Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2004, p. 13113-13121, Vol. 78, No. 23
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.23.13113-13121.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Y. Rebecca Chin, and
Marshall S. Horwitz*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
Received 12 May 2004/ Accepted 29 June 2004
|
|
|---|
B and the synthesis of chemokines. To determine the mechanism of inhibition of these pathways by the adenovirus E3 10.4K/14.5K proteins, we have examined the effects of this viral complex on the inhibition of AP-1 and NF-
B activation by TNF and found a reduction in assembly of the TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) signaling complex at the plasma membrane accompanied by downregulation of surface levels of TNFR1. |
|
|---|
Studies in our laboratory investigated the mechanism of adenovirus E3's inhibition of signaling through TNFR1, a proinflammatory receptor that activates both NF-
B and AP-1 as diagrammed in Fig. 1. Proapoptotic or proinflammatory signaling poses a significant threat to the survival of many viral types, which have evolved mechanisms to block or modulate signaling through the TNF receptor. For example, cytomegalovirus (1) and poliovirus (37) encode proteins that eliminate TNFR1 from the cell surface. Protein E6 from human papillomavirus 16 inhibits TNFR1 signaling based on its ability to interact with the receptor (14), and VP4 from rotavirus modulates TNF signaling by modulating TRAF-2 activity, which results in the activation of NF-
B signaling and inhibition of AP-1 signaling to promote viral survival (31). Similarly, inhibitory effects of Ad-E3 proteins on the TNF pathways have also been described (reviewed in (13), implicating both Ad E3-14.7K (18, 22, 23, 54) and the Ad E3-10.4K/14.5K protein complex (9,17) in the inhibition of apoptosis (17, 18, 22, 23), or arachidonic acid release (9, 54) in response to TNF. The antiapoptotic effects of Ad E3- 14.7K may be based on its ability to interact with caspase-8 (7, 29). The anti-TNF mechanism of Ad E3-10.4K/14.5K has not been previously demonstrated, but an initial report failed to detect the internalization of the TNF receptor in murine C15.5 and C127 cells (42).
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. TNF activation of NF- B and AP-1 through TNFR1. Upon ligand binding, TNFR1 trimerizes, leading to signalosome formation and activation of both NF- B and AP-1 transcription factors in parallel. Assembly of TRADD, TRAF-2, and RIP at the receptor is required for recruitment and activation of the IKK complex, which in turn phosphorylates I B- , signaling its polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. The p65/p50 heterodimer NF- B is then able to translocate into the nucleus and bind its nuclear targets (2,6). For AP-1 activation, the assembly of TRADD and TRAF-2 at the receptor upon ligand-induced trimerization results in the recruitment and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases MEKK1, MKK4 or MKK7, and JNK, which phosphorylates and activates nuclear c-Jun of the Jun/Fos heterodimer comprising AP-1. This simplified diagram omits a number of interacting molecules that can affect the activities of the pathways shown.
|
(Ad E3-10.4K) and RID-ß (Ad E3-14.5K). Further work has demonstrated the necessity of a tyrosine sorting motif on RID-ß (21, 35) and a dileucine sorting motif on RID-
(21, 53) in the downregulation of Fas, TRAIL, and epidermal growth factor receptors.
Results of experiments presented in this manuscript show that the RID complex is both necessary and sufficient for modulation of signal transduction through the TNF receptor, and that RID's inhibitory effect extends to the AP-1 pathway in addition to the NF-
B pathway. The successful use of plasmids expressing RID-
and RID-ß proteins in the inhibition of NF-
B activation further supports the idea that RID can inhibit TNF signal transduction in the absence of other viral proteins. Investigation of the recruitment of NF-
B signal transduction factors to the receptor in response to TNF also demonstrated RID's ability to block the association of members of the IKK complex as well as the protein kinase RIP with the TNFR1. Downregulation of surface TNFR1 by RID accompanied this inhibition, demonstrating the mechanism of inhibition of TNFR1-induced signal transduction and chemokine synthesis. The downmodulation of TNFR1 and Fas occurred simultaneously and required similar amounts of virus for the effects on each of these receptors. Inhibition of TNF-induced NF-
B activation coincided with receptor downregulation, indicating that RID's inhibition of signal transduction through the TNF receptor is by elimination of TNFR1 from the cell surface. RID's downregulation of surface TNFR1 and Fas was inhibited by hypertonic medium, indicating that clathrin-mediated endocytosis is probably involved in the mechanism of this effect.
|
|
|---|
Viruses.
Ad/RID and Ad/null are E1- and E3-deleted adenoviral vectors, described in Table 1, and were kind gifts of William S. M. Wold (St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo.). Ad/RID expresses the RID-
and RID-ß open reading frames from the adenovirus type 2 (Ad2)-Ad5 chimera rec700 by alternative splicing of a transcript driven from the cytomegalovirus promoter inserted in the E1 region, and Ad/null is the corresponding negative control, which contains the cytomegalovirus promoter in the E1 region but no open reading frames. Ad-CMV-GFP was constructed in our laboratory, and dl309 was a gift from Thomas Shenk (Princeton University, Princeton, N.J.) (Table 1). All infections were done in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with fetal bovine serum (2 to 10%).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Viruses used in this study
|
Cytokine treatment. Cells were treated with recombinant human TNF (R&D Systems) for indicated amounts of time by adding it directly to medium at final concentrations of 10 or 20 ng/ml, as indicated in the figure legend for each experiment.
Antibodies.
Antibodies used in Western blot analysis were as follows: rabbit anti-I
B-
and ß-tubulin, mouse monoclonal phospho-c-Jun (Ser 63), c-Jun, and mouse monoclonal TNFR1 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies; monoclonal IKK-
antibody was purchased from BD PharMingen; monoclonal IKK-ß and RIP antibodies were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories; rabbit anti-RID-ß antibody was kindly provided by Hans-Gerhard Burgert (University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom).
Goat anti-TNFR1 antibody was purchased from R&D Systems for use in immunoprecipitation. For use in flow cytometry experiments, biotinylated mouse immunoglobulin G2A anti-TNFR1, its corresponding biotinylated isotype control antibody, phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse immunoglobulin G1 anti-Fas antibody, and its corresponding PE-conjugated isotype control were purchased from BD Pharmingen.
Western blot analysis. Cell pellets were frozen in microcentrifuge tubes immediately after cytokine treatment and resuspended in 1x sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) loading buffer (62.5 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.02% bromophenol blue), by vortexing. Samples were boiled for 5 min on a heating block, and briefly centrifuged before resolution by SDS-PAGE on a 10% acrylamide-bisacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad) at 130 V for 1 h. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred to Hybond C (Amersham) membrane at 50 V for 50 min, and blocked for 5 min in 5% nonfat dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). All primary and secondary antibodies were used at a titer of 1:1,000, diluted in blocking solution overnight at 4C in 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS. Membranes were washed three times in PBS and incubated with secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. Membranes were washed again and developed with Western Lightning reagent (Perkin Elmer) or Supersignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce). Blots were stripped with 0.2 N NaOH or Restore Western blot Stripping Buffer (Pierce) prior to reprobing with c-Jun or ß-tubulin antibodies.
Plasmids.
Constructs expressing RID-
(pMT2-RID-
), RID-ß (pMT2-RID-ß), and the corresponding empty vector pMT2 were kindly provided by William S. Wold (St. Louis University School of Medicine). The NF-
B-dependent reporter plasmid pIg
-Luc was kindly provided by Bruce Horwitz (Whitehead Institute at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge), and the thymidine kinase promoter-driven Renilla luciferase reporter control plasmid pRL-Tk was from Promega.
Transfection and luciferase reporter assay.
293 cells (
2 x 105) were seeded on six-well plates. Cells were transfected the following day with 100 ng of NF-
B-dependent luciferase reporter construct (pIg
-Luc), 10 ng of Renilla luciferase reporter construct (pRL-Tk), 400 ng of pMT2-RID-
plus 400 ng of pMT2-RID-ß or 800 ng of empty pMT2, and 10 µl of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Six hours prior to harvest, cells were treated with TNF-
(20 ng/ml) or left untreated. Twenty-four hours posttransfection, cells were harvested and luciferase reporter assays were performed with a luciferase assay kit (Promega) following the manufacturer's protocols, using a Monolight 2010 luminometer (Analytical Luminescence Laboratory). Luciferase activities were normalized on the basis of Renilla luciferase activity.
Flow cytometry. Cells were harvested by scraping into medium and pelleted by centrifugation. Pellets were washed three times in ice-cold 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS, and incubated in FB (2% fetal bovine serum in PBS) for 5 min on ice. Cells were pelleted and resuspended in anti-Fas or anti-TNFR1 antibodies or isotype controls at 0.5 µg/ml, and incubated on ice for 30 min. Cells were washed twice in FB. Cells stained for Fas receptor or its control were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (Tousimis) in PBS. Cells stained for TNFR1 were incubated in streptavidin-PE (Molecular Probes) at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml for 30 min on ice, washed twice in FB, and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (Tousimis) in PBS. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis was performed with either a FACScan or FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson), and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Immunoprecipitation of cell lysates.
HeLa cells (8 x 106) were infected for 18 h with 1,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID or Ad/null. Prior to harvest, cells were treated with TNF-
(20 ng/ml) for 10 min or left untreated. Cell pellets were lysed in 1 ml of lysis buffer (0.1% NP-40, 1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, 1x phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 1x complete proteinase inhibitor cocktail) for 30 min on ice. Lysates were precleared with protein A/G Plus agarose beads (Santa Cruz) for 30 min at 4°C and incubated with 2 µg of monoclonal TNFR1 antibody for 2 h at 4°C, then with 30 µl of protein A/G Plus agarose beads for another 2 h. The beads were washed four times with 1 ml of lysis buffer, and once with PBS. Half of the precipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and the separated proteins were analyzed by Western blot.
|
|
|---|
B and AP-1 activation by TNF.
Inhibition of the NF-
B pathway by RID was previously demonstrated in our laboratory by examining changes at the level of the IKK complex as well as downstream of this step including electrophoretic mobility shift assays on the nuclear components of the NF-
B transcription factors. However, our previous mapping studies utilized selected deletion mutants of the adenovirus E3 region and there were always other E3 proteins present during these experiments. The following studies used recently constructed adenoviruses expressing only RID-
/ß to the exclusion of the other E3 proteins.
In order to determine the upstream target for the inhibition of NF-
B as well as extend the observations of RID's effects to the AP-1 pathway, other steps on both of these signal transduction pathways were assayed. 293 cells were infected for 16 h with the E1- and E3-deleted adenovirus vector reconstituted to express RID from the cytomegalovirus promoter in place of the deleted E1A genes (Ad/RID) or a similar adenovirus vector which did not express any E1 or E3 genes (Ad/null) (Table 1). After treatment with TNF for 15 and 30 min, I
B-
was undetectable in Ad/null-infected cells; however, there was no degradation of I
B-
in Ad/RID-infected cells (Fig. 2A). Degradation of I
B-
, which tethers NF-
B in an inactive state in the cytoplasm, correlates with the activation of NF-
B. Because these infections were done in 293 cells that complement the E1 defect in viral vectors, adenovirus proteins other than those from the deleted E3 region could be expressed to normal levels and potentially could act together with RID-
and -ß.
![]() View larger version (44K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. RID is necessary and sufficient for the inhibition of TNF activation of NF- B and AP-1. (A) 293 cells were infected with 4,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID or Ad/null. At 16 h. postinfection, cells were treated with 20 ng/ml TNF for 15 or 30 min or left untreated prior to harvest. Whole-cell extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against I B- and ß-tubulin. (B) HeLa cells were infected with 1,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID, Ad-CMV-GFP, or mock infected (M). At 16 h. postinfection, cells were treated with 20 ng/ml TNF for 20 min or left untreated prior to harvest. Whole-cell extracts were analyzed as in panel A. (C) Extracts from panel B were analyzed for the presence of activated c-Jun with an antibody against the phosphorylated residue at serine 63. Membranes were then stripped and reprobed for total amounts of c-Jun. (D) HeLa cells were infected with 1,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID, the E3 mutant dl309, which is deficient in RID and 14.7K, or 500 particles/cell of each virus. Cells were treated with TNF and analyzed for activated c-Jun as in panel C, or for degradation of I B- as in panels A and B. The increased amounts of c-Jun in cells infected with dl309 alone or in combination with Ad/RID indicate an E1-dependent increase in c-Jun, which did not affect the interpretation of the results. ß-Tubulin was used as a protein loading control.
|
B-
was degraded in mock-infected or Ad-CMV-GFP-infected cells (E1 and RID deleted), but not in Ad/RID-infected cells. Thus, RID-
and -ß are the only viral proteins necessary for the inhibition of TNF-induced I
B-
degradation. RID was able to inhibit TNF-induced I
B-
degradation also in A549 cells, but this effect was dependent upon a higher dose of virus (data not shown).
RID's effects on TNF activation of the AP-1 pathway were also examined to determine not only the scope of RID's inhibitory capacity, but also to assist in finding the target of RID's block on the TNFR1 signaling pathway. Any inhibition of AP-1 signaling by RID would indicate either a separate target or a common upstream molecule necessary for both NF-
B and AP-1 inhibition. Molecules involved in both pathways, such as TRADD, TRAF-2, or RIP, or the receptor would be candidates for such investigations. Examination of the same extracts in Fig. 2B with an antibody that detects activated c-Jun showed that RID is also sufficient to block the phosphorylation of c-Jun on Ser 63 and subsequent TNF activation of AP-1 (Fig. 2C). These results are consistent with the target of RID's block being at a molecule common to both pathways.
Further data to support this hypothesis were obtained by stimulating the AP-1 pathway independently of NF-
B. For example, the addition of adenovirus E1 genes, which were previously shown to stimulate AP-1 activity through the activation of MEKK1 (41), resulted in the phosphorylation of c-Jun independently of TNF and was not inhibited by RID (Fig. 2D). The experiment was performed in HeLa cells infected with the adenovirus mutant dl309, which is deficient in both RID proteins and 14.7K, but expresses all of the E1 proteins. I
B-
was degraded in response to TNF, and as expected for a virus containing the E1A region, c-Jun was phosphorylated independently of TNF. Coinfection of cells with equivalent amounts of dl309 and Ad/RID resulted in an inhibition of I
B-
degradation by TNF, but no reduction in the TNF-independent phosphorylation of c-Jun. This is consistent with the hypothesis that RID blocks TNFR1 signaling at or above MEKK1 (Fig. 1), most likely at one of the molecules common to the NF-
B and AP-1 pathways.
RID's inhibitory effects on NF-
B-dependent transcription were also demonstrated by luciferase assays with the pIg
-Luc reporter (Fig. 3). Infection of 293 cells with Ad/RID blocked TNF induction of pIg
-Luc, in contrast to cells infected with Ad/null (Fig. 3A). The RID plasmids pMT2-RID-
and pMT2-RID-ß were able to inhibit TNF induction of pIgK-Luc, unequivocably proving that RID does not require any other viral proteins to block NF-
B-dependent transcription. (Fig. 3B).
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. RID is sufficient for the inhibition of TNF activation of the NF- B-dependent reporter construct pIg -Luc. (A) 293 cells were infected for 22 h with 1,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID or Ad/null. Cells were stimulated with TNF (20 ng/ml) or left untreated for 6 h. Luciferase activity was measured and normalized on the basis of Renilla luciferase (RL) activity. (B) 293 cells were transfected with either 400 ng of pMT2-RID- plus 400 ng of pMT2-RID-ß or 800 ng of empty plasmid with 100 ng of pIg -Luc and 10 ng of pRL-Tk; 18 h posttransfection, cells were treated with TNF or left untreated for 6 h. Luciferase activity was measured and normalized on the basis of Renilla luciferase activity.
|
/ß on TNF-induced assembly of the signalosome at the receptor was measured by immunoprecipitation of TNFR1 followed by Western blotting for proteins bound to the receptor. The rapid, sequential assembly of TRADD, TRAF-2, RIP, and the IKK complex at the receptor has been well documented (2, 6). In HeLa cells infected with Ad/RID for 18 h, there was a decrease in the recruitment of IKK-
, IKK-ß, and RIP to TNFR1 in comparison to the Ad/null control (Fig. 4) These results explain our previous findings of a RID-dependent decrease in TNF-induced IKK activity (15). A similar outcome occurred for the recruitment of TRAF-2 to the receptor (data not shown), indicating that RID's block was above TRAF-2, probably at TRADD or the receptor itself.
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. RID inhibits TNFR1 signalosome formation. HeLa cells were infected with 1,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID or Ad/null for 18 h, then treated with 20 ng/ml TNF for 10 min or left untreated. Cells were lysed and extracts were immunoprecipitated with an anti-TNFR1 antibody. Resulting proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against RIP, IKK- , and IKK-ß.
|
signaling was located at or close to the TNF receptor, the amount of TNFR1 in the plasma membrane of the cells used in these experiments was quantified by FACS analysis. In suspension HeLa cells (15), we showed only an approximately 10% reduction of TNFR1. In the murine cell lines CL15.5 and C127, no downregulation of TNFR1 from the cell surface in the presence of RID was observed (42), and this issue was readdressed with the cell lines in which NF-
B signaling by TNF was reduced by RID and a new anti-TNFR1 antibody which detected TNFR1 with a higher sensitivity.
In 293 cells infected with either Ad/RID or Ad/null for 16 h, FACS analysis of cell surface levels of TNFR was performed (Fig. 5A), and demonstrated extensive reduction in cell surface expression of TNFR1 in Ad/RID-infected cells. Ad/RID-infected cells had an average sixfold reduction in geometric mean fluorescence of surface TNFR1, compared to Ad/null-infected cells. Eighty percent of the Ad/RID-infected cells were contained within region M1 (compared to 90% for isotype control), which was considered negative for surface TNFR1 (Fig. 5A). These results corresponded to the inhibition of I
B-
degradation shown in Fig. 2 as well as in assays done on aliquots of cells at the time of FACS analysis. These data provide compelling evidence for the reduction of TNFR1 as the target for RID's inhibition of TNF activation of NF-
B and AP-1. Identical results were also demonstrated with monolayer HeLa cells (Fig. 5B).
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Flow cytometry analysis of surface TNFR1 in 293 and HeLa cells. 293 (A) or HeLa (B) cells were infected in triplicate with 4,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID, Ad/null, or mock infected, and stained for surface TNFR at 16 h (A) or 18 h (B) postinfection. Plots of surface TNFR1 fluorescence of representative samples are shown.
|
B-
degradation by TNF (Fig. 6C). Extensive downregulation of TNFR1 (Fig. 6D) and Fas (Fig. 6E) was observed by 12 h postinfection. Consistent with the downregulation of surface TNFR1, Ad/RID-infected cells were also resistant to TNF-induced I
B-
degradation (Fig. 6F). These results indicate that the inhibition of NF-
B activation by RID is dependent upon the downregulation of the receptor, and that downregulation of TNFR1 and Fas from the surface is concurrent.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Kinetics of downregulation of receptors and inhibition of TNF-induced degradation of I B- . 293 cells were infected with 4,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID or Ad/null virus. At 8 or 12 h postinfection, surface levels of TNFR1 (A, D) or Fas (B, E) were measured by flow cytometry as in Fig. 5. Cells infected in parallel with Ad/RID or Ad/null were treated for 30 min with TNF (10 ng/ml) or left untreated. Cells were harvested at 8 h (C) or 12 h (F) postinfection and analyzed for I B- levels by Western blot.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Multiplicity of infection requirements for RID's downregulation of receptors. 293 cells were infected with various amounts of Ad/RID (3, 10, 30, or 100 PFU/cell) or 30 PFU/cell of Ad/null. Cells were analyzed for surface levels of TNFR1 or Fas, and the resulting geometric mean fluorescence intensities were plotted as percentages of geometric mean fluorescence obtained from Ad/null-infected cells (Ad/null fluorescence = 100, isotype control fluorescence = 0).
|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Total amounts of TNFR1 and Fas are reduced in the presence of RID. 293 cells were infected with increasing amounts of Ad/RID or Ad/null (100, 500, or 1,000 particles/cell) or mock infected. Cells were harvested at 20 h postinfection. Whole-cell extracts were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against TNFR1, Fas, and RID-ß. ß-Tubulin was analyzed as a protein loading control.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Hypertonic sucrose inhibition of RID-induced receptor downregulation. For either Fas or TNFR1 staining, 293 cells were infected in duplicate with 4,000 particles/cell of Ad/RID or Ad/null. At 4 h postinfection, medium for one well of Ad/RID or Ad/Null-infected cells was changed to Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum containing 0.5 M sucrose. Sixteen hours postinfection, cells were harvested and surface levels of Fas (A) and TNFR1 (B) were determined by FACS. Fas staining of sucrose-treated Ad/null-infected cells was identical to that of sucrose-treated Ad/RID-infected cells (data not shown).
|
|
|
|---|
B and AP-1 pathway and a previous report indicated that TNFR1 was not downregulated at the surface of other cell lines, such as C15.5 and C127 murine cells (42), we began a systematic search for the step on these signal transduction pathways that might be affected by the Ad RID complex. Data presented in this manuscript demonstrate that the adenovirus type 5 RID complex is sufficient for inhibition of TNFR1 signaling in two human cell lines, as shown by RID's ability to block key processes in NF-
B and AP-1 activation, such as the degradation of I
B-
and the phosphorylation of c-Jun, respectively.
Consistent with the inhibition of the NF-
B pathway by RID at the IKK step, results of luciferase assays showed that this block also affected NF-
B activation at the promoter level. Also, RID's ability to inhibit the assembly of the TNFR1 signalosome at the receptor was demonstrated. We reexamined TNFR1 levels in 293 and monolayer HeLa cells. Similar to data presented for Fas and epidermal growth factor receptor, RID also was shown to be sufficient for the downregulation of TNFR1 from the cell surface. Although the reduction of TRAIL receptor at the cell surface may require a third adenovirus E3 protein (adenovirus E3 6.7K) (3), our data indicate that only RID-
plus RID-ß are needed for the reduction of TNFR1.
Kinetic studies showed that reduction of surface TNFR1 and Fas by RID occurs concurrently, and that RID's inhibition of NF-
B activation by TNF coincides with an extensive downregulation of TNFR1. Varying the multiplicity of infection of Ad/RID demonstrated dose-dependent reductions of surface and total TNFR1 and Fas. At each multiplicity, the amount of reduction of surface TNFR1 or Fas was nearly identical. However, the dose-dependent degradation of total amounts of TNFR1 was incomplete, unlike the reduction of Fas to undetectable levels. This may be the result of RID's inability to affect the TNFR1 population sequestered in the Golgi (28). Elimination of Fas and TNFR1 from the cell surface by RID was blocked in the presence of hypertonic medium, a known inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (19, 20), indicating that RID probably internalizes TNFR1 through a clathrin-mediated mechanism similar to that of Fas, epidermal growth factor, and TRAIL receptors (21, 35). However, there are differences between the restoration of TNFR1 and Fas on the cell surface in the presence of sucrose, which suggest that there may be an additional mechanism of decreasing TNFR1 on the plasma membrane. In addition, it has also been reported that hypertonic sucrose can inhibit clathrin- and caveolin-independent endocytosis (39); thus, further dissection of cellular pathways involved in the internalization of TNFR1 by RID must be done to determine exactly which cellular processes are involved in RID-dependent endocytosis of TNFR1.
Uncovering the mechanism of action of individual E3 proteins is an important step in the development and use of E3 proteins as tissue-specific therapeutic agents in the inhibition of the host immune response in tissue transplants or autoimmune conditions (10, 11, 49; reviewed in 25). Understanding the immunomodulatory mechanisms employed by adenoviruses might also be helpful in developing antiviral therapies to combat fatal adenovirus infections in immunosuppressed patients, such as those following organ transplants (30). To these ends, interactions of other Ad E3 proteins, such as the antiapoptotic Ad E3-14.7K, with cellular proteins have been examined (reviewed in 13). For example, in our laboratory, four Ad E3-14.7K-interacting proteins (14.7-interacting proteins, FIP 1 to 4) that were novel at the time of their isolation were identified. FIP-3 (34) was shown to be identical to the third subunit of the IKK complex, IKK-
/NEMO/IKKAP (36, 40, 52). Although expression of 14.7K was shown to reverse cell death induced by FIP-3 overexpression, this interaction did not result in the inhibition of NF-
B activation by TNF (15) or the inhibition of chemokine synthesis induced by TNF or lipopolysaccharide (32). The significance of the IKK-
-Ad E3-14.7K interaction, although potentially fascinating, has yet to be determined.
Identification of cellular proteins that interact with RID-
/ß have thus far identified complex formation between not only epidermal growth factor receptor and RID-
(8) but also an association between RID proteins and the adaptor proteins involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis (21). These data complement the mutagenesis data demonstrating the requirement of the dileucine sorting motif on RID-
and the tyrosine sorting motif on RID-ß for the reduction of cell surface Fas (21, 35), as well as data demonstrating the use of lysosomotropic agents in the inhibition of Fas degradation (12, 44). Similar studies are in progress in the study of RID's effects on TNFR1.
Present address: Department of Pathology, Tufts University, Sackler School of Biomedical Sciences, Boston, Mass. ![]()
|
|
|---|
B activation by the adenovirus E3-10.4/14.5K complex. J. Virol. 76:5515-5521.
B kinase (IKK)-associated protein 1, a common component of the heterogeneous IKK complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1526-1538.
B kinase complex essential for NF-
B activation. Cell 93:1231-1240.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»