Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, July 2004, p. 7852-7860, Vol. 78, No. 14
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.14.7852-7860.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Pathology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111
Received 27 October 2003/ Accepted 17 March 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
There are three families of viruses that are associated with superantigen or superantigen-like activity: Retroviridae, Rhabdoviridae, and Herpesviridae. Retroviral superantigens were first depicted in the B-type virus group in mouse mammary tumor viruses and are found in both infectious mouse mammary tumor viruses and endogenous proviruses (14, 18, 39, 63). It has been previously shown that the env gene of HERV-K18, a defective human endogenous provirus located on chromosome 1, encodes a superantigen activity (51, 52). The HERV-K family is closely related to the B-type retroviruses based on amino acid similarity in the reverse transcriptase gene (48). HERV-K18 is a relatively recent integrant in the genome, as it is found in Old World primates but not in New World primates, indicating that it was acquired subsequent to the evolutionary divergence of these species (28). A few years ago, it was reported that Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with TCRBV13-specific superantigen activity, which is MHC class II dependent and not due to a recall antigen response (53). More recently, it was demonstrated that the superantigen activity is due to EBV transactivation of HERV-K18 env (52). We show here that this activity is dependent upon the major EBV latent gene transactivator EBNA-2, which upregulates most of the other EBV latent genes, all of which have the ability to transactivate host cell genes. In accordance with this finding, we show that the EBV latent membrane protein LMP-2A is sufficient for transactivation of HERV-K18 env.
EBV latent cycle genes are associated with transactivation of HERV-K18. In order to map the EBV gene(s) responsible for transactivation of the HERV-K18 superantigen, we tested B cells infected with various EBV deletion mutants for their ability to preferentially stimulate interleukin-2 (IL-2) production from TCRBV13 T-cell hybridomas. We simultaneously assessed activation of TCRBV8 T-cell hybridomas as a specificity control. Hybridoma assays were performed as described previously (52, 53) by using the TCRBV13 T-cell hybridoma, hVß13.1-1 (11, 12) and the TCRBV8 T-cell hybrid YLß8#24 (53). Figure 1A depicts the results of a representative hybridoma assay with two lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL), Mg68 and 253.30, that were derived by transformation with EBV deletion mutants lacking the majority of the lytic genes. A LCL transformed with the prototypic laboratory strain of EBV, B95-8, served as a positive control.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. EBNA-2-dependent transactivation of the HERV-K18 superantigen. (A) LCL transformed by deletion mutant EBV (Mg68 and 253.30) or B95-8 EBV were tested for the ability to stimulate TCRBV13 and TCRBV8 T-cell hybridomas. EBV BL-41 lymphoma cells were also tested and compared with BL-41 infected with B95-8 (BL-41/B95-8) or EBNA-2-deficient P3HR1 virus (BL-41/P3HR1). EBV cell lines used as superantigen-presenting cells were treated overnight with phorbol myristate acetate (10 ng/ml; Calbiochem) at 37°C. Cells were washed extensively in phosphate-buffered saline, counted, and resuspended with T-cell hybrids in 96-well round-bottom plates with 105 antigen-presenting cells and 2 x 104 T-cell hybrids per well. After 24 to 48 h at 37°C, the plates were frozen at 80°C to lyse the cells, and thawed supernatants were tested for the presence of IL-2 by HT-2 bioassay as previously described (53). As the positive control, the T-cell hybrids were cross-linked with plate-bound anti-CD3 (145 2C11). The mean IL-2 production for each T-cell hybrid measured in quadruplicate wells was expressed in picograms per milliliter of culture supernatant by comparison with values from a standard curve derived from recombinant IL-2 (R & D Systems). Error bars represent the difference measured between quadruplicate wells within a single experiment. Experiments were performed at least five times. (B) Semiquantitative RT-PCR for HERV-K18 read-through transcripts and 18S rRNA was performed on uninfected BL-41, BL-41/B95-8, BL-41/P3HR1, and BL-41/P3HR1 stably transfected with EBNA-2 (MCB1-9 cells). In addition, LCL transformed by recombinant EBV with estrogen-responsive EBNA-2 (EREB/2-6 cells) were tested in the presence or absence of estrogen. cDNA was prepared by random priming of total RNA that had been DNase I treated to remove contamination by genomic DNA. All samples were prepared in the presence (+) or absence () of RT. The PCR sense primer was 5' TCCGAAGAGACAGTGACATCGA 3', directed against a HERV-K18 env-specific sequence; the antisense primer was 5' TGGCAATGCTGGCTATGTAAGT 3', directed against a chromosome 1q23.1-q24.1 (GenBank accession number AL121985) sequence, located 127 bp downstream of the 3' viral long terminal repeat. PCR was performed in the presence of [32P] -dCTP, incorporating primers specific for 18S rRNA as an endogenous standard. Since the HERV-K18 read-through transcripts were extremely rare compared with the 18S rRNA, 18S Classic competimers (Ambion) were added at a primer-to-competimer ratio of 1:20. PCR was performed by using a hot start of 4 min at 94°C and then 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 90 s at 72°C, and 60 s at 55°C, followed by a 7-min extension at 72°C, which yielded products within a linear range. PCR products were separated on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. HERV-K18 read-through transcripts were quantified by phosphorimaging (Molecular Dynamics), and induction (fold) was calculated after normalization against the 18S rRNA product; values are reported below each lane.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of EBV deletion mutant cell lines tested for superantigen activitya
|
(24, 64) and the ets members Pu.1 and Spi-B (31, 36), transactivating LMP-1 and the other EBV latent genes. EBNA-LP acts in concert with EBNA-2, increasing transactivation of LMP-1 (22, 46), which has oncogenic properties (2, 43, 61) and induces multiple cellular genes (20, 35, 62). EBNA-2 also directly transactivates a variety of cellular genes, such as CD23 (7, 45, 62), and represses immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IgH) expression (30). Thus, the following question was posed. Could EBNA-2, either directly or indirectly, transactivate the HERV-K18 superantigen? To assess this point, we determined the level of HERV-K18 transcription in the various EBV-infected cell lines. Since up to 8% of the human genome consists of HERV sequences, many of which are highly homologous, we designed a sensitive reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assay for the detection of HERV-K18-specific read-through transcripts. This assay is based upon the observation that in up to 15% of proviral transcripts, the cellular RNA polymerase reads through the polyadenylation site in the 3' long terminal repeat, transcribing adjacent chromosomal insertion sequences (54, 55). We therefore used RT-PCR primers specific for the upstream HERV-K18 env gene and the downstream chromosome 1 insertion site. Because of the length of the read-through transcripts, real-time PCR could not be used; thus, to render this assay semiquantitative, the PCR cycles were limited, keeping the product within the linear range, and primers specific for the 18S ribosomal subunit were included in each reaction as an endogenous standard. It has previously been reported that this assay correlates well with results obtained in an RNase protection assay for HERV-K18 transcription (52). Figure 1B shows that after infection with B95-8 virus, but not P3HR1, HERV-K18 transcription is strongly induced in BL-41 cells, confirming the functional results depicted in Fig. 1A. When EBNA-2 is provided in trans in BL-41 cells infected with P3HR1 (MCB1-9) (13), the level of HERV-K18 transcripts increases. Additional support for the hypothesis that EBNA-2 has a role in transactivating the HERV-K18 superantigen comes from an EBNA-2-conditional LCL, ER/EB2-6. This cell line is transformed with recombinant EBV in which the EBNA-2 gene was replaced with an estrogen-responsive EBNA-2 gene (32). LCL growth is dependent upon estrogen because EBNA-2 expression is required for expression of the other EBV-transforming genes. The removal of estrogen from these cells resulted in growth arrest (32) and, as can be seen in Fig. 1B, downregulation of HERV-K18 transcription. Since EBNA-2 transactivates all of the EBV latent genes, with the exception of EBNA-1, these results substantiate that a latent gene induces HERV-K18.
LMP-2A is sufficient for transactivation of HERV-K18 Env. There are nine latent genes: EBNA-1, EBNA-2, EBNA-3A, EBNA-3B, EBNA-3C, EBNA-LP, LMP-1, LMP-2A, and LMP-2B. To define whether it was EBNA-2 itself or one of the other latent genes that induces HERV-K18, we obtained a panel of recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing various EBV latent genes (33, 44). We infected the EBV BL-41 cell line with each of these recombinant viruses or a negative control virus, VVTK, as previously described (33, 44), and we then looked for induction of HERV-K18 read-through transcripts by RT-PCR. At 8, 18, and 24 h postinfection, cells were lysed in Trizol (Invitrogen), and total RNA was isolated and subjected to RT-PCR analysis. Figure 2A shows results obtained in representative experiments after 18 h (upper panel) and 24 h (lower panel) of infection, and the severalfold induction of HERV-K18 at 8, 18, and 24 h postinfection is summarized in Fig. 2B, normalized against the VVTK infected cells. The data indicate that only the LMP-2A virus consistently induced HERV-K18 transcripts more than twofold over time. These experiments were repeated twice, and in both cases, LMP-2A elevated HERV-K18 transcripts at 18 and 24 h.
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Infection of BL-41 with LMP-2A vaccinia virus selectively induces HERV-K18 env. BL-41 cells were infected with a panel of recombinant vaccinia viruses containing different EBV latent genes, EBNA-1, EBNA-2, EBNA-3A, EBNA-3B, EBNA-3C, EBNA-LP, and LMP-2A, or control virus VVTK. Eight, 18, or 24 h postinfection, cells were lysed, RNA was extracted, and semiquantitative RT-PCR for K18 and 18S transcripts was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 1B. (A) RT-PCR analysis at 18 h (top panel) and 24 h (bottom panel) postinfection. The ratio of HERV-K18 to 18S rRNA was measured by phosphorimager analysis, and the induction (fold) is reported below each lane. (B) Summary of RT-PCR analyses at 8, 18, and 24 h postinfection (p.i.) in one of two representative experiments. Induction (fold) of HERV-K18 was calculated by normalization with values obtained from VVTK infected cells. N.D., not determined.
|
Figure 3A shows expression of LMP-2A and LMP-1 48 h after infection of BL-41 cells with AdLMP2 and UpLMP1 adenoviruses at an MOI of 100. At a higher MOI, the AdLMP2 virus appeared to have toxic effects on the infected cells, inhibiting growth while not showing any increase in specific staining of LMP-2A (19; data not shown). The cells were fixed and stained as previously described (19) with the 8C3 monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for LMP-2A (19) or the S12 MAb specific for LMP-1 (BD Pharmingen), and each staining was compared with the isotype control MAb. Figure 3B depicts EGFP expression 48 h postinfection of BL-41 cells with each of the recombinant adenoviruses. Interestingly, while the ubiquitin promoter vectors yielded high expression of LMP-1 and EGFP in BL-41 cells, LMP-2A, which we also cloned into the ubiquitin promoter vector, was poorly expressed compared with its expression in the CMV promoter vector (data not shown). Furthermore, the expression of LMP-2A and LMP-1 after adenoviral infection of BL-41 was much higher than the expression of these genes in various LCL or B95-8-infected BL-41 (data not shown). In Fig. 3C, we demonstrate that AdLMP2 upregulates transcription of HERV-K18 read-through transcripts compared with AdEGFP, while LMP-1 upregulates HERV-K18 to a lesser extent compared with UpGFP. Figure 3D shows that after infection with AdLMP2 at MOI of 100 and 300, BL-41 cells preferentially stimulate the TCRBV13 T-cell hybridoma, similar to infection with B95-8 EBV, while infection with AdEGFP was nonstimulatory. This difference was highly significant (P = 0.00005 to 0.00001). UpLMP-1 gave a lower level stimulation that was also significantly elevated (P < 0.007) compared with UpGFP. We have performed these experiments repeatedly using various MOI between 50 and 1,000 and at various time points postinfection. Significant differences were consistently seen using MOI of 100 and 300, while an MOI of 1,000 often showed toxic effects on the cells. These results prove that LMP-2A, and to a lesser degree, LMP-1, is sufficient for induction of the HERV-K18 Env superantigen. It is possible that LMP-1 and/or other EBV latent genes act in synergy, increasing induction of HERV-K18 transcripts; however, we saw no evidence for synergy between LMP-1 and LMP-2A after coinfection of BL-41 with both adenoviral vectors (Fig. 4). In Fig. 4A, we show that both LMP-1 and LMP-2A are coexpressed after coinfection of BL-41 with the UpLMP1 and AdLMP2 viruses at an MOI of 100 for each. Figure 4B shows that superantigen activity is not increased by coinfection with both viruses at an MOI of 100. We have repeated these experiments at various time points postinfection (48 and 72 h) and using other MOI (50 and 300), but we failed to see synergy (data not shown). It is possible that the lack of synergism between the EBV latent membrane proteins in these experiments is due to the fact that both of these proteins are overexpressed compared with their levels in EBV-infected B cells. Alternatively, expression of other EBV nuclear antigens might modulate the transactivation.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Infection of BL-41 with AdLMP2 transactivates the HERV-K18 superantigen. Adenovirus vectors containing LMP-2A (AdLMP2), LMP-1 (UpLMP1), or EGFP (AdEGFP, UpGFP, and UpLMP1) were used to infect BL-41 cells at an MOI of 100. (A) AdLMP2- and UpLMP1-infected cells were stained 48 h postinfection with MAbs specific for LMP-2A (8C3) and LMP-1 (S12) or isotype-matched control antibody. (B) EGFP expression in BL-41 48 h postinfection with each adenovirus. (C) Adenovirus-infected cells were lysed 96 h postinfection and subjected to RT-PCR analysis for K18 and 18S rRNA transcripts as described in the legend to Fig. 1B. Alternatively, cells infected at an MOI of 100 or 300 were tested for their ability to stimulate the TCRBV13 and TCRBV8 T-cell hybridomas, as described in the legend to Fig. 1A. (D) The mean IL-2 production for each T-cell hybrid was measured in quadruplicate wells by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and expressed in picograms per milliliter of culture supernatant by comparison with values from a standard curve derived from recombinant IL-2 (R & D Systems). Error bars represent the difference measured between quadruplicate wells in one representative experiment. Experiments were performed at least three times. The response of the hybrids to BL-41/B95-8 and anti-CD3 cross-linkage was included as a positive control.
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Lack of synergy between latent membrane proteins after coinfection of BL-41 with UpLMP1 and AdLMP2. (A) BL-41 cells were mock infected or coinfected with UpLMP1 and AdLMP2 at an MOI of 100 for each. Cells were stained 48 h postinfection with MAb specific for LMP-2A (8C3) and LMP-1 (S12) or isotype-matched control antibody shown on the y axis, and EGFP is shown on the x axis by flow cytometry. (B) Cells infected at an MOI of 100 were tested for superantigen activity by the TCRBV13 T-cell hybridoma, as described in the legend to Fig. 1A.
|
) strongly induces HERV-K18 expression in the peripheral blood (51). LMP-2A and IFN-
are not known to share signaling pathways; thus, it is puzzling that both can transactivate this particular HERV. LMP-2A is a membrane protein with intracellular domains containing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs). Studies from LMP-2A transgenic mice suggest that LMP-2A signaling mimics B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) signal transduction. In these mice, LMP-2A+ B cells lacking surface Ig exit the bone marrow and enter the circulation. Since Ig-negative B cells normally do not survive, these data indicate that LMP-2A signaling rescues the cells (5, 6). In EBV-infected B cells, the tyrosine kinases Syk and Lyn bind to the phosphorylated ITAMs on LMP-2A through their SH2 domains. In this manner, they are sequestered away from the BCR, resulting in phospholipase C-
2 activation (5, 6, 38, 40, 41). Mutation of the Syk-binding ITAM on LMP-2A abolishes the B-cell survival signal in the mice (40). In addition, it was shown that LMP-2A signals mediate tyrosine phosphorylation of the SH2-containing adaptor protein SLP-65, leading to complex formation with the adaptor protein CrkL and ultimately resulting in phosphorylation of Cbl and C3G (16). IFN-
signaling, on the other hand, is well known to occur through the JAK-STAT pathway (reviewed in reference 4). It has been reported that IFN-
binding to its receptor activates the Janus family kinase Tyk-2, signaling Lyn to bind through its SH2 domain to the phosphorylated ITAM on Tyk-2 (57). Thus, the tyrosine kinase Lyn appears in both the IFN-
receptor pathway and the LMP-2A and BCR signaling pathways, suggesting a possible link. In addition, while STAT1 and STAT2 proteins have long been considered requisites for type I IFN receptor signaling, recent data suggest that STAT5 is also important (17, 58). Furthermore, it was shown that the CrkL adaptor protein is required for IFN-
-dependent gene transcription, presumably via CrkL complex formation with STAT5, which allows DNA binding to gamma-activated sites (GAS) (37, 58). Thus, CrkL is activated in both LMP-2A and IFN-
signaling pathways, implying a possible role of this adaptor in the induction of HERV-K18.
Our data indicate that LMP-1 transactivates HERV-K18 less efficiently than does LMP-2A. LMP-1 is known to activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase and NF-
B pathways (reviewed in reference 15). Interestingly, there is an NF-
B site in a designated EBV-inducible enhancer sequence upstream of the CD48 promoter on chromosome 1, within easy distance of HERV-K18, which resides in the first CD48 intron (23). It has been postulated that the CD48 enhancer may boost transcription of HERV-K18 (52). Moreover, recent evidence suggests that, like IFN-
, LMP-1 also signals through the JAK-STAT pathway, phosphorylating both STAT3 and STAT5 in different cell types (8, 9). In EBV-infected B cells, LMP-1 and LMP-2A are frequently coexpressed, often in the presence of other EBV transcription factors. While we have shown here that LMP-2A by itself is sufficient to transactivate the HERV-K18 superantigen in EBV Burkitt's lymphoma cells, it is likely that in the complex situation of EBV infection where multiple viral genes are expressed, other genes, such as LMP-1, modulate transcription of the HERV.
In this paper, we have shown that the EBV latent genes transactivate a host cell superantigen. In terms of EBV biology, we propose that EBV elicits superantigen-activated T cells to supply requisite signals to the EBV-infected B cells, allowing them to differentiate into memory cells, the site of long-term viral persistence in the host. It is well known that B-cell differentiation to the memory stage is T cell dependent; therefore, we postulate that EBV induces the superantigen to facilitate entry into the memory B-cell compartment, where it can persist for the lifetime of the healthy host. In the immunosuppressed host, superantigen-activated T cells might instead cause viral reactivation and/or enhanced survival of EBV+ tumor cells.
We are most grateful to David Thorley-Lawson, Bettina Kempkes, Georg Bornkamm, Gilbert Lenoir, Richard Longnecker, and Erle Robertson for constructive scientific advice and donation of EBV cell lines. We thank Denis Moss for the panel of recombinant vaccinia viruses and Premlata Shankar for help in amplifying and titering the vaccinia viruses. We are grateful to Cliona Rooney for the LMP-2A adenoviral vector, James DeGregori for the UpGFP adenoviral vector, and Wei Li for the AdEGFP vector and for advice on adenovirus technology. In addition, we thank Elisabeth Kremmer for the LMP-2A MAb. We also thank Philippa Marrack and Rafick-Pierre Sekaly for the TCRBV T-cell hybridomas.
|
|
|---|
B activity. J. Virol. 66:6496-6501.
and PU.1. J. Virol. 69:253-262.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»