Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, April 2004, p. 4063-4073, Vol. 78, No. 8
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.8.4063-4073.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Laertes Manuelidis,
and Daniel DiMaio1*
Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
Received 24 September 2003/ Accepted 12 December 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
During carcinogenesis, normal cells overcome their inability to grow indefinitely. The inexorable loss of replicative potential as normal human cells are passaged serially in culture is known as replicative senescence, an irreversible, nonproliferative but viable cellular state characterized by growth factor-resistant growth arrest, specific morphological changes including cell enlargement and flattening, increased autofluorescence, and elevated senescence-associated ß-galactosidase (SAß-Gal) activity (8, 58). Escape from replicative senescence and immortalization of cultured human keratinocytes requires reactivation of telomerase and inactivation of the Rb and p53 pathways (15, 42, 54). Coexpression of high-risk HPV E6 and E7 genes can also induce immortalization of keratinocytes, but HPV-immortalized cells are not tumorigenic, implying that additional mutations are required for malignant progression.
Even though HPV gene expression is not sufficient for tumorigenesis, studies utilizing the papillomavirus E2 proteins demonstrate that continuous expression of the viral oncogenes is required for the proliferation of cervical carcinoma cell lines. The papillomavirus E2 proteins are viral regulatory proteins that bind to the HPV major early promoter and inhibit transcription of the E6 and E7 genes (55, 62). Infection of HeLa cervical carcinoma cells with an simian virus 40 (SV40)-based viral vector that expresses the bovine papillomavirus (BPV) E2 protein represses expression of the integrated HPV18 E6 and E7 genes (24, 37). BPV E2-mediated repression of E6 and E7 expression in several cervical carcinoma cell lines, as well as in HPV-immortalized human keratinocytes, rapidly activates the p53 and Rb pathways and inhibits telomerase activity (13, 18, 24, 26, 36, 37, 43, 47, 50). p53 induction is followed by transcriptional induction of downstream target genes, including p21 and mdm2. Induction of the growth-inhibitory, hypophosphorylated form of p105Rb results in transcriptional repression of several E2F-responsive genes such as cyclin A and cdc25A due to the assembly of inhibitory Rb/E2F complexes and their recruitment to promoters containing E2F sites (50, 69). Under these conditions, cellular DNA synthesis is suppressed and the cells rapidly and uniformly acquire a phenotype that is indistinguishable from that of cells that have undergone replicative senescence (26, 43, 67). In these experiments, the E2 protein exerts no effect on the Rb or p53 pathways, telomerase activity, or cell proliferation when both E6 and E7 are constitutively expressed in HeLa cells (11, 19, 24) although in some situations papillomavirus E2 proteins can elicit HPV-independent effects, including apoptosis (12-14, 20, 57, 65). HPV18 E6/E7 RNA interference can also induce HeLa cells to undergo senescence (32). These results indicate that proliferation of cervical cancer cell lines requires continuous expression of the E6 and E7 genes.
To explore the role of the individual HPV oncogenes in cervical cancer cells, we separately expressed the HPV16 E6 or E7 gene in HeLa cells, thereby generating HeLa/16E6 and HeLa/16E7 cells, respectively (11). E2 expression represses the endogenous HPV18 genes in the cells, but not the HPV16 genes, which are expressed from a promoter that does not respond to the E2 protein. In this way, we can, in effect, repress HPV E6 alone, by introducing the E2 protein into HeLa/16E7 cells, or HPV E7 alone by introducing the E2 protein into HeLa/16E6 cells. When the E7 gene is specifically repressed in HeLa/16E6 cells, the Rb pathway but not the p53 pathway was activated, and senescence occurred in ca. 95% of the cells. In contrast, when the E6 gene is specifically repressed in HeLa/16E7 cells, the p53 but not the Rb pathway was activated. In these cells, senescence occurred less efficiently (about two-thirds of the cells senesce), and many cells continue to proliferate. After about 1 week, ca. 50% of the proliferating cells undergo apoptosis, a nonviable state characterized by a number of features, including annexin V binding and TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling) positivity. Repression of either E6 or E7 resulted in a marked reduction of telomerase activity.
We are interested in determining the cellular signaling pathways responsible for the phenotypes caused by HPV repression in HeLa cells. In many situations, p53 is a key mediator of senescence and apoptosis. Indeed, overexpression of p53 can induce these phenotypes in a variety of cell types (see, for example, reference 61 and 70). However, when both E6 and E7 are repressed, p53 does not appear to be required for induced senescence. First, senescence is efficiently induced by E7 repression in HeLa/16E6 cells even though activation of the p53 pathway is prevented by constitutive expression of the HPV16 E6 gene (11). Second, the E2 protein repressed HPV30 E6/E7 expression and induced senescence in the absence of p21 induction in HT-3 cells, a cervical carcinoma cell line that contains HPV30 DNA and that harbors only transactivation-defective p53 (26, 50). Taken together, these results suggest that HPV E7 repression can activate a p53-independent pathway that results in senescence.
Telomere status and telomerase activity are also involved in senescence. Telomere shortening is an important trigger for replicative senescence in primary cells (2, 63), and keratinocyte immortalization requires activation of telomerase (15, 42). Although HeLa cells express telomerase and display stable telomere length, the average length of their telomeres is quite short (5, 23). To assess the role of telomeres in induced senescence, we introduced the catalytic protein subunit of hTERT into HeLa cells, resulting in greatly elevated telomerase activity and long telomeres (23). Despite these lengthened telomeres, the cells still efficiently and rapidly underwent senescence in response to E2-mediated repression of both HPV E6 and E7. Thus, once expression of the HPV E6/E7 genes is extinguished, senescence does not appear to be initiated by short telomeres.
Although p53 and telomerase are not required for senescence when both E6 and E7 are repressed, it is possible that redundant or overlapping cellular pathways are activated when both viral oncogenes are repressed. Therefore, roles for p53 and telomere length in senescence and apoptosis may be revealed when the E6 and the E7 genes are repressed individually. Accordingly, we sought to test the hypothesis that p53 signaling mediates senescence or apoptosis after repression of E6 alone in the HeLa/16E7 cells. Because cells that escape senescence after E6 repression continue to proliferate in the face of reduced telomerase activity, we also hypothesized that the resulting shortened telomeres may eventually fall below a certain threshold length and trigger the delayed onset of apoptosis in these cells. The experiments reported here demonstrate that p53 is in fact required for senescence and apoptosis after repression of E6 alone. In contrast, our experiments did not reveal a role of telomerase in these activities.
|
|
|---|
High-titer stocks of the SV40/BPV type 1 (BPV) recombinant virus expressing the BPV-1 E2 protein were prepared, the titers were determined, and the stocks were used to infect cells at a multiplicity of infection of 20, as described previously (50). Infected cells were maintained in the absence of drug selection with fresh medium every 3 days for the duration of the experiment.
Telomere length. Telomere length was measured as described previously (23). Briefly, genomic DNA was digested with RsaI and HinfI and resolved by electrophoresis in a 0.7% agarose gel. After transfer to a Nytran membrane, telomeres were detected by hybridization to a 32P-5'-end-labeled (TTAGGG)3 telomere-specific oligonucleotide.
Telomerase activity. Cells were seeded at 2 x 105 per 60 mm dish and the next day mock infected or infected with E2 virus. After 2 and 6 days, the cells were harvested and stored at -80°C. The samples were analyzed for telomerase activity by using a TRAPeze telomerase detection kit (Intergen, Purchase, N.Y.) according to the manufacturer's instructions for radioisotopic detection. The reaction products were resolved by nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and quantitated by using a Storm 840 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.). No activity was detectable if samples were heat inactivated prior to analysis.
Western and Northern blots. Cells were lysed with TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Bethesda, Md.) 2 days after mock infection or infection with the E2 virus, and total cellular RNA and protein extracts were prepared as described previously (25). For the analysis of p53CTF, 2 days after mock infection or infection with the E2 virus, cells were lysed in modified EBC buffer as described previously (11).
Portions (5 or 10 µg) of total protein were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and Western blot analyses were performed as described previously (11) with antibodies specific for the following proteins: wild-type p53 (Ab-6 from Oncogene Sciences, Boston, Mass., or 15801A from Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.), p53CTF (Ab-1 from Oncogene Sciences), p21 (SC-6246 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.), p105Rb (554136 from Pharmingen), and cyclin A (gift of H. Zhang, Yale University). After being washed, the membranes were incubated with species-specific horseradish peroxidase-conjugated donkey antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pa.). Membranes were incubated with ECL+ (Amersham, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), and the signals were detected by using Hyperfilm (Amersham).
For Northern blot analysis, 4 or 5 µg of total RNA was denatured, resolved by electrophoresis on a 1% formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred to a Nytran Supercharge membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, N.H.), and cross-linked to the membrane by UV irradiation with a Stratalinker (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The immobilized RNA was detected by hybridization to random prime-labeled probes made by using the Strip-EZ DNA kit (Ambion, Inc., Austin, Tex.), and the signal was detected with a PhosphorImager. Sequential hybridizations were performed after stripping the previous probe from the membrane.
DNA synthesis assay. Cellular DNA synthesis assays were performed in quadruplicate 2 days after mock infection or infection with the E2 virus. Cells were labeled for 4 h in medium containing 1.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine (ICN)/ml, and the incorporation of acid-insoluble thymidine into DNA was measured as described previously (24).
Autofluorescence and annexin V binding. A total of 2 x 105 or 5 x 105 cells were seeded into 100-mm-diameter dishes and the next day were mock infected or infected with the E2 virus, respectively. The assays were performed 6 days after infection, as described previously (11).
SAß-Gal assay. Cells (1 x 103 or 5 x 104) were seeded into six-well plates and the next day were mock-infected or infected with the E2 virus, respectively. Nine days later, the cells were stained at pH 6.0 with X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside) as described previously (17).
|
|
|---|
These cell lines were analyzed to confirm expression of dominant-negative p53. Protein extracts were prepared from the cells 2 days after mock infection or infection with the E2 virus, and expression of the truncated dominant-negative p53CTF was analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 1). p53CTF was expressed only in cells transduced with the retrovirus carrying the p53CTF gene. In the transduced cells, there was little expression of p53CTF in the absence of E2 expression, presumably because the endogenous HPV18 E6 gene destabilizes p53CTF in addition to full-length p53. Expression of the E2 protein induced the expression of p53CTF in these cell lines due to repression of the endogenous HPV18 E6 gene (see below) and the loss of the E6-mediated destabilization of p53. HeLa/16E7-p53CTF-7 cells express higher levels of p53CTF than do HeLa/16E7-p53CTF-4 cells.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Expression of dominant-negative p53 and its effect on HPV E6 and E7 gene expression. At 2 days after infection with the E2 virus (+) or mock infection (-), protein and RNA were harvested from HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/LXSN-p53CTF-3, and HeLa/16E7-3 cells, as well as from two HeLa/16E7-p53CTF cell lines, as indicated. In the top panel, 5 µg of protein of each sample was resolved by gel electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and probed with antibodies specific for p53CTF. In the bottom panel, 5 µg of RNA of each sample was resolved by gel electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and hybridized to a probe specific for the HPV18 E6/E7 region.
|
Effect of dominant-negative p53 tumor suppressor pathways in HeLa cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7. Expression of the E2 protein in the HeLa/16E7-3 cells leads to activation of the p53 pathway due to the repression of HPV18 E6, whereas continued expression of HPV16 E7 prevents activation of the Rb pathway (11). Western blotting was used to assess the activity of the p53 and Rb tumor suppressor pathways (Fig. 2). Full-length, wild-type p53 was expressed in all of the cell lines, and as expected, its expression was markedly induced by E2-mediated E6 repression. Full-length p53 is induced to a greater extent in cells expressing p53CTF, possibly because this dominant-negative form inhibits p53-mediated expression of mdm2 (see below), which stimulates p53 degradation. To test whether p53CTF was functioning as a dominant-negative inhibitor of the p53 pathway, we examined the expression of p21, the product of a p53-responsive gene. Expression of the E2 protein in cell lines lacking p53CTF resulted in a marked increase in p21 levels, reflecting the increased abundance of wild-type p53 in response to E6 repression. E2-mediated induction of p21 was reduced in cells expressing dominant-negative p53, despite the elevation of p53 itself by E6 repression. Induction of p21 was impaired to a greater extent in HeLa/E7-p53CTF clone 7 than in clone 4, a finding consistent with the higher levels of p53CTF in the former cells. Similarly, p53CTF blunted E2-mediated increases in p21 mRNA and in mdm2 protein and mRNA (data not shown). These results indicate that p53CTF functioned as a dominant-negative protein and inhibited the induction of p53-responsive genes after HPV18 E6 repression.
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of dominant-negative p53 expression on the p53 and Rb pathways. At 2 days after infection with the E2 virus (+) or mock infection (-), protein was harvested from HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/LXSN-p53CTF-3, HeLa/16E7-3, and HeLa/16E7-RVY-3 cells, as well as from two HeLa/16E7-p53CTF cell lines, as indicated. 5 µg or 10 µg (for cyclin A) of each sample was resolved by gel electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and probed with antibodies specific for wild-type p53, p21, p105Rb, or cyclin A, as indicated. The hyperphosphorylated and hypophosphorylated forms of p105Rb are indicated by P and O, respectively.
|
The abundance of the hyperphosphorylated form of p105Rb provided further insight into p53 activity. When both E6 and E7 were repressed in HeLa/LXSN cells, the level of hyperphosphorylated p105Rb was reduced. This reduction was not prevented by p53CTF in the HeLa/LXSN-p53CTF cells, presumably because E7 repression reduced the expression of cdc25A and cyclin A, which are required for Cdk activity. In contrast, in cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7 and p53CTF, hyperphosphorylated p105Rb persisted despite repression of E6, and this effect was more pronounced in the HeLa/16E7-p53CTF-7 cells which express more of this dominant-negative form of p53. These results imply that in cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7, E2-mediated loss of p105Rb hyperphosphorylation is p53 dependent, presumably due to p21-mediated inhibition of Cdk activity. Taken together, with the analysis of the expression of p53-responsive genes, these results demonstrate that expression of dominant-negative p53 inhibited activation of the p53 pathway in response to E6 repression.
Effect of dominant-negative p53 on E2-induced growth inhibition, senescence and apoptosis in HeLa cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7. Repression of the HPV18 E6 and E7 genes in HeLa cells causes virtually all of the cells to undergo senescence, whereas constitutive expression of HPV16 E7 allows approximately one-third of the cells to escape senescence and continue proliferating (11). Incorporation of thymidine was used to determine the effect of dominant-negative p53 on this response (Fig. 3). In HeLa/LXSN-1 and HeLa/LXSN-p53CTF cells, which do not constitutively express HPV16 E7, the E2 protein caused a profound inhibition of DNA synthesis whether or not p53CTF was expressed. In contrast, in cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7, p53CTF provided substantial protection against E2-mediated growth inhibition. In the absence of p53CTF, DNA synthesis was inhibited ca. 55% in HeLa/16E7-3 cells, whereas in the HeLa/16E7-p53CTF-7 cells, in which the p53 pathway is inactivated, DNA synthesis was essentially resistant to E2-mediated inhibition, similar to the situation where the E6 gene itself is constitutively expressed (HeLa/16E6-16E7 cells). Partial protection against growth inhibition was displayed by the HeLa/E7-p53CTF-4 cells, in which p53CTF provides partial inhibition of p53 function. DNA synthesis was inhibited to a greater extent in the p53CTF-4 cells compared to the p53CTF-7 cells in five independent experiments. Thus, p53CTF largely eliminated the E2-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis in cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of dominant-negative p53 and hTERT on cellular DNA synthesis. At 2 days after infection with the E2 virus or mock infection, HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/LXSN-p53CTF-3, HeLa/16E7-3, HeLa/16E7-RVY-3, HeLa/16E6-16E7-1 cells, as well as two HeLa/16E7-p53CTF cell lines and two HeLa/16E7-TERT cell lines, were assayed in quadruplicate for incorporation of [3H]thymidine. For each cell line, the data are displayed as the percentage of [3H]thymidine incorporation by the infected cells compared to mock-infected cells. The results of a representative experiment are shown in which the average of replicate samples are shown with error bars representing one standard deviation of the mean. Similar results were obtained in multiple independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of dominant-negative p53 expression on autofluorescence. HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/LXSN-p53CTF-3, and HeLa/16E7-3 cells, as well as two HeLa/16E7-p53CTF cell lines, were assayed for autofluorescence by flow cytometry at 6 days after infection with the E2 virus or mock infection.
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of dominant-negative p53 expression on SAß-Gal activity. HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/16E7-3, and HeLa/16E7-p53CTF-7 cells were stained for SAß-Gal activity 9 days after infection with the E2 virus. Cells were photographed with bright-field optics.
|
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effect of dominant-negative p53 expression on apoptosis. At 6 days after infection with the E2 virus (bottom panels) or mock infection (top panels), HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/16E7-3 and HeLa/16E7-p53CTF-7 cells were assayed by flow cytometry for annexin V binding and propidium iodide uptake. The percentages of cells in the proliferating-senescing quadrant (lower left) and the apoptotic quadrant (lower right) are shown.
|
These stable cell lines were analyzed to confirm that the transduced hTERT gene extended telomere length. Genomic DNA was digested with restriction endonucleases that do not cut within the telomeric repeat and analyzed by Southern blotting with a radiolabeled telomere repeat-specific oligonucleotide. In all cell lines lacking exogenous hTERT, telomeres are 1.5-4 kb in length, far shorter than the length at which primary keratinocytes senesce, and difficult to visualize. In contrast, cells carrying a transduced hTERT gene showed a dramatic increase in average telomere length in comparison to the parental HeLa/16E7-3 cells, as assessed by slow electrophoretic mobility and increased intensity of the signal generated with the telomere repeat probe (Fig. 7 and data not shown). We estimated that the length of telomeres in the HeLa/16E7-TERT clones was ca. 15 kb, similar to the telomere length in early-passage primary human keratinocytes.
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Effect of hTERT expression on telomere length. DNA was purified from the indicated cell lines, digested with HinfI plus RsaI, and subjected to electrophoresis and Southern blotting with a telomere repeat-specific probe to determine telomere length. Sizes (in kilodaltons) of marker fragments are shown at the left.
|
Effect of hTERT on HPV gene expression and tumor suppressor pathways in HeLa cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7. Expression of the HPV18 and HPV16 genes was assessed by Northern blotting (data not shown). In all of the cell lines, the E2 protein dramatically repressed the expression of endogenous HPV18 E6 and E7 genes. Furthermore, as expected, HPV16 E7 mRNA was detected in the cell lines containing a transduced E7 gene, and its level was not affected by E2 or hTERT expression. Thus, expression of the endogenous HPV18 genes and the exogenous HPV16 E7 gene was not affected by the transduced hTERT gene or the resulting elevated telomerase activity and extended telomeres.
We also tested whether the constitutive expression of hTERT affected activation of the p53 and Rb tumor suppressor pathways. Protein extracts were prepared 2 days after mock infection or infection with the E2 virus and analyzed by Western blotting (Fig. 8). In the absence of E2 expression, there was little expression of p53 or p21 in any of the cell lines, and all cell lines displayed similar patterns of p105Rb and cyclin A expression, indicating that the p53 and Rb pathways were not activated by hTERT expression. As expected, expression of the E2 protein and E6 repression markedly induced expression of both p53 and p21 in all of the cell lines (Fig. 8, top two panels). Expression of the E2 gene caused a marked increase in the level of hypophosphorylated p105Rb in the control HeLa/LXSN-1 cells but not in the cell lines constitutively expressing HPV16 E7 (Fig. 8, third panel). Similarly, the E2 protein repressed expression of cyclin A in the HeLa/LXSN-1 cells, indicating that the Rb pathway was activated in these cells, but cyclin A was not repressed in cells harboring a constitutively expressed HPV16 E7 gene (Fig. 8, bottom panel). The level of hyperphosphorylated p105Rb was decreased by the E2 protein in all of the cell lines. Notably, the presence of the transduced hTERT gene did not affect the expression of p53, p21, p105Rb, or cyclin A or their responses to the E2 protein. Therefore, in cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7, E2-mediated activation of the p53 and Rb tumor suppressor pathways was not affected by increased telomerase activity and extended telomeres.
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effect of hTERT expression on the p53 and Rb pathways. At 2 days after infection with the E2 virus (+) or mock infection (-), protein was harvested from HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/16E7-3, and HeLa/16E7-RVY-3 cells, as well as from two HeLa/16E7-TERT cell lines, as indicated. Then, 5 µg of each sample was resolved by gel electrophoresis, transferred to a membrane, and probed with antibodies specific for wild-type p53, p21, p105Rb, or cyclin A, as indicated. The hyperphosphorylated and hypophosphorylated forms of p105Rb are indicated by P and O, respectively.
|
To determine the effect of the hTERT gene on senescence, we examined autofluorescence (Fig. 9) and SAß-Gal activity (Fig. 10 and data not shown). The E2 protein induced the HeLa/LXSN-1 and the HeLa/16E7-3 cells to undergo the characteristic fluorescence shifts described in an earlier section. In cells constitutively expressing the HPV16 E7 protein, the fluorescence profiles of E2-infected cells were not affected by the transduced hTERT gene. Staining for SAß-Gal activity revealed that the E2 protein induced the appearance of enlarged, flat blue cells interspersed with proliferating colonies in both the HeLa/16E7-3 cells and HeLa/16E7-TERT cell lines. Taken together, these results suggested that increased telomerase activity and extended telomeres did not prevent E2-mediated senescence in cells constitutively expressing the HPV E7 protein.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Effect of hTERT expression on autofluorescence. HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/16E7-3, and HeLa/16E7-RVY-3 cells, as well as two HeLa/E7-TERT cell lines, were assayed for autofluorescence by flow cytometry 6 days after infection with the E2 virus or mock infection.
|
![]() View larger version (96K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Effect of hTERT expression on SAß-Gal activity. HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/16E7-3, HeLa/16E7-TERT-2-1 cells were stained for SAß-Gal activity 9 days after mock infection (top panels) or infection with the E2 virus (bottom panels). Cells were photographed with bright-field optics.
|
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. Effect of hTERT expression on apoptosis. Six days after infection with the E2 virus (bottom panels) or mock infection (top panels), HeLa/LXSN-1, HeLa/16E7-3, HeLa/16E7-TERT-2-1 cells were assayed by flow cytometry for annexin V binding and propidium iodide uptake. The percentages of cells in the proliferating-senescing quadrant (lower left) and the apoptotic quadrant (lower right) are shown.
|
|
|
|---|
We tested the ability of a dominant-negative form of p53 to inhibit senescence and apoptosis induced by E6 repression in cells constitutively expressing the HPV16 E7 protein. Dominant-negative p53 impaired signaling by the p53 pathway, as assessed by the reduced ability of E6 repression to induce expression of p53-responsive genes and, in cells expressing HPV16 E7, to prevent p105Rb hyperphosphorylation. Strikingly, elimination of p53 signaling largely prevented both senescence and apoptosis after E6 repression. Thus, continuous inactivation of the p53 pathway by the E6 protein is required for maintenance of the proliferative state of HeLa cells. The experiments reported here were conducted in HeLa cells only. However, ongoing E6 expression in the great majority of cervical cancers and cancer-derived cell lines suggests that continuous E6-mediated p53 degradation may be a general requirement for the maintenance of the transformed phenotype in cervical cancer cells.
Wells et al. (67) previously reported that the E2 protein induced senescence in HeLa cells via Rb- and p21-dependent pathways. However, both E6 and E7 were repressed in that study, a situation that complicates analysis of the cellular signaling mechanisms responsible for the observed phenotypes. We have shown here and previously (11) that the E6 and E7 proteins control distinct aspects of the biochemical and physiological phenotype of cervical carcinoma cells. By dissecting the separate contributions of the E6 and E7 proteins, we have identified a specific requirement for E6-mediated inactivation of the p53 pathway in maintaining the transformed state of cervical cancer cells.
Our results indicate that the signaling events responsible for growth inhibition, senescence, and apoptosis induced by repression of the E6 protein alone required an intact p53 pathway. This conclusion is reinforced by the finding that the protection from senescence correlated with the level of p53CTF expression and the extent of inhibition of p53 signaling. The slight residual growth inhibitory effects of E6 repression in HeLa/16E7-p53CTF cells presumably reflected incomplete inhibition of p53 signaling by p53CTF, but we have not ruled out the alternative explanation that p53-independent signaling played a minor role. The senescence and delayed apoptosis induced by the E2 protein in HeLa cells constitutively expressing HPV16 E7 is prevented by coexpression of HPV16 E6 (11). Thus, in this setting p53-dependent senescence and apoptosis required HPV E6 repression. This phenotype is distinct from p53-independent apoptosis that can be elicited by transfected E2 genes (13). This later effect does not require HPV repression but rather can be mediated by an intrinsic proapoptotic activity of the HPV18 E2 protein (12).
Interference with p53 signaling in HeLa cells has differing effects on senescence depending on whether both the E6 gene and the E7 gene are repressed or whether E6 alone is repressed. When both genes were repressed, senescence efficiently occurred whether or not p53 signaling is impaired, indicating that a p53-independent pathway can induce senescence in this setting. This is consistent with our previous findings that repression of the E7 gene alone can induce senescence without activation of the p53 pathway and that HPV30 repression can induce senescence in HT-3 cells, which lack a functional p53 pathway (11, 26). On the other hand, when the E6 gene alone was repressed, p53 signaling was required for senescence. Thus, repression of HPV gene expression mobilizes both p53-dependent and p53-independent pathways that can result in senescence.
p53 was induced either when both E6 and E7 were repressed or when E6 alone was repressed, but apoptosis occurred only in the latter situation. Therefore, repression of the E7 protein prevented p53-mediated apoptosis, possibly by inducing senescence, which can provide a protective effect against apoptosis (64). In other systems, Rb signaling can protect against p53-dependent apoptosis (3, 29, 33, 35, 48), suggesting that E7 repression may prevent apoptosis in HeLa cells by activating the Rb pathway. In fact, it has been reported that delivery of the p53 gene into HPV16-containing cervical carcinoma cell lines induced apoptosis, which was inhibited by coexpression of the gene encoding p105Rb (38).
p53-dependent senescence and apoptosis occurred after repression of the E6 protein alone in the HeLa/16E7 cells, even though Rb did not accumulate in a hypophosphorylated form, and E2F-regulated genes were not repressed. Therefore, the p53-dependent signaling cascade that results in senescence and apoptosis upon repression of the E6 gene does not appear to involve p21-mediated accumulation of hypophosphorylated Rb and repression of E2F-responsive genes. Similarly, expression of p53 or p21 can induce growth arrest and apoptosis in cells lacking Rb (1, 16, 45). The ability of p53 to induce p53-independent senescence and apoptosis might depend on other p53-regulated genes implicated in these processes, such as BAX or PERP (4, 46).
Telomere shortening can initiate replicative senescence in primary cells (2, 63), and telomerase expression in conjunction with inactivation of the Rb pathway is required for immortalization of primary keratinocytes (15, 42, 54). However, overexpression of hTERT and telomere lengthening is not sufficient to prevent senescence when the E6 protein is repressed, even though the E7 protein maintains the Rb pathway in an inactive state. Similarly, expression of hTERT in normal human fibroblasts does not prevent premature senescence induced by activated Ha-ras or other stress (27, 66). Thus, senescence initiated by activation of tumor suppressor pathways in cancer cells and premature senescence induced by various treatments of primary cells may be under different control than replicative senescence.
After E6 repression, cells that escaped senescence underwent p53-dependent apoptosis after a delay of approximately 1 week. Similarly, inhibition of telomerase in cancer cells can induce delayed apoptosis (30, 34, 71). However, E6 repression still activated the p53 pathway in cells transduced with the hTERT gene, and senescence and apoptosis still occurred. Thus, short telomeres were not required for induction of p53 or for p53-mediated senescence and apoptosis when E6 alone was repressed, just as short telomeres were not required for senescence when E6 and E7 were repressed together (23). It is possible that E6 repression induced the ongoing accumulation of cellular damage in the cells that escaped senescence, triggering apoptosis after several days once this damage exceeded a certain threshold. For example, p53 can induce the generation of reactive oxygen species, and the resulting oxidative damage may trigger apoptosis (39, 53).
Senescence did not occur in HeLa/16E6 cells unless the E7 gene is repressed, and senescence and apoptosis did not occur in the HeLa/16E7 cells unless the E6 gene is repressed. Moreover, repression of E6 was not sufficient to induce apoptosis, because apoptosis did not occur when both E7 and E6 are repressed. Thus, the cellular response to repression of the HPV oncogenes appears to be dictated by the balance between E6 and E7 expression and not by the absolute expression level of either gene. It may be possible to harness p53-mediated apoptosis as a therapeutic approach in virus-infected cells and cervical cancer cells by selective inhibition of E6 expression or activity. Indeed, the induction of apoptosis in cervical carcinoma cells by peptides that bind the E6 protein or by RNAs that inhibit E6 expression is consistent with this scenario (6, 7, 9).
The biological role of the E6 protein in the papillomavirus life cycle is unclear. Many viruses have evolved activities to inhibit apoptosis that occurs in response to virus infection and viral gene expression (see, for example, reference 10). In cultured cells and in transgenic mice, the E7 protein has proapoptotic activity which is inhibited by E6 expression and by disruption of the p53 gene (41, 51, 52, 60, 68). It is possible that an important activity of the E6 protein during the virus life cycle and carcinogenesis is to impair p53-mediated apoptosis that would otherwise occur in response to E7 expression.
L.M. was supported by a Dermatology Training Grant from the National Institutes of Health (AR07016). This study was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (CA16038).
Present address: Department of Pathology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143. ![]()
Present address: Department of Dermatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29412. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»