Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2004, p. 9854-9861, Vol. 78, No. 18
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.18.9854-9861.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Vincent Geenen,2 Didier Hober,3* and Cheryl A. Stoddart1
Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology, University of California, San Francisco, California,1 Center of Immunology, Institute of Pathology, University of Liege, Liege-Sart-Tilman, Belgium,2 UPRES EA3610 Pathogenèse Virale du Diabète de Type 1, Faculté de Médecine et Service de Virologie, Université Lille 2, CHRU, Lille, France3
Received 26 February 2004/ Accepted 17 May 2004
|
|
|---|
106 50% tissue culture infective doses/ml), and in flow-sorted thymocyte populations for 7 days after inoculation. Cortical CD4+ CD8+ thymocytes were found to be the principal targets of infection. Inoculation of human FTOC with CVB4 E2 led to a marked and progressive depletion of immature thymocytes (CD4+ CD8+ cells) with no enhancement of Annexin V-positive cells. CVB4 E2 replication caused significant major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I upregulation on these cells. MHC class I upregulation was correlated with positive- and negative-strand RNA quantitative detection and the release of infectious particles. In addition, chloroquine treatment of FTOC and single-thymocyte suspensions suggested that MHC class I upregulation on thymocytes was the result of direct infection rather than caused by production of soluble factors such as alpha interferon. Thus, CVB4 E2 can infect human fetal thymocytes, which subsequently results in quantitative and qualitative abnormalities of these cells. |
|
|---|
In concert with individual genetic predisposition, type 1 diabetes is associated with a loss or absence of immune self-tolerance at central and peripheral levels (41). Self-tolerance is initiated in the thymus during T-cell ontogeny (13). During thymocyte maturation, interactions between peptide-displaying major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II and randomly rearranged T-cell receptors lead to the development of MHC-restricted immune responses by positive selection and to the establishment of central T-cell tolerance by negative selection. MHC class I molecules are expressed at different levels on thymocyte subpopulations during T-cell development with higher expression on mature cells (3, 29). T-cell-positive and -negative selections depend on complex interactions between thymocytes and a variety of thymic stromal cells such as thymic epithelial cells (TEC). Thus, the thymic microenvironment is essential for generation of a functionally diverse T-cell repertoire that is nevertheless self-tolerant (23).
The association between CVB4 infection and its consequences on thymic microenvironment has not been extensively studied. Previous studies of CVB4 infection of lymphoid targets have been restricted to human T-cell lines and monocytes (16, 34) or to other type B coxsackieviruses, e.g., CVB3 (24, 38). Recently, we reported that CVB4 JVB (a laboratory reference strain) and CVB4 E2 persistently infect human TEC in vitro, and we hypothesized that this persistence could interfere with thymus function and contribute to the development of autoimmunity (5). Congenital rubella syndrome provides an example of in utero acquired infection causing type 1 diabetes (14); therefore, it has been suggested that fetal viral infections may be causally related to type 1 diabetes (10). Otonkoski et al. detected postnatally several types of diabetes-associated autoantibodies in an infant infected in utero by an enterovirus, which suggests that enterovirus infections in utero may induce ß-cell autoimmunity (36). A vertical transmission of coxsackievirus B, associated with the infection of fetal thymus, has been observed (19, 33). Moreover, epidemiological studies showed that CVB4 infection during pregnancy was a risk factor for childhood-onset type 1 diabetes (11, 18). Here, we used explanted fetal thymus organ cultures (FTOC) to investigate CVB4 E2 infection in intact human thymus and to establish whether CVB4 E2 was able to infect the cellular components of the human thymus and what effects such an infection could have on those cells.
|
|
|---|
FTOC inoculation.
Human fetal thymi (Advanced Bioscience Resources, Alameda, Calif.) were dissected into small pieces of ca. 6 x 106 cells (this number represents an average of cell counts for several FTOC pieces) with sterile scalpels, as described previously (20), and directly transferred into CVB4 E2 or HIV-1 Ba-L stocks at multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of 0.05 to 0.005 for 4 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Pieces were then transferred onto sterile filters (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) placed on Gelfoam (Pharmacia-Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Calif.) rafts in 700 µl of Yssel's medium (Gemini Bio-Products, Calabasas, Calif.) in 24-well plates. CVB4-infected FTOC were incubated 7 days, and the medium was changed every 3 days. Cultures were treated with 10 µM chloroquine diphosphate salt (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), lamivudine (McKesson, Denver, Colo.) at 5 µM, and alpha-2b interferon (IFN-
2b; Intron A; Schering, Kenilworth, N.J.) were added at 1,000 IU/ml. At the termination of culture, individual thymus pieces were dispersed, washed, and stained for CD4, CD8, 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.), Annexin V, and MHC class I and then analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
Neutralizing experiments.
To neutralize CVB4, virus stocks were treated for 90 min at 37°C with a neutralizing anti-CVB4 polyclonal rabbit antibody at a dilution of 1:10 (Eurobio, Les Ulis, France) before inoculation of the FTOC. Treatment of FTOC with IFN-
-neutralizing polyclonal rabbit and sheep antibodies (BioSource International, Camarillo, Calif.) was performed before, during, and after FTOC inoculation. FTOC were preincubated 2 h at 37°C with saturating amounts of neutralizing antibodies (1,000 neutralizing U/ml); inoculated with CVB4 E2, CVB4 JBV, or HIV-1 Ba-L in the presence of the antibodies; and incubated for 7 days. Every 3 days, medium containing fresh antibodies was replaced. Importantly, the neutralizing polyclonal sheep anti-IFN-
antibody binds with high avidity to IFN-
A, IFN-
2, and IFN-
G and with moderate avidity to IFN-
A/D, IFN-
F, IFN-
K, and IFN-
WA. The neutralizing polyclonal rabbit antibody binds strongly to IFN-
A/D, IFN-
A, and IFN-
K and moderately to IFN-
D (according to the manufacturer).
FACS staining and analysis.
Dispersed thymocytes from FTOC were washed, pelleted, and resuspended in 50 µl of monoclonal antibodies and incubated at 4°C for 30 min. After incubation, cells were rinsed, pelleted, and resuspended in 100 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-2% FCS for FACS analysis. Intracellular staining for cytokeratin was performed as follows. After initial staining with antibodies to surface markers, cells were rinsed and pelleted. Pellets were resuspended in 200 µl of 1% paraformaldehyde, 1 mg of human gamma globulin/ml, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells were incubated at room temperature for 10 min and then rinsed twice and pelleted. Pellets were then stained intracellularly with anti-cytokeratin antibody diluted in PBS-2% FCS for 20 min at 4°C. After incubation, cells were rinsed, pelleted, and resuspended in 100 µl of PBS-2% FCS for FACS analysis. Four-color FACS staining was performed with the indicated combinations of the following antibodies to CD4-allophycocyanin (APC) (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.); CD8-peridinin chlorophyll protein (PerCP) and CD3-phycoerythrin (PE) (both from BD Bioscience, San Jose, Calif.); HLA-A, -B, and -C (pan-MHC class I, W6/32 clone)-PE (Dako, Carpinteria, Calif.); cytokeratin-fluorescein isothiocyanate (cytokeratin-FITC, clone J1B3; Immunotech, Marseille, France); CD11c-APC and CD8
-PerCP (both from BD Bioscience); and blood dendritic cell A-2-APC (BDCA-2; Miltenyi Biotech, Auburn, Calif.). Viability was assessed by staining with 7-AAD. Five-color FACS staining was performed with the indicated combinations of the antibodies to CD4-APC; CD8-Cascade Blue (a gift of Marty Bigos); Annexin V-FITC (Caltag); HLA-A-, HLA-B-, and HLA-C-PE (Dako); and 7-AAD. Samples were analyzed immediately after staining on a FACSCalibur or FACSDiVa (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, Calif.) by using FlowJo version 3.6.1 software (Tree Star, Inc., Stanford, Calif.).
Thymocyte sorting.
DP thymocytes were isolated with an anti-FITC Multisort kit (Miltenyi), CD4-FITC (BD Bioscience), and CD8 microbeads (Miltenyi). The purity was checked by FACS before CVB4 infection and was always
98%. For cell sorting, unfixed cells were stained as for FACS analysis with CD3-PE, CD4-APC, and CD8-FITC (Becton Dickinson) and then sorted into three populations by using a FACSVantage (Becton Dickinson): CD3+/ CD4+ CD8+ (DP), CD3+ CD4+ CD8 (SP4), and CD3+ CD4 CD8+ (SP8). Cells were directly sorted into lysis buffer and frozen at 80°C for RNA extraction. Gating for SP4 and SP8 was based on high expression of CD3.
ELISA.
Conditioned media from CVB4- and HIV-1-infected FTOC were collected at various times after inoculation and analyzed for IFN-
, IFN-ß, IFN-
, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (BioSource). The IFN-
ELISA detects IFN-
A, IFN-
2, IFN-
A/D, IFN-
D, IFN-
K, and IFN-
4b.
Quantitative RT-PCR for CVB4 E2. CVB4 E2 positive- and negative-strand RNA in FTOC were quantitated by two-step quantitative RT-PCR by using the TaqMan fluorogenic detection system with AmpliTaq Gold reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Briefly, total RNA was extracted with RNeasy minikit (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.) and resuspended in water according to the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was measured in a quantitative RT-PCR for rRNA expression with the TaqMan rRNA control reagent (Applied Biosystems). Positive- and negative-strand-specific RT was carried out with 10 ng of rRNA and either the reverse or the forward primer at 48°C for 30 min. PCR was performed with universal cycle conditions (10 min at 95°C, 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, and 1 min at 60°C) on an ABI Prism 7700 sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). The following primers, used to detect CVB4 E2 RNA, were located within the enterovirus 5'-nontranslated region, which is highly conserved among enterovirus serotypes: CVB4 forward (5'-GTA GTC CTC CGG CCC CT) and CVB4 reverse (5'-AAT TGT CAC CAT AAG CAG CCA). The sequence of the CVB4 probe was 5'-VIC-ATG CGG CTA ATC CTA ACT GCG GAG-TAMRA (Applied Biosystems). The RNA copy number in each sample was determined by a standard curve generated from increasing copy number of a synthetic transcript corresponding to 435 nt of the CVB4 E2 genome. Briefly, 435 nt within the enterovirus 5'-nontranslated region were reverse transcribed and amplified with primers described previously (31). The PCR product was cloned in pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.), sequenced, and subcloned to two different T7 promoter-containing pBluescript II KS(+) vector to obtain a positive and a negative strain after in vitro transcription. Sense and antisense synthetic RNA generated with a T7 Megascript RNA transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, Tex.) were measured by spectrophotometry and diluted to obtain a standard curve. Accurate quantification of 101 to 106 RNA copies was achieved by use of a single amplification reaction, and CVB4 quantitative RT-PCR is more sensitive than previously reported enterovirus RT-PCR (31). The absence of contaminating DNA from plasmid in standards and genomic DNA in samples was checked by RT-PCR without the reverse transcriptase enzyme. Primers and probe pairs were designed with PrimerExpress software, and the data were analyzed with Sequence Detector version 1.6.3 (both from Perkin-Elmer, Boston, Mass.).
Statistical analyses. Statistical analyses were performed by using an unpaired Student t test and the Spearman correlation test (StatView 5.0; Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, Calif.). The data are expressed as means ± the standard deviation (SD) for three to five independent experiments performed in triplicate.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. CVB4 E2 replicates in human thymus. The production of positive-strand (A) and negative-strand (B) viral RNA and infectious virus (C) by CVB4-infected FTOC is shown. , P < 0.001 (n = 3).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Cellular tropism of CVB4 E2 in human thymocytesa
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. CVB4 E2 infection is cytopathic in human thymus. (A and B) Staining of thymocytes with 7-AAD at 1, 5, and 7 days after CVB4 E2 inoculation of FTOC (A) and staining with 7-AAD and Annexin V 7 days after inoculation (B). , P < 0.001 versus mock-infected FTOC (n = 3).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effects of CVB4 E2 on thymocyte subpopulationsa
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. CVB4 E2 infection upregulates MHC class I. (A and B) MHC class I mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of DP thymocytes 7 days after inoculation with CVB4 E2 in the absence (A) or presence (B) of CVB4-neutralizing antiserum. Representative data from five experiments are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Positive correlation between MHC class I upregulation and CVB4 E2 replication in human thymus. (A to C) MHC class I mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on DP thymocytes versus production of positive-strand (A) and negative-strand (B) CVB4 E2 RNA and infectious virus (C) in FTOC 7 days after CVB4 inoculation.
|
.
Since IFN-
modulates expression of MHC class I molecules in a variety of cell types (15, 21) and after HIV-1 infection of human thymus (20), we reasoned that MHC class I upregulation in CVB4-infected thymus was induced by this cytokine. To detect IFN-
, we harvested supernatants from CVB4 E2- and HIV-1 Ba-L-infected FTOC and performed ELISA for IFN-
. IFN-
was not detected in FTOC infected with CVB4 E2 (Fig. 5A) but was present at high levels in medium from HIV-1 Ba-L-infected FTOC (P < 0.001). No IFN-ß or IFN-
was detected in medium from either CVB4 E2- or HIV-1-infected FTOC (data not shown). Since IFN-
has numerous subtypes that could be undetected by ELISA, FTOC were treated with two neutralizing polyclonal antibodies against different IFN-
subtypes before, during, and after virus inoculation. Upregulation of MHC class I was unaffected by treatment of CVB4 E2-infected FTOC with sheep and rabbit antibodies (Fig. 5B), whereas treatment with neutralizing anti-IFN-
antibodies blocked MHC class I upregulation in HIV-1 Ba-L-infected FTOC (P < 0.001) (Fig. 5C). Importantly, treatment with antibodies did not affect virus replication since antibody-treated CVB4 E2- and HIV-1-infected FTOC were productively infected by each virus: CVB4 E2 titers in antibody-treated FTOC supernatants were similar to antibody-untreated CVB4 E2-infected FTOC supernatants [106.1 50% tissue culture infective doses per ml; data not shown]. These data suggest that IFNs do not mediate MHC class I upregulation on thymocytes in CVB4 E2-infected thymus.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. (A) CVB4 E2-mediated MHC class I upregulation is independent of IFN- . IFN- was not detected in supernatants from CVB4 E2- and mock-infected FTOC but was detected after HIV-1 Ba-L infection. (B and C) MHC class I upregulation was not blocked by treatment of CVB4 E2-infected FTOC with rabbit [(1)] and sheep [(2)] polyclonal neutralizing anti-IFN- antisera (B) but was completely blocked in HIV-1-Ba-L-infected FTOC (C). , P < 0.001 versus mock-infected cells (n = 5). MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
|
was added showed significant MHC class I upregulation, indicating that chloroquine treatment by itself did not downregulate MHC class I expression (data not shown). In dose-response experiments, the magnitude of MHC class I upregulation was dependent on the MOI (Fig. 6B), further suggesting that CVB4 E2-induced MHC class I upregulation depends on direct infection.
![]() View larger version (47K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. CVB4 E2-mediated MHC class I upregulation is the result of direct infection of DP. (A) Chloroquine prevents MHC class I upregulation on DP thymocytes from FTOC inoculated with conditioned medium from CVB4 E2-infected FTOC, whereas lamivudine does not prevent MHC class I upregulation on DP from HIV-1 Ba-L-infected FTOC. The dashed line represents the mean MHC class I expression in mock-infected samples (n = 3). (B) MHC class I upregulation increases with MOI. , P < 0.001; , P < 0.01 (versus mock-infected cells [n = 3]). (C) Significant MHC class I upregulation on purified DP thymocytes infected with CVB4 E2. The treatment of infected cells with chloroquine inhibited MHC class I upregulation. Representative stains for MHC class I are shown (n = 3). Chloroquine inhibits CVB4 E2 replication (D) and prevents virus-induced thymocyte depletion (E). The dashed line in panel E shows the viability of mock-infected cells. , P < 0.001 versus chloroquine-treated DP thymocytes (n = 3). MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
|
0.07% pDC, and
0.04% immature dendritic cells) were inoculated with CVB4 E2 with or without chloroquine. DP thymocytes were harvested 3 days after inoculation and stained for CD4, CD8, MHC class I, and viability (7-AAD). Compared to mock-infected DP thymocytes, CVB4 E2-infected DP thymocytes showed increases in MHC class I expression (Fig. 6C) and in negative-strand RNA (Fig. 6D), a finding consistent with direct effects of infection. Infectious virus was detected in the supernatants (data not shown), and infected DP cells were depleted compared to the mock-infected cells (Fig. 6E) (P < 0.001). The phenotype of live cells did not vary during culture because mock- and CVB4 E2-infected FTOC had >96% DP thymocytes (data not shown). Chloroquine treatment reduced the levels of positive- and negative-strand RNA in purified DP thymocytes (Fig. 6D) (P < 0.001) and completely blocked CVB4 E2-induced MHC class I upregulation (Fig. 6C). Chloroquine did not affect cell viability but did prevent virus-induced depletion (Fig. 6E). These results suggest that MHC class I upregulation occurs through a direct infection of DP thymocytes. |
|
|---|
The release of infectious virus had obvious cytopathic effects. CVB4 E2, like most enteroviruses, causes cytolytic infections, but it can also establish nonlytic persistent infections (5, 8). Although other members of the enterovirus group, such as poliovirus 1, induce apoptosis under some conditions (1), CVB4 E2-induced apoptosis has been rarely reported. In our experiments, Annexin V staining showed no increase in apoptosis of infected thymocytes. Flow stainings showed that cellular depletion was most evident in DP and SP4 subpopulations. Thus, DP and SP4 thymocytes can support replication of CVB4 E2, and infection of these cells leads to obvious cytopathic effects. On the other side, SP8 cells were not depleted by CVB4 E2, which was in agreement with our inability to detect CVB4 E2 RNA in those cells. CVB4 E2 tropism has been reported in human T-cell lines where the virus replicates persistently without evidence of cytopathic effect (34). However, our study is different from those of others investigators because we report the first demonstration that human thymocyte subpopulations sustain CVB4 E2 replication and are depleted after CVB4 E2 infection. Indeed, the continuous increased virus progeny in supernatants of CVB4 E2-infected FTOC was correlated with positive- and negative-strand RNA detection and total thymocyte depletion. Together, these data indicate that CVB4 E2 replication in FTOC results in virus dissemination during the time course of the culture.
Herpesviruses, adenoviruses, and vaccinia virus decrease MHC expression (26, 37, 45), whereas MHC class I expression can be upregulated on vertebrate cells through indirect mechanisms by HIV-1 (27) and through direct mechanisms by West Nile virus (22, 27). In our FTOC cultures, MHC class I expression was upregulated on immature thymocytes and correlated strongly with markers of active viral replication, such as negative-strand viral RNA and the release of infectious virus. This effect was related to the virus since anti-virus neutralizing antibodies inhibited MHC class I. MHC class I upregulation was completely inhibited by treatment of CVB4 E2 supernatants with chloroquine, a lysosomotropic agent that increases the pH of acidic prelysosomal vacuoles and blocks viral penetration or uncoating (16). Thus, the ability of CVB4 E2 to modulate MHC class I expression on immature DP thymocytes involves at least entry or uncoating of the virus associated with replication and depletion of these cells. In single-cell suspensions of DP thymocytes, chloroquine blocked CVB4 E2-induced upregulation of MHC class I, reduced negative-strand viral RNA by 90%, and inhibited CVB4 E2-induced depletion. The low levels of negative-strand viral RNA (<20 copies/10 ng of rRNA) did not seem to influence MHC class I expression, suggesting that a threshold of replication was necessary for MHC class I upregulation. In addition, MHC class I upregulation was largely dependent on MOI. Moreover, CVB4 E2-induced MHC class I upregulation occurred even when IFN-
was blocked by neutralizing antibodies, and despite numerous attempts, we were unable to detect IFN-
, IFN-ß, or IFN-
in supernatants from CVB4-infected FTOC. Furthermore, chloroquine-treated supernatants of CVB4-infected FTOC did not upregulate MHC class I, which argues against the role of soluble factors released by CVB4-infected FTOC in the observed phenomenon. Together, these data showed that MHC class I upregulation on immature DP thymocytes was dependent on CVB4 E2 replication in this subpopulation, which strongly suggested a direct viral effect. Whether viral components and/or intracellular virus-induced factors are involved in this phenomenon remains to be determined.
Clearly, the mechanisms of upregulation of MHC class I obtained with CVB4E2 in thymic cells are distinct from those playing a role in the increased MHC expression obtained with HIV-1 in these cells. Indeed, HIV-1 infection induced high levels of IFN-
involved in indirect mechanisms of upregulation of MHC class I in our system. Our results of MHC class I upregulation on thymocytes obtained with HIV-1 are in agreement with those from another group, who reported that HIV-1 induced IFN-
secretion by pDC2 (20). Together, these data suggest that CVB4, in contrast to HIV-1, did not infect pDC2 or did not induce IFN-
production by these cells, which is in agreement with previous report of CVB4-induced production of IFN-
in monocytes, whereas pDC in peripheral blood did not secrete IFN-
in response to CVB4, in contrast to HSV-1, a well-known IFN-
inducer in these cells (7, 16). However, CVB4 E2 infection of FTOC altered pDC2 since we observed a significant depletion of pDC2 in CVB4 E2-infected FTOC compared to mock-infected cultures (0.1% versus 1.2% [data not shown]). Whether pDC2 were depleted by direct infection mechanisms was difficult to ascertain due to the low numbers of these cells in FTOC cultures. Alternatively, pDC2 can be depleted by bystander mechanisms since the viability of pDC is altered significantly when their cellular and culture environment changes (43). Further experiments are needed to clarify whether the lack of IFN-
responsiveness to CVB4 E2 in FTOC can be the consequence of pDC2 depletion.
The pattern of results obtained with CVB4 E2 compared to HIV-1 in our experiments, together with experiments showing that supernatants from CVB4 E2-infected FTOC, when treated with chloroquine and put on new FTOC, did not induce MHC I upregulation, demonstrated that the CVB4 E2-induced MHC-I upregulation was not due to virus-induced cytokine.
Whether TEC were infected in a similar manner to DP thymocytes was difficult to establish given the low abundance of TEC extracted from FTOC (5%). However, we observed that IL-6, and GM-CSF, cytokines produced by TEC in human thymus (30), were produced by CVB4 E2-infected FTOC (data not shown). Recently, we reported that CVB4 can infect productively primary cultures of human TEC that results in IL-6 and GM-CSF secretion by these cells (5). Altogether, these data suggest that CVB4 E2 infection of human FTOC can lead to TEC infection. Whether TEC from FTOC inoculated with CVB4 E2 were infected remains to be clarified; nevertheless, CVB4 E2 affected TEC in FTOC. Indeed, flow cytometry extracellular and intracellular stainings showed a two- to fourfold upregulation of MHC class I expression on FSChi SSChi CD4 CD8 cytokeratinintrac+ cells (TEC) isolated from CVB4 E2-infected FTOC compared to mock cultures (P < 0.001) (data not shown) by using appropriate isotype controls as previously described (32).
The rationale for choosing CVB4 E2 in our system was to examine the replication and the effects of a relevant CVB4 strain isolated from a patient with type 1 diabetes (48). Enterovirus RNA, with strong homology with CVB4 E2, has been detected in the peripheral blood of type 1 diabetes patients (47). In our system, CVB4 JBV strain was capable of infecting and replicating in human FTOC and induced effects similar to those of CVB4 E2 (data not shown). Thus, the viral replication and effects in human FTOC were not restricted to the CVB4 E2 strain.
Coxsackievirus B infection in midpregnancy (mice) has been associated with delayed thymic development of the fetus (28). Diabetogenic CVB4 can reach the thymus in the course of systemic infection of mice (6), which results in a significant increase of CD4 CD8 thymocytes, together with insulitis and hyperglycemia, which indicates that CVB4 infection may be associated with abnormal T-cell maturation in vivo. It has been suggested that a fetal infection with coxsackievirus B may initiate autoimmunity or cause persistent infection that may lead to progressive beta-cell destruction that could play a role in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (11). Furthermore, massive thymic depletion has been linked to autoimmunity emergence in mice models (40). Together, these reports suggest that CVB4 E2 thymic infection results in morphological and functional anomalies of the thymus. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether CVB4 infection of the fetal thymus can play a role in the impairment of central T-cell self-tolerance, which may provide a better knowledge about the pathogenesis of CVB4-induced diabetes type 1.
We thank Mike McCune for thoughtful discussions and ideas; Jean-Francois Vanbellinghen and Christophe Kreis for assistance with quantitative RT-PCR; Marty Bigos, Dax Darguello, and Valerie Stepps for flow cytometry assistance; and Mary Keir for assistance with cell culture.
Present address: University of Liege, Center of Immunology, Institute of Pathology, Liege-Sart-Tilman, Belgium. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»