Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2005, p. 11239-11246, Vol. 79, No. 17
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.17.11239-11246.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Virology and WHO National Influenza Center, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Received 16 March 2005/ Accepted 9 June 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Substitutions introduced in CTL epitopes in this study
|
CD8+-T-cell clones. Generation of CD8+-T-cell clones directed against the HLA-A*0201-restricted epitope M158-66, the HLA-B*3501-restricted epitope NP418-426, and the HLA-A*0101-restricted epitopes NP44-52 and PB1591-599 was described previously (5, 58).
Target cells. B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, established as described previously (53), and three C1R cell lines, kindly provided by P. Romero (HLA-A*0201-transfected C1R cell line), M. Takiguchi (HLA-B*3501-transfected C1R cell line), and P. Cresswell (HLA-A*0101-transfected C1R cell line), were used as target cells. Peptide labeling was performed by incubating 106 cells/ml overnight with 5 µM peptide in RPMI 1640 medium (Cambrex, East Rutherford, NJ) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics (R10F). Peptides were manufactured, high-performance liquid chromatography purified (immunograde, >85% purity), and analyzed by mass spectrometry (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium). For infection with the recombinant influenza viruses, 106 target cells were infected at an MOI of 3 in a volume of 1 ml. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, the cells were resuspended in R10F and incubated for 16 to 18 h.
Intracellular IFN-
staining and flow cytometry.
The CD8+-T-cell clones were adjusted to a concentration of 106 cells/ml in R10F supplemented with Golgistop (monensin; Pharmingen, Alphen a/d Rijn, The Netherlands). Sixty thousand effector cells were incubated with 3 x 105 stimulator cells, which were infected, pulsed with peptides, or left untreated, for 6 h at 37°C in U-bottom plates. Subsequently intracellular gamma interferon (IFN-
) staining was performed as described previously (6). In brief, the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% FCS (P2F) and Golgistop, stained with monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed to CD3 (Becton Dickinson, Alphen a/d Rijn, The Netherlands) and CD8 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix and Cytoperm (Pharmingen), and stained with a MAb specific for IFN-
(Pharmingen). At least 5 x 103 gated CD3+ CD8+ events were acquired using a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson) flow cytometer. The data were analyzed using the software program Cell Quest Pro (Becton Dickinson).
ELISPOT.
Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays were performed as described previously (3). In brief, 96-well Silent Screen plates (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY) were coated with 2.5 µg/ml of anti-IFN-
MAb 1-DIK (Mabtech, Stockholm, Sweden) and blocked with RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% human AB serum (Sanquin Bloodbank, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), antibiotics, and 20 µM ß-mercaptoethanol (R10H). Three thousand cells of CD8+-T-cell clones were incubated with 3 x 104 target cells, which were infected, pulsed with peptides, or left untreated, for 4 h. Next, the plates were washed with PBS-0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and secreted IFN-
was detected using biotinylated anti-IFN-
MAb 7-B6-1 (Mabtech; dilution of 1:5,000). Subsequently, streptavidin labeled with alkaline phosphatase was added, which was visualized with the phosphatase substrate BCIP/NBT (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate/nitroblue tetrazolium) (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). Numbers of spots were counted using an automated image analysis ELISPOT reader (Aelvis; Sanquin Bloodbank, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Chromium release assay. Chromium release assays were performed as described previously (1). In brief, 7.5 x 105 cells per target were labeled with 75 µCi Na2[51Cr]O4 and incubated with CD8+-T-cell clone at effector/target (E:T) ratios of 10, 5, 2.5, and 1. Target cells were also incubated with 10% Triton X-100 or R10F to determine the maximum and spontaneous release, respectively. After 4 h of incubation, the supernatants were harvested (Skatron Instruments, Sterling, VA) and radioactivity was measured by gamma counting. The percentage of specific lysis was calculated by the following formula: [(experimental release spontaneous release)/(maximum release spontaneous release)] x 100%. The chromium release assays were performed in quadruplicate, and the data are presented as the average.
Synonymous/nonsynonymous analysis. The ratio of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions was calculated using a synonymous/nonsynonymous analysis program (SNAP) (27, 38, 40) at www.hiv.lanl.gov. The NP nucleotide sequences of influenza viruses A/England/878/69 (AY210221) and A/New York/12/2003 (CY000124) obtained from the Influenza Sequence Database (www.flu.lanl.gov) (32) were used in comparison for analysis by SNAP. These viruses were selected since the NP genes belonged to the same lineage of influenza A (H3N2) viruses (30).
|
|
|---|
Viral fitness of influenza viruses with mutations in CTL epitopes. Since the HLA-A*0201-restricted epitope M158-66 (GILGFVFTL) is highly conserved, we selected this epitope to examine the effect on viral fitness of alanine replacements at each of the nine positions of the epitope. Mutant viruses could be rescued with alanine replacements at all positions within the M158-66 epitope, except for the second position (Fig. 1A). The alanine replacement at position 59 of the matrix protein, which is the anchor residue of the M158-66 epitope, was detrimental to viral fitness. Although viruses with alanine replacements at the other eight positions were rescued, the virus replication kinetics of these mutants was affected compared to that of wild-type virus (Fig. 1B). Especially, mutant viruses A/NL/95-M1 F62A and -M1 F64A yielded >100-fold less progeny virus than the wild-type virus at 12 h postinfection. At 48 h postinfection, the differences from wild-type virus were still at least 50-fold. In addition, the L60A substitution caused a reduction of 75-fold in virus production compared to wild-type virus from 24 h onwards. Since the dramatic effect of the alanine replacement at the anchor residue was of special interest, we decided to study the effect of more conservative substitutions at position 59. We also replaced the isoleucine at this position with a leucine and a valine (M1 I59L and I59V) and found that in contrast to M1 I59A these replacements were tolerated by the virus to a certain extent, since these mutant viruses were readily rescued (Fig. 1C). We also performed multistep growth curves with these mutant viruses. Six and 12 h postinfection, these mutant viruses yielded 100-fold and 30-fold less progeny virus than wild-type virus, respectively. From 24 h postinfection onwards, these differences were no longer statistically significant (Fig. 1D).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of amino acid substitutions in the M158-66 epitope on viral fitness. Upon transfection of 293T cells and subsequent rescue in MDCK cells, infectious virus titers were determined for the wild-type (WT) and mutant influenza viruses with alanine replacements for each of the nine amino acids of the M158-66 epitope (A) and with the more conservative substitutions at position 59 (C). Influenza virus could be rescued with alanine replacements at all positions within the M158-66 epitope, except for position 59 (A). Influenza A virus tolerated the more conservative substitutions M1 I59L and I59V to a certain extent (C). The data represent the average of three experiments. Subsequently, growth curves were generated (B and D) postinfection (p.i.) of MDCK cells at an MOI of 0.001. Virus replication kinetics for wild-type virus () and M1 G58A ( ), L60A ( ), G61A ( ), F62A ( ), V63A ( ), F64A ( ), T65A ( ), L66A ( ) (B), and wild-type virus (), I59L ( ), and I59V ( ) (D) are shown. The data represent the average of three experiments. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. An asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05, Student's t test).
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of amino acid substitutions in the NP418-426 epitope on viral fitness. Upon transfection of 293T cells and subsequent rescue in MDCK cells, infectious virus titers were determined for the wild-type and mutant influenza viruses with alanine replacements at position 419 or 426 or with the more conservative substitutions NP P419G and M426I (A). The data represent the average of three experiments. Subsequently, growth curves of wild-type (WT) virus () and influenza virus A/NL/95-NP M426I ( ) were generated postinfection (p.i.) of MDCK cells at an MOI of 0.001 (B). The data represent the average of three experiments. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. An asterisk indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05, Student's t test).
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of amino acid substitutions on viral fitness. Upon transfection of 293T cells and subsequent rescue in MDCK cells, infectious virus titers were determined for the wild-type (WT) and mutant influenza viruses with the conservative amino acid substitution PB1 D593N, NP E46Q, or NP R175K in epitopes PB1591-599, NP44-52, and NP174-184, respectively (A). The data represent the average of three experiments. Subsequently, growth curves of wild-type virus () and mutant viruses A/NL/95-NP E46Q ( ) and R175K ( ) were generated postinfection (p.i.) of MDCK cells at an MOI of 0.001 (B). The data represent the average of three experiments. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. An asterisk indicates statistical significance between the wild type and mutant influenza virus A/NL/95-NP E46Q at 6 and 12 h postinfection and between the wild type and influenza virus A/NL/95-NP R175K at 48 and 72 h postinfection (P < 0.05, Student's t test).
|
staining, ELISPOT assay, and classical chromium release assays. As shown in Fig. 4, the M158-66-specific CTL clone recognized C1R-A2 cells infected with wild-type virus and mutant A/NL/95 virus with the M1 G58A, L60A, or L66A substitution, but not cells infected with A/NL/95 mutant viruses with the M1 G61A, F62A, V63A, or T65A substitution or noninfected cells, as determined by intracellular IFN-
staining and flow cytometry. These observations were confirmed by ELISPOT (Fig. 4K and L) and by chromium release assays (Fig. 4M and N). A control CTL clone specific for the NP418-426 epitope recognized target cells infected with all mutant A/NL/95 viruses similarly, indicating that the infection of the cells and the processing and presentation of immunogenic peptides were comparable for all viruses (Fig. 4L and N). The recognition of A/NL/95-M1 I59A and F64A could not be tested, since these mutant viruses could not be propagated to sufficiently high titers. C1R-A2 cells infected with A/NL/95 mutant viruses with the more conservative amino acid substitutions M1 I59V and I59L were fully recognized in all three assays (Fig. 5).
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of alanine replacements in the M158-66 epitope on recognition by specific CTL. Reactivity of CTL clone, directed against the M158-66 epitope, with stimulator cells infected with wild type (WT) (B) or influenza virus A/NL/95-M1 G58A (C), L60A (D), G61A (E), F62A (F), V63A (G), T65A (H), or L66A (I) was determined by intracellular IFN- staining and flow cytometry. PE, phycoerythrin conjugate; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate. GILGFVFTL-peptide pulsed cells were included as a positive control (J). Untreated cells were used as a negative control (A). Indicated is the percentage IFN- -positive cells within the CD8+-T-cell population. The data are also presented as the number of IFN- -positive spots, as measured in an IFN- -specific ELISPOT assay (K). In addition, the percentage of specific lysis, as measured in chromium release assays, is shown (M). Effector cells were added at an effector/target cell ratio of 10, and specific lysis was calculated. A CTL clone specific for the NP418-426 epitope was used as a control (L, N). The recognition of A/NL/95-M1 I59A and F64A could not be tested, since these mutant viruses could not be propagated to sufficiently high titers (*). Data from representative experiments are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of selected amino acid substitutions in the M158-66 epitope on recognition by specific CTL. Reactivity of the CTL clone, directed against the M158-66 epitope, with stimulator cells infected with the wild type (WT) (B) or influenza virus A/NL/95-M1 I59L (C) or I59V (D) was determined by intracellular IFN- staining and flow cytometry. PE, phycoerythrin conjugate; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate. GILGFVFTL-peptide-pulsed cells were included as a positive control (E). Untreated cells were used as a negative control (A). Indicated is the percentage IFN- + cells within the CD8+-T-cell population. The data are also presented as the number of IFN- -positive spots, as measured in an IFN- -specific ELISPOT assay (F). In addition, the percentage of specific lysis, as measured in chromium release assays, is shown (H). Effector cells were added at different effector/target cell ratios as indicated, and specific lysis was calculated. A CTL clone specific for the NP418-426 epitope was used as a control (G, I). Data from representative experiments are shown.
|
staining and ELISPOT and chromium release assays (Fig. 6B, E, and G). However, cells infected with A/NL/95-NP M426I were recognized by M158-66-specific CTL, but not by NP418-426-specific CTL (Fig. 6C, F, and H). These results were confirmed by showing that the functional avidity of the NP418-426-specific CTL decreased more than 100-fold by the NP M426I substitution, using serial dilutions of wild-type and mutant peptide in ELISPOT assays (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Amino acid substitution NP M426I affects recognition by specific CTL. Reactivity of the CTL clone, directed against the NP418-426 epitope, with stimulator cells infected with the wild type (B) or influenza virus A/NL/95-NP M426I (C) was determined by intracellular IFN- staining and flow cytometry. PE, phycoerythrin conjugate; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate. LPFEKSTVM-peptide-pulsed cells were included as a positive control (D). Untreated cells were used as a negative control (A). Indicated is the percentage of IFN- -positive cells within the CD8+-T-cell population. The data are also presented as the number of IFN- -positive spots, as measured in an IFN- -specific ELISPOT (F). In addition, the percentage of specific lysis, as measured in chromium release assays, is shown (H). Effector cells were added at different effector/target cell ratios as indicated, and specific lysis was calculated. A CTL clone specific for the M158-66 epitope was used as a control (E, G). The recognition of A/NL/95-NP P419A, M426A, and P419G could not be tested, since these mutations prevented rescue of viable virus. Data from representative experiments are shown.
|
|
|
|---|
The synonymous/nonsynonymous analysis revealed that in the 90 amino acids that constitute the 14 known epitopes located in the NP, relatively more nonsynonymous mutations occurred between 1969 and 2003 than in the rest of the protein. The hypervariable epitope NP418-426 had a major impact on the lower ds/dn ratio, and 5 out of the 14 partially overlapping epitopes were fully conserved. Some points in this analysis should be taken into consideration. First, since commonly old prototypic strains like A/Puerto Rico/8/34 have been used for the identification of influenza virus CTL epitopes, there is a bias towards the identification of conserved epitopes (12-14, 18, 25, 32, 33, 54, 57, 59). Recent work in our laboratory indicates that a significant number of epitopes are not conserved (Berkhoff et al., unpublished data). Second, the conserved epitopes and the variable epitopes, including the NP418-426 epitope, have in common that they all retained their anchor residues for binding to their corresponding HLA molecules. The only exception to this is an amino acid substitution at position 384 of the NP. The R384G substitution, which is at the anchor residues of the HLA-B*0801- and -B*2705-restricted epitopes NP380-388 and NP383-391, resulted in the loss of their epitopes and abrogated recognition of virus-infected cells by specific CTL (51, 58). However, introduction of a glycine at position 384 of the NP of influenza virus A/Hong Kong/2/68 was detrimental to viral fitness, and several comutations associated with the R384G substitution in epidemic influenza virus strains were required to functionally compensate for the detrimental effect of the R384G substitution (50, 52). Similar findings have been observed for CTL escape mutants of HIV and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), which also accumulated extraepitopic comutations in the gag protein for restoration of viral fitness in the presence of mutations in CTL epitopes (17, 26, 42). Apparently, RNA viruses display sufficient flexibility to escape from CTL and retain viral fitness. For HIV and SIV, the selective pressure is mediated by CTL during the chronic infection of individual hosts, while for influenza viruses this takes place by CTL immunity at the population level (19). It is of special interest that also for HIV, CTL escape mutants can be identified at the population level (45), although transmission rates of this virus are much lower than those for influenza viruses. Thus, influenza virus CTL epitopes are either conserved, display variation at non-anchor residues, or lose their anchor residues at the cost of viral fitness, which is functionally compensated for by the accumulation of comutations. To assess the impact of amino acid substitutions in conserved epitopes on viral fitness and recognition by specific CTL, we conducted a mutational analysis of the epitope M158-66 (GILGFVFTL). This epitope is immunodominant and recognized by a large portion of individuals in the population, but is highly conserved. Replacement of the anchor residue at position 2 of the epitope (M1 I59A) was detrimental to viral fitness, whereas alanine replacements at the other eight positions did not prevent rescue of recombinant influenza virus and were tolerated to various extents. The M158-66 epitope is located in the fourth N-terminal
-helix of the M1 protein. Mutations in this region may disturb the functional and structural integrity of the protein, as has been described for mutations in the M1 "helix six" domain (8, 31). The reduced virus titers obtained with a number of these mutant M1 viruses correlated with the number of productively infected cells, as measured by immunofluorescence assay using an NP-specific monoclonal antibody 6 h postinfection of MDCK cells, suggesting that the virus replication cycle was affected at an early pretranscriptional stage (data not shown). Conservative amino acid substitutions at position 2 of the M158-66 epitope (M1 I59L and I59V) were less critical, although the kinetics of viral replication was somewhat affected. More importantly, the A/NL/95-M1 I59L and I59V mutant viruses were fully recognized by M158-66 specific CTL, which makes it unlikely that these variants would ever emerge in the human population. Although some of the other alanine replacements resulted in the partial loss of recognition by M158-66-specific CTL, their impaired replication kinetics is not in favor of the emergence of these mutants. We speculate that there must be a trade-off between viral fitness and immune recognition of which we have little insight at present. The T-cell recognition patterns that were observed here with mutant virus-infected cells were in agreement with those observed with mutant M158-66-peptides in previous studies (1, 20, 41). Although the use of T-cell clones may not reflect the situation in vivo, the analysis of anchor residues boils down to recognition of the epitope or not, which is not different between clonal and polyclonal T-cell populations. In the analysis of T-cell receptor contact residues, as done for the M158-66 epitope, the situation is more complicated. However, the M158-66-specific CTL response is oligoclonal in nature and dominated by T cells carrying the T-cell receptor with Vß 17 chains (29, 37). Fitness costs also limit variation in the highly immunodominant Gag p11C, C-M CTL epitope of SIV and escape from specific CTL (43). Therefore, this phenomenon may be more universal and apply to more RNA viruses, which are under selective pressure mediated by CTL. It even may contribute to shaping of the T-cell repertoire and have an influence on the hierarchy of epitope dominance.
Next, we wished to evaluate the conservative anchor residues of the otherwise hypervariable epitope NP418-426 (LPFEKSTVM). The relatively conservative NP P419A and P419G substitutions at position 2 of the epitope were both detrimental to viral fitness, indicating that the proline at this position is essential. Amino acid substitutions at position 9 of the epitope, the second anchor residue, yielded interesting results. First, the NP M426A substitution was detrimental to viral fitness. Second, with the conservative NP M426I substitution, the HLA-B*3501 binding motif was retained (16, 23, 56) and viral fitness was not affected to a great extent. Of special interest, HLA-B*3501-positive cells infected with influenza virus A/NL/95-NP M426I were poorly recognized by NP418-426-specific T-cell clones. Since the NP M426I mutant epitope retained its capacity to bind to HLA-B*3501, it may have undergone conformational changes in T-cell receptor contact residues, preventing recognition by CTL, as has been described previously for another HLA-B*3501-restricted epitope (15). Conservative amino acid substitutions at the anchor residues of the epitopes PB1591-599 (VSDGGPNLY), NP44-52 (CTELKLSDY), and NP174-184 (RRSGAAGAAVK) also affected viral fitness. The PB1 D593N substitution in particular was detrimental to viral fitness. Although the conservative NP E46Q substitution resulted in the loss of the anchor residue and would allow the virus to escape from specific CTL, the loss of viral fitness may limit the emergence of this variant in the human population.
Based on the data presented here, we speculate that influenza A viruses display a limited degree of variation in CTL epitopes despite selective pressure on these epitopes mediated by CTL. Functional constraints imposed on influenza virus CTL epitopes may limit efficient escape from CTL and could constitute the Achilles heel of these viruses, limiting the impact of epidemic and pandemic outbreaks of influenza on severe morbidity and mortality.
The authors thank T. M. Bestebroer and M. I. J. Spronken for excellent technical assistance.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»