Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2004, p. 5766-5772, Vol. 78, No. 11
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.11.5766-5772.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
W. French Anderson,2 and Lorraine M. Albritton1*
Department of Molecular Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163,1 Gene Therapy Laboratories, Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 900332
Received 8 May 2003/ Accepted 19 February 2004
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
We sought to determine if D84 directly interacts with the virus receptor or if the D84K change affects infection by acting at a distance from the actual site of Env-receptor contact. Since receptor binding appears to trigger the conformation changes that activate Env for membrane fusion, this information is of importance in understanding the triggering mechanism. It may also be an important consideration in developing new approaches to the design of chimeric Env that redirect or target infection to a new receptor, particularly if targeted infection is to approach the efficiency of natural MoMLV infection.
The ecotropic MLVs utilize a common receptor, the mouse cationic amino acid transporter 1 (mATRC1, also called MCAT-1) (2, 11, 19). Although all mammals have a homologous ATRC1 transporter, only ATRC1s from mice and rats are capable of functioning as virus receptors. Several residues within its third extracellular domain have been shown to influence virus binding: asparagine 232 (rN232), valine 233 (rV233), tyrosine 235 (rY235), and glutamic acid 237 (rE237) (1, 21). Substitution of two or more of these residues greatly reduced binding of purified SU and infection, whereas replacement of any single one does not affect binding or infection, indicating that none of them is essential (1). Addition of all of these critical residues to the human ATRC1 gave 30% purified SU binding compared to that with the wild-type (WT) receptor (1).
We recently showed that lysine 234 (rK234) in the receptor also influences binding. Although infection via mutant receptors carrying a lysine 234-to-alanine (rK234A), a lysine-to-glutamate (rK234E), or a lysine-to-aspartate (rK234D) change was comparable to that via WT receptor, virus binding was reduced (16). In addition, 293 cells expressing double mutant rY235A plus rK234D receptors showed greatly reduced infection and loss of binding, whereas infection was not affected by double mutant rE237A plus rK234D (16).
Structural data on the SU-receptor complex would reveal a precise molecular description of binding. The structure of the receptor binding domain (RBD; residues 1 to 236) of SU has been solved (6); however, limitations in solving the structure of complexes consisting of large soluble proteins bound to multiple membrane pass proteins like mATRC1 have prevented solution of the binary complex. Based on genetic data, Davey et al. proposed that a hydrophobic pocket at the top of the RBD is the receptor binding site (5). This putative site includes the critical aspartate. In Davey's model, the critical receptor residues rY235 and rE237 bind in this pocket directly to the FrMLV equivalent of D84 and a nearby tryptophan residue, W102 (5).
Two obvious questions are (i) why does a D84K change reduce binding and (ii) which, if any, residue(s) in the receptor interacts with the critical D84. Here we report that D84K virus infection increased 3,000-fold on cells expressing receptor with a rK234A change and 100,000-fold on cells expressing a rK234D change compared to WT receptor. This complementation suggests that steric hindrance and charge repulsion between the lysine at position 84 of the D84K Env mutant and the lysine in position 234 of the receptor accounts for the largest part of the loss of infection of D84K virus and by inference that D84 is close to rK234 in the SU-receptor complex. The stronger complementation of D84K virus infection by rK234D than by rK234A receptor supports that a potential interaction between these two residues influences binding.
|
|
|---|
Plasmid constructions. Plasmid pcDNA-MoMLV carrying gag, pol, and ecotropic env genes has been described elsewhere (24) and was used as a backbone for construction and expression of the mutant Env. Specific substitutions on the env gene were generated by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange kit; Stratagene). After mutagenesis, the PmlI and BspEI fragment containing specific env mutations was subcloned into the PmlI and BspEI sites of pcDNA-MoMLV, and the DNA sequence was confirmed. The construction of pcDNA mATRC1-HA encoding WT mouse Atrc-1 cDNA (accession number M26687) was described elsewhere (12). Briefly, the sequences encoding three copies of the HA1 epitope tag from influenza virus hemagglutinin protein (HA) were fused to the carboxyl-terminal residue of the receptor. For construction of the receptor mutants, substitutions were obtained by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange kit; Stratagene), the HpaI-AgeI fragment containing each mutation was inserted into the HpaI-AgeI site of pcDNA mATRC1-HA, and the sequence was confirmed.
Virus production, titration, and Western blot analysis. H1-BAG cells were seeded at approximately 2 x106 cells per 100-mm dish and grown for 2 days until cells were about 60 to 70% confluent. Then, the cells were transfected using the CaPO4 coprecipitation method (17) with 40 µg of pcDNA-MoMLV or its derivative plasmids containing mutant Env. After overnight incubation, the precipitates were replaced with 10 ml of fresh medium containing 8% fetal bovine serum. The virus supernatant was harvested 24 and 48 h later, and each harvest was filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter. An aliquot of 3 ml was used to quantify infection by end point dilution titration. Target cells (about 5 x104 per well) were seeded in 24-well plates and then exposed to a serial 10-fold dilution of virus in the presence of 20 µg of Polybrene/ml. After overnight incubation with virus, the medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium. The next day cells were fixed and assayed for ß-galactosidase activity using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside staining. Viral titer was calculated as the lacZ-transducing units per milliliter. The remaining 7 ml of virus supernatant was pelleted through 3 ml of 25% sucrose at 30,000 rpm at 4°C for 1 h in a Beckman SW41 rotor. Viral pellets were resuspended in 40 µl of phosphate-buffered saline, and 10 µl of each was subjected to Western blot analysis as described previously (24). SU and the virion capsid protein (CA) were detected by goat anti-Rauscher-gp70 antiserum (1:100; identification no. 80S000018; Quality Biotech Inc.) and goat anti-Rauscher-p30 antiserum (1:10,000; identification no. 81S000263; Quality Biotech Inc.), respectively. Mouse anti-goat antiserum conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000; Sigma) was used as the secondary antibody.
Virus binding. Virus binding assays were performed exactly as previously described (16). Briefly, virus stock was concentrated and shedded SU was removed using a Centricon Plus-80 device (100-kDa molecular mass cutoff). A total of 106 cells were incubated with concentrated virus stock for 1 h at 4°C, after which unbound virus was removed by twice washing with ice-cold PBA (4% fetal bovine serum, 0.02% sodium azide in phosphate-buffered saline), and virus-cell complexes were incubated sequentially at 4°C with goat anti-gp70 antiserum (1:100) and with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated donkey anti-goat antiserum (1:200; Jackson Laboratories). The fluorescence intensity was analyzed by flow cytometry (Epics Profile Analyzer; Coulter Cytometry). Parent 293 cells incubated with WT virus and 293/mATRC1 incubated with virus-free medium served as negative controls. In some cases, viruses and cells were incubated for 20 min at 23 and 37°C, washed thrice to remove unbound virus using PBA preheated to 23 or 37°C, then fixed in 10% Formalin (Sigma) for 20 min at room temperature, and then washed twice more with 23 or 37°C PBA prior to incubation with antibodies. Cells incubated at 23 or 37°C for longer than 20 min showed appreciable cell death (as great as 20%).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Substitution of D84 in SU with arginine but not with alanine results in marked reduction of infection. (A) Infection of NIH 3T3 cells. Serial 10-fold dilutions of viruses pseudotyped with Env carrying the indicated substitutions were incubated with quadruplicate wells of NIH 3T3 cells. Virus infection was calculated from the end point dilution (n = 4) in infectious units per milliliter, defined as the lacZ-transducing infectious units per milliliter. Mean results of three independent experiments are shown ± standard errors. No error bar is indicated for infection of D84K virus because a zero value was observed in all three independent experiments. (B) Infection of 293/mATRC1 cells, a 293-derived cell line stably expressing mATRC1 at twice the level of NIH 3T3 cells (4). Each value is the average of results from three independent experiments ± the standard error. No error bar is indicated for infection of D84K virus because a zero value was observed in all three independent experiments. (C) Western blot analysis of virions. Virus pellets were separated on an SDS-8% polyacrylamide gel and immunoblotted to anti-SU antiserum (top) and anti-CA antiserum (bottom).
|
Genetic evidence that a clash between D84K or D84R in Env and rK234 in the receptor accounts for most but not all of the loss in infectivity. To further test our hypothesis, we sought to identify candidate residues on the receptor that are involved in the SU-receptor interaction. The obvious candidates were the previously identified critical receptor residues. Among these, we reasoned that rK234 was the best candidate. For example, if charge repulsion were involved in the lack of D84K infection, then rK234 would be a likely possibility for the clashing receptor residue. It would also a reasonable candidate if straightforward steric hindrance were involved. In either case, a lysine 234-to-alanine (rK234A) change should solve the problem by eliminating the side chain or its positive charge to give D84K and D84R infection.
We previously established 293-derived cell lines that stably express rK234 mutant receptors at or slightly above the level of control 293/mATRC1 (16). These included rK234A, a mutant receptor with the small nonpolar side chain of an alanine replacing the positively charged lysine. This mutant mediates WT virus entry as efficiently as mATRC1 (Fig. 2) (16). D84K and D84R virus showed over 4,300- and 75-fold increases in infection via rK234A, consistent with the binding site becoming much more accessible to the mutant virus when the lysine is replaced by alanine.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Replacing the side chain of rK234 in the receptor with an alanine gives infection by D84K or D84R virus. White bar, infection of 293/mATRC1; black bar, infection of 293 cells expressing rK234A mutant receptor. Values shown are the mean ± standard error of infection calculated from the end point dilution from three independent experiments. No error bar is indicated for infection of WT virus on mATRC1-positive cells because values shown for three independent experiments were normalized to the value of WT virus on these cells. In addition, the error bar for D84K infection of these cells reflects a value of zero in two of the three experiments and a value of 2 in the third experiment.
|
As previously reported, WT virus infected 293 cells expressing a rK234D mutant receptor as efficiently as 293/mATRC1 (Fig. 3A) (16). The mean titers of D84K and D84R viruses on rK234D receptor-positive cells were (5.3 ± 3.3) x 105 (mean ± standard error) and (3.3 ± 0.9) x 105 infectious units (IFU)/ml, respectively, about sixfold lower than WT virus on mATRC1 (2 x 106 IFU/ml) (Fig. 3A). Importantly, the level of complementation was substantially greater than complementation seen on rK234A-expressing cells, where infection was 500- and 80-fold lower than WT virus for D84K and D84R virus, respectively. We also quantified infection using a receptor mutant with another negative-for-positive-charge swap (glutamic acid; rK234E). Infection of the D84 down mutations via rK234E was only slightly improved compared to infection via mATRC1 (Fig. 3B). Here, infection was less than with aliquots of the same virus stocks on rK234A-expressing cells. Notably, infection when the side chain charges were swapped, i.e., D84K via the rK234D receptor ([5.3 ± 3.3] x 105 IFU/ml), was comparable to infection in the absence of interactive side chains at either position, i.e., D84A virus that via rK234A receptor ([7.0 ± 1.3] x 105 IFU/ml) (Fig. 3C). Both remained slightly below that of WT virus infection via these receptor mutants (2.0 x 106 IFU/ml).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. An aspartic acid substitution of rK234 in mATRC1 complemented infection of D84K and D84R virus. Lower levels of complementation were observed with a rK234E receptor mutant. (A) White bar, infection of 293/mATRC1; hashed bar, infection of 293 cells expressing rK234D mutant receptor. (B) White bar, infection of 293/mATRC1; gray bar, infection of 293 cells expressing rK234E mutant receptor. (C) White bar, infection of 293/mATRC1; black bar, infection of cells expressing rK234A mutant receptor. The titers were normalized based on the value of WT virus on the WT receptor. Values shown are the mean ± standard error from three independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Combination of rK234D plus either rY235A or rE237A abolishes complementation of D84K and D84R. White bar, infection of 293/mATRC1; black bar, infection of 293 cells expressing rK234D plus rY235A mutant receptor; gray bar, infection of 293 cells expressing rK234D plus rE237A mutant receptor; hashed bar, infection of 293 cells expressing rK234D mutant receptor. The experiments were performed twice; a representative experiment is shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Virus binding assay resultsa
|
The results are shown in Fig. 5. No significant difference was observed in WT virus binding to 293/mATRC1 cells at 23 versus 37°C, and these levels were not greater than that seen at 4°C, the increase in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) being 40-fold in each case. Notably, D84A virus showed a 20-fold increase in MFI at both 23 and 37°C on 293/mATRC1 cells, a level approximately 50% of WT virus binding. However, no D84K virus binding to rK234D cells was evident at the higher temperatures.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Increasing the temperature gave measurable binding of D84A virus to 293/mATRC1 cells but did not give measurable binding of D84K virus to rK234D-expressing cells. (A) Virus binding at 23°C. (B) Virus binding at 37°C. Virus binding was performed as described in Materials and Methods, and then the level of binding was analyzed by flow cytometry. Black line histograms represent the fluorescence intensity of WT, D84K, or D84A virus (horizontal) bound to 293/mATRC1 or 293 cells expressing the rK234D mutant receptor (vertical). The dotted line represents the basal level of fluorescence determined by incubation of WT virus with parental human 293 cells lacking ecotropic receptor. Values shown above each peak are the MFI.
|
|
|
|---|
Swapping charges between the Env and receptor residues is complementary, presumably because it maintains a relationship of size and charge similar to that normally present in the binary complex. The data for rK234E versus rK234A support the idea that charge and size influence complementation. We interpret higher complementation using rK234A as indicating that size has a greater influence than charge, that is, it is better to have no charge and small size, as in alanine, than to have charge and a less-than-optimal size, as in glutamic acid. Thus, the greatest level of complementation (infection) came from an exact swap between Env and the receptor, e.g., D84K Env and the rK234D receptor, which evidently have the most parsimonious size and charge.
Size may also explain why replacing D84 with lysine is more deleterious than replacing rK234 with aspartic acid. For example, the length of the side chains in residues 84 of Env and 234 of the receptor may influence the closest distance the two molecules can approach. Lysine side chains can extend almost twice the distance as aspartic acid side chains. The side chain of the critical aspartate extends 3.23 Å from its alpha-carbon in the Fr57 RBD structure (6), while Lys side chains extend about 5.17 to 6.22 Å for K106, -113, -131, -182, and -196 in the Fr57 RBD structure (6). Thus, the closest approach may be optimal for D84 with rK234, shorter for D84 with rK234D, and longer than optimal for D84K with rK234. If so, then a rK234D substitution would be expected to be less deleterious than a D84K change, since the strength of binding should be proportional to the distance between molecules. We favor this explanation, although others exist.
To date, no single residue of SU or of the receptor has been shown to be essential for virus infection. These results are consistent with the idea that SU-receptor binding involves multiple interactions. We favor that aspartic acid 84 contributes directly to infection and the Env binding interaction but is not essential to them, based on three observations. First, D84A virus was over 300-fold less infectious than WT virus on the rK234D plus E237A receptor (Fig. 4). Second, at 37°C, D84A virus binding to mATRC1 was only 50% of WT virus binding. If residue 84 made no direct contribution, then D84A infection and binding should have been comparable to that of WT virus on these receptors. Lastly, we interpret the lack of a substantial reduction in D84A virus infection via the rK234A receptor to be another indication that the contribution of residue 84 is not essential, that is, when its interactions are removed the remaining interactions between SU and the receptor still allow for infection. By similar reasoning, the contribution of rK234 also appears to contribute directly to infection but is not essential to it. The loss of infection via double receptor mutants (Fig. 4) provides further support for this concept.
The phenotype of D84A MoMLV reported here is similar in infection of NIH 3T3 cells to that reported for D86A FrMLV (5) but differs slightly in receptor binding. D86A FrMLV was almost as infectious as WT virus (20-fold less infection [5]), similar to D84A, observed here to be 3- to 8-fold less (Fig. 1A). However, D86A SU showed loss of receptor-specific binding (5), while D84A MoMLV binding was detectable at 23 and 37°C, albeit at half the level of WT virus (Fig. 5). One possibility for this difference is that in FrMLV the two additional residues present just upstream of D86 might somehow result in a greater dependence on the critical aspartic acid residue.
Infection did not correlate with virus binding for most of the combinations of Env and receptor mutants. Yet infection provided de facto evidence that virus binding occurred. A similar lack of correlation has been reported for other mutant Env (5, 13) and for WT MoMLV infection via other receptor variants (1). One explanation may be the relative sensitivity of the two assays. For instance, virus infection assays can potentially detect a single virus infection of a single cell, whereas the binding assay relies on detection of multiple viruses attached to each cell (10). Alternatively, the mutations may increase the dissociation rate so that few viruses are attached to the host cells at any one moment. An increase in dissociation rate might have a less profound effect on infection. In human immunodeficiency virus infection, for example, Env-mediated fusion is a slow process, taking about 15 to 20 min for prebound Env to begin fusion (7, 14, 15, 20). In contrast, virus binding is a much more rapid event; half-maximal binding is often achieved within 2 min, and equilibrium can occur within 10 min (10).
Based on the location of the critical aspartic acid in the crystal structure of the FrMLV RBD (6), aspartic acid 86 and tryptophan 102 (homologous to aspartic acid 84 and tryptophan 100 in MoMLV) have been proposed as the binding partners of rY235 and rE237 in the receptor (5). Given the observations reported here, we propose the following refinements to this concept: rK234 positions directly adjacent to and interacts with D84. This location would place rY235 further from the aspartic acid residue than previously proposed. Figure 6 shows the configuration that we visualize for an rK234 interaction with D84. Interestingly, this location would place the lysine side chain close enough to hydrogen bond with D84 and S82 (Fig. 6).
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Model for the close proximity of D84 and rK234 in the SU-receptor complex. The amino acid sequence of the MoMLV RBD (residues 1 to 234) was aligned with that of FrMLV (residues 1 to 236), and the alignment was used to model the structure of MoMLV sequences using SwissModel (8, 9). (A) Aspartic acid 84 (D84), serine 82 (S82), and tryptophan 100 (W100) are shown as stick diagrams, other residues in variable regions A and B are shown as space filled, and the remaining residues are depicted as ribbon diagrams rendered using RasMol (18). A stick diagram of a lysine residue representing rK234 in the virus receptor is shown to depict how we visualize its side chain closely juxtaposed to that of D84 on the RBD. Opaque space-filled versions are superimposed on stick diagrams. (B) A close-up of the region around D84 in the model, showing one possible configuration for the rK234 interaction with D84. Dashed lines depict potential hydrogen bonds predicted by SwissModel between the lysine side chain and D84 and S82 in SU.
|
This work was supported by NIH grants AI33410 (L.M.A.) and P01 CA59318 (W.F.A.).
Present address: VaxGen, South San Francisco, CA 94080. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»