Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2004, p. 779-789, Vol. 78, No. 2
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.2.779-789.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and the Dallas Veterans Administration Medical Center, Dallas, Texas,1 The Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment and University of Turin, Turin, Italy2
Received 16 June 2003/ Accepted 28 September 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the angiogenic behavior stimulated by Tat has been well described, the signaling pathways underlying the accompanying endothelial cell morphological changes are poorly understood. Early during the response to other known angiogenic agents, such as vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), dramatic alterations in the endothelial cell actin cytoskeleton must occur to allow separation of interendothelial junctions and migration of cells to form vascular sprouts. Such actin cytoskeletal changes include ruffling of leading-edge membranes and depolymerization of trailing-edge stress fibers to allow treadmilling and locomotion to occur. Angiogenic endothelium also becomes leaky, since peripheral retraction occurs in conjunction with the breakdown of lateral intercellular junctions.
In the present study, we identify a signaling pathway through which HIV-1 Tat affects endothelial cell actin microfilament dynamics. Tat caused dramatic actin cytoskeletal rearrangements such as membrane ruffling, peripheral retraction, and subsequent cytoskeletal disassembly, which we found to be driven by activation of the MAP kinase kinase kinase kinase p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1). In addition, involvement of an endothelial cell NADPH oxidase downstream of PAK1 appeared necessary for these cytoskeletal changes.
|
|
|---|
GST-Tat production. SURE Escherichia coli (Stratagene) was transformed with pGEX-2TK, pGEX-Tat-86, pGEX-Tat C(22,25,27)A, or pGEX-Tat R(49,52,53,55,56,57)A and was induced with IPTG (isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside) for 3 to 4 h at 37°C, and the fusion proteins were extracted as previously described (10, 29), keeping all solutions degassed and at 4°C. The yield, stability, and biological activity of wild-type Tat (assessed as activation of endothelial cell c-Jun N-terminal kinase [JNK]) were highest when flash-frozen as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion.
Cell culture and transduction. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were obtained from BioWhittaker, grown in EGM-2 media, and used within five passages. Human lung microvascular endothelial cells (HLMVEC) were obtained from BioWhittaker, grown in EGM-2-MV media, and used on the first passage. Transfection was performed by electroporation after thymidine-induced cell cycle synchronization as previously described (29). Adenovirus transduction was achieved after infection of HUVEC at 70 to 90% confluence for 1 h at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100:1, followed by a 24-h recovery period in full media. In some experiments, cells were pretreated with the superoxide dismutase mimetic Mn(III) tetrakis(1-methyl-4-pyridil)porphyrin (MnTMPyP; Alexis) at 100 µM for 1 h.
Microscopy. HUVEC were plated on fibronectin-coated coverslip chambers (Nunc), and live cells were observed on a heated stage without fixation or permeabilization. Confocal images were obtained with an inverted Zeiss Axiovert S100TV microscope and the LSM 410 laser-scanning system. Fluorescence ratio imaging was performed by using Zeiss LSM (v3.98) software.
Kinase activities.
PAK1 activity was assessed by an immunoprecipitation kinase method. After treatment, HUVEC were harvested in cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM disodium EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 µg of leupeptin/ml, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), sonicated briefly, and immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-PAK1 (Santa Cruz). The kinase reaction was performed with 5 µg of myelin basic protein (Upstate) as a PAK1 substrate in the presence of [
32P]ATP (Perkin-Elmer) at 30°C for 30 min. For JNK activity, HUVEC were cotransfected with HA-JNK2 and either PAK1(K298A) or empty vector. The following day, an immunocomplex assay was performed with anti-HA (Santa Cruz) and 2 µg of GST-Jun as a substrate (29). Two-thirds of each sample was subjected to autoradiography, and one-third was subjected to immunoblot to assess capture of PAK1 or HA-JNK2.
p47phox phosphorylation. HUVEC were cotransfected with Flag-p47 and either PAK1(K298A) or empty vector, and the following day the medium was replaced with phosphate-free Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (Sigma) containing 0.5 mCi of [32P]orthophosphate/ml for 4 h. Cells were then stimulated with GST or GST-Tat (600 ng/ml) for 15 min and lysed on ice for 15 min in lysis buffer containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 0.5% deoxycholate. After it was sheared through a 23-gauge needle 10 times, the 13,000 x g supernatant was precleared and normalized for protein. Flag-p47 was immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag and washed four times in lysis buffer with sodium dodecyl sulfate and deoxycholate, twice in lysis buffer containing 0.5 M NaCl, and once in 50 mM Tris (pH 7.0). One-third of the immunoprecipitate was immunoblotted for p47phox to assess capture and loading, and the remainder was analyzed by autoradiography.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (55K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of GST-Tat on endothelial cell actin dynamics. (a) HUVEC were transfected with actin-GFP to visualize actin microfilament structures. Cells were subsequently treated with GST-Tat or GST alone for the indicated times and observed live and unfixed. At a concentration of 200 ng/ml, loss of stress fibers and peripheral retraction were seen within 5 min (b and c), and ruffling was observed within 5 min and peaking at approximately 20 min (b to d, arrows). (e) GST alone had no effect on actin structures. (g) At a concentration of 600 ng/ml, ruffling occurred early and was followed by the appearance of actin retraction fibers. (h) By 60 min, all cells showed marked collapse of the actin skeleton, with most cells displaying a reticular or a stellate cytosolic remnant. (i) Treatment with GST alone (600 ng/ml) had no effect on actin dynamics. Collapse of the actin cytoskeleton induced by cytochalasin D (10 µM) is shown in panel j for comparison.
|
![]() View larger version (82K): [in a new window] |
FIG.2. Effect of GST-Tat on HLMVEC. (a and c) Unstimulated HLMVEC or GST-treated HLMVEC transfected with actin-GFP displayed pronounced flattening and prominent stress fibers. (b) After treatment with 200 ng of GST-Tat/ml, stress fibers resorbed and edge ruffles appeared within 20 to 30 min, similar in character to changes observed in HUVEC. (d) At 600 ng of GST-Tat/ml, actin collapse and focal edge accumulation were seen.
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of Tat basic and cysteine-rich domains. HUVEC were transfected with actin-GFP and exposed to 600 ng of GST/ml (a), wild-type GST-Tat (b), GST-Tat R(49,52,53,55,56,57)A (c), or GST-Tat C(22,25,27)A (d). Whereas all cells exposed to wild-type GST-Tat displayed marked cytoskeletal collapse, cells exposed to GST-Tat containing mutations within the basic domain remained identical to GST-treated cells. Rare cells treated with the cysteine-rich domain mutant GST-Tat developed retraction fibers.
|
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of DsRed-Tat on endothelial cell actin dynamics. HUVEC were cotransfected with actin-GFP and DsRed-Tat and observed at the indicated times. Actin-GFP was imaged in the green channel (a, d, g, and j), and DsRed-Tat or DsRed was imaged in the red channel (b, e, h, and k). At 15 h, frequent ruffle formation was observed (a, arrows), and DsRed-Tat was seen accumulating in nucleoli, with occasional visualization in cytosol (b). Peripheral retraction started within 24 h (d), seen in DsRed-Tat-expressing cells (d to f). (g to i) By 48 h, DsRed-Tat-expressing cells displayed actin collapse identical to that after GST-Tat treatment. Actin changes were visualized only in DsRed-Tat-expressing cells and not in neighboring cells (i, arrow). Cells transfected with DsRed alone did not exhibit alterations in actin dynamics at 24 h (j to l) or 48 h (not shown).
|
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Activation of PAK1 by GST-Tat. HUVEC were treated with GST-Tat or GST (600 ng/ml) for the indicated times. PAK1 activation was assessed by IP kinase and phosphorylation of myelin basic protein (MBP). TNF (100 ng/ml) was added for 15 min as a positive control. The lower panel shows an immunoblot of immunoprecipitated PAK1 with anti-PAK1. HC, immunoglobulin heavy chain.
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effect of PAK1(K298A) on actin rearrangement. HUVEC were cotransfected with actin-GFP and DsRed-Tat and then infected with either Ad-lacZ or Ad-PAK1(K298A) (MOI = 100:1, 1 h) the following day. Cells were examined after 48 h. The upper panel shows immunoblot with anti-Myc, demonstrating expression of Myc-tagged PAK1(K298A) (DN-PAK1). Actin-GFP was imaged in the green channel (a and d), and DsRed-Tat was imaged in the red channel (b and e). DsRed-Tat-expressing cells infected with Ad-lacZ displayed prominent actin collapse (a to c), whereas DsRed-Tat-expressing cells infected with Ad-PAK1(K298A) retained normal morphology (d to f). (g and h) HUVEC were transfected with actin-GFP, infected with the corresponding adenoviruses, and treated with GST-Tat (600 ng/ml for 60 min). GFP-actin is shown. Cytoskeletal collapse seen in Ad-lacZ-infected cells was absent in Ad-PAK1(K298A)-infected cells.
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Effect of PAK1(K298A) on JNK activation. HUVEC were cotransfected with either empty vector or PAK1(K298A) (DN-PAK1), and with HA-JNK2. After 24 h, cells were treated with GST-Tat (600 ng/ml, 15 min), and HA-JNK2 activation was assessed by IP kinase. Capture of HA-JNK2 was assessed by immunoblotting for JNK (lower panel). PAK1(K298A) blocked JNK activation by GST-Tat.
|
![]() View larger version (71K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. DsRed-p47 translocates to Tat-induced membrane ruffles. HUVEC were cotransfected with actin-GFP and DsRed-p47. After stimulation of cells with GST (a to c) or GST-Tat (d to g) (200 ng/ml, 15 to 20 min), DsRed-p47 was imaged in the red channel (a and d), and actin-GFP was imaged in the green channel (b and e). DsRed-p47 translocated avidly to actin ruffles upon stimulation with GST-Tat (d to f). The green/red fluorescence ratio image of inset from panel f shows cancellation of actin-GFP signal by DsRed-p47 within ruffles (g), indicating colocalization of the two proteins. DsRed itself, when cotransfected with actin-GFP, did not translocate to ruffles (h to j). The green/red ratio image of inset from panel j shows relative enhancement of actin-GFP within ruffle relative to DsRed (k).
|
5-fold (average of two independent experiments), whereas GST alone did not (Fig. 9), a finding consistent with our prior observations that Tat activates an endothelial cell NADPH oxidase (10). Unlike the situation in phagocytes, detectable basal phosphorylation of p47phox was observed. Expression of PAK1(K298A) effectively blocked both basal and Tat-stimulated p47phox phosphorylation, demonstrating that PAK1 acts upstream of p47phox.
![]() View larger version (35K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Effect of PAK1(K298A) on p47phox phosphorylation. HUVEC were cotransfected with either empty vector or PAK1(K298A) (DN-PAK1) and with Flag-p47 and then stimulated with GST or GST-Tat (600 ng/ml). Flag-p47 was immunoprecipitated, and phosphorylation (upper panel) and protein capture (anti-Flag, lower panel) were assessed. GST-Tat increased phosphorylation of p47phox, whereas PAK1(K298A) completely blocked basal and Tat-induced p47phox phosphorylation.
|
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Effect of p67(V204A) on actin rearrangement. HUVEC were transfected with actin-GFP and then infected with Ad-lacZ (a and b) or Ad-p67(V204A) (c and d) (MOI = 100:1, 1 h). The upper panel shows immunoblot with anti-p67phox, demonstrating expression of p67(V204A) (DN-p67). (b) Cells infected with Ad-lacZ displayed prominent retraction and actin collapse after treatment with GST-Tat (600 ng/ml). (c and d) Expression of p67(V204A) completely suppressed actin cytoskeletal rearrangements. (e and f) HUVEC were transfected with actin-GFP and then pretreated with the superoxide dismutase mimetic MnTMPyP (100 µM, 1 h) prior to treatment with GST-Tat (600 ng/ml). MnTMPyP prevented the actin cytoskeletal changes induced by GST-Tat (f).
|
|
|
|---|
Extracellular Tat delivered as a GST fusion increased ruffle formation and peripheral retraction and at higher levels caused prominent loss of stress fibers with visible depolymerization and collapse of the actin cytoskeleton. These dramatic effects on actin dynamics are consistent with physiologic and biochemical studies demonstrating an increase in paracellular albumin permeability (21) and in phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins such as FAK, Pyk2, paxillin, and p130Cas (9) after Tat treatment. Interestingly, cellular expression of Tat as a DsRed fusion produced identical morphological changes, raising questions about the site of the molecular target(s) of Tat involved in cytoskeletal alterations. The appearance of normal cells in close proximity to collapsed, DsRed-Tat-expressing cells suggests that Tat may bind intracellular target proteins to effect such changes rather than being exported and acting in a paracrine fashion. This suggests other mechanisms for cytoskeletal signaling beyond ligation of known Tat receptors such as VEGFR2 and
Vß3/
5ß1 integrins (5, 23), although in the present study we have not excluded a receptor-mediated mechanism. An additional curiosity is that an intracellular site of action would be expected to reside within the cytosol or internal membrane surface, whereas DsRed-Tat accumulated in endothelial cell nucleoli. However, a cytosolic phase for DsRed-Tat was clearly seen in a fraction of cells, suggesting an equilibrium between nucleus and cytosol. This possibility is consistent with trafficking of a GFP-Tat protein, which also accumulates in nucleoli of HeLa cells (25). In this latter study, analysis of membrane fusion between transfected and nontransfected cells by using polyethylene glycol clearly demonstrated continuous shuttling of GFP-Tat between the nucleus and cytoplasm of HeLa cells.
Although the proximal molecular target of Tat responsible for initiating cytoskeletal changes is unknown, our data suggest early involvement of PAK1. PAK1, an MAP kinase kinase kinase kinase involved in mitogenic stimulation, is known to concentrate in membrane ruffles, and active mutants of PAK1 cause ruffle formation (7, 8). When expressed in extremely high levels achieved by microinjection, active PAK1 mutantscontaining deletions or mutations in the autoinhibitory domain or fusion with active Cdc42stimulate peripheral retraction, followed by actin depolymerization and collapse of the cytoskeleton (8, 16, 30), highly reminiscent of our findings with Tat. To our knowledge, such severe architectural derangements have not been previously observed without microinjection of these PAK1 mutants or cytochalasin treatment.
The relevance of PAK1 activation by Tat to HIV-1-infected patients may extend to tumor biology as well as AIDS vasculopathy. In tumor cells, PAK1 promotes migration and invasive behavior (1). Notably, Tat-expressing adenocarcinoma cells injected into mice produce aggressive, highly metastatic tumors (6), suggesting an active PAK1 phenotype and consistent with the biologically aggressive malignancies AIDS patients develop. In addition, during angiogenesis, endothelial cell behavior recapitulates that of tumor cells, becoming invasive, metastatic, and proliferative. Thus, angiogenic behavior may logically be linked to PAK1. Indeed, PAK1 has been linked to endothelial cell migration and contractility in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo (15, 17). The ability of Tat to activate endothelial PAK1 is therefore consistent with the intense angiogenesis invoked by Tat-secreting tumors and also with the development of invasive Kaposi's sarcoma-like vascular lesions in Tat-transgenic mice (6, 27). Accordingly, in AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, the malignant vascular cells migrate and invade much more aggressively than in non-HIV-related Kaposi's sarcoma.
Recently, we demonstrated that Tat activates an NADPH oxidase upstream of the JNK MAPK in endothelial cells (10). In addition, p47phox, the adapter subunit of this oxidase, was found to be constitutively associated with the cytoskeleton, and disruption of the actin cytoskeleton blocked Tat-induced signaling (10, 12), suggesting a functional relationship between the oxidase and the cytoskeleton. In the present study, our data suggest that activation of the endothelial NADPH oxidase occurs upstream of Tat-induced actin rearrangements. Exogenous oxidants are known to cause actin reorganization, and endogenous oxidants appear to be necessary for spontaneous endothelial cell migration (20). Thus, PAK1 may in part exert its cytoskeletal effects through NADPH oxidase activation, a premise supported by the dependence of p47phox phosphorylation on PAK1 kinase activity. Notably, Tat induced translocation of p47phox to membrane ruffles. These actin structures are known to be enriched in active PAK1, and oxidant production is focally produced in the ruffles of motile endothelial cells as well as phagocytes (14, 20). Finally, the demonstration that PAK1(K298A) blocked Tat-induced JNK activation is consistent with our prior observation that the NADPH oxidase also lies upstream of JNK activation by Tat (10). Thus, activation of PAK1 and the oxidase appear to control HIV-1 Tat signaling to both MAPK and cytoskeletal pathways.
This study was supported by NIH grants R01-HL061897 and R01-HL067256 and by the Veterans Administration.
|
|
|---|
5ß1 and
vß3 integrins and by mobilizing sequestered basic fibroblast growth factor. Blood 94:663-672.
-PAK reveals effects of the kinase on actin and focal complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:1129-1143.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»