Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2005, p. 7860-7867, Vol. 79, No. 12
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.12.7860-7867.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Hans Christian Spangenberg,1,
Christoph Neumann-Haefelin,1
Elisabeth Panther,1
Simonetta Urbani,2
Carlo Ferrari,2
Hubert E. Blum,1
Fritz von Weizsäcker,1 and
Robert Thimme1*
Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg,Germany,1 Division of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, University of Parma, Parma, Italy2
Received 12 October 2004/ Accepted 7 February 2005
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
) production and in vitro proliferation (14, 47). While the mechanisms responsible for the dysfunctions of HCV-specific T cells in chronically infected patients remain unclear, recent studies suggest a major contribution of regulatory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (1, 2, 9, 36). Currently, the best-characterized regulatory T cells are CD4+CD25+ T cells (30). These cells recognize peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex class II molecules and can suppress host immune responses and modulate immune responses in the setting of autoimmune diseases, allergy, transplantation, infectious diseases, and antitumor immunity (33, 34). Two major populations of CD4+CD25+ cells can be distinguished: naturally occurring regulatory T cells (Tregs) and induced Treg cells. Naturally occurring Treg cells consist of CD4+ cells that mature in the thymus to regulatory T cells. They represent 5 to 10% of peripheral CD4+ T cells and constitutively express CD25. Induced Treg cells have acquired their suppressive activity during activation in vitro or in vivo and are derived from CD4+CD25 T cells (4, 45). The mechanisms underlying the suppressive functions of Treg cells are not completely understood. Some studies have indicated that direct cell-cell contact is required whereas others have suggested that cytokines such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) may play an important role in the suppressive function of Treg cells (17, 29, 30, 34).
An increasing number of studies indicates a potential role of Treg cells in the control of virus-specific T-cell responses during acute and chronic viral infections (27). For example, the impairment of IFN-
secretion of CD8+ T cells by Treg cells has been described during persistent retroviral infection in mice, whereas proliferative capacity of virus-specific CD8+ T cells was unaffected (9). Recent studies have also suggested that Treg cells suppress virus-specific CD8+ T-cell effector functions in chronic human viral infections such as HCV, human immunodeficiency virus, and cytomegalovirus (1, 5, 19, 36).
In this study, we show on a single epitope level using well-described HLA-A2 epitopes and tetramer technology that proliferation of virus-specific CD8+ T cells is inhibited by Treg cells in a dose-dependent manner, that this suppression requires direct cell-cell contact, that this inhibition is independent of interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß), that it is not restricted to virus-specific CD8+ T cells targeting the persisting virus, and that the suppression of virus-specific CD8+ T cells seems to be specific for chronic infection since the degree of suppression varies significantly between patients with chronic HCV infection versus persons with resolved HCV infection and healthy blood donors.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Patient data
|
Dynabeads. Depletion of CD4+ cells with Dynabeads was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, up to 107 cells were resuspended in 1 ml PBS containing 1% fetal bovine serum (FCS); 144 µl Dynabeads per 107 cells were washed two times with 1 ml PBS containing 1% FCS and transferred to the resuspended cells. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C under slow rotation, followed by separation through a Dynal MPC magnet.
MicroBeads.
PBMC were incubated for 10 min with 90 µl of MACS buffer (PBS, pH 7.2, containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin [BSA] and 2 mM EDTA) and 10 µl CD4+ T-cell biotin-antibody cocktail (antibody against CD8, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD36, CD56, CD123, T-cell receptor
/
, and glycophorin A) per 107 cells. Cells were washed and incubated with 20 µl antibiotin MicroBeads per 107 cells. After 15 min of incubation cells were washed, resuspended in MACS buffer and applied to a magnetic column (LD) on a MidiMACS separation unit. Unlabeled CD4+ cells as well as labeled CD4-depleted PBMC were collected. Cell populations were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis and were 90 to 99% pure (data not shown).
CD25 selection. The CD4+ cell population was separated into CD4+CD25 and CD4+CD25+ (Treg) cells with anti-CD25 MicroBeads. Cells were incubated for 15 min in 90 µl MACS buffer and 10 µl anti-CD25 MicroBeads per 107 cells. After washing, cells were resuspended in MACS buffer and applied to an MS column on a MiniMACS separation unit. Both resulting populations were collected. The purity of the CD4+CD25+ T cells ranged from 82 to 97% (data not shown).
Synthetic peptides. HCV-derived peptides previously shown to be HLA-A2-restricted HCV epitopes were synthesized with a free N and C terminus (Biosynthan, Berlin, Germany). The amino acid sequences of the HLA-A2-restricted HCV and influenza virus epitopes are shown in Table 2.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. HLA-A2-restricted epitopes
|
Tetramer staining. We blocked 0.2 to 0.3 x 106 cells per well with immunoglobulin G1 pure (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA) for 20 min and stained with anti-CD8-phycoerythrin (CD8 PE, Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA or CD8 Cy7-PE, BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA) antibody for 20 min on a 96-well plate at 4°C. Cells were washed three times with PBS containing 1% FCS and incubated with allophycocyanin (APC)-conjugated HLA-A2 tetramers (National Institutes of Health tetramer facility, Atlanta, MD, for HCV, and ProImmune, Oxford, United Kingdom, for influenza virus) corresponding to the HCV and influenza virus peptides as shown in Table 2. Incubation was performed at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 20 min. Cells were washed three times and fixed in 100 µl CellFIX (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA) per well.
Intracellular IFN-
staining.
Procedures were performed essentially as described previously (7). Briefly, cells (0.2 x 106 per well, 96-well plate) were stimulated with peptides (10 µl/ml) in the presence of 50 U/ml human recombinant IL-2 (Hoffmann La Roche, Inc., Basel, Switzerland) and 1 µl/ml brefeldin A (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA). After 5 h incubation (37°C, 5% CO2), cells from each well were blocked and stained with antibodies against CD8 (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Prior to staining with intracellular antibodies against IFN-
(BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA), cells were fixed and permeabilized by adding Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA). Cells were washed three times and fixed in 100 µl CellFIX (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA) per well.
CFSE. We incubated 107 cells (CD4-depleted PBMC) with 5 µmol/liter CFSE (5- and-6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 10 min at 37°C (24). After incubation, cells were washed three times with complete medium and cultured in the presence of CD4+CD25+ cells as indicated. Stimulation was performed as described above. Cells were stained with CD8 Cy7-PE and APC-conjugated HLA-A2 tetramers or CD4-APC antibody.
Transwell assay and cytokine neutralizing assays. CD4-depleted PBMC were cultured with or without CD4+CD25+ cells together in one well or separated through a microporous membrane with 0.4 µm pore size (Transwell, Corning Inc., Acton, MA). In the transwell assay, the CD4-depleted PBMC were put into the outer compartment of a 24-well plate, the Treg cells into the inner compartment. For neutralizing assays, CD4-depleted PBMC were cultured with CD4+CD25+ cells in the presence of 0.5 µg/ml mouse anti-human IL-10 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), 10 µg/ml of chicken anti-human TGF-ß (R&D systems), or isotype controls. Culture, stimulation and staining procedures were performed as described above.
Antibodies. CD8-PE, CD4-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), CD4-APC, CD25-PE (all Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) antibodies as well as CD8-Cy7-PE, isotype FITC, PE, APC, and Cy7-PE (BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA) were used according to the manufacturers' instructions.
Statistical analysis and tetramer calculation. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. All tetramer data are shown as the percentage of tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells in relation to all CD8+ T cells. To express the percentage of CD4+CD25+ cell-mediated inhibition after 7 days in culture (as shown in Fig. 5) the following calculation was performed: 100 (percentage of tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells in the presence of CD4+CD25+ cells divided by the percentage of tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells in the presence of CD4+CD25 cells) x 100.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Inhibition of HCV and influenza virus-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation by Treg cells in chronically HCV-infected patients and healthy blood donors. (A) T-cell lines from HCV-infected patients were tested for Treg-mediated suppression (ratio 3:1) of HCV-specific (patients C1 [two epitopes], C2, C3, and C4) and influenza virus-specific (patients C1, C2, C3, C4, and C5) CD8+ T-cell proliferation after 7 days of antigen-specific stimulation by tetramer staining. To calculate the percentage of CD4+CD25+ cell-mediated inhibition after 7 days in culture the following formula was used: 100 (percentage of tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells in the presence of CD4+CD25+ cells divided by the percentage of tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells in the presence of CD4+CD25 cells) x 100. Patients with resolved HCV infection and healthy blood donors were tested in the same way for Treg-mediated suppression of HCV-specific (patients R1, R2 [two epitopes], R3, R7, and R8 [two epitopes]) and influenza virus-specific (patients R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6 and healthy blood donors) CD8+ T-cell proliferation. Importantly, a significant difference was observed between the inhibition of HCV-specific and influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cells in chronically HCV-infected patients compared to patients with resolved HCV infection and healthy blood donors (only influenza virus). (B) Frequency of CD4+CD25+ T cells in the peripheral blood of chronically HCV-infected patients, patients with resolved HCV infection, and healthy blood donors.
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Depletion of CD4+ cells enhances HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. Tetramer staining of a T-cell line after 7 days in culture. PBMC (white bars) and PBMC depleted of CD4+ cells (black bars) were stimulated with HCV peptides and cultured for 7 days. In all cases, in vitro stimulated T-cell lines showed an enhanced expansion after depletion of CD4+ cells.
|
staining was performed to test the effect of both CD4+ populations on the function of CD8+ cells. Treg cells also suppressed peptide-specific IFN-
production of the expanded cells, whereas phorbol myristate acetate-stimulated IFN-
production was largely unaffected (data not shown). Taken together, our CD4 depletion (Fig. 1) and coculture experiments (Fig. 2) suggest that the CD8+ T-cell-mediated immune response to HCV is significantly limited by the action of Treg cells.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell response. (A) PBMC depleted of CD4+ cells were cultured alone (grey bars), in the presence of CD4+CD25 (black bars) or CD4+CD25+ (white bars) for 7 days. Cells were stained with HLA-A2 tetramers. (B) PBMC depleted of CD4+ cells were cultured alone, in the presence of CD4+CD25 or CD4+CD25+ for 7 days. Representative density plots of cells stained with tetramer and anti-CD8 are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Treg cells inhibit proliferation of HCV specific tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells. (A) CD4-depleted PBMC were stimulated with HCV peptide 3 prior to culture with decreasing numbers of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (CD4-depleted PBMC: Treg cells). After 7 days in culture, cells were tested for virus-specific responses by tetramer staining. (B) CD4-depleted PBMC were labeled with CFSE- and stimulated with HCV peptide 3 prior to culture with high (ratio 3:1) or low (ratio 100:1) numbers of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Representative histograms are shown. The cells are gated on CD8+ HCV tetramer positive cells.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Treg cell-mediated suppression is cell-cell contact dependent but independent of IL-10 and TGF-ß. (A) PBMC were depleted of CD4+ cells and cultured alone (left), in the presence of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells but separated through a microporous membrane (no cell-cell contact) (middle), and unseparated together in one well (cell-cell contact) (right). (B) Addition of neutralizing antibodies against IL-10 and TGF-ß had no effect on the suppressive capacity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. Data are the means of duplicate wells.
|
Enhanced suppression of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation in chronically HCV-infected patients compared to patients with resolved HCV infection or healthy blood donors. To determine the specificity of the Treg-mediated suppression of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells in chronically HCV-infected patients, we compared the suppressive effects of Treg cells on the proliferative capacity of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells versus influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cells in chronically HCV-infected patients. For these experiments, CD4+CD25+ Treg cells as well as CD4+CD25 cells were purified from the PBMC of five chronically HCV-infected patients, five persons with resolved HCV infection, and five healthy blood donors. These cells were added back to the CD4-depleted PBMC prior to peptide stimulation. Interestingly, as shown in Fig. 5A, the suppression of influenza virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses was similar to the suppression of HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell responses. These results suggest that the Treg-mediated suppression of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses is not limited to the persisting virus.
Next, we tested if the suppression of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses is specific for chronic HCV infection. To address this issue we analyzed the Treg-mediated suppression of HCV- and influenza virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in persons with resolved HCV infection (Table 1) and of influenza virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in healthy blood donors. Interestingly, the Treg-mediated suppression of both HCV (P = 0.018) and influenza virus (P = 0.028)-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation was significantly less in individuals with resolved HCV infection. In addition, suppression of influenza virus-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation in healthy blood donors was comparable to that of persons with resolved HCV infection and less compared to chronically HCV-infected patients (P = 0.018) (Fig. 5A). These results suggest that chronic HCV infection leads to an expansion of Treg cells that suppress antiviral CD8+ T-cell responses irrespective of their antigen specificity. In this regard, it is also important to note that higher numbers of CD4+CD25+ cells were detectable in chronically HCV-infected patients compared to persons with resolved HCV infection or healthy blood donors (Fig. 5B).
|
|
|---|
Our study shows at a single epitope level with well-described HLA-A2 epitopes that CD4+CD25+ T cells contribute to the dysfunction of virus-specific CD8+ T cells, such as proliferation and IFN-
production, during chronic HCV infection. Indeed, by investigating the Treg-mediated suppression of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells on a single-cell basis with CFSE staining, we could show that proliferation is inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, we showed that Treg-mediated inhibition of HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation requires direct cell-cell contact and is independent of IL-10 and TGF-ß.
The biological role of regulatory T cells in chronic HCV infection is further supported by our observation that regulatory T cells from patients recovered from HCV infection exhibited significantly less suppressive activity. These results support the hypothesis that chronic viral infection leads to the induction of suppressive Treg cells that inhibit antiviral immune responses (1, 16, 25, 36). The high frequency of CD4+CD25+ T cells observed in chronically HCV-infected patients further suggests an important role for regulatory T cells in HCV persistence (36) (Fig. 5B). Indeed, the generation of adaptive regulatory T cells may be a normal process that occurs to prevent immunopathological damage and thereby contributes to viral persistence. It is important to note that although CD25 is expressed on most regulatory T cells, it is not specific since it can also be expressed on activated CD4+ T cells. Recently, Foxp3 has been shown to be a good marker for CD4+CD25+ T cells in mice, however, its relevance in humans has not been clearly defined so far (10, 28).
Importantly, our results indicate that the Treg-mediated suppression in chronically HCV-infected patients is not restricted to HCV-specific CD8+ T cells but also involves other virus-specific CD8+ T cells. Indeed, we observed a similar suppression of HCV- and influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cells in chronically HCV-infected patients (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the suppression of influenza virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses was significantly less in persons with resolved HCV infection and healthy blood donors. These results suggest that chronic HCV infection may lead to an unspecific activation and expansion of naturally occurring Treg cells or the induction of antigen-specific Treg cells (38, 39, 46) that regulate immune responses not only towards the ligands they were selected for but also towards other antigens in a bystander manner. This possibility is supported by results from in vitro models showing that Treg cells require activation via their T-cell receptor to become suppressive, but once activated, they can perform their suppressor function completely nonspecifically (15, 42). In addition, Suvas et al. (37) observed that acute herpes simplex virus infection resulted in enhanced Treg function, leading to the suppression of CD8+ T-cell responses to both viral and unrelated antigens and indicating an antigen-nonspecific bystander inhibition of CD8+ T cells.
It is important to note that the similar suppression of HCV- and influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cells observed in vitro may not necessarily reflect the situation in vivo. Indeed, it is well conceivable that Treg cells may be activated and perform their suppressive effects in vivo primarily in compartments with high antigen load, such as the virus-infected liver. This would ensure that the suppressive activity is limited to the biologically important compartment. Indeed, the accumulation of suppressive Treg cells at the site of disease has already been demonstrated in other models (3, 13, 35). Thus, the ratio of virus-specific CD8+ T cells versus CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells that is required for a strong suppression (ratios 3:1 to 10:1, Fig. 3) in our study might indeed mirror the intrahepatic situation. In order to address this important question in chronic HCV infection, a further characterization of the function and phenotype of Treg cells in the liver of chronically HCV-infected patients is needed.
The data of the present paper suggest that the Treg-mediated suppression of HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell functions is enhanced in the chronic phase of infection. Indeed, by comparing the Treg-mediated suppression of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells in patients with chronic versus persons with resolved HCV infection, we observed a significantly lower suppression of HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation in persons with resolved HCV infection despite using the same number of CD4+CD25+ T cells. These results suggest that the different degrees of suppressive activity of Treg cells may depend on numerous yet unknown factors that are induced during chronic HCV infection. Thus, our findings suggest that the Treg-mediated impairment of HCV-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation and IFN-
secretion is specific for the chronic phase of infection.
These observations are in agreement with previous reports describing impaired effector functions of HCV-specific CD8+ T cells in chronically infected patients (14, 43, 47). It is important to note that dysfunctions can also be observed in acutely infected patients. However, most studies have suggested that the impaired CD8+ T-cell effector functions are only transient during acute resolving infection (23, 41, 44) because HCV-specific CD8+ T cells can progressively improve their function in patients with self-limited hepatitis C, while the CD8 function remains persistently depressed in subjects with a chronic evolution (44).
Our finding that depletion of CD4+ cells leads to an increase of virus-specific CD8+ T cells (Fig. 1) is somewhat paradoxical since it is widely assumed that CD4+ cells are required for the priming, induction, and maintenance of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses (18). Several groups have shown that peripheral and intrahepatic HCV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses are associated with viral clearance in acutely infected humans and chimpanzees (8, 11, 26, 40). In addition, a recent depletion study of CD4+ cells in chimpanzees has clearly demonstrated that CD4+ cells are required for effective antiviral CD8+ T-cell immunity since HCV persistence and immune evasion occurred in the absence of CD4+ T-cell help in two previously immune animals (12). While these studies support an important role for CD4+ T cells in the outcome of HCV infection, they have been performed in acutely infected patients or chimpanzees.
By contrast, our study focused on chronic HCV infection where HCV-specific CD4+ T-cell responses are usually weak, monospecific, and dysfunctional (43). Our results favor a model in which HCV-specific CD4+ cells have two very different functions during the course of HCV infection. In the acute phase of infection, CD4+ helper T cells contribute to the induction and maintenance of a functional CD8+ T-cell response. In the chronic phase, however, Treg cells suppress virus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses and thereby help the virus to persist. In future studies it will be important to determine at what time point during infection Treg cells become active in HCV-infected patients. It is intriguing to speculate, however, that the induction of Treg cells is an early event that may be responsible for the early decrease of virus-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses observed in some acutely infected patients developing viral persistence (11, 22, 41).
The importance and biological relevance of our study are strengthened by the fact that other groups have also recently observed a suppression of virus-specific CD8+ T-cell proliferation by regulatory T cells during persistent hepatitis C virus infection (5, 32a). Furthermore, Cabrera et al. detected a higher proportion of CD4+CD25+ T cells in chronic HCV infection and that these cells secrete IL-10 and TGF-ß. Interestingly, in this study the Treg-mediated suppression of HCV-specific IFN-
production by PBMCs could be recovered by the addition of anti-TGF-ß (5). In contrast, Rushbrook et al. and we did not observe that the Treg-mediated inhibition of proliferation was abolished by the addition of anti-TGF-ß suggesting that different effector functions of virus-specific CD8+ T cells might be controlled by different mechanisms. Finally, Rushbrook et al. also observed that regulatory T cells did not only suppress HCV-specific, but also Epstein-Barr virus- and cytomegalovirus-specific CD8+ T-cell responses in chronically HCV-infected patients also indicating that the Treg-mediated suppressive activity is not limited to virus-specific CD8+ T cells targeting the persisting virus (32a).
In summary, our results suggest that the presence of immunosuppressive CD4+ Treg cells accounts at least in part for impaired proliferation of virus-specific CD8+ T cells during chronic HCV infection. The Treg-mediated suppression is dose dependent, requires direct cell-cell contact, is independent of IL-10 and TGF-ß, and is not restricted to virus-specific CD8+ T cells targeting the persisting virus but also involves other virus-specific CD8+ T cells. These findings may have important implications for the development of new immunotherapeutic strategies against chronic HCV infection via stimulation of HCV-specific immunity through inhibition or depletion of Treg cells.
This study was supported by grants TH 719/2-1 and 2-2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Emmy Noether Programm), Bonn, Germany, and SFB 620 C6 to R. Thimme.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»