Previous Article
Journal of Virology, January 2004, p. 1055-1062, Vol. 78, No. 2
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.2.1055-1062.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
RIII/Sa Mice with a High Incidence of Mammary Tumors Express Two Exogenous Strains and One Potential Endogenous Strain of Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus
Nurul H. Sarkar,1* Tatyana Golovkina,2 and Taher Uz-Zaman1,
Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912,1
The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 046092
Received 1 July 2003/
Accepted 28 September 2003

ABSTRACT
The inbred mouse strain RIII has long been known for shedding
large amounts of mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) particles
in milk and for the development of hormone-dependent early mammary
tumors at a very high incidence (>90%). We have established
one RIII subline (RIII/Sa) that shows a pattern of virus expression
and tumor incidence similar to that in RIII mice. In the present
study, we analyzed the milk and mammary tumors of RIII/Sa mice
for virus characterization by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)
cloning and sequencing of the open reading frame (ORF) of the
MMTV long terminal repeats (LTRs). Our results show that these
mice express a mixture of at least three different MMTV strains,
two of which, designated here as RIII/Sa MMTV-1 and RIII/Sa
MMTV-2, are exogenous. The third virus, RIII/Sa MMTV-3, appears
to carry the signature of an endogenous provirus,
Mtv-
17. Similar
studies done with the milk and mammary glands of another subline,
RIIIS/J, revealed that they do not express MMTV in their milk.
The RIII/Sa and RIIIS/J mice also exhibited differences in their
endogenous proviral contents. Twelve spontaneously developed
mammary tumors of RIII/Sa mice were examined for possible
Wnt-
1 and/or
int-
2/
Fgf3 mutations that are usually found to occur
in most mouse mammary tumors as a consequence of MMTV proviral
integration. This work led to the isolation of one MMTV-
Wnt-
1 junction fragment and one MMTV-
int-
2/
Fgf3 junction fragment
from 2 of the 12 tumors. Further analyses showed that both junction
fragments contained the RIII/Sa MMTV-2-specific LTR ORF, indicating
that this virus was involved in the development of both tumors.
Whether RIII/Sa MMTV-1 and/or RIII/Sa MMTV-3 plays any role
in mammary tumor development in RIII/Sa mice remains to be established.
Overall, the present study demonstrates, to our surprise, that
(i) RIII/Sa mice express, unlike other native mouse strains,
three strains of MMTVs; and (ii) the virions are completely
different from the virus expressed by another subline of RIII
mice, the BR6 mice.

INTRODUCTION
Bittner observed in 1936 that the presence of an agent in the
milk (milk factor) of an inbred laboratory strain of mice (C3H)
closely correlated with its potential for mammary tumor development
(
2). This discovery led to countless investigations into the
biology of mammary tumors in a number of standard laboratory
strains of mice, particularly, C3H, RIII, A, and GR. Some work
has also been done with BR6 mice, a strain that was derived
by breeding a C57BL female mouse with an RIII male (
10). Bittner's
milk agent was later identified to be an exogenous mouse mammary
tumor virus (MMTV) that is transmitted from viremic mothers
to their offspring via milk and induces mammary tumors (
6).
However, during the early 1970s, some laboratory mouse strains
were shown to carry variable copies of MMTV proviruses (endogenous
proviruses) in their genome irrespective of whether they shed
MMTV particles in their milk and/or develop mammary tumors (
36).
It is now known that all inbred strains of mice, as well as
some wild mice, contain multiple copies of MMTV proviral integrants
(
Mtvs), although most of them fail to produce infectious MMTV
particles. Interestingly, some
Mtvs, such as
Mtv-
2 in strain
GR and
Mtv-
1 in strain C3H, are expressed in mammary glands,
leading to virus production and shedding in milk (
23). However,
these two viral strains differ in their biology: while the GR
Mtv-
2 virus induces mammary tumors at an early age (<6 to
8 months) and at a high incidence (>90%), tumors developed
by the C3H
Mtv-
1 virus have a long latency period (>20 months),
and their incidence is not high (<50%). More importantly,
the virions that these mice produce are also transmitted as
infectious agents (exogenous) when newborn mice suckle on viremic
females. Other mouse strains, such as A and RIIIwhich
have been assumed to produce early in life only one strain of
milk-borne exogenous MMTV at high levels and to induce early
mammary tumors at a high incidence (>90%)are also
known to express smaller amounts of some endogenous proviruses.
For example, foster-nursing of newborn RIII pups to milk-borne-MMTV-free
BALB/c or C57BL mice results in significantly lowering the incidence
of mammary tumors (<10%) that arise late in life (>20
months). The inducer of such late-developing tumors in RIII/Saf
mice has been assumed to be an endogenous MMTV, and the virus
has been found to be shed in smaller amounts in the milk of
only high-parity mothers (
23).
Further studies on MMTV pathogenesis led to three other important observations. First, MMTV superantigen (Sag), a product of the open reading frame (ORF) contained within the 3' long terminal repeat (LTR) of the virus, was shown to interact with the Vß portion of specific T-cell receptors (TCrs) in MMTV-infected mice, causing virus infection and deletion or activation of certain T cells (3, 8, 11, 22, 40). These lymphoid cells serve as reservoirs for infection of the mammary gland. Second, MMTV does not carry any oncogene in its genome, and thus the mechanism by which it induces mammary tumors in mice is the ability of the virus to act as an insertional mutagen and activate the expression of an int family of cellular oncogenes (5, 12, 27). Finally, recombination between endogenous and exogenous viruses has been shown to result in the generation of new virus strains with a broader host range. For example, the endogenous Mtv-1 locus in C3H/HeN mice is highly transcribed in lactating mammary glands, but little or none of this viral RNA is packaged into virions. However, when these mice are infected with exogenous C3H MMTV, the endogenous Mtv-1 RNA is copackaged into virions, and the resultant recombinant virus infects mice with a broader host range than the parental C3H MMTV (13). Formation of new milk-borne MMTVs via recombination between endogenous and exogenous viruses has also been found in BALB/cT mice (14). Recombination between nonpathogenic (Mtv-17) and highly pathogenic (Mtv-2) endogenous MMTVs has also been observed to occur in GR mice (15). Since the presence of endogenous and/or exogenous MMTVs in different strains of mice is highly variable, it seems likely that specific recombination events between endogenous and exogenous viruses may lead to the expression of different MMTV strains in the milk of different mouse strains. In addition, some mouse strains may produce different strains of native proviruses. In fact, two different types of viruses with different biological characteristics have been shown to be present in at least one mouse strain, TES2 (26). These observations prompted us to address the question of whether or not low-parity RIII mice (designated henceforth as RIII/Sa) express multiple MMTV strains and, if so, to characterize the proviruses on the basis of their ORF sequences.

RIII/Sa mice express three strains of MMTVs.
The progeny of a mammary tumor-bearing 7-month-old RIII mouse
(4th parity) was isolated in 1974 and maintained as a separate
lineage, designated RIII/Sa, in the laboratory of N. Sarkar.
This subline has been maintained since 1974 by brother-sister
mating of young adults from high-parity (3rd or more) mothers
(
30). RIII/Sa mice produce large quantities of MMTV in their
milk (10
11 to 10
12 particles/ml) and develop early mammary tumors
(within 6 to 10 months) at a very high incidence (>90%).
To characterize the milk-borne MMTV expressed by low-parity
RIII/Sa mice and early mammary tumors, we took advantage of
the fact that sequences near the 3' end of the ORFs of different
MMTV strains are polymorphic (
41) and thus can be used to identify
the source of the viral genome. MMTV particles were partially
purified from the milk of RIII/Sa mothers of early and late
parities (
31). Virus was also isolated from the milk pellet
obtained from the stomachs of 2- to 4-day-old pups (
13). Viral
RNA, as well as RNAs from mammary tumors, mammary glands, and
spleens, was isolated with the TRIzol kit (GIBCO-BRL) according
to the instructions provided by the supplier. To remove possible
DNA contamination, RNA samples were subjected to poly(A) column
purification with the Oligotex kit (QIAGEN). Each RNA sample
was subjected to reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) with a pair
of primers containing sequences common to most MMTV LTRs. The
forward primer, FPC1, represented a region located about 400
bp upstream to the R domain of the LTR, while the reverse primer
(RP) contained sequences from the 3' end of the U3 and R regions
(Fig.
1A). The primers FPC1, FPC2, and RP were designed by using
the published sequences of BR6 MMTV (
25). Analyses by gel electrophoresis
of the RT-PCR amplification products that were synthesized with
viral RNA from 15 different milk samples and 12 mammary tumors
using the primers FPC1 and RP (Fig.
1) showed the presence of
products of two different sizes. The results obtained with two
such milk and two tumor samples are shown in Fig.
1B (lanes
2 and 4 and 6 and 8, respectively). For brevity, we have designated
the cDNAs on the basis of their source (milk, M; or tumor, T)
and size (large, L; or small, S) as ML, MS, TL, and TS, respectively.
It should noted that the relative amounts of the large and smaller
PCR products obtained from milk samples appeared to be similar
(lanes 2 and 4), whereas the smaller products produced by tumor
samples were significantly smaller in amount than the larger
products (lanes 6 and 8). Furthermore, 3 of the 12 tumors were
negative for the TS cDNA, and the TS products varied in amount
from one sample to the other. Overall, our observation indicated
that RIII/Sa mice express in their milk and mammary tumors at
least two different strains of MMTVs that differ in their LTR
sequences. We have designated these viruses as RIII/Sa MMTV-1
(representing the MS and TS bands) and RIII/Sa MMTV-2 (representing
the ML and TL bands).
To determine the sequence organization of the cDNAs representing
the two viral strains, both milk- and tumor-derived cDNA products
were fractionated by preparative (1.5 to 2.0%) agarose gel electrophoresis.
The bands of interest were purified with GenEluteMinus ethidium
bromide (EtBr) spin columns (Supelco, Bellefonte, Pa.) and precipitated
with glycogen. The cDNA products were then cloned into pGEM-T
Easy Vector Systems II (Promega) according to the manufacturer's
protocol. Positive clones were expanded, and plasmid DNA was
isolated with the Wizardplus DNA purification system (Promega).
Five individual clones representing each of the four (MS, TS,
ML, and TL) RT-PCR products were sequenced with SP6 and T7 promoters
and analyzed with the BLAST Program of the National Center for
Biotechnology Information. We found that all clones containing
the MS or TS cDNAs were identical in their sequence organizations
(data not shown). The clones containing the ML product also
exhibited identical sequences, and as expected, their 3' sequences
differed from the 3' sequences of the MS/TS cDNAs (data not
shown). However, the clones containing the TL cDNAs revealed
the presence of two different sets of sequences, one of which
represented the milk-borne virus RIII/Sa MMTV-2. We concluded
that the second set of sequence represented a third viral strain,
designated henceforth as RIII/Sa MMTV-3.

Sequence organization of the ORF of RIII/Sa MMTVs.
To determine the sequence of the ORF of the three RIII/Sa viruses,
cDNAs were made from milk and tumor tissue RNAs and amplified
with the primers FPC2 and RP (Fig.
1A). Gel analysis of the
cDNAs showed that both milk and tumor tissue produced approximately
1,300-bp (data not shown) products. Both the milk- and tumor
tissue-derived cDNA products were isolated and cloned. Since
the sizes of the ORF inserts of different viruses were not expected
to differ substantially on agarose gels, we analyzed several
clones by double digestion with
NotI (two sites in the vector)
and
HpaI. As expected, digestion with
NotI released an insert
that, upon digestion with
HpaI (this site is conserved in most
MMTV 3' ORF sequences and located 22 bp upstream from the primer
FPC1), produced two restriction fragments that differed in size
by approximately 50 bp (data not shown). This approach led us
to identify individual clones containing either the ORF of RIII/Sa
MMTV-1 or that of MMTV-2 (Fig.
1). Similar analyses of other
clones by
SacI and
EcoRI (this site is in the vector) digestion
resulted in the identification of clones containing either RIII/Sa
MMTV-2 or MMTV-3 (Fig.
1). The DNA clones of each viral strain
were sequenced (GenBank accession no.
AF 136898,
AF 136899,
and
AF 136900, respectively), and the resulting amino acid sequences
of their ORFs were determined and compared (Fig.
2). The results
show that RIII/Sa MMTV-1 and MMTV-2 were identical in their
Sag sequences up to amino acid (aa) 232, and only 2 aa differences
were detected between aa 231 and 280. However, within aa 1 to
280, RIII/Sa MMTV-3 differed by 22 or 24 aa. Importantly, the
three viruses showed significant variations in amino acids near
their C termini (from aa 281 to termination codons). These findings
led us to conclude unequivocally that, unlike other native mouse
strains, RIII/Sa mice express three specific strains of MMTVs.
It should be noted also that none of the RIII/Sa viruses resemble
the milk-borne BR6 MMTV of BR6 mice, which has frequently been
referred to as RIII MMTV (
41).
In order determine whether any of the three RIII/Sa ORFs represented
endogenous proviruses, primers (FP1, FP2, and FP3) specific
to each of the MMTV strains were designed (Fig.
1) from the
sequence data we obtained earlier by sequencing the three RT-PCR
products synthesized with the FPC1, FPC2, and RP primers (Fig.
1). As shown in Fig.
3A, FP3 and RP primers amplified an approximately
400-bp product from the liver DNA of RIII/Sa (lane 2) and C57BL
mice (lane 5), but not from liver DNA of RIIIS/J (lane 3) and
BALB/c mice (lane 4). In contrast, no amplification product
could be detected from any of the four mouse strains when FP1,
FP2, and RP primers were used (Fig.
3A, lanes 7 to 10 and 12
to 15). These observations clearly indicate that while RIII/Sa
MMTV-3 is an endogenous virus, both RIII/Sa MMTV-1 and MMTV-2
are exogenous viruses. In view of the fact that our RIII/Sa
MMTV-3 provirus is not present in BALB/c mice, which carry
Mtv-
6,
-
8, and -
9 proviral sequences, but is present in C57BL mice,
which carry
Mtv-
17, in addition to
Mtv-
8 and -
9 proviruses (
19),
we thought that RIII/Sa MMTV-3 most likely represented
Mtv-
17.
To support this view, we compared the pattern of MMTV LTR-specific
PvuII restriction fragments produced from the genomic DNA of
RIII/Sa mice with those produced from the genomic DNA of a number
of known
Mtv-
17-carrying mouse strains: DBA2/J, LP/J, AKR/J,
C58/J, C57BL/6J, and CBA/J. Because RIIIS/J, like RIII/Sa, is
a subline of RIII mice, we also included this mouse strain in
the study. Our rational for the choice of
PvuII over the traditional
EcoRI (
19) to analyze RIII/Sa mouse DNA was the realization
that in some mouse strains, such as RIII/Sa (
30),
EcoRI produces
cell-virus junction fragments of similar sizes from two or more
endogenous proviruses, and thus the identification of the virus
on the basis of fragment size becomes problematic (
11). As shown
in Fig.
3B, our results clearly show that
PvuII produced, from
the genomic DNA of RIII/Sa mice, a restriction fragment (lane
8), the size of which was similar to those
Mtv-
17-specific restriction
fragments expected to be produced from our control group of
mice (Fig.
3B, lanes 1 to 6). Interestingly RIIIS/J mice did
not show the presence of this provirus in their genome (Fig.
3B, lane 7). Since the C-terminal sequences of the RIII/Sa MMTV-3
Sag were found to be homologous to the published C-terminal
sequences of the Sag of
Mtv-
17 and
Mtv-
23 (see Fig.
6), we concluded
from the Southern hybridization data that the origin of RIII/Sa
MMTV-3 is
Mtv-
17. It should be pointed out that this virus may
not represent the so-called RIIIf MMTV, which is known to be
expressed only in older animals (
23).

Expression pattern of RIII/Sa MMTVs.
In view of the fact that MMTV expression in mammary glands and
mammary tumors is intimately linked to viral pathogenesis, and
because we found that RIII/Sa mice express three different strains
of MMTVs, we investigated the pattern of expression of these
viral strains in target tissues. Total or poly(A)-selected RNAs
obtained from early mammary tumors and mammary glands of both
lactating and nonlactating mice of various ages, as well as
milk samples collected from the stomachs of young pups, were
examined by RT-PCR using primers specific to each of the viral
strains. Representative data of our experiments are shown in
Fig.
4. Of the 12 mammary tumors tested, RIII/Sa MMTV-2 was
expressed in all tumors (for example, see lanes 2, 5, and 8
in Fig.
4A), whereas RIII/Sa MMTV-1 expression was not detected
in three tumors (examples of negative and positive results are
shown in lane 3 and in lanes 6 and 9, respectively). However,
both virus strains were found to be present in various amounts
in the milk and mammary glands of 12 young and 10 older mice
that we tested. During the course of this work, we were able
to examine only two mammary tumors of BALB/c mice that were
foster-nursed on a third-parity RIII/Sa mother. The tumors were
found to express both RIII/Sa MMTV-1 and MMTV-2 (Fig.
4A, lanes
11 and 12). This observation suggests that both MMTVs are infectious
to BALB/c mice and that at least one of the viruses must have
played a role in tumor development. Interestingly, we could
not detect by RT-PCR the presence of RIII/Sa MMTV-1- or MMTV-2
ORF-specific sequences in mammary glands and milk of RIII/SJ
mice (data not shown). As a matter of fact, no MMTV RNA was
detected in the milk of RIII/SJ mice by Northern blotting (Fig.
4F). This finding is consistent with the observation made by
the Jackson laboratory that RIIIS/J mice do not develop early
mammary tumors (
www.informatics.jax.org/menus/strain-menu.html).
It is difficult to explain why RIIIS/J mice are currently free
of any exogenous MMTV, since they were known to express milk-borne
MMTV as early as 1962 and as late as 1995 (
1,
9,
33,
37). The
Jackson Laboratory derived the RIIIS/J mouse strain by cross-breeding
between an exogenous MMTV-expressing parental RIII female mouse
and a male SEC/1ReJ mouse (
34), and thus MMTV production should
not have been affected in RIIIS/J mice. We have observed that
low-parity RIII/Sa mothers express much smaller amounts of MMTV
particles than high-parity mothers, and thus we use pups from
high parity mothers (3rd parity or more) for breeding so that
the mice of succeeding generations maintain high virus production.
The tendency of RIII mice to lose MMTV production had been noted
as early as 1962 (
1). We believe that RIIIS/J mice lost milk-borne
MMTV because the Jackson Laboratory may not have always used
pups from high-parity mothers for routine breeding.
With regard to the expression of RIII/Sa MMTV-3 (
Mtv-
17) in
normal tissues of RIII/Sa mice, RT-PCRs carried out with
Mtv-
17 ORF-specific primers, showed the synthesis of specific cDNAs
from RNA prepared from nonlactating or lactating mammary glands
(Fig.
4B, lanes 1 to 3), mammary tumors that were used as controls
(Fig.
4B, lanes 4 and 5), and from some spleens (Fig.
4B, cDNA+,
lane 8; cDNA-, lane 9). Lactating mammary glands of C57BL/10J
mice were also positive for the ORF transcript (Fig.
4B, lane
6). As anticipated, RIIIS/J mice were negative for the expression
of RIII/Sa MMTV-3 ORF-specific transcript in their mammary glands
(Fig.
4B, lane 7). None of the RNA samples shown in Fig.
4B when similarly tested in the absence of RT, produced any cDNA(Fig.
4C), indicating that our positive RT-PCR results were the products
of RNA instead of possible contaminating genomic DNA. The 10
RNA samples used in Fig.
4B were also subjected to RT-PCR amplification
with a primer set that represented a segment of the ORF common
to all endogenous and exogenous MMTVs. The results show that
all samples, including RIIIS/J, produced cDNA (Fig.
4D), suggesting
that those tissues that were negative for
Mtv-
17 ORF do express
other endogenous MMTV ORF. RT-PCR analyses showed that the milk
pellets obtained from the stomachs of RIII/Sa mouse pups (Fig.
4E, lanes 1 to 5 and 7), but not the milk pellets from the pups
of C57BL mice, that express
Mtv-
17 ORF (for example, see Fig.
4E, lane 6), contained ORF RNA specific to RIII/Sa MMTV-3. Taken
together, our results suggest that, in general, RIII/Sa mice
express two strains of exogenous infectious MMTVs and the transcript
of
Mtv-
17. We do not know how
Mtv-
17 expression is linked to
mammary tumorigenesis in RIII/Sa mice. It is possible that (i)
Mtv-
17 may be expressed as a functional provirus and produce
infectious virus particles like
Mtv-
1,
Mtv-
2, and
Mtv-
48; or
(ii) RIII/Sa MMTV-3 may be a recombinant virus involving
Mtv-
17 Sag and RIII/Sa MMTV-1 and/or MMTV-2. Further work is needed
to know the biological significance of
Mtv-
17 Sag expression
in RIII/Sa mice.

int mutation.
The hallmark of MMTV-induced mammary tumorigenesis is the activation
of a number of oncogenes, primarily
int-
1/
Wnt-
1 and
int-2/
Fgf 3 oncogenes, as a consequence of proviral integration in the
vicinity of the target genes. Since we found that three different
strains of MMTVs are expressed in mammary tumors of RIII/Sa
mice, we sought to determine a priori which of the viruses could
be involved in mammary tumor development, because of the fact
that the presence of different types of virions in a tumor does
not necessarily imply that each virus type caused an insertion
mutation of
ints. Further, there is some evidence that an infectious
virus, such as MMTV-SW, may not always induce mammary tumors
in its natural host (
16). Our strategy to characterize the oncogenic
MMTVs was to clone MMTV
int-
1/
Wnt-
1 or MMTV
int-2/
Fgf 3 junction
fragments and determine the sequences of the viral LTR ORF.
Genomic DNA from 12 mammary tumors of RIII/Sa mice were prepared,
digested with
BglII or
EcoRI, and analyzed by Southern hybridization
with
int-1/
Wnt-
1- or
int-
2/
Fgf3-specific probes. Results from
7 of the 12 tumors tested are shown in Fig.
5C to E. Two of
the 12 tumors (tumors 2 and 6) showed rearranged restriction
fragments with hybridization intensities similar to those of
the unrearranged fragments (Fig.
5C, lane 6, and E, lane 2).
The sizes of the MMTV
int-
1/
Wnt-
1 and MMTV
int-2/
Fgf3 junction
fragments were 8.1 and 5.2 kb, respectively. Two other tumors
also produced rearranged restriction fragments that hybridized
poorly with the probes (arrows in Fig.
5C, lane 1, and E, lane
3). In order to determine the orientation of proviral integration
in these tumors,
int-specific probes were stripped off the filter
and rehybridized with an MMTV
env or LTR probe (data not shown).
These experiments allowed us to know the orientations of proviral
integrations associated with the 8.1-kb (
BglII/
int-1C) and 5.2-kb
(
EcoRI/
int-2S) junction fragments (Fig.
5B). It should be noted
that the orientation of proviral integration in one of the tumors
within the
int-1/
Wnt-
1 locus is unusual (Fig.
5B), since the
transcriptional orientation of MMTV provirus in most mammary
tumors, except in some rare tumors, has been found to be away
from the transcritional orientations of both
int-
1/
Wnt-
1 and
int-
2/
Fgf3 (
4).
To evaluate which of the three RIII/Sa MMTVs caused insertional
mutation in tumors 2 and 6, the 8.1- and 5.2-kb bands were isolated
from preparative agarose gels by electroelution, concentrated
by extraction with 2-butanol/phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitation,
and further purified by passage through an Elutip-d column (
29).
DNA was ligated to pGEM-3z Vector (Promega) at the
BamHI or
EcoRI cloning sites according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Clones containing inserts were selected by blue/white color
screening, and amplified DNA was extracted and analyzed by Southern
blotting with MMTV LTR and
Wnt-
1C or
int-2/
Fgf3-
2S probes. It
was found that the cloned 8.1- and 5.2-kb fragments contained
LTR-specific sequences as expected (data not shown). The ORF-specific
sequences associated with the clones were PCR amplified with
the primers FPC1 and RP (Fig.
1), cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector
Systems II, and sequenced. RIII/Sa MMTV-2 was identified to
be the virus that was associated with both junction fragments
and thus was most likely to have induced both tumors. One recent
study has determined the Sag sequence of a provirus (GenBank
accession no.
AF 071010) that was cloned from the mammary tumor
of an RIII/Sa mouse (
28). The Sag of this virus bears very close
homology to the Sag of RIII/Sa MMTV-2. Taken together, it appears
that RIII/Sa MMTV-2 may be a major determinant for mammary tumorigenesis
in RIII/Sa mice. A large panel of RIII/Sa mammary tumors must
be analyzed to confirm this and to determine whether RIII/Sa
MMTV-1 and/or MMTV-3 participates in the activation of some
ints. Such a study however, presents considerable challenges,
but may provide valuable information on the role of multiple
MMTVs in mammary tumor development not only in RIII/Sa mice
but also in other mouse models.

Identity of RIII/Sa MMTV Sags with the Sags of other MMTVs.
Sequence analyses of the Sags of some 35 other endogenous and
exogenous MMTVs have resulted in the groupings of most MMTV
strains into seven major families on the basis of the composition
of their carboxyl-terminal amino acids (
41). Alignment of the
sequences of the 44 C-terminal amino acids of the RIII/Sa MMTV-1
Sag with the known sequences of the C termini of other MMTV
Sags revealed that this virus belongs to a group of MMTVs with
T-CR Vß-2 specificity: BALB2, C4,
Mtv-DDO, II-TES
2, CS/
Mtv-
48, BALB/cV, and C3H-K (Fig.
6). Despite this Vß-2
specificity, these viruses show diverse biological characteristics.
For example, the origin of C3H-K virus is the kidney tumor of
a BALB/cfC3H mouse, yet unlike C3H MMTV, it does not cause mammary
tumors (
32,
39). The Sag sequences of this virus differ significantly
from that of C3H MMTV, but are almost identical to the Sag sequences
of oncogenic BALB2 and BALB/cV MMTVs. The host animals of the
BALB2, C4, BALB/cV, and C3H-K viruses are BALB/c mice (
7,
18,
32,
38,
39). However, most colonies of BALB/c mice are known
to be free of exogenous virus (
21,
23,
24), but are highly susceptible
to infection by various exogenous MMTV strains (
23), including
RIII/Sa MMTV-1 (Fig.
4A; lanes 11 and 12). Three endogenous
proviruses,
Mtv-DDO, CS/
Mtv-
48, and CS/
Mtv-
51, also share the
same Vß-2 specificity with the other exogenous viruses
of this group, but only CS/
Mtv-
48 has been shown to be infectious
to BALB/c mice (
17,
26).
The RIII/Sa MMTV-2 virus shares very close homology in the C terminus of the Sags of three other biologically different MMTV strains, FM, SHN, and Mtv-RCS (20, 35, 42) (Fig. 6). Both SHN and FM are tumorigenic, but the FM virus is exogenous, while the SHN virus is an infectious analogue of an endogenous provirus, Mtv-4. Similar to SHN, Mtv-RCS is an endogenous virus, but unlike SHN, Mtv-RCS does not produce infectious virus particles, although its ORF is highly expressed in spontaneously developed reticular cell sarcomas (RCS) of SJL mice (35). It is quite striking that the TCR Vß specificity of Mtv-RCS virus differs not only from the SHN and FM viruses, but the other 33 different MMTV strains (41); Mtv-RCS Sag is reactive only to Vß-16 T cells. While the Sag of SHN-MMTV interacts with Vß-7-, Vß-8.1-, Vß-8.2-, and Vß-8.3-specific T cells, FM virus infection causes deletion of Vß-2, Vß-6, Vß-8.1, Vß-8.2, Vß-8.3, and Vß-14. Thus the FM virus shares Vß-14 specificity with some highly oncogenic GR, C3H, and BR6 MMTVs, as well as with other less-oncogenic viruses, despite the fact that the extreme C-terminal Sag sequences of FM virus are quite different from the sequences of the respective Vß-2- and Vß-14-specific viruses. It appears, therefore, that similarity in amino acid sequences of the ORF or TCR Vß specificity among different MMTVs may not be a good predictor of their pathobiology. We have recently found that infection from milk-borne RIII/Sa MMTVs leads to the deletion of both Vß-2- and Vß-8-specific T cells (35a). Based on the homology of Sags, we predict that RIII/Sa MMTV-1 and MMTV-2 would be specific for TCR Vß-2 and Vß-8, respectively. Further studies involving the cloning of individual RIII/Sa MMTV strains and testing their TCR Vß specificity are needed to confirm our prediction. The availability of such cloned viruses should also allow us to determine directly the relative effectiveness of these viruses in mammary tumor development.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The sequences portrayed in Fig.
2 have been reported to GenBank
under accession no.
AF136898,
AF136899, and
AF136900.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was partially supported by grants from the American
Cancer Society (N.H.S.) and the National Institutes of Health
(T.A.G).
We thank R.-B. Markowitz for editorial assistance.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912. Phone: (706) 721-7657. Fax: (706) 721-7915. E-mail:
nsarkar{at}mail.mcg.edu.

Present address: Center for Liver Diseases, Owaisi Hospital and Research Center, Kanchanbagh, Hyderabad-500058, India. 

REFERENCES
1 - Andervont, H. B., and T. B. Dunn. 1962. Studies of the mammary tumor agent of strain RIII mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 28:159-185.
2 - Bittner, J. J. 1936. Some possible effects of nursing on the mammary gland tumor incidence in mice. Science 84:162-169.[Free Full Text]
3 - Choi, Y., J. W. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1991. A superantigen encoded in the open reading frame of the long terminal repeat of the mouse mammary tumor virus. Nature 350:203-207.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Dickson, C. 1987. Molecular aspects of mouse mammary tumor virus biology. Int. Rev. Cytol. 108:119-147.[Medline]
5 - Dickson, C., R. Smith, S. Brookes, and G. Peters. 1984. Tumorigenesis by mouse mammary tumor virus: proviral activation of a cellular gene in the common integration region int-2. Cell 37:529-536.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Dmochowski, L., C. D. Haagensen, and D. H. Moore. 1955. Studies of sections of normal and malignant cells of high- and low-cancer strain mice by means of electron microscopy. Acta Unio Int. Contra Cancrum 11:640-645.
7 - Drohan, W., Y. A. Teramoto, D. Medina, and J. Schlom. 1981. Isolation and characterization of a new mouse mammary tumor virus from BALB/c mice. Virology 114:175-186.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Dyson, P. J., A. M. Knight, S. Fairchild, E. Simpson, and K. Tomonari. 1991. Genes encoding ligands for deletion of Vß11 T cells cosegregate with mammary tumor virus genomes. Nature 349:531-533.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Etkind, P. R., P. Szabo, and N. H. Sarkar. 1982. Restriction endonuclease mapping of the proviral DNA of the exogenous RIII murine mammary tumor virus. J. Virol. 41:855-867.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Foulds, L. 1949. Mammary tumors in hybrid mice: the presence and transmission of the mammary tumor agent. Br. J. Cancer 3:230-239.
11 - Frankel, W. N., C. Rudy, J. M. Coffin, and B. T. Huber. 1991. Linkage of Mls genes to endogenous mouse mammary tumor viruses of inbred mice. Nature 349:526-529.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Gallahan, D., and R. Callahan. 1987. Mammary tumorigenesis in feral mice: identification of new int locus in mouse mammary tumor virus (Czech II)-induced mammary tumors. J. Virol. 61:66-74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Golovkina, T. V., A. B. Jaffe, and S. R. Ross. 1994. Coexpression of exogenous and endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus RNA in vivo results in viral recombination and broadens the virus host range. J. Virol. 68:5019-5026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Golovkina, T. V., I. Piazzon, I. Nepomnaschy, V. Buggiano, M. de Olano Vela, and S. R. Ross. 1997. Generation of a tumorigenic milk-borne mouse mammary tumor virus by recombination between endogenous and exogenous viruses. J. Virol. 71:3895-3903.[Abstract]
15 - Golovkina, T. V., O. Prakash, and S. Ross. 1966. Endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus Mtv-17 is involved in Mtv-2 induced tumorigenesis in GR mice. Virology 218:14-22.
16 - Held, W., A. N. Shakhov, G., Waanders, L. Scarpellino, R. Luethy, J. P. Karehenbuhl, H. R. MacDonald, and H. Acha-Orbea. 1992. An exogenous mouse mammary tumor virus with properties of Mls-1a(Mtv-17). J. Exp. Med. 175:1623-1633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Jouvin-Marche, E., P. N. Marche, A. Six, C. Liebe-Gris, D. Voegtle, and P.-A. Cazenave. 1993. Identification of an endogenous mammary tumor virus involved in the clonal deletion of Vß 2 T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:2758-2764.[Medline]
18 - Kang, J., T. Schwegel, and J. E. Knepper. 1993. Sequence between the long terminal repeat coding regions of mammary-tumorigenic BALB/cV and renal-tumorigenic C3H-K strains of mouse mammary tumor virus. Virology 196:303-308.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Kozak, C., G. Peters, R. Pauley, V. Morris, R. Michalides, J. Dudley, M. Green, M. Davisson, O. Prakash, A. Vaidya, J. Hilgers, A. Verstraeten, N. Hynes, H. Diggelmann, D. Patterson, J. C. Cohen, C. Dickson, N. Sarkar, R. Nusse, H. Varmus, and R. Callahan. 1987. A standardized nomenclature for endogenous mouse mammary tumor viruses. J. Virol. 61:1651-1654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Luther, S., A. N. Shakhov, I. Xenarios, S. Haga, S. Imai, and H. Acha-Orbea. 1994. New infectious mouse mammary tumor virus superantigen with Vß-specificity identical to staphylococcal enterotoxin B (ESB). Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1757-1764.[Medline]
21 - Marcus, S. L., S. W. Smith, and N. H. Sarkar. 1981. Quantitation of murine mammary tumor virus-related RNA in mammary tissues of low- and high-mammary-tumor-incidence mouse strains. J. Virol. 40:87-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Marrack, P., E. Kushnir, and J. Kappler. 1991. A maternally inherited superantigen encoded by a mammary tumor virus. Nature 349:524-526.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Moore, D. H., C. A. Long, A. B. Vaidya, J. B. Sheffield, A. S. Dion, and E. Y. Lasfargues. 1979. Mammary tumor viruses. Adv. Cancer Res. 29:347-418.[Medline]
24 - Moore, D. H., N. H. Sarkar, J. A. Holben, and J. B. Sheffield. 1979. Idiopathic mammary tumors in BALB/c mice. Int. J. Cancer 23:713-717.[Medline]
25 - Moore, R., M. Dixon, R. Smith, G. Peters, and C. Dickson. 1987. Complete nucleotide sequence of a milk-transmitted mouse mammary tumor virus: two frameshift suppression events are required for translation of gag and pol. J. Virol. 61:480-490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Niimi, N., W. Wajjwalku, Y. Ando, N. Nakamura, M. Ueda, and Y. Yoshikai. 1995. A novel Vß 2-specific endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus which is capable of producing a milk-borne exogenous virus. J. Virol. 69:7269-7273.[Abstract]
27 - Nusse, R., and H. E. Varmus. 1982. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell 31:99-109.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Popken-Harris, P., L. Pliml, and L. Harris. 2001. Sequence and genetic analyses of the 3' terminus and integration sites of the RIII/Sa mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) exogenous provirus. Virus Genes 23:35-43.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 - Prakash, O., C. Kozak, and N. H. Sarkar. 1985. Molecular cloning, characterization, and genetic mapping of an endogenous murine mammary tumor virus proviral unit I of C3H/He mice. J. Virol. 54:285-294.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30 - Sarkar, N. H. 1995. Clonal variations among multiple primary mammary tumors and within a tumor of individual mice: insertion mutations of int oncogenes. Virology 212:490-499.[CrossRef][Medline]
31 - Sarkar, N. H., and D. H. Moore. 1970. Electron microscopy of the nucleic acid of mouse mammary tumor virus. J. Virol. 5:230-236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - Seman, G., and L. Dmochowski. 1973. Viropexis of type B particles in reticular cell sarcoma of RIII/Om strain mice. Cancer Res. 33:1238-1246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33 - Shakhov, A. N., H. Wang, H. Acha-Orbea, R. J. Pauley, and W.-Z. Wei. 1993. A new infectious mammary tumor virus in the milk of mice implanted with C4 hyperplastic alveolar nodules. Eur. J. Immunol. 23:2765-6569.[Medline]
34 - Staats, J. 1976. Standard nomenclature for inbred strains of mice. Sixth listing. Cancer Res. 36:4333-4341.
35 - Tsiagbe, V. K., T. Yashimoto, T. J. Asakawa, S. Y. Cho, D. Meruelo, and G. J. Thorbecke. 1993. Linkage of superantigen-like stimulation of syngeneic T cells in a mouse model of follicular center B cell lymphoma to transcription of endogenous mouse mammary tumor virus. EMBO J. 12:2313-2320.[Medline]
35 - Uz-Zaman, T., L. Ignatowicz, and N. H. Sarkar. 2003. Mouse mammary tumor viruses expressed by RIII/Sa mice with a high incidence of mammary tumors interact with the Vß-2 and Vß-8-specific T cells during viral infection. Virology 314:294-304.[CrossRef][Medline]
36 - Varmus, H. E., J. M. Bishop, R. C. Nowinski, and N. H. Sarkar. 1972. Mammary tumor virus specific nucleotide sequences in mouse DNA. Nature 238:189-191.
37 - Wajjwalku, W., Y. Ando, N. Nimmi, and Y. Yoshikai. 1995. A novel exogenous mammary tumor virus encoding MHC class II H-2E-independent superantigen specific for T-cr-Vß 14. Immunogenetics 41:156-158.[Medline]
38 - Wei, W.-Z., R. Fiscor-Jacobs, S. J. Tsai, and R. Pauley. 1991. Elimination of a Vß-2 bearing T-cells in BALB/c mice transplanted with syngeneic preneoplastic and neoplastic mammary lesions. Cancer Res. 51:3331-3333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39 - Wellinger, R. J., M. Garcia, A. Vessaz, and H. Diggelmann. 1986. Exogenous mouse mammary tumor virus proviral DNA isolated from a kidney adenocarcinoma cell line contains alteration in the U3 region of the long terminal repeat. J. Virol. 60:1-11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40 - Woodland, D. L., M. P. Happ, K. J. Gollub, and E. Palmer. 1991. An endogenous retrovirus mediating deletion of
ß T cells? Nature 349:529-531.[CrossRef][Medline]
41 - Wrona, T. J., M. Lozano, A. A. Binhazim, and J. P. Dudley. 1998. Mutational and functional analysis of the C-terminal region of the C3H mouse mammary tumor virus superantigen. J. Virol. 72:4746-4755.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42 - Yoshimoto, T., H. Nagase, H. Nakano, A. Matsuzawa, and H. Nariuchi. 1994. A Vß8.2-specific superantigen from exogenous mouse mammary tumor virus carried by FM mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1612-1694.[Medline]
Journal of Virology, January 2004, p. 1055-1062, Vol. 78, No. 2
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.2.1055-1062.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Etkind, P. R., Stewart, A. F. R., Dorai, T., Purcell, D. J., Wiernik, P. H.
(2004). Clonal Isolation of Different Strains of Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus-Like DNA Sequences from Both the Breast Tumors and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas of Individual Patients Diagnosed with Both Malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res.
10: 5656-5664
[Abstract]
[Full Text]