![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, April 2004, p. 3514-3523, Vol. 78, No. 7
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3514-3523.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Cell Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461,1 Virologie Moleculaire et Structurale, UMR 2472/1157, CNRS-INRA, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France2
Received 8 October 2003/ Accepted 21 November 2003
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
One of the best-understood viruses to use the endocytic entry pathway is the alphavirus Semliki Forest virus (SFV) (21, 42, 46). SFV is a small enveloped RNA virus with a relatively simple structure. The nucleocapsid is composed of the positive-stranded RNA genome and associated capsid protein, and the enveloping membrane contains two type I glycoproteins, E1 and E2, each about 50 kDa. E1 and E2 form stable heterodimers that associate into trimers and form an icosahedral lattice on the surface of the virus (30, 38, 53). E1 is the membrane fusion protein and contains the virus fusion peptide, while E2 binds the virus receptor and regulates the fusion activity of E1. Upon exposure to the low pH of endosomes, the E1-E2 heterodimer dissociates, allowing the E1 proteins to undergo a series of conformational changes, including the interaction of the fusion peptide region with target membranes and the formation of an extremely stable E1 homotrimer. The E1 homotrimer has been shown to be essential in viral membrane fusion (23, 47), but the molecular mechanism of the fusion reaction is not fully understood.
Extensive biochemical analysis has revealed a number of key features of the SFV fusion reaction (see reference 21 for review). Rapid and efficient fusion with either cell membranes or protein-free liposomes is triggered at a pH of about 6.2 or below (4). Both in vitro fusion and virus infection of host cells specifically require the presence of cholesterol in the target membrane (37, 51). A monomeric ectodomain form of E1 termed E1* can be produced by proteolytic cleavage (22). E1* lacks the transmembrane domain and membrane-proximal stem regions and is water soluble. Treatment of E1* at low pH in the presence of cholesterol-containing target membranes leads to insertion of the fusion peptide into the target membrane and formation of a very stable homotrimer (1, 26). Similar to the full-length homotrimer, this ectodomain homotrimer (E1*HT) is resistant to proteases, detergents, and chemical or heat denaturation (16). Thus, E1* retains biological activity. At low pH, the ectodomain recapitulates the conformational changes and membrane association that take place in E1 during fusion but is nonfusogenic due to the absence of the transmembrane domain.
A similar water-soluble ectodomain form of E1, E1
S, was purified, crystallized, and used to determine the X-ray structure of the neutral-pH form of the protein (30, 50). The native E1 molecule is an elongated three-domain structure composed mainly of ß-sheets, with the fusion peptide located in a loop at the most membrane distal tip and the transmembrane domain located at the opposite end of the molecule. Comparison of the structures of the native fusion glycoproteins of the alpha- and flaviviruses demonstrates that, despite the lack of any identifiable sequence similarity, they have a strikingly similar molecular architecture, and they have thus been grouped together as class II virus fusion proteins (30). The alphavirus and flavivirus fusion proteins share a number of interesting characteristics (reviewed in references 17 and 21). Both are regulated by their interaction with a companion subunit, which is cleaved by furin during virus biosynthesis to activate subsequent virus fusion at the pH of the endosome. During fusion both proteins convert from a native homo- or heterodimer to a stable homotrimer. Similar to SFV, the ectodomain of the fusion protein of the flavivirus tick-borne encephalitis virus forms a membrane-bound homotrimer when treated at acid pH in the presence of cholesterol-containing target membranes (45). The structures of alpha- and flavivirus particles have been characterized by cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) and reconstruction. Strikingly, although the symmetry of their arrangement on the virus surface differs, both fusion proteins lie tangential to the virus membrane and define the regular protein lattice covering the virus particle (11, 28, 30, 38, 53). Therefore, in addition to their well-documented fusion activities, these class II proteins contribute significantly to both virus particle formation during budding and virus disassembly during membrane fusion (12). However, while much is known about the native structures and their fusogenic conformational changes, the structure of the class II homotrimer, the rearrangements and motifs that mediate its high stability, and the nature of the trimer-target membrane interaction are unknown.
The class I virus fusion proteins include those of orthomyxoviruses, paramyxoviruses, retroviruses, coronaviruses, and filoviruses. The stable postfusion conformation of the class I fusion proteins has been structurally characterized for a number of these viruses (reviewed in references 8, 10, and 49). The rearrangements of the protein during fusion are best understood in the case of the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) (reviewed in reference 43), which typifies the general features shared by the class I viral fusion proteins. HA is synthesized as an inactive precursor, HA0, which is activated by proteolytic cleavage to produce a trimer of two disulfide-linked subunits, the receptor-binding HA1 and the transmembrane HA2 containing the virus fusion peptide. Upon triggering of the fusion reaction at low pH, a region of extended structure of HA2 refolds to form a continuation of the central trimeric 
-helical coiled coil. This translocates the N-terminal HA2 fusion peptide to the top of the molecule, where it can insert into the target membrane, producing an intermediate with the HA2 protein anchored in both the viral and target membranes. A C-terminal region adjacent to the virus membrane then folds back to pack in the grooves of the core coiled coil, thus producing a highly stable -helical bundle or hairpin with the HA2 transmembrane domain and fusion peptide at the same end of the molecule (5). The transition to this stable hairpin conformation drives the class I membrane fusion reaction (33, 41).
An enormous amount of information on viral fusion and fusion protein conformational changes has been derived from the work on the class I fusion proteins, but much is still unknown about how viral proteins carry out membrane fusion. Since the characterization of the hairpin structure has been performed with ectodomain fragments lacking both the fusion peptide region and the transmembrane domains, there are presently no postfusion structures of the fusion protein regions mediating membrane interaction. With the exception of influenza virus (52) and partial information on Newcastle disease virus (7), the native fusion protein structures have not been determined, therefore limiting our views of the overall protein rearrangements that lead to the final stable hairpin. Additionally, since the class I virus particles studied do not display regular structures, it has not yet been possible to analyze them by high-resolution EM. Therefore the existing protein crystal structures cannot be placed within the context of the overall macromolecular assembly to explain how individual trimers might work together during the process of fusion.
To address these and other questions about the class II virus fusion mechanism, we set out to obtain material suitable for high-resolution structural studies of the SFV E1 homotrimer. To this end, we developed a method to purify the stable membrane-inserted ectodomain homotrimer from target membranes. The purified homotrimer is detergent soluble, retains the stability of the starting homotrimer, and is free of lipid and protein contaminants. Screening of solution and crystallization conditions demonstrated substantial changes from the water-soluble native ectodomain monomer. Several habits of three-dimensional (3D) crystals were identified, at least one of which was suitable for analysis by X-ray diffraction. This is among the first viral fusion proteins to be crystallized in the postfusion conformation with the fusion peptide present and thus provides a new approach to understanding virus fusion machines and their interaction with membranes.
(Portions of the data in this paper are from a thesis submitted by D. L. Gibbons in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Sue Golding Graduate Division of Medical Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University.)
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Preparation of SFV glycoprotein ectodomains.
Soluble forms of the E1 and E2 glycoprotein subunits (E1* and E2*) were prepared as previously described (16, 22). In brief, purified unlabeled SFV (1 to 2 mg of protein) was digested with subtilisin for 60 to 90 min on ice at a protein-to-protease ratio of 
3:1 (wt/wt) in phosphate-buffered saline buffer containing 0.9 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5% Triton X-114 (TX-114). The ectodomains were then purified by TX-114 phase separation (3) and concanavalin A chromatography, followed by dialysis against morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer (20 mM MES, pH 7.0, and 130 mM NaCl). The purified proteins were stored at -140°C until use.
Liposomes. Liposomes were prepared by extrusion as previously described (6), by using equimolar amounts of cholesterol and phospholipids and a molar ratio of 1:1:1:3 phosphatidylcholine (from egg yolk)-phosphatidylethanolamine (from egg phosphatidylcholine by transphosphatidylation)-sphingomyelin (bovine brain)-cholesterol (24). Phospholipids were from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, Ala.), and cholesterol was from Steraloids (Wilton, N.H.). All liposome stocks contained either [3H]cholesterol or 125I-labeled phosphatidylcholine as a tracer.
Generation and assay of the E1* homotrimer.
Purified ectodomains (0.25 mg of total protein/ml) were mixed with liposomes at a final concentration of 1.0 mM lipid, a lipid-to-protein ratio of 12.5 nmol per µg of E1*, or 830:1 on a molar basis. The mixture was preincubated for 5 min at 37°C, adjusted to pH 5.5 by addition of a precalibrated volume of 0.5 N acetic acid, incubated for 10 min at 37°C, and then neutralized by addition of 0.5 N NaOH. The E1*HT was assayed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) on 11% polyacrylamide gels after treating samples in SDS-sample buffer (200 mM Tris, pH 8.8, 4% SDS, 10% glycerol, and 0.02% bromophenol blue) at either 30°C to preserve the homotrimer (47) or at 95°C with reduction and alkylation to separate E1* and E2* (22). Proteins were visualized by Coomassie blue (R-250) or silver staining. Alternatively, the E1*HT was assayed by digestion for 1 h at 37°C with 125 µg of trypsin (type XIII; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.)/ml in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% TX-100. The digestion was stopped by addition of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to a final concentration of 5 mM, and samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as described above.
Sucrose flotation gradients. To assay E1*-liposome binding, low-pH-treated and neutralized samples were adjusted to a final concentration of 40% (wt/vol) sucrose, layered into the bottom of TLS55 ultracentrifuge tubes, and then overlaid with 1.4 ml of 25% (wt/vol) sucrose and 0.2 ml of 5% (wt/vol) sucrose in TN buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) (26). For samples solubilized with detergent, the detergent was included throughout the gradient at a final concentration of 1.5%, except where indicated. Samples containing cholate or deoxycholate were buffered at pH 8.5 instead of pH 7.4 to prevent precipitation of the detergent during centrifugation and handling. Gradients were centrifuged in the TLS55 rotor for 3 h at 54,000 rpm at 4°C, fractionated into seven 300-µl fractions, and analyzed for the presence of protein and [3H]cholesterol. Preparative samples used an SW60 rotor with a 40% sucrose layer of 1.8 ml, a 25% sucrose layer of 2 ml, and a 5% sucrose layer of 0.2 ml. These samples were centrifuged for 3 h at 54,000 rpm, and the top three 400-µl fractions containing the membranes were collected. Following flotation, membrane-bound E1* homotrimer was stored on ice until further purification.
Purification of the E1* homotrimer by sucrose sedimentation gradients. Samples of the membrane-bound E1* homotrimer from sucrose flotation gradients were solubilized in 1.5% (wt/vol) octyl-ß-D-glucopyranoside (OG; Fluka Chemical Corp., Milwaukee, Wis.) in TN buffer for 1 h at room temperature. The mixture was concentrated to a final volume of 0.5 ml by using a Centricon microconcentrator with a 30-kDa molecular mass cutoff. The sample was layered on top of an 11.5-ml, 7 to 15% (wt/wt) sucrose gradient in TN buffer containing 1% OG and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and was centrifuged in an SW41 rotor at 4°C for 22 h at 35,000 rpm.
Purification of the E1* homotrimer by centrifugal concentrator.
Samples of the membrane-bound E1* homotrimer from sucrose flotation gradients were solubilized in 1.5% OG in TN or 1 M NaCl-50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) (HSTN buffer) for 1 h at room temperature. The sample was then concentrated to a final volume of 0.5 ml in a filtration device with a 100-kDa molecular mass cutoff (Millipore or Vivascience). The sample was repeatedly washed with fresh buffer by dilution and reconcentration to 0.5 ml. After removal of the majority of the contaminating lipid as monitored by [3H]cholesterol, the protein was exchanged into TN or HSTN buffer containing 0.7% OG and 0.02% NaN3 by several sequential washes. The final sample volume was 0.5 ml, with a typical protein concentration of 0.5 mg/ml. The samples were stored on ice or at 4°C until use.
Lipid and detergent analysis. E1*HT samples were analyzed for lipid and detergent content by thin-layer chromatography (29). Merck Silicagel 60 F254 plates were activated just prior to use by prerunning in ethyl ether and allowing them to air dry. Samples were applied in multiple small volumes with drying between applications to minimize spot size. Plates were developed in a preequilibrated tank containing a 65:25:4 mixture of CHCl3:methanol:H2O and were stained with iodine vapor to visualize the positions of OG and phospholipids. The amount of OG in the samples was estimated by comparison to standards on the same plate.
For lipid phosphate analysis, aqueous samples were extracted with methanol:CHCl3 (2) and were analyzed for total phospholipid content (36).
Dynamic light-scattering experiments. Samples of the purified E1* protein in the indicated buffers were analyzed in a DynaPro-801 DLS instrument by using the manufacturer's software for analyses (Protein Solutions, Charlottesville, Va.). This instrument uses the dynamic scattering of laser light, detected at a 90° angle, to determine the diffusion constant of the molecules in solution by photon correlation spectroscopy. The hydrodynamic radius (Rh) is calculated from this measurement and is dependent upon the viscosity and the temperature of the solution. All measurements were carried out at 19°C.
Crystal screening and X-ray diffraction. Purified E1*HT in 0.7% OG and HSTN was concentrated to 5 to 10 mg of protein/ml and a volume of about 25 to 50 µl by using a Vivaspin 500 concentrator with a molecular mass cutoff of 100 kDa (Vivascience, Inc.). Protein concentration was determined by absorbance spectroscopy at 276 nm and a calculated extinction coefficient for the E1* ectodomain of 47,810 M-1 cm-1. It was found that either 1 or 0.5 M salt maintained HT solubility during concentration and detergent exchange (see Fig. 4 and data not shown). Detergent exchange was therefore performed by diluting the 25- to 50-µl concentrated sample with 0.5 ml of 0.5 M salt (either NaCl or NaBr), 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.02% NaN3, and detergent above the critical micelle concentration (CMC) (most often 15 mM N,N-dimethyldecylamine-N-oxide [DDAO; Fluka] or 3.0 mM lauryldimethylamine-N-oxide [LDAO, N,N-dimethyldodecylamine-N-oxide; Fluka]), and reconcentrating the sample to 25 to 50 µl. This step was repeated several times to ensure proper detergent exchange. Where indicated, the E1*HT was exchanged into different detergents at this step. For screening of crystallization conditions, 1-µl aliquots of concentrated protein in the above buffer (or other test buffers) were mixed with equal volumes of a solution containing the same detergent at a concentration above the CMC, along with test additives as indicated, and the indicated concentration of polyethylene glycol (PEG) (Hampton or Merck). This 2-µl drop was then placed over a well containing the indicated PEG concentration in 0.5 M salt with or without 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. Importantly, it was found that the PEG solutions had to be aged until the pH was at least 3.5 to 4.0, producing a final pH in the drop of approximately 4.0. Using a fresh PEG solution and adjusting the pH to 4 did not yield crystals. For the crystals described in the Fig. 6 legend, the protein was concentrated in buffer containing 15 mM DDAO, 0.5 M NaBr, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 0.02% NaN3 and was then mixed 1:1 with a solution of 15 mM DDAO and aged PEG 400, at starting PEG concentrations in the drop ranging from 2.5 to 12.5% (wt/vol). These drops were supplemented with HoCl3, to a starting concentration of 10 mM. At 4°C, crystals with the shape of a hexagonal rod appeared within 1 week and grew for several weeks to approximately 200 µm in length and 60 to 80 µm in thickness as shown in Fig. 6. Preliminary diffraction data were collected at beam-line X06SA at the Swiss Light Source in Viligen, Switzerland.
|
|
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
50 to 60% of E1* to the E1*HT (1, 26). As a first step in E1*HT purification, sucrose gradient flotation was used to separate the membrane-bound homotrimer from the soluble ectodomains (E1*, E2*, and p62*). After centrifugation E1*HT cofloated in the top three or four fractions of the gradient (Fig. 1A) with the [3H]cholesterol-labeled liposomes (Fig. 1B), while the bulk of the E2* and the remaining monomeric E1* remained in the bottom fractions of the gradient. The fractions containing membrane-bound E1*HT could be stored for extended periods on ice without aggregation, denaturation, or proteolytic degradation (see also reference 16).
|
Together these data and concurrent EM studies (15) suggested that OG solubilized the E1*HT without significantly affecting its structure or biochemical properties. In addition, OG is available in highly purified form, is relatively invisible in spectroscopic measurements, is easily removed due to its high CMC, and has been extensively used for a variety of biochemical and structural studies of membrane proteins, including nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray crystallography (13, 14, 18, 19, 27, 32). The homotrimer-liposome complexes from sucrose flotation gradients were therefore solubilized with 1.5% OG at room temperature for 1 h and were sedimented on 7 to 15% sucrose gradients containing 1.5% OG. SDS-PAGE analysis showed that the E1*HT migrated as a broad peak in the middle of the gradient (Fig. 2A). The broadness of this peak might reflect different folding states, further delipidation during gradient centifugation, or other factors. This homotrimer peak was essentially lipid free as assayed by [3H]cholesterol quantitation (Fig. 2B), thin-layer chromatography, and lipid phosphate analysis of pooled gradient fractions (Fig. 2A). The top of the gradient (fractions 27 to 35) contained monomeric E1* and E2* and essentially all of the [3H]cholesterol and phospholipids. Thus, both neutral lipids and phospholipids were efficiently removed from the homotrimer during purification.
|
0.7%). Table 1 summarizes the efficiency of lipid removal as a function of wash volume. Four sequential washes with buffer containing 1.5% OG removed 98.7% of the [3H]cholesterol. Two further washes with 0.7% OG yielded E1*HT that was 99% free of lipid, as monitored by [3H]cholesterol (Table 1), 125I-labeled phosphatidylcholine, lipid phosphate analysis, or thin-layer chromatography (data not shown). Together these analyses demonstrated that microconcentrator purification removed the bulk lipids from the HT without concentrating the OG.
|
130 kDa following SDS solubilization at 30°C (Fig. 3A, lane 2). SDS-PAGE analysis of the microconcentrator filtrate showed that contaminating E1* monomer, BSA, and E2* were removed by filtration, similar to the results of the gradient purification (data not shown). Electrophoresis of increasing amounts of the purified HT under reducing conditions showed a single band with the same electrophoretic mobility as the starting E1* (Fig. 3A, lanes 3 through 5). Digestion of the purified E1*HT for 1 h with trypsin at 37°C showed that, similar to the starting trimer, the purified protein was highly resistant to proteolysis, maintaining its trimeric structure (Fig. 3B, lane 1) and showing no evidence of cleavage products (Fig. 3B, lane 2). The purified HT migrated as a single peak (fractions 13 to 19) when analyzed by sucrose gradient sedimentation as in Fig. 2 and thus by this criterion was less heterogeneous than the gradient-purified HT (data not shown).
|
0.5 mg/ml (Fig. 4A1, 0.7% OG). Preliminary small-angle X-ray-scattering experiments confirmed this observation (data not shown). Upon dilution of the detergent below the CMC, the protein became markedly heterogeneous and progressively aggregated over a time scale of minutes, as indicated by the presence of multiple peaks with much larger Rh values (Fig. 4A2, 0.08% OG). These results are consistent with EM analysis of similar samples that showed that purified E1*HT formed rosettes upon detergent dilution or dialysis (15). The aggregation of the E1*HT was partially reversible by adding back OG to a final concentration above the CMC (data not shown). Although monomeric E1* is stable in buffers containing 100 to 130 mM NaCl (22, 26), the purified E1*HT aggregated in low-salt buffer (100 mM NaCl) in spite of the presence of OG at concentrations at or above the CMC (0.7 to 1.0%) (Fig. 4B1). This behavior was partially reversible by adjusting the salt concentration back to 1 M (Fig. 4B2). Results from the literature and independent measurements of the detergent monomer-to-micelle transition (not shown) both indicated that the effective CMC of OG is decreased at high salt concentrations (48). This enhanced detergent effect may explain the more uniform behavior of the protein in high salt. In addition, the purified E1*HT may have both strongly polar and hydrophobic surfaces, leading to a requirement for both high salt and detergent to maintain optimal solubility (see Discussion). Based on these results the purification protocol was modified to include high salt (1.0 M) in the buffer washes, resulting in easier removal of the lipids (Table 1) and significantly improved protein recovery. 3D crystal screening. Initial crystallization trials were based on the E1*HT in OG solution using the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method (31). Extensive screening of standard matrices generally produced disappointing results, yielding only amorphous precipitate or extensive phase separation in the drops. Attempts to lower the initial OG concentration in order to avoid phase separation were unsuccessful and usually produced protein precipitation, as discussed above. The purified protein was therefore exchanged into other detergents, including dodecyl-ß-D-maltoside, LDAO, and DDAO. Initial crystals were obtained in 3.0 mM LDAO, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.25 M NaCl, 18 to 23% PEG 400, and 2.5 mg of protein/ml (initial concentrations) (Fig. 5A). At 19°C the crystals developed in 24 to 72 h and grew for 10 to 14 days. DDAO produced crystals under similar conditions (15 mM DDAO, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.25 M NaCl, and 9 to 11.5% PEG 400). Both detergents were effective over a range of concentrations at or above the CMC, and the crystals appeared as trigonal or hexagonal rods. These crystals never grew thicker than about 40 to 50 µm and yielded diffraction data to about 5 to 7 Å.
|
The final salt conditions in the crystallization drop had a pronounced effect on the crystal quality. At lower salt concentrations (e.g., 50 mM) the crystals were more rounded, while at increasing concentrations up to 0.5 M the crystals became more regular, with better overall morphology of both the rod and plate forms. At final salt concentrations greater than 0.75 M the solutions had a pronounced tendency to phase separate, yielding either no crystals or crystals of poor quality. Substitution of NaBr for NaCl produced crystals of the same form, but the NaBr crystals often grew more quickly, at lower PEG concentrations (4 to 12% PEG 400), and diffracted to higher resolution, although they were less stable over time (both in the mother drop and in the X-ray beam).
Crystallization of membrane proteins is often quite sensitive to the presence of additives (including impurities from commercial detergents and chemicals) (13, 27, 44). We therefore tested crystallization by using a primary detergent with a variety of additives, including other detergents at very low concentrations, the substances found in the Hampton Additive Screens 1, 2, and 3, and the Hampton heavy atom screen. The combinations of primary and additive detergents that were tried included the following: LDAO+OG, OG+LDAO, LDAO + dodecylmaltoside, LDAO + C12E8, and LDAO + SDS. The other additives that were used included chaotropes, polyamines, micelle-manipulating amphiphiles (e.g., 1,2,3-heptanetriol), and various nonvolatile and volatile organics. The most interesting results were found with the alcohols, especially isopropanol and ethanol. For both the plate- and rod-shaped crystals, crystal growth was aided by the presence of the alcohol (1.5 to 6%), producing fewer but larger crystals at lower PEG concentrations. The presence of the alcohol appeared to affect the nucleation event, possibly by modulating the micelle size, changing the way in which the protein interacted with the detergent, or lowering the overall protein solubility. An important variable was found to be the PEG solutions used for the crystallization, which needed to be aged until the pH reached 3.5 to 4.0, as described in Materials and Methods. This may reflect the reported generation of aldehydes in PEG solutions (39), which could be acting as an important additive during crystallization. To screen for heavy atom derivatives, we soaked preformed crystals in various solutions of heavy atoms. These tests revealed that holmium bound the protein in a fashion that stabilized the oligomer, producing better diffraction data. Similarly, crystal growth in the presence of 10 mM HoCl3 yielded better-diffracting crystals with a more regular morphology.
All of the crystal forms were extremely sensitive to temperature during both the nucleation and growth phases. At temperatures higher than 20°C crystals did not form at all or required higher precipitant concentrations (5 to 10% more PEG 400), while preformed crystals began to dissolve at temperatures higher than 20 to 22°C. The presence of alcohols as additives made the crystals more resistant to the effects of higher temperatures. Incubation at 4°C produced overall results similar to those found at 19°C with the same conditions, although the crystals appeared and grew more slowly and at lower PEG 400 concentrations. The 4°C crystals were generally larger and produced better diffraction data.
Optimal crystals for X-ray diffraction were grown at 4°C from hanging drops under starting conditions of 15 mM DDAO, 0.25 M NaBr, 10 mM HoCl3, 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 2.5 to 12.5% PEG 400, and a final measured pH of 4.0, yielding hexagonal rods from 40 to 80 µm thick and of variable length, usually 200 to 300 µm. A representative example of these crystals is shown in the left panel in Fig. 6. The right panel in Fig. 6 shows a sample diffraction pattern of a crystal analyzed with synchrotron radiation, displaying diffraction extending equally well in all directions. The crystals were found to belong to the space group P3121, with cell parameters of a = b = 196.702 and c = 115.506, = ß = 90°, and 
= 120°. The crystals are very sensitive to radiation damage, which has so far limited the overall resolution of the diffraction data (3.18-Å resolution for the diffraction pattern shown in Fig. 6, right panel). We are currently in the process of determining the structure of the homotrimer by a combination of multiwavelength anomalous dispersion and isomorphous replacement.
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Previous experiments demonstrated that low pH specifically triggers both virus fusion and E1* association with target membranes containing cholesterol and sphingolipid (9, 26). The fusion peptide of the membrane-inserted E1* is strongly associated with cholesterol-enriched membrane domains ("rafts"), and detergent conditions that preserve rafts also fail to solubilize E1* (1). Interestingly, not all detergents that maintained the purified E1*HT in solution allowed effective initial delipidation of the protein. For example, if the same microconcentrator protocol was used, LDAO did not efficiently separate the protein from the [3H]cholesterol marker (data not shown). This may suggest differences in the solubilization of cholesterol and/or rafts or in the detergent's ability to replace a protein-cholesterol interaction. While the OG-purified E1*HT was free of detectable lipid, given the limitations of the assays, it is possible that stoichiometric amounts of lipid could remain associated with the protein, perhaps specifically.
In parallel with the experiments reported here, we also characterized the membrane-inserted E1 homotrimer by EM (15). Visualization of E1*HT on membranes by negative staining and cryo-EM revealed that the protein reorients perpendicular to the target membrane and inserts the tip of domain II into the membrane. The bulk of the trimer remains exposed to solution. These extramembranous trimer domains can associate in hexagonal arrays on the membrane surface, enabling a three-dimensional reconstruction of this portion of the protein to 25-Å resolution. Solubilization in OG disrupts these intertrimer interactions, but dilution or removal of the detergent in the presence of lipids allows the E1*HT to reassociate with membranes and reform hexagonal lattices. Such cooperative interactions of the HT may be important in the membrane fusion mechanism (15). These results were important to the experiments reported here, since the EM demonstrated that the E1*HT has both domains that mediate trimer-membrane interaction and domains that confer trimer-trimer interaction.
The requirements for purification of the E1*HT agree with the multifaceted nature of the E1 protein observed in the previous biochemical and EM studies. Release of the E1*HT from the target membrane required detergent. Both the EM and dynamic light-scattering results indicated that the purified homotrimer acts as a bona fide membrane protein, requiring micellar concentrations of detergent to remain soluble. The detergent-solubilized, purified molecule remains a highly stable trimer, in keeping with stability being conferred by protein-protein interactions within the trimer, rather than by the interaction of the protein with the membrane (16). The need for high ionic strength to prevent the formation of E1*HT aggregates or higher-order oligomers suggests that E1*HT has a tendency to interact via the water-soluble regions. In agreement with this biochemical property, the EM studies showed that formation of the hexagonal lattice was most efficient at lower salt concentrations (150 mM NaCl).
The factors governing the crystallization of membrane-associated proteins are not well understood or predictable. The type of membrane interaction displayed by the E1* homotrimer, with the bulk of the protein exposed to solution, is the most favorable for producing high-quality 3D crystals because the mechanism of crystallization is generally governed by the same principles as for soluble proteins (27, 44). Clearly the choice of detergent was a critical variable in our studies. OG was very effective for E1*HT purification and produced the protein used here for successful 3D crystallization. The OG-solubilized protein also generated 2D crystals upon detergent dialysis and membrane reconstitution (15). However, OG was not useful as a detergent for maintaining the purified E1*HT during the actual generation of 3D crystals. In contrast, both DDAO and LDAO, with a simpler alkyl (C10 or C12) amine structure, allowed crystallization under several different sets of conditions, even though LDAO was less efficient at the initial solubilization and delipidation of membrane-associated E1*HT, as discussed above. Similar to results with other detergent-soluble proteins, we found that the E1*HT could crystallize either from the aqueous phase or from a hydrophobic, detergent-rich phase. The latter crystals were platelike and tended to grow in the plane of the plate rather than in thickness. This is analogous to the 2D hexagonal lattice discussed above (15) and suggests that the hexagonal platelike crystals might be associated with detergent micelle surfaces, similar to the association of the 2D lattice with the membrane surface.
The SFV E1*HT crystallized with the intact fusion peptide, while all of the postfusion structures of the class I proteins to date have been determined by using ectodomain fragments missing the fusion peptide. The postfusion structures of the class I proteins also have the bulk of the protein exposed to solution, with the membrane interaction mediated by the fusion peptide. However, in general the class I fusion peptides are located at or near the N terminus, and their structures may not be comparable to those of the class II fusion peptides. In addition, the membrane-inserted fusion peptide of the influenza virus HA, unlike that of SFV, was not found to be associated with membrane rafts (1). Nonetheless, it is very possible that these apparent differences are not limiting and that the postfusion forms of some class I proteins can be crystallized with their fusion peptides. This would allow direct comparison of the structural basis by which the two classes anchor in target membranes. Perhaps most importantly, though, the solution of the E1*HT structure will answer many questions about the overall refolding reaction used by the class II proteins to mediate membrane fusion.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This work was supported by a grant to M.K. from the Public Health Service (R01 GM52929) and by Cancer Center Core Support Grant NIH/NCI P30-CA13330. The work was also supported by grants to F.A.R. from the CNRS and INRA, the "SESAME Program of the Region Ile-de-France," "the Foundation pour la Recherche Medicale," "the Association pour la Recherche contre le cancer," and the "CNRS programs Physique et Chimie du Vivant and Dynamique et reactivite des assemblages biologiques." D.L.G. was supported through the Medical Scientist Training Program of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine (NIH T32 GM07288) and by the Albert Cass Traveling Fellowship Award and the CNRS.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
