Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 2004, p. 5382-5389, Vol. 78, No. 10
0022-538X/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.78.10.5382-5389.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Peking-Yale Joint Center for Plant Molecular Genetics and Agrobiotechnology, The National Laboratory of Protein Engineering and Plant Genetic Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871,1 Northwestern Agriculture and Forestry University, Department of Plant Protection, Shaanxi, Yangling, 712100, China,4 Plant Biology Division, Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Inc., Ardmore, Oklahoma 73401,2 National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-6510,3 Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute for Biochemistry and Plant Virology, D-38104 Braunschweig, Germany5
Received 8 August 2003/ Accepted 21 November 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell-to-cell movement by plant viruses is a requirement for the systemic infection of plants. Viral proteins essential for the cell-to-cell movement of the virus often have the characteristics of altering the size exclusion limits of the plasmodesmata (PD) in the cell wall (reviewed in references 11, 17, 18, 23, and 49) and in interacting with cytoskeletal elements (reviewed in references 1, 33, 35, and 50). Recent studies have identified genes encoding the movement protein (MP) of a virus by expressing the gene in the presence of a mutant virus that cannot move from cell to cell, in some instances when the MP is from a virus belonging to a different genus (9, 12, 13, 22, 28, 29, 30, 37, 38, 40, 41). The complemented movement is observed either by use of a mutant chimeric virus created by substituting a putative MP-encoding gene into the genome of a movement-defective virus (9, 13, 30, 38) or by bombardment or transformation of a plant with a plasmid expressing the putative MP and bombardment with a plasmid expressing a movement-defective virus (12, 22, 26, 28, 29, 40, 41). These complementation analyses are efficient and reliable approaches for identification of molecular components involved in the transport of viral RNA.
We have utilized the complementation approach to identify RDV movement proteins. The 12 RDV genome segments were cloned individually into a plant transient-expression vector. Some or all of these plasmids were individually introduced into cells of Nicotiana benthamiana, Nicotiana tabacum, or Oryza sativa leaves by microprojectile bombardment together with plasmids yielding movement-defective, but replication-competent, ß-glucuronidase (GUS)-tagged or green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Potato virus X (PVX). The movement and subcellular location of virus-encoded reporter protein were monitored by visualizing GUS activity or GFP fluorescence. In addition, a fusion of S6-encoded protein with enhanced GFP (eGFP) was monitored by confocal laser scanning microscopy after bombardment of Nicotiana tissue, and the location of the unfused S6-encoded protein was monitored by immunocytochemistry and electron microscopy after infection of O. sativa with RDV.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of plasmids used in this study.
|
Movement-defective GUS- or GFP-tagged PVX, designated pPVX.GUS-Bsp or pPVX.GFP-Bsp (Fig. 1), respectively, and provided by S. Y. Morozov, were used for complementation experiments (28, 29). Both contain the same frameshift mutation at nucleotide position 4959 within the 25-kDa protein ORF, resulting in the absence of 72 C-terminal amino acid residues in the translated protein. The cell-to-cell movement of infectious virus from these constructs was complemented by active 25-kDa protein and other movement-associated proteins (28). pPVXGUS, a derivative of pGC3 (5), was provided by David Baulcombe. All of the PVX constructs reside behind a CaMV 35S promoter (5, 28, 29).
A two-step recombinant PCR method (39) was used to generate the Pns6-eGFP (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) fusion ORF, with the following modifications. Pns6 was amplified by using high-fidelity Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) in the presence of a forward primer (S6 forward primer, 5'-AAAATGGACACAGAAACTCTTTGC-3') and a reverse primer containing complementary sequences from the 3' end of the S6-coding sequence and the 5' end of the eGFP-coding sequence (S6 reverse primer, 5'-CCTCGCCCTTGCTCACCATTTTGTACACGGTAATAGCA-3'). Similarly, the eGFP-coding region was amplified by using a forward primer complementary to the S6 reverse primer (eGFP forward primer, 5'-TGCTATTACCGTGTACAAAATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGG-3') and a reverse primer containing a KpnI site (eGFP reverse primer, 5'-GTCGGTACCTTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCC-3'). The resulting PCR fragments containing the S6 and eGFP ORFs were purified by using a PCR product purification kit (Plasmid Midi; Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.). The purified PCR products and the S6 forward and eGFP reverse primers were then used in a second PCR to create the S6-eGFP fusion with a KpnI site at the 3' end. After purification and digestion with KpnI, the resulting chimeric cDNA was ligated into the plant transient-expression vector pRTL2 (4, 34), previously digested with KpnI and NcoI, to yield pRTL2S6:eGFP (Fig. 1).
All constructs were sequenced by automated dye-terminator sequencing (model 377; PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) according to the manufacturer's protocol to confirm sequence authenticity.
Identification of N. benthamiana leaf development stages. Carboxyfluorescein (CF) dye was used to identify source and sink leaves on N. benthamiana plants. CF dye was applied to the petioles of the most mature leaves, and fluorescence was monitored with a UV lamp. CF dye moves through the phloem in a source-to-sink direction, unloading in sink, but not source, leaves (32, 36).
Inoculation of Nicotiana and Oryza leaves. Inoculation of N. benthamiana, N. tabacum, and O. sativa leaves by particle bombardment was performed with a high-pressure helium-based apparatus and the flying disk method (model PDS-1000; Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). For each series of bombardments, 5 µl of plasmid DNA (at 1.0 µg/µl) was precipitated onto 3 mg of gold particles (1-µm diameter; Bio-Rad) in the presence of a solution of calcium chloride (2.5 M) and spermidine (0.1 M). For the cobombardment, 2.5 µg of DNA of each plasmid was mixed and applied to gold particles in the same way as for the single bombardment. The plasmid DNA-coated gold particles were washed once with 70% ethanol and then maintained in suspension in absolute ethanol. After sonication, 20 µl of this mixture was placed on plastic flying disks and used for bombardment when the particles had dried. Source or sink leaves of N. benthamiana and source leaves of N. tabacum or O. sativa were placed in the center of a plastic petri dish and bombarded on a solid support at a target distance of 8 cm. Bombardment was done with a pulse of 1,100 kPa of helium gas in a vacuum chamber. For each of the constructs used in this research, the bombardment was repeated at least three times.
Histochemical analysis of GUS activity. Leaves were sampled at 30 h postbombardment for N. benthamiana and at 72 h postbombardment for N. tabacum. GUS activity was monitored by histochemical detection (20) with the following modification. Samples were infiltrated with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl ß-D-glucuronide (X-Gluc), at 600 µg/ml, in a solution containing 0.115 M phosphate buffer [pH 7.0], 3 mM potassium ferricyanide, and 10 mM EDTA. The phosphate-ferricyanide-EDTA mixture limits the diffusion of the intermediate products of the reaction (8). After incubation overnight at 37°C, leaves were fixed in 70% ethanol and examined by light microscopy.
Confocal microscopy. The bombarded tobacco leaves expressing eGFP or fused Pns6-eGFP were harvested at 24 h postbombardment and examined with a confocal imaging system (model 1024ES; Bio-Rad) attached to an upright microscope (Axioskop; Zeiss, Thornwood, N.Y.) equipped with 60x objective lens (Zeiss) as described previously (6). Serial optical sections were obtained at 0.5-µm intervals, and the projections of optical sections were combined on a Power Edge 2200 computer (Dell, Austin, Tex.) by using Lasersharp software version 3.1 (Bio-Rad).
Immunocytochemical electron microscopy. Small pieces of tissue were excised from RDV-infected and noninfected O. sativa leaves and fixed in a solution of 1% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde and 4% (wt/vol) formaldehyde in 100 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) for 3 h. After dehydration in a graded acetone series, the samples were embedded with Epon-araldite and polymerized at 60°C as described previously (21). For immunogold labeling, ultrathin tissue sections, attached to 200-mesh nick grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, Pa.), were floated on a drop of blocking solution containing 1% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl [pH 7.4]) for 20 min. The sections were then incubated for 2 h at room temperature with rabbit polyclonal antiserum against Pns6, which was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Y. Li, unpublished results), diluted 1:200 (vol/vol) in the blocking solution. The sections were rinsed four times (10 min each time) in TBS and then incubated for 1 h with goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin linked with 15-nm-diameter colloidal gold particles (GAR-gold, EM CARIgG15; Biocell Research Laboratories, Cardiff, United Kingdom) and diluted 1:30 in TBS. The sections were then washed in TBS and double-distilled water. After drying, the sections were contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined with an electron microscope (model EM10; Zeiss) at 80 kV. The specificity of immunogold labeling was determined by replacing primary antibody with rabbit preimmune serum or buffer.
|
|
|---|
Leaves bombarded with movement-competent pPVXGUS displayed large blue foci after histochemical staining (Fig. 2A). Cobombardment with pPVX.GUS-Bsp and plasmids containing individual ORFs from S1 through S12 showed that only S6 allowed the production of multicellular blue foci on N. benthamiana leaves (Fig. 2B and G and data not shown). The blue foci produced in the presence of pRTS6 were smaller and displayed enhanced signal along minor veins compared with foci produced by the movement-competent virus (Fig. 2A and B and data not shown). In contrast with results from cobombardment with pPVX.GUS-Bsp and pRTS6, bombardment with pPVX.GUS-Bsp alone yielded only small blue foci that were very difficult to see (Fig. 2C and H). These small blue foci represented initially bombarded individual cells. On rare occasions visible blue foci were observed after bombardment with pPVX.GUS-Bsp. These blue foci may have been formed by a small group of simultaneously infected epidermal or mesophyll cells or by passive diffusion of the chromogenic dye between cells, despite our use of a method to limit diffusion (26, 28, 29). These results indicate that pPVX.GUS-Bsp was unable to move from cell to cell. The same pattern of staining was produced after bombardment with a plasmid expressing only the GUS gene (data not shown) (28). The ability of the S6 segment to complement the movement of the movement-defective PVX was similar in sink and source leaves of N. benthamiana (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (106K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Cell-to-cell movement of a movement-defective PVX determined by transcomplementation with the S6 gene product of RDV in source leaves of N. benthamiana and N. tabacum. Leaves of N. benthamiana and N. tabacum were bombarded with pPVX.GUS-Bsp (movement defective) alone or with pPVX.GUS-Bsp and pRTS6 or pPVXGUS (movement capable). Bombarded leaves of N. benthamiana and N. tabacum were harvested and stained at 30 h or 3 days postbombardment, respectively. They were analyzed by histochemical staining and light microscopy. (A) N. benthamiana leaves bombarded with pPVXGUS, showing large blue infection foci (mean lesion size, 1,650.5 µm; standard deviation, 352 µm; standard error, 82 µm); (B and G) N. benthamiana leaves bombarded with pPVX.GUS-Bsp and pRTS6, showing intermediate-sized blue infection foci (mean, 683.3 µm; standard deviation, 168 µm; standard error, 27 µm [shown in panel B]); (C and H) N. benthamiana leaves bombarded with pPVX.GUS-Bsp alone, showing single-cell infections (mean, 38.5 µm; standard deviation, 9.3 µm; standard error, 1.8 µm [shown in panel C]); (D, E, and F) N. tabacum leaves bombarded with pPVXGUS, pPVX.GUS-Bsp and pRTS6, and pPVX.GUS-Bsp, respectively. Bars, 50 µm.
|
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Analysis of transcomplemented cell-to-cell movement by a movement-defective PVX in the presence of a translation-incompetent RDV S6 ORF or a Pns6-eGFP fusion in source leaves of N. benthamiana. The bombarded leaves were harvested and analyzed at 30 h postbombardment by histochemical staining and light microscopy. (A) Leaves bombarded with pPVX.GUS-Bsp (movement defective) and pRTS6T (translation incompetent), showing infection in a single cell. (B) Leaves bombarded with pPVX.GUS-Bsp, showing infection in a single cell. (C and D) Leaves bombarded with pPVX.GUS-Bsp and pRTL2S6:eGFP (Pns6-eGFP fusion) and with pPVX25.GUS-Bsp and pRTS6, respectively, showing multicellular blue infection foci. Bar, 50 µm.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Transcomplemented movement of movement-defective PVX (pPVX.GUS-Bsp) in leaves of N. tabacum and N. benthamiana in the presence of the S6 segment of RDV or the S6-eGFP fusiona
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Transcomplemented cell-to-cell movement of movement-defective pPVX.GFP-Bsp in the presence of the S6 gene product of RDV in source leaves of N. tabacum. Leaves were bombarded with pPVX.GFP-Bsp (movement defective) alone or with pPVX.GFP-Bsp and pRTS6. Images were taken with a confocal laser scanning microscope at 3 days postbombardment. (A) Leaves bombarded with pPVX.GFP-Bsp alone, showing infection in a single cell. (B) Leaves bombarded with pPVX.GFP-Bsp plus pRTS6, showing multicellular infection site. Each panel shows three independent cells expressing the product.
|
Subcellular location of Pns6-eGFP in leaves of N. tabacum and of Pns6 in leaves of O. sativa. To determine the subcellular location of RDV Pns6 in epidermal cells, the S6 ORF was fused with the 5' end of the coding sequence of eGFP and expressed through the activity of an enhanced CaMV 35S promoter (pRTL2S6:eGFP [Fig. 1]). A free eGFP behind the same promoter (Fig. 1) was used as a control. The subcellular locations of the proteins expressed from these plasmids were determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy.
Expression of the Pns6-eGFP fusion yielded strongly fluorescing structures along the cell wall, possibly associated with PD (Fig. 5 and data not shown). Free eGFP did not target to the cell wall or form subcellular aggregates in epidermal cells (data not shown). To determine whether the Pns6-eGFP fusion functioned similarly to native Pns6 in complementing the cell-to-cell movement of the movement-defective PVX, cobombardment with pPVX.GUS-Bsp and pRTL2S6:eGFP was performed. The Pns6-eGFP fusion complemented the cell-to-cell movement of pPVX.GUS-Bsp on N. benthamiana leaves (Fig. 3C; Table 1). Thus, multicellular infection by the movement-incompetent PVX occurred even though the Pns6-eGFP fusion protein did not traffic from cell to cell when bombarded alone (Fig. 5).
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Transient expression of Pns6-eGFP (pRTL2S6:eGFP) in epidermal cells of N. tabacum leaves. Leaves bombarded with pRTL2S6:eGFP were harvested at 30 h postbombardment, and images were taken with a confocal laser scanning microscope. (A) Fluorescent image of the expression pattern of Pns6-eGFP in a single cell. (B) Bright-field image under Nomarski illumination. (C) Merged image of panels A and B. Panels A and B are single optical sections from the same location within the cell.
|
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Subcellular localization of Pns6 in RDV-infected leaves of O. sativa (rice). Immunogold labeling of ultrathin sections from RDV-infected (A and B) and healthy (C) rice leaves with Pns6-specific antibody is shown. Bar, 250 nm.
|
|
|
|---|
The complemented movement of the movement-defective PVX by Pns6 was more similar to that of the wild-type virus in N. tabacum than to that in N. benthamiana (compare Fig. 2A and B with Fig. 2D and E). Since the constructs used for bombardment were identical, this result indicates that host factors important for spread of the viruses differ in these two species. N. benthamiana is particularly susceptible to a wide range of viruses (7, 44). It is possible that the complementation exhibited in N. benthamiana may be due to an inability of N. benthamiana to limit the accumulation and spread of the wild-type virus through a system not involving movement proteins. Further experiments quantifying virus accumulation and spread within the infected tissue will help to clarify this situation.
Although Pns6 fused with eGFP did not move from cell to cell, this fusion protein was as functional as native Pns6 in supporting the cell-to-cell movement of the movement-defective PVX (Fig. 3C and Table 1). This result indicates that the presence of other viral components, such as RNA or other proteins, was necessary for the multicellular spread of the defective PVX. A similar conclusion was reached to explain how the MP of Tomato mosaic virus complemented the movement of a movement-defective Tomato mosaic virus (40). For tobamoviruses, it is known that in addition to the MP, a viral protein(s) (i.e., the 126- and/or 183-kDa protein) involved in the accumulation of the virus within a cell also modulates virus cell-to-cell and systemic movement (10, 19, 24). Thus, it is possible that Pns6 functions in combination with a protein from PVX to allow movement of this virus. These studies indicate the power of transcomplementation experiments using movement-defective virus to identify proteins necessary for virus spread, in contrast to noncomplementation experiments studying the spread of the expressed putative movement proteins or transcomplementation experiments studying the spread of nonviral reporter proteins in the presence of only the putative movement protein.
The movement-defective PVX was altered to contain a frameshift leading to the loss of 72 C-terminal amino acid residues in the 25-kDa protein ORF (28). The ability of Pns6 to allow movement of the defective PVX indicates that this protein complements one of the functions of the 25-kDa protein. The 25-kDa protein was localized in the cell wall as a small punctate structure within or adjacent to PDs (29). Pns6 fused with GFP was also observed localized to the cell wall of N. tabacum cells, and unfused Pns6 was observed localized specifically to the PD of rice cells (Fig. 5 and 6A and B). The 25-kDa protein has ATP/GTPase activity, binds RNA, targets to a specific cellular compartment(s), moves from cell to cell when fused with eGFP, and has a helicase-like domain (14, 29, 48). Since the mutation in the 25-kDa protein ORF would delete a portion of the helicase domain, it is logical that this region may be critical for PVX cell-to-cell movement and that Pns6 complements the helicase activity missing in the mutant protein. Pns6 has no significant sequence similarity to any known plant viral movement proteins but has sequence similarity to yeast ATP-dependent RNA helicases (Li, unpublished results). Pns6 also is known to regulate the accumulation of and symptom severity induced by RDV (2). For Tobacco mosaic virus, it is known that the 126- or 183-kDa protein, which contain identical helicase-like sequences, also regulates virus accumulation and symptom severity (10, 39). Thus, all of these proteins have significant structural and functional similarities, and the 25-, 126-, and 183-kDa proteins have been shown to aid the cell-to-cell movement of their encoding virus. Further work is needed to determine whether Pns6 has helicase activity.
Recently, the 25-kDa protein has been shown to be a suppressor of RNA silencing (45). Although initial studies indicate that Pns6 is not a suppressor of silencing like the 2b, 19-kDa, 25-kDa, and HC-Pro viral proteins (15, 25, 45, 46; Li, unpublished results), further work is necessary to verify this finding. If Pns6 does not have suppressor activity, this would suggest that suppressor activity and virus movement are two different functions of the 25-kDa protein and that Pns6 complements only the movement function of this protein. Separating these activities would be of great interest to those studying virus movement and RNA silencing.
This work was supported by a National Outstanding Youth Grant of China (30125004); Rockefeller Foundation grant award RF93022; Allocation no. 236, National High Tech (863), China (contract no. 2001AA212131); a Natural Science Foundation of China grant to Y.L.; and a National Key Basic Research Program (973), China grant (contract no. G62000016204) to C.H.W.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»