Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, October 2005, p. 12584-12591, Vol. 79, No. 19
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.19.12584-12591.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received 13 May 2005/ Accepted 5 July 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
IN is a three-domain protein comprised of the N-terminal domain (NTD), catalytic core domain, and C-terminal domain (CTD) as defined by results of limited proteolysis (22), functional complementation (21, 29, 41, 45), and structural biology (12, 13, 46, 48). The NTD (HIV-1 residues 1 to 49) contains an invariant HHCC amino acid sequence motif that binds zinc (6, 8, 9, 18), and zinc binding contributes to IN multimerization and catalytic function (34, 49). It was previously determined that the substitution of Asn for His-12 (the first His in the HHCC motif) rendered HIV-1 replication defective (23), although zinc binding (8), 3' processing, and DNA strand transfer activities were reduced only a fewfold from those of wild-type IN (22). Because HIV-1H12N was partially defective for the preintegration step of reverse transcription as well as postintegration particle assembly and release (23), it seemed possible that defects at steps other than integration may have contributed to the overall replication-defective phenotype of HIV-1H12N. Replication-defective IN mutant viruses that display defects at steps other than integration have been labeled "class II" to distinguish them from mutants (class I) that are solely blocked at integration (20).
We recently conducted site-directed mutagenesis studies of residues conserved within the catalytic core (39) and C-terminal (37) domains of HIV-1 IN. The majority of replication-defective viruses were typed as class II mutants. Because the majority of the IN proteins derived from these mutant viruses retained catalytic function, we proposed that the viruses might be more defective for preintegration trafficking than for the catalytic steps of integration (38). In this study we targeted Lys-34 and Lys-46, two highly conserved residues within the NTD of HIV-1 IN. Whereas HIV-1K46A grew as wild type, HIV-1K34A was replication defective. Because the level of HIV-1K34A reverse transcription was reduced five- to tenfold from that of the wild type, it was categorized as a class II mutant virus. Because recombinant INK34A protein was active in in vitro integration assays and Vpr-INK34A efficiently transcomplemented the infectivity defects of class I mutant viruses in cells, we concluded that HIV-1K34A is another example of a replication-defective IN mutant that carries an inherently active enzyme. To directly test the integration activity of HIV-1K34A PICs, as well as those derived from other class II mutant viruses, a sensitive PCR-based assay was developed to quantify in vitro DNA recombination activity. The results showed that despite containing catalytically competent IN, class II mutant PICs are devoid of DNA recombination activity.
Experimental strategy. To complete our survey of conserved residues in IN function and HIV-1 replication, Lys-34 and Lys-46 within the NTD were targeted. These solvent-accessible side chains (9, 18, 46) were highly conserved among primate lentiviral strains. Position 34 was Lys in 346 of 347 HIV-1/SIVcpz strains, with Arg the sole outlier (31). Lys-46 was conserved in 345 strains, the others carrying Arg and Gln. Lys-46 was invariant among 35 additional HIV-2/SIV strains, with Arg and Lys present 30 and 5 times, respectively, at position 34 (31). To ascertain the roles of these residues in HIV-1 function, missense mutations K34A and K46A were generated in pUCWTpol (36), using QuikChange mutagenesis (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). Sequence-verified 1.8-kb AgeI-PflMI fragments were then swapped for corresponding pol-containing fragments in pNL43/XmaI and pNLX.Luc(R) to generate full-length and envelope-deleted molecular clones, respectively (38).
HIV-1K34A is replication defective. Titers of viral stocks made by transfecting 293T cells with full-length clones in the presence of calcium phosphate were determined using an exogenous 32P-based assay for reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, and Jurkat T cells were infected with equal RT counts per minute of wild-type or mutant virus, as previously described (38). At the approximate multiplicity of infection of 0.04, wild-type HIV-1NL4-3 reached peak growth 5 days postinfection (Fig. 1). Whereas HIV-1K46A also reached its peak growth at 5 days, HIV-1K34A failed to replicate over 2 months of observation (Fig. 1 and data not shown). Thus, although similarly conserved among a large collection of primate lentiviral strains, Lys-46 was dispensable under conditions where Lys-34 played a vital role in HIV-1 replication.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Replication profiles of wild-type and mutant viruses. Cell supernatants were analyzed for RT content at the indicated times as previously described (38). Like HIV-1K34A, cells infected with the negative-control CTD-deletion strain HIV-11-212 (40) failed to yield evidence of virus spread over 2 months of observation. Similar results were obtained following an independent set of infections. WT, wild type; dpi, days postinfection.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Particle release and reverse transcription profiles of wild-type and mutant viruses. (A) Virus release from HeLa cells. Percentages of RT activity in relation to side-by-side transfections of wild-type HIV-1NL4-3. Error bars represent results of duplicate RT assays following two independent transfections. (B) Reverse transcription profiles. Jurkat cells infected with the indicated single-round viruses were lysed at the indicated time points, and levels of HIV-1 cDNA were normalized to cellular endogenous retrovirus 3 (ERV-3), using RQ-PCR as previously described (38). Error bars are variations in results obtained from duplicate sets of RQ-PCR assays. Similar results were observed following an independent set of infections. WT, wild type; LRT, late reverse transcription.
|
HIV-1NLX.Luc(R) cDNA synthesis was below the limit of detection at 4 h postinfection (hpi) and peaked at approximately 7 hpi (Fig. 2B). Consistent with previous reports (39, 40), reverse transcription of class I mutant HIV-1D64N/D116N.Luc(R) was similar to that of the wild-type virus at 7 hpi (Fig. 2B). In sharp contrast, HIV-1K34A.Luc(R) cDNA levels were reduced approximately tenfold from that of the wild type at 7 hpi (Fig. 2B). This reduction was similar to the partial reverse transcription defects displayed by previously described class II mutants HIV-1H12N.Luc(R) (23) and HIV-1V165A.Luc(R) (38) (Fig. 2B). Because levels of class II mutant viral reverse transcription remained low at 24 hpi, we concluded that the reductions observed at 7 hpi were due to overall impairment of cDNA synthesis capacity rather than slow kinetics of reverse transcription (Fig. 2B) (39).
A minor fraction of retroviral cDNA is ligated via host-mediated nonhomologous DNA end joining in cell nuclei to yield circles with two adjoining copies of the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) (reference 35 and references therein). The fraction of HIV-1K34A.Luc(R) cDNA present as 2-LTR circles at 24 hpi was similar to the wild-type fraction, indicating that the mutation did not impair PIC nuclear localization (data not shown).
INK34A can catalyze HIV-1 integration. Because the level of HIV-1K34A.Luc(R) reverse transcription was similar to that of previously characterized class II mutant strains (Fig. 2B), HIV-1K34A was categorized as a class II IN mutant virus. The IN proteins derived from certain class II mutant viruses were catalytically active despite crippling blocks to viral preintegration function (38). In these cases, catalysis was demonstrated using purified recombinant proteins in in vitro integration assays and phenotypic complementation by Vpr-IN during HIV-1 infection. The infectivity defect of IN mutant viruses can be restored by transpackaging wild-type IN as a Vpr-IN fusion protein during HIV-1 assembly (25, 47). In addition, we and others have shown that fusion proteins derived from certain class II IN mutant viruses efficiently transcomplemented the infectivity defects of class I active site mutant reporter strains (1, 25, 38, 39, 43). To test the catalytic potential of INK34A in the context of virus infection, the K34A mutation was introduced into the pRL2P-Vpr-IN expression vector (obtained from J. Kappes, University of Alabama) as previously described (38). Single-round reporter viruses carrying the gene for firefly luciferase with or without added Vpr-IN were generated by cotransfecting 293T cells as previously described (38). Two previously characterized class I mutant viruses, HIV-1D64N/D116N.Luc(R) (38) and HIV-1W235E.Luc(R) (32, 37), as well as two class II mutant viruses, HIV-1H12N.Luc(R) (23) and HIV-1V165A.Luc(R) (38), served as controls. Jurkat T cells infected with equal RT counts per minute of reporter viral supernatants were processed for luciferase assays as previously described (38). Luciferase activities were normalized to total cell protein as determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.).
As previously established (1, 38), the Vpr-INV165A fusion protein efficiently transcomplemented the infectivity defect of class I mutant HIV-1D64N/D116N.Luc(R) (Table 1). In contrast, Vpr-INV165A failed to restore significant function to either class II mutant control strain. Vpr-INV165A restored approximately 2% of Vpr-wild-type IN (INWT) function to HIV-1K34A.Luc(R) (Table 1), which is consistent with previous observations that class II mutant viral INs tend to poorly transcomplement the infectivity defects of class II mutant reporter viruses (38).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Vpr-IN complementation activities of IN mutant virusesa
|
The results of Vpr-IN complementation demonstrated that INK34A could function in concert with IND64N/D116N or INW235E to integrate HIV-1 cDNA in vivo. To address the catalytic potential of INK34A in the absence of a second mutant IN protomer, the mutation was introduced into the bacterial expression vector pKBIN6H, and recombinant His6-tagged IN purified from soluble extracts of Escherichia coli cells was reacted with a 21-bp oligonucleotide modeling the U5 att site as previously described (38). Wild-type IN converted approximately 34% of the substrate to the nicked 3' processing product following 1 h at 37°C (Fig. 3A, lane 2). Because INK34A displayed about 50% of the level of wild-type activity (Fig. 3A, compare lane 5 to lane 2), we concluded that it is an active enzyme. Longer exposure of the autoradiogram demonstrated that INK34A supported DNA strand transfer activity at a level that was proportional to its 3' processing activity (Fig. 3B). INH12N, in contrast, supported only about 1% of wild-type IN function (Fig. 3A, lane 4).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Wild-type and mutant IN activities. (A) 3' Processing activity. Aliquots of integration assays conducted as previously described (38) were analyzed on polyacrylamide sequencing gels. 21, migration position of substrate DNA; 19, migration position of the 3' processing reaction product. (B) Longer autoradiographic exposures revealed products of DNA strand transfer (ST) in lanes 2 and 5. IN was omitted from the reaction in lanes 1. Results are representative of those obtained in two independent assays. WT, wild type.
|
exonuclease prior to deproteinization and PCR (2). To simplify, we designed an assay utilizing circular plasmid DNA as the target. Whereas Southern blotting can distinguish the integration of a single viral cDNA end from the concerted integration of both att sites that are normally catalyzed by HIV-1 PICs (10), the following assay quantifies the integration of the U3 DNA end. We note that the previous RQ-PCR assays for PIC function likewise monitored integration of just one HIV-1 end (2, 27). The assay is outlined in Fig. 4. Five different PCR primers, A to E, were designed (Fig. 4A). Primers A (AE2413; 5'-GTTGTTCCAGTTTGGAACAAGAGTC) and B (AE2414; 5'-ACTCAACCCTATCTCGGTCTATTC) annealed to opposite strands of the plasmid. Primer C (AE2257; 5'-TTTCAGGTCCCTGTTCGGGCGCCAC) annealed to the plus strand of the HIV-1 primer binding site (HIV-1NL4-3 nucleotides 665 to 635), and primers D (AE1068; 5'-GGTCTCTCTGGTTAGACCAG; HIV-1NL4-3 nucleotides 455 to 474) and E (AE1069; 5'-GATCTCTAGTTACCAGAGTC; HIV-1NL4-3 nucleotides 596 to 577) annealed to the minus and plus strands within the R and U5 regions of the LTR, respectively.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Design of a novel PIC integration assay. (A) Locations of PCR primers. Plasmid pTZ18U/PL (16) (thin lines) was obtained from H. Göttlinger (University of Massachusetts Medical School). The upstream LTR (bold lines, viral cDNA) is shaded gray. See text for details of primer sequences/locations. (B) In vitro integration products. The U3 end of the upstream LTR will integrate into either strand of pTZ18U/PL. (C) PCR products. One terminus of all first-round products is defined by primer C, and the other end contains sequences defined by primer A or B. The amount of nested product amplified using primers D and E (hatched box) was quantified using RQ-PCR. PBS, primer binding site.
|
HIV-1IIIB PICs were isolated from cocultures of chronically infected MOLTIIIB cells and uninfected CD4-positive SupT1 cells as previously described (11). RNase A-treated (20 µg/ml for 30 min at room temperature) cytoplasmic extract (350 µl) was either placed on ice (Fig. 5A, target) or adjusted to contain 8 mM EDTA (Fig. 5A, +EDTA), 10 µM IN inhibitor L-731,988 (28) (Fig. 5A, +L-731,988), or 0.005% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Fig. 5A, +target) to match the amount of DMSO introduced by the inhibitor. Plasmid DNA was added to the final concentration of 3 µg/ml to the EDTA-, drug-, and DMSO-treated samples, and integration proceeded for 45 min at 37°C. Following deproteinization and precipitation with ethanol, samples were resuspended in 50 µl of TE.1 buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 0.1 mM EDTA). Because EDTA (4, 24) and L-731,988 (28) inhibited PIC function, only the +target sample was expected to yield integration products.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Results of in vitro PIC assays. (A) HIV-1IIIB PIC activity levels under various experimental conditions. See text for details. Error bars represent the variation in results observed between duplicate RQ-PCR assays. water, activity obtained (0.13%) from using water in the first-round PCR. (B) Amplification curves of various dilutions of the +target sample (see text). Cycle threshold [C(t)] was set to maximize the r2 value of the corresponding standard curve. Although samples were run in duplicate, only one example of each dilution was shown for clarity. (C) Duplicate results from panel B plotted as log quantity response versus C(t) cycle number. This defined the standard curve utilized in panel A. (D) Wild-type and mutant HIV-1NL4-3 PIC activity levels. Levels were expressed as percentages of wild-type activity. Error bars indicate the variations in results obtained between duplicate RQ-PCR assays.
|
To determine the linearity of the assay, the +target sample was serially diluted (fourfold steps) to a final concentration of 1:4,096 prior to first-round amplification. The response fit well to ideal linear behavior, generating a standard curve with r2 = 0.995 (Fig. 5B and C). Comparing the cycle threshold values of the target, +EDTA, and +L-731,988 samples to the standard curve revealed relative integration activities of approximately 5.9%, 4.8%, and 3.7%, respectively (Fig. 5A). Because the target sample lacked plasmid DNA, we reasoned that these apparent activity levels were likely due to residual levels of unintegrated HIV-1 cDNA introduced into second-round PCRs upon dilution. To address this, the +target sample was reanalyzed, omitting from the first round either primer C (Fig. 5A, PBS primer) or primers A and B (Fig. 5A, target primers). Whereas the PBS primer sample yielded approximately 0.8% activity, the target primer sample revealed about 3.2% activity (Fig. 5A). This indicated that the low levels of activity detected in the absence of target DNA or in the presence of EDTA or L-731,988 were mainly due to first-round asymmetric amplification of HIV-1 cDNA via primer C. We concluded that the assay was linear, yielding an approximate 20- to 30-fold response over unreacted HIV-1 cDNA (Fig. 5A to C).
Class II IN mutant viruses yield defective PICs. In vitro integration activities of wild-type and IN mutant PICs were analyzed next. Virus supernatants (20 ml) from 293T cells transfected with full-length molecular clones using FuGENE 6 were treated with TURBO DNase as described above. RNase A-treated cytoplasmic extracts (2 ml) isolated from C8166 T cells (3 x 107) at 7 hpi (11) were split into two samples (0.9 ml), pTZ18U/PL was added to one, and integration proceeded as described above. Deproteinized and precipitated DNAs were resuspended in 40 µl of TE.1.
Because class II mutant viruses were partially defective for reverse transcription (Fig. 2B) (20, 37-39), it was important to normalize in vitro PIC activities to the different viral cDNA levels that formed during infection. For this, target samples (5 µl) were analyzed in duplicate by RQ-PCR using the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit and 0.3 µM each of gag-specific primers AE1070 (5'-GAAGCTGCAGAATGGGATAG; HIV-1NL4-3 nucleotides 1411 to 1430) and AE1071 (5'-GGTACTAGTAGTTCCTGCTA; HIV-1NL4-3 nucleotides 1515 to 1496). Reactions cycled as before were normalized to a standard curve created by fivefold dilutions (from 25,000 to 20 copies) of pNL43/XmaI (3). HIV-1D64N/D116N yielded approximately 110% of the level of wild-type HIV-1NL4-3 cDNA, HIV-1H12N about 10% of that of the wild type, HIV-1K34A about 21% of that of the wild type, HIV-1K64A about 62% of that of the wild type, and HIV-1V165A about 26% of that of the wild type. Minus-target and +target samples were analyzed for in vitro PIC activity, and the resulting target values, which ranged from 0.04% to 1.0% of wild type integration activity, were subtracted from corresponding +target values. Levels of in vitro PIC activities were then normalized to total cDNA levels.
As expected (11), the class I active site mutant HIV-1D64N/D116N failed to support appreciable levels of in vitro PIC activity (<0.5% of wild-type activity; Fig. 5D). Class II mutants HIV-1H12N, HIV-1K34A, and HIV-1V165A displayed similar low levels of activity (0.5% to 0.75% of that of wild type; Fig. 5D). In contrast, replication-competent HIV-1K64A supported about 66% of wild-type PIC activity. This analysis confirmed our previous results with HIV-1V165A PICs (36) and extended them to include HIV-1K34A, a separate class II mutant virus whose IN efficiently functioned in in vitro integration (Fig. 3) and Vpr-IN complementation (Table 1) assays. Our results also established an in vitro PCR-based PIC integration assay that, after correction for unintegrated HIV-1 cDNA levels, afforded approximately two orders of magnitude of sensitivity (Fig. 5).
IN enzyme function and HIV-1 replication. Through employing a novel, sensitive PCR-based assay for PIC function (Fig. 4), we determined that PICs derived from class II mutant viruses like HIV-1V165A and HIV-1K34A failed to support detectable levels of in vitro integration activity (Fig. 5), despite the fact that the mutant IN proteins were catalytically active in in vitro integration assays and in cell-based Vpr-IN complementation assays (Table 1; Fig. 3) (1, 38). We noted that this phenotype is not restricted to class II IN mutations. The W235E CTD mutation yielded the class I replication-defective phenotype (32), although INW235E supported wild-type levels of in vitro integration activities (33) and Vpr-INW235E efficiently transcomplemented HIV-1D64N/D116N.Luc(R) function (37). Akin to the results reported here, we previously determined that HIV-1W235E PICs failed to support detectable levels of in vitro integration activity (11).
Based on results of Vpr-IN complementation, the mutant IN proteins can function in the context of HIV-1 PICs if a second defective IN protomer is present. Yet, when they are the sole IN, the PICs lacked detectable levels of in vitro activity (11, 36) (Fig. 5D), failed to develop mature intasomes (11), and, more often than not, failed to support wild-type levels of reverse transcription (38, 39) (Fig. 2B). Given efficient transcomplementation of active site mutant reporter viruses, the active site mutant protomer is likely to supply an auxiliary function(s) that is essential for proper PIC maturation and/or trafficking. Because HIV-1 IN interacts with a variety of human cell proteins (44), we and others previously proposed that the inability to interact with cell components may be the root cause of the phenotype (17, 38). Alternatively, higher-order interactions specific to formation of the HIV-1 intasome (11) that are independent of cellular components could also be at play. Pinpointing the type(s) of IN-mediated interaction(s) that is likely missing from these types of replication-defective viruses would be expected to define novel targets for antiviral intervention in the fight against HIV/AIDS.
This work was supported by NIH grants AI39394, AI52014 (A.E.), and AI60354 (Harvard Medical School Center for AIDS Research).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»