Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, July 2005, p. 8655-8660, Vol. 79, No. 13
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.13.8655-8660.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology-Immunology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611
Received 15 October 2004/ Accepted 2 March 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Whereas primary infection by EBV is usually asymptomatic during childhood, delayed primary infection can manifest itself in a disease called infectious mononucleosis (21). Whether or not initial infection was symptomatic, the virus subsequently persists in the healthy host for the rest of his or her life as a latent infection of resting memory B cells (38). Based on these observations, a model has been proposed in which the virus uses normal B-cell differentiation processes to establish a persistent infection (3, 38). An important aspect of this model is the germinal center (GC) reaction, in which B cells that encountered a specific antigen with costimulatory signals (CD40 or interleukin-4 receptor engagement) proliferate vigorously and modify their rearranged V genes by somatic hypermutations (25); however, cross-linking of the B-cell receptor (BCR) in the absence of those costimulatory signals induces anergy or apoptosis (35, 40). Only B cells carrying antigen receptors with improved affinity survive and are selected into the pool of memory B cells (31). In the model of persistent infection, EBV primarily infects naïve B cells and induces their proliferation (38). When such cells subsequently undergo a GC reaction and differentiate into memory cells, the virus gains access to the memory B-cell pool, the site of viral persistence. In addition, B-cell fate is predominantly controlled by signals through the BCR. Potentially autoreactive B-cell clones can be purged from the repertoire by the process of clonal deletion (apoptosis) that occurs at various stages during B-cell development in the bone marrow and GC. Latent membrane protein 2A (LMP2A) blocks the accumulation of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, calcium mobilization, and EBV reactivation from B cells by BCR cross-linking (18, 32, 33). However, little is known about the effect of LMP2A on the BCR-induced apoptosis in B cells and specifically the effect of LMP2A on EBV reactivation in forms of EBV latency observed in the human host. To further clarify the function of LMP2A in cell survival and EBV latency in GC B cells with limited viral gene expression, we investigated LMP2A-expressing Ramos cell lines. Ramos is an EBV-negative B-cell line that resembles GC B cells (20). In addition, LMP2A-expressing Akata cell lines were also investigated. Akata cells have been used in various studies as a model for studying the mechanisms involved in EBV reactivation and apoptosis by ligation of surface immunoglobulin G (IgG) and express only EBNA1 in readily detected levels (6, 7, 19, 22, 39).
LMP2A and genistein inhibit BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and apoptosis in Ramos cells. To assess the effect of LMP2A on BCR-induced apoptosis, previously constructed LMP2A-expressing Ramos cells and vector control cells were used (12). Ramos cells have been used in various studies as a model for studying the mechanisms involved in apoptosis by ligation of surface IgM, a component of BCR (1, 9, 23). To verify that LMP2A expression did not result in any change in surface levels of IgM, IgM expression was analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Caliber; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson) in parental, two vector control, and three LMP2A-expressing Ramos cell clones. For all cell clones tested, the levels of surface IgM were similar (data not shown).
We then examined the effect of LMP2A on BCR-induced cell death in parental, vector control, and LMP2A-expressing Ramos cells using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrasodium bromide (MTT) assay. Inhibition of cell viability of parental, vector control, and LMP2A-expressing Ramos cells by BCR ligation was explored either 24 h or 48 h following anti-IgM antibody treatment. In parental and vector control Ramos cells, BCR ligation resulted in cell viability of approximately 60% or 40% of untreated parental or vector control cells (set at 100%) 24 h or 48 h posttreatment, respectively (data not shown). Expression of LMP2A resulted in an approximately 20% increase in cell viability for both times following anti-IgM antibody treatment (data not shown).
Caspase activation is an important element in the apoptotic signaling pathway, activation of caspase 3 is increased in BCR-induced apoptosis in Ramos cells, and the cleavage of one of its substrates, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), has been used as an indicator of this activity (1, 8, 28). We examined whether LMP2A inhibits BCR-induced apoptosis by DNA fragmentation (14) and cleavage of PARP (28) using flow cytometry and Western blotting (12) in parental, vector control, and LMP2A-expressing Ramos cells (Fig. 1A and 1B). BCR stimulation induced DNA fragmentation and cleavage of PARP in parental and vector control Ramos (sub-G1 populations of 15.9% and 16.5%, respectively) at 24 h and (sub-G1 populations of 19.6% and 19.0%, respectively) at 48 h in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1A). LMP2A partially inhibited the BCR-induced DNA fragmentation and cleavage of PARP at both 24 h (a greater-than-twofold reduction in apoptotic cells, 16.5% to 6.7%) and 48 h (a greater-than-twofold reduction in apoptotic cells, 19.0% to 7.9%). To verify the DNA fragmentation and cleavage of PARP by BCR ligation were dependent on caspase activity in Ramos cells, cells were pretreated with zVAD-fmk (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), a broad caspase inhibitor and, as expected, DNA fragmentation and PARP cleavage were blocked by the addition of zVAD-fmk (Fig. 1C and 1D).
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. LMP2A inhibits BCR-induced DNA fragmentation and cleavage of PARP in Ramos cells. (A) Cells were seeded at 3 x 105 cells/ml, and cells were treated without (control) or with 35 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody ( IgAb) for 24 h or 48 h. Cells were analyzed for DNA content by propidium iodide (PI) staining and flow cytometry. Gates employed to ascertain cell cycle distribution and the percentage of cells with a sub-G1 (<G1) and G2/M DNA content are shown. These data are representative of three experiments. (B) PARP cleavage was analyzed by immunoblotting with a specific anti-PARP antibody. The full-length 113-kDa and 89-kDa cleaved PARP proteins are indicated. The amount of protein loaded in each lane was assessed by rehybridization of the filter with a specific antibody for human GAPDH. P, parental; V, vector control; 2A, LMP2A expressing. (C) DNA fragmentation and (D) evaluation of cleavage of PARP. Cells (3 x 105/ml) were preincubated for 1 h with or without zVAD-fmk (50 µM), and cells were then treated with 35 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody. After 24 h of incubation, cell cycles and PARP cleavage were analyzed as described in the legend to panel B. The amount of protein loaded in each lane was assessed by rehybridization of the filter with a specific antibody for human GAPDH.
|
![]() View larger version (67K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. LMP2A or genistein inhibits BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation, DNA fragmentation, and cleavage PARP in Ramos cells. (A) Parental (P), vector control (V), and LMP2A-expressing (2A) Ramos cells (1 x 106/ml) were treated without (control []) or in the presence of 35 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody ( IgM Ab) for the indicated times (1, 5, or 10 min). (B) Cells (1 x 106/ml) were preincubated for 30 min with various concentrations of genistein, and then cells were treated with 35 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody for 10 min. Equal amounts of protein from the respective cells were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The levels of expression of phosphorylated tyrosine were determined by immunoblotting. (C) DNA fragmentation and (D) evaluation of cleavage of PARP. Cells (3 x 105/ml) were preincubated for 30 min with or without genistein, and cells were then treated with 35 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody. After 24 h of incubation, cell cycles and PARP cleavage were analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. The amount of protein loaded in each lane was assessed by rehybridization of the filter with a specific antibody for human GAPDH.
|
To investigate the relationship between BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation, apoptosis, and EBV reactivation, we compared the effects of genistein and LMP2A on BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation, apoptosis, and EBV reactivation in Akata cells. In these studies, apoptosis was monitored by flow cytometry and the induction of PARP cleavage, expression of the EBV immediate-early BZLF1 protein product ZEBRA (5, 43), and expression of early lytic antigens (EA) (32) were monitored by Western blotting (Fig. 3). BCR ligation induced apoptosis and cleavage of PARP in parental and vector control Akata cells (sub-G1 populations of 18.0% and 19.0%, respectively) at 24 h (Fig. 3A and 3B). LMP2A partially inhibited the BCR-induced apoptosis at 24 h (a greater-than-twofold reduction in apoptotic cells, 19.0% to 9.7%) and almost completely blocked PARP cleavage (Fig. 3A and 3B). In addition, BCR ligation induced ZEBRA and EA expression in parental and vector control Akata cells and LMP2A partially inhibited BCR-induced ZEBRA and EA expression in Akata cells (Fig. 3C). Similar to Ramos cells, the amount of genistein to get a similar reduction of tyrosine phosphorylation following BCR ligation to the LMP2A-expressing Akata cells was 50 µg/ml (data not shown). Treatment of Akata cells with 30 or 50 µg/ml genistein partially inhibited BCR-induced apoptosis (18.0% to 11.8% or 18.0% to 10.0%, respectively) and BCR-induced cleavage of PARP (Fig. 3A and 3B). Genistein is a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation and oncogenesis in animal and human cells (4, 10). In contrast to the Ramos cells, there was more PARP cleavage with genistein in Akata cells (Fig. 3B). Genistein-mediated inhibitory effects did not go beyond these values if higher concentrations of genistein or longer treatments were used (data not shown), and the treatment of LMP2A-expressing Akata cells with genistein was no different from results with untreated LMP2A-expressing Akata cells (data not shown). Since zVAD-fmk does not block EBV reactivation but does block apoptosis by BCR ligation in EBV-positive LMP2A-negative BL cell line, Mutu-I (19), we examined the effect of zVAD-fmk on the BCR-induced apoptosis and ZEBRA expression in Akata cells. As might be expected, zVAD-fmk did not block BCR-induced ZEBRA expression (Fig. 3C) but did block BCR-induced apoptosis and cleavage of PARP in Akata cells (Fig. 3D and 3E). In addition, to verify that the zVAD-fmk-mediated antiapoptotic effects were not through the inhibition of BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation, we examined the effect of zVAD-fmk on the BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation in Akata cells. zVAD-fmk did not block BCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation in Akata cells (Fig. 3F).
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. LMP2A or genistein blocks BCR-induced DNA fragmentation, cleavage of PARP, and EBV reactivation. (A) DNA fragmentation and evaluation of cleavage of PARP. Parental (P), vector control (V), and LMP2A-expressing (2A) Akata cells (5 x 105/ml) were preincubated for 30 min with or without genistein, and cells were then treated with 40 µg/ml anti-IgG antibody ( IgG Ab). After 24 h of incubation, cell cycle analyses and PARP cleavage were analyzed as described in the legend to Fig. 1. (B) EBV reactivation. Cells (5 x 105/ml) were preincubated for 30 min with or without genistein (G; 50 µg/ml), and cells were then treated with 40 µg/ml anti-IgG antibody. After 24 h of incubation, the expression of ZEBRA (38 kDa) and EA (52 kDa and 55 kDa) was analyzed by immunoblotting with a specific anti-ZEBRA antibody or with human EBV serum reactive with EBV early antigens. The amount of protein loaded in each lane was assessed by rehybridization of the filter with a specific antibody for human GAPDH. (C) EBV reactivation, (D) DNA fragmentation, and (E) cleavage of PARP with zVAD-fmk treatment. Cells (5 x 105/ml) were preincubated for 1 h with or without zVAD-fmk (50 µM), and cells were then treated with 40 µg/ml anti-IgG antibody. After 24 h of incubation, cell cycles and the expression of ZEBRA were analyzed as described in the legends to Fig. 1 and panel B. The amount of proteinloaded in each lane was assessed by rehybridization of the filter with a specific antibody for human GAPDH. (F) Tyrosine phosphorylation with zVAD-fmk treatment. Cells (1 x 106/ml) were preincubated for 1 h with or without zVAD-fmk (50 µM) followed by treatment with 35 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody for 10 min. Equal amounts of protein from the respective cells were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The levels of expression of phosphorylated tyrosine was determined by immunoblotting.
|
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. PMA and calcium ionophore A23187 induce apoptosis and EBV reactivation in LMP2A-expressing Ramos and Akata cells. (A) Parental (P), vector control (V), and LMP2A-expressing (2A) Ramos and Akata cells (1 x 106/ml) were treated without (control []) or with of 35 µg/ml anti-IgM antibody or 40 µg/ml anti-IgG antibody for the indicated times (1, 5, or 10 min). Equal amounts of protein from the respective cells were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was detected with anti-phospho MAPK antibody. Upper and lower arrows indicate ERK1 and ERK2, respectively. The lower panels show equal loading of proteins and the expression of total ERK (ERK1/2). (B) DNA fragmentation, evaluation of cleavage of PARP, and (C) EBV reactivation. Parental (P), vector control (V), and LMP2A (2A)-expressing Ramos (3 x 105/ml) and Akata (5 x 105/ml) cells were treated with 20 ng/ml PMA and 7.5 µM A23187. After 24 h of incubation, cell cycles, PARP cleavage, and the expression of ZEBRA and EA were analyzed as described in the legends to Fig. 1 and Fig. 3.
|
GC reactions may be important for the establishment of EBV latency and persistence and the development of EBV-associated malignancies. It has been proposed that GC passage may be an important step in the strategy of EBV to establish latency in the memory B-cell compartment (3). According to this model, during initial EBV infection, recruitment of EBV-infected naïve B cells into a GC reaction allows the EBV-infected cells to enter the memory compartment (3). The prevention of the induction of apoptosis and the activation of lytic replication, as observed in the current study, are likely key roles for LMP2A in allowing EBV-infected naïve B cells to transit into the pool of long-lived memory B cells. In addition, disruption of the physiologic balance between cell proliferation and death is a universal feature of all cancers. It is interesting to note that the three main types of EBV-associated B-cell lymphomas, Burkitt's lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, and posttransplant lymphomas are predominantly derived from GC B cells or atypical survivors of the GC reaction in most, if not all, cases, indicating that EBV-infected GC B cells are at particular risk for malignant transformation (24).
Previously, we have shown LMP2A promotes cell survival of B cells through the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt (12). In this study, we have further shown that LMP2A also promotes cell survival through the inhibition of BCR signal transduction. The protection is not complete and is likely a result of lower expression of LMP2A in the cell lines we tested or incomplete inhibition of signal transduction through the BCR. These studies further highlight how LMP2A regulates EBV latency and persistence through the manipulation of normal signaling pathways in EBV-infected cells. Finally, the prevention of BCR-induced apoptosis by LMP2A is likely key in the development of EBV-associated cancers and may play a role in the development of other diseases in the human host that result from altered immune function.
We thank members of the Longnecker laboratory for help with these studies.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»