Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, November 2004, p. 12386-12394, Vol. 78, No. 22
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.22.12386-12394.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Cell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and Graduate Program in Cell Biology and Genetics, Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Cornell University, New York, New York
Received 17 May 2004/ Accepted 22 July 2004
|
|
|---|
BalD25S, a noninfectious lentiviral vector. Gag-expressing cells exhibited higher levels of activated mitogen-activated protein kinase for longer times after EGF addition than did cells that did not express HIV-1 Gag. These results indicate that HIV-1 Gag can impinge upon the functioning of the cellular vacuolar protein sorting pathway and reveal yet another facet of the intricate effects of HIV-1 infection on host cell physiology. |
|
|---|
It has been postulated that HIV-1 Gag may have evolved to mimic Hrs, a cellular protein that uses a PSAP motif to recruit TSG101 to endosomal membranes (2, 17). Gag has a sevenfold-higher affinity for TSG101 than Hrs does and can effectively compete with Hrs for TSG101 binding in vitro (22). Given these observations, we asked whether HIV-1 Gag and Hrs compete for TSG101/ESCRT proteins in vivo. Specifically, does the overexpression of HIV-1 Gag, which may be physiologically relevant during a productive HIV-1 infection, antagonize TSG101 recruitment by the endosomal machinery, resulting in inefficient cell surface receptor downregulation?
To address this question, we monitored the ligand-induced downregulation of the EGF receptor (EGFR), a cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase whose trafficking through the endocytic pathway has been well characterized (24, 34). The binding of EGF to EGFR results in receptor dimerization and phosphorylation, followed by the activation of a signaling cascade involving multiple mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases. The timely downregulation of this signaling is essential to avoid perturbations in cell physiology. EGFR downregulation is achieved through the internalization of activated receptors by clathrin-dependent endocytosis, the delivery of receptors into the lumens of MVBs, and their subsequent lysosomal degradation. The overexpression or depletion of Hrs or TSG101 results in an attenuated degradation of EGFR, indicating that this process, like HIV-1 egress, is dependent on the function of intact ESCRT complexes (1, 3, 11, 28). EGF-induced EGFR downregulation is therefore a good model system for studying the potential antagonistic effect of HIV-1 Gag expression on the cellular vacuolar sorting pathway. Here we show that the expression of HIV-1 Gag decreases the rate of EGFR downregulation. The increased intracellular retention of EGFR results in prolonged EGFR-mediated signaling, as evidenced by the hyperactivation of ERK/MAP kinase.
|
|
|---|
DNA plasmids.
The Rev-independent Gag expression vectors pCMV5 Gag and pGag-GFP have been discussed elsewhere (14, 27). pHXB2
BalD25S is a lentiviral vector expressing HIV-1 Gag, Env, Rev, Tat, Vif, Vpu, Vpr, and truncated Nef (35). pEGFP-TSG101 (full length) was a kind gift from Stanley Cohen, Stanford University. EGFR-CFP was a kind gift from Larry Samelson, National Institutes of Helath. Point mutations within the Gag sequence were generated by PCR and were verified by DNA sequencing.
Cell culture and transfections. COS-1 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)-10% fetal bovine serum. For transfections, COS-1 cells were seeded to an approximately 50% density and transfected the next day with 6 to 12 µg of plasmid DNA by the use of Lipofectamine 2000 (Gibco BRL Life Technologies, Carlsbad, Calif.). HeLa cells were maintained in DMEM-10% fetal bovine serum and transfected via a calcium phosphate-based protocol.
Internalization and degradation of 125I-EGF.
An assay of the internalization and degradation of 125I-EGF was performed as described by Tebar et al. (26). Briefly, COS-1 cells cultured in 35-mm-diameter dishes were incubated with 125I-EGF (
20 ng/ml) in DMEM-3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at 37°C for 0 to 15 min. At each time point, the medium was aspirated and the cells were washed two times in cold DMEM-3% BSA followed by a 5-min cold acid wash (0.2 M acetic acid, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 2.8) to remove unbound and surface-bound EGF, respectively. The cells were lysed with 1 N NaOH to measure the internalized 125I-EGF. An aliquot of each lysate was used to determine the total amount of protein. The internalized radioactivity (minus nonspecific binding in the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of cold EGF) per unit of total protein was plotted against time. For measurements of 125I-EGF degradation, cells cultured in 35-mm-diameter dishes were incubated with 20 ng of 125I-EGF/ml for 10 min at 37°C and then washed in cold DMEM-3% BSA. Surface-bound EGF was removed by a 2.5-min acid wash (0.2 M sodium acetate, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 4.5) at 0°C. The cells were then incubated in fresh medium containing a 100-fold molar excess of cold EGF (to prevent reinternalization of the recycled EGF) at 37°C for 5 to 120 min. At each time point, the medium was collected, and intact 125I-EGF was precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The cells were solubilized with 1 N NaOH. The degraded fraction was calculated as the ratio of TCA-soluble counts per minute (cpm) at each time point to the total cpm internalized in 10 min.
Immunofluorescence microscopy. Transfected COS-1 cells grown on coverslips were starved of serum for 16 h and then processed at 48 h posttransfection as follows (14). The cells were treated with 20 ng of EGF/ml for 10 min at 37°C, washed with acid (pH 4.5) for 2.5 min at 4°C, washed with cold PBS (twice, for 5 min each time), and reincubated in serum-free DMEM for 0 to 3 h at 37°C. After fixation and permeabilization, the cells were incubated with a 1:250 dilution of human anti-HIV-1 serum and/or a 1:500 dilution of an anti-phosphoEGFR, anti-EEA1, or anti-CD63 antibody in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 90 min. After four 5-min washes with PBS, the cells were incubated with a Cy5-conjugated anti-human antibody, an Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-goat antibody and/or an Alexa Fluor 633-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, Oreg.) for 45 min. The cells were then washed four times for 5 min each with PBS and were mounted on microscope slides. For nuclear staining, Hoechst dye was added to the cells during the first PBS wash after the secondary antibody incubation. Enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence was visualized directly. Laser scanning confocal microscopy was performed with a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope equipped with an Axiovert 100 M inverted microscope using a 63x, 1.2-numerical-aperture (NA) water immersion lens for imaging, as previously described (14). Colocalization and absolute fluorescence intensities were measured on a pixel-by-pixel basis with MetaMorph software (Universal Imaging Corp., Downingtown, Pa.).
EGFR signaling. Transfected COS-1 or HeLa cells grown on 60-mm-diameter dishes were starved of serum for 16 h. The cells were then treated with 20 ng of EGF/ml for 10 min at 37°C, followed by a 2.5-min cold acid wash (pH 4.5) and two 5-min PBS washes. The cells were reincubated in serum-free DMEM for 0 to 190 min. At each time point, cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 50 mM Tris [pH 8.0]) containing leupeptin (10 µg/ml), aprotinin (10 µg/ml), 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzene sulfonyl fluoride (0.25 mg/ml), NaF (1 mM), and Na3VO4 (0.5 mM). The lysates were clarified at 14,000 rpm in an Eppendorf centrifuge for 10 min at 4°C. Western blotting was performed with the indicated antibodies. Proteins were detected by the use of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and ECL Western blotting detection reagents according to the manufacturer's instructions. Western blots were quantified with MacBas, version 2.0, software.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Internalization and degradation of 125I-EGF. (A) Amounts of 125I-EGF internalized over the indicated time course by COS-1 cells transfected with HIV-1 Gag (closed squares) or the empty pCMV5 vector (open squares). Data shown are means ± standard deviations (SD) of duplicates from a representative experiment; the experiment was repeated three times with identical results. (B) Fraction of internalized 125I-EGF degraded over the indicated time course by cells transfected with HIV-1 Gag (closed squares) or empty pCMV5 vector (open squares). The rate of degradation was determined as the slope of the line derived from a linear curve fitting analysis. The graph represents data from one of three independent experiments performed in duplicate.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Single-cell quantitative analysis of phospho-EGFR degradation. (A) COS-1 cells were transfected with GFP or TSG101-GFP, starved of serum, and allowed to internalize EGF for 10 min. The cells were then washed, reincubated with fresh medium for various times, and analyzed for GFP fluorescence (green) or endogenous phospho-EGFR (red). The percentages of GFP-positive cells in classes 1 to 4 at the 180-min time point are shown immediately below the corresponding panels (for GFP, n = 52; for TSG101-GFP, n = 75). Blue represents nuclear staining. (B) Classification scheme based on numbers of pEGFR punctae per cell. Blue represents nuclear staining and red represents pEGFR.
|
![]() ![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Phospho-EGFR degradation in HIV-1 Gag-expressing cells. (A) COS-1 cells transfected with wild-type and mutant forms of Gag-GFP were treated with EGF and analyzed for the number of pEGFR punctae remaining at 180 min, as described in the legend to Fig. 2. Blue represents nuclear staining. The distribution of GFP-positive cells among the four classes is depicted graphically on the right (for Gag-GFP, n = 77; for LTAL Gag-GFP, n = 57; for G2A Gag-GFP, n = 74; for G2A LTAL Gag-GFP, n = 63). (B) Summary of the data for GFP (black)-, Gag-GFP (gray)-, and TSG101-GFP (white)-positive cells in each class at the 180-min time point. (C) GFP (Gag) and Alexa 594 (pEGFR) fluorescence intensities in the individual cells shown in panel A were quantitated by Metamorph analysis and then plotted (au, arbitrary units; n = 50). (D) COS-1 cells transfected with 1.5 pmol of plasmid DNA (6 µg of pCMV5-Gag or 12 µg of pHXB2 Bal D25S) were lysed at 48 h posttransfection. The lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting to detect HIV-1 Gag. (E) COS-1 cells transfected with pHXB2 BalD25S were treated with EGF and analyzed for the number of pEGFR punctae remaining after a 180-min chase, as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The distribution of transfected cells among the four classes is shown (for GFP, n = 52; for pHXB2, n = 53).
|
Identification of subcellular localization of pEGFR at 180 min. The subcellular localization of the pEGFR punctae observed at 180 min was determined for TSG101-GFP- and Gag-GFP-expressing cells. Cells were treated as described above for Fig. 2 and then were fixed and costained for pEGFR and either EEA1, a marker for early endosomes, or CD63, an MVB-late endosome marker protein. pEGFR colocalized partially with EEA1 and mostly with CD63 in both TSG101- and Gag-expressing cells (Fig. 4), implying that the receptor was primarily present in late endosomal compartments (MVBs) by this time. Notably, there was no marked clustering of EEA1- or CD63-positive compartments in Gag-expressing cells. This was in contrast to the prominent clustering of endosomal compartments observed when cellular levels of Hrs and TSG101 are perturbed (2, 11).
![]() ![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Subcellular localization of phospho-EGFR at 180 min. (A) COS-1 cells transfected with GFP, TSG101-GFP, or Gag-GFP were treated with EGF as described in the legend to Fig. 2 and then analyzed for GFP fluorescence, the indicated endosomal markers (blue), and endogenous pEGFR (red). Colocalization between endosomal markers and pEGFR is visible as purple staining. Notably, both pEGFR and CD63 localized to perinuclear regions of the cell. (B) Quantitation of colocalization of pEGFR with EEA1 (left) and CD63 (right) in TSG101- or Gag-expressing cells, determined as the % pEGFR (red) pixels that overlapped with EEA1 or CD63 (blue) pixels. Confocal images of 27 to 38 cells were analyzed for each condition. The means and SD are depicted.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Downregulation of EGFR signaling. (A) COS-1 cells coexpressing EGFR-CFP and Gag, TSG101, or empty vector were lysed at various times after EGF treatment and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with anti-pERK1/2 and anti-ERK monoclonal antibodies. The expression of TSG101 and Gag in each sample was verified by Western blotting with anti-TSG101 and anti-p24 antibodies, respectively. (B) Quantification of the Western blots shown in panel A. Empty vector, open squares; Gag, closed squares; TSG101, open circles. (C) HeLa cells coexpressing EGFR-CFP and wt Gag, PTAP mutant Gag (LTAL), or empty vector were lysed and analyzed for pERK1/2, ERK, and Gag expression as described for panel A. (D) Quantification of the Western blots shown in panel C. Data represent the averages from duplicate experiments. Empty vector, open squares; wt Gag, closed squares; Gag LTAL, closed circles. For each experiment, Western blots were developed with multiple exposure times. Quantitation was performed for images within the linear range of the film.
|
BalD25S is a lentiviral vector that encodes HIV-1 Gag, Env, Tat, Rev, Vif, Vpu, Vpr, and truncated Nef and that uses the HIV-1 LTR as a promoter to drive the expression of these viral proteins. As shown in Fig. 3D, equivalent amounts of HIV-1 Gag protein were expressed from the two constructs.
In order to test whether the HIV-1 Gag-mediated inhibition of EGFR degradation also occurs in the presence of other viral proteins, we transfected COS-1 cells with pHXB2
BalD25S and repeated the experimental procedures described above for Fig. 2. Transfected cells were identified by staining with a human anti-HIV antiserum and Cy5-conjugated anti-human antibodies. The transfected cells were grouped into classes based on the number of pEGFR punctae remaining after a 180-min chase. As shown in Fig. 3E, only 35% of the pHXB2-expressing cells were assigned to class 1. The general distribution of the pHXB2-expressing cells among the four classes was reminiscent of the distribution of wt Gag-GFP- and TSG101-GFP-expressing cells (Fig. 3B). This observation indicates that in a system that resembles HIV-1-infected cells, EGFR degradation is attenuated.
|
|
|---|
COS-1 cells were used in this study as a model system for the demonstration of proof of principle. Although COS-1 cells are not authentic targets of HIV-1 infection, they exhibit three important features that were relevant for this study. First, these cells are permissive for HIV-1 assembly and particle production. Second, COS-1 cells express abundant levels of endogenous EGFR. Third, the envelope-mediated cell death and cell fusion that are induced by HIV-1 infection of target cells do not occur in Gag-expressing COS-1 cells. We were therefore able to demonstrate a correlation between the amount of HIV-1 Gag expressed and the amount of endogenous EGFR remaining after EGF stimulation on a single-cell level. As depicted in Fig. 3C, there was a positive correlation between Gag and EGFR fluorescence intensities over a seven- to eightfold range of Gag expression levels.
Although it is now known that approximately 5,000 Gag molecules are packaged per immature HIV-1 virion (4), the amount of cellular Gag that is expressed on a per-cell basis in an HIV-1-infected cell has not been reported. It is likely that Gag expression levels vary considerably during the course of the infection. However, two lines of evidence suggest that our findings with Gag-transfected COS-1 cells may be applicable to the situation that occurs in HIV-1-infected cells. First, equivalent amounts of Gag protein were produced when expression was driven from a heterologous promoter (CMV) or from the HIV-1 LTR (pHXB2
BalD25S) (Fig. 3D). Second, the pattern of pEGFR staining in cells transfected with pHXB2
BalD25S was similar to that observed for cells transfected with pCMV5 Gag-GFP (Fig. 3E). Thus, we hypothesize that it is possible for the HIV-1 LTR to produce the levels of Gag expression that are needed to attenuate EGFR downregulation.
The scenario during an actual HIV-1 infection, however, may be much more complicated. The presence of other viral proteins may serve to either further enhance or mask Gag-mediated effects on receptor trafficking and signaling (23). It would therefore be interesting to further investigate whether the ESCRT-dependent endosomal sorting of receptors is perturbed in HIV-1-infected target cells, e.g., T cells. A potential candidate receptor in the T cell is CXCR4, which has been shown to be dependent on ESCRT components for downregulation (18).
Interestingly, the effect of HIV-1 Gag overexpression on receptor downregulation was not as strong as one would expect if the virus completely usurped the cellular machinery and redirected it towards sites of viral egress. This is emphasized by the lack of clustering of endosomal compartments that are normally observed when the cellular levels of VPS components are perturbed. There are three potential explanations for this observation. (i) HIV-1 Gag induces an increased expression of ESCRT proteins to accommodate its needs. This possibility is unlikely, since no differences in endogenous TSG101 protein levels were observed for HIV-1 Gag-transfected versus untransfected cells (not shown). (ii) The cellular TSG101/ESCRT pool is too large to be completely depleted by the overexpression of Gag/PTAP-containing proteins. (iii) The stoichiometry of the Gag-ESCRT interaction is not 1:1. The number of ESCRT complexes that are recruited per Gag assembly unit in vivo is not known. The multimerization of Gag into assembly complexes, which consist of
5,000 Gag molecules, could physically restrict its ability to sequester large, 350-kDa ESCRT complexes.
An obvious consequence of altered receptor trafficking is altered intracellular signaling. As depicted in Fig. 5, cells expressing HIV-1 Gag exhibited increased EGFR-mediated signaling, as evidenced by hyperactivation of the ERK/MAP kinase pathway. This finding is consistent with the presence of increased amounts of pEGFR in endosomal compartments 180 min after the addition of EGF. The ability of endosomal EGFR to induce intracellular signaling has been documented (31). Changes in intracellular signaling are a well-established characteristic of HIV-1 pathogenesis. The binding of HIV-1 gp120 to CD4 and a chemokine receptor (CXCR4 or CCR5) during virus entry triggers a plethora of signaling pathways (21). The upregulation of cellular signaling regulates the ability of the virus to replicate efficiently within the target cell (21). After provirus integration into the host genome, either a productive or a latent infection can be established. The switch from a latent to productive infection has been shown to be triggered and maintained by extracellular mitogen/agonist-induced MAP kinase activation through the Ras/Raf/Mek signaling pathway (32). MAP kinase stimulates AP-1, which, along with NF-
B, transactivates the HIV-1 LTR (32). The activation of MAP kinase also increases the infectivity of the HIV-1 virions that are subsequently produced (33). The observations presented in this study strongly suggest that Gag-mediated budding and egress during the late stages of the viral life cycle may indirectly contribute to enhanced HIV-1 replication and/or infectivity by slowing down mitogen-induced cell surface receptor downregulation.
This work was supported by NIH grant CA 72309.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»