Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, December 2004, p. 13865-13870, Vol. 78, No. 24
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13865-13870.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Prototype Foamy Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Leader Peptide Processing Is Mediated by a Furin-Like Cellular Protease, but Cleavage Is Not Essential for Viral Infectivity
Anja Duda,1,
Annett Stange,1,
Daniel Lüftenegger,1
Nicole Stanke,1
Dana Westphal,1
Thomas Pietschmann,2,
Scott W. Eastman,3,
Maxine L. Linial,3
Axel Rethwilm,2 and
Dirk Lindemann1*
Institut für Virologie, Medizinische Fakultät "Carl Gustav Carus," Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,1
Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany,2
Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington3
Received 3 June 2004/
Accepted 26 July 2004

ABSTRACT
Analogous to cellular glycoproteins, viral envelope proteins
contain N-terminal signal sequences responsible for targeting
them to the secretory pathway. The prototype foamy virus (PFV)
envelope (Env) shows a highly unusual biosynthesis. Its precursor
protein has a type III membrane topology with both the N and
C terminus located in the cytoplasm. Coexpression of FV glycoprotein
and interaction of its leader peptide (LP) with the viral capsid
is essential for viral particle budding and egress. Processing
of PFV Env into the particle-associated LP, surface (SU), and
transmembrane (TM) subunits occur posttranslationally during
transport to the cell surface by yet-unidentified cellular proteases.
Here we provide strong evidence that furin itself or a furin-like
protease and not the signal peptidase complex is responsible
for both processing events. N-terminal protein sequencing of
the SU and TM subunits of purified PFV Env-immunoglobulin G
immunoadhesin identified furin consensus sequences upstream
of both cleavage sites. Mutagenesis analysis of two overlapping
furin consensus sequences at the PFV LP/SU cleavage site in
the wild-type protein confirmed the sequencing data and demonstrated
utilization of only the first site. Fully processed SU was almost
completely absent in viral particles of mutants having conserved
arginine residues replaced by alanines in the first furin consensus
sequence, but normal processing was observed upon mutation of
the second motif. Although these mutants displayed a significant
loss in infectivity as a result of reduced particle release,
no correlation to processing inhibition was observed, since
another mutant having normal LP/SU processing had a similar
defect.

INTRODUCTION
Secreted or membrane-anchored glycoproteins contain signal sequences
targeting them to the secretory pathway (reviewed in reference
12). These so-called signal peptides (SP) can be removed co-
or posttranslationally by the cellular membrane-bound signal
peptidase complex (SPC). If not cleaved, they may serve as membrane
anchors for proteins with distinct membrane orientations. In
most cases SP cleavage is thought to occur cotranslationally.
However, for some proteins, in particular retroviral glycoproteins
(e.g., the human immunodeficiency virus type 1), SP cleavage
occurs very late after translation (
7).
Spumaretroviruses, or foamy viruses (FVs), use a replication pathway with features distinctive from orthoretroviruses (reviewed in reference 17). The particle-associated glycoprotein of FV is unique compared to other retroviral envelope proteins because its coexpression is strictly required for the FV particle release process and its function cannot be replaced by heterologous viral glycoproteins (reviewed in reference 9). The FV envelope precursor protein seems to initially have a type III protein configuration with both its N and C terminus located intracytoplasmically (10). During its transport to the cell surface, it is posttranslationally processed by cellular proteases into at least three subunits. The N-terminal signal or leader peptide (LP) has a type II conformation, whereas the C-terminal transmembrane (TM) subunit has a type I conformation. The internal surface (SU) subunit presumably associates with extracellular domains of TM on the luminal side (10, 20). For the FV budding process at least two essential interactions between Env and Gag are required (10, 14). One of these is the contact of the N-terminal cytoplasmic region of the FV Env LP, the so-called budding domain, with the N terminus of the FV Gag protein (10, 20). The LP of prototype FV (PFV) is glycosylated and cleavage products are viral particle associated (10). The type II protein configuration of the PFV LP suggested by previous data (10, 20) has recently been experimentally confirmed for the feline FV (FFV) LP (6). In the present study, we intended to determine the exact LP/SU cleavage site, analyze the requirement of its cleavage for FV particle release and infectivity, and get an idea which cellular protease might be responsible for PFV Env LP/SU cleavage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells.
The human kidney cell line 293T (
4) and the human fibrosarcoma
cell line HT1080 (
16) were cultivated in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and antibiotics.
Expression constructs.
The replication-deficient PFV vector pczDWP001 is a variant of the previously described PFV Gag/Pol and the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-neo fusion protein (EGN)-expressing vector pDL01 (15), having all translation initiation codons of the env open reading frame overlapping the pol open reading frame inactivated by ATG to ACG mutations. Thereby the pol amino acid sequence remained unchanged, but expression of residual Env coding sequences was completely prevented. The glycoprotein expression constructs used in this study are shown schematically in Fig. 1A. The expression construct pczHFVenvEM015 is a variant of the wild-type PFV Env expression construct pczHFVenvEM002 (11), having an additional BsmBI restriction site immediately upstream of the translation start for cloning purposes. The pczHFVenvEM058, -EM077, and -EM078 constructs for expression of PFV Env mutants having the first, second, or third potential N glycosylation site inactivated by a N
Q mutation were described previously (10). The furin cleavage site mutants EM119 to EM123 are based on the pczHFVenvEM015 wild-type construct and were generated by recombinant PCR techniques. The individual cloning strategies and mutagenesis primers are available on request. In constructs pczHFVenvEM119 (R122A), -EM120 (R123A), -EM121 (R126A), and -EM122 (R129A), individual arginine residues within the overlapping minimal furin consensus sequences RXXR or close to it were changed to alanine, whereas in pczHFVenvEM123 (R122A, R123A, R126A, and R129A), all four arginine residues were mutated simultaneously. The PFV Env immunoadhesin construct pAD05 is based on the murine leukemia virus-derived vector pczCFG5IEGZ (3), containing a polylinker upstream of an encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosomal entry site driving a EGFP zeocin (EGZ) fusion protein cassette. The immunoadhesin itself comprises the extracellular domains of the PFV Env (amino acids [aa] 1 to 936) and constant domains (hinge, CH2, and CH3) of mouse immunoglobulin G2a (IgG2a) (Fig. 1B) that were cloned by PCR from BALB/c total spleen mRNA. The amino acid sequence of the chimeric protein at the fusion boundary in single letter amino acid code is N-SALQGIgseprg-C, with PFV Env sequences in upper case and mouse IgG2a (mIgG2a) sequences in lower case.
Generation of viral supernatants and analysis of transduction efficiency.
FV supernatants containing recombinant viral particles were
generated essentially as described previously (
8,
11), by cotransfection
of 293T cells with the Gag/Pol-expressing vector pczDWP001 and
an Env expression plasmid as indicated. Extra- and intracellular
viral particles were harvested as described previously (
10).
Transductions of recombinant EGFP-expressing PFV vector particles
were performed by infection of 2
x 10
4 target cells plated 24
h in advance in 12-well plates for 4 h using 1 ml of viral supernatant
or dilutions thereof. The amount of EGFP-positive cells was
determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis 72
h after infection. All transduction experiments were performed
at least three times, and in each independent experiment the
values obtained with wild-type PFV Env (EM015) were arbitrarily
set to 100.
Antisera and Western blot expression analysis.
Western blot expression analysis of cell- and particle-associated viral proteins was performed essentially as described previously (10). The polyclonal antisera used were specific for PFV Gag (2) or the LP of PFV Env, aa 1 to 86 (10). Furthermore, a hybridoma supernatant (clone P3E10) specific for the SU subunit of PFV Env (S. W. Eastman and M. L. Linial, unpublished data) was employed in some experiments. This antibody recognizes an epitope between aa 170 and 262 in PFV SU (A. Duda and D. Lindemann, unpublished data).
Protein A precipitation and N-terminal protein sequencing.
For N-terminal sequencing of the PFV Env processing products, the pAD05 construct was transfected into 293T cells. Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cell-free supernatant containing the secreted PFV Env immunoadhesin was harvested after pelleting cellular debris by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,700 x g. The protein was subsequently purified from the supernatant by immunoprecipitation using protein A Sepharose either at a small scale (0.5 to 1.0 ml of supernatant) or medium scale (5.0 ml) for Western blot or Coomassie staining, respectively. For N-terminal sequencing, proteins were blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, Coomassie stained for 10 min in 40% methanol, 10% acetic acid, and 0.1% Coomassie blue R250, and subsequently destained in 40% methanol and 10% acetic acid for 3 h. N-terminal protein sequencing was performed at Toplab (Martinsried, Germany).

RESULTS
Reactivity of PFV Env precursor cleavage products with domain-specific antisera.
Potential PFV envelope LP cleavage by the cellular signal peptidase
is predicted to occur after C
86 (
19). However, in previous experiments
we demonstrated that this potential signal peptidase-processing
site is apparently not used, because its inactivation by mutagenesis
had no influence on PFV Env LP processing (
10). In contrast
to that result, mutagenesis of G
148 resulted in almost complete
inhibition of PFV Env LP processing and loss of infectivity
and particle release (
10). Interestingly, this residue of the
PFV Env protein is part of a conserved tetrapeptide motif found
in all known isolates of different FV species, which fits well
the requirements of a signal peptidase cleavage site. This pointed
to a role of this conserved sequence in PFV Env proteolysis
and suggested that this stretch of amino acids may represent
the actual processing site itself. However, the apparent molecular
weight of the PFV Env LP protein backbone of about 14,000 (
10)
was in disagreement with the predicted mass of 17.4 kDa for
a peptide comprising aa 1 to 148 of PFV Env and fitted more
closely to a peptide of about 120 aa in length. Furthermore,
endo H (endo-ß-
N-acetylglucosaminidase H)-resistant
uncleaved PFV Env precursor proteins were detectable in cell
lysates (
10). Therefore, a processing by the endoplasmic reticulum
resident signal peptidase seemed highly unlikely. To localize
the LP processing site in more detail we analyzed viral particle-associated
processing products of wild-type PFV Env and three mutants

N1,

N2, and

N3, inactivating the first (N
25), second (N
109), and
third (N
141) potential N glycosylation sites, respectively,
with respect to their reactivity with antisera specific to subdomains
of the PFV Env protein. From previous analysis (
10) and unpublished
data (D. Lüftenegger and D. Lindemann, unpublished data)
we knew that the PFV Env protein is indeed N glycosylated at
N
109 and N
141, whereas N
25 is inaccessible to N glycosylation,
suggesting that, analogous to the FFV Env LP, the PFV Env LP
has a type II protein configuration and N
25 is located intracytoplasmically.
In agreement with this, the gp130
Env precursor protein in lysates
of 293T cells transfected with the

N1 mutant protein (EM058)
comigrated with that of wild-type PFV Env (EM015) upon Western
blot analysis using either an LP-specific rabbit antiserum raised
against aa 1 to 86 (Fig.
2A, lanes 1 and 2) or a PFV SU-specific
monoclonal antibody (Fig.
2B, lanes 1 and 2). In contrast to
that, the precursor of the

N2 (EM077) and

N3 (EM078) mutants
showed a mobility shift as a result of the missing sugar chains
(Fig.
2A and B, lanes 3 and 4). Intriguingly, probing of the
cell lysates and the corresponding viral particle lysates with
anti-LP revealed a mobility shift of the LP cleavage products
only for the

N2 mutant (EM077) (Fig.
2A, lanes 3 and 8), whereas
the mobility of the cleavage products of the

N1 (EM058) (Fig.
2A, lanes 2 and 7) and

N3 (EM078) (Fig.
2A, lanes 4 and 9) mutants
was unchanged compared to the wild-type protein (EM015) (Fig.
2A, lanes 1 and 6). This indicated that the LP is only glycosylated
at N
109 (N2) and suggested that the third N glycosylation site
at N
141 is already contained in SU. Consistent with this, a
mobility shift of the processed SU in viral particles was observed
only for the

N3 (EM078) mutant (Fig.
2B, lane 9) but not for

N2 (EM077) (Fig.
2B, lane 8) upon probing of the particle lysates
with the anti-SU monoclonal antibody. Thus, our previous observation
that the potential signal peptidase cleavage site at C
86 is
not used was confirmed by these data. Furthermore they demonstrated
N glycosylation of PFV Env LP cleavage products at N
109 and
of the PFV Env gp80
SU domain at N
141. Taken together, these
results indicated that LP/SU cleavage of the precursor protein
must occur somewhere between aa 109 and 141. In addition, the
occurrence of a mobility shift of the particle-associated higher-molecular-weight
LP cleavage products gp28
LP and gp38
LP only upon inactivation
of the N
109 and not by mutation of the N
141 N glycosylation
site suggested that these forms were not generated by alternative
proteolytic processing of the gp130
Env precursor protein. Indeed
we recently discovered that they are derived by posttranslational
modification of gp18
LP (N. Stanke and D. Lindemann, unpublished
data).
N-terminal sequencing of PFV Env processing products.
In order to isolate sufficient amounts of PFV Env processing
products for analysis by Edman degradation, we generated a PFV
Env immunoadhesin (AD05) comprising the extracellular domains
of PFV Env (aa 1 to 936) and the constant domain of the mouse
IgG2a heavy chain (hinge, CH
2, and CH
3 domain) (Fig.
1B). By
Western blot analysis of protein A Sepharose pelleted supernatant
of transfected 293T cells and incubation with various PFV Env-specific
or mouse IgG-specific antisera, reactive bands with molecular
weights of about 150,000, 90,000, and 75,000 were detected (Fig.
3A to C, lane 5). The 150-kDa protein and its deglycosylated
110-kDa form reacted with anti-mouse IgG- (Fig.
3A, lanes 2
and 5) and anti-PFV-SU-specific (Fig.
3C, lanes 2 and 5) antibodies
but not anti-PFV-LP-specific antibodies (Fig.
3B, lanes 2 and
5). The 90-kDa protein and its deglycosylated 52-kDa form were
detected by anti-PFV-SU antibodies (Fig.
3C, lanes 2 and 5)
but not by anti-mouse IgG- (Fig.
3A, lanes 2 and 5) or anti-PFV-LP-specific
(Fig.
3B, lanes 1 and 5) antibodies. Finally, the 75-kDa protein
and its deglycosylated 68-kDa form were stained only by anti-mouse
IgG-specific antibodies (Fig.
3A, lanes 2 and 5). Taken together,
the differential reactivity to the antisera used suggested that
the 150-kDa protein is a SU-TM-IgG processing intermediate having
only the LP cleaved off, the 90-kDa protein is the mature SU
subunit, and the 75-kDa protein is the TM-IgG subunit of the
immunoadhesin. Comigration of native (Fig.
3C, lanes 5 and 6)
or peptide:
N-glycosidase F (PNGase F)-treated (Fig.
3C, lanes
2 and 3) SU subunits of the immunoadhesin and of PFV particles
indicated that N- and C-terminal processing of the SU subunit
of the immunoadhesin is identical to that of PFV Env incorporated
into PFV particles. For N-terminal sequence determination the
immunoadhesin, purified by protein A Sepharose precipitation
of transfected 293T supernatant (Fig.
3D, lane 1), was separated
by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
along with mock-purified control supernatant of cells transfected
with the empty expression vector (Fig.
3D, lane 2). Coomassie
staining revealed proteins of about 150, 90, and 75 kDa specific
for the immunoadhesin (Fig.
3D, lane 1). Proteins of approximately
55 and 28 kDa were stained in protein A precipitates of both
samples (Fig.
3D, lanes 1 and 2) and most probably are bovine
Ig heavy- and light-chain proteins copurified from the fetal
calf serum in the growth medium. N-terminal sequencing of the
immunoadhesin-specific 150-, 90-, and 75-kDa proteins revealed
the amino acid sequences SLRM, SLRMQH, and SVDN, respectively.
Taken together, these data suggested that PFV Env LP/SU cleavage
occurs after R
126 of the gp130
Env precursor protein. Furthermore,
they indicated that the PFV Env SU/TM furin cleavage site predicted
by sequence (
19) and mutagenesis (
1,
15) analysis is indeed
used and the PFV Env SU subunit is processed after R
571. These
two processing events of the precursor protein generate PFV
Env SU and TM subunits with N-terminal amino acid sequences
of SLRMQH and SVDNNY, respectively.
Mutagenesis of LP/SU furin consensus cleavage sites.
Sequence alignment of the regions of other primate, bovine,
equine, and feline FV glycoproteins corresponding to the experimentally
determined PFV Env LP/SU cleavage site revealed the presence
of one to three minimal furin consensus cleavage sites (
18)
in all proteins (Fig.
1C). In PFV Env two furin cleavage sites
overlap each other (Fig.
1C). The N-terminal protein sequence
data of the AD05 immunoadhesin clearly showed that only the
first cleavage site (RIAR) is used. To support the protein sequencing
data and analyze the function of LP/SU cleavage for PFV replication,
R
123, R
126, and R
129 of the two overlapping furin consensus
cleavage sites and R
122 immediately upstream of the first were
mutated individually or all together to alanine (Fig.
1A). The
mutant expression constructs (EM119 to EM123) were cotransfected
with the PFV Gag/Pol and EGFP-Neo marker protein expressing
PFV vector pczDWP001 into 293T cells. Western blot analysis
of the corresponding 293T cell lysates revealed a similar expression
level of all PFV Env proteins, except for R
123A (EM120) showing
a slightly reduced expression (Fig.
4A, lanes 1 to 8). For R
123A
(EM120), R
126A (EM121), and the quadruple mutant (EM123), an
almost complete inhibition of cellular LP/SU cleavage was observed
(Fig.
4A, lanes 5, 6, and 8). The cellular processing of the
R
122A (EM119) and the R
129A (EM122) mutant was slightly reduced
compared to the wild type (EM015) (Fig.
4A, lanes 1, 4, and
7). Infectivity analysis of the respective cell supernatants
or freeze-thaw cell lysates revealed a 10- to 15-fold reduction
for the R
129A mutant (EM122), a 13- to 25-fold reduction for
the quadruple mutant (EM123), and a 20- to 40-fold reduction
for the R
123A (EM120) and R
126A (EM121) mutants (Fig.
4C). The
R
122A mutant (EM119) displayed an infectivity similar to the
wild type (EM015) (Fig.
4C). Western blot analysis of particle
preparations purified from cell culture supernatant revealed
a strongly reduced particle release for all mutants except R
122A
(EM119), evident by the anti-PFV Gag immunostaining (Fig.
4A,
lanes 9 to 16). Analysis using the LP-specific polyclonal rabbit
antiserum or the SU-specific monoclonal antibody revealed upon
prolonged exposure the presence of small amounts of LP-SU protein
fragments in wild-type (EM015) particle preparations in addition
to SU subunit processing products (Fig.
4A and B, lane 9). This
form was more prominent in the R
122A mutant (EM119) but was
the only SU reactive form in particle preparations of R
123A
(EM120), R
126A (EM121), and the quadruple mutant (EM123) (Fig.
4A and B, lanes 12, 13, 14, and 16). In particle preparations
of the R
129A mutant (EM122), no LP-SU and only small amounts
of SU protein fragments were detectable (Fig.
4A and B, lane
15). These data supported the finding of the protein sequencing
data, indicating that only the first potential furin cleavage
site is used. Furthermore, they suggested that mutations around
the cleavage site interfere with particle release and particles
containing only LP-SU subunits seemed to retain at least some
of their infectivity.

DISCUSSION
The FV glycoprotein, in particular the N-terminal cytoplasmic
domain of the LP, has a crucial function in the viral replication
cycle since its interaction with the viral capsid is absolutely
required for the budding and particle release process (
10,
20).
The biosynthesis of the PFV envelope protein is highly unusual
for a glycoprotein. Proteolytic processing of the N-terminal
LP domain, containing the signal sequence targeting the precursor
to the secretory pathway, occurs only after synthesis of the
full-length precursor protein. Previous mutagenesis analysis
implicated the involvement of a conserved tetrapeptide motif
around aa 148 in LP processing, if it is not the cleavage site
itself. We provide here strong experimental evidence that the
cellular signal peptidase complex does not cleave PFV LP/SU
at this position, but instead processing is mediated by furin
or a furin-like protease after aa R
126. N-terminal sequencing
of precursor processing products of a PFV Env immunoadhesin
molecule and the processing analysis of N glycosylation mutants
revealed an LP/SU cleavage site that matches the minimal requirements
of a furin consensus sequence shown in Fig.
1C. In contrast,
the SU/TM cleavage site fits the requirements of an optimal
furin recognition site (
18), as previously predicted and implicated
by mutagenesis analysis (
1,
15,
19). This processing site was
confirmed in this study by N-terminal sequencing of the immunoadhesin
TM-IgG subunit. These results suggest that cleavage at both
processing sites is either mediated by different furin-like
proteases or by the same protease with different efficiencies
at the individual processing sites. In both cases this can serve
a regulatory role. However, an answer to this question requires
the identification of the specific individual protease(s) involved
in PFV Env processing. Interestingly, all known FV isolates
from different species contain at least one, sometimes up to
three, overlapping minimal furin consensus sequences in the
analogous regions of the precursor protein, suggesting that
all of them display a similar LP/SU processing behavior. Indeed
observations on the FFV LP processing provide similar results
and demonstrate an in vitro cleavage of synthetic FFV Env peptides
and recombinant proteins spanning the putative LP/SU cleavage
site by furin (M. Löchelt, personal communication). Highly
sensitive Western blot analysis using a monoclonal antibody
against the PFV Env SU subunit revealed the presence of small
amounts of unprocessed LP-SU subunit intermediates already in
wild-type PFV particles, indicating that complete LP/SU processing
may not be absolutely required for acquisition of infectivity.
Different arginine point mutants in the vicinity of the cleavage
site further support this assumption. Compared to the wild-type
protein, the mutation of R
122 (EM119) for example, lying outside
of the minimal furin cleavage site, already resulted in a substantial
increase in the amount of LP-SU processing intermediates relative
to fully processed SU subunits. Nevertheless this mutant displayed
a particle release behavior and infectivity analogous to that
of wild-type PFV Env. Furthermore, in viral particles of the
single mutants R
123A (EM120) and R
126A (EM121) or the quadruple
mutant (R
122A, R
123A, R
126A, and R
129A) (EM123), only LP-SU
processing intermediates but no fully processed SU subunits
and only low amounts of gp18
LP were detectable, indicating an
almost complete block in LP/SU cleavage. Although these mutants
displayed a significant FV particle release defect and infectivities
measured in supernatants of transfected 293T cells were reduced
10- to 40-fold, their relative infectivities compared to wild-type
PFV Env were in a similar range as for the R
129A (EM122) mutant,
showing a similar reduction in particle release but a normal
LP/SU cleavage pattern in viral particles. Therefore, the reduction
in infectivity in the supernatant of cells transfected with
certain mutants seems to correlate with the particle release
defect of those mutants rather than with the LP/SU processing
defect. Altogether the data on the cleavage site mutagenesis
indicate that LP/SU cleavage in contrast to the essential SU/TM
processing (
1,
15) is not a prerequisite for obtaining infectious
FV particles. Apparently uncleaved LP/SU on the viral particle
still allows receptor interaction and subsequent fusion of viral
and cellular lipid membranes by TM.
In addition, our data suggest that mutation of residues, in particular evolutionarily conserved ones, in the C-terminal domain of LP or the N-terminal domain of SU interfere with PFV particle release (10). This can explain the LP/SU processing defect of the previously characterized G148R (EM084) mutant (10). The processing defect of EM084 can result from an intracellular transport defect, as indicated by a severely impaired particle release. This mutant may, therefore, never reach the intracellular compartment in which the furin-like protease that mediates LP/SU cleavage is localized. Alternatively, it is possible that the conformation of EM084 is altered in such a way that the cleavage site becomes inaccessible for processing by the cellular protease. In summary, the results from this study show that unlike other viral glycoproteins such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp160 (13) or Ebola GP (5) that are processed by cellular furin-like proteases at a single cleavage site in the precursor protein, PFV glycoprotein precursor proteolysis by this type of proteases occurs at two sites, resulting in its unusual final topology and adding another unique feature for a retroviral glycoprotein to PFV Env.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Martin Löchelt for communicating results prior
to publication.
This work was supported by grants from the DFG (Li621/2-1, Li621/2-3) and BMBF (01ZZ0102) to D.L. Work of M.L.L. and S.W.E. was supported by grant CA 18282 from the National Cancer Institute.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dirk Lindemann, Institut für Virologie, Medizinische Fakultät "Carl Gustav Carus," Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany. Phone: 49-351-458-6210. Fax: 49-351-458-6314. E-mail:
dirk.lindemann{at}mailbox.tu-dresden.de.

A.D. and A.S. contributed equally. 
Present address: Hygiene Institut, Abteilung Molekulare Virologie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 
Present address: Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York, N.Y. 

REFERENCES
1 - Bansal, A., K. L. Shaw, B. H. Edwards, P. A. Goepfert, and M. J. Mulligan. 2000. Characterization of the R572T point mutant of a putative cleavage site in human foamy virus Env. J. Virol. 74:2949-2954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Baunach, G., B. Maurer, H. Hahn, M. Kranz, and A. Rethwilm. 1993. Functional analysis of human foamy virus accessory reading frames. J. Virol. 67:5411-5418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Dinev, D., B. W. Jordan, B. Neufeld, J. D. Lee, D. Lindemann, U. R. Rapp, and S. Ludwig. 2001. Extracellular signal regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) is required for the differentiation of muscle cells. EMBO Rep. 2:829-834.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Du Bridge, R. B., P. Tang, H. C. Hsia, P. M. Leong, J. H. Miller, and M. P. Calos. 1987. Analysis of mutation in human cells by using an Epstein-Barr virus shuttle system. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:379-387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Feldmann, H., V. E. Volchkov, V. A. Volchkova, U. Stroher, and H. D. Klenk. 2001. Biosynthesis and role of filoviral glycoproteins. J. Gen. Virol. 82:2839-2848.[Free Full Text]
6 - Geiselhart, V., A. Schwantes, P. Bastone, M. Frech, and M. Löchelt. 2003. Features of the Env leader protein and the N-terminal Gag domain of feline foamy virus important for virus morphogenesis. Virology 310:235-244.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Li, Y., L. Luo, D. Y. Thomas, and C. Y. Kang. 1994. Control of expression, glycosylation, and secretion of HIV-1 gp120 by homologous and heterologous signal sequences. Virology 204:266-278.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Lindemann, D., M. Bock, M. Schweizer, and A. Rethwilm. 1997. Efficient pseudotyping of murine leukemia virus particles with chimeric human foamy virus envelope proteins. J. Virol. 71:4815-4820.[Abstract]
9 - Lindemann, D., and P. A. Goepfert. 2003. The foamy virus envelope glycoproteins. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 277:111-129.[Medline]
10 - Lindemann, D., T. Pietschmann, M. Picard-Maureau, A. Berg, M. Heinkelein, J. Thurow, P. Knaus, H. Zentgraf, and A. Rethwilm. 2001. A particle-associated glycoprotein signal peptide essential for virus maturation and infectivity. J. Virol. 75:5762-5771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Lindemann, D., and A. Rethwilm. 1998. Characterization of a human foamy virus 170-kilodalton Env-Bet fusion protein generated by alternative splicing. J. Virol. 72:4088-4094.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Martoglio, B., and B. Dobberstein. 1998. Signal sequences: more than just greasy peptides. Trends Cell. Biol. 8:410-415.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Moulard, M., and E. Decroly. 2000. Maturation of HIV envelope glycoprotein precursors by cellular endoproteases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1469:121-132.[Medline]
14 - Pietschmann, T., M. Heinkelein, M. Heldmann, H. Zentgraf, A. Rethwilm, and D. Lindemann. 1999. Foamy virus capsids require the cognate envelope protein for particle export. J. Virol. 73:2613-2621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Pietschmann, T., H. Zentgraf, A. Rethwilm, and D. Lindemann. 2000. An evolutionarily conserved positively charged amino acid in the putative membrane-spanning domain of the foamy virus envelope protein controls fusion activity. J. Virol. 74:4474-4482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Rasheed, S., W. A. Nelson-Rees, E. M. Toth, P. Arnstein, and M. B. Gardner. 1974. Characterization of a newly derived human sarcoma cell line (HT-1080). Cancer 33:1027-1033.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Rethwilm, A. 2003. The replication strategy of foamy viruses. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 277:1-26.[Medline]
18 - Thomas, G. 2002. Furin at the cutting edge: from protein traffic to embryogenesis and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 3:753-766.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Wang, G., and M. J. Mulligan. 1999. Comparative sequence analysis and predictions for the envelope glycoproteins of foamy viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 80:245-254.[Abstract]
20 - Wilk, T., V. Geiselhart, M. Frech, S. D. Fuller, R. M. Flügel, and M. Löchelt. 2001. Specific interaction of a novel foamy virus Env leader protein with the N-terminal gag domain. J. Virol. 75:7995-8007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Journal of Virology, December 2004, p. 13865-13870, Vol. 78, No. 24
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.24.13865-13870.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Perkovic, M., Schmidt, S., Marino, D., Russell, R. A., Stauch, B., Hofmann, H., Kopietz, F., Kloke, B.-P., Zielonka, J., Strover, H., Hermle, J., Lindemann, D., Pathak, V. K., Schneider, G., Lochelt, M., Cichutek, K., Munk, C.
(2009). Species-specific Inhibition of APOBEC3C by the Prototype Foamy Virus Protein Bet. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 5819-5826
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stange, A., Luftenegger, D., Reh, J., Weissenhorn, W., Lindemann, D.
(2008). Subviral Particle Release Determinants of Prototype Foamy Virus. J. Virol.
82: 9858-9869
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yap, M. W., Lindemann, D., Stanke, N., Reh, J., Westphal, D., Hanenberg, H., Ohkura, S., Stoye, J. P.
(2008). Restriction of Foamy Viruses by Primate Trim5{alpha}. J. Virol.
82: 5429-5439
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Duda, A., Luftenegger, D., Pietschmann, T., Lindemann, D.
(2006). Characterization of the prototype foamy virus envelope glycoprotein receptor-binding domain.. J. Virol.
80: 8158-8167
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stanke, N., Stange, A., Luftenegger, D., Zentgraf, H., Lindemann, D.
(2005). Ubiquitination of the Prototype Foamy Virus Envelope Glycoprotein Leader Peptide Regulates Subviral Particle Release. J. Virol.
79: 15074-15083
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cartellieri, M., Herchenroder, O., Rudolph, W., Heinkelein, M., Lindemann, D., Zentgraf, H., Rethwilm, A.
(2005). N-Terminal Gag Domain Required for Foamy Virus Particle Assembly and Export. J. Virol.
79: 12464-12476
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Luftenegger, D., Picard-Maureau, M., Stanke, N., Rethwilm, A., Lindemann, D.
(2005). Analysis and Function of Prototype Foamy Virus Envelope N Glycosylation. J. Virol.
79: 7664-7672
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Stange, A., Mannigel, I., Peters, K., Heinkelein, M., Stanke, N., Cartellieri, M., Gottlinger, H., Rethwilm, A., Zentgraf, H., Lindemann, D.
(2005). Characterization of Prototype Foamy Virus Gag Late Assembly Domain Motifs and Their Role in Particle Egress and Infectivity. J. Virol.
79: 5466-5476
[Abstract]
[Full Text]