![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
J. Wade Harper,2,
Thomas R. Broker,1 and
Louise T. Chow1*
Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama,1 Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas2
Received 7 May 2004/ Accepted 3 August 2004
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Proteins that shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus often possess short peptide sequences that are recognized by transporting factors. Proteins with a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) can be transported into the nucleus by a family of importin 
/ß heterodimers, while those with a nuclear export sequence (NES) can form a complex with export receptors (exportins) and RanGTP to be transported from the nucleus (31, 34, 50, 72). The activities of the NLS and NES are often regulated by posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation, that can control the affinity for and accessibility by the protein transporters (31, 32). As an example, CDK phosphorylation of the human Cdc6 protein is thought to expose an NES and promote its export from the nucleus after initiation of replication (20, 33). Translocation is mediated by the nuclear export receptor CRM1 (24, 66). In contrast, cyclin B1, which is essential for the cell cycle to progress to mitosis, is shuttled out of the nucleus during interphase, attributable to the activity of a potent NES (7, 22, 75). Phosphorylation of a single serine residue within the NES at G2/M phase promotes its retention in the nucleus by disrupting the specific cyclin B1-CRM1 interaction (78, 79). In the present work, we describe our findings that the replicative DNA helicase E1 of the human papillomavirus (HPV) possesses a potent NES and that its nucleocytoplasmic localization is controlled by cyclin/CDK complexes, thereby regulating viral DNA replication.
HPVs comprise a family of small DNA tumor viruses specific for squamous mucosal or cutaneous epithelia. Infections can trigger hyperproliferation of epithelial keratinocytes and cause benign warts or condylomata. Lesions associated with certain higher-risk HPV genotypes can progress to neoplastic dysplasias and malignant cancers (84). Most infections, however, are latent, and the viral DNA persists as extrachromosomal plasmids in low copy numbers in the basal germinal stratum as a result of minimal expression of the viral genes. Viral transcription is activated in differentiated keratinocytes, especially during episodes of temporary or long-term immunosuppression. Viral DNA replication requires the cellular DNA machinery, including DNA polymerase /primase, DNA polymerase 
, replication protein A (RPA), PCNA, and topoisomerases (36, 80). The virus encodes oncoprotein E7. Its expression in differentiated keratinocytes reestablishes an S-phase environment to support viral DNA amplification in a subset of these cells in the mid- to upper strata (11, 23).
Initiation of viral DNA replication requires the HPV origin recognition protein E2 and the replicative helicase E1 (12, 13, 25, 28, 36, 42, 61-64, 73, 80, 81). The dimeric E2 protein (40 kDa per subunit) binds to three recognition sites in the ori sequence and recruits the E1 protein (70 kDa). Facilitated by heat shock-chaperone proteins, the HPV type 11 (HPV-11) E1 protein assembles into a dihexameric, bidirectional DNA helicase (42). In the presence of RPA and topoisomerase I, the E1 protein unwinds the supercoiled ori DNA efficiently (42). E1 also recruits RPA (45) and the DNA polymerase /primase to the replication fork to initiate replication (2, 8, 14, 47, 55). E1 is essential throughout initiation and elongation whereas E2 is required only for the assembly of the pre-RC (43).
In addition, the E1 protein interacts with cyclin E (16, 46). In vitro, E1 binds multiple cyclins and is phosphorylated by the corresponding cyclin/CDK complexes, with the exception of cyclin D/CDK4. This interaction requires the consensus RxL cyclin binding motif, which is located in the amino-terminal domain of the E1 protein (46). There are four candidate CDK phosphorylation sites in HPV-11 E1, namely, S89, S93, S107, and T468, each followed by a proline (Fig. 1A). Mutation of all four residues or of the RxL motif severely compromises transient replication of viral origin-containing plasmids in transfected cells (46), suggesting that E1 phosphorylation by cyclin/CDK is critical for initiation of viral DNA replication. The mechanism was not understood. It remained a formal possibility that one or more of the mutations may have crippled E1 helicase assembly or activity. Since HPV replication depends on S-phase entry, it was not entirely unexpected that the E1 DNA helicase could be subject to regulation by cyclin/CDK, as occurs with the host cell MCM2-7 helicase complex. However, the purpose of the virus is to produce progeny virions. If phosphorylation of E1 also prevents reinitiation as is observed with the cellular replication proteins, how could the viral DNA amplify in the nondividing keratinocytes to productive copy numbers?
|
|
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The anti-EE monoclonal antibody has been described elsewhere (13, 26, 36). For immunoprecipitation, the anti-EE antibody was cross-linked to CNBr-activated Sepharose 4 FastFlow beads (Amersham Biosciences Corp., Piscataway, N.J.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Phosphoserine/threonine-proline-specific monoclonal antibody MPM-2 was purchased from Upstate USA (Charlottesville, Va.), the anti-GFP monoclonal antibody JL-8 and polyclonal antibody were from Clontech Laboratories (Palo Alto, Calif.), and anti-mouse immunoglobulin G-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) conjugate was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, Oreg.).
Cell culture, transfection, and drug treatment. COS7, 293, and p21-9 cells (9) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were transfected by electroporation as described previously (13, 83). Cells were treated with roscovitine (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) at 20 µM 4 h posttransfection and cultured for another 20 h. For p21cip induction, isopropyl-ß-thiogalactosidase (IPTG) (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.) was added to the culture medium to a final concentration of 50 µM 4 h posttransfection, and the cells were grown for an additional 20 h. Leptomycin B (LMB; Sigma) at 5 µg/ml was added to the culture medium to a final concentration of 20 ng/ml at 24 h posttransfection, and the cells were cultured for 6 more h.
Fluorescence microscopy. After electroporation, 105 cells were grown on two-well chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, Ill.). Some were treated with the various chemicals, as described above. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at the indicated times. For GFP-11E1 and GFP-11E2 observations, slides were directly overlaid with coverslips by using mounting media with DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.). Immunostaining of EE-E1 was performed using monoclonal anti-EE antibody followed by anti-mouse immunoglobulin G-FITC conjugate. These slides were mounted with DAPI-containing media. Images were captured and processed with an Olympus AX70 fluorescence microscope with FITC-DAPI filters by using an AxioCam charge-coupled device digital camera (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Protein purification, immunoprecipitation, and protein phosphatase treatment. Purification of Esherichia coli-expressed EE-E1 and Sf9-expressed EE-E1 protein was described previously (36, 42, 46). For EE-E1 immunoprecipitation, 5 x 107 COS7 cells or 1.5 x 108 293 cells transfected with pMTX-EE-E1dm plasmid were lysed in 5 ml of NETN buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na-EDTA, 5 mM NaF, 0.5% NP-40) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Lysates were mixed with 200 µl of Sepharose 4 beads to which anti-EE antibody was coupled at 4°C overnight and then extensively washed five times with NETN buffer. Proteins were eluted with 400 µl of 0.1 M glycine buffer (pH 3.0) and neutralized with 4 µl of 1.5 M Tris-Cl buffer (pH 9.0). The final solution was concentrated using Nanosep Centrifugal columns (Pall Co., Ann Arbor, Mich.). The concentrations of EE-E1 proteins recovered were determined by Western blotting with anti-EE antibody with known concentrations of purified EE-E1 as a standard. Fifty nanograms each was used for subsequent analysis. For phosphatase 1 treatment, 2 µl of purified or immunoprecipitated EE-E1 (50 ng) was mixed with 1 U of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) catalytic subunit (Sigma) in reaction buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 0.1 mM Na-EDTA, 1 mM MnCl2) to a final volume of 10 µl. The mixture was incubated at 30°C for an hour. All samples were resolved by electrophoresis through sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-8% polyacrylamide gels, followed by immunoblotting with individual antibodies and detection by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents (Amersham). The MPM-2 antibody was used to detect phosphorylated proteins. The membranes were stripped and reprobed with monoclonal anti-EE antibody. GFP-11E1 immunoprecipitation from transfected COS7 cells was performed in similar fashion, except that a polyclonal anti-GFP antibody was used to recover the fusion protein, and bound protein was eluted from protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham) with 2x SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer and subjected to immunoblotting. MPM-2 was used to detect phosphorylated protein. The membranes were stripped and reprobed with monoclonal anti-GFP antibody (JL-8).
Transient-replication assays.
Transient-replication assays were performed using 293 cells as described elsewhere (13, 21). In each assay, 50 to 500 ng of the pGFP-11E1 plasmid, 5 µg of the pMT2-E2 plasmid, and 0.5 µg of HPV-11 origin-containing plasmid p7730-99 were cotransfected into 5 x 106 cells by electroporation. Cells were harvested 48 h posttransfection, and low-molecular-weight DNA was isolated. One half of the recovered DNA was digested with HindIII restriction endonuclease to linearize the ori plasmid. The other half was double digested with HindIII together with DpnI, which cut the unreplicated input plasmids into small fragments. Standard Southern blotting was then performed using [-32P]dCTP-labeled probes prepared from the ori plasmid p7730-99. The results were analyzed with a PhosphorImager instrument (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
E1 is phosphorylated by CDKs in vivo. Our previous report showed that the HPV-11 E1 protein is phosphorylated by multiple cyclin/CDK complexes in vitro (46). We asked whether the E1 protein is also phosphorylated in vivo. HPV-11 E1 tagged at its amino terminus with a Glu-rich (EE) epitope was expressed in E. coli, insect Sf9 cells, monkey COS7 cells, and human 293 cells. The EE-E1 protein functions as a potent DNA helicase in vitro and is replication competent in transient-replication and cell-free replication assays (36, 42, 46). The protein was purified from E. coli and Sf9 cells as described previously (36, 42-44) or was immunoprecipitated from transfected mammalian cells by using Sepharose beads conjugated to monoclonal antibody to the EE epitope. The recovered protein was then analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotted with an antibody specific for phospho-Ser/Thr-Pro resulting from phosphorylation by CDKs. Of several such antibodies tested, only MPM-2 (18) specifically recognizes phosphorylated EE-E1. Figure 1B shows that this antibody detected EE-E1 protein expressed in insect and mammalian cells (lanes 3, 5, and 8). However, if the EE-E1 was first treated with PP1, a serine/threonine phosphatase, reactivity with the MPM-2 antibody was abolished (Fig. 1B, lanes 4, 6, and 9), while reactivity with the anti-EE antibody was unchanged (Fig. 1B, lanes 3 to 6, 8, and 9). EE-E1 purified from E. coli was not phosphorylated and was detected only by the anti-EE antibody, not by MPM-2 antibody, with or without PP1 treatment (Fig. 1B, lanes 1 and 2). Collectively, these results demonstrate the specificity of the MPM-2 antibody and the fact that the HPV-11 E1 is indeed phosphorylated in eukaryotic cells.
To substantiate this conclusion, we treated COS7 cells expressing EE-E1 for 20 h with 20 µM roscovitine. Roscovitine is a purine derivative that reversibly competes for ATP binding and specifically inhibits the activity of CDK1 and CDK2 but has no effect on CDK4 and CDK6 (19, 49), nor on the mitogen-activated protein kinases (4), which have the same consensus substrate sites as CDKs do. Upon treatment with roscovitine, the ability to detect EE-E1 with the MPM-2 antibody was abolished (Fig. 1B, lane 7). Thus, we conclude that the HPV E1 protein is phosphorylated in vivo by one or more CDK complexes on the consensus CDK substrate site(s). Mutational analyses described below strongly suggest that CDK phosphorylation substrates included S89, S93, and S107.
Single mutations in S89, S93, or S107 significantly reduce nuclear localization. We have previously shown that mutant forms of E1, in which the consensus cyclin binding motif or all four CDK phosphorylation sites were mutated, exhibited very low transient replication activities (46). We have also shown that, in the majority of the transfected cells, wild-type GFP-11E1 is restricted to the nucleus, whereas a small percentage of the cells exhibit cytoplasmic or pancellular signals (21). To understand the mechanism by which CDK phosphorylation regulates the E1 replication activity, we asked whether phosphorylation could affect its subcellular localization. Thus, we tracked the subcellular localization of GFP-11E1 fusion protein after the incorporation of single or multiple Ser-to-Ala mutations at the candidate CDK phosphorylation sites. Direct fluorescence microscopy of GFP-11E1 or mutations was conducted in the monkey kidney epithelial cell line COS7 and in the human kidney epithelial cell line 293. The results were identical. Only images from COS7 are presented, as these cells are larger, more adherent, and more suitable for such investigations.
Unlike the wild-type GFP-11E1, the majority of cells expressing the S89A, S93A, or S107A single mutations exhibited significant cytoplasmic signals (Fig. 1C). S107A was most defective in nuclear localization. More than 80% of the cells with GFP-11E1 S107A contained only cytoplasmic signals, whereas in S89A- and S93A-expressing cells about 60 to 70% had exclusive cytoplasmic signals. In the remaining cells for all three mutations, there was some nuclear signal in addition to a dominant cytoplasmic signal. In contrast, the GFP-11E1 T468A protein was detected predominantly in the nucleus, as with the wild-type GFP-11E1 protein (Fig. 1C). Since the T468A mutation did not affect the nucleocytoplasmic localization of E1, the subsequent experiments were mainly focused on the first three serine residues.
With the three double mutations S89,93A, S89,107A, and S93,107A, more than 90% of the transfected cells had exclusively cytoplasmic GFP-11E1 protein (Fig. 1C). When all three serine residues or all four CDK substrates were mutated, as in S89,93,107A and S89,93,107,T468A, all the GFP-11E1 protein was restricted to the cytoplasm (Fig. 1C). These observations strongly suggest that CDK phosphorylations on S89, S93, and S107 are all required for effective retention of E1 in the nucleus, with S107 being the most critical residue for this function.
Lack of phosphorylation by cyclin/CDK leads to cytoplasmic E1. A prediction from the above interpretation is that E1 mutations unable to bind cyclins and no longer phosphorylated by CDK complexes should exhibit a phenotype similar to that for the phosphorylation site mutations. Thus, we constructed and tested GFP-11E1 mutated in the consensus cyclin binding motif RxL (46). The RRL tripeptide was mutated to RRA, KRA, or ARA (see Fig. 3A). The ARA mutation has previously been shown to disrupt the binding to cyclins (46). Our recent experiments showed that HPV-11 E1 protein had a bipartite NLS, which partially overlaps the cyclin binding motif, and that mutation of the RR residues decreased E1 nuclear localization (J. H. Yu, W. Deng, B. Y. Lin, T. R. Broker, and L. T. Chow, unpublished observation) (see Fig. 3A). Without alteration of the basic residues, the RRA and perhaps KRA mutations are not expected to compromise the NLS activity. This supposition is demonstrated for the RRA mutation, as will be described below (see Fig. 3B for the localization of RRA-NEm). Interestingly, we observed that all three mutant proteins were localized to the cytoplasm (Fig. 2A, left panel). Western blotting with the phospho-S/TP-specific antibody MPM-2 failed to detect the GFP-11E1 RRA, although the protein was observed at a level similar to that of the wild-type protein by using an anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 2A, right panel, compare lanes 2 and 3). In contrast, the wild-type GFP-11E1, which is primarily nuclear (Fig. 1C), was detected by the MPM-2 and GFP antibodies, consistent with the observation made with the EE-E1 protein (Fig. 1B). In addition, the GFP-11E1 S89,93,107,T468A protein, which is exclusively cytoplasmic (Fig. 1C), did not produce a detectable signal when probed with the MPM-2 antibody (Fig. 2A, right panel, lane 1). Collectively, these results support our interpretation that E1 phosphorylation at S89, S93, and S107 is required for efficient nuclear localization.
|
|
In another experiment, we used elevated p21cip1 expression to interfere with CDK activity. p21cip1 is a potent inhibitor of cyclin E/CDK2 and cyclin A/CDK2 complexes that regulate the G1/S-phase transition and also plays a key role in G1/S or G2 checkpoints following DNA damage (1, 65, 69). We transfected the GFP-11E1 expression vector into the p21-9 cell line. This cell line is derived from HT1080 human fibrosarcoma cells with an inducible p21cip1 under the control of the bacterial lacI repressor (9). Maximal induction of the p21cip1 protein is achieved by adding IPTG to the medium at 50 µM for 14 to 24 h (9). In the absence of IPTG, the GFP-11E1 protein was primarily nuclear, as in COS7 or 293 cells. Upon induction with IPTG, GFP-11E1 was observed in the cytoplasm in the majority of the cells (Fig. 2C, left panel). In contrast, induction of p21cip1 expression did not change the nuclear localization of GFP-11E2 (Fig. 2C, right panel). Collectively, these results with two different CDK inhibitors support the conclusion that phosphorylation of E1 by cyclin/CDK complexes, particularly CDK2, is required for E1 nuclear retention. These results also suggest that HPV-11 E2 is not subjected to the same regulation as HPV-11 E1 in its subcellular localization.
Mutations in E1 phosphorylation sites promote CRM1-mediated nuclear export. To determine whether phosphorylation affected E1 nuclear import or nuclear export, we treated the cells with LMB. LMB is a natural product which binds to the nuclear export receptor CRM1 in a highly specific manner and efficiently inhibits nuclear export (35, 53). We treated COS7 cells expressing wild-type GFP-11E1 proteins with 20 ng of LMB/ml for 6 h (Fig. 2D). Virtually all cells were observed to have the wild-type GFP-11E1 protein in the nucleus. In untreated cells, about 20% contained some cytoplasmic signal, as described previously (21). With GFP-11E1 S107A, GFP-11E1 S89,93,107A, and GFP-11E1 RRA, exposure to LMB led to exclusive or significant nuclear signals, in contrast to their original, primarily cytoplasmic distribution in the absence of LMB (compare Fig. 2D with Fig. 1C and 2A). Prolonged treatment with LMB increased nuclear localization, and all the protein was localized to the nucleus at 11 h (data not shown). Similarly, all other E1 phosphorylation site mutations were also found in the nucleus upon LMB treatment (data not shown). Collectively, these results demonstrated that cytoplasmic distribution for each of these E1 mutations was caused by the rapid, continuous export from the nucleus mediated by CRM1. These observations also indicate that neither the loss of phosphorylation by CDK nor the mutation in the consensus cyclin binding motif (RRL) was able to abolish its nuclear entry completely.
A conserved, putative leucine-rich NES controls E1 export. CRM1 binds specifically to proteins with a leucine-rich NES and, in a complex with RanGTP, transports the cargo out of the nucleus (66). The leucine-rich NES is a short peptide sequence sufficient to promote rapid protein export from the nucleus (22, 75). It has a core sequence of about 10 residues that are highly enriched with large hydrophobic residues such as leucine, isoleucine, and valine. A consensus sequence for the core peptide has been proposed to be L-X (2-3)-L/I/V/F/M-X (2-3)-L-X-L/I (7). Upon inspecting the entire E1 sequence with special attention to the region close to the three CDK substrates, we identified only one region (residues 82 to 126) which is rich in leucine, isoleucine, or valine residues (Fig. 3A), and contains a putative NES core consensus sequence, ISPRLDAIKL (residues 106 to 115, green underlining).
To test whether this region might be an NES, we mutated two of the hydrophobic resides (L110 and I113) in this putative core sequence to alanine (designated NEm) in the wild-type GFP-11E1 and in a number of CDK phosphorylation site mutations. Expression vectors for these mutations were separately transfected into COS7 cells. The nuclear signals of S89A-NEm, S93A-NEm, and S89,93,107A-NEm were increased to differing extents. In contrast, the wild-type E1-NEm and S107A-NEm were both exclusively nuclear (Fig. 3B, compare with Fig. 1C). The dramatic difference between S107A and S107A-NEm, compared with the other phosphorylation site mutations and the corresponding NEm, suggests that the primary function of phosphorylation of S107 is to inactivate the NES.
CDK phosphorylation inactivates the NES of the E1 protein. To substantiate our hypothesis that one of the critical roles of CDK phosphorylation is to inactivate the NES, we also introduced the NEm into the GFP-11E1 RRA mutated in the consensus cyclin binding motif. GFP-11E1 RRA was cytoplasmic and was not detected by the MPM-2 antibody in Western blot assays (Fig. 2A). The introduction of the NEm did not restore CDK phosphorylation, as the protein did not react with the MPM-2 antibody (Fig. 2A, right panel, lanes 3 and 4). Nevertheless, the GFP-11E1 RRA-NEm protein was primarily located in the nucleus (Fig. 3B). Thus, this observation supports our hypotheses that the L110A,I113A mutation inactivates the NES and that the NES mutation can at least partially substitute for the requirement for CDK phosphorylation for E1 nuclear retention. We also treated cells transfected with the NEm mutations with roscovitine. This CDK inhibitor caused the wild-type E1 protein to redistribute to the cytoplasm (Fig. 2B), but it had no effect on the subcellular localization of any of the NES mutations (data not shown). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the NES is effectively inactivated by the L110A,I113A mutation and hence that CDK phosphorylation is no longer necessary for its inactivation. Moreover, these results also support our hypothesis that the leucine-rich peptide spanning residues 106 to 115 is indeed an NES core sequence and that one of the functions of CDK complexes is to inactivate it by phosphorylation, primarily on S107.
The above localization experiments were conducted by direct observation of GFP-11E1 protein and mutant forms of this protein. The GFP-11E1 protein is fully functional in supporting transient replication (21). To verify that our observations are not confounded by the GFP moiety, we expressed wild-type and mutant forms of EE-E1 protein in COS7 cells. Indirect immunofluorescence staining of EE-E1, EE-E1 S107A, and EE-E1 S107A-NEm with antibody to the EE epitope showed that each of the proteins exhibited exactly the same pattern of subcellular localization as did the corresponding GFP-11E1 counterparts (Fig. 3C, compare with Fig. 1C and 3B). EE-E1 was observed in the nucleus in most cells. EE-E1 S107A was primarily in the cytoplasm, whereas EE-E1 S107A-NEm was localized entirely in the nucleus. Hence, through observations made on both GFP-tagged and EE-tagged E1, we demonstrated that E1 phosphorylation by CDKs determines its nuclear localization through the disruption of a leucine-rich NES by phosphorylation, primarily on S107.
Delineation of a bona fide leucine-rich NES in the E1 protein. To define the NES of the E1 protein, we fused a series of short peptides spanning the 10-amino-acid NES core (residues 106 to 115) to the C terminus of the GFP. We limited the region between residues 86 and 119 purposefully to circumvent any complications which might result from the NLS or from phosphorylation by cyclin/CDK, the association of which depends on the consensus cyclin binding motif (residues 124 to 126). As shown in Fig. 3D, because of it small size, GFP alone was observed both in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm. The localization of the fusion proteins showed that all E1 peptides which contain residues 96 to 115 conferred an exclusive cytoplasmic localization on GFP. Each contains the 10-amino-acid-long core sequence (residues 106 to 115) and also includes two additional valine residues (Fig. 3A, green box). In contrast, the 10-amino-acid core sequence was not sufficient (Fig. 3D). Thus, we defined a bona fide leucine-rich NES in E1 between residues 96 and 115, and this sequence is necessary and sufficient for export from the nucleus.
E1 replication activity correlates with its subcellular localization. If one of the functions of E1 phosphorylation is to determine its nuclear localization, this would explain why the E1 S89,93,107,T468A mutation supported virus origin DNA replication in vivo extremely poorly, if at all (46). A prediction of this conclusion is that, if we could abolish nuclear export, we might observe a recovery of the replication activities of mutations that can no longer be phosphorylated by CDKs. We thus performed transient-replication assays to test this hypothesis (Fig. 4). 293 cells were cotransfected with 50 to 500 ng of GFP-11E1 expression plasmid, 5 µg of pMT2-E2 expression plasmid, and 0.5 µg of an HPV origin-containing plasmid. A subset of the GFP-11E1 phosphorylation mutations and their corresponding NES mutations (NEm) were tested. The replicated origin-containing plasmid (DpnI+ lanes) was revealed by Southern blotting 48 h posttransfection. The signals of replicated origin DNA were quantified, and their ratios to that of the wild-type GFP-11E1 were then calculated.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The DNA binding domain and the helicase domain of E1 have previously been defined in HPV E1 proteins and in the bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) E1 (Fig. 1A) (3, 10, 47, 67, 70, 76). Although some functionally significant modifications occur near the amino terminus of E1, such as phosphorylation by CDKs, casein kinase II, protein kinase A, or protein kinase C (16, 46, 48, 82), the mechanisms of regulation are not understood. The work described here has now identified a conserved region of 46 amino acids (residues 82 to 127) in the HPV E1 amino-terminal domain as a localization regulatory region (LRR) (Fig. 3A). The LRR contains the NES (residues 96 to 116) and spans the previously identified consensus cyclin binding motif RxL (residues 124 to 126) (46), the three CDK phosphorylation sites (S89, S93, and S107), and a bipartite NLS (residues 83 to 85, KRK, and residues 120 to 125, KKVKRR) (J. H. Yu, W. Deng, B. Y. Lin, T. R. Broker, and L. T. Chow, unpublished results) (Fig. 3A). These sequence elements are highly conserved among E1 proteins of many HPV genotypes, suggesting that there could exist a ubiquitous regulatory mechanism among E1 helicases of HPVs. The functions of this region are consistent with reports that the N-terminal 166 residues of HPV-11 E1 are dispensable for cell-free replication (2).
The E1 nuclear export is mediated by CRM1, and the E1 NES is inactivated by CDK phosphorylation on serine residues within or around the NES. Phosphorylation may have affected the accessibility or affinity of this sequence for CRM1. However, repeated attempts to isolate the E1/CRM1 complex from transfected cells were not successful, suggesting that the interaction is very transient. Interestingly, although the BPV-1 E1 also contains an analogous cyclin binding motif, one CDK phosphorylation site, and a bipartite NLS (16, 39, 40), it does not appear to harbor a consensus leucine-rich NES (Fig. 3A). Thus, BPV-1 E1 protein may have a different mechanism of regulation. For instance, sumoylation has been reported to be critical for the nuclear localization of BPV-1 E1 (60). It is not known whether sumoylation is also important for nuclear localization of the HPV E1 protein.
Three serine residues in the LRR, S89, S93, and S107, are candidate CDK substrates. Our in vivo data show that GFP-11E1 and EE-E1 are substrates of CDK complexes, and phosphorylated E1 can be detected by the antibody MPM-2, which reacts with phospho-S/T-P (Fig. 1B and 2A and B). Of the three Ser residues, S107 is located within the NES and the E1 S107A mutation is most defective in its nuclear localization (Fig. 1C), but it was rescued very effectively by mutations in the NES (see GFP-11E1 S107A-NEm in Fig. 3B). Thus, the primary function of S107 phosphorylation by CDK is to inactivate the NES. In contrast, a small amount of the GFP-11E1 S89A-NEm, S93A-NEm, and S89,93,107A-NEm proteins remained in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3B). These data suggest two possible interpretations that are not mutually exclusive. First, phosphorylation of S89 and S93, in addition to S107, is necessary to inactivate the NES. Second, phosphorylation of S89 and S93 may play an additional role in enhancing the NLS activity. In support of this latter interpretation, in a time course experiment during LMB treatment, E1 S107A accumulated in the nucleus much more quickly than the E1 S89A and E1 S93A did (data not shown). In that case, a cytoplasmic kinase would be responsible for their phosphorylation prior to nuclear import. Once in the nucleus, regardless of the presence or absence of this other kinase, CDK alone would be able to maintain the protein in the phosphorylated states. These hypotheses would explain the nucleocytoplasmic localization of GFP-11E1 RRA mutated in the consensus cyclin binding motif and the corresponding double mutation GFP-11E1 RRA-NEm. Since the E1-RRA protein cannot be phosphorylated by CDKs to inactivate NES (Fig. 2A), the protein was localized to the cytoplasm (Fig. 2A). However, when the NES mutation was also introduced, the nuclear localization was restored (Fig. 3B). Thus, this double mutation is more effectively transported into the nucleus than the phosphorylation site mutations S89A-NEm and S93A-NEm (compare Fig. 1A, 2A, and 3B), consistent with a role of phosphorylation of S89 and S93 by kinases other than CDK in increasing the NLS activity.
We showed that the replication activities achieved by the wild-type or mutant forms of GFP-11E1 proteins correlated with their ability to localize to the nucleus (Fig. 1 to 4), except for E1 proteins that harbor the S107A mutation. Although the nuclear localization of GFP-11E1 S107A and that of GFP-11E1S89,93,107A were effectively or largely restored by the NES mutation, their replication activities remained extremely low relative to those of other NES mutations (Fig. 4). We propose that, in addition to being a CDK substrate to inactivate NES, S107 might be very important structurally for protein conformation and thus very sensitive to any mutations at the site. It is also possible that the S107A mutation may disrupt certain interactions with viral E2 or host proteins. More work will be needed to identify the molecular basis of the defects of the S107A mutation.
The regulation of NLS and NES of the E1 protein by CDK phosphorylation provides a stringent control for E1 nuclear localization. Only when all three sites are phosphorylated can E1 be effectively transported to and retained in the nucleus. Our previous (41, 46) and present data strongly suggest that the responsible kinases include cyclin E/CDK2 or cyclin A/CDK2 (Fig. 2B and C), kinases required for S-phase entry and progression. Recent in vitro experiments have shown that each of the three serine residues at the amino terminus was indeed phosphorylated by cyclin E/CDK2 in vitro (B.-Y. Lin, T. R. Broker, and L. T. Chow, unpublished results). This would explain why, in unsynchronized transfected cells, a small fraction of cells exhibited some cytoplasmic E1 signal (21; this study); these cells might be in G1 phase, with little or no CDK2 activities. We suggest that E1, a potent DNA helicase, which very efficiently unwinds supercoiled DNA to single strands (42), must be tightly regulated in its nucleocytoplasmic localization so that E1 unwinds viral DNA only when all the cellular DNA replication machinery and substrates are available to support viral DNA replication. This interpretation agrees with the observation that E1 does not bind the G1 cyclin D and is not a substrate of cyclin D/CDK4 in vitro (46). Even though we have no direct in vivo data on the mitotic cyclin B/CDK1, it is unlikely that this kinase is involved in phosphorylating E1 to promote its nuclear localization for the reason just discussed.
As an essential component of pre-RC assembly for virus DNA replication, HPV E1 appears to be regulated by CDK complexes in a different manner concerning its subcellular localization compared to the cellular pre-RC components. Instead of being transported to the cytoplasm after a round of replication, as are the phosphorylated forms of human Cdc6 and the yeast MCM complex to prevent reinitiation and endoreduplication, phosphorylation of HPV E1 ensures its nuclear retention as long as the appropriate CDKs are present. These outcomes are consistent with their respective functions. Eukaryotic cells must maintain genetic stability and permit DNA replication once per cell cycle, whereas the virus needs to amplify its genome for progeny production. In conclusion, HPV has provided an excellent example demonstrating how viruses adopt and adapt the host cell mechanisms to promote their own reproductive programs.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Igor Roninson for the p21-9 cells.
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Present address: Human Genetics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa.
Present address: Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
but not replication protein A. J. Virol. 69:2341-2350.[Abstract]
/primase. J. Biol. Chem. 274:2696-2705.-primase p68 subunit. J. Virol. 72:7407-7419.
