Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, September 2005, p. 12117-12121, Vol. 79, No. 18
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.18.12117-12121.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Sustained CD8+ T-Cell Responses Induced after Acute Parvovirus B19 Infection in Humans
Oscar Norbeck,1*
Adiba Isa,1
Christoph Pöhlmann,2
Kristina Broliden,1
Victoria Kasprowicz,3
Paul Bowness,3
Paul Klenerman,4 and
Thomas Tolfvenstam1,2
Infectious Diseases Unit, Center of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,1
Division of Clinical Virology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden,2
MRC Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom,3
Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom4
Received 9 June 2005/
Accepted 24 June 2005

ABSTRACT
Murine models have suggested that CD8
+ T-cell responses peak
early in acute viral infections and are not sustained, but no
evidence for humans has been available. To address this, we
longitudinally analyzed the CD8
+ T-cell response to human parvovirus
B19 in acutely infected individuals. We observed striking CD8
+ T-cell responses, which were sustained or even increased over
many months after the resolution of acute disease, indicating
that CD8
+ T cells may play a prominent role in the control of
parvovirus B19 and other acute viral infections of humans, including
potentially those generated by live vaccines.

TEXT
The emergence of new tools for the ex vivo analysis of cellular
immune responses, especially CD8
+ T-cell responses, has revealed
an important role for such cells in a range of viral infections.
In studies with mice, most work on acute infection has been
focused on influenza and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus
(
6,
11,
29). However, very little is known about CD8
+ T-cell
responses in acute infections in humans; most work has focused
on latent and persistent infections, such as human immunodeficiency
virus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, and hepatitis
B and C virus (
1,
16,
17) infections. In infections which are
truly cleared, such as influenza, responses may return to a
low-level resting memory state (
20). In contrast, in infections
with very-low-level persistence, such as CMV infection, strong
immune responses may be sustained, and indeed, may increase
over time (
12,
13). Such responses typically possess "mature"
effector characteristics indicative of repetitive antigen exposure
(
2,
26). Parvovirus B19 (B19) is a common virus with significant
pathology (
7). As B19 is regarded as a typical "hit-and-run"
virus, the humoral response plays a well-documented role for
viral neutralization, but there is also evidence that low-level
persistence can occur in certain cases (
21,
27). Cellular immune
responses have also recently been described, both CD4
+ proliferative-
and CD8
+ cytotoxic-T-cell responses, with one HLA-B35-restricted
epitope characterized so far (
4,
5,
28). The small B19 genome
is very stable and encodes only three major proteins, which
makes it suitable for extensive study without compromise due
to incoming antigenic variability. Here, we describe the first
assessment of the breadth, specificity, and kinetics of the
acute CD8
+ T-cell responses in this infection.
B19 immunoglobulin M (IgM)-positive samples from five previously healthy adult females (S1 through S5; age range, 32 to 51 years) were prospectively identified at the Clinical Virology Laboratory at the Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, after local ethical approval of the study. All presented with symptoms of fever, arthralgia, fatigue, and rashes, and were diagnosed within 11 days. Medical history gave no indication of susceptibility to infections. Serum and heparinized blood samples were collected at intervals for 48 to 108 weeks after diagnosis. Serum was analyzed for B19 DNA by nested PCR with a sensitivity of 103 DNA copies/ml and for B19 IgM and IgG by using an enzyme immunoassay (Biotrin International, Dublin, Ireland) (28). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated by Ficoll-Paque (Amersham, Uppsala, Sweden). DNA was extracted from PBMC by using the QIAamp DNA minikit (VWR, Stockholm, Sweden) and analyzed by PCR to enable B19 DNA detection in escaped cells from bone marrow. HLA class I genotyping was performed by ABC SSP Unitray (Dynal, Oslo, Norway). Published sequences were used for synthesizing 210 peptides covering the nonstructural protein (NS), the unique region of the minor (VP1ur) structural protein, and the major (VP2) structural proteins (Table 1) (24). Gamma interferon (IFN-
) responses were measured by ELISpot (15), using biotinylated IFN-
antibodies (Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden) and by intracellular staining (ICS) (18). PBMC was depleted of CD8+ T cells by using microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Gladbach, Germany). Nonamer-mediated cytotoxicity was tested by 51Cr-release assay (22, 25). HLA restrictions were estimated by using the BIMAS algorithm (http://bimas.cit.nih.gov) and T2-cell assays (14) and by matching single HLA alleles of targets and effectors in 51Cr experiments.
All individuals showed normal mitogen-induced IFN-

responses
and proliferation in vitro (data not shown). Fever, rashes,
and fatigue resolved within 6 weeks. Responses to 8 of the 14
NS pools and 1 of the 6 VP2 pools were shown. No responses to
the VP1ur pools were shown. All individuals responded to NS,
whereas a VP2 response was present in only two individuals.
Responses peaked at around 1 year in S1, S2, and S3, with a
decline at about 2 years, whereas S4 showed a more rapid course,
with a peak at 15 weeks and a decline at 1 year (Fig.
1). S5
was followed for 48 weeks with stable response levels. In S2,
IgM antibodies were detected for more than 90 weeks, whereas
in all others, they were lost between weeks 15 and 35. From
the second week, IgG levels were raised and maintained above
6 IU/ml (
23). In S2 and S5, B19 DNA was detected in PBMC throughout
the entire follow-up, while this was lost between weeks 13 and
41 in the other individuals. Pool responses were fine mapped
to five 15-mers and nine nonamers, of which seven nonamers were
considered to represent novel CD8
+ T-cell epitopes (Table
2;
Fig.
2). By combined methods, it was possible to suggest HLA
restrictions for four of these epitopes. When stimulating peptides
of different lengths around the sequence of NS(9)456-TEA (see
Table
2 for peptide nomenclature) were used in ICS, an additional
B*44-restricted 11-mer epitope was detected (data not shown).
Thus, adults presenting with symptomatic B19 infection rapidly
develop cellular immune responses with multiple specificities,
which rise to high levels and are maintained for many months.
The responses do not decay as anticipated but are kept at high
levels for a long time, sometimes more than 2 years. This could
be the result of continuous antigenic stimulation, analogous
to truly persistent low-level CMV infection. Indeed, for three
out of five individuals, B19 DNA was detected in peripheral
blood for over 6 months. It is possible that B19 persists beyond
this time in the bone marrow, in which prolonged replication
has been observed (
8,
19). Most responses were directed to NS,
while two individuals also responded to an epitope in VP2. In
contrast, neutralizing antibodies and a majority of CD4
+ T-cell
responses are reported to be primarily directed to the structural
proteins (
4,
5,
21). Thus, there is evidently a division in
structural and nonstructural preference for the different arms
of the immune system. Importantly, we found that S3, S4, and
S5 all made three roughly equal responses at 5 to 10 weeks after
symptom onset. All but one of these responses were maintained
at equal high levels over at least a further 20 weeks. Thus,
in B19 infection, multiple "equidominant" CD8
+ T-cell immune
responses occur simultaneously, with no clear pattern of changing
dominant responses over time as, for example, seen for Epstein-Barr
virus or murine CMV (
9,
26). This may reflect the structural
and replicative simplicity of B19, in that no division in early
and late proteins exists. Other responses may have been missed
either because they occurred very early or were not detected
using 15- or 20-mer peptides. B19 is not classically persistent
in normal infection and is present only in about 2% of bone
marrow samples from healthy subjects (
8). However, it seems
clear that B19 infection is not to be immunologically described
by the paradigm of lytic nonpersistent viruses that postulates
rapid viral clearance and contraction of the initial cytotoxic-T-cell
burst in the absence of antigenic drive (
3,
10). B19 assumes
characteristics of lytic viruses, both of lytic nonpersistent,
and persistent, viruses, and elicits a striking pattern of immunological
response in human primary infection. Harnessing such CD8
+ T-cell
responses to generate vaccine responsiveness is an exciting
possibility. In further comprehensive approaches to characterization
of the human CD8
+ T-cell response, B19 may serve as a key model
for dissecting the complexities of long-term virus-host relationships.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was supported by the Tobias Foundation, the Swedish
Children's Cancer Foundation, the Swedish Cancer Foundation,
the Swedish Research Council, the Wellcome Trust, the Medical
Research Council, United Kingdom, and the Commission of the
European Communities (QLK2-CT-2001-00877).
We thank Victor Levitsky, Kiyotaka Kuzushima, and Lopez de Castro for generously providing the T2 cell lines.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Infectious Diseases Unit, Center of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital L08:03, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden. Phone: 46-8-517 700 00. Fax: 46-8-313147. E-mail:
oscar.norbeck{at}cmm.ki.se.


REFERENCES
1 - Addo, M. M., X. G. Yu, A. Rathod, D. Cohen, R. L. Eldridge, D. Strick, M. N. Johnston, C. Corcoran, A. G. Wurcel, C. A. Fitzpatrick, M. E. Feeney, W. R. Rodriguez, N. Basgoz, R. Draenert, D. R. Stone, C. Brander, P. J. Goulder, E. S. Rosenberg, M. Altfeld, and B. D. Walker. 2003. Comprehensive epitope analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T-cell responses directed against the entire expressed HIV-1 genome demonstrate broadly directed responses, but no correlation to viral load. J. Virol. 77:2081-2092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Appay, V., P. R. Dunbar, M. Callan, P. Klenerman, G. M. Gillespie, L. Papagno, G. S. Ogg, A. King, F. Lechner, C. A. Spina, S. Little, D. V. Havlir, D. D. Richman, N. Gruener, G. Pape, A. Waters, P. Easterbrook, M. Salio, V. Cerundolo, A. J. McMichael, and S. L. Rowland-Jones. 2002. Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections. Nat. Med. 8:379-385.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Badovinac, V. P., B. B. Porter, and J. T. Harty. 2002. Programmed contraction of CD8(+) T cells after infection. Nat. Immunol. 3:619-626.[Medline]
4 - Franssila, R., and K. Hedman. 2004. T-helper cell-mediated interferon-gamma, interleukin-10 and proliferation responses to a candidate recombinant vaccine for human parvovirus B19. Vaccine 22:3809-3815.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Franssila, R., K. Hokynar, and K. Hedman. 2001. T helper cell-mediated in vitro responses of recently and remotely infected subjects to a candidate recombinant vaccine for human parvovirus b19. J. Infect. Dis. 183:805-809.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Gourley, T. S., E. J. Wherry, D. Masopust, and R. Ahmed. 2004. Generation and maintenance of immunological memory. Semin. Immunol. 16:323-333.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Heegaard, E. D., and K. E. Brown. 2002. Human parvovirus B19. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15:485-505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Heegaard, E. D., B. L. Petersen, C. J. Heilmann, and A. Hornsleth. 2002. Prevalence of parvovirus B19 and parvovirus V9 DNA and antibodies in paired bone marrow and serum samples from healthy individuals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:933-936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Hislop, A. D., N. E. Annels, N. H. Gudgeon, A. M. Leese, and A. B. Rickinson. 2002. Epitope-specific evolution of human CD8(+) T cell responses from primary to persistent phases of Epstein-Barr virus infection. J. Exp. Med. 195:893-905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Hou, S., L. Hyland, K. W. Ryan, A. Portner, and P. C. Doherty. 1994. Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell memory determined by clonal burst size. Nature 369:652-654.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Kagi, D., B. Ledermann, K. Burki, P. Seiler, B. Odermatt, K. J. Olsen, E. R. Podack, R. M. Zinkernagel, and H. Hengartner. 1994. Cytotoxicity mediated by T cells and natural killer cells is greatly impaired in perforin-deficient mice. Nature 369:31-37.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Khan, N., N. Shariff, M. Cobbold, R. Bruton, J. A. Ainsworth, A. J. Sinclair, L. Nayak, and P. A. Moss. 2002. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity drives the CD8 T cell repertoire toward greater clonality in healthy elderly individuals. J. Immunol. 169:1984-1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Komatsu, H., S. Sierro, A. V. Cuero, and P. Klenerman. 2003. Population analysis of antiviral T cell responses using MHC class I-peptide tetramers. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 134:9-12.[CrossRef][Medline]
14 - Kuzushima, K., N. Hayashi, H. Kimura, and T. Tsurumi. 2001. Efficient identification of HLA-A*2402-restricted cytomegalovirus-specific CD8(+) T-cell epitopes by a computer algorithm and an enzyme-linked immunospot assay. Blood 98:1872-1881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Larsson, M., X. Jin, B. Ramratnam, G. S. Ogg, J. Engelmayer, M. A. Demoitie, A. J. McMichael, W. I. Cox, R. M. Steinman, D. Nixon, and N. Bhardwaj. 1999. A recombinant vaccinia virus based ELISPOT assay detects high frequencies of Pol-specific CD8 T cells in HIV-1-positive individuals. AIDS 13:767-777.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Lauer, G. M., E. Barnes, M. Lucas, J. Timm, K. Ouchi, A. Y. Kim, C. L. Day, G. K. Robbins, D. R. Casson, M. Reiser, G. Dusheiko, T. M. Allen, R. T. Chung, B. D. Walker, and P. Klenerman. 2004. High resolution analysis of cellular immune responses in resolved and persistent hepatitis C virus infection. Gastroenterology 127:924-936.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Lauer, G. M., K. Ouchi, R. T. Chung, T. N. Nguyen, C. L. Day, D. R. Purkis, M. Reiser, A. Y. Kim, M. Lucas, P. Klenerman, and B. D. Walker. 2002. Comprehensive analysis of CD8+-T-cell responses against hepatitis C virus reveals multiple unpredicted specificities. J. Virol. 76:6104-6113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Lechner, F., D. K. Wong, P. R. Dunbar, R. Chapman, R. T. Chung, P. Dohrenwend, G. Robbins, R. Phillips, P. Klenerman, and B. D. Walker. 2000. Analysis of successful immune responses in persons infected with hepatitis C virus. J. Exp. Med. 191:1499-1512.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Lundqvist, A., T. Tolfvenstam, J. Bostic, M. Soderlund, and K. Broliden. 1999. Clinical and laboratory findings in immunocompetent patients with persistent parvovirus B19 DNA in bone marrow. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 31:11-16.[CrossRef][Medline]
20 - Maczek, C., T. G. Berger, B. Schuler-Thurner, E. S. Schultz, A. Hamann, P. R. Dunbar, V. Cerundolo, A. Steinkasserer, and G. Schuler. 2005. Differences in phenotype and function between spontaneously occurring melan-A-, tyrosinase- and influenza matrix peptide-specific CTL in HLA-A*0201 melanoma patients. Int. J. Cancer 115:450-455.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Modrow, S., and S. Dorsch. 2002. Antibody responses in parvovirus B19 infected patients. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 50:326-331.[Medline]
22 - Nixon, D. F., A. R. Townsend, J. G. Elvin, C. R. Rizza, J. Gallwey, and A. J. McMichael. 1988. HIV-1 gag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes defined with recombinant vaccinia virus and synthetic peptides. Nature 336:484-487.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Searle, K., C. Guilliard, and G. Enders. 1997. Parvovirus B19 diagnosis in pregnant women-quantification of IgG antibody levels (IU/ml) with reference to the international parvovirus B19 standard serum. Infection 25:32-34.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Shade, R. O., M. C. Blundell, S. F. Cotmore, P. Tattersall, and C. R. Astell. 1986. Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of human parvovirus B19 isolated from the serum of a child during aplastic crisis. J. Virol. 58:921-936.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Sheehy, M. E., A. B. McDermott, S. N. Furlan, P. Klenerman, and D. F. Nixon. 2001. A novel technique for the fluorometric assessment of T lymphocyte antigen specific lysis. J. Immunol. Methods 249:99-110.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - Sierro, S., R. Rothkopf, and P. Klenerman. 2005. Evolution of diverse antiviral CD8+ T cell populations after murine cytomegalovirus infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 35:1113-1123.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Soderlund-Venermo, M., K. Hokynar, J. Nieminen, H. Rautakorpi, and K. Hedman. 2002. Persistence of human parvovirus B19 in human tissues. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 50:307-316.[Medline]
28 - Tolfvenstam, T., A. Oxenius, D. A. Price, B. L. Shacklett, H. M. Spiegel, K. Hedman, O. Norbeck, M. Levi, K. Olsen, M. Kantzanou, D. F. Nixon, K. Broliden, and P. Klenerman. 2001. Direct ex vivo measurement of CD8+ T-lymphocyte responses to human parvovirus B19. J. Virol. 75:540-543.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Wherry, E. J., and R. Ahmed. 2004. Memory CD8 T-cell differentiation during viral infection. J. Virol. 78:5535-5545.[Free Full Text]
Journal of Virology, September 2005, p. 12117-12121, Vol. 79, No. 18
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.18.12117-12121.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Wodarz, D., Sierro, S., Klenerman, P.
(2007). Dynamics of killer T cell inflation in viral infections. J R Soc Interface
4: 533-543
[Abstract]
[Full Text]