Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, October 2004, p. 11263-11271, Vol. 78, No. 20
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.20.11263-11271.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Pierre Sonigo*
Département des Maladies Infectieuses, Institut Cochin, INSERM U567, CNRS UMR 8104, Université René Descartes, Paris, France
Received 6 April 2004/ Accepted 2 June 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, the question of the transcriptional activity of the unintegrated HIV-1 DNA species has been raised, and many studies have suggested that they could support transcription. Indeed, following transfection of synthetic DNA molecules mimicking the unintegrated forms of HIV-1 DNA, infectious viruses were detected (7). By using HIV-1 integrase-defective viruses, other studies have reported synthesis of viral proteins and/or particles upon infection, albeit transiently and at a low level (8, 25, 27, 32, 37, 39-41). In addition, expression of viral genes in the absence of measurable integrated viral DNA upon infection with HIV-1 integrase-competent viruses was reported, suggesting that expression from unintegrated viral DNA molecules does not require integration inhibition (40, 41). Nevertheless, the presence of undetected integrated HIV-1 DNA cannot be excluded in the latter studies. Moreover, possible transcription from illegitimately integrated HIV-1 DNA should be considered when using catalytically defective HIV-1 integrase mutants since host cell DNA recombination machinery may integrate some viral DNA molecules (16).
In this report, we addressed the question of unintegrated HIV-1 DNA expression in the setting of an infection with an integrase-competent virus. We first monitored levels of various viral DNA and RNA species in a single-round infection assay using highly sensitive quantification methods. In addition, we investigated specifically the transcriptional activity of the two-LTR circles. Our results demonstrate that these unintegrated HIV-1 DNA species are naturally transcribed during infection.
|
|
|---|
env viruses, the pR7 Neo
env vector (gift from U. Hazan) and an expression vector encoding the glycoprotein G of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV-G) were cotransfected into 293T cells. The pR7 Neo
env vector was constructed by deleting the envelope coding sequence of the HIV-1 R7 Neo genome (14), in which a neomycin resistance gene replaces HIV-1 nef. Transfection assays were carried out using the calcium phosphate method. Viral supernatants were filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size-filter and frozen at 80°C. Measurement of p24gag antigen production. HIV-1 p24gag antigen contents in viral inocula and culture supernatants were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Paris, France).
Viral infections. CEM cells were infected by VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1 R7 viruses with 35 ng of p24gag antigen per 106 cells. One hour after infection, cells were washed in a large volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), exposed to trypsin (25 µg/ml) for 1 min at 37°C, and washed once with medium and twice with PBS supplemented with RNase A (40 µg/ml). Then cells were resuspended and maintained in fresh medium. When required, cells were treated for 2 h in the presence of 100 µM zidovudine (AZT; Sigma, Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) before infection and then infected, washed, and cultured all in the presence of 100 µM AZT to inhibit reverse transcription (RT). One to 3 million cells were collected at each time point. To digest residual transfection plasmid, collected cell samples were washed in PBS and incubated with 750 to 1,500 U of DNase I (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France) in a buffer comprising 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl2 for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed in PBS, and dry cell pellets were frozen at 80°C until use.
HeLa cells were infected by incubation with VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1 R7 virus for 3 h by using 35 ng of p24gag antigen per 106 cells and then washed three times with PBS and cultured in fresh medium in the presence of 3 µM aphidicolin until 24 h postinfection. Infected cells were then either maintained again for 72 h in the presence of fresh aphidicolin or washed thoroughly and cultured without drug during the same period. At each time point, HeLa cells were collected following exposure to trypsin and treated as described above to eliminate residual transfection plasmids.
DNA and RNA isolation. Total cell DNA was extracted with a QIAamp blood DNA minikit (QIAGEN, Courtaboeuf, France). Total cell RNA was extracted with the RNeasy minikit (QIAGEN); the procedure involved an "on-column" DNase I digestion step performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. To extract RNA from extracellular virions, 300 µl of culture supernatant was mixed with 5 x 106 uninfected cells to act as an RNA carrier and the mixture was lysed immediately by adding 600 µl of ß-mercaptoethanol-containing RTL buffer, which is supplied with the RNeasy minikit (QIAGEN). Then, RNA was recovered according to the manufacturer's instructions for total cell RNA extraction.
Quantification of total HIV-1 DNA, two-LTR circles, and integrated HIV-1 DNA. Quantifications were performed by real-time PCR on a Light Cycler instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) using the second-derivative-maximum method provided by the Light Cycler quantification software, version 3.5 (Roche Diagnostics). Sequences of primers and probes are given in Table 1. Total HIV-1 DNA copy number was determined by quantification of viral DNA molecules that achieved the second strand transfer of RT using previously described primers (5) that annealed in the U5 region of the LTR (MH 531) and in the 5' end of the gag gene (MH 532) (Fig. 1a). Two-LTR circles were amplified with primers spanning the LTR-LTR junction (HIV F and HIV R1) (Fig. 1b). U5-gag sequences and two-LTR junctions were amplified in duplicate from 1/50 of total cell DNA. Reaction mixtures contained 1x Light Cycler Fast Start DNA master hybridization probes (Roche Diagnostics), 4 mM MgCl2, 300 nM forward and reverse primers, and 200 nM (each) fluorogenic hybridization probe, in a final volume of 20 µl. PCR cycle conditions for two-LTR circle and total HIV-1 DNA amplifications are given in Table 2. Copy numbers of total HIV-1 DNA and two-LTR circles were determined in reference to a standard curve prepared by amplification of quantities ranging from 10 to 105 copies of cloned DNA with matching sequences.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primer and probe sequencese
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Real-time PCR and RT-PCR strategies for the quantification of various HIV-1 DNA and RNA species. Primer and probe locations for amplification of total HIV-1 DNA (a), two-LTR circles (b), and integrated HIV-1 DNA (c) are shown. (d) Schematic representation of the genetic organization of the HIV-1 genome and of some viral transcripts. Unspliced viral RNA is quantified by amplification of a gag sequence that is present only in the full-length viral RNA species. Primers encompassing major donor (SD) and acceptor (SA) splice sites involved in the formation of tat, rev, and nef mRNA are used to quantify multiply spliced viral transcripts. Thin arrows, primers; thick arrows, probes.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PCR and RT-PCR cycle conditions
|
Cell equivalents in sample DNA were calculated based on the amplification of the ß globin gene (two copies per diploid cell) with commercially available materials (Control kit DNA; Roche Diagnostics). Two-LTR circle, total, and integrated HIV-1 DNA levels were expressed as copy numbers per 106 cells.
Quantification of RNA species.
Quantifications of RNA species were performed by real-time one-step RT-PCR with the Light Cycler instrument. Quantifications were achieved using the second-derivative-maximum method provided by the Light Cycler quantification software, version 3.5. Amplification products were detected by using either a hybridization probe format for both multiply spliced and U5-U3 HIV-1 RNA quantifications or a TaqMan probe format for unspliced HIV-1 RNA. Unspliced viral RNA was quantified by amplification of a gag sequence, as it is only present in the full-length form of viral RNA (Fig. 1d). Primers encompassing donor and acceptor splice sites involved in the formation of tat, rev, and nef mRNA were used to quantify multiply spliced viral transcripts (Fig. 1d). Sequences of primers and probes are given in Table 1. RT-PCR experiments were performed on 1/50 of total cell RNA in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 1x Light Cycler RNA master hybridization probes (Roche Diagnostics), 3.25 mM Mn(II) acetate, and a 500 nM primer pair and 200 nM corresponding fluorogenic probe (Table 1). RT-PCR cycle conditions are described in Table 2. Quantities of the various HIV-1 RNA species were determined in reference to a standard curve prepared by amplification of serial dilutions of in vitro-transcribed RNA (RiboMAX large-scale RNA production system; Promega, Charbonnières, France) containing matching sequences into 10 ng of bacteriophage MS2 RNA (Roche Diagnostics)/µl. Determination of cell equivalents in CEM RNA samples was performed by measuring levels of CD3
mRNA, which were reported to be unaffected by HIV-1 infection, in a lymphoid cell line (38) and using previously described primers and probes (30). Determination of cell equivalents in HeLa RNA samples was performed by measuring levels of cyclophilin A mRNA. Amplifications of CD3
and cyclophilin A mRNA sequences were performed by one-stepRT-PCR using reaction mixtures identical to those described above. Specific RT-PCR cycle conditions are shown in Table 2. Standard curves for CD3
and cyclophilin A mRNA quantifications were generated by amplification of serial dilutions of total cell RNA from a known number of uninfected cells. Copy numbers of HIV-1 RNA species are then expressed as copies per 106 cells.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Kinetic analysis of HIV-1 DNA and RNA synthesis in a single-round infection assay. CEM cells were infected by the VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1 R7 virus, and levels of intracellular HIV-1 DNA and RNA species and that of extracellular virus-like particles were monitored over a 15-day period. (a) Dynamics of total and integrated HIV-1 DNA species, together with that of HIV-1 DNA molecules bearing an LTR-LTR junction, during the first 24 h of infection. (b and c) Synthesis and fate of total and integrated HIV-1 DNA (b) and of HIV-1 DNA molecules bearing an LTR-LTR junction (c) over the 15-day period. (d and e) Dynamics of intracellular unspliced (US) and multiply spliced (MS) HIV-1 RNA during the first 24 h p.i. (d) and during the whole culture period (e). (f) Virus-like particles released in supernatant as determined by measuring levels of p24gag antigen. Values are means ± standard errors of the means. The scales in panels a and d are logarithmic. Depicted results were obtained from a representative experiment.
|
env genome (HIV-1 HXB2 background) may account for our preliminary observations. To investigate whether the lag between RT, circularization, or integration of viral DNA and transcription is a natural event during HIV-1 replication, we repeated the previous experiment using the wild-type HIV-1 BRU virus. Over the first 24 h upon infection, the kinetics of HIV-1 DNA and RNA synthesis were comparable to those observed with the VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1 R7 virus (data not shown). We thus concluded that viral transcription is a true late event of the HIV-1 replication cycle, and we therefore inferred from our data that only the HIV-1 DNA species that persists for a sufficient period of time within an infected cell would be transcribed efficiently. Evidence for transcription from a DNA molecule comprising an LTR-LTR junction. A previous report has shown that the HIV-1 DNA molecules that have not been integrated or circularized upon infection are degraded rapidly (6). Thus, we assumed from our data that unintegrated linear DNA species could not be effective templates for transcription because of their short half-lives. In contrast, the circular species of HIV-1 DNA might be transcribed efficiently, because of their intrinsic molecular stability (6). To test this hypothesis, we developed an assay for the specific detection of viral transcripts promoted from circular forms of viral DNA. We particularly focused on the two-LTR circles of HIV-1 DNA, because they comprise two tandem repeats of the viral promoter in direct orientation, in contrast to the other viral DNA species. Since transcription initiation from such circular molecules might arise from the beginning of each R region, viral transcripts initiated from the upstream start site would contain the U5-U3 sequence (Fig. 3a). To examine such a possibility, we developed a new RT-PCR method to quantify viral RNA containing a U5-U3 sequence and then we attempted to detect such viral transcripts in cell RNA extracts from CEM cells infected by the VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1 R7 virus. U5-U3 transcripts were effectively detected in these cells, at times when the synthesis of multiply spliced transcripts became distinguishable, i.e., 24 h p.i. (Fig. 3b). Then, the level of U5-U3 RNA varied with a trend similar to those for the other intracellular RNA species, reaching a maximum level by 96 h p.i. Surprisingly, the U5-U3 RNA level continued increasing from 24 to 96 h p.i., whereas that of the viral DNA species bearing an LTR-LTR junction decreased from 24 h p.i. to reach a steady level at 96 h p.i. (Fig. 2c). The two-LTR circles of HIV-1 DNA are stable DNA species incapable of self-replication, and, consequently, they were shown to be diluted as a function of cell division (6, 31). Therefore, cell division may account for the decrease in the two-LTR circle level observed before 96 h p.i. In contrast, we previously suggested that steady LTR-LTR junction levels from 96 h p.i. until the end of the culture might be explained by the nonspecific integration of some two-LTR circles into the host cell genome (4). Accordingly, our findings suggest that, from 96 h p.i. until the end of the culture, expression of the U5-U3 RNA depended on an integrated molecular form carrying an LTR-LTR junction, rather than on an unintegrated one.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Evidence for transcription from a DNA molecule carrying an LTR-LTR junction. (a) Location of transcription start sites within tandem LTR repeats of a two-LTR circle and representation of the U5-U3 viral transcript expressed from the upstream promoter. The U3, R, and U5 sequences within the LTR are indicated. Arrowheads, transcription start sites. (b) Kinetic analysis of U5-U3 RNA synthesis in CEM cells infected by the VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1 R7 virus. Values are means ± standard errors of the means. Depicted results were obtained from a representative experiment.
|
,
, and
(18). One day p.i., at times when two-LTR circle formation was achieved, aphidicolin was either removed from the culture medium to induce cell proliferation or maintained for 72 h. This protocol allowed a comparison of U5-U3 RNA levels measured when unintegrated two-LTR circles are diluted and when they persist due to prevention of cell division. This experiment was carried out with a HeLa cell line that was found to be more resistant, in the long term, to aphidicolin-induced cell toxicity than CEM cells (data not shown). As anticipated from a previous study (6), levels of viral DNA carrying an LTR-LTR junction remained constant from 24 to 96 h p.i. when aphidicolin was maintained in the culture medium, whereas this DNA species decreased rapidly when the drug was removed (Fig. 4a). In parallel, we found that levels of multiply spliced and unspliced HIV-1 RNA in aphidicolin-treated cells were reduced, indicating that viral expression was altered in these growth-arrested cells (Fig. 4b). It has been observed previously that replication of the HIV-1 LTR DNA increases transcription from the viral promoter (26). It is thus likely that, in our experiment, the use of aphidicolin to prevent host cell DNA replication lowered transcription from the integrated species of viral DNA compared to that in proliferating cells. In contrast, we observed that levels of U5-U3 RNA were higher in aphidicolin-treated cells than in untreated cells, but only at 72 and 96 h p.i. (Fig. 4c). To take into account that viral expression in aphidicolin-treated cells differed from that in untreated ones, we normalized the quantity of U5-U3 RNA to that of the multiply spliced viral RNA species that are synthesized concurrently. We observed that ratios of U5-U3 RNA to multiply spliced viral RNA were always higher in aphidicolin-treated cells, i.e., under conditions where unintegrated two-LTR circles were not diluted (Fig. 4d). This result demonstrates that the unintegrated form of viral DNA carrying an LTR-LTR junction is a genuine template for transcription. This finding was also supported by the ratios of U5-U3 RNA to unspliced viral RNA (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Unintegrated two-LTR circles are templates for transcription. HeLa cells were infected by the VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1 R7 virus and cultured in the presence of aphidicolin for 24 h. Then, aphidicolin was either maintained in the culture medium or removed to induce cell division. (a) Synthesis and fate of DNA bearing an LTR-LTR junction. (b) Dynamics of intracellular unspliced (US) and multiply spliced (MS) HIV-1 RNA. (c) Dynamics of intracellular U5-U3 HIV-1 RNA. (d) Ratios of U5-U3 RNA to multiply spliced viral RNA. Values are means ± standard errors of the means. Depicted results were obtained from a representative experiment.
|
|
|
|---|
In an effort to examine the potential transcriptional activity of the circular forms of HIV-1 DNA, we took advantage of the existence of two viral promoters in direct orientation in the two-LTR circles of HIV-1 DNA. Indeed, if such molecules were transcribed, the downstream LTR would promote the synthesis of transcripts encoding viral genes (such transcripts are undistinguishable from those expressed from other viral DNA species), whereas the upstream LTR might promote the synthesis of a specific RNA, namely, U5-U3 RNA. We actually detected the latter viral RNA species in a lymphoid cell line infected with HIV-1. However, due to the probable illegitimate integration of a fraction of the two-LTR circles into the cellular genome, we could not demonstrate at first that unintegrated circles had supported their synthesis. To distinguish transcription promoted from unintegrated and integrated molecules, we used the specific feature of the unintegrated two-LTR circles, i.e., they are diluted upon cell division (6, 31). We observed that levels of U5-U3 RNA were higher in growth-arrested cells, i.e., under conditions where unintegrated two-LTR circles are not diluted, than in dividing cells. These findings demonstrated that true unintegrated two-LTR circles are templates for transcription. However, the question arose of whether two-LTR circles can support expression of viral proteins, since the upstream LTR may promote synthesis of only a noncoding RNA. Indeed, transient- or stable-expression assays with plasmids containing two direct repeats of the HIV-1 LTR in tandem, each driving the expression of truncated genes, have previously shown that, in the presence of the HIV-1 Tat protein, the two viral promoters mutually interfered (11) but that they drove equivalent RNA levels (11, 17). Thus, these studies suggested that the level of transcripts promoted from the upstream LTR reflected the transcriptional activity of both promoters. Such an assumption supports the idea that the unintegrated two-LTR circles of HIV-1 are bona fide templates for viral protein synthesis.
Interestingly, it was demonstrated recently that a catalytically defective integrase HIV-1 vector can express a high level of an internally promoted transgene, but only in growth-arrested cells (33). In addition, replication of catalytically defective HIV-1 integrase mutants has been obtained upon infection of primary monocyte-derived macrophages and a human T-cell line (25). These results were achieved by incorporating the DNA replication origin of simian virus 40 (SV40) within the viral genome and by expressing concurrently the SV40 T antigen within infected cells. Consistent with our work, these two reports suggest that dilution of unintegrated viral DNA was responsible for occulting its transcriptional activity. Interestingly, two-LTR circles were the predominant HIV-1 DNA species in these experiments. Altogether, these studies and ours strongly support the idea that two-LTR circular forms of HIV-1 DNA are naturally transcribed during HIV-1 infection, thereby participating in virus replication.
Our results do not exclude the possibility that circular species of HIV-1 DNA bearing a single LTR sequence may be also transcribed during HIV-1 infection. Indeed, these circular viral genomes exhibit a molecular stability comparable to that of the two-LTR circles (31), and they were shown to be transcribed more efficiently in transfection assays (7). In addition, they are about ninefold more abundant than two-LTR circles in infected cells (1, 5). All these findings suggest that one-LTR circles may also be suitable expression templates for the virus and that they may significantly participate in its replication.
As anticipated (25), the demonstration of a transcriptional activity supported by unintegrated HIV-1 circles may offer an alternative to gene therapy approaches using a transgene expression system based on retroviral vector integration, especially when nondividing cells are targeted. Nevertheless, such a strategy requires further investigations to establish that HIV-1 circles can direct the formation of proteins in vivo and even infectious viral particles. If this is confirmed, it would indicate that cells containing viral DNA circles would constitute an additional and stable reservoir for HIV-1, as they are found in vivo (9, 15, 19, 23, 28, 35) and as circles bearing two LTR were shown to persist in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from HIV-1-infected patients, even under the best of our currently available antiretroviral treatments (3).
We thank Olfert Landt (TIB MOLBIOL) for the design of primers and hybridization probes. We also thank C. Petit, O. Delelis, S. Pierre, and T. Leste-Lasserre for helpful discussions and G. Langsley and P. Charneau for reviewing the manuscript.
Present address: Unité de Physiopathologie des Infections Lentivirales, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»