Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, November 2003, p. 11973-11984, Vol. 77, No. 22
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.22.11973-11984.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Center for Retrovirus Research,1 Departments of Veterinary Biosciences,4 Molecular Virology, Immunology & Medical Genetics,2 Molecular, Cellular & Developmental Biology Graduate Program,3 Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-10935
Received 23 June 2003/ Accepted 20 August 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Extensive mutagenesis studies of CTE and DR have mapped necessary and redundant structural motifs that present unpaired nucleotides for interaction with cellular posttranscriptional modulators. The MPMV and SRV-1 CTEs share 92% sequence homology and are 154-nucleotide (nt) orientation- and position-dependent RNA elements (27, 32). The RNA structure of the CTE that is predicted by M-Fold software (20, 35) is a stable stem-loop structure (
G = -39.4 kcal/mol) that consists of a degenerate repeat of
70 nt, a 9-nt terminal loop, and two 16-nt internal loops that are rotated 180° relative to each other (11, 32). The M-Fold prediction was validated by RNA structure analysis and extensive mutagenesis and functional analysis by a Gag reporter gene assay (11, 32). Point mutations designed to disrupt the double-stranded stem regions adjacent to the loops eliminated HIV-1 gag reporter gene activity (11). Compensatory mutations to restore base pairing of the stem rescued Gag production, confirming that the double-stranded stem structure is essential for activity. The stem has been postulated to orient the single-stranded loop nucleotides into the functionally correct position. Mutagenesis experiments by Tabernero et al. (32) indicated that the sequence of the internal loops, an AAGA bulge, and the stem structure between the loops are essential for CTE activity. Collectively, the mutagenesis data indicate that the secondary structure of CTE RNA and primary sequence of the unpaired nucleotides in the internal loops are necessary for CTE activity.
The DR is a 135-nt redundant stem-loop structure that also functions in an orientation-dependent manner (33). Each DR consists of two subelements referred to as DR1 and DR2 (29). Introduction of substitution mutations into predicted internal and terminal loop sequences in DR1 of the replication-competent Prague Rous sarcoma virus C reduces replication by a factor of 10 to 20 and reduces genomic RNA packaging by a factor of 10 (1). Two separate point mutations at the predicted stem-loop junction of one of the internal loops of the DR reduced expression of unspliced cat transcripts to between 10 and 40% of wild-type expression (24). Similar to the mutational analyses of CTE, these mutagenesis results demonstrated the functional importance of predicted unpaired nucleotides in the internal loops of DR. The role of the predicted double-stranded stem in DR remains to be verified, but it is projected to correctly position the unpaired nucleotides for interaction with functionally relevant cellular proteins.
The posttranscriptional control element in the 5' SNV LTR was initially identified by its ability to facilitate Rex/Rex-responsive element-independent expression of bovine leukemia virus RNA (2). Subsequently, the SNV LTR was determined to facilitate Rev/RRE-independent expression of unspliced HIV-1 gag reporter RNA (6). Rev/RRE-independent Gag expression is eliminated when the RU5 region of the LTR is positioned in the antisense orientation or the LTR is repositioned to the 3' UTR (6, 8). SNV RU5 does not function by derepressing inhibitory sequences located in the HIV-1 gag gene (28). Ribosomal sedimentation and ribosome profile analysis established that SNV RU5 augments polysome loading onto HIV-1 gag reporter RNA and also nonviral luciferase (luc) reporter RNA (6, 28). Experiments with bicistronic luc reporter plasmids determined that SNV RU5 does not function as an internal ribosome entry sequence (28). Together these results indicate that the RU5 region of the SNV LTR functions as a unique, orientation-dependent RNA element that enhances translation. Sequence or structural motifs necessary for activity remain to be defined.
Here, results of RNA and protein assays on SNV RU5 deletion and substitution mutants and enzymatic mapping of SNV RU5 RNA identified sequence and structural motifs necessary for activity. The experiments determined that SNV RU5 contains two functionally redundant stem-loops that are necessary for Rev/RRE-independent Gag production. Our genetic and biochemical results indicate that SNV RU5 stem-loop structures present unpaired nucleotides for functional interaction with a cellular posttranscriptional modulator(s). Quantitative RNA analysis by RNase protection assay (RPA) indicates that the mutations do not diminish the steady-state level or cytoplasmic accumulation of gag RNA. Instead, the mutations preclude efficient translational utilization of the cytoplasmic transcripts.
|
|
|---|
A), 46 to 115 (
B), and 115 to 165 (
C) or combinations of these (
AB,
BC, and
AC). The PCR template for mutagenesis was pYW100 (6) with the following exceptions.
AB was generated from PCR template
B.
AC was generated from PCR template
A. AA' was created from PCR template A. CC' was created from PCR template C. AC' was created from PCR template A. AA'CC' was created from PCR template AA'C'. ACtif was created from PCR template Atif. Aloop
BC was created from PCR template
BC. Aall
BC was created from PCR template
BC. Antisense CBA was created by digesting pYW207 (6) with BamHI and ApaI to excise the antisense CBA region, which was inserted into pYW205 (6) that had been digested with BamHI and ApaI. The intermediate plasmid pTR170 was generated by site-directed mutagenesis of pYW100 to create a ClaI site between regions B and C of RU5. Subsequently, mutant ABA was created by digestion of pTR170 with ClaI and BamHI to excise the C region and ligation with complementary linkers that contain the A region. SNV RU5 spacer mutants pTR162, pTR163, pTR143, and pTR200 contain the indicated inserts that were ligated at a unique AvaI site at position 2. pTR162 was created by introduction of a 35-bp synthetic linker with AvaI termini into the AvaI site in pYW100. pTR163 was created by insertion of a 35-bp synthetic linker with XhoI and SalI termini into an XhoI site within the linker in pTR162. pTR143 was created by introduction of 100 bp of pUC19 (coordinates 896 to 1,000 [New England Biolabs]) with AvaI termini into the AvaI site of pYW100. pTR200 was created by introduction of 194 bp of pGFP-N1 (coordinates 944 to 1139 [Clontech]) with AvaI termini into the AvaI site of pYW100. All mutant plasmids were verified by extensive restriction digestion and sequence analysis and lack an AUG translation initiation codon.
DNA transfection and reporter protein analysis. Reporter gene assays were performed on 293 cells transfected by a CaCl2 protocol (6) in three replicate 100- or 33-mm-diameter plates. The cells were harvested 48 h posttransfection in phosphate-buffered saline, centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 3 min, and resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40). Gag levels were quantified by a Gag enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Coulter Corp.) and normalized to Luc activity (relative light units) measured with a Lumicount luminometer (Packard); Luc was expressed from cotransfected pGL3 (Promega).
RNA preparation and analysis.
For preparation of nuclear and cytoplasmic RNAs, cells were harvested 48 h posttransfection and resuspended in 400 µl of hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol). The cell suspensions were chilled on ice for 10 min and vortexed for 10 s, and nuclei were sedimented by centrifugation at 350 x g for 1 min at 4°C. Isolation of nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA from the pellet and supernatant, respectively, was performed with TriReagent by using the manufacturer's protocol (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio). The RNA was treated twice with DNase for 30 min at 37°C, phenol extracted, and ethanol precipitated. For RPAs, 25 µg of total RNA, 15 µg of nuclear RNA, or 25 µg of cytoplasmic RNA was analyzed as previously described (6). Antisense runoff
-32P-labeled RNA transcripts were synthesized with MAXIscript T7 polymerase (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. HIV-1 template pGEM (140 to 440) was digested with NotI, and pGAPDH was digested with NcoI. The HIV probe is 344 nt in length and complementary to the HIV 5' UTR and the 5' 106 nt of the gag open reading frame (6). Expected sizes of protected fragments are 303 nt for the unspliced product and 146 nt for spliced gag RNA. Spacer mutant T7 templates were generated as PCR products by using primers that amplify a region including 66 nt of the U3 promoter through the first 144 nt of the HIV 5' UTR. The in vitro-transcribed RNAs were isolated by gel elution, and the RPAs were performed with RPAIII (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA was ethanol precipitated with 3 x 105 cpm of HIV-1 gag probe and 1 x 104 cpm of a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene probe. RPA products were separated on acrylamide gels and were visualized by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) analysis, and RNA signals were quantified by ImageQuant version 4.2 software (Molecular Dynamics).
RNA secondary structure mapping.
MAXIscript T7 polymerase (Ambion) was used to transcribe the SNV RNAs from PCR products that contain the T7 promoter. The RNAs were dephosphorylated and 5' end labeled with [
-32P]ATP, and the full-length transcript was purified from a denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Target RNA was used at 250 ng per mapping reaction. For alkaline hydrolysis reactions, the target RNA was incubated in alkaline hydrolysis buffer (50 mM sodium carbonate [pH 9.2], 1 mM EDTA) with 3 µg of tRNA at 95°C for 5 min. For RNase T1 sequencing, target RNA was incubated in RNA sequencing buffer (20 mM sodium citrate [pH 5], 1 mM EDTA, 7 M urea) with 1 µg of tRNA at 50°C for 15 min, cooled to room temperature, and incubated with RNase T1 (Ambion) for 15 min at room temperature. For RNase T1 structure mapping, target RNA was incubated in RNA structure buffer (100 mM Tris [pH 7], 1 M KCl, 100 mM MgCl2) with 1 µg of tRNA and RNase T1 for 15 min at room temperature. For RNase A structure mapping, target RNA was incubated in RNA structure buffer with 1 µg of tRNA and RNase A (Ambion) for 15 min at room temperature. For RNase V1 structure mapping, target RNA was incubated in structure buffer with 1 µg of RNA and RNase V1 (Ambion) for 15 min at room temperature. All reactions were terminated by ethanol precipitation. Digested products were separated on 10 or 20% denaturing acrylamide gels and visualized with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
|
|
|---|
A,
B, or
C) and combined deletion of A and B (
AB) or B and C (
BC) reduced but did not eliminate Gag production. By contrast, combined deletion of A and C (
AC) eliminated Gag production. Because the presence of either A or C is sufficient for partial activity, we sought to determine whether two A regions act in a functionally redundant manner to restore Gag production to near-wild-type levels. To test this, we created a mutant that contains two copies of A (ABA). We postulated that introduction of two copies of A would either restore activity or produce altered base pairing that sterically hinders efficient translation. The results were consistent with the second possibility and showed that two copies of A do not act in a redundant manner to restore SNV RU5 activity.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Reporter plasmid and RPA analysis. (A) Representation of parental SNV/HIV-1 reporter plasmid pYW100 showing the relative positions of mutated A, B, and C regions and the location of spacer insertions, the RPA probe, and protected RNA species. White rectangles, SNV LTR; horizontal dotted line, position of inserted spacer sequences; black line, HIV-1 5' UTR; black rectangle, HIV-1 gag-pol genes; circle, polyadenylation signal. Splice sites are indicated by an asterisk. (B) List of plasmids that lack or contain spacer insertions, with the length of the inserted sequence, the length of the RPA probe, and the predicted size of protected RNA band after RNase digestion. (C) Representative RPA of spacer mutant RNA. HIV-1 Gag reporter plasmids were transfected into 293 cells. At 48 h posttransfection, total RNA was isolated and treated with DNase, and 20 µg of RNA was subjected to RPA with the indicated probe and GAPDH RNA probe. Transcripts were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and RNA signals were quantified by phosphorimager analysis. Undigested GAPDH RNA probe is labeled in italics, lanes are labeled with the designated reporter RNA. An RNA sample from pTR143 was electrophoresed separately to facilitate better resolution and the GAPDH RNA probe was omitted due to overlapping sizes of the GAPDH RNA protected band and the pTR143 probe. The position of protected GAPDH RNA is indicated on the right. , position of spacer probes; , position of protected RNA.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Effect of SNV RU5 deletion mutations on Gag production
|
Location at the 5' terminus is not essential for SNV RU5 activity. Retroviral LTRs are composed of three regions: U3, R, and U5. U3 contains the viral promoter, and the first base pair of R corresponds to the RNA start site. Previous results determined that repositioning SNV RU5 distal to the RNA start site eliminates Rev/RRE-independent Gag production and stimulation of luciferase production (6, 28). Here we sought to assess the requirement of the 5'-proximal position of SNV RU5 for Rev/RRE-independent HIV-1 Gag production. We introduced spacer sequences of various lengths (35, 70, 100, and 200 bp) that lack ATGs between SNV U3 and SNV RU5 (Fig. 1A). RPAs on total cellular RNA were performed with homologous uniformly labeled 5' RNA probes (Fig. 1A and B). The results verified that the spacer sequences are transcribed (Fig. 1C). Results of multiple independent transfection assays performed in triplicate indicate that the spacer sequences did not significantly reduce Gag production (Table 2). These results indicate that SNV RU5 activity is sustained when RU5 is repositioned 35 to 200 nt downstream of U3 and imply that precise proximity to the RNA start site is not necessary for activity.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of spacer insertions between SNV U3 and RU5 on Gag production
|
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Secondary structure of 165 nucleotide SNV RU5 predicted by the M-Fold software (20, 35). This structure depicts the most stable of seven predicted structures. The position of the R/U5 border is shown. Asterisks indicate positions of original deletions between A and B and between B and C. The predicted free energy ( G) is -54 kcal/mol.
|
-32P]ATP, and subjected to digestion with each RNase. The RNase concentrations were titrated, and the profiles of digestion products were separated on denaturing sequencing gels and visualized by phosphorimager analysis. Alkaline hydrolysis of A-region and C-region RNAs was used to generate a ladder representing each nucleotide of the RNA. The assays were repeated multiple times with independently transcribed RNAs, and digestion patterns did not change. The RNase titrations clearly show sites that are readily accessible to cleavage (unpaired loop nucleotides) as opposed to less accessible sites (stem-and-bulge nucleotides). A region RNA showed strong RNase A and T1 cleavage products in the predicted terminal loop region and RNase A cleavage of the CU bulge (Fig. 3). The observation that strong cleavage begins 2 nt upstream of the terminal loop predicted by M-Fold suggests fluidity between a terminal loop of UUGU and a second predicted structure that contains a terminal loop of CAUUG. The RNase V1 digestions verify the predicted double-stranded stem.
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Enzymatic digestion of A region RNA. (A) After transcription in vitro, the A region RNA was labeled at the 5' end with [ -32P]ATP and digested with various concentrations of RNase T1, A, and V1. A representative of four gels is shown. Lanes: P, probe; AH, alkaline hydrolysis ladder; G, RNase T1 sequencing ladder; , X174 ladder. Four lanes are included for each RNase digestion. The first lane contains only buffer. For RNase T1, samples were incubated with 0, 1, 0.1, and 0.01 U of RNase. For RNase A, samples were incubated with 0, 10-3, 10-4, and 10-5 U of RNase. For RNase V1, samples were incubated with 0, 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 U of RNase. The position and sequence of the terminal loop CAUUG and the CU bulge are indicated. (B) Diagram of M-Fold-predicted A structure, with areas cleaved by the RNases indicated.
|
![]() View larger version (77K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Enzymatic digestion of C-region RNA. (A) After transcription in vitro, the C-region RNA was labeled at the 5' end with [ -32P]ATP and digested with various concentrations of RNase T1, A, and V1. A representative of four gels is shown. Lanes: P, probe; AH, alkaline hydrolysis ladder; G, RNase T1 sequencing ladder; , X174 ladder. Four lanes are included for each RNase digestion at the concentrations given in the legend to Fig. 3. The positions of the terminal loop UACUG and the UGU, GUG, and UUG bulges are indicated. (B) Diagram of M-Fold-predicted C structure and areas cleaved by the RNases (indicated as in Fig. 3B).
|
A and C stem-loop structures are necessary for Gag production.
Substitution mutations were introduced into pYW100 to dissect the contribution of the secondary structure motifs and to analyze specific sequence motifs (Fig. 5). The first group of substitution mutations were designed to disrupt base pairing of either the A or C stem (A, A', C, and C'). Each of these substitution mutations reduced but did not eliminate Gag production (Fig. 6). The levels are similar in magnitude to the levels exhibited by the
A or
C deletion mutants (Table 1). When the A and C' substitution mutations were combined to simultaneously disrupt the predicted A and C stems (AC'), Gag production was eliminated. This loss of function is analogous to that with the
AC deletion mutant (Table 1) and posits the model that the A and C stem structures are necessary for SNV RU5 activity.
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Summary of the SNV RU5 point mutations. Depicted at the top is the parental SNV/HIV-1 reporter plasmid. White rectangle, SNV LTR; black line, HIV-1 5' UTR; black rectangle, HIV-1 gag/pol genes; circle, polyadenylation signal. Splice sites are indicated by an asterisk. The bent arrow indicates the RNA start site, which defines the U3/R border. Nucleotide numbers delineating regions A, B, and C are shown in italics above wild-type A, B, and C regions (not drawn to scale). Plasmid names are on the left. Nucleotide numbers correspond to the first mutated nucleotide at each mutation site and the altered sequence. Lines indicate unchanged sequence. "X" indicates deleted nucleotides.
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Relative Gag levels produced in 293 cells transfected with the indicated HIV-1 Gag reporter plasmids. 293 cells were cotransfected with wild-type SNV RU5 (ABC) or mutant Gag reporter plasmids and pGL3 luciferase expression plasmid. Cell lysates were analyzed for Gag production by ELISA and for Luc activity by a chemiluminescent Luc assay. Values are from a representative triplicate experiment among more than 10 independent experiments. Gag levels are shown relative to SNV RU5 (ABC), and a value of 1.0 is equivalent to 40 ng of Gag per ml. Gag levels are standardized to cotransfected Luc. Standard deviations are shown. <MD, less than minimum detectable Gag level. *, significantly different from the value for SNV RU5 as determined by the Student t test (P < 0.005).
|
Nucleotides distinct from a conserved functional CTE motif are necessary for SNV RU5 activity. Interestingly, the sequence motif CCUAC, which is repeated in the A region and the C region (Fig. 2), resembles the CCUAG motif, which is repeated in the functionally necessary unpaired loop regions of the CTE (32). Base substitutions were introduced individually and in combination to change CCUAC to CAAGC or GCCCG (Atif, Ctif, and ACtif) (Fig. 5). In all three cases, Gag production remained between 85 and 100% of wild-type levels, indicating that maintenance of the CCUAC motifs is not necessary for activity of SNV RU5 (Fig. 6).
Unpaired nucleotides in A are necessary for SNV RU5 activity.
To investigate nucleotides within A that are necessary for activity, base substitutions were introduced into the A terminal loop sequences that change UUGUU to AACAA (Aloop and Aloop
BC) (Fig. 5). In addition, unpaired nucleotides in the stem (CU and U bulges) were deleted (Abulge
BC). These mutations were predicted by M-Fold to maintain the stem structure while mutating the unpaired regions. When the A terminal loop sequence was mutated in wild-type SNV RU5 (Aloop), Gag production was unchanged (compare ABC to Aloop in Fig. 6). Compared to the parental deletion mutant
BC (Table 1), the Aloop
BC mutant exhibited partial activity of 40% (Fig. 6). Deletion of the single nucleotide bulges independently of the loop mutations (Abulge
BC) produced a minor but statistically significant reduction, from 40 to 25% (P = 0.04). The A loop-and-bulge mutations were combined to examine the possibility that these unpaired nucleotides act together to convey function (Aall and Aall
BC) (Fig. 5). Compared to ABC, the Aall mutant exhibited a reduction in Gag production to 60% (Fig. 6), a trend that is similar to that seen with the
A deletion mutant (Table 1) and verified the earlier conclusion that C is sufficient for partial activity. The Aall
BC mutant exhibited complete elimination of Gag production. These data indicate that individual mutation of unpaired loop-and-bulge regions in A do not abolish SNV RU5 function, while combined mutations of these regions result in loss of activity.
To verify that the stem-loop structure was maintained after introduction of these mutations, the RNase A, T1, and V1 digestion patterns were compared between A and Aall
BC (Fig. 7). As expected, the mutation of the terminal loop region (from UUGUU to AACAA) changed the sensitivity to RNase A. The AACAA motif was solely sensitive to RNase A cleavage at the C residue. RNase V1 digested the stem region similarly for both RNAs. The results demonstrate that, as predicted, the stem structure is maintained and that the loss of function is attributable to mutation of unpaired nucleotides.
![]() View larger version (85K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Enzymatic digestion and position of mutations of Aall BC. (A) After transcription in vitro, Aall BC RNA was end labeled with [ -32P]ATP and digested with various concentrations of RNase T1, A, and V1. Digested samples from A RNA were run in parallel for direct comparison. Lanes: P, probe; AH, alkaline hydrolysis ladder; G, RNase T1 sequencing ladder; , X174 ladder. Four lanes are included for each RNase digestion and were used at the same concentrations as in Fig. 3B. Positions of the A terminal loop CAUUG and the Aall BC terminal loop AACAA are shown. (B) Structure of wild-type A region, with deleted and mutated nucleotides indicated.
|
BC) eliminated Gag production, while individual mutation reduced but did not eliminate Gag production. Collectively, these results indicate that the UUGUU sequence and the U and CU sequences function together to support optimal SNV RU5 activity. Our enzymatic digestion data on Aall
BC RNA verified that these mutations are in unpaired regions of the A stem-loop. Loss of Gag production is not attributable to reduction in cytoplasmic gag RNA. RPAs were used to assess the possibilities that the elimination of Gag protein production in response to SNV RU5 mutation is attributable to a defect in maintenance of steady-state RNA level, to a change in splicing efficiency, or to cytoplasmic RNA accumulation. The RPA probe used in the experiments spans the 3' 194 nt of the HIV-1 UTR and the 5' 106 nt of the gag coding region and overlaps the 5' splice donor site (6). Total cellular RNA was evaluated from the wild-type SNV RU5 reporter (ABC), the nonfunctional AC' and antisense SNV RU5 mutants, and the functional AA'CC' compensatory mutant. The RPAs revealed that similar steady-state levels of unspliced HIV-1 gag RNA are sustained despite loss of Gag production in response to the AC' and antisense mutations (Fig. 8). Similar ratios of spliced to unspliced reporter transcript are observed. Furthermore, the rescue of Gag production by the AA'CC' compensatory mutation is not attributable to an increased steady-state gag RNA level. The data indicate that elimination of Gag production by SNV RU5 mutation is not attributable to a reduced steady-state RNA level or a deleterious effect on RNA splicing efficiency.
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Quantification of HIV-1 reporter transcripts in total cellular RNA by RPA and Gag protein by ELISA. (A) Wild-type SNV RU5 (ABC) and selected mutant plasmids were transfected into 293 cells. At 48 h posttransfection, total cellular RNA was isolated and treated with DNase, and 25 µg was subjected to RPA with an HIV-specific probe complementary to the HIV-1 5' UTR and a GAPDH RNA probe to control for RNA loading. Transcripts were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and RNA signals were quantified by phosphorimager analysis. Undigested probes are labeled in italics, lanes are labeled with the reporter RNA, and RNase protection products are indicated on the right. RNA signals were quantified by ImageQuant version 4.2 software (Molecular Dynamics). (B) Unspliced and spliced RNA phosphorimager units (P.I.) were normalized to GAPDH RNA levels, and Gag levels were measured by ELISA.
|
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Quantification of nuclear and cytoplasmic levels of HIV-1 reporter RNA by RPA. HIV-1 Gag reporter plasmids were transfected into 293 cells. At 48 h posttransfection, nuclear and cytoplasmic RNAs were isolated and treated with DNase, and 15 µg of nuclear or 25 µg of cytoplasmic RNA was subjected to RPA with the HIV-1 5' UTR and a GAPDH RNA probe. Transcripts were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and RNA signals were quantified by phosphorimager analysis. Undigested probes are labeled in italics, lanes are labeled with the reporter RNA, and RNase protection products are indicated on the right. (A) RPA of nuclear (N) and cytoplasmic (C) RNA from 293 cells transfected with pSVgagpolrre in the absence (-) or presence (+) of Rev. (B) RPA of nuclear (N) and cytoplasmic (C) RNA from 293 cells transfected with wild-type SNV RU5 (ABC) and selected mutants (6). (C) Summary of cytoplasmic gag RNA and Gag protein expressed from SNV RU5 and selected mutants. The RNA signals were quantified from the RPA by ImageQuant version 4.2 software (Molecular Dynamics) and normalized to GAPDH RNA levels. P.I., phosphorimager units. Gag levels were measured by ELISA. <MD, less than minimum detectable levels.
|
|
|
|---|
Despite elimination of protein production, the AC' and antisense CBA reporter plasmids exhibit similar levels of unspliced gag RNA in the cytoplasm. Previous data from our lab showed that HIV-1 gag reporter plasmids that contain a deletion of SNV RU5, but maintain the U3 promoter region, also exhibit similar levels of unspliced gag RNA in the cytoplasm despite reduction of HIV-1 Gag protein production (6). Control experiments with the Rev-dependent HIV-1 gag reporter pSVgagpolrre eliminated the possibility that the signal is attributable to nuclear contamination. A speculative explanation is that the SNV U3 promoter region, which is common to all the mutants, directs recruitment of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) components that modulate nuclear export. Recent mechanistic evaluation of pre-mRNA processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has shown that RNP components, which are recruited cotranscriptionally in conjunction with RNA polymerase II transcription machinery, effect pre-mRNA processing and export events (9, 17-19). The necessity of de novo transcription for activity of SNV RU5 has already been demonstrated (8) and supports the possibility that SNV U3 recruits a nuclear protein(s) that affects nuclear export.
The finding that SNV RU5 structural motifs modulate translational utilization of gag RNA indicates that a candidate SNV RU5-interactive cellular protein is the nuclear protein Sam68, because Sam68 has recently been shown to enhance cytoplasmic utilization of unspliced CTE-containing HIV-1 gag RNA (7). Our preliminary data demonstrate that while Sam68 enhances expression from SNV RU5-containing pYW100 18-fold in 293 cells, expression of the nonfunctional SNV RU5 antisense mutant is also facilitated (T. M. Roberts and K. Boris-Lawrie, unpublished results) (31). These results indicate that SNV RU5 is not necessary for the positive effect of Sam68 on this reporter RNA and do not support the notion that Sam68 mediates SNV RU5 activity.
Another possible SNV RU5-interactive cellular protein is an RNA helicase that facilitates hnRNP decondensation, similar to the role postulated for Dbp5 during mRNA export (12, 34). Once the hypothetical helicase is in the cytoplasm, its activity facilitates translational efficiency by neutralization of structural barriers to ribosome scanning. In retroviral RNA, a collection of structural barriers is imposed by the packaging signal and other necessary replication motifs throughout the extensive 5' UTR (13, 21, 25). An intriguing possibility is that the SNV RU5-interactive protein neutralizes these structures and facilitates translation at the expense of viral RNA packaging. The protein would therefore act as a molecular switch to define the cytoplasmic fate of virion RNA (5). In this model, SNV RU5 would facilitate cytoplasmic utilization of unspliced viral RNA as mRNA template for protein synthesis at the expense of available genomic RNA for packaging into progeny virions. Experiments that characterize the cellular SNV RU5-interactive proteins will test these possibilities and are also expected to illuminate molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic posttranscriptional control.
C reporter plasmids. We thank Stacey Hull and members of the Center for Retrovirus Research for comments on the manuscript and stimulating discussions. This work was supported by grants from the American Cancer Society, Ohio Division, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R29A140851), and the National Cancer Institute (P30CA16058).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»