Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, November 2003, p. 12373-12377, Vol. 77, No. 22
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.22.12373-12377.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center and the Rockefeller University, New York, New York
Received 9 May 2003/ Accepted 7 August 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have previously described constructs and assays that demonstrated that artificial tethering of Tsg101 to sites of HIV-1 particle assembly, by fusion to Gag, reverses the HIV-1 budding defect that results from mutational inactivation of the PTAP L-domain (17, 18). This type of assay is represented schematically in Fig. 1A and employs a Gag precursor protein lacking the p6 domain (Gag
p6) that encodes a synthetic linker at its C terminus. Candidate L-domains or Tsg101 is fused to this truncated Gag protein and is expressed with an L-domain-defective proviral plasmid. Because HIV-1 Gag efficiently multimerizes at the plasma membrane (16, 25), expression of a Gag
p6 protein that is fused to functional L-domain or is directly fused to Tsg101 can functionally complement a PTAP-defective proviral construct, resulting in infectious virion production (17, 18). A result from this type of assay is shown in Fig. 1B. For this experiment, 5 x 104 HOS cells seeded in 24-well plates were cotransfected with 300 ng of a PTAP-defective HIV-1 proviral construct (pNL[LTAL]) (17) and 200 ng of a pGag
p6-Tsg101 expression plasmid by using Lipofectamine Plus, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Infectious virus production was measured by inoculating P4-R5 cells, with clarified supernatant from the transfected HOS cells. ß-Galactosidase expression resulting from activation of the integrated HIV-1 long terminal repeat-lacZ indicator gene in P4-R5 cells was measured 48 h later, as previously described (3, 17). As can be seen in Fig. 1B, coexpression of Gag
p6-Tsg101 resulted in an enhancement of NL(LTAL) infectious virion production by 10- to 15-fold. Conversely, in an almost identical experiment also shown in Fig. 1B, but in which the HIV-1 provirus was rendered defective by the introduction of a translational termination codon in place of the N-terminal p6 codon (NL
p6), the Gag
p6-Tsg101 fusion protein was, surprisingly, unable to restore infectious virion production.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Tsg101 recruitment is not sufficient to account for the L-domain activity exhibited by HIV-1 p6. (A) The complementation assay. A schematic representation of the complementing Gag p6 protein is shown. It contains MA, CA, and NC domains and the N-terminal 4 residues of p6 (LQSR) to permit cleavage by the HIV-1 protease. The synthetic linker sequence (LEFGGRLE) also encodes EcoRI, NotI, and XhoI restriction sites (underlined) for reinsertion of full-length or truncated versions of p6, the PTAP sequence, or Tsg101. For the assay itself, Gag-Pol and mutant Gag proteins are expressed by the defective proviral construct and are depicted in black; the complementing fusion protein, in this case Gag p6-Tsg101, is shown in white. Tsg101 is recruited to sites of virion production by virtue of Gag multimerization. (B) Infectious virus production by defective provirus (NL[LTAL], black bars; or NL p6, white bars) complemented by Gag p6-Tsg101. The chart shows ß-galactosidase activity in HeLa P4/R5 cells following inoculation with supernatant harvested from HOS cells transfected with defective provirus constructs and the indicated complementing expression plasmid. RLU, relative light units. (C) Same information as that given for panel B applies, except that only the pNL p6 proviral plasmid was used, complemented with either pGag p6-p6 or pGag p6-Tsg101, as indicated. (D) Western blot analysis, with an anti-CA monoclonal antibody, of cell lysates and virion pellets following transfection of HOS cells with the pNL p6 provirus plus either pGag p6 (lane 1), pGag p6-p6 (lane 2), or pGag p6-Tsg101 (lane 3).
|
p6-Tsg101 to complement NL
p6 was not due to any cis-acting defect in the NL
p6 provirus. Indeed, this defective virus was efficiently complemented in trans by coexpression of a Gag
p6-p6 fusion protein. Moreover, as shown in Fig. 1D, the overall particle release and cell-associated Gag processing defect exhibited by NL
p6, which are characteristic of L-domain defective HIV-1 constructs, were reversed by coexpression of Gag
p6-p6 but not by coexpression of Gag
p6-Tsg101. In contrast, we have previously shown that similar defects induced by point mutations in the PTAP motif could be reversed by Gag
p6-Tsg101 coexpression (17, 18). Thus, these results indicate that recruitment of Tsg101 is sufficient to account for the activity exhibited by the HIV-1 PTAP motif but does not account for the entire effect on virion morphogenesis that is exerted by HIV-1 p6.
To test whether p6 sequences outside the PTAP motif could exhibit L-domain activity, either alone or in conjunction with PTAP, we again used a complementation approach. This strategy, shown schematically in Fig. 2A, was elaborated to include two complementing Gag
p6-fusion proteins, coexpressed with the defective pNL
p6 proviral construct. First, we compared the ability of a 10-residue HIV-1 p6-derived peptide containing the PTAP motif (P5EPTAPPEES14) versus the entire p6 domain to function in trans in the context of a Gag
p6-fusion protein to restore infectious virion production by NL
p6. For these experiments, 5 x 104 293T cells seeded in 24-well plates were cotransfected with 300 ng of NL
p6 along with 100 ng of pGag
p6 and 100 ng of either pGag
p6-p6, pGag
p6-PTAP, or pGag
p6-p6 (15-51) expression plasmids by using Lipofectamine Plus. Analysis of infectious virion production revealed that the intact p6 domain functioned substantially more efficiently than did the PTAP-containing peptide sequence. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 2B, expression of Gag
p6-p6 increased infectious virion production by NL
p6 approximately 270-fold. In contrast, Gag
p6-PTAP was less than 10% as active as Gag
p6-p6 and enhanced infectious virion formation by only 24-fold.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. The PTAP motif and additional p6 sequences can act synergistically and in trans to mediate infectious HIV-1 virion production. (A) Schematic representation of the complementation assay. Gag-Pol and Gag p6 proteins expressed by the defective proviral construct (NL p6) are depicted in black; the complementing fusion proteins, in this case Gag p6-PTAP and Gag p6-p6 (15-51), are shown in white. (B) Infectious virion production measured as for Fig. 1 by using HeLa P4/R5 cells. Forty-eight hours of transfection of 293T cells with 300 ng of NL p6 was carried out, and the indicated quantities (in nanograms) of pGag p6, pGag p6-p6, pGag p6-PTAP and/or pGag p6-p6 (15-51) are indicated. RLU, relative light units. (C and D) The same information as that given for panel A applies, except that HOS (C) or TE671 (D) was transfected.
|
p6-p6 (15-51), which contains all p6 sequences C terminal to the PTAP-containing peptide described above, was inactive and did not detectably increase virion formation when coexpressed with NL
p6 (Fig. 2B). Notably, however, when used in combination, Gag
p6-PTAP and Gag
p6-p6 (15-51) complemented NL
p6 efficiently and supported infectious virion formation almost as efficiently as the intact Gag
p6-p6 protein (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that the PTAP motif and p6 residues 15 to 51 can complement each other in trans to mediate the formation of infectious HIV-1 particles. This strongly suggests that p6 residues outside the PTAP motif do not accentuate HIV-1 budding by modulating PTAP structure but instead contribute an additional activity that synergizes with PTAP to induce HIV-1 virion morphogenesis. To confirm that the activity ascribed to p6 residues 15 to 51 was not simply a cell line-specific phenomenon, we performed experiments essentially identical to those depicted in Fig. 2A but used additional HIV-1-permissive cell lines. As is shown in Fig. 2B and C, a similar trans-complementing phenotype between PTAP and p6 (15-51) was observed in both HOS and TE671 cells. Similar results were also obtained with HeLa cells (data not shown).
We further examined Gag processing and particle production phenotypes in 293T cells by using the same complementation assay in conjunction with Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 3, cells expressing NL
p6 and Gag
p6 released undetectable levels of viral particles and analysis of cell-associated Gag revealed a profound processing defect with little mature p24 being present. A substantial reversion of this defect was observed when Gag
p6-p6 was coexpressed. Although significant levels of partly processed p25 (CA-p2) were observed in these cell lysates, this is likely due to a suboptimal level of p6 and Pol expressed in these cells: because this elaboration of the trans-complementation assay requires cotransfection with three expression plasmids, only approximately one-fifth of the total Gag expressed encodes p6 and about three-fifths of the normal level of Pol is expressed. Nonetheless, this analysis clearly demonstrates the ability of Gag
p6-p6 to enhance NL
p6Gag processing and particle release. Gag
p6-PTAP had marginal effects on Gag processing but did support particle release. However, while the total level of Gag
p6-PTAP-induced particle release was only slightly reduced (<2-fold) compared to that induced by Gag
p6-p6, approximately one-third of the particle-associated capsid protein was in an immature, p25CA-p2 form. This latter finding probably explains why Gag
p6-PTAP-complemented virions appear significantly less infectious than do Gag
p6-p6-complemented counterparts (Fig. 2A). The Gag
p6-p6 (15-51) fusion protein appeared inactive when present as the sole complementing construct; however, its expression clearly enhanced the ability of Gag
p6-PTAP to mediate fully processed virion formation. Indeed, the combination of Gag
p6-PTAP and Gag
p6-p6 (15-51) was as active as the intact Gag
p6-p6 protein (Fig. 3). Thus, these results are similar to those obtained by use of the infectivity assay of virion production (Fig. 2A) and confirm that the PTAP motif and p6 residues 15 to 51 act synergistically and in trans to mediate the formation of mature HIV-1 virions. A further Western analysis of cell lysates and virion pellets derived from similarly transfected HOS cells revealed results essentially identical to those obtained with 293T cells (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Western blot analysis of the effect of PTAP and p6 (15-51) on Gag processing and particle release. 293T cells were transfected with 300 ng of pNL p6 and the indicated complementing pGag p6-fusion protein expression plasmids, as was done for Fig. 2. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cell lysates and pelleted extracellular virions (harvested by ultracentrifugation through a 20% sucrose cushion) were analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-p24CA monoclonal antibody. The number(s) below each lane indicates the levels of mature p24 CA protein and the incompletely processed p25 CA-p2 intermediate in virion pellets, quantitated by analysis of the blots with NIH Image. ND, not detectable.
|
p6 virions complemented in trans by coexpression of either Gag
p6-PTAP or Gag
p6-p6. These experiments, shown in Fig. 4, revealed that pNL
p6-transfected cells synthesized immature virions that largely remained tethered to each other and to cells (Fig. 4A). This phenotype was expected but was somewhat more dramatic than has been previously reported for PTAP point mutants. Conversely, NL
p6 complemented with Gag
p6-p6 did not exhibit this dramatic L-domain-defective phenotype. Budding structures as well as immature, and occasionally mature, extracellular virions were observed (Fig. 4B). Complementation with Gag
p6-PTAP resulted in an apparently intermediate phenotype: while the late-budding defect appeared somewhat less severe than in the absence of a complementing Gag
p6-fusion protein, immature cell-associated virions were observed and mature extracellular virions were only very rarely observed (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that the L-domain activity exhibited by the PTAP motif is accentuated by the presence of additional p6 sequences.
![]() View larger version (90K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Electron microscopy analysis of p6- and PTAP-mediated virion budding. 293T cells were transfected with pNL p6 and pGag p6 (A), pNL p6 and pGag p6-p6 (B), or pNL p6 and pGag p6-PTAP (C), in each case in a 3:2 molar ratio. Cells were harvested and processed for microscopy 48 h after transfection. Each panel shows an overview of part of a transfected cell (left) as well as a higher magnification of budding structures and virions (right).
|
p6-Tsg101 does not complement NL
p6, it is also unlikely that p6 (15-51) acts by facilitating Tsg101 recruitment. This effectively excludes the possibility that p6 ubiqutination and consequent enhancement of Tsg101 binding (8) are the underlying mechanism by which p6 (12-51) enhances HIV-1 particle formation. Indeed, it has been previously shown that lysine residues in p6 are completely dispensable for HIV-1 budding and replication (19). While it is possible that ubiquitination at alternative HIV-1 Gag sites might facilitate Tsg101 recruitment (8, 23), the presence of this proven L-domain cofactor at sites of particle assembly appears insufficient to account for the virion morphogenesis activity exhibited by HIV-1 p6. One possibility, currently under investigation, is that p6 (12-51) acts by recruiting distinct cellular cofactors, perhaps additional ESCRT components or other class E VPS factors that are known to mediate the budding of vesicles within cells (1, 2, 15, 22).
This work was supported by grants from the NIH (RO1 AI52774) and AmFAR (02865-31). J.M.-S. is the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte (Spain). P.D.B. is an Elizabeth Glaser Scientist of the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»