Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, November 2004, p. 11686-11695, Vol. 78, No. 21
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.21.11686-11695.2004
Hidekatsu Iha,1,
Venkat R. K. Yedavalli,1
Akiko Miyazato,1
Yan Li,1
Kerstin Haller,1
Monsef Benkirane,2 and
Kuan-Teh Jeang1*
Molecular Virology Section, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland,1 CNRS UPR1142, Laboratoire de Virologie Moléculaire, Institut de Génétique Humaine, Montpellier, France2
Received 15 April 2004/ Accepted 24 June 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, findings have emerged that posttranscriptional modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation are prominently involved in regulating the activity of many transcription factors (10, 20, 29, 30, 37, 46, 47, 55, 60, 63). Several mechanistic roles have been proposed for ubiquitination. Ubiquitin regulates the degradation of proteins like p53 with short half-lives (19, 32, 46). Hence, polyubiquitinated p53 has been found to be rapidly degraded by a multisubunit ATP-dependent protease called the 26S proteasome (19). Interestingly, a second role for ubiquitination has been proposed recently (2, 55) in which ubiquitination does not serve to target proteins for proteasomal degradation. Salghetti and colleagues suggested that the polyconjugation of ubiquitin to some transcription factors positively regulates their transcriptional activity (55). Thus, for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein, it was found that the addition of a single ubiquitin molecule to its C terminus serves to increase transcriptional function (2).
The finding that ubiquitination of some factors can increase their transcriptional activity in a degradation-independent manner suggests the possibility that the same signal might also decrease the activity of other transcription factors. For HTLV-1, a provocative observation is that the viral oncoprotein Tax serves an important role for the initial transformation of T cells (54, 59, 67), but long-term adult T-cell leukemia cells are paradoxically lost for Tax expression (35, 45, 58). Accordingly, one thought is that constitutive and permanent expression of active Tax may not be propitious for maintaining cellular viability and/or cellular transformation. Indeed, findings from ex vivo tissue culture illustrate that Tax expression can rapidly engender severe cellular DNA damage, and continuous Tax function can be toxic to cells (3, 12, 18, 33, 39, 41-43, 51, 52). Considered thus, it would seem advantageous for the cell to evolve a mechanism which can rapidly and perhaps reversibly regulate excessive cellular protein function which may no longer be needed. Such a regulatory mechanism might have been adapted to modulate the Tax function of an invading virus.
We examined here whether HTLV-1 Tax is ubiquitinated and whether such modification regulates its function. We found that Tax is predominantly monoubiquitinated and that monoubiquitination of Tax downregulates its transcriptional function through a proteasome-independent mechanism. Our results are consistent with similar observations of Tax ubiquitination from Pique and colleagues (4).
|
|
|---|
B-luc, pHA-ubiquitin, pMyc-ubiquitin, and pHis-ubiquitin were described previously (2, 23). HA-SUMO was kindly provided by Anne Dejean and Ronald A. DePinho. The Tax protein was detected with an anti-Tax rabbit antibody (26) or mouse monoclonal anti-Tax antibody (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program). Tubulin was detected with mouse antitubulin from Sigma (clone DM 1A, T-9026). Plasmid constructs. The pCMV Tax-ubiquitin fusion protein was constructed as follows. First, Tax sequence was PCR amplified with primer 1 (5') (5'-GAATTCAAGCTTGCCACCATGGCCCACTT CCCAGGGTTTGG-3'), primer 1a (3') (5'-GGGGAATTCGACTTCTGTTTCGCGGAAATGTTTTTC-3'), and primer 1b (3') (5'-CCAGTCGAATTCCTACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCGACTTCTGTTTCGCGGAAATGTTTTTCTCT-3'). PCR fragments were cloned into the HindIII and EcoRI sites of the pcDNA3.0 expression vector. Two products were obtained, pCMV-Tax-Flag and pCMV-Tax-noTer (which contained an EcoRI site instead of a termination codon). The ubiquitin sequence containing a Flag sequence (italic in 3' primer 2) was PCR amplified with the human ubiquitin cDNA template (Sigma U-5007) and a 5' primer 2 containing the EcoRI restriction site and a 3' primer 2 in which the two carboxy-terminal glycine residues of ubiquitin were changed to alanine to prevent removal of the ubiquitin moiety by isopeptidases (32). Primer 2 (5') was 5'-GGGGAATTCCAAATCTTCGTGAAAACCCTTACT-3', and primer 2 (3') was 5'-CCCTCTAGATTACTACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCCTTGTCATCGTC GTCCTTGTAGTCAGCAGCTCTCAGACGCAGGACCAAGTGCAGAGTGG-3'. After restriction with EcoRI and XbaI, the ubiquitin fragment was ligated to the C-terminal extremity of pCMV-Tax-noTer to create pCMV-Tax-ubiquitin.
The antisense ubiquitin vector antisense-Ha-ubiquitin was constructed by PCR amplification of a ubiquitin sequence (Sigma U-5007) with primer 2 (5') (5'-GGGGAATTCCAAATCTTCGTGAAAACCCTTACT-3') and primer 3 (3') (5'-TTTTCTAGATCAAGCGTAATCTGGAACATCGTATGGGTAAGCGTAATCTGGA ACATCGTATGGGTAAGCAGCTCTCAGACGCAGGACCAAGTGCGAGTGG-3'). PCR fragment was cloned into the XbaI and EcoRI sites of the pcDNA 3.1() expression vector. All clones were verified by sequencing.
Transfection and reporter assays. As previously described (24), 293 and HeLa cells were propagated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and transfected according to the manufacturer's protocol with TransIT LT1 transfection reagent (Mirus). Jurkat cells were propagated in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum and transfected with DMRIE-C reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. To assay luciferase activity, cells were transfected with a plasmid DNA mixture containing reporter plasmids, 500 ng of HTLV-1-Luc, and 500 ng of Rous sarcoma virus ß-galactosidase. Total amounts of plasmid DNA were normalized by addition of pcDNA3. Luciferase activity was measured 48 h after transfection. Cells were washed twice with 1x phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed in 1x luciferase lysis buffer (Promega). Cell extracts used for the luciferase assay were first quantified for protein concentration and then normalized. Luciferase assay substrate (Promega) was used according to the manufacturer's protocol, and activity was measured in an Opticom II luminometer (MGM Instruments). ß-Galactosidase activity was measured with Galacto-Star (Tropix) as described by the manufacturer. Luciferase activities were normalized for transfection efficiency based on galactosidase readings. All transfections were performed at least three times. Error bars represent standard deviations.
Ex vivo ubiquitination assays. To assess ubiquitination ex vivo, cells were transfected with LT1 reagent as above. Cells were lysed under denaturing conditions. Briefly, cells were washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in 500 µl of either mild denaturing radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 20 mM ß-glycerophosphate, and complete protease inhibitors) or strong denaturing RIPA buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and complete protease inhibitors). Proteins were separated on 10% polyacrylamide gels, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and developed with the relevant antibodies.
Nickel-agarose chromatography. We transfected 106 293 cells with Tax, pHA-Ub, or pHis-Ub expression vector and lysed in Ni-agarose lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, 0.05% Tween 20, 100 µg of N-ethylmaleimide per ml, and complete protease inhibitor). His-ubiquitin-conjugated proteins were purified by nickel chromatography (Ni-NTA-agarose, Qiagen) from cells cotransfected with Tax and His-ubiquitin. The beads were washed successively 10 times with Ni-agarose wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 0.05% Tween 20). In order to reduce nonspecific binding to beads as much as possible, nickel binding proteins were resuspended in 2x sample buffer supplemented with 200 mM imidazole and heated for 10 min at 95°C before being subjected to Western blotting with anti-Tax antibody.
|
|
|---|
No ubiquitin-conjugated Tax was observed when cells were lysed in the absence of N-ethylmaleimide (Fig. 1, upper panel) or in the presence of iodoacetamide (Fig. 1, middle panel). However, in the presence of N-ethylmaleimide (Fig. 1, lower panel), we detected both a prominent anti-Tax reactive band at 40 kDa, as expected for unmodified Tax (Fig. 1, lane 2), and a slower migrating form consistent with monoubiquitinated Tax (Fig. 1, lane 3). (Even upon prolonged overexposure of our immunoblot), whereupon a progressive ladder of Tax bands could be seen (Fig. 2A, lane 2), monoubiquitination was by far the predominant Tax modification. Direct quantification of the blot showed that approximately 25% of the total amount of Tax was monoubiquitinated in this assay (Fig. 2A, lane 2). We further noted that monoubiquitinated Tax species can also be observed (albeit with lesser efficiency) without N-ethylmaleimide if Tax-transfected 293 or HeLa cells were directly lysed with hot boiling sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (Fig. 2B, lanes 2 and 4).
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Isopeptidase inhibitors are required to detect ubiquitinated Tax. 293 cells were transfected with 2 µg of a plasmid expressing empty vector (lane 1), Tax alone (lane 2), or Tax with a second plasmid expressing Myc-ubiquitin (Ub) (4 µg) (lane 3). Whole-cell extracts were prepared by lysis in RIPA buffer (see Materials and Methods) and subjected to immunoblotting (IB) with anti-Tax antibody. Where indicated, N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) or iodoacetamide (IAA) was included at 10 mM.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Detection of ubiquitinated Tax in transfected cells and in HTLV-1-transformed T cells. 293 or HeLa cells were transfected with 2.5 µg of control pcDNA3 vector (lane 1, panel A; lanes 1, 3, panel B) or a Tax-expressing plasmid (lane 2 panel A; lanes 2, 4, panel B). Whole-cell extracts were prepared either by lysis in RIPA buffer supplemented with N-ethylmaleimide (panel A) or in hot 2x sodium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (panel B) and subjected to immunoblotting with anti-Tax. Tax-ubiquitin (Ub) indicates the position of monoubiquitinated Tax. In panel C, Jurkat, C8166-45 (C81), and MT4 cells were fractionated into cytoplasmic (C) and nuclear (N) portions with the NE-PER kit (Pierce). Immunoblotting was performed with polyclonal anti-Tax. Blotting of the same samples with anti-Sp1 verified the proper separation of nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions. The isopeptidase inhibitor N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was included at 10 mM. Lane MW, size standards (sizes shown in kilodaltons).
|
Next, to verify that the observed modification is ubiquitination, we transfected 293 cells with a Tax-expressing vector with or without a second plasmid expressing histidine (His)-tagged ubiquitin (His-ubiquitin). His-tagged protein can be captured with nickel-agarose. We reasoned that if Tax were ubiquitinated with His-ubiquitin, then His-ubiquitin-Tax would be retained by Ni beads. Accordingly, transfected cell lysates were chromatographed over nickel-agarose (Ni-agarose pull down), and bound proteins were queried for Tax moieties. We indeed observed, in Tax- and His-ubiquitin-cotransfected samples (Fig. 3A, lanes 4 and 8), an enriched pulldown of a
47-kDa anti-Tax reactive band consistent with mono-His-Tax-ubiquitin (Fig. 3A, lane 8).
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Identification of His-ubiquitin-conjugated Tax by Ni-agarose chromatography. His-ubiquitin-Tax but not HA-ubiquitin-Tax is bound by nickel-agarose beads. (A) 293 cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing the control vector (lanes 1 and 5), His-ubiquitin (Ub) (lanes 2 and 6), Tax (4 µg) (lanes 3 and 7), or Tax (4 µg) plus His-ubiquitin (4 µg; lanes 4 and 8). His-ubiquitin-conjugated proteins were captured by nickel-agarose chromatography (lanes 5 to 8; see Materials and Methods). Proteins bound to nickel-agarose beads were detected by Western blotting with anti-Tax (lanes 5 to 8). The starting cell extracts were also immunoblotted with anti-Tax (lanes 1 to 4). Arrows point to the migration positions expected for Tax and His-ubiquitin-Tax. (B) 293 cells were transfected with the control plasmid (lanes 1 and 5) or Tax with decreasing amounts (8 µ and 4 µg) of a plasmid expressing HA-ubiquitin (HA-Ub) (lanes 2, 3 and 6, 7). Tax-His6, a Tax protein containing six histidines at its C terminus, was used as a positive control (lanes 7 and 14). Proteins were chromatographed over nickel-agarose. Proteins bound to nickel-agarose beads were subjected to Western blotting with anti-Tax (lanes 8 to 14). The starting cell extracts were also immunoblotted with anti-Tax antibody (lanes 1 to 7). The arrow labeled Tax indicates the migration position of unmodified protein; the arrow labeled HA-ubiquitin-Tax indicates the migration position of HA-monoubiquitinated Tax; and the arrow labeled Tax-His6 indicates the migration position of input and bead-retained Tax-His6 protein.
|
Ubiquitination of Tax reduces its transcriptional activity. An increasing number of ubiquitin-conjugated proteins have been reported (2, 10, 20, 46, 47, 55, 60, 63). The functional impact of monoubiquitination remains complex and not well understood (20). We wondered how monoubiquitination of Tax might influence its function.
To examine whether Tax's transcriptional activity was affected by ubiquitination, we measured luciferase activity in 293 cells transfected with a luciferase reporter under the control of either an NF-
B-responsive promoter (3
B-Luc; Fig. 4A) or the HTLV-1 long terminal repeat (HTLV-Luc; Fig. 4B). The reporter plasmids (HTLV-Luc and 3
B-Luc) were either transfected individually into cells or cotransfected with Tax and increasing amounts of Myc-ubiquitin. We found that increasing the amount of Myc-ubiquitin plasmid enhanced the formation of Tax-ubiquitin (Fig. 4A,
Tax; lanes 6, 7, and 8) and correlated with up to a fourfold decrease in Tax's transcriptional activity on either the NF-
B (Fig. 4A) or the HTLV-1 long terminal repeat (Fig. 4B) promoter. As a control, transfection of a SUMO-1-expressing vector (HA-SUMO) did not affect Tax activity (Fig. 4C).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Ubiquitin but not SUMO modification decreased Tax-mediated transcription. (A) 293 cells were cotransfected with the 3 B-Luc plasmid (NF- B-dependent luciferase reporter) and control vector (lane 1) or 3 B-Luc with the Myc-ubiquitin (Ub) vector in increasing concentrations (2 µg, lanes 2 and 6; 4 µg, lanes 3 and 7; and 8 µg, lanes 4 and 8), or 3 B-Luc with the Tax-expressing vector alone (2 µg; lane 5) or with increasing amounts of the Myc-ubiquitin vector (2, 4, and 8 µg; lanes 6, 7, and 8). The same amounts of cellular extract from each transfected sample were subjected to the luciferase assay and then analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Tax. To normalize for protein loading, membranes were stripped in 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate-62.5 mM Tris-HCl-100 mM ß-mercaptoethanol for 30 min at 55°C and reblotted with an antitubulin antibody. The isopeptidase inhibitor N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) was included at 10 mM in the lysis buffer. (B) 293 cells were cotransfected with HTLV-Luc and control vector (lane 9),or HTLV-Luc- and Myc-ubiquitin-expressing vector in increasing concentrations: 2 µg (lanes 10 and 14), 4 µg (lanes 11 and 15), and 8 µg (lanes 12 and 16), or HTLV-Luc- and Tax-expressing vector (2 µg) (lane 13), with increasing amounts of Myc-ubiquitin-expressing vector (2, 4, and 8 µg; lanes 14, 15, and 16). The same amounts of cellular extract from each sample were subjected to the luciferase assay (see Materials and Methods). (C) 293 cells were transfected with HTLV-Luc and the control vector (lane 17), HTLV-Luc plus the HA-SUMO vector (8 µg; lane 18), HTLV-Luc and Tax (2 µg; lane 19), and HTLV-Luc and Tax (2 µg) plus HA-SUMO (8 µg) (lane 20). The same amounts of cellular extract from each transfected sample were analyzed by the luciferase assay. Values are averages ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. (D) Jurkat cells were cotransfected with HTLV-Luc and the control vector (lane 21), HTLV-Luc plus HA-ubiquitin (2 µg) vector (lane 22), HTLV-Luc plus antisense HA-ubiquitin (AS HA-Ub; 2 µg) (lane 23), HTLV-Luc plus Tax (2 µg; lane 24), HTLV-Luc plus Tax plus HA-ubiquitin (2 µg; lane 25), or HTLV-Luc plus Tax plus antisense HA-ubiquitin (2 µg, lane 26). Identical amounts of cellular extracts prepared from each of the transfections were used in luciferase assays. Western blotting with antitubulin verified that equal amounts of extract were used in the assays.
|
The findings established with transfection-mediated overexpression of ubiquitin do not comment directly on the physiological effect of endogenous ubiquitin on Tax function. To ask systematically if intracellular ubiquitin plays a role in moderating the transcriptional activity of Tax, we attempted to knockdown endogenous ubiquitin expression (Fig. 5). We were unable to construct an anti-ubiquitin short interfering RNA that could reduce cellular ubiquitination activity. However, we did create and test successfully an antisense ubiquitin vector (HA-ubiquitin) which significantly, albeit not completely, reduced endogenous ubiquitin activity (Fig. 5A, compare lanes 1 and 4 to lanes 3 and 6). Thus, at the highest level of antisense HA-ubiquitin overexpression (Fig. 5A, lanes 3 and 6), the normal ambient levels of endogenous ubiquitination of cellular proteins (Fig. 5A, lanes 1 and 4), as measured by Western blotting with anti-ubiquitin antiserum, were clearly reduced.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Knockdown of endogenous ubiquitin with anti-sense ubiquitin increased Tax activity. 293 cells were cotransfected with HTLV-Luc-expressing plasmid in the presence or absence of an antisense (AS) HA-ubiquitin (Ub) vector. Lane 1 and 4 were transfected with an empty vector and Tax, respectively. Antisense HA-ubiquitin was introduced in increasing concentrations (2 µg, lanes 2 and 5; 4 µg, lanes 3 and 6). (A) Half of the transfected cells were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-ubiquitin polyclonal serum. Normalization of sample loading was based on probing for -tubulin (lower panel). (B) The second half of the transfected cells were subjected, as indicated, to the luciferase assay. Values are averages ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. The amount of Tax expression was also quantified by Western blotting (bottom, -Tax). To ensure equivalence of protein loading, membranes were stripped in 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate-62.5 mM Tris-HCl-100 mM ß-mercaptoethanol for 30 min at 55°C and reblotted with antitubulin antibody (bottom, -tubulin).
|
Tax uses separate domains to activate the HTLV-1 long terminal repeat and NF-
B (25). The observed decrease in both functions as a consequence of ubiquitination (Fig. 4) suggested that ubiquitin addition either promoted proteasomal degradation of Tax or altered Tax conformation globally. The former explanation seemed unlikely because we observed no significant change in steady-state amounts of Tax with increased transfection of Myc-ubiquitin (Fig. 4A,
Tax, lanes 5 to 8). To further verify a lack of proteasomal involvement in Tax activity, we next treated 293 cells transfected with combinations of HTLV-Luc, Tax, and HA-ubiquitin with or without 10 µM MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, for 12 h (Fig. 6). Immunoblotting of total cell lysates with anti-HA revealed, as expected, the ubiquitination of many cellular proteins (Fig. 6A,
HA, top). The stability of these ubiquitinated proteins was enhanced by MG132 (Fig. 6A, compare lanes 2 and 5 to 3 lanes and 6), indicating that our treatment did successfully inhibit ubiquitination-dependent proteasomal activity. By contrast, MG132 treatment in the context of increased HA-ubiquitin transfection neither increased Tax's stability (Fig. 6A,
Tax, lane 6) nor enhanced its transcriptional activity (Fig. 6B. lane 12). Both results support a lack of involvement of the proteasome in the functional activity of ubiquitin-modified Tax.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Proteasome inhibition by MG132 treatment does not affect monoubiquitin-mediated repression of Tax activity. 293 cells were cotransfected with HTLV-Luc and a control plasmid (lane 1), HTLV-Luc plus HA-ubiquitin (8 µg) (lane 2), or HTLV-Luc plus HA-ubiquitin plus MG132 (10 µM for 12 h; lane 3). Lanes 4, 5, and 6 are the same as as lanes 1, 2, and 3 but also included transfection with a Tax plasmid. (A) Half of the transfected samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblotting with anti-HA, anti-Tax, or antitubulin. (B) The other half of the transfected cells, as indicated, were subjected to the luciferase assay to quantify expression from the long terminal repeat promoter. Values are averages ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Monoubiquitin addition to Tax reduces transcriptional activity. 293 cells were transfected with HTLV-Luc and 2 µg of a control vector (lane 1) or a vector expressing Tax (2 µg; lane 4) alone or Tax plus a second plasmid expressing Myc-wild-type (WT) ubiquitin (Ub) (4 µg; lane 5), or Tax plus a second plasmid expressing Myc-ubiquitin K48R (4 µg; lane 6). Lanes 2 and 3 contain transfections with Myc-wild-type ubiquitin alone and Myc-ubiquitin K48R alone, respectively. (A) Half of the transfected cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (see Materials and Methods) and subjected to immunoblotting with anti-Tax (top). To assess the equivalence of protein loading, membranes were stripped and reblotted with an antitubulin antibody (bottom). (B) The other half of the transfected 293 cells were subjected to the luciferase assay (lanes 7 to 12). Graphed results represent the averages from three independent transfections. (C) Schematic representation of the construction of an in-frame Tax-ubiquitin fusion protein (top), with the immunoblotting analysis (bottom) of the expression of Tax (lane 14) and in-frame Tax-ubiquitin (lane 15). (D) 293 cells were cotransfected with 3 B-Luc (NF- B-dependent promoter) and control vector (lane 16), 3 b-Luc plus Tax (lane 17), and 3 B-Luc plus in-frame Tax-ubiquitin (lane 18). Luciferase assays were performed 48 h later. Values are averages ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.
|
7 kDa with no evidence of decreased stability (Fig. 7C, lane 15). We next compared Tax to in-frame Tax-ubiquitin fusion for transcriptional activity. Interestingly, in-frame Tax-ubiquitin was <30% as active as its wild-type counterpart (Fig. 7D, compare lane 17 to 18), a result similar to that seen with Myc-ubiquitin plus Tax cotransfections (Fig. 4A). Other explanations not withstanding, these findings are compatible with the notion that addition of a single ubiquitin molecule to Tax perturbs protein structure sufficiently to reduce functional activity. We note that this interpretation is consistent with suggestions elsewhere that ubiquitin modification can change the conformation of substrates such as the TRAF6 protein (28). |
|
|---|
Here, we report that, like Tat (2), Tax is also modified by ubiquitin. However, the effect of ubiquitination on Tax is different from its effect on Tat. It was recently reported that polyubiquitin conjugation plays a nonproteolytic role in enhancing Tat's transcriptional activity (2). In contrast to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat, we find that Tax is predominantly monoubiquitinated (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, ubiquitin modification affected the transcriptional activity of Tax differently. For Tat, overexpression of ubiquitin enhanced transcriptional activity; for Tax, overexpression of ubiquitin decreased transcriptional activity (Fig. 4). Interestingly, for neither Tat nor Tax was ubiquitin conjugation a proteasomal degradation signal (Fig. 4 and 6).
Whereas ubiquitin addition was proposed to facilitate the interaction of Tat with a positive transcription factor (i.e., the regulatory 19S subunit of the proteasome machinery) (2, 7, 13), we showed that a single ubiquitin addition led to a less active Tax protein.
Pending definitive physical structural characterization, we suggest provisionally that because monoubiquitination represses two discrete Tax functions (HTLV-1 long terminal repeat and NF-
B activation) without altering steady-state stability, this modification may promote a conformational change resulting in a less active form of Tax (Fig. 4, 6, and 7). We have observed that ubiquitin does not change Tax localization inside cells (V. R. K. Yedavalli, unpublished observations). Hence, mislocation of protein is unlikely to be an explanation for reduced Tax activity.
Monoubiquitination appears to be a physiologically relevant modification for HTLV-1 in that >50% or more of Tax was observed to have this conjugation in C8166-45 and MT4 cells treated with isopeptidase inhibitors (Fig. 2C). We did find that under different experimental conditions, various amounts of monoubiquitinated Tax were seen. Potentially, this can be explained by rapid intracellular recycling by deubiquitination of Tax-ubiquitin to its unmodified form. Indeed, it is known that the mammalian genome encodes more than 90 deubiquitinating enzymes (5). Proteins such as p53 and TRAF6 have now been demonstrated to be regulated by deubiquitination as well as ubiquitination (28, 65). Whether ubiquitinated Tax is reversibly regulated by deubiquitination remains to be fully clarified. Nevertheless, to our knowledge, Tax represents the first example of a transcriptional activator which is suppressed in function by monoubiquitination. Formally, we cannot rule out that some unseen polyubiquitination event may also contribute to our functional findings on Tax, although the genetic results obtained with UbK48R (Fig. 7A) disfavor this possibility.
Contributed equally to this paper. ![]()
|
|
|---|
: implications for stimulus-specific interruption of oncogenic signaling. Oncogene 22:8912-8923.[CrossRef][Medline]
b activation. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 16:1633-1638.[CrossRef][Medline]
B. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 12:207-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
B activation. Oncogene 20:4484-4496.
B pathway and is dependent on p53 phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3377-3386.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»