Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2003, p. 2165-2173, Vol. 77, No. 3
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.3.2165-2173.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Viral Pathogenesis, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School,1 Biostatistics Department, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02215,5 Division of Comparative Pathology, New England Regional Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Southborough, Massachusetts 01772,2 Retroviral Pathogenesis Laboratory, AIDS Vaccine Program, SAIC Frederick, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, Maryland 20892,3 Bernhard-Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany,4 Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 277106
Received 27 August 2002/ Accepted 8 November 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The control or clearance of many viral infections follows the emergence of both cellular and humoral immune responses, suggesting that both components may contribute functionally to this process. Likewise, infection with HIV and the other primate lentiviruses results in the induction of both virus-specific antibodies and T cells (13). Clinical and experimental data have conclusively shown the importance of cellular immune responses mediated by CD8+ lymphocytes in controlling early replication of primate lentiviruses (8, 27). However, the potential for humoral immune responses to affect early HIV replication remains uncertain. HIV-specific antibodies, either alone or in conjunction with other components of the immune system, can act beneficially to limit virus replication (19, 22). However, virus-specific antibodies can also have undesirable effects by promoting virus accumulation and survival in lymphoid germinal centers (9, 26, 29). Furthermore, declining HIV-specific antibody titers have the potential to enhance infectivity (32).
Strong and broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies do arise in AIDS virus infections but appear later than cellular immune responses and fail to reach titers observed in other viral infections. This inability to generate more effective antibody responses may be due to viral cytopathicity directed against CD4+ T cells required for normal antigen recognition and B-cell response (3, 5). Pathological changes in lymph nodes following HIV infection ultimately result in germinal center destruction (30). Furthermore, antigenic variation and dense carbohydrate masking of neutralizing determinants on envelope glycoproteins may also hinder an effective humoral response (6). Nevertheless, observations in the nonhuman primate AIDS models illustrate the potential for antibody-mediated responses to contribute to protection.
SIVmac-infected rhesus macaques that undergo rapid disease progression fail to develop significant antiviral antibody titers (10, 14). Furthermore, numerous studies have shown that passive administration of antiviral antibodies can blunt primary viremia or completely block infection after experimental challenge, demonstrating the potentially beneficial effect of humoral immunity (1, 4, 7, 17, 18, 21-23). In the natural course of SIV infection, low-titer virus-specific antibodies are present at the time that primary viremia clears. Thus, it would be useful to understand their potential to contribute to early control of replication.
In the present study, we show that B-cell depletion at the time of inoculation with SIVmac251 delayed virus-specific humoral immunity for 2 weeks. Unlike persistent CD8+ lymphocyte depletion, which resulted in uncontrolled primary SIV viremia (27), the early control of high-level primary viremia was not significantly affected by the delay in SIV-specific antibodies. However, from postinoculation day 28 forward, neutralizing antibody titers were inversely correlated with levels of plasma virus, indicating that antibodies may contribute to the control of SIV replication.
|
|
|---|
In experiments to determine the effect of B-cell depletion on generation of cellular and humoral immune responses to tetanus toxoid, normal rhesus monkeys received a single intramuscular injection (0.5 ml) of tetanus toxoid (Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Swiftwater, Pa.) at the time of the first monoclonal antibody injection (day 0). Blood specimens were then obtained weekly through day 35 for measuring immune responses as described below.
In experiments designed to determine the effect of delaying SIV-specific antibody generation on the control of viremia, rhesus monkeys received anti-CD20 or control antibody treatments as described above. In a first experiment, two monkeys were inoculated on day 14 following initiation of anti-CD20 treatment with SIVmac strain 251 (equivalent to 3 x 106 copies of SIV RNA). Since the length of the B-cell depletion was quite heterogeneous (3 weeks and 3 months after SIV infection), we chose to inoculate another four monkeys on day 7 after initiation of the anti-CD20 treatment to ensure depletion of B cells during primary SIV infection. Animals were anesthetized with ketamine HCl for antibody administration, virus inoculation, and specimen collection. All animals were maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Animals for the Harvard Medical School and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, National Academic Press, Washington, D.C., 1996).
Antitetanus antibody and proliferation assays. Tetanus-specific antibodies were measured in plasma of immunized monkeys with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay similar to that described previously (25). Briefly, 96-well microtiter plates were coated overnight at 4°C with tetanus toxoid (tetanus toxoid, fluid, purified; Wyeth Laboratories, Marietta, Pa.) diluted 1:1,000 in phosphate-buffered saline, and the plates were then blocked with phosphate-buffered saline-2% nonfat dry milk. Plasma specimens (100 µl) were serially diluted and added to the plates, incubated for 1 h at room temperature, and then washed. Binding of monkey antibody to the plate was detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human immunoglobulin G (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pa.). After washing, 100 µl of tetramethylbenzidine (Kirkegard-Perry) was added to each well, the reaction was stopped after 20 min with H2SO4, and absorbance was read on at 490 nm. Endpoint plasma dilution was determined as the highest dilution to exceed the mean optical density + 2 standard deviations of the preimmunization specimen.
Cellular proliferative responses to tetanus antigen were quantified by culturing monkey peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained by density gradient centrifugation in RPMI 1640 supplemented with L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin, and 5% autologous preimmunization serum. Triplicate wells of 105 cells were incubated with tetanus antigen (tetanus toxoid, plain; Pasteur Mérieux Connaught; final dilution, 1:1,000) at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 6 days. During the last 6 h, cells were pulse labeled with [3H]thymidine, and incorporation into DNA was determined by routine harvesting of cells and liquid scintillography. The stimulation index was determined by dividing the median counts per minute from the tetanus toxoid-supplemented cultures by the median counts per minute from the control cultures.
Immunophenotyping and tetramer staining of peripheral blood lymphocytes.
Lymphocytes in peripheral blood were immunophenotyped with EDTA-anticoagulated blood specimens in a whole-blood lysis technique. Lymph node lymphocyte suspensions were obtained by gently teasing peripheral lymph node specimens that had been obtained by excisional biopsy. Cells in the lymph node cell suspension were adjusted to 106/ml in RPMI 1640-10% fetal bovine serum. Fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies were incubated with 100 µl of whole blood or lymph node cell suspension for 20 min at room temperature. Antibodies used were anti-CD3(FN18) conjugated to allophycocyanin, anti-CD4 conjugated to phycoerythrin (19Thy5D7), anti-CD8 conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (7PT-3F9), anti-CD8
ß conjugated to phycoerythrin-Texas Red (2ST8.5H7; Beckman Coulter), anti-CD19 conjugated to phycoerythrin (J4.119; Beckman Coulter), and anti-CD20 conjugated to phycoerythrin-Texas Red (B1; Beckman Coulter).
Specimens from monkeys expressing the major histocompatibility complex class I allele Mamu-A*01 were further analyzed for binding of Mamu-A*01/SIV Gag pllC tetrameric complexes as described previously (11). Erythrocytes were lysed with an ImmunoPrep reagent system and a TQ-Prep workstation (Beckman Coulter). To reduce the background level of staining, lysed samples were washed with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline, centrifuged for 3 min at 300 x g, and fixed in phosphate-buffered saline-1% formalin. Specimens were routinely analyzed for four-color immunofluorescence with a manually determined light-scatter gate for gating of lymphocytes. Absolute lymphocyte counts on blood specimens were obtained with a T540 hematology analyzer (Beckman Coulter).
Immunohistochemistry. Lymph node biopsy specimens were cut into two portions. One portion was snap-frozen and kept at -70°C until immunohistochemistry was performed. The second portion was used for preparation of single cells for flow cytometric evaluation of lymphocyte subsets as described above.
Immunohistochemical identification of lymphocytes in lymph nodes was performed on snap-frozen biopsy specimens that were sectioned (6 µm) on a cryostat and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 min. Sections were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline and incubated with monoclonal antibodies to CD20 (1:50; clone L26), Ki67 antigen (1:100; clone MIB-1), or follicular dendritic cells (1:200; clone R4/23) (all from Dakopatts, Copenhagen, Denmark). To detect CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, the sections were incubated either with a cocktail of anti-CD4 antibodies (Leu3a and M-T477 from BD-PharMingen, San Diego, Calif.) or with Leu2a (1:70; BD-PharMingen). Binding of primary antibodies was visualized by the alkaline phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase technique with New Fuchsin as the chromogen. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and mounted.
Plasma viral RNA levels. Virion-associated SIV RNA was measured in plasma samples with a real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay with a threshold sensitivity of 100 copy equivalents/ml and intra-assay coefficient of variation of <25% (16).
Neutralizing antibody titers to SIVmac251. Antibody-mediated neutralization of a T-cell-line-adapted stock of SIVmac251 was assessed in a CEMx174 cell-killing assay as previously described (20). Briefly, 50 µl of cell-free virus containing 500 50% tissue culture infectious doses was added to multiple dilutions of test serum in 100 µl of growth medium (RPMI 1640 with 12% fetal calf serum and 50 µg of gentamicin) in triplicate in 96-well culture plates. The mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, followed by the addition of CEMx174 cells (5 x 104 cells in 100 µl) to each well. Infection led to extensive syncytium formation and virus-induced cell killing in approximately 4 to 6 days in the absence of antibodies. Neutralization was measured by staining viable cells with Finter's neutral red in poly-L-lysine-coated plates. Percent protection was determined by calculating the difference in absorption (A540) between test wells (cells plus serum sample plus virus) and virus control wells (cells plus virus), dividing this result by the difference in absorption between cell control wells (cells only) and virus control wells and multiplying by 100.
Neutralization was measured at a time when virus-induced cell killing in virus control wells was greater than 70% but less than 100%. Neutralizing titers are given as the reciprocal dilution required to protect 50% of cells from virus-induced killing. The cell-free stock of SIVmac251 was prepared in H9 cells.
Statistical analysis and data presentation. Assay results at a particular follow-up time (e.g., neutralizing antibody titer or plasma SIV RNA) were compared between controls and CD20-depleted animals with the exact Wilcoxon rank sum test. For each animal, the slope over time of plasma SIV RNA (and log10 plasma SIV RNA) was computed by ordinary least squares, and the resultant slopes were compared between controls and CD20-depleted animals with the exact Wilcoxon rank sum test. All significance levels were two-sided. The test of correlation of neutralizing antibodies and plasma SIV RNA used the Spearman rank correlation test. Plots were done with Microsoft PowerPoint 2000. When points were plotted on a log scale, the medians were calculated on the log scale.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Administration of anti-CD20 antibody depleted rhesus macaques of peripheral blood B cells. Two normal rhesus macaques received anti-CD20 (20 mg/kg of body weight) or an isotype-matched control antibody on days 0, 7, and 14. Control antibody had no effect on the number of CD20+ B cells in peripheral blood (A). However, administration of anti-CD20 antibody resulted in rapid loss of CD20+ B cells (B).
|
![]() View larger version (92K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Anti-CD20 antibody depleted B cells from lymph nodes. Prior to anti-CD20 treatment, morphologically normal germinal centers (arrows) contained a normal distribution of B cells (A) and abundant anti-Ki67 staining cells in the germinal center dark zone, indicating many proliferating cells (B). At 14 and 28 days after anti-CD20 treatment, a marked reduction in the number of CD20+ B cells is evident; the follicular dendritic cell network is stained with this antibody, indicating that a proportion of injected chimeric anti-CD20 antibody is captured by these cells (C and E). Parallel with this, the decrease in the number of Ki67+ proliferating B cells within the germinal center and fewer Ki67+ proliferating cells were evident (D and F).
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Anti-CD20-mediated B-cell depletion inhibited humoral but not cellular immune responses. (A) Plasma titers of anti-tetanus toxoid antibody were substantially lower in anti-CD20-treated rhesus macaques than antibody-treated monkeys when immunized during antibody treatment. (B) Control antibody- and anti-CD20 antibody-treated rhesus macaques generated equivalent tetanus toxoid-specific cell proliferative responses in vitro.
|
B-cell depletion delayed appearance of SIVmac-specific antibody responses but did not affect clearance of primary viremia. We used this model of B-cell depletion to assess whether anti-SIV antibodies might play a contributory role in reducing primary viremia. Six rhesus monkeys received three weekly injections of anti-CD20 or control antibody with the regimen described above. All were inoculated with SIVmac251 on day 7 or day 14 of treatment. B cells were depleted from the blood for 1 to 3 months (median, 6 weeks) in anti-CD20-treated monkeys (data not shown), resulting in a reduction of B cells during the first 4 weeks of SIV infection. The appearance of neutralizing antibodies against SIVmac251 occurred significantly later in the CD20-depleted animals (P = 0.03) Furthermore, the median anti-SIV neutralizing titer was at least one log lower in B-cell-depleted monkeys compared to controls at both 21 days (P = 0.02) and 28 days (P = 0.04) (Fig. 4A and B).
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. B-cell depletion resulted in a delay in appearance of SIV-specific neutralizing antibodies but had no effect on control of primary SIVmac251 viremia. Prior to inoculation with SIVmac251, rhesus macaques were depleted of B cells by receiving three anti-CD20 antibody treatments (20 mg/kg of body weight) or received an equivalent amount of a control antibody. The appearance of neutralizing antibodies was delayed and the median titer was significantly lower at day 28 in B-cell-depleted macaques (A) than in control-antibody-treated macaques (B). Despite the inhibition in neutralizing antibodies, the control of primary viremia (plasma virus level at days 10 to 28, linear slope of plasma virus decline between peak and day 28) was no different in B-cell-depleted macaques (C) than in control-antibody-treated macaques (D).
|
Higher neutralizing antibody titers correlated with lower levels of plasma virus during the postacute phase of infection. Neutralizing antibody titers were quite similar among the control-antibody-treated monkeys by day 28 (Fig. 4A). However, the anti-CD20-treated monkeys showed more heterogenous titers of neutralizing antibodies (Fig. 4B). We therefore determined whether neutralizing antibody titers correlated with the level of plasma virus among the B-cell-depleted monkeys. As shown in Fig. 5 and Table 1, neutralizing antibody titers and the level of plasma virus did show a significant inverse correlation on postinoculation days 28 and 56. The same correlation was close to significance on day 21. A similar correlation was not evident among the control-antibody-treated group because of a relative lack of variability in neutralizing antibody titers and the smaller group size. Although animals with normal and delayed SIV-specific humoral immune responses showed equivalent abilities to reduce levels of primary viremia; this observation supports a role for neutralizing antibodies during the postacute phase of SIV infection.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Relationship between neutralizing antibody titer and plasma virus level among B-cell-depleted and control-antibody-treated monkeys. On postinoculation days 28 and 56, the six B-cell-depleted monkeys showed an inverse correlation between neutralizing antibody titer and plasma virus. Significant correlations were not seen in B-cell-depleted monkeys on day 21 or among control-antibody-treated monkeys at any of these time points.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Correlation of virus levels in plasma with neutralizing antibody titers
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. In B-cell-depleted macaques, control of viremia coincided with appearance of SIV-specific cellular immune responses. The appearance of SIV-specific CD8 T-cell immune responses detected by using Mamu-A*01/SIV Gag tetramers appeared at the same time as the decline in plasma virus in Mamu-A*01+ rhesus macaques infected with SIV was observed. (A) Control-antibody-treated monkey. (B) Representative anti-CD20 antibody-treated monkey.
|
|
|
|---|
Both binding and neutralizing antibodies emerge in association with the decline in primary viremia during SIV infection of normal rhesus monkeys. Admittedly, the antibody titer and the breadth of response are quite limited at these early postinoculation time points. However, it remains conceivable that antibodies elicited early may contribute to viral clearance. We demonstrated that depletion of CD20+ B cells significantly inhibited antibody responses to tetanus toxoid in normal monkeys and delayed the humoral immune responses in monkeys infected with SIV. This delay in SIV-specific antibody had no measurable effect on the clearance of primary viremia through day 28 when assessed by differences in plasma virus level or the median slope of decline in plasma virus. However, admittedly low-titer antibody responses had developed in some animals by day 21. In contrast, inhibition of cellular immune responses by depletion of CD8+ lymphocytes during the same period resulted in persistence of peak levels of virus replication (27). Resolution of primary viremia over the first 4 weeks of infection did correspond with the appearance of SIV Gag-specific CD8+ T cells in the three Mamu-A*0+ monkeys embedded in the B-cell-depleted group and in the one control-antibody-treated monkey tested. Thus, we found that primary viremia declined during the first 4 weeks of infection despite a delay in humoral immune responses.
More variability in neutralizing antibody titers occurred in B-cell-depleted monkeys than in the control-antibody-treated group. In fact, antibody responses were never detected in one B-cell-depleted monkey that subsequently showed a disease course typical of a "rapid progressor." Since this pattern of disease progression occurs in about one-fourth of all SIVmac251 infections, it is unclear whether B-cell depletion played a role in the clinical course of this monkey. Because the B-cell-depleted group exhibited a wider variation in neutralizing antibody titers than the control group, we were able to show an inverse correlation between neutralizing antibody titers and level of plasma virus. This finding supports a contributing role for virus-specific antibody in controlling SIV replication.
It must be noted, however, that the role of antibody in the immunopathophysiology of "rapid progressor" animals remains unclear. The high level of viremia and accelerated disease progression may, indeed, result directly from a failure to develop neutralizing antibody responses. Alternatively, the absence of a significant humoral response may represent a surrogate marker for a rapidly progressing disease course, wherein robust virus replication and acute immunodeficiency prevent the generation of antibody responses. Unfortunately, these studies do not help to elucidate the dynamic relationship between virus replication and humoral immune responses in this unique subset of animals with an accelerated disease course.
Clinicopathologic observations and experimental studies strongly support a role for anti-SIV antibody responses. First, it is well established that neutralizing antibodies in SIV-infected macaques broaden in specificity over time. Macaques that fail to develop this neutralizing antibody response progress rapidly to AIDS. Second, several experimental studies have demonstrated that either immunoglobulin from SIV-infected macaques or anti-SIV-HIV monoclonal antibodies can have potent effects in either blocking or modifying the course of infection (1, 4, 7, 17, 18, 21, 23).
Thus, it would appear that antibodies against the primate lentiviruses can exert control over infection if present in sufficiently broad specificity and high titer. Our studies support mechanisms other than antibodies in the control of primary SIV viremia. Taken together, these studies suggest that early control of SIV replication in the naïve host is accomplished primarily by CD8 effector T-cell-mediated responses. However, these results show the potential for antibodies to act in concert with cellular immune responses to control virus replication.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»