Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 2005, p. 10730-10739, Vol. 79, No. 16
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.16.10730-10739.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
*
Batbayar Tumurbaatar,1,
Junhui Jia,1
Hong Diao,1
Francis Bodola,1
Stanley M. Lemon,1
Wendell Tang,2
David G. Bowen,3
Geoffrey W. McCaughan,3
Patrick Bertolino,3 and
Teh-Sheng Chan1
Departments of Microbiology and Immunology,1 Pathology, Hepatitis Research Center, Sealy Center for Vaccine Development and Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1019,2 AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and Cell Biology, Sydney, Australia3
Received 22 December 2004/ Accepted 4 May 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The body maintains tolerance to many gut-derived antigens (54). Although the mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear, it is thought that immune responses within the liver are associated with tolerance. In the liver, hepatocytes express low levels of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and virtually no immune costimulatory molecules (such as CD80/B7.1, CD86/B7.2, and CD40). These conditions ensure that T cells "ignore" antigens expressed by the parenchymal cells. To mount an efficient immune response, costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells need to engage their ligands on T cells, and this interaction provides a crucial signal permitting the activation and differentiation of T cells into effector cells. In human HCV infection, high levels of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules are expressed on the activated Kupffer cells and hepatocytes, and their levels are also correlated with the extent of intrahepatic inflammation and elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) a biochemical marker of liver injury (10, 37). Despite this association between costimulatory molecules and these clinical parameters of disease, the functional relationship between expression of these molecules and HCV-related liver injury has not been directly examined, partly due to a lack of suitable animal models.
To examine the pathogenesis of HCV in vivo, several groups have established transgenic mice that constitutively express HCV proteins in the liver and have found increased micro- and macrovesicular hepatic steatosis and an increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in these animals (32, 38, 55). However, since the constitutive expression of HCV proteins begins in utero in these mice, they do not develop HCV-specific cellular responses or hepatic inflammation due to immune tolerance to the HCV antigens. To overcome this obstacle, we developed transgenic mouse lineages with inducible expression of HCV structural proteins and/or constitutive expression of the costimulatory molecule CD86/B7.2 in the liver, and we investigated the relationship between costimulatory signaling molecule CD86 expression and HCV-related hepatic inflammation in double-transgenic animals. Using a hydrodynamic-based, nonviral delivery protocol (33), we induced expression of the HCV transgene in mouse liver with Cre DNA recombinase (30) and found that animals coexpressing CD86 developed more pronounced inflammatory responses within the liver. Our results suggest that increased parenchymal antigen presentation conferred by hepatocyte CD86 expression prolongs the presence and augments the functions of effector T cells in the liver, thus contributing to HCV-related liver injury.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Construction of conditional HCV transgenic mouse lines. (A) The transgene construct was prepared by inserting a 1.4-kb spacer that is flanked by two loxP sequences between the promoter and structural genes. A 1.7-kb PCR fragment is detectable with the primer pair P1-P3 in the transgenic mouse. (B) When a recombinant adenovirus carrying the Cre DNA recombinase was injected, the spacer was removed by recombination between the two loxP sequences, as evidenced by the presence of a 400-bp band amplified by PCR using the same primers. Expression of the HCV core protein at 21 kDa in the liver was detected by Western blot analysis.
|
Cre DNA recombinase expression vector. Rearrangement of chromosomally integrated HCV structural genes leading to protein expression was mediated by Cre DNA recombinase from bacteriophage P1 (25). In initial experiments, conditional HCV transgenic mice were induced by infusion via the tail vein of 3 x 109 PFU AdCre, an E1-deleted adenovirus vector carrying the Cre recombinase gene under the control of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early promoter. Two Cre plasmids (pCMVCre and pNLSCre) used for the remaining studies were generated by Brian Sauer (Stowers Institute, Kansas City, MO) and are described in detail elsewhere (30, 47). pCMVCre (pBS185) was constructed by fusing the CMV promoter to the N terminus of Cre (47). For more efficient Cre entry into the nuclei of hepatocytes, we used pNLSCre (pBS391), which expresses a modified Cre molecule with a nuclear localization signal (NLS) (30).
Animal experiments. Hydrodynamic delivery of DNA into mouse liver was carried out as described by Liu et al. (33, 66). Fifty micrograms Cre DNA was diluted in normal saline. A bolus of the solution equivalent to 8 to 10% of the body weight was injected through the tail vein within approximately 5 to 10 s. At days 1, 4 to 7, 14, and 45 postinduction, two to four mice in each group were anesthetized via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 0.25 mg/g pentobarbital. The liver was perfused with 10 to 20 ml of Hanks balanced salts via the portal vein at a flow rate of 10 ml/min with a 21-gauge needle and luer-lock syringe (11). The perfused liver was mechanically disrupted on a 50-mesh, 280-µm stainless steel sieve (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. The cell suspension was filtered through 85-µm nylon mesh and centrifuged at 1,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, centrifuged again, and overlaid on Lympholyte-M density medium (Cedarlane Laboratories, Ontario, Canada). After centrifugation, interface mononuclear cells were harvested, washed, and counted. A portion of the isolated lymphocyte fraction was immediately stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-, phycoerythrin (PE)-, or TriColor-labeled anti-CD3, -CD4, and -CD8 monoclonal antibodies (MAb) (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and analyzed with a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Serum samples were collected and stored at 70°C for ALT measurements. All data were combined from two to four independent experiments.
Determination of Cre-mediated DNA recombination. Total genomic DNA from the mouse tail and liver was extracted using a QIAamp DNA minikit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA). Conventional PCR was used for routine analysis of Cre-mediated recombination of the transgene. For this purpose, a pair of primers, P1 (ACC TTT CCG GCA TGC AAG) and P3 (CTT TGA GGT TTA GGA TTC GTG CTC), were used to identify the transgenic and recombination status (Fig. 1A). Copy numbers of recombined transgene in the liver were assessed by real-time quantitative PCR with the same pair of primers. The RS18 gene, which encodes the small ribosomal protein 18, was used as an internal control for all samples. Standard curves were generated for the unrecombined and recombined transgene with pALB.HCV.S-N.lox and pALB.HCV.S-N, respectively, and copy numbers of both amplicons were normalized to that of RS18. Analysis was carried out on an ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detector with a core reagent kit (QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR). The extracted DNA samples were diluted to 1:10 with Tris-EDTA buffer, and amplification reactions were performed with 5-µl sample aliquots in a 25-µl final volume. Reaction cycles for both the target and RS18 included denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 60°C for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. The standard curve of the threshold cycles versus the template abundance was linear over 6 orders of magnitude, with a regression correlation typically greater than 0.98 for both curves. All data were combined from two independent experiments.
Western blotting and histopathology. For immunoblotting, liver tissues were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and 20 µg of protein extracted from the livers was electrophoresed in a precast 4 to 12% NuPage polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) in a buffer containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate. The proteins were electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and probed with a MAb for HCV core (Anogen, Mississauga, Canada) or polyclonal Ab for HCV E2 (Biodesign, Saco, ME), followed by a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-goat immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL), respectively, and ECL detection reagents (Amersham Pharmacia, Buckinghamshire, England). For evidence of histopathological changes, liver tissues were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Samples were evaluated by three individuals in a randomized, double-blinded fashion and characterized with respect to (i) periportal degeneration and focal necrosis, (ii) intralobular degeneration and focal necrosis, and (iii) portal inflammation (28). Each parameter was scored from 0 (no pathology) to 4 (severe pathology) (64).
Function of hepatic CD86 in vitro.
Hepatocytes from CD86 and BALB/c mice were isolated as described by Isom (22). Briefly, mouse liver was perfused with liver perfusion medium (Invitrogen/GIBCO) and digested with liver digest medium (Invitrogen/GIBCO) at 10 ml/min for 2 to 3 min each. After being filtered through 45-µm (Tetko, Kansas City, MO; no. 3-45/29) and 80-µm (no. 3-80/42) nylon mesh, the cells were washed with hepatocyte wash medium twice, purified by Percoll (Sigma) density gradient separation, and resuspended in HepatoZYME serum-free medium. Hepatocytes (1 x 104/well) were then seeded into 96-well V-bottom plates in duplicate as potential antigen-presenting cells and pulsed with 10 µM of antigenic peptide (hen egg ovalbumin323-339) for 30 min. T cells used in this study were prepared from the spleens of DO11.10 mice (40). In these mice, a majority of CD4+ T cells was specific for the ovalbumin323-339 peptide on the I-Ad molecules. Splenocytes (1 x 106, 3 x 105, 1 x 105, and 3 x 104) were added to the wells containing loaded hepatocytes. After incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 72 h, cells and supernatant were collected and subjected to flow cytometric, gamma interferon (IFN-
), and interleukin-2 (IL-2) analyses (54), respectively.
Statistical analysis. The three-way analysis of variance procedure was used to evaluate the histopathological effects of HCV transgene (factor 1), CD86 transgene (factor 2), and days postinduction (factor 3) independently and interactively. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for post hoc comparisons as warranted. All statistics were computed using NCSS (Number Cruncher Statistical System) software.
|
|
|---|
Nonviral induction of transgene expression. While the adenovirus-based vector is relatively efficient in inducing Cre-mediated DNA recombination, several studies have shown that the viral vector itself can induce strong inflammatory responses in mouse and human livers (24, 48, 52, 62). To avoid this problem, we explored the possibility of delivering Cre using a novel hydrodynamic-based protocol, thereby avoiding the expression of exogenous viral DNA and proteins. This procedure requires a 5- to 10-s intravenous injection of plasmid DNA resuspended in saline equivalent to 8 to 10% of the body weight. This approach has been shown to be efficient in the delivery of DNA into the liver (33, 66). We first injected male and female transgenic mice and their nontransgenic littermates with 50 µg pNLSCre plasmid DNA (30). Following induction, two to four animals were sacrificed at various times postinjection. Tissue samples were collected and analyzed for DNA recombination and protein expression. Since the hydrodynamic injection favors gene delivery to the liver (33, 66), DNA recombination of the HCV transgene took place only in that organ and not in the heart, lungs, spleen, and kidneys, as indicated by the presence or absence of a 400-bp PCR fragment (Fig. 2A). As a result, HCV core as well as E2 protein became detectable in the liver (Fig. 2B and C). The recombined transgenic fragment was clearly detectable by PCR 4 days following pNLSCre injection and persisted through day 45, at which time all of the mice were sacrificed (Fig. 3A). The recombination events mediated by pNLSCre were further quantified by highly sensitive, real-time quantitative PCR. The level of the recombined transgene was no higher than background (32 copies/105 hepatocytes) in HCV transgenic animals 1 day post-pNLSCre injection (Fig. 3B). However, consistent with the results obtained from the qualitative PCR assays (Fig. 3A), there was a 1,000-fold increase in the recombined transgene copy number by day 3, and this remained elevated at very high levels in most animals through day 45. These levels of recombination efficiency were comparable to those mediated by viral vector AdCre (1.1 x 106 copies/105 hepatocytes at day 3) and far superior to those obtained with pCMVCre, a first-generation Cre DNA recombinase that lacks the nuclear localization signal (1.1 x 103 copies/105 hepatocytes at day 3) (45, 46). The reason for low copy numbers in two animals at 14 days postinjection was not clear (Fig. 3B), but it could reflect the possible immune clearance of hepatocytes expressing viral proteins or variations in hydrodynamic injections. These results demonstrate that the hydrodynamic delivery of naked pNLSCre plasmid DNA is effective in inducing chromosomal recombination of HCV transgenic DNA in vivo.
![]() View larger version (56K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Hydrodynamic induction of HCV structural transgenes with a nonviral vector, pNLSCre. (A) Recombination of the HCV transgene took place in the liver following hydrodynamic injection of 50 µg pNLSCre. The 400-bp fragment was detected by PCR with primers P1 and P3 (Fig. 1). (B) High levels of HCV core expression in the liver were detected by Western blotting with an anti-core MAb, followed by HRP-conjugated anti-mouse antibody. Shown are results for a representative HCV transgenic mouse 10 days following pNLSCre injection. (C) HCV E2 expression in the liver at day 3 (lane 3) and day 7 (lane 4) postinduction was detected by Western blotting with an anti-E2 polyclonal Ab, followed by an HRP-conjugated anti-goat IgG. A constitutive HCV transgenic (Tg) mouse (lineage 139) (lane 1) and a nontransgenic mouse (lane 2) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Recombined HCV transgene in HCV transgenic mice and CD86 expression in AT-7.2 transgenic mice. Mice were injected with 50 µg pNLSCre. Genomic DNA was extracted from the liver at the indicated days postinduction. (A) PCR specific for Cre and the HCV transgene was performed as for Fig. 1 and 2. Recombined chromosomal DNA remained detectable through day 45 post-pNLSCre injection. (B) Recombination efficiency of the transgene was confirmed by highly sensitive real-time quantitative PCR (see Materials and Methods). Copy numbers of the recombined transgene were measured after induction. DNA recombination took place at day 3 and persisted through day 45. The values are representative of two real-time PCR assays with similar results. (C) Primary hepatocytes were isolated from the liver of a CD86 transgenic mouse and stained with a PE-conjugated MAb against murine CD86 (clone GL-3) along with a rat IgG2a isotype control MAb. The values are representative of two independent experiments with similar results.
|
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Expression of HCV core and MHC class II as well as hepatic inflammation in double-transgenic mice after gene induction. All mice were injected with 50 µg pNLSCre. (A) Liver protein was extracted at the indicated days. Protein samples (100 µg) were loaded in each lane, and HCV core on a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane was detected with a core-specific MAb. On the left, 6 ng recombinant HCV core (positions 1 to 179) was used as a control. (B) Hepatic MHC class II accumulation following HCV/CD86 coexpression in the liver. Nontransgenic (Tg-) and double-transgenic mice were induced to express HCV structural proteins (or were uninduced). Five days later, the livers were perfused, and hepatocytes were purified and double stained intracellularly with PE-conjugated anti-class II (clone M5/114.15.2) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-CD11c (clone HL3) MAbs. In hepatocytes free from dendritic cell contamination, the mean fluorescence intensities in uninduced nontransgenic (a), induced nontransgenic (b), and induced double-transgenic (c) mice were 23.5, 28.7, and 68.6, respectively. These results are representative of those from two experiments with similar results. (C) Hepatic inflammation following expression of HCV structural proteins. Liver samples were collected and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. Paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The photomicrographs were taken on day 7 after gene induction and are representative of four experiments with similar results (objectives, x20).
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Histopathological changes of mouse livers in response to HCV core induction. Liver tissues were harvested following injection of 50 µg pNLSCre and evaluated for evidence of pathological changes by light microscopic examination of hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained sections. Samples were characterized with respect to (i) periportal degeneration and focal necrosis, (ii) intralobular degeneration and focal necrosis, and (iii) portal inflammation. The extent of pathology was scored from 0 (no pathology) to 4 (severe pathology). The results from two to four experiments are summarized and depict the mean scores and standard deviations for two to four animals at each data point. Tg, transgenic.
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Intrahepatic cellular response to HCV transgene induction in mice. After injection of pNLSCre, mice were sacrificed and liver tissues were collected. (A) Intrahepatic lymphocytes were isolated from the liver perfused with Hanks balanced salts, purified with Lympholyte-M separation medium, and counted. (B to D) The infiltrating lymphocytes were stained with MAb specific for murine CD3, CD4, and CD8 and analyzed with three-color FACS analysis. The results from two to four experiments are summarized, and the data points depict the mean percentages ± standard errors of the means of T-cell subsets among two to four animals.
|
and nearly 1 ng/ml IL-2 (Fig. 7). In contrast, the same T cells failed to form blasts (mean forward scatter, 106.8) or to expand (33.4%) following coculture with normal nontransgenic hepatocytes, and they produced far less IFN-
and IL-2 (2.2 and 0.59 ng/ml, respectively). This effect cannot be attributed to dendritic cells, since CD86+ hepatocyte preparations contained equal or slightly fewer CD11c+ cells (clone HL3) detected by FACS (data not shown). A MAb specific for MHC class II (clone M5-114) nearly completely blocked IL-2 secretion in both CD86+ and CD86 control groups (96.7% and 95.4%, respectively), while a MAb against CD86 (clone GL-1) resulted in a partial block (45.7% and 24.5%, respectively). Overall, these results suggest that increased, parenchymal antigen presentation conferred by hepatocyte CD86 expression augments T-cell effector functions and retention, contributing to HCV pathogenesis in the liver.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Hepatic expression of CD86 results in increased antigen presentation and T-cell activation. Primary hepatocytes were isolated from CD86 transgenic (H-2d) and BALB/c mice. The hepatocytes were pulsed with 10 µM ovalbumin323-339 peptide and cocultured with the splenic lymphocytes from DO11.10 T-cell receptor transgenic mice for 72 h. The values are representative of two experiments with similar results and show average values and standard deviations from duplicate wells.
|
|
|
|---|
Over the last several years, a number of nonviral Cre delivery systems have been reported (23, 33). In preliminary studies, we tested a cell-permeative Cre fusion protein (23, 51) and, like others (43), failed to demonstrate any recombinase activity in the livers of HCV transgenic mice following i.p. injections (data not shown). We also found that a first-generation Cre construct (pCMVCre) (47) did not mediate efficient DNA recombination in mouse liver, due primarily to its failure to gain critical access to the chromosomally integrated transgene within the nucleus (data not shown). In this study, injection of an improved pNLSCre containing nuclear localization signals resulted in efficient Cre translocation to the nucleus and, thus, transgene recombination in the liver (Fig. 2, 3, and 4A). The ensuing immune responses, free from those against adenoviral antigens, afford a cleaner system and a viable alternative to virus-based Cre expression strategies in the mouse (62, 63).
Although HCV-specific CD8+ CTLs are capable of migrating to the liver and producing IFN-
, thereby contributing to viral clearance, they can also cause liver injury (16, 56, 58, 59). Among many factors, the hepatic expression of costimulatory signaling molecules is known to be associated with enduring liver injury. High levels of CD80, CD86, and CD40 are expressed in hepatocytes and activated Kupffer cells in hepatitis C patients, and their levels are closely correlated with those of intrahepatic inflammation and serum ALT (10, 37). Using T-cell receptor transgenic mice, we previously showed that hepatocytes are capable of activating naive T cells but are unable to promote their survival beyond the first 3 days, causing premature T-cell death and tolerance development (3, 4, 8). In this study, we further demonstrated that hepatic CD86 expression resulted in a sustained expansion of CD4+ T cells in the liver and that the increased retention of these cells in the liver was associated with an exacerbation of the necroinflammatory injury in these animals (Fig. 4 to 6). These results are consistent with recent studies in which the liver has been shown to selectively retain large numbers of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells under various experimental conditions (27, 35, 36). Activation and retention of CD8+ T cells in the liver can inflict damage to neighboring hepatocytes through IFN-
and TNF-
(7, 13). In HCV patients, CTLs specific for the virus can kill uninfected hepatocytes through the Fas-mediated lysis of hepatocytes (16). It has been demonstrated that 0.8 to 1.5% of cells presenting HCV antigens suffice to induce lysis of 10 to 29% of bystander cells, suggesting that this mechanism may be operative when only small numbers of hepatocytes are infected in vivo. This mode of killing has also been implicated in CD4+ Th1-mediated liver injury in a murine hepatitis B model (42).
In this study, we asked whether or not costimulatory molecule CD86 contributes to HCV-related liver damage. Our data suggest that augmented, parenchymal antigen presentation conferred by hepatocyte CD86 expression promotes proliferation and differentiation of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells (Fig. 7) and that the altered effector functions and homeostasis of these cells contribute to liver injury (Fig. 4C, 5, and 6). Additional studies suggest that transient expression of the CD80 costimulatory molecule in the livers of these mice is also associated with hepatic inflammatory lesions (data not shown). These results indicate that HCV-related liver injury may depend not only on T-cell-priming events but also on the ability of the local environment to promote T-cell survival. Indeed, the requirement for a local factor in T-cell-mediated tissue injury is not peculiar to the liver. It has been demonstrated that a viral protein expressed in mouse pancreatic ß cells, by itself, cannot induce autoimmune diabetes. However, in transgenic mice coexpressing a costimulatory or local inflammatory molecule, CTLs were activated, and spontaneous insulitis and diabetes occurred (18, 19, 61).
In HCV infection, strong CD4+ T-helper and CD8+ CTL responses are critical in viral clearance or disease progression (17, 26, 49, 50, 60). For reasons that are not clear, the coexpression of HCV and CD86 proteins in the livers of double-transgenic mice elicited neither a major CD8+ T-cell expansion nor persistent ALT elevation (Fig. 6 and data not shown). This lack of a CD8+ expansion could either result from a genetic restriction on recognition of MHC class I epitopes of HCV in this strain of mouse (H-2b/k) or be attributed to insufficient cross-priming due to the absence of viral replication. It has been reported that cross-priming in dendritic cells requires an activation or "licensing" step and that IFN-
, which is induced effectively by viral double-stranded RNA or DNA (6, 14, 34, 53), is an important "licensor." This action is independent of CD40 and MHC class II molecules (hence CD4+ T helper cells) (12, 31). The lack of prolonged transgene expression following a single Cre injection is another notable limitation of this animal model. Recently, transgenic mice carrying a Cre fused to an estrogen receptor have been shown to bypass the need for hydrodynamic Cre injection (20, 57). In these animals, single or multiple i.p. injections of tamoxifen induced efficient and prolonged transgene recombination, without obvious adverse effects, making this induction mode suitable for small-animal models of hepatitis C, such as ours.
In summary, our results demonstrate that hepatocyte CD86 expression can alter effector functions and homeostasis of CD4+ T cells, resulting in liver injury. These data underscore the potential benefits of future immune modulatory therapeutics aimed at minimizing pathogenesis in chronically infected individuals (21, 41, 65).
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI60560, AI53638, and AI40035), the UTMB GRIP program, the Texas Gulf Coast DDC (DK56338), and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.
J.S. and B.T. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»