JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engle, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Engle, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, M. S.
Journal of Virology, December 2003, p. 12941-12949, Vol. 77, No. 24
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.24.12941-12949.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antibody Prophylaxis and Therapy against West Nile Virus Infection in Wild-Type and Immunodeficient Mice

Michael J. Engle1 and Michael S. Diamond1,2,3*

Departments of Medicine,1 Pathology & Immunology,2 Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri3

Received 21 May 2003/ Accepted 5 September 2003


   ABSTRACT
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and METHODS
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne Flavivirus that causes encephalitis in a subset of susceptible humans. Current treatment for WNV infections is supportive, and no specific therapy or vaccine is available. In this study, we directly tested the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of polyclonal antibodies against WNV. Passive administration of human gamma globulin or mouse serum prior to WNV infection protected congenic wild-type, B-cell-deficient (µMT), and T- and B-cell-deficient (RAG1) C57BL/6J mice. Notably, no increased mortality due to immune enhancement was observed. Although immune antibody completely prevented morbidity and mortality in wild-type mice, its effect was not durable in immunocompromised mice: many µMT and RAG1 mice eventually succumbed to infection. Thus, antibody by itself did not completely eliminate viral reservoirs in host tissues, consistent with an intact cellular immune response being required for viral clearance. In therapeutic postexposure studies, human gamma globulin partially protected against WNV-induced mortality. In µMT mice, therapy had to be initiated within 2 days of infection to gain a survival benefit, whereas in the wild-type mice, therapy even 5 days after infection reduced mortality. This time point is significant because between days 4 and 5, WNV was detected in the brains of infected mice. Thus, passive transfer of immune antibody improves clinical outcome even after WNV has disseminated into the central nervous system.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and METHODS
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A member of the Flavivirus genus of the Flaviviridae family, West Nile virus (WNV) is a neurotropic enveloped virus with a single-stranded, positive-polarity 11-kb RNA genome. WNV cycles primarily between mosquitoes and birds but also infects humans, horses, and a variety of other vertebrate species. It is endemic in parts of Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, and outbreaks throughout the United States during the past 4 years indicate that it has established its presence in the Western hemisphere. Humans develop a febrile illness that can progress rapidly to a meningitis or encephalitis syndrome (32). Infants, the elderly, and patients with impaired immune systems are at greatest risk for severe neurological disease (5, 32, 63).

At present, treatment for all flavivirus infections, including WNV, is supportive. Based on studies in cell culture, ribavirin (33) and alpha interferon (4) have been proposed as candidate antiviral agents against WNV, yet neither has demonstrated efficacy in vivo. Although antibody has been used for therapy against several viral infections (53, 67), with the exception of its prophylactic use against tick-borne encephalitis virus (52), it has not been used against flaviviral infections in humans. Although few data are available with respect to WNV infection, animal studies have provided information on how antibodies mediate protection against flavivirus infections. Most neutralizing antibodies recognize the structural E protein, although a subset against another virion-associated protein, the prM or membrane protein (13, 19, 48, 64), have also been described. Several groups also have generated nonneutralizing yet protective monoclonal antibodies against NS1 (14, 20, 31, 50, 54, 55, 57, 58), a protein that is absent from the virion. Thus, protection against flavivirus infections in vivo does not necessarily correlate with neutralizing activity in vitro (8, 51, 56). The ability to cure mice of flavivirus infection with immune serum or monoclonal antibodies depends on the dosage and time of administration (12, 34, 47, 52), and polyclonal antibodies that prevent infection against one flavivirus do not provide durable cross-protection against heterologous flaviviruses (9, 52).

Although these studies suggest that antibodies could have a potential therapeutic role, there are concerns that treatment could exacerbate flavivirus infection. Subneutralizing concentrations of antibody enhance flavivirus replication in myeloid cells in vitro (10, 11, 21, 22, 44-46) and thus could complicate the therapeutic administration of antibodies. This phenomenon of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (ADE) may contribute to a pathological cytokine cascade that occurs during secondary dengue virus infection and causes a severe hemorrhagic syndrome (27, 28, 36, 41); despite its extensive characterization in vitro, the significance of ADE in vivo with WNV or other flaviviruses remains uncertain.

Apart from or perhaps related to ADE, an "early-death" phenomenon (41) has been reported that could also limit the utility of antibody therapy against WNV. According to this model, animals that have existing humoral immunity but do not respond well to viral challenge may succumb to infection more rapidly than animals without existing immunity. Although it has been described after passive acquisition of antibodies against yellow fever and Langat encephalitis viruses (6, 23, 24, 65), this phenomenon was not observed after transfer of monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against Japanese encephalitis virus (34) or tick-borne encephalitis virus (35).

Because of the expanding WNV epidemic, it is critical to evaluate novel therapeutic strategies, such as immunotherapy, in a well-defined model of WNV encephalitis. Individual case reports have suggested that administration of pooled gamma globulin to humans may improve outcome after WNV infection (30, 61). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of polyclonal antibodies as immune prophylaxis and treatment of WNV infection in immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice. Passive administration of immune antibodies prior to WNV infection protected wild-type and T- and B-cell-deficient C57BL/6J mice. Although antibody completely prevented morbidity in wild-type mice, many immunocompromised mice eventually succumbed to infection at later time points. Thus, immune antibody, by itself, limited infection but did not completely eliminate viral reservoirs in host tissues. In therapeutic studies, immune gamma globulin partially protected against WNV-induced mortality. Initiation of antibody therapy even after WNV had spread to the central nervous system (CNS) still improved clinical outcome.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and METHODS
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cells and viruses. BHK-21, Vero, and C6/36 Aedes albopictus cells were cultured as previously described (15, 16). The WNV strain 3000.0259 was isolated in New York in 2000 (18) and obtained from Laura Kramer (Albany, N.Y.). The initial isolate was harvested after inoculating a mosquito homogenate into Vero cells (passage 0). All cell culture and in vivo studies used a stock (2.6 x 108 PFU/ml) of this virus that was propagated (passage 1) once in C6/36 cells. Viruses were diluted and injected into mice as previously described (17).

Mouse experiments. All mice used in these experiments were derived from the inbred C57BL/6J strain (H-2b). The wild-type C57BL/6J and congenic B-cell-deficient (µMT) mice (strain B6 Igh6-6tm1Cgn) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine). The congenic RAG1 mice (strain B6 RAG1tm1Mom) were a gift from E. Unanue, Washington University School of Medicine. Mice were used between 5 and 8 weeks of age, depending on the particular experiment, and inoculated subcutaneously with WNV by footpad injection after anesthetization with xylazine and ketamine. Fur ruffling, hunchback posture, and weight loss were used as markers for WNV-associated morbidity. Mouse experiments were approved and performed according to the guidelines of the Washington University School of Medicine Animal Safety Committee.

Serum and antibody preparations. To obtain immune sera, wild-type mice that had survived primary WNV infection were maintained for 28 days, anesthetized, and phlebotomized. Serum was collected, and after heat inactivation (30 min at 56°C), aliquoted, and stored at -80°C. Purified human gamma globulin was obtained commercially (Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.) from a region of WNV endemicity (Israel) which has had repeated outbreaks over the past few years. Approximately 10 to 20% of Israeli blood donors have antibodies that react with WNV proteins. Several batches of pooled human gamma globulin (50 mg of IgG per ml) were tested for reactivity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against WNV antigens and by plaque reduction neutralization (PRNT) assay (17). Nonimmune human gamma globulin (50 mg of IgG per ml) was obtained from a region where WNV is not endemic (Midwestern United States, 2000) and lacked immunoreactivity as judged by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and PRNT assays.

Antibody administration experiments. For passive transfer of sera, wild-type and immunodeficient mice were administered the indicated doses of serum by intraperitoneal injection 1 day prior to and after inoculation with 102 PFU of WNV. In experiments with human gamma globulin, mice were administered a single dose of immune or nonimmune purified IgG by intraperitoneal injection at the same time as or at different times after footpad inoculation of WNV.

Quantitation of viral burden in mice. For analysis of virus in tissues of infected mice, titrations were performed by plaque assay on BHK-21 cells as described previously (16, 17). Viral RNA from serum and tissues was harvested and quantitated with real-time fluorogenic reverse transcription-PCR as described previously (17).

Quantitation of antibodies. The titer of neutralizing antibodies was determined by a standard PRNT assay (17, 29). Results were plotted and the titer for 50% inhibition (PRNT50) was calculated. To determine the immune IgG titers, a WNV antigen ELISA was used (17, 62). The human gamma globulin preparations used in this study had the following titers: nonimmune gamma globulin F43312: ELISA, <1/10; PRNT50, <1/10; immune gamma globulin G12101: ELISA, 1/900; PRNT50, 1/50; G24191: ELISA, 1/900, PRNT50, 1/100.

Statistical analysis. Differences in outcome were assessed after Kaplan-Meier survival curves with a log rank test. Differences in average survival time were determined by a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.


   RESULTS
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and METHODS
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Previously, we demonstrated that antibody prevented dissemination of WNV infection in C57BL/6J mice (17). Passive administration of immune mouse serum protected wild-type and congenic B-cell-deficient (strain µMT) mice against lethal infection. At 21 days after infection, all µMT mice that received immune serum remained alive (17) and showed no evidence of morbidity (fur ruffling, hunchback posture, or weight loss). Although these studies demonstrated that antibody was required for protection, it remained unclear whether it was sufficient for viral clearance. To evaluate this, the time courses were extended (Fig. 1).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. (A) Passive administration of mouse serum to µMT mice. Serum was collected from immune (day 28 postinfection; titer {approx}1/10,000) wild-type mice and pooled. After heat inactivation, the indicated amounts of serum were administered in a divided dose to µMT mice 1 day prior to and after infection with 102 PFU of WNV. Data reflect between 5 and 10 mice per condition. (B) Passive administration of mouse serum to RAG1 mice. Immune serum (1 ml) or PBS was administered in a divided dose to RAG1 mice 1 day prior to and after infection with 102 PFU of WNV. Data reflect between 5 and 10 mice per condition.

 
Passive transfer of pooled mouse immune serum (titer by ELISA, 1/10,000) completely protected µMT mice against lethal infection for approximately 30 days. However, protection waned over time and depended on the initial dose of immune serum; 89% of µMT mice that were administered 0.1 ml of immune serum survived for greater than 35 days, but only 11% survived after 50 days. In contrast, all µMT mice that received 1.0 ml of immune serum were alive at 40 days, and 75% were alive after 60 days (Fig. 1A). In congenic RAG1 mice that lacked both B and T cells, the duration of protection was shorter. Although 100% of RAG1 mice that were administered 1.0 ml of immune serum were alive at 30 days, all mice succumbed to WNV infection within 52 days of the initial infection (Fig. 1B). Although infectious virus was recovered when immunocompromised mice became morbid, no virus was recovered at 35 days after infection, when mice appeared healthy (data not shown). In contrast, immunocompetent wild-type C57BL/6 mice that received immune serum did not develop WNV-associated disease even months after the initial infection (data not shown) (17). Although neutralizing antibodies effectively controlled WNV infection, in the absence of a functional B- and T-cell response, virus infection was not completely eradicated.

Prophylaxis studies with gamma globulin. Passive transfer of immune serum against WNV provided long-lasting protection against infection in wild-type and immunodeficient mice. To confirm that antibodies mediated this protection and explore the possibility for antibody therapy against WNV, we evaluated the efficacy of purified immune human gamma globulin against WNV infection in mice. Human gamma globulin with immunoreactivity against WNV was obtained from donors in Israel. Over the past several years, a series of WNV epidemics have occurred in Israel, so that 10 to 20% of the population has antibodies against WNV (61).

For this study, two immune human gamma globulin lots were used: G12101 and G24191 had significant in vitro immunoreactivity (ELISA titers of 1/900 against WNV antigen) and neutralizing (PRNT50 of 1/50 to 1/100) potential. Nonimmune human gamma globulin was obtained from a region where WNV was nonendemic and lacked neutralizing activity or immunoreactivity. In vivo studies with human gamma globulin were performed in 8-week-old wild-type and µMT B-cell-deficient C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 2). Administration of a single dose of 0.2 mg (10 mg/kg) or greater of immune gamma globulin completely protected wild-type mice against infection with 102 PFU of WNV (Fig. 2A). Doses of 0.02 mg (1.0 mg/kg) and 0.002 mg (0.1 mg/kg) were less effective. In contrast, administration of nonimmune gamma globulin did not protect against WNV infection. Because subneutralizing concentrations of antibodies can facilitate enhanced WNV infection in myeloid cells (10, 21, 22), we investigated the effect of very low doses of immune gamma globulin on WNV infection in mice. Notably, treatment of wild-type mice with the lowest dose (0.0002 mg or less) did not induce excess mortality.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. Prophylaxis studies with human gamma globulin. (A) Passive administration of human immune gamma globulin to 8-week-old wild-type mice. The indicated amounts of purified immune gamma globulin (lot G12101) were administered as a single dose via an intraperitoneal route immediately prior to administration of 102 PFU of WNV via footpad inoculation. Data reflect at least 20 mice per condition. Statistical differences compared to the PBS control were as follows: 0.2 µg, 2 µg, and 20 µg, P > 0.3; 200 µg, 1,000 µg, 5,000 µg, and 10,000 µg, P <= 0.0002. (B) Passive administration of human immune gamma globulin to 8-week-old µMT mice. The indicated amounts of purified immune gamma globulin (lot G12101) were administered as a single dose via an intraperitoneal route immediately prior to administration of 102 PFU of WNV via footpad inoculation. Statistical differences compared to the PBS control were as follows: immune IgG: 200 µg, P > 0.3; 1,000 µg, P = 0.0002; 5,000 µg, P = 0.009; 10,000 µg, P < 0.0001; and nonimmune IgG: 10,000 µg, P > 0.7.

 
In general, passive transfer of immune gamma globulin to µMT mice provided significant yet lower levels of protection compared to wild-type mice (Fig. 2B). Although doses greater than 0.2 mg increased the average survival time of µMT mice after infection, only those that received 10 mg (500 mg/kg) survived beyond 30 days. This was even more apparent with RAG1 mice. Although survival was prolonged, even a high dose of immune gamma globulin (10 mg) did not protect against WNV-induced mortality for greater than 20 days (data not shown). Overall, these results were similar to that obtained with immune serum (Fig. 1) and confirmed that antibodies against WNV were necessary but not sufficient to eliminate WNV infection in vivo.

To better understand the mechanism of inhibition by antibody, we evaluated the effects of immune and nonimmune human gamma globulin on the viral load in serum and the CNS during the early stages after infection of µMT mice.

(i) Viremia. The administration of a single dose (10 mg) of immune gamma globulin to µMT mice completely abolished viremia after subcutaneous inoculation with 102 PFU of WNV (Fig. 3A): at days 2, 4, 6, and 8 after infection, neither infectious virus nor viral RNA (data not shown) was detected in the serum of µMT mice. In contrast, in µMT mice that were administered a single dose of nonimmune gamma globulin, after day 2, {approx}102 to 104 PFU of infectious virus per ml was recovered from serum (Fig. 3A).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. WNV burden in serum and the CNS in µMT mice after treatment with immune or nonimmune human gamma globulin. (A) Infectious virus levels in peripheral serum. µMT mice were treated immediately prior to infection with 10 mg of immune (lot G24191) or nonimmune (lot F43312) human gamma globulin. Serum was harvested at the indicated days, and virus levels were measured with a viral plaque assay in BHK21 cells. Data are shown as the average number of PFU per milliliter of serum and reflect at least three mice per time point. The dotted line represents the limit of sensitivity of the assay. (B) Infectious virus levels in the brain. Virus levels were determined in the brain after homogenization by plaque assay and normalized per gram of tissue. (C) Infectious virus levels in the spinal cord. Virus levels were determined from the spinal cord as described above.

 
(ii) CNS. Passive transfer of 10 mg of immune gamma globulin had more variable effects on viral burden in the brain and spinal cord of µMT mice (Fig. 3B and C). Although most mice demonstrated no detectable infectious virus in the CNS within the first 6 days of infection, by day 8 a subset of mice had 104 to 105 PFU of infectious virus per g in the brain and spinal cord. In contrast, by day 8 after infection, µMT mice that received nonimmune gamma globulin uniformly had high levels (106 to 109 PFU/g) of infectious virus at several independent sites in the CNS. Thus, although prophylaxis with immune gamma globulin appeared to completely block WNV viremia in µMT mice, it did not prevent dissemination to the CNS in a subset of mice.

Therapeutic studies with gamma globulin. Because of the lack of specific treatment against WNV infection, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of immune gamma globulin. Mice were inoculated with 102 PFU of WNV at day 0 and then administered a single dose (15 mg; 750 mg/kg) of immune or nonimmune gamma globulin at a particular day after infection and followed clinically. Initial studies were performed with the immunodeficient µMT mice. As expected, nonimmune gamma globulin demonstrated no clinical improvement compared to the PBS controls: all mice succumbed to infection (Fig. 4A). Immune gamma globulin, by contrast, had a modest therapeutic effect. µMT mice treated at day 1 or 2 after infection had an 80 and 20% survival rate, respectively. Treatment of µMT mice with immune gamma globulin after day 2 had no significant effect on mortality or average survival time (Fig. 4B).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Therapeutic studies with human gamma globulin in 8-week-old µMT mice. A single 15-mg dose of purified nonimmune (panel A, lot F43312) or immune (panel B, lot G24191) gamma globulin was administered via an intraperitoneal route immediately prior to (day 0) or at the indicated day after (day 1, 2, or 3) administration of 102 PFU of WNV via footpad inoculation. Data reflect between 5 and 10 mice per condition. Statistical differences compared to the PBS control were as follows: immune IgG: day 0, P < 0.005; day 1, P < 0.005; day 2, P = 0.06, day 3, P = 0.12; and nonimmune IgG: days 0, 1, 2, and 3, P > 0.4.

 
Preliminary therapeutic studies were also performed in 8-week-old wild-type C57BL/6J mice. Because the survival rate after subcutaneous inoculation with WNV was {approx}70% (17), although immune gamma globulin therapy (10 mg) at days 1, 2, and 3 after infection improved survival rates, the absolute benefit was small (data not shown), and large numbers of mice would be required to attain statistical power. Instead, therapeutic trials with gamma globulin were conducted with 5-week-old wild-type mice; because only 13% of these mice survived infection with WNV in the absence of therapy (Fig. 5A), the possibility for mortality benefit was greater. Treatment of 5-week-old mice with PBS or nonimmune gamma globulin had no significant effect on average survival time or mortality (Fig. 5B). In contrast, treatment with immune gamma globulin 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 days after infection increased the average survival time and decreased mortality rates (Fig. 5C and Table 1).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. Therapeutic studies with human gamma globulin in 5-week-old wild-type mice. (A) Survival curve of 5-week-old wild-type mice. Mice were inoculated via footpad with diluent (mock) or 102 PFU of WNV. The survival curves were constructed with data from two independent experiments. The number of animals for each viral dose ranged from 6 (mock) to 23 (102 PFU). The difference in survival curves was statistically significant: P < 0.001. (B) A single 15-mg dose of purified nonimmune (lot F43312) gamma globulin was administered via an intraperitoneal route to 5-week-old wild-type mice immediately prior to (day 0) or at the indicated day after (day 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) administration of 102 PFU of WNV via footpad inoculation. Data reflect approximately 20 mice per condition. Significance values for mortality and average survival times are indicated in Table 1. (C) A single dose of 15 mg of purified immune (lot G24191) gamma globulin was administered to 5-week-old wild-type mice via an intraperitoneal route immediately prior to (day 0) or at the indicated day after (day 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) administration of 102 PFU of WNV via footpad inoculation. Data reflect approximately 20 mice per condition. Significance values for mortality and average survival times are indicated in Table 1. (D) WNV burden in the brain of 5-week-old wild-type mice. Five-week-old mice were treated with a single 15-mg dose of immune (lot G24191) or nonimmune (lot F43312) human gamma globulin immediately prior to infection with 102 PFU of WNV. At days 4 and 5 after infection, brains were harvested and viral burdens were determined by plaque assay after tissue homogenization. The data are expressed as PFU per gram. The following percentage of mice had viral burdens below detection (<20 PFU/g): immune IgG: day 4, 100%; day 5, 100%; nonimmune IgG: day 4, 66%; day 5, 0%.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Results of therapeutic trials with human gamma globulina

 
Because therapy with immune gamma globulin provided a beneficial effect even 5 days after initial infection, we hypothesized that antibody limited disease even after WNV had spread to the CNS. To confirm this, the levels of infectious virus were measured in the brain of 5-week-old mice after infection with 102 PFU of WNV (Fig. 5D). When nonimmune gamma globulin was administered, 33 and 100% of 5-week-old mice developed measurable viral burdens in the brain at days 4 and 5 postinfection, respectively. In contrast, if mice were treated with immune gamma globulin, no virus was detected in the brain at days 4 and 5 after infection. Collectively, these data indicate that passive transfer of immune antibody improved clinical outcome even after WNV had disseminated into the CNS.


   DISCUSSION
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and METHODS
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The efficacy of pre- and postexposure protection by homologous and heterologous polyclonal antibodies against WNV was evaluated in immunocompetent and immunocompromised mice. These experiments were undertaken because of the lack of available therapy against WNV and because recent human case reports suggest that gamma globulin administration may improve clinical outcome (30, 61). We found that passive administration of immune human gamma globulin or mouse serum prior to WNV infection protected wild-type, µMT, and RAG1 mice from morbidity and mortality. Although immune antibody completely prevented morbidity in wild-type mice, its effect was not durable in mice that lacked T and B cells, as they ultimately succumbed to infection at delayed times. In postexposure therapeutic studies, heterologous human gamma globulin partially protected mice against WNV-induced mortality. For µMT mice, therapy had to be initiated within 2 days of infection to gain a survival benefit. In contrast, for wild-type mice, therapy that was initiated even 5 days after infection reduced mortality; this time point is significant because between days 4 and 5 WNV was produced in the CNS.

Preexposure prophylaxis with homologous or heterologous antibodies protected wild-type mice against WNV-induced morbidity and mortality. The degree of protection was associated with the amount of antibody transferred and no mortality was observed above a dose of 10 mg/kg. These results are consistent with other studies that demonstrate protection against flaviviruses after passive acquisition of antibodies (8, 9, 12, 34, 35, 40, 52, 56, 59). Notably, immune enhancement was not observed after passive transfer of low doses of immune gamma globulin; even when 200 ng (10 µg/kg) of antibody was administered, there was no evidence of increased lethality or reduced average survival time. This dose is significant because it readily facilitated ADE of the U937 myeloid cell line in cell culture (M. S. Diamond, unpublished observations). Thus, as has been observed for tick-borne encephalitis virus (35), ADE in cell culture did not necessarily predict clinical outcome in vivo.

The prophylaxis experiments with immunocompromised mice also provide insight into the pathogenesis of WNV infection. Although passive transfer of high-titer immune serum against WNV prior to infection delayed the onset of disease, most µMT and RAG1 mice ultimately succumbed to WNV infection. Thus, antibody by itself was not sufficient to prevent and/or eliminate WNV infection from all cellular compartments; an intact cellular immune response was required for viral eradication. These results are consistent with our recent experiments that demonstrate that mice that lack CD8+ T cells have excess viral burden in the CNS and increased mortality (B. Shrestha and M. S. Diamond, manuscript in preparation). These studies also agree with experiments with a neuroadapted Sindbis alphavirus in which passive administration of immune serum abolished viral replication in SCID mice; however, when these antibody titers declined infectious virus was again produced (25, 37, 39). Thus, antibody-mediated protection against WNV likely occurs through a mechanism that does not cause lysis of infected cells (25, 38, 39).

µMT mice that received nonimmune antibody prior to infection developed a sustained viremia within 4 days of infection, results that agree with our published studies (17). In contrast, after the acquisition of immune gamma globulin, at the limits of detection of our assays (1 PFU/ml by fluorogenic reverse transcription-PCR, 20 PFU/ml by plaque assay) viremia was never observed. Nonetheless, within 6 days of infection, a subset of µMT mice that received immune gamma globulin had evidence of infectious virus in the brain and spinal cord. These data suggest that antibody alone efficiently blocked the hematogenous phase of viral infection but was less effective at controlling spread to the CNS. It is possible that some WNV enters the CNS by a nonhematogenous route, through a process that is not accessible to antibody-mediated inhibition, such as retrograde axonal transport from infected peripheral neurons (2, 42). Alternatively, very low levels of WNV, which were below the limit of detection by fluorogenic reverse transcription-PCR, may be sufficient for CNS dissemination in immunocompromised mice.

Our studies with immunodeficient mice suggest that under certain conditions WNV can establish a state of persistence. Treatment of µMT and RAG1 mice with homologous high-titer immune serum facilitated long-term but not permanent protection against WNV. Given the lack of evidence for latency with flaviviruses, it is likely that in the presence of antibodies but absence of an adaptive cellular immune response, low-level WNV infection was ongoing. Persistence of WNV infection has been described in the brains of experimentally infected monkeys (49) and hamsters (66). Similar viral persistence has been reported in animals infected with Japanese and tick-borne encephalitis viruses (43, 60). In contrast, we did not observe WNV persistence in wild-type mice that survived infection; virus could not be cultivated from wild-type mouse brain or spinal cord homogenates weeks or months after infection (B. Shrestha and M. S. Diamond, unpublished observations). Based on the observation of flavivirus persistence in brain tissues, neurons may act as reservoirs for persistent infection. Alternatively, other cells in the CNS (e.g., microglia, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes) could sustain low-level WNV replication and facilitate dissemination in immunocompromised mice as antibody titers waned.

Therapeutic trials in 5-week-old wild-type mice demonstrated that heterologous and relatively low-titer immune gamma globulin against WNV significantly depressed mortality after infection. As expected, greater intervals between infection and treatment were associated with decreased clinical benefit. Nonetheless, even when antibody was administered 4 to 5 days after subcutaneous infection, a 20 to 35% improvement in mortality rate and average survival time was observed. Clinical improvement after day 5 administration of antibody was significant because virologic analysis indicated that WNV disseminated to the brain of 5-week-old mice as early as day 4 but uniformly by day 5 after infection. Thus, passive transfer of immune antibody improved clinical outcome even after WNV had spread into the CNS; these results agree with prior studies with yellow fever, St. Louis encephalitis, and Sindbis viruses (8, 26, 39, 52). In contrast, protection against tick-borne encephalitis with antibodies was possible only before infection of the brain was established (35). Clearly, the issue of treatment after dissemination to the CNS is complex; the results may be influenced by additional factors including the age and genetic background of the mice, the route of inoculation, and the relative titers of the antibodies.

The lack of available therapy and the expanding WNV epidemic necessitate the evaluation of agents that inhibit infection and can be rapidly transferred into the clinical setting. Polyclonal antibody preparations have been used sparingly against flaviviruses because of concerns about ADE (27, 41). In the present study, clinically significant immune enhancement was not observed. Although antibody therapy against WNV could be complicated in regions where heterologous flaviviruses cocirculate, because homologous IgG is cleared with a half-life of approximately 20 days (3), this risk is temporary. In wild-type mice, prophylaxis was effective across a broad range of doses. For immunocompromised mice, higher doses of antibody were required and even then, protection was incomplete. In theory, sustained protection could be generated in the immunocompromised with repeated dosing regimens. In postexposure therapeutic trials in mice, gamma globulin therapy decreased mortality rates, results that agree with those recently reported by another group (7). Clearly, trials in primates and/or humans are the next step to confirm the efficacy and safety of passive antibody protection and treatment against WNV infection (1).


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank G. Weil, T. Chambers, A. Pekosz, D. Leib, L. Morrison, P. Olivo, P. Stuart, and their laboratories for experimental advice. We thank D. Leib, P. Olivo, and E. Harris for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Israel Nur and Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. for their generous gift of purified human gamma globulin.

The work was supported by grants from the Edward Mallinckrodt Jr. Foundation and a New Scholar Award in Global Infectious Diseases from the Ellison Foundation.


   FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Ave., Box 8051, St. Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 362-2842. Fax: (314) 362-9230. E-mail: diamond{at}borcim.wustl.edu. Back


   REFERENCES
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and METHODS
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Agrawal, A. G., and L. R. Petersen. 2003. Human immunoglobulin as a treatment for West Nile virus infection.J. Infect. Dis. 188:1-4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Albrecht, P. 1968. Pathogenesis of neurotropic arbovirus infections. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 43:44-91.[Medline]
  3. Ammons, W. S., R. J. Bauer, A. H. Horwitz, Z. J. Chen, E. Bautista, H. H. Ruan, M. Abramova, K. R. Scott, and R. L. Dedrick.2003 . In vitro and in vivo pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of a human engineered monoclonal antibody to epithelial cell adhesion molecule. Neoplasia 5:146-154.[Medline]
  4. Anderson, J. F., and J. J. Rahal. 2002. Efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin against West Nile virus in vitro. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:107-108.[Medline]
  5. Asnis, D. S., R. Conetta, A. A. Teixeira, G. Waldman, and B. A. Sampson. 2000. The West Nile Virus outbreak of 1999 in New York: the Flushing Hospital experience.Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:413-418.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Barrett, A. D., and E. A. Gould. 1986. Antibody-mediated early death in vivo after infection with yellow fever virus. J. Gen. Virol. 67:2539-2542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ben-Nathan, D., S. Lustig, G. Tam, S. Robinzon, S. Segal, and B. Rager-Zisman.2003 . Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of human intravenous immunoglobulin in treating west nile virus infection in mice. J. Infect. Dis. 188:5-12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Brandriss, M. W., J. J. Schlesinger, E. E. Walsh, and M. Briselli. 1986. Lethal 17D yellow fever encephalitis in mice. I. Passive protection by monoclonal antibodies to the envelope proteins of 17D yellow fever and dengue 2 viruses.J. Gen. Virol. 67:229-234.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Broom, A. K., M. J. Wallace, J. S. Mackenzie, D. W. Smith, and R. A. Hall. 2000. Immunisation with gamma globulin to Murray Valley encephalitis virus and with an inactivated Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine as prophylaxis against Australian encephalitis: evaluation in a mouse model. J. Med. Virol. 61:259-265.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Cardosa, M. J., S. Gordon, S. Hirsch, T. A. Springer, and J. S. Porterfield. 1986. Interaction of West Nile virus with primary murine macrophages: role of cell activation and receptors for antibody and complement. J. Virol. 57:952-959.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cardosa, M. J., J. S. Porterfield, and S. Gordon.1983 . Complement receptor mediates enhanced flavivirus replication in macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 158:258-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Chiba, N., M. Osada, K. Komoro, T. Mizutani, H. Kariwa, and I. Takashima.1999 . Protection against tick-borne encephalitis virus isolated in Japan by active and passive immunization.Vaccine 17:1532-1539.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Colombage, G., R. Hall, M. Pavy, and M. Lobigs. 1998. DNA-based and alphavirus-vectored immunisation with prM and E proteins elicits long-lived and protective immunity against the flavivirus, Murray Valley encephalitis virus. Virology 250:151-163.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Despres, P., J. Dietrich, M. Girard, and M. Bouloy. 1991. Recombinant baculoviruses expressing yellow fever virus E and NS1 proteins elicit protective immunity in mice. J. Gen. Virol. 72:2811-2816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Diamond, M., T. Roberts, D. Edgil, B. Lu, J. Ernst, and E. Harris.2000 . Modulation of dengue virus infection in human cells by alpha, beta, and gamma interferons. J. Virol. 74:4957-4966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Diamond, M. S., D. Edgil, T. G. Roberts, B. Lu, and E. Harris. 2000. Infection of human cells by dengue virus is modulated by different cell types and viral strains.J. Virol. 74:7814-7823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Diamond, M. S., B. Shrestha, A. Marri, D. Mahan, and M. Engle.2003 . B cells and antibody play critical roles in the immediate defense of disseminated infection by West Nile encephalitis virus. J. Virol. 77:2578-2586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ebel, G. D., A. P. Dupuis III, K. Ngo, D. Nicholas, E. Kauffman, S. A. Jones, D. Young, J. Maffei, P. Y. Shi, K. Bernard, and L. Kramer. 2001. Partial genetic characterization of West Nile Virus strains, New York State, 2000.Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:650-653.[Medline]
  19. Falconar, A. K. 1999. Identification of an epitope on the dengue virus membrane (M) protein defined by cross-protective monoclonal antibodies: design of an improved epitope sequence based on common determinants present in both envelope (E and M) proteins.Arch. Virol. 144:2313-2330.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Falgout, B., M. Bray, J. J. Schlesinger, and C. J. Lai.1990 . Immunization of mice with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing authentic dengue virus nonstructural protein NS1 protects against lethal dengue virus encephalitis. J. Virol. 64:4356-4363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gollins, S., and J. Porterfield. 1984. Flavivirus infection enhancement in macrophages: radioactive and biological studies on the effect of antibody and viral fate. J. Gen. Virol. 65:1261-1272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gollins, S. W., and J. S. Porterfield.1985 . Flavivirus infection enhancement in macrophages: an electron microscopic study of viral entry. J. Gen. Virol. 66:1969-1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Gould, E. A., A. Buckley, B. K. Groeger, P. A. Cane, and M. Doenhoff. 1987. Immune enhancement of yellow fever virus neurovirulence for mice: studies of mechanisms involved. J. Gen. Virol. 68:3105-3112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gould, E. A., and A. Buckley. 1989. Antibody-dependent enhancement of yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis virus neurovirulence. J. Gen. Virol. 70:1605-1608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Griffin, D., B. Levine, W. Tyor, S. Ubol, and P. Despres. 1997. The role of antibody in recovery from alphavirus encephalitis.Immunol. Rev. 159:155-161.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Griffin, D. E., S. Ubol, P. Despres, T. Kimura, and A. Byrnes.2001 . Role of antibodies in controlling alphavirus infection of neurons. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 260:191-200.[Medline]
  27. Halstead, S. B. 1989. Antibody, macrophages, dengue virus infection, shock, and hemorrhage: a pathogenetic cascade.Rev. Infect. Dis. 11(Suppl. 4):S830-S839.
  28. Halstead, S. B., J. S. Porterfield, and E. J. O'Rourke. 1980. Enhancement of dengue virus infection in monocytes by flavivirus antisera. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 29:638-642.
  29. Halstead, S. B., C. N. Venkateshan, M. K. Gentry, and L. K. Larsen. 1984. Heterogeneity of infection enhancement of dengue 2 strains by monoclonal antibodies.J. Immunol. 132:1529-1532.[Abstract]
  30. Hamdan, A., P. Green, E. Mendelson, M. R. Kramer, S. Pitlik, and M. Weinberger. 2002. Possible benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in a lung transplant recipient with West Nile virus encephalitis. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 4:160-162.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Henchal, E. A., L. S. Henchal, and J. J. Schlesinger. 1988. Synergistic interactions of anti-NS1 monoclonal antibodies protect passively immunized mice from lethal challenge with dengue 2 virus. J. Gen. Virol. 69:2101-2107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hubalek, Z., and J. Halouzka. 1999. West Nile fever -a reemerging mosquito-borne viral disease in Europe. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:643-650.[Medline]
  33. Jordan, I., T. Briese, N. Fischer, J. Y. Lau, and W. I. Lipkin. 2000. Ribavirin inhibits west nile virus replication and cytopathic effect in neural cells. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1214-1217.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Kimura-Kuroda, J., and K. Yasui. 1988. Protection of mice against Japanese encephalitis virus by passive administration with monoclonal antibodies. J. Immunol. 141:3606-3610.[Abstract]
  35. Kreil, T. R., and M. M. Eibl. 1997. Pre- and postexposure protection by passive immunoglobulin but no enhancement of infection with a flavivirus in a mouse model.J. Virol. 71:2921-2927.[Abstract]
  36. Kurane, I., and F. E. Ennis. 1992. Immunity and immunopathology in dengue virus infections. Semin. Immunol. 4:121-127.[Medline]
  37. Levine, B., and D. E. Griffin. 1992. Persistence of viral RNA in mouse brains after recovery from acute alphavirus encephalitis. J. Virol. 66:6429-6435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Levine, B., J. M. Hardwick, and D. E. Griffin.1994 . Persistence of alphaviruses in vertebrate hosts.Trends Microbiol. 2:25-28.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Levine, B., J. M. Hardwick, B. D. Trapp, T. O. Crawford, R. C. Bollinger, and D. E. Griffin.1991 . Antibody-mediated clearance of alphavirus infection from neurons. Science 254:856-860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Mathews, J. H., and J. T. Roehrig. 1984. Elucidation of the topography and determination of the protective epitopes on the E glycoprotein of Saint Louis encephalitis virus by passive transfer with monoclonal antibodies. J. Immunol. 132:1533-1537.[Abstract]
  41. Morens, D. M. 1994. Antibody-dependent of enhancement of infection and the pathogenesis of viral disease.Clin. Infect. Dis. 19:500-512.[Medline]
  42. Nir, Y., A. Beemer, and R. A. Goldwasser. 1965. West Nile Virus infection in mice following exposure to a viral aerosol. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 46:443-449.[Medline]
  43. Ogawa, M., H. Okubo, Y. Tsuji, N. Yasui, and K. Someda. 1973. Chronic progressive encephalitis occurring 13 years after Russian spring-summer encephalitis. J. Neurol. Sci. 19:363-373.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Peiris, J. S., and J. S. Porterfield.1979 . Antibody-mediated enhancement of Flavivirus replication in macrophage-like cell lines. Nature 282:509-511.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Peiris, J. S. M., S. Gordon, J. C. Unkeless, and J. S. Porterfield. 1981. Monoclonal anti-Fc receptor IgG blocks antibody-dependent enhancement of viral replication in macrophages. Nature 289:189-191.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Peiris, J. S. M., J. S. Porterfield, and J. T. Roehrig. 1982. Monoclonal antibodies against the flavivirus West Nile. J. Gen. Virol. 58:283-289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Phillpotts, R. J., J. R. Stephenson, and J. S. Porterfield. 1987. Passive immunization of mice with monoclonal antibodies raised against tick-borne encephalitis virus.Brief report. Arch. Virol. 93:295-301.
  48. Pincus, S., P. W. Mason, E. Konishi, B. A. Fonseca, R. E. Shope, C. M. Rice, and E. Paoletti.1992 . Recombinant vaccinia virus producing the prM and E proteins of yellow fever virus protects mice from lethal yellow fever encephalitis. Virology 187:290-297.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Pogodina, V. V., M. P. Frolova, G. V. Malenko, G. I. Fokina, G. V. Koreshkova, L. L. Kiseleva, N. G. Bochkova, and N. M. Ralph.1983 . Study on West Nile virus persistence in monkeys.Arch. Virol. 75:71-86.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Putnak, J. R., and J. J. Schlesinger.1990 . Protection of mice against yellow fever virus encephalitis by immunization with a vaccinia virus recombinant encoding the yellow fever virus nonstructural proteins, NS1, NS2a and NS2b.J. Gen. Virol. 71:1697-1702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Roehrig, J. T., J. H. Mathews, and D. W. Trent. 1983. Identification of epitopes on the E glycoprotein of Saint Louis encephalitis virus with monoclonal antibodies. Virology 128:118-126.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Roehrig, J. T., L. A. Staudinger, A. R. Hunt, J. H. Mathews, and C. D. Blair.2001 . Antibody prophylaxis and therapy for flaviviral encephalitis infections. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 951:286-297.
  53. Sawyer, L. A. 2000. Antibodies for the prevention and treatment of viral diseases. Antivir. Res. 47:57-77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Schlesinger, J. J., M. W. Brandriss, C. B. Cropp, and T. P. Monath. 1986. Protection against yellow fever in monkeys by immunization with yellow fever virus nonstructural protein NS1. J. Virol. 60:1153-1155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Schlesinger, J. J., M. W. Brandriss, J. R. Putnak, and E. E. Walsh. 1990. Cell surface expression of yellow fever virus nonstructural glycoprotein NS1: consequences of interaction with antibody. J. Gen. Virol. 71:593-599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Schlesinger, J. J., M. W. Brandriss, and E. E. Walsh. 1985. Protection against 17D yellow fever encephalitis in mice by passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies to the nonstructural glycoprotein gp48 and by active immunization with gp48. J. Immunol. 135:2805-2809.[Abstract]
  57. Schlesinger, J. J., M. W. Brandriss, and E. E. Walsh. 1987. Protection of mice against dengue 2 virus encephalitis by immunization with the dengue 2 virus nonstructural glycoprotein NS1. J. Gen. Virol. 68:853-857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Schlesinger, J. J., and S. Chapman. 1995. Neutralizing F(ab')2 fragments of protective monoclonal antibodies to yellow fever virus (YF) envelope protein fail to protect mice against lethal YF encephalitis. J. Gen. Virol. 76:217-220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Schlesinger, J. J., M. Foltzer, and S. Chapman. 1993. The Fc portion of antibody to yellow fever virus NS1 is a determinant of protection against YF encephalitis in mice. Virology 192:132-141.[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Sharma, S., A. Mathur, V. Prakash, R. Kulshreshtha, R. Kumar, and U. C. Chaturvedi. 1991. Japanese encephalitis virus latency in peripheral blood lymphocytes and recurrence of infection in children. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 85:85-89.[Medline]
  61. Shimoni, Z., M. J. Niven, S. Pitlick, and S. Bulvik.2001 . Treatment of West Nile virus encephalitis with intravenous immunoglobulin. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:759.[Medline]
  62. Tardei, G., S. Ruta, V. Chitu, C. Rossi, T. F. Tsai, and C. Cernescu. 2000. Evaluation of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG enzyme immunoassays in serologic diagnosis of West Nile virus infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:2232-2239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Tsai, T. F., F. Popovici, C. Cernescu, G. L. Campbell, and N. I. Nedelcu. 1998. West Nile encephalitis epidemic in southeastern Romania. Lancet 352:767-771.[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Vazquez, S., M. G. Guzman, G. Guillen, G. Chinea, A. B. Perez, M. Pupo, R. Rodriguez, O. Reyes, H. E. Garay, I. Delgado, G. Garcia, and M. Alvarez. 2002. Immune response to synthetic peptides of dengue prM protein.Vaccine 20:1823-1830.[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Webb, H. E., D. G. Wight, G. S. Platt, and C. E. G. Smith. 1968. Langat virus encephalitis in mice. I. The effect of the administration of specific antiserum. J. Hyg. 66:343-354.
  66. Xiao, S. Y., H. Guzman, H. Zhang, A. P. Travassos da Rosa, and R. B. Tesh. 2001. West Nile virus infection in the golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus): a model for West Nile encephalitis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:714-721.[Medline]
  67. Zeitlin, L., R. A. Cone, and K. J. Whaley.1999 . Using monoclonal antibodies to prevent mucosal transmission of epidemic infectious diseases. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5:54-64.[Medline]

Journal of Virology, December 2003, p. 12941-12949, Vol. 77, No. 24
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.24.12941-12949.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engle, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Engle, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diamond, M. S.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS