Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2005, p. 11062-11070, Vol. 79, No. 17
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.17.11062-11070.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute for Molecular Virology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Received 10 January 2005/ Accepted 1 June 2005
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Much of our current understanding of the processes involved in picornavirus RNA replication is based on studies with poliovirus (reviewed in reference 23). Among the described steps are a discrete series of protein-RNA interactions that help regulate genome conversion from translation to replication templates. For example, cellular poly(C)-binding protein and viral polymerase precursor 3CD are known to bind an RNA cloverleaf motif near the 5' end of the poliovirus genome (9, 10, 13, 21). In combination with cellular poly(A) binding protein PABP1, which links to the 3' untranslated region, the intact complex purportedly helps circularize the genome and orient the viral polymerase (3Dpol) for minus-strand initiation (13). Among other obligate steps, viral protein VPg (3B) is uridylylated by 3Dpol to form VPg-pUpU, in reactions templated by an internal cis-acting replication element (cre), which, again, is part of the RNA genome (16, 28, 37).
Recent studies suggest further that VPg uridylylation may not be strictly required for the initiation of minus-strand synthesis, but rather, unmodified VPg may act directly with the 3' untranslated region (19, 20). Regardless, once full-length minus strands have been synthesized, it is generally accepted that for poliovirus, new plus-strand RNA initiation requires the uridylylation of VPg, or VPg-containing precursors, using the internal cre as template. RNA elongation after the VPg-primed reaction results in new, full-length, plus-strand molecules. Multiple or reiterative polymerase initiations on the same minus-strand templates produce distinctive, branched replicative intermediate structures. The new plus strands are released from the complex and they serve as mRNAs for the translation of more viral proteins, as templates for additional rounds of genome replication, or as virion RNAs encapsidated into mature progeny particles.
As elegant as this model is, several of the proposed features in the poliovirus (enterovirus) replication cycle, do not have obvious homologs or analogs among other genera of picornaviruses. Aphthoviruses, cardioviruses, kobuviruses, teschoviruses, and hepatoviruses, for example, lack 5' cloverleaf motifs. They have different 3' untranslated region sequences, and their presumptive cre structures are distributed at various locales in each different genome. The polyprotein processing patterns are also unique for each type of virus, including VPg and its observed precursors. The ability to tease apart the essential characteristics of these parallel replication schemes has been hindered somewhat by the lack of common molecular tools that have proven essential to the poliovirus systems. In particular, the antiviral agent guanidine-HCl is widely recognized as a potent inhibitor of poliovirus replication and is creatively employed in many poliovirus-based experiments.
Guanidine specifically prevents the initiation of minus-strand RNA synthesis (3), thereby allowing an easy experimental separation of poliovirus RNA translation functions from RNA synthesis functions. Moreover, since the action of guanidine is reversible, drug withdrawal can initiate synchronous commencement of RNA replication for in vitro experiments. Guanidine resistance in poliovirus is associated with nucleotide mutations in the 2C gene of the P2 region, and the drug inhibits the ATPase activity of recombinant poliovirus 2C (2, 25, 26). Unfortunately, guanidine does not have equivalent activities against most other picornaviruses, including cardioviruses (15, 27). This specificity is puzzling because the 2C and 3Dpol proteins share definitive sequence and mechanistic similarities among all members of the family.
As an initial probe into the fundamentals of the mengovirus-specific replication scheme, we employed a cell-free replication system based on Krebs-2 cell extracts, similar to that recently described by Yuri Svitkin (32). Akin to the HeLa cell-based systems for de novo poliovirus replication (17), Krebs-2 extracts support all functions necessary for infectious cardiovirus synthesis, including internal ribosome entry site-directed protein translation, polyprotein processing, viral RNA replication, and virion formation (32). The cell-free nature of the reactions permits direct experimental access to every biochemical pathway. In the absence of cellular membranes, drug or antibody additions are also freely manipulated.
We now report use of the Krebs-2 system to characterize the antiviral activity of dipyridamole, one of the few drugs known to affect cardiovirus growth in tissue culture. Dipyridamole is a modified purine with commercially therapeutic applications as an antiplatelet agent (8). It is also a potent inhibitor of mengovirus infectivity to FL and L cells (35). We have traced the source of this inhibition to a reversible, molecular step early in the mengovirus RNA replication pathway. Dipyridamole did not affect internal ribosome entry site-dependent translation or polyprotein processing in vitro or in vivo, and in that regard, it behaved like guanidine in poliovirus replication systems. Dipyridamole is clearly a powerful, practical new reagent that should be extremely useful in subsequent experiments to compare and contrast the specific events in cardiovirus RNA synthesis with those from other picornaviruses.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Drug efficiency (percent inhibition) was defined as the ratio of plaques formed on treated versus untreated cells. Drug reversibility and timing assays were similar, except the infection was with 50 PFU/cell (3 x 106 cells), the liquid medium overlay was replaced as indicated with fresh medium (with or without 80 µM dipyridamole), and the samples were harvested after 8 h of incubation (37°C, under 5% CO2). The cells were subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles and the clarified supernatants were then titrated for infectivity by plaque assay.
Ribozyme cDNAs. The mengovirus replicon pMluz has been described (7). It encodes a firefly luciferase gene (luc) that substitutes for a portion of the viral capsid-coding region in the context of the mengovirus plasmid pMwt. Polymerase T7 transcripts templated by pMluz begin with two 5' nonviral G residues, before the viral genome/reporter, and end on the 3' side, with a poly(A)23-CG sequence (7). To create plasmids that expressed viral transcripts without the exogenous 5' bases, a self-cleaving ribozyme cassette (4, 12) was constructed from overlapping cDNA primers and then engineered into pMluz. Primers P1 to P8 (Table 1) were reacted with T7 polynucleotide kinase (Promega). Complementary pairs, P1+P2, P3+P4, and P7+P8, were combined, denatured (95°C), and allowed to hybridize. The product fragments (three pairs) were mixed, treated with T4 DNA ligase (Promega), and then digested with RsrII and NdeI (New England Biolabs), creating a ribozyme-encoding fragment that could be substituted for the analogous fragment in pMluz. After transformation into Escherichia coli MVII90, plasmid Rz-pMluz was amplified and then screened by sequencing throughout the regions of interest (T7 promoter, ribozyme, 5' end of mengovirus genome). Plasmid Rz*-pMluz, with a point mutation inactivating the ribozyme sequence (highlighted bases in Table 1), was of identical design except primer pair P5'P6 replaced P3'P4 during the construction. Plasmids Rz-pMwt and Rz*-pMwt were also similar except they linked, respectively, the wild-type (Rz) and mutant (Rz*) ribozyme sequences to an intact, infectious pMwt genome sequence.
|
Isolation of Krebs-2 S10 lysates. Krebs-2 ascites cell propagation in mice and the isolation of S10 lysates were as described (32). Briefly, Krebs-2 cell inoculants (0.4 ml), kindly provided by Yuri Svitkin of McGill University, were injected in the peritoneal cavities of mice (6 weeks old, female, BALB/c). After 7 days, the mice were euthanized, the ascites fluids were harvested and then transferred into Earl's balanced salt solution on ice. After two washes with Earl's balanced salt solution, the pelleted cells were suspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium without methionine and incubated with gentle agitation (2 h, 37°C). The suspension was filtered through cheesecloth to remove particulates, and then the cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with HNG buffer (35 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.3, 146 mM NaCl, 11 mM D-glucose). Cell pellets were resuspended in hypotonic buffer (25 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2) and placed on ice (20 min). The cells were broken by Dounce homogenization (15 strokes) and then supplemented with 1/10th volume of concentrated buffer (25 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.3, 1 M KCH3COO, 30 mM MgCl2, 30 mM dithiothreitol). After centrifugation (10,000 x g), aliquots of the supernatants (S10 fraction) were flash frozen on dry ice before storage (80°C).
Protein synthesis, RNA synthesis, and VPg uridylylation in Krebs-2 S10 lysates. Viral RNA (vMwt) was isolated from sucrose-purified virions (29). The particles were disrupted with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, 1%) and proteinase K (20 µg/ml), followed by extraction with phenol-chloroform and precipitation with ethanol. Recombinant viral transcripts were prepared as described for replicon assays. Cardioviral translation and replication in Krebs-2 lysates programmed with these RNAs were essentially as described (32). The lysates (200 µl) were treated with micrococcal nuclease (150 units/ml) in the presence of CaCl2 (75 mM, 20°C, 20 min) before EGTA was added (to 2 mM), to quench the nuclease.
Protein/RNA synthesis reactions contained nuclease-treated lysate (20 µl, or 50% by volume), nucleotides (1 mM ATP, 0.2 mM GTP, 0.2 mM CTP, 0.2 mM UTP), creatine phosphate (10 mM), creatine kinase (0.2 mg/ml), L-amino acids (0.2 mM each, without methionine), salt buffer (75 mM KCH3CO2, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM spermidine), and either virion RNA (0.5 µg) or transcript RNA (1 µg). When protein label was required, the mix was supplemented with [35S]methionine (2 µl, 10 µCi/µl; Amersham), and incubation was for 3 h (32°C), after which Laemmli loading buffer (8 µl, with 1% SDS) was added. Protein bands were visualized after PAGE fractionation and autoradiography. When RNA label was required,
[32P]CTP (1.5 µl, 10 µCi/µl, >3,000 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer) was added to the reaction mix after 4 h of incubation. SDS (to 1%) and proteinase K (to 20 µg/ml) were added 1 h later. The samples were extracted twice with phenol-chloroform, before precipitation with ethanol. RNA products were fractionated by agarose electrophoresis (1% gels in 90 mM Tris-borate, 2 mM EDTA). The labeled bands were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by phosphorimaging. VPg uridylylation was assayed as described (20) with minor modifications. Reaction mixtures programmed with viral RNA were supplemented with
[32P]UTP (5 µl, 10 µCi/µl, >3,000 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer) after 3.5 h of incubation at 32°C. One hour later, replication complexes were collected by centrifugation (16,000 x g for 15 min). The pellets were resuspended in 1x Tricine sample buffer and analyzed by fractionation on Tris-Tricine-polyacrylamide (12%) gels. The labeled bands were visualized by autoradiography and quantitated by phosphorimaging.
Recombinant 3Dpol. Recombinant mengovirus 3Dpol was expressed and isolated using procedures similar to those for poliovirus (11). Craig Cameron, Penn State University, generously provided plasmid pM3D encoding a ubiquitin-linked mengovirus 3Dpol fusion protein. Protein induction after pM3D transformation of E. coli BL21(pCG1) (also provided by Cameron) results in cleavage of the ubiquitin moiety and accumulation of 3Dpol. The transformed cells were grown in 2 x YT broth supplemented with chloramphenicol and kanamycin at 37°C (A600 of 0.1). Isopropylthiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added (to 500 µM) and incubation was continued (3.5 h). The cells were collected by centrifugation, washed twice with TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), before resuspension (to 4 mg/ml) in lysis buffer (100 mM KPO4, 60 µM ZnCl2, 4 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Lysis was by sonication (four times for 30 seconds each).
Polyethyleneime (5%, 0.0534 µl/ml cell lysate) was added and the cell debris was removed by centrifugation (100,000 x g, 30 min at 4°C). Ammonium sulfate was added (314 g/liter) and the insoluble protein was collected by centrifugation (12,000 x g, 30 min, 4°C). The pellet was resuspended (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), dialyzed against buffer C (12 to 14 h,100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 20% glycerol, 60 µM ZnCl2, 0.1% NP-40, 50 mM NaCl) and then applied to a Cibacron blue column (5 ml, Bio-Rad) which had been equilibrated in buffer C. Elution was with a NaCl gradient (50 to 1000 mM). Fractions containing 3Dpol, as observed by gel electrophoresis, were pooled and loaded onto a Q-Sepharose column (5 ml, Bio-Rad). A linear gradient of NaCl (50 to 200 mM) was applied. Fractions containing 3Dpol were pooled, reapplied to a fresh Q-Sepharose column (0.5 ml, Bio-Rad), and then eluted with buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 8.0, 20% glycerol, 60 µM ZnCl2, 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% NP-40, 500 mM NaCl).
The recombinant enzyme was tested in reactions (50 µl) containing 3Dpol protein (1 µg), oligo(G) primer (25 µg), poly(C) template (5 µg),
[32P]GTP (1 µl, 10 µCi/µl, >3,000 Ci/mmol, Amersham), and buffer (50 mM HEPES-KOH, pH 7.5, 10 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM MnCl2, 60 µM ZnCl2, 0.5 mM GTP). Samples were incubated for 30 min (30°C) before the addition of EDTA (to 4 mM). The acid-insoluble incorporation of label was determined (duplicate 5-µl aliquots) by filter assay.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Mengovirus replicons. Drug-induced defects on input RNA translation or on the initiation of RNA synthesis would manifest equivalently in the previous assays as early blocked steps in the viral replication cycle. We previously reported the successful use of a mengovirus replicon in which a luciferase reporter gene (luc) replaced part of the capsid-coding region. This system was used to tease apart the contributions of genome translation and RNA synthesis on the cardioviral growth cycle (7).
Transfection of pMluz RNA into HeLa cells gives a biphasic luciferase response (e.g., Fig. 2A) as protein is first translated from the input transcripts (1 to 3 h), and then from replicated viral RNA (3 to 8 h). Recent work with similar replicons from poliovirus, however, has called this interpretation into question. For poliovirus, the presence of two 5' nonviral guanosine residues, the engineered artifacts of T7 polymerase reactions, was shown to influence the biphasic luciferase response of poliovirus replicons. Alternate replicon transcripts tailored with precise viral 5' ends, through the use plasmid-encoded ribozyme sequences, were found to initiate replication at earlier times, and the lag between input RNA translation and new RNA translation was relatively diminished (12). Before testing dipyridamole with mengovirus replicons, it seemed prudent to first investigate whether the transcript 5' ends would likewise influence analogous assays with cardiovirus sequences.
|
The highly active mengovirus ribozyme replicon was subsequently tested for dipyridamole sensitivity (Fig. 2B). Initially, luciferase was produced from the input RNA at levels similar to non-drug-treated samples, suggesting that initial genome translation was not the step affected by the drug. Clearly, though, dipyridamole prevented the next, replication-dependent phase of protein synthesis, and the drug curve essentially paralleled that of control samples programmed with inactive polymerase (pMwt-Age).
Krebs-2 assays with virion RNA. In 2003, Svitkin and Sonnenberg (32) described a highly effective Krebs-2 lysate system that allowed in vitro examination of all steps in the encephalomyocarditis virus replication cycle. With advice and reagents generously provided by Y. Svitkin, we reproduced this system, and established that when programmed with mengovirion RNA or with Rz-pMwt transcripts, Krebs-2 lysates synthesized at least 108 PFU/ml of infectious mengovirus progeny within 20 h (not shown).
A key feature of any cell-free assay is that viral translation and replication products can be readily labeled and monitored. The addition of [35S]methionine to extracts programmed with mengovirus virion RNA gave the full panel of expected viral precursors and cleavage products (Fig. 3, lane 2). The addition of 80 µM dipyridamole or its solvent, ethanol, did not alter this pattern significantly (Fig. 3, lanes 3 and 4). But, when RNA synthesis was monitored by the addition of [32P]CTP, the drug was clearly inhibitory (Fig. 4). Standard reactions (Fig. 4, lane 1), or standard reactions supplemented with ethanol (Fig. 4, lane 2), gave strong bands of genome RNA as well as replicative intermediate and replicative form complexes. Samples to which 20, 40, or 80 µM dipyridamole had been added (Fig. 4, lanes 4, 5, and 6, respectively), gave sequentially weaker bands, indicating a drug-dependent inhibition of viral RNA synthesis. At 80 µM dipyridamole, single-stranded mengovirus RNA synthesis was inhibited >96%.
|
|
|
|
Since mengovirus replicons also seemed sensitive to exogenous 5' sequences, active (Rz-pMwt) and inactive (Rz*-pMwt) ribozyme segments were linked 5' to recombinant wild-type mengovirus cDNAs (pMwt), and the resulting genome transcripts were tested in Krebs-2 assays for their ability to produce plus- and minus-strand products (Fig. 7). Lysates programmed with Rz-pMwt RNA synthesized large amounts of single-strand product as well as replicative intermediate/replicative form material. When the ribozyme was inactivated, however, a much weaker band of replicative form material was the only product (Fig. 7, lane 2). If indeed the mengovirus polymerase behaves like poliovirus in this regard, it is likely the majority of label in this band is of minus-strand origin (characterization is under way).
|
Dipyridamole does not inhibit 3Dpol elongation. Picornavirus 3Dpol polymerases can bypass normal RNA synthesis initiation events, as well as the requirements for additional host and viral factors, if cell-free reactions are programmed with appropriate template-primer complexes (24). Elongation on oligo(G)-primed, poly(C) templates is an especially efficient activity of recombinant mengovirus 3Dpol (C. Cameron, personnel communication). Full-length mengovirus 3Dpol was expressed from plasmid pM3D in E. coli (11) (C. Cameron, personal communication), purified to >90% homogeneity, and then tested for poly(G) synthesis activity in the presence and absence of dipyridamole. Robust incorporation of [32P]GTP was dependent on the presence of both enzyme and template (Fig. 8). Dipyridamole and its solvent, ethanol, were not inhibitory to these reactions, and if anything, slightly stimulated label incorporation. Consistent with other dipyridamole results, these data point to a genome-dependent RNA synthesis initiation event, as the mechanistic target of the drug.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mengovirus replicon experiments and in vitro assays with Krebs-2 lysates confirmed that viral translation and polyprotein processing were indeed unaffected by the drug. Rather, dipyridamole seemed specifically to inhibit viral RNA synthesis in an unknown, albeit reversible manner. Both minus-strand and plus-strand synthesis was significantly reduced in the Krebs-2 system when the drug was added early in the replication cycle. The presence of the drug also prevented the accumulation of uridylylated VPg, one of the early events in RNA replication. The observed inhibition could not be attributed to defects in RNA elongation, since dipyridamole did not hinder poly(G) polymerase activity by recombinant 3Dpol. We conclude that dipyridamole must interfere with one or more steps in the initiation of RNA synthesis, and moreover, that this interference was not permanent and could be relieved if the drug was removed from replication complexes.
Several molecular functions ascribed to dipyridamole warrant discussion relative to potential antiviral mechanisms. Historically, the drug has seen extensive medical use as a coronary vasodilator and an antithrombic agent, and at one point, under the trade name of Persantin, it was one of the 50 most widely prescribed drugs in the United States (8). Dipyridamole is very effective at inhibiting nucleoside transport into cells, and this is the presumed mechanism for its medical efficacy. Its activity was also evaluated for other applications, including use as an inhibitor of herpes simplex virus reactivation (33) and as a potentiator of the antiviral effects of 3'azido-3'deoxythymidine against human immunodeficiency virus (22). Neither of these effects proved of significantly therapeutic value, but similar experiments did suggest dipyridamole might have additional, modest antiviral effects against human immunodeficiency virus even when administered in the absence of 3'azido-3'deoxythymidine (22). Our mengovirus studies found dipyridamole to be equally effective in infected cells and in vitro replication reactions where nucleoside uptake was not an issue. Therefore, nucleoside transport defects are unlikely to be responsible for the drug's activity against mengovirus. Rather, the mengovirus effects and the 3'azido-3'deoxythymidine-independent activity against human immunodeficiency virus probably originate from some alternate molecular mechanism.
Another dipyridamole activity is the stimulation of prostacyclin synthesis, with a correlate, concentration-dependent enhancement of the action of prostaglandins on cells (18). These fatty acid derivatives are synthesized from arachidonic acid by clooxygenases and help mediate cellular inflammatory responses, including some reactions shown to have minor antiviral effects on adenovirus, parainfluenza virus, and measles virus growth (reviewed in reference 31). While certain prostaglandins can partially inhibit poliovirus replication in cells without affecting viral protein synthesis (5), again, it is unlikely that upregulation of the clooxygenase enzyme is a key factor in dipyridamole inhibition of mengovirus. Our in vitro systems use enucleated cell lysates treated with micrococcal nuclease, where no host-encoded proteins are synthesized. Although it remains a formal possibility that dipyridamole could stimulate an endogenous clooxygenase activity, the reversible effects in our lysate experiments still beg other explanations.
The hypothesis we currently favor derives from a third activity ascribed to dipyridamole, its ability to inhibit phosphodiesterases. Phosphodiesterase 4, for example, a known dipyridamole target, is the major cyclic adenosine-3',5'-monophosphate-metabolizing enzyme in eukaryotic cells. Phosphodiesterase 4 mediates the rate at which cyclic 3',5'-AMP is converted into 5'-AMP (8). It would be surprising if fluctuations in cellular AMP concentrations per se were responsible for the drug-dependent changes in picornaviral RNA synthesis rates. But other phosphodiester events have special roles in the initiation of plus- and minus-strand synthesis for every picornavirus. In particular, 3Dpol-mediated, VPg uridylylation to VPg-pUpU precedes every initiation and is the key step in the linkage of this protein to new RNAs (37).
If dipyridamole were to interfere or even influence the dynamics of this pathway through reaction with 3Dpol, VPg, UTP, or the cre element, one might expect inhibition of initiation events but not elongation events, as in our experiments. Indeed, we have demonstrated that VPg uridylylation is one of the steps inhibited by the presence of dipyridamole. Further experiments are under way to determine the precise molecular components and their mode of action. Regardless of the ultimate mechanism, however, or drug-targeted step, our experiments confirm that dipyridamole is an effective experimental tool which can be wielded like guanidine, to regulate the mengoviral replication cycle, both in cells and in cell-free lysates that reproduce the infectious cycle.
Another conclusion from this work addresses the functional characteristics of the 5' ends of mengovirus template RNAs. In luciferase replicon assays, the translation activities of input transcripts were readily distinguished from those of newly synthesized RNAs. While the slope and height of the exponential phase of luciferase activity were responsive to the 5' context, the timing of the initial lag period was not. In contrast to reports with ribozyme-cleaved poliovirus replicons (12), the initial 3-h lag phase was not eliminated when ribozyme-cleaved mengovirus replicons were compared to those with 2 or 50 heterologous nucleotides at the 5' end. Herold and Andino reported that poliovirus transcripts with authentic 5' ends showed "no initial translation phase of the input viral genome for 2 to 3 h before a switch to a replicative state" (12). Clearly, this is not the case for mengovirus and we suspect the two-phase pattern of luciferase production indicates a time-sensitive trigger that naturally coordinates the onset of RNA synthesis. Encephalomyocarditis virus replicons with defects in the 2A-dependent shutoff of host transcription and translation (e.g., pE-luc-2A
58) have longer lag periods than wild-type replicons, perhaps implicating a feedback signal generated by these processes (1).
The Krebs-2 assays were also sensitive to 5' context, in that virion RNA and Rz-pMwt transcripts replicated and produced high-titer infectious progeny, while other transcripts did not. Virion RNAs are linked by 5' phosphodiester bonds to a tyrosine within VPg. Rz-pMwt transcripts and related replicons terminate with 5' hydroxyl groups as the result of their ribozymes (30). On the other hand, pMwt and Rz*-pMwt transcripts have 5' triphosphates and carry 2 to 50 additional nonviral bases, templated by their plasmids. Since all nonribozyme replicons we have tested seem to come out of the lag phase with similar kinetics and activities, we suspect it might be the triphosphates, and not the extra bases, that contribute to their less effective replication. We now intend to use dipyridamole to tease apart these essential initiation step questions and perhaps explain the crucial 5' recognition features required by mengovirus 3Dpol.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Marchel Hill for her excellent technical assistance with cell cultures and Yuri Svitkin for his generous, repeated gifts of Krebs-2 cells and his invaluable suggestions regarding the activities of the related cell-free system. We also thank Craig Cameron for plasmid pM3D and his expertise related to the preparation of purified, active enzyme.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Mol. Cell. Biol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|