Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 2004, p. 4943-4946, Vol. 78, No. 9
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.9.4943-4946.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
(Rorc) Is a Common Integration Site in Type B Leukemogenic Virus-Induced T-Cell Lymphomas
Section of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Austin, Texas 78712
Received 24 October 2003/ Accepted 15 December 2003
|
|
|---|
locus as an integration site in 19% of TBLV-induced tumors. Overexpression of one or more Ror
isoforms in >77% of the tumors tested may complement apoptotic effects of c-myc overexpression. |
|
|---|
Retroviruses that lack encoded oncogenes appear to induce cancer by insertional mutagenesis, leading to deregulation of nearby genes. Because retroviral integration is relatively random, identification of viral insertions within or near the same genes in different tumors suggests that there has been selection for outgrowth of cells carrying specific insertions. Such common integration sites (CISs) have been used as molecular tags to identify oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, and oncogenic pathways (5, 12, 17, 19, 25, 31). There are at least nine MMTV CISs, which generally fall into three categories (Wnt, Fgf, and Notch family genes [4, 16, 20, 21, 33]), whereas only two CISs, Tblvi1 and c-myc, have been described for TBLV. The Tblvi1 CIS was identified in 20% of 55 TBLV-induced T-cell lymphomas examined (26) and mapped to the mouse X chromosome, but the target gene(s) remains unknown. We have detected integrations within or near the c-myc locus in 23% of TBLV-induced tumors (references 3 and 28 and data not shown). However, unlike many other murine retroviral studies, our previous analysis of 35 TBLV-induced tumors revealed only two tumors with detectable c-myc arrangement by Southern analysis, while PCR analysis confirmed that those two tumors plus nine others had TBLV integrations near or within this locus (3). Surprisingly, one tumor (T623B) had at least seven TBLV insertions at four sites within or near the c-myc locus. These studies suggested that TBLV-induced lymphomas are polyclonal and that many of the integrations could not be detected by Southern blotting due to the presence of multiple tumor cell clones.
is a common TBLV integration site.
|
|
|---|
(Rorc) locus, which encodes at least two protein isoforms. Ror
and its thymus-specific isoform, Ror
t, are members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily that includes ligand-regulated transcription factors and receptors for which a specific ligand has not been identified (29). Ror
also is known as RORC, RZR, thymus orphan receptor, and nuclear receptor 1F3 (22, 23, 27). Ror
and Ror
t are highly related proteins that use distinct promoters and differ only at their amino termini (11, 13, 34). Ror
-knockout mice, which lose expression of both RNA isoforms, lack lymph nodes and Peyer's patches, demonstrating a requirement for Ror
/
t in lymphoid organogenesis (10, 14, 30). These mice also show a 75% reduction of total T cells and greatly reduced expression of the antiapoptotic gene Bcl-XL (14, 30). Exogenous expression of either isoform in T-cell hybridomas inhibited interleukin-2 and Fas ligand expression and blocked T-cell receptor-induced cell proliferation and apoptosis (11, 18). Ror
-null mice also have an increased rate of apoptosis and proliferation, resulting in rapid T-cell lymphoma formation (32). A recent report of Ror
t-deficient mice has ascribed most of the gross anomalies to the thymus-specific form (9).
In this study we screened a panel of 47 TBLV-induced tumors by PCR analysis using 26 primer pairs consisting of a forward or reverse TBLV-LTR primer and a Ror
genomic primer (combinations of those given in Table 1) as previously described (3). We detected TBLV integrations within or near the Ror
locus for 9 of the 47 tumors tested (19%) (Fig. 1). Several of these tumors (T7, T9, T12, T623B, and T670) contained multiple TBLV integrations in the same tumor but in different locations. Insertions occurred near the beginning or end of the gene, consistent with an enhancer insertion mechanism. No integrations interrupting the coding regions were detected since the two integrations in exon 11, T670 and T7, are located in the 3' untranslated region (UTR). The most common clustering of integrations occurred within intron 2 of Ror
, with six TBLV insertions detected in five different tumors. TBLV integrations also were clustered near the 3' end of the Ror
locus, which may alter promoter activity (36) or transcript stability (insertions in the 3' UTR). None of the integrations localized to the Ror
locus by PCR could be detected by Southern analysis with either a 4.3-kb genomic probe spanning Ror
exons 1 and 2, intron 1, and part of intron 2 through Ror
t exon 1(t) or a 3.9-kb probe including the 3' UTR of Ror
/
t exon 11 and downstream region, suggesting that only a portion of the tumor population contained the TBLV integration. The majority of the TBLV-induced tumors appeared to be at least semiclonal as judged by Southern blotting with T-cell receptor ß and
probes (data not shown).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used to identify TBLV integrations within the Ror / t locus
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Location of TBLV insertions within the Ror locus in T-cell lymphomas as detected by PCR. Black arrows represent the location and orientation of TBLV proviruses. The tumors (designated T) containing the integrations are indicated closest to the arrow. Black bars represent Ror exons; 5' and 3' UTRs are indicated by hatched boxes.
|
locus. We attempted to overcome such limitations by using sufficient primer sets to completely scan the locus (Table 1). Nevertheless, 5 kb represents the approximate region screened on either end of the gene, whereas retroviral insertions have been shown to affect gene expression at distances over 200 kb (15). Furthermore, Ror
locus intronic sequences include many single nucleotide runs and Alu repeats, which may have further diminished PCR product detection.
The Ror
locus was recently identified as a Moloney murine leukemia virus (MuLV) CIS in studies identifying p27Kip1 collaborating oncogenes (12). Complementarity between these two genes was suggested by Winoto and Littman (35) and indicates the utility of using numerous genetic and viral models to examine oncogenic pathways since other large-scale retroviral tagging studies using MuLV failed to detect the Ror
locus as a CIS (19, 25). Furthermore, 8.5% of the TBLV-induced tumors showed integrations in both c-myc and Ror
(Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. TBLV tumors with integrations at multiple loci
|
/
t expression in developing thymocytes is tightly controlled and is necessary for T-cell maturation (10, 13). Two recent studies using retroviral tagging identified the locus Sox4, encoding a transcription factor involved in B- and T-cell development, as a CIS for Moloney MuLV (25, 31). Although Sox4 was the most frequently targeted CIS in the study by Suzuki et al. (31) (55 of 194 tumors), we were unable to detect any TBLV integrations near Sox4. As previously suggested (8), these studies indicate that the unique TBLV enhancer is likely to identify additional cellular genes that are not identified by MuLV insertional mutagenesis.
and Ror
t are overexpressed in TBLV-induced tumors.
|
|
|---|
, Ror
t, c-myc and Gapdh mRNA levels in the TBLV-induced lymphomas were analyzed and compared to those from normal thymus (Fig. 2). Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed using an ABI PRISM 7700 sequence detection system and SYBR Green Universal Master Mix according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems). (Primers are shown in Table 3.) Ror
levels varied from 0.2- to 38-fold that observed in normal thymus, and 7 of the 18 tumors tested (
39%) showed at least twofold overexpression (and significant differences at the 95% confidence level by Student t tests). In contrast to previous reports (11), we routinely detected little or no Ror
expression in the thymus, yet expression was abundant in the liver (33-fold higher than that of normal thymus). TBLV integrations were identified in two of the tumors showing Ror
overexpression (T12 and T14). Seven different integration sites were detected in T12, four upstream of Ror
exon 1 and one in intron 2 in the same transcriptional orientation, and one each within introns 1 and 10, both in the reverse orientation. Ror
t expression levels in the tumors tested ranged from 0.2- to 52-fold that detected in normal thymus. Nine of the 18 lymphomas tested (
50%) showed at least twofold Ror
t overexpression, which was significantly different from levels in normal thymus; together, more than 77% of the TBLV-induced tumors overexpressed one or more Ror
isoforms. We have not yet detected TBLV integrations near the Ror
locus in any of the tumors showing Ror
t overexpression. However, proviral insertions may occur at more distal locations than those that were examined in this study, or Ror
t may be indirectly activated.
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Both c-myc and Ror / t are overexpressed in the majority of TBLV-induced tumors. c-myc (black bars), Ror t (gray bars), and Ror (white bars) expression levels from real-time RT-PCR analysis are shown relative to that from normal thymus. The standard errors for gene expression levels greater than 20-fold that of normal thymus are as follows: T13, Ror , 38 ± 0.4; T623B, c-myc, 27 ± 0.1; T703, c-myc, 22 ± 0.1; T708, c-myc, 21 ± 0.4; T708, Ror t, 52 ± 0.2; T709, c-myc, 21 ± 0.3; C3H liver, Ror , 33 ± 0.02. Gene expression experiments were performed in triplicate three to five times depending on the availability of tumor RNA. Real-time RT-PCR primers were used at a final concentration of 0.1 to 0.2 µM and had been previously determined to have similar amplification efficiencies (slopes of <0.1).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Primers used for real-time RT-PCR analysis
|
loci. Of these two tumors, T9 showed ca. fourfold c-myc overexpression and did not show Ror
or Ror
t overexpression; T623B showed high levels of c-myc overexpression (27-fold) and seven detected integrations and modest (ca. twofold) Ror
overexpression (with four detected integrations). We have previously demonstrated that the proviral location and orientation relative to c-myc and the composition of the enhancer within the TBLV LTR all affect target gene expression (3).
The observations that many tumors overexpressed both c-myc and Ror
/
t and that
9% of tumors had detectable insertions in both genes suggest that these transcription factors are important individually in the progression toward disease and may collaborate during T-cell lymphomagenesis. The idea that the antiapoptotic factors Ror
and Ror
t (14, 30, 32) may antagonize the known proapoptotic effects of c-Myc (6) is being explored.
This work was supported by NIH grant P01 77760.
|
|
|---|
t in the development of lymph nodes and Peyer's patches. Immunol. Rev. 195:81-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
t is essential for T lymphocyte maturation. J. Immunol. 164:5668-5674.
t, a novel isoform of an orphan receptor, negatively regulates Fas ligand expression and IL-2 production in T cells. Immunity 9:797-806.[CrossRef][Medline]
) is essential for lymphoid organogenesis and controls apoptosis during thymopoiesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:10132-10137.
in transcriptional regulation, thymocyte survival, and lymphoid organogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 64:373-381.
(RORC) gene. Genomics 46:93-102.[CrossRef][Medline]
and characterization of its response element. Gene 181:199-206.[CrossRef][Medline]
in thymocyte survival and lymphoid organ development. Science 288:2369-2373.
. Cancer Res. 62:901-909.
t, a thymus-specific isoform of the orphan nuclear receptor ROR
/TOR, is up-regulated by signaling through the pre-T cell receptor and binds to the TEA promoter. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:4072-4080.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»