Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2005, p. 245-256, Vol. 79, No. 1
0022-538X/05/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.1.245-256.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and
S. Diane Hayward1,2*
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center,1 Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland2
Received 8 June 2004/ Accepted 12 August 2004
|
|
|---|
ZBRK1) plasmid was examined in lytically induced D98-HR1 cells. Exogenous ZBRK1, KAP-1, or BRCA1 increased the efficiency of oriLyt replication, while deletion of the ZBRK1 binding site impaired replication. These experiments identify ZBRK1 as another cell protein that, through BBLF2/3, provides a tethering point on oriLyt for the EBV replication complex. The data also suggest that BBLF2/3 may serve as a contact interface for cell proteins involved in replication of EBV oriLyt. |
|
|---|
The bZIP family Zta transactivator not only regulates EBV lytic gene expression but also serves an essential role in the replication of oriLyt. In transient replication assays in cells transfected with expression plasmids for the six core replication proteins, Zta is essential for replication, whereas the Rta and Mta lytic regulatory proteins influence replication efficiency but are nonessential (18, 66, 72). The BHLF1 promoter contains four Zta binding sites, and deletion of the two promoter-proximal sites severely impairs replication of an oriLyt plasmid. Substitution of the oriLyt Zta binding sites and provision of other transcription factors such as VP16 or human papillomavirus E2 did not restore replication, indicating that Zta provides replication activities beyond those of a transcriptional activator (69). Reinforcing this point was the demonstration that N-terminal regions of the Zta transactivation domain that did not affect transcriptional activation of Zta target genes were essential for oriLyt replication (14, 66).
Zta makes a number of different contributions to oriLyt replication. Zta induces G1/S and G2/M cell cycle arrest, which presumably creates an environment that favors replication of the EBV genomes at the expense of cellular DNA replication (19, 51). Cell cycle arrest has been linked to upregulation of the kinase inhibitors p21 and p27 and downregulation of c-Myc (8, 62), and effects on p53 levels may also contribute (53). CAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBP
) is a key player in this process, and Zta is unable to induce cell cycle arrest in C/EBP
null cells. Zta binds to C/EBP
to cooperatively activate C/EBP
-responsive genes, upregulates expression of C/EBP
and p21 at the transcriptional level, and stabilizes C/EBP
protein (81). Although cells are arrested in the cell cycle, selective changes occur that are normally associated with cell cycle progression. For example, retinoblastoma protein is hyperphosphorylated, an event that is mediated by the cyclin A/E-CDK2 complex (38), and the CDK2 inhibitors purvalanol A and roscovitine block EBV lytic replication (37).
A gene array analysis performed on telomerase-immortalized human keratinocytes infected with an adenovirus vector expressing the EBV BZLF1 protein identified a number of genes involved in cell cycle progression as being upregulated by Zta. These included E2F-1, cyclin E, and Cdc25A (52). Disruption of the structure of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) oncogenic domains is a common feature of the lytic stage of herpesvirus replication (2, 16, 35, 50), and PML oncogenic domains are dispersed, although incompletely, in cells induced for the EBV lytic cycle (1, 5). Overexpression of Zta results in PML oncogenic domain disruption, but other viral proteins may contribute at physiological levels of Zta (5). Zta is sumoylated on amino acid 12, and competition for sumoylation of PML may be a factor in dispersion of PML from the PML oncogenic domain structures (1, 15, 40, 56).
Another way in which Zta supports oriLyt replication is by interacting with components of the core replication complex. The six core EBV replication genes are the polymerase BALF5, the polymerase processivity factor BMRF1, the single-stranded DNA binding protein BALF2, the helicase BBLF4, the primase BSLF1, and the primase-associated factor BBLF2/3. In cotransfection replication assays, these six proteins plus Zta are sufficient to replicate oriLyt (18). The functions of the core replication proteins are sufficiently well conserved between the different herpesviruses that the six core proteins of herpes simplex virus (HSV) or of Kaposis sarcoma-associated herpesvirus can replicate EBV oriLyt in the presence of Zta (18, 80), and those of EBV can replicate cytomegalovirus oriLyt in the presence of cytomegalovirus UL84 (67). Zta has been shown to interact with BMRF1 through the bZIP domain of Zta (4, 86), with the BSLF1-BBLF2/3 primase subcomplex through amino acids 11 to 25 of the Zta activation domain (22, 66), and with BBLF4 through amino acids 24 to 86 of the Zta activation domain (41). These interactions presumably serve to stabilize the formation of an active replication complex on oriLyt, and in this capacity Zta is acting as an origin binding protein. However, there are numerous Zta binding sites throughout the EBV genome, and therefore other mechanisms must exist to preferentially elicit replication complex formation at oriLyt.
One way in which to generate specificity is through combinatorial interactions utilizing contacts between other oriLyt binding proteins and the replication complex. The transcription factors SP1 and ZBP-89 bind to the essential replication-specific domain of oriLyt, and these proteins interact with the polymerase processivity factor BMRF1 and the DNA polymerase BALF5 (4, 85), thus providing a cell protein tether to the replication complex. We now describe another set of contacts between oriLyt and the replication complex, in this case mediated by interactions between the zinc finger protein ZBRK1 and the its corepressor KAP-1 with the primase-associated factor BBLF2/3.
|
|
|---|
Plasmids. BBLF2/3 cDNA was obtained from 293T cells transfected with a BBLF2/3 genomic expression plasmid (pRTS25) with reverse transcription-PCR and the primers 5'-GTCAGGATCCATGATGGAAACACCCGCGGA and 5'-GACTGGATCCGAATAAACTGAGAACAGTC. Gal4DBD-BBLF2/3 (pGL77) was constructed by ligating the BBLF2/3 cDNA into the BamHI site of the yeast expression vector pAS1-CYH2. The ZBRK1 and KAP-1 cDNAs (MGC ID 3270 and 3849) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. The ZBRK1 and KAP-1 sequences were amplified by PCR techniques and the primers 5'-GACTAGATCTATGATCCAGGCCCAGGAATC and 5'-GACTAGATCTCTATGGGTTTTCTGTAACAT (ZBRK1) and 5'-GACTAGATCTATGGCGGCCTCCGCGGCGGCA and 5'-GACTAGATCTTCAGGGGCCATCACCAGGGC (KAP-1).
For eukaryotic expression, ZBRK1 and KAP-1 were cloned into SG5 [ZBRK1 (pGL115) and KAP-1 (pGL118A)] or the SG5-based vectors pJH253 [Flag-ZBRK1 (pGL116) and Flag-KAP-1 (pGL119A)], and HYC66 [HA-KAP-1 (pGL190)]. The glutathione S-transferase-ZBRK1zn fusion plasmid (pGL136) was constructed by PCR amplification of ZBRK1 codons 169 to 439 with the primers 5'-AGTCAGATCTGAACGACTTCATACTGCAA and 5'-AGTCAGATCTGCAGGAGGATTTTCCAC and ligation into the BglII site of pGH413. The OriLyt BamHI/PstI fragment derived from pSL77 was cloned into the pBluescript II SK(+) vector (Stratagene) to create pBluescript-Orilyt (pGL208). pBluescript-Orilyt
ZBRK1 (pGL215) was constructed by a three-way ligation. The ZBRK1 site on oriLyt of pGL208 was replaced by a HindIII site. PCR was used to amplify an AflII/HindIII fragment with the primers 5'-GTACCTTAAGGTGCGCCACCCTTCCTCCTT and 5'-AGTCAAGCTTAAAGGCAGCCACCACGCTGG, and a HindIII/BglII fragment with the primers 5'-AGTCAAGCTTCCACTAAGCCCCCGTTGCTC and 5'-TGCAAGATCTGGCACAAATGTAATTAAGAG. These fragments were ligated to form an AflII-HindIII-BglII fragment to replace the wild-type AflII-BglII fragment in pGL208.
The oriLyt-wtZBRK1-luciferase plasmid (pGL108) contained the equivalent wild-type oriLyt fragment amplified by PCR with pDH124 (43) as the template and the primers 5'-GACTGGATCCGGCTCGCCTTCTTTTATCCTC and 5'-AGTCACGCGTGGGTTAGTGATGAAACAGGC and ligated into the BglII and MluI sites of pGL2 (CloneTech). The oriLyt-
ZBRK1-luciferase plasmid (pGL133) was constructed by three-way ligation. A BamHI/HindIII fragment PCR amplified with the primers 5'-GACTGGATCCGGCTCGCCTTCTTTTATCCTC and 5-AGTCAAGCTTAAAGGCAGCCACCACGCTGG and a HindIII/MluI fragment amplified the primers with 5'-AGTCAAGCTTCCACTAAGCCCCCGTTGCTC and 5'-AGTCACGCGTGGGTTAGTGATGAAACAGGC were ligated to form a BamHI-HindIII-MluI fragment and then inserted into the BglII and MluI sites of pGL2 (CloneTech). The Flag-BRCA1 plasmid was a gift from David B. Young (Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Australia) The expression plasmids for BBLF2/3 (pRTS25), Zta (pRTS21), Rta (pRTS15), and Myc-BBLF2/3 (pDH318) have been described elsewhere (22).
Yeast two-hybrid screen.
The yeast two-hybrid screen was performed with Saccharomyces cerevisiae AH109 transformed with pAS1-CYH2-BBLF2/3 (pGL77) and a commercial EBV-infected B-cell Gal4ACT library (Clontech). Transformants (5 x 106) were plated and screened on 150-mm-diameter plates with medium containing 20 µg of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-
-Gal) and lacking adenine, histidine, leucine, and tryptophan. Blue colonies were picked and transferred to SD medium lacking Ade, His, Leu, Trp, and X-
-Gal to verify the phenotype. A filter assay with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) was performed to check for ß-galactosidase production by the putative positive clones. The library plasmid was rescued via transformation of Escherichia coli, and the inserts were sequenced.
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. 293T or HeLa cells seeded at 106 per 10-cm-diameter culture dish were transfected with 20 µg of expression plasmid by the calcium phosphate method. Two days after transfection, the cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4; 0.144 g of KH2PO4, 9.0 g of NaCl, and 0.795 g of Na2HPO4 · 7 H2O per liter) and lysed in 2.5 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg of pepstatin per ml and 5 µg of aprotinin per ml) at 4°C and homogenized. Lysates were precleared with Sepharose beads, and the supernatant was mixed with rabbit anti-Flag, mouse anti-Myc or anti-hemagglutinin (HA) monoclonal antibody (Sigma), or rabbit anti-Rta antibodies (gift from J. M. Hardwick) at 4°C overnight and protein A- and G-Sepharose beads for 2 h at 4°C. The beads were washed six times with cold lysis buffer and resuspended in 30 µl of 2x sodium dodecyl sulfate protein sample loading buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 10% glycerol, 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.05% bromophenol). The sample (15 µl) was subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 10% polyacrylamide gel. The gel was transferred to a membrane that was probed with antibody against Myc, Flag, or HA (Sigma, St Louis, Mo.), and the bands were visualized by chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Wild-type and mutant ZBRK1 oligonucleotide probes were synthesized as described (87). The OriLyt ZBRK1 probe was formed by annealing the complementary oligonucleotides 5'-GATCGCCTTTGGGTAGCATCACTTTGAGCC and 5'-GATCGGCTCAAAGTGATGCATCCCAAAGGC. The probes were labeled with Klenow enzyme and [32P]dCTP. In each reaction, 50,000 cpm of 32P-labeled probe was mixed with GST-ZBRK1Zn fusion protein purified by elution from glutathione-agarose beads with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 5 mM reduced glutathione. Poly(dI/dC) (100 ng) was added to each reaction. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature, the mixture was loaded onto a 5% polyacrylamide gel in running buffer containing 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and 0.1 mM EDTA. The dried gel was subjected to autoradiography.
Immunofluorescence assays. Vero, D98-HR1, or AGS-BX1cells were seeded at 8 x 104 cells per well in two-well slide chambers. Cells were transfected with a maximum of 3 µg of DNA by the calcium phosphate procedure. After transfection, cells were incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus 10% fetal bovine serum for 16 h at 35°C in 3% CO2, followed by a medium change and a further 24 h of incubation. Cells were washed in PBS, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature, and permeabilized for 20 min on ice in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells were incubated with primary antibody for 60 min at 37°C and with secondary antibody at 37°C for 30 min. Between each staining step, the cells were washed in PBS three times for 5 min each time. The antibodies used were anti-BMRF1 monoclonal antibody (1:200; ABI Advanced Biotechnologies, Inc., Columbia, Md.), rabbit anti-Rta antibodies, rabbit anti-Myc antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.), and mouse anti-Myc monoclonal and rabbit anti-Flag antibodies (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (1:200), rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (1:200) and indodicarbocyanine-conjugated donkey anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Jackson Laboratories, West Grove, Pa.).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. EBV-positive D98-HR1 cells seeded at 106 per 10-cm-diameter culture dish were cotransfected with 10 µg of Zta (pRTS21) plus 10 µg of Flag-ZBRK1 (pGL116), Flag-KAP-1 (pGL119A), or Flag-BRCA1 plasmid by the calcium phosphate method. Two days after transfection, the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was performed with a commercial protocol (Upstate, Lake Placid, N.Y.). For immunoprecipitation, 1 µg of anti-BMRF1 monoclonal antibody (ABI Advanced Biotechnologies, Inc., Columbia, Md.), rabbit anti-Flag antibodies, or mouse anti-Myc monoclonal antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) was mixed with 2.5 ml of sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis extract-chromatin immunoprecipitation dilution buffer overnight at 4°C with rotation, followed by addition of 60 µl of salmon sperm DNA-protein A-agarose slurry and incubation for 1 h at 4°C with rotation to collect the antibody complex. After five washes with the buffer provided by the kit, the protein A-antibody-histone-DNA complex was eluted in 0.5 ml of 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.1 M NaHCO3; 20 µl of 5 M NaCl was added to the combined eluates (0.5 ml), which were heated at 65°C overnight to reverse the protein-DNA cross-links. After treatment with 4 µg of proteinase K per ml in 10 mM EDTA, 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.5), and 200 mM NaCl for 1 h at 45°C, the DNA was recovered by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, and resuspended in 10 mM TE buffer (pH 8.0).
EBV oriLyt primers LGH 5036 (5'-CAGGTGTGTCATTTTAGCCC-3') and LGH5040 (5'-TCCTGGTTCAACCCTATGGAG-3'), specific for a 185-bp region in the oriLyt enhancer, were used for PCR amplification. Two primers, LGH5038 (5'-CTGACTTGTCACCTTTGCAC-3') and LGH5041 (5'-GCTTAGTGTGTCATGGTGAG-3'), specific for a 165-bp region in the oriLyt promoter that is 522 bp away from the ZBRK1 site were used for comparison. The PCR products were analyzed on a 1.5% agarose gel and quantitated in the MultiImage Light Cabinet (Alpha-Innotech Corp.) with the accompanying FluorChem (version 1.02) software.
Transient replication assays.
For D98-HR-1 assays, 2 µg of oriLyt plasmid DNA (pGL208) was electroporated into D98-HR1 cells with or without 5 µg of Zta and 5 µg of Rta plasmid DNA in 0.5 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum with a Bio-Rad Gene Pulser II with a 0.4-cm cuvette and set at capacitance 950 µF and 180 V. Two days after cotransfection, the DNA was prepared with the Wizard SV genomic DNA purification system (Promega). The DNA was cleaved with EcoRI and DpnI or EcoRI and MboI to distinguish between replicated plasmid DNA and input DNA that had not replicated in eukaryotic cells. After the digestion had gone to completion, the DNA was purified and concentrated by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation in 20 µl of TE (pH 8.0). A 1-kb ApaLI fragment from the oriLyt plasmid vector (pBluescript II SK[+]) was used as the probe for Southern blot hybridization and autoradiography. Cotransfection-replication assays were performed as described (18). OriLyt (pEF52) contains EBV sequences from BamHI-H (48,852) to BclI (53,770). OriLyt (cytomegalovirus enhancer) has the SmaI fragment of pEF52 replaced with the 860-bp cytomegalovirus immediate-early enhancer. OriLyt (
KpnI-BclI) is deleted for the essential replication domain and for the oriLyt enhancer.
Luciferase assays. HeLa cells were plated in six-well plates (Nunc) at 105 cells per well 1 day prior to transfection. Transfections were performed essentially as described previously (36) with 1 µg of each plasmid DNA. Vector DNA was used to keep the total amount of transfected DNA constant. The experiment was performed in triplicate.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. BBLF2/3-interacting proteins
|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Interactions between BBLF2/3, ZBRK1, and KAP-1. Western blots of epitope-tagged proteins immunoprecipitated (IP) with the indicated antibodies from cells cotransfected with (A) Myc-BBLF2/3 and Flag-ZBRK1, (B) Flag-KAP-1 and Myc-BBLF2/3, and (C) HA-KAP-1 and Flag-ZBRK1. (A) Myc-BBLF2/3 interacts with Flag-ZBRK1. Lane 1, direct precipitation of Myc-BBLF2/3; lane 2, cell extract; lane 3, coprecipitation of BBLF2/3 with Flag-ZBRK1; lane 4, precipitation with control immunoglobulin G. (B) Flag-KAP-1 interacts with Myc-BBLF2/3. Lane 1, direct precipitation of Flag-KAP-1; lane 2, coprecipitation of Flag-KAP-1 with Myc-BBLF2/3; lane 3, precipitation with control immunoglobulin G; lane 4, cell extract. (C) HA-KAP-1 interacts with Flag-ZBRK1. Lane 1, direct precipitation of HA-KAP-1; lane 2, cell extract; lane 3, precipitation with control immunoglobulin G; lane 4, coprecipitation of HA-KAP-1 with Flag-ZBRK1. The amount of extract used in the direct precipitations was 1/20th of that used in the coprecipitations.
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. ZBRK1 binds to the oriLyt enhancer. (A) Diagram of the region of EBV BamHI-H containing oriLyt. The locations of the oriLyt (BHLF1) promoter and enhancer (69), the AT-rich region (65), and the binding sites for Zta (ZRE1 to ZRE7) (68), Rta (RRE1 and RRE2) (27), and SP1 and ZBP-89 (4, 26, 85) are indicated relative to a potential ZBRK1 binding site (ZBRK1). (B) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay in which GST-ZBRK1zn or control GST protein was incubated with 32P-labeled probes containing the potential ZBRK1 site in A (lanes 1 to 5), a consensus ZBRK1 site (lanes 6 to 10), or a mutated ZBRK1 site (lanes 11 to 15). Unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides were added at 100-fold excess. (C) Cotransfection-replication assay showing the reduction in replication efficiency that occurs with substitution of the oriLyt enhancer region by the cytomegalovirus immediate-early enhancer. Southern blot of transfected Vero cell DNA digested with BamHI plus DpnI and probed with vector DNA to detect replicated oriLyt. Lane 1, oriLyt (cytomegalovirus enhancer). Lane 2, oriLyt( KpnI-BclI). Lane 3, oriLyt(pEF52).
|
KpnI-BclI) is deleted for the essential relation-specific domain and is replication incompetent (Fig. 2C, lane 2). Thus, the ZBRK1 binding site would not be expected to be essential for replication but could contribute to replication efficiency. BBLF2/3 also interacts with Rta. In transient replication assays in transfected cells, Rta is not essential for replication of an oriLyt containing plasmid but replication by Zta mutated at codons 12 and 13 can be partially rescued by Rta, suggesting that Rta may provide an ancillary replication function (66). The ZBRK1 binding site in oriLyt lies adjacent to two binding sites for the EBV Rta transactivator. The close proximity of these sites, along with the fact that the Zta 12/13 mutation impairs the interaction of Zta with the BBLF2/3-BSLF1 primase subcomplex (22), raised the possibility that BBLF2/3 might make contacts with Rta. Interaction between BBLF2/3 and Rta was detected experimentally with two approaches. Western blot analysis of extracts from 293T cells cotransfected with Myc-BBLF2/3 and Rta showed that Myc-BBLF2/3 was directly precipitated by anti-Myc antibody (Fig. 3A, lane 1) and was also present in the Rta precipitate (lane 3). Myc-BBLF2/3 was not precipitated by control heterologous antibody (lane 4).
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. BBLF2/3 interacts with Rta. (A) Western blot analysis of Myc-BBLF2/3 proteins immunoprecipitated from extracts of 293T cells transfected with expression vectors for Myc-BBLF2/3 and Rta. Lane 1, direct precipitation of Myc-BBLF2/3; lane 2, cell extract; lane 3, coprecipitation of Myc-BBLF2/3 with anti-Rta antibody; lane 4, precipitation with heterologous antibody. The amount of extract used in the direct precipitates was 1/20th of that used in the coprecipitates. (B) Indirect immunofluorescence assay showing the intracellular localization of Myc-BBLF2/3 when transfected into Vero cells alone (a and b) or in the presence of cotransfected Rta (d). Myc-BBLF2/3 was detected with anti-Myc antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody. Rta (c) was detected with anti-Rta polyclonal antiserum and rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody. Nuclear staining for Myc-BBLF2/3 is increased in the presence of Rta (panel d versus panels a and b).
|
BBLF2/3-interacting proteins are present in replication compartments in induced D98-HR1 cells. BBLF2/3 functions in EBV DNA replication, and the interaction of BBLF2/3 with ZBRK1 and KAP-1 is of interest primarily in the context of the potential contribution of these proteins to oriLyt replication. To determine whether the intracellular localization of ZBRK1 and KAP-1 was compatible with a replication-associated activity, the localization of epitope-tagged ZBRK1 and KAP-1 was examined in D98-HR1 and AGS-BX1 cells that were induced for lytic cycle replication by transfection with Zta. Immunofluorescence assays were performed on the transfected cells, and staining with anti-BMRF1 antibody was used to detect endogenous BMRF1, which served as a marker for viral replication compartments (Fig. 4). In these assays, Myc-BBLF2/3 showed the expected colocalization with BMRF1 in replication compartments (Fig. 4a and b). Transfected Flag-ZBRK1 (Fig. 4c and d) and transfected Flag-KAP-1(Fig. 4e and f) were also detected in BMRF1 staining replication compartments.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. BBLF2/3, ZBRK1, KAP-1, and BRCA1 are present in viral replication compartments. Immunofluorescence assays performed on D98-HR1 or AGS-Bx1 (c and d) cells transfected with Zta to induce the EBV lytic cycle plus epitope-tagged BBLF2/3 (a and b), ZBRK1 (c and d), KAP-1(e and f) or BRCA1 (g and h). Cells were stained for BMRF1 as a marker for viral replication compartments with anti-BMRF1 antibody and indodicarbocyanine-conjugated secondary antibody. Epitope-tagged proteins were detected with anti-Flag or anti-Myc antibodies and rhodamine-conjugated secondary antibody.
|
ZBRK1, KAP-1, and BRCA1 are associated with oriLyt DNA. To assess whether ZBRK1 and the ZBRK1 binding proteins KAP-1 and BRCA1 were associated with oriLyt in EBV-infected cells, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed (Fig. 5). D98-HR1 cells were electroporated with Zta to induce EBV lytic replication plus either Flag-ZBRK1 (Fig. 5A), Flag-KAP-1 (Fig. 5B), or Flag-BRCA1 (Fig. 5C). Extracts of the electroporated cells were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies, and the presence of associated oriLyt DNA was assessed with PCR primers that amplified a 185-bp region (53454 to 53642) from the oriLyt enhancer or a 165-bp fragment (52886 to 53051) from the oriLyt promoter region. Immunoprecipitation of endogenously expressed BMRF1 served as a positive control (Fig. 5A, 5B, and 5C) and immunoprecipitation with anti-Myc antibody served as a negative control (Fig. 5A, 5B, and 5C).
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. ZBRK1, KAP-1, and BRCA1 are associated with oriLyt DNA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays performed on extracts of D98-HR1 cells induced for the lytic cycle by electroporation of Zta and also receiving (A) Flag-tagged ZBRK1, (B) Flag-KAP-1, or (C) Flag-BRCA1. Anti-BMRF1 antibody was used to precipitate endogenous BMRF1 (lane 1), and anti-Flag antibody was used to precipitate the Flag-tagged ZBRK1, KAP-1, and BRCA1 proteins (lane2). Precipitates generated with anti-Myc antibody served as negative controls (lane 3). Input DNA in the cell lysate (lane 4) and DNA associated with the immunoprecipitates was amplified by PCR with primers that generated a 185-bp fragment of the oriLyt enhancer or primers that generated a 165-bp fragment of the oriLyt promoter. The PCR products were displayed on an agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Lane 5, DNA size markers.
|
ZBRK1 contributes to oriLyt replication efficiency. To evaluate whether ZBRK1 had any effect on oriLyt replication, the replication of an oriLyt plasmid was examined in D98-HR1 cells electroporated with ZBRK1 or the ZBRK1-interacting protein KAP-1 or BRCA1 plus Zta and Rta to induce the EBV lytic cycle. In this assay, replicated DNA was identified by exploiting the ability of the restriction enzyme DpnI to discriminate between input oriLyt DNA that carries the bacterially imposed methylation pattern and oriLyt DNA that has been replicated in the cell and no longer carries the bacterial methylation markers. Input DNA is cleaved, and DpnI-resistant DNA represents the replicated DNA. Aliquots of total cell DNA were subjected to digestion with EcoRI and DpnI. This results in linearization of the replicated 8.8-kb oriLyt plasmid. The DNA was then subjected to Southern blotting with a 1-kb ApaLI fragment of the pBluescript II SK plasmid vector as the probe. The use of a vector probe allowed analysis of the replication of the input oriLyt plasmid without the readout being complicated by replication of the endogenous EBV genomes. Aliquots from the same samples were also digested with EcoRI plus MboI. MboI has the same four-base recognition sequence as DpnI but in contrast to DpnI does not cleave the input methylated DNA. Thus, an identical 8.8-kb linear oriLyt plasmid is generated by this cleavage. The EcoRI/MboI fragment provides a measure of the amount of input oriLyt plasmid present in the cell extracts and serves to ensure that the different samples were transfected and extracted with equal efficiency.
Addition of ZBRK1 increased the efficiency of oriLyt replication, as shown in two independent replication assays (Fig. 6, lane 2 versus lane 1 and lane 7 versus lane 6). Addition of KAP-1 also increased oriLyt replication, although the increase was less than that seen with ZBRK1 (Fig. 6, lane 3 versus lane 1 and lane 8 versus lane 6). Exogenous BRCA1 also had a positive effect on oriLyt replication efficiency (Fig. 6, lane 9 versus lane 6). In the absence of lytic cycle induction by Zta and Rta, input oriLyt plasmid was detected by Mbo/EcoRI cleavage but no DpnI-resistant replicated DNA was observed (Fig. 6, lane 4 and lane 10).
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. ZBRK1, KAP-1, and BRCA1 increase oriLyt replication efficiency. Southern blots of DNA extracted from two independent experiments (lanes 1 to 5 and lanes 6 to 11) in which D98-HR1 cells were electroporated with Zta and Rta to induce lytic replication gene expression plus ZBRK1, KAP-1, or BRCA1. Replicated oriLyt plasmid DNA was identified by digestion with DpnI and EcoRI (upper panels) and input DNA was identified by digestion with MboI and EcoRI (lower panels). DNA was visualized with 32P-labeled oriLyt vector DNA as a probe. Cells were electroporated with: lane 1, oriLyt, Zta, and Rta; lane 2, oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and ZBRK1; lane 3, oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and KAP-1; and lane 4, oriLyt and SG5 vector DNA. Lane 5 contains oriLyt plasmid DNA. Cells were electroporated with the following: lane 6, oriLyt, Zta, and Rta; lane 7, oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and ZBRK1; lane 8, oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and KAP-1; lane 9, oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and BRCA1; lane 10, oriLyt and SG5 vector DNA. Lane 11 contains oriLyt plasmid DNA.
|
ZBRK1) replicated less efficiently than wild-type OriLyt in the absence of added exogenous ZBRK1 (Fig. 7A, lane 3 versus lane 1 and lane 9 versus lane 6) and in the presence of added exogenous ZBRK1 (Fig. 7A, lane 4 versus lane 2 and lane 10 versus lane 7). The oriLyt-(
ZBRK1) plasmid still showed some increase in replication efficiency in the presence of added ZBRK1 (Fig. 7A, lane 4 versus lane 3 and lane 10 versus lane 9), suggesting that ZBRK1 also had some effect on replication beyond that mediated by the oriLyt ZBRK1 binding site. In contrast, the mild increase in replication efficiency seen with the addition of KAP-1 (Fig. 7A, lane 8 versus lane 6) was not observed with OriLyt-(
ZBRK1) (Fig. 7A, lane 11 versus lane 9), implying that interaction of KAP-1 with ZBRK1 at the oriLyt ZBRK1 site was the dominant source of the KAP-1 stimulation. The increase observed in the replication of oriLyt with the addition of ZBRK1 and the decreased replication efficiency of oriLyt(
ZBRK1) were replication-specific changes. Examination of the expression of luciferase driven by the BHLF1 promoter in an oriLyt-luciferase plasmid revealed that the low basal activity of the BHLF1 promoter was not significantly affected by the addition of ZBRK1 or by the deletion of the ZBRK1 site from the oriLyt enhancer region (Fig. 7B).
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Deletion of the oriLyt ZBRK1 binding site impairs oriLyt replication but not transcriptional activity. (A) Southern blots showing two independent replication assays (lanes 1 to 5 and lanes 6 to 12) comparing the replication efficiency of the Wt-OriLyt plasmid and OriLyt- ZBRK1. The assays were performed as described for Fig. 6. Cells were electroporated with (lanes 1 and 3) oriLyt, Zta, and Rta and (lanes 2 and 4) oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and ZBRK1. Lane 5 contains oriLyt plasmid DNA. Cells were electroporated with the following: lanes 6 and 9, oriLyt, Zta, and Rta; lanes 7 and 10, oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and ZBRK1; lanes 8 and 11, oriLyt, Zta, Rta, and KAP-1. Lane 12 contains oriLyt plasmid DNA. (B) Luciferase reporter assay performed in HeLa cells transfected with OriLyt-luciferase or OriLyt ( ZBRK1)-luciferase reporters (1.0 µg), together with ZBRK1 or vector (1.0 µg) as indicated. Results are the averages of three experiments, with the standard deviation shown.
|
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Summary of known interactions plus interactions identified in this work between the EBV core replication proteins and between these proteins, the Zta and Rta transactivators, and cellular proteins. The complexity of the protein-protein interactions and the multiple points of contact with oriLyt DNA are illustrated. Interactions identified only in S. cerevisiae are indicated by dotted lines.
|
The primase-associated factor is known to influence the intracellular localization of the helicase-primase complex, to stimulate primase activity (3, 73, 77), and, as described above, to be involved in interactions with other virally encoded replication proteins. In transfected cells, the prereplication foci established by the HSV single-stranded-DNA-binding protein and the helicase-primase proteins contain the cellular recombination and repair proteins RPA, RAD51, and NSB1,which are components of the homologous recombination pathway (79). The suggestion was therefore made that these four proteins are involved in the recruitment of cellular proteins that participate in the HSV DNA replication process. The results of our yeast two-hybrid screen suggest that the EBV primase-associated factor BBLF2/3 may form an interaction platform for a variety of cellular protein partners with replication-related functions.
The interactions observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with cellular DNA polymerase beta and two subunits of DNA polymerase delta plus a polymerase delta-interacting protein (47) are speculative, since they were not followed up experimentally. However, the interactions are likely to be relevant. DNA polymerase beta is a single-subunit DNA repair protein that functions in base excision repair (31), while DNA polymerase delta is a four-subunit holoenzyme that participates in both leading- and lagging-strand synthesis at the replication fork and interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (32). The TREX2 3'to 5' exonuclease associates with DNA polymerase delta and is important for the fidelity of polymerase delta (74, 75). The literature on the RNA helicase p68 focuses on a role in dissociation of double-stranded RNA structures and gene expression, but p68 is also capable of unwinding RNA-DNA hybrids (63). The EBV-encoded DNase BGLF5 has previously been shown to interact with the viral DNA polymerase BALF5, the polymerase processivity factor BMRF1, and the single-stranded-DNA-binding protein BALF2 (13, 45, 84) (Fig. 8).
The interactions between BBLF2/3 and ZBRK1 and KAP-1 were validated in coimmunoprecipitation assays, and both cell proteins were detected in EBV replication compartments and associated with oriLyt in chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses. ZBRK1 is an eight-zinc finger DNA-binding protein that contains an N-terminal Kruppel-associated box (KRAB) domain. KRAB domains mediate repression through interaction with the corepressor KAP-1 (70, 71). ZBRK1 and KAP-1 themselves have binding partners of potential relevance to oriLyt replication. ZBRK1 has a C-terminal BRCA1 binding domain (87). BRCA1 was isolated as a susceptibility gene for familial breast cancer and functions in multiple ways to maintain the integrity of the genome (33, 78). The 3,418-amino-acid BRCA1 protein has a C-terminal motif called a BRCT domain that is present in many DNA repair proteins and an N-terminal ring domain (60). BRCA1 binds to the Rad50-Mre11-Nbs1 complex and can also be isolated in a complex with BRCA2 and Rad51 (55, 90).
BRCA1 stimulates DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination and may also have some effect on repair by nonhomologous end joining (55, 89). Homologous recombination is utilized during DNA replication to bypass stalled replication forks (24). We detected BRCA1 in EBV replication compartments present in lytically induced cells and also found BRCA1 to be associated with oriLyt by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay and to increase oriLyt replication efficiency. In addition to its association with a macromolecular histone deacetylase-containing complex (71), KAP-1 binds to heterochromatin protein 1 (39, 64). In Drosophila melanogaster, heterochromatin protein 1 was found to bind to the origin recognition complex (57).
The EBV core replication proteins are linked through a series of contacts with each other and with the viral origin binding protein Zta, which in turn binds to multiple sites within oriLyt. (Fig. 8). However, it seems that additional contacts between the replication complex and oriLyt are important, either to generate structural specificity or to stabilize the complex. Contacts between the BMRF1 and BALF5 proteins and the DNA binding transcription factors SP1 and ZBP-89 have been reported previously (4, 26, 85). We have now identified additional tethering interactions between BBLF2/3 and Rta and between BBLF2/3 and ZBRK1. The interaction with ZBRK1 increased oriLyt replication efficiency but did not appear to be obligatory for replication of an oriLyt plasmid. This is consistent with the location of the ZBRK1 site within the oriLyt enhancer, which is important for replication efficiency but whose sequences are partially substitutable. BBLF2/3 and its HSV homolog UL8 have a recognized role in stimulating helicase-primase activity and in providing contacts with other virally encoded components of the replication complex. The interaction data provided here suggest an expanded contribution of BBLF2/3 to lytic EBV DNA replication through origin tethering and through recruitment of cellular replication-related proteins.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant R01 CA30356.
Present address: Meakins-Christie Laboratories, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»