Thr108 in vivo (Fig.
1C).
Apoptin's tumor-specific activity does not result from a single characteristic. Its multimerization behavior, its potential to be phosphorylated, its cooperativity in nuclear trafficking, and many of its other physical, chemical, and functional activities all shape the mechanism by which it induces tumor-specific apoptosis. Extrapolations of results obtained from studies that disrupt apoptin's integrity should therefore be approached with caution.

REFERENCES
1 - Cheng, C.-M., S.-P. Huang, Y. F. Chang, W.-Y. Chung, and C.-Y. You. 2003. The viral death protein Apoptin interacts with Hippi, the protein interactor of Huntingtin-interacting protein 1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 305:359-364.[CrossRef][Medline]
2 - Danen-van Oorschot, A. A. A. M., D. Fischer, J. M. Grimbergen, B. Klein, S.-M. Zhuang, J. H. F. Falkenburg, C. Backendorf, P. H. A. Quax, A. J. Van der Eb, and M. H. M. Noteborn. 1997. Apoptin induces apoptosis in human transformed and malignant cells but not in normal cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:5843-5847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Danen-van Oorschot, A. A. A. M., Y.-H. Zhang, S. R. Leliveld, J. L. Rohn, M. C. M. J. Seelen, M. W. Bolk, A. Van Zon, S. J. Erkeland, J.-P. Abrahams, D. Mumberg, and M. H. M. Noteborn. 2003. Importance of nuclear localization of apoptin for tumor-specific induction of apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 278:27729-27736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Guelen, L., H. Paterson, J. Gaeken, M. Meyers, F. Farzaneh, and M. Tavassoli. 2004. TAT-apoptin is efficiently delivered and induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Oncogene 23:1153-1165.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Leliveld, S. R., Y.-H. Zhang, L. R. Rohn, M. H. M. Noteborn, and J. P. Abrahams. 2003. Apoptin induces tumor-specific apoptosis as globular multimer. J. Biol. Chem. 278:9042-9051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Rohn, J. L., Y.-H. Zhang, R. I. J. M. Aalbers, N. Otto, J. Den Hertog, N. Henriquez, C. J. H. Van de Velde, P. J. K. Kuppen, D. Mumberg, P. Donner, and M. H. M. Noteborn. 2002. A tumor-specific kinase activity regulates the viral death protein Apoptin. J. Biol. Chem. 277:50820-50827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Wadia, J. S., M. V. Wagner, S. A. Ezhevsky, and S. F. Dowdy. 2004. Apoptin/VP3 contains a concentration-dependent nuclear localization signal (NLS), not a tumorigenic selective NLS. J. Virol. 78:6077-6078.[Free Full Text]
8 - Zhang, Y.-H., K. Kooistra, A. M. Pietersen, J. L. Rohn, and M. H. M. Noteborn. 2004. Activation of the tumor-specific death effector apoptin and its kinase by an N-terminal determinant of simian virus 40 large T antigen. J. Virol. 78:9965-9976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Zhang, Y.-H., S. R. Leliveld, K. Kooistra, C. Molenaar, J. L. Rohn, H. J. Tanke, J. P. Abrahams, and M. H. M. Noteborn. 2003. Recombinant Apoptin multimers kill tumor cells but are not-toxic and epitope-shielded in a normal-cell-specific fashion. Exp. Cell Res. 289:36-46.[CrossRef][Medline]
| | | | | |
J. L. Rohn
Y.-H. Zhang
S. R. Leliveld
A. A. A. M. Danen-van Oorschot
N. V. Henriquez
J. P. Abrahams
M. H. M. Noteborn*
BFSC-Leiden Institute for Chemistry Leiden University Einsteinweg 55 2333 CC Leiden The Netherlands
|
| | | | | |
* Phone: 31 71 527 4414,Fax: 31 71 527 4357,E-mail: m.noteborn{at}chem.leidenuniv.nl |
Journal of Virology, January 2005, p. 1337-1338, Vol. 79, No. 2
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.2.1337-1338.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Heilman, D. W., Teodoro, J. G., Green, M. R.
(2006). Apoptin Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling Is Required for Cell Type-Specific Localization, Apoptosis, and Recruitment of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome to PML Bodies.. J. Virol.
80: 7535-7545
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Maddika, S., Booy, E. P., Johar, D., Gibson, S. B., Ghavami, S., Los, M.
(2005). Cancer-specific toxicity of apoptin is independent of death receptors but involves the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and the release of mitochondrial cell-death mediators by a Nur77-dependent pathway. J. Cell Sci.
118: 4485-4493
[Abstract]
[Full Text]