Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, November 2003, p. 11964-11972, Vol. 77, No. 22
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.22.11964-11972.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710,1 Jefferiss Research Trust Laboratories, Wright-Fleming Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine at St. Mary's, London W2 1PG, United Kingdom2
Received 27 May 2003/ Accepted 28 July 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
21-bp dsRNAs, termed small interfering RNA (siRNA) duplexes, by a cellular enzyme called dicer (13, 16, 20, 22). One strand of this duplex is then incorporated into the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC), where it acts as a guide RNA that specifically targets RISC proteins to homologous mRNAs (13, 28, 40). Once RISC has bound an mRNA bearing a perfectly matched sequence, the mRNA is cleaved by an unknown endonuclease component. After release of the RISC, the mRNA is degraded by cellular exonucleases, thus resulting in specific posttranscriptional silencing of the target gene (14, 17, 30). Although RNAi was first described in Caenorhabditis elegans, it quickly became apparent that RNAi is closely related to similar phenomena previously described in plants and certain fungi and it is now clear that the ability to mount an RNAi response is conserved among all higher eukaryotes (14, 17, 30). RNAi and related phenomena have been found to play important roles in the regulation of gene expression during development and in defense of the genome against random mutagenesis induced by transposable elements (14, 17, 21, 30, 45).
An additional activity mediated by RNAi, at least in plants, is antiviral defense (7, 37). Although it remains unclear whether RNAi also has a normal role in antiviral defense in vertebrates, the induction of an RNAi response can confer specific protection against several viral pathogens in culture, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), hepatitis C virus, influenza virus, poliovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and hepatitis B virus (2, 5, 11, 12, 15, 18, 19, 23, 33, 36, 41, 44, 50). There has therefore been considerable interest in the development of RNAi as a possible treatment for virus-induced diseases.
Although RNAi can be effectively induced in many lower eukaryotes by the simple introduction of long dsRNAs, this is not possible in vertebrate cells because of activation of the interferon response, which causes a global inhibition of mRNA translation and frequently leads to apoptosis (27). However, a gene-specific RNAi response can be induced by direct transfection of
21-bp siRNA duplexes or, alternatively, by introduction of plasmids that encode short RNA hairpins that can be processed by dicer to give siRNA duplexes (3, 8, 34, 43, 51). Because induction of the interferon response requires dsRNAs of >30 bp (27), this strategy allows specific gene silencing by RNAi in the absence of the global gene silencing noted upon the introduction of long dsRNAs.
Although protection against HIV-1 after transfection of cells with siRNA duplexes or siRNA expression plasmids has been reported by several groups (5, 15, 18, 23, 33, 44), this strategy has several problems, including the transient nature of the antiviral effect that is produced and the difficulty of introducing nucleic acids into primary cells. In addition, targeting of a virus that displays the sequence variability of HIV-1 by using a highly sequence-specific reagent such as an siRNA might be predicted to rapidly lead to the selection of resistant viral variants. To address these concerns, we have identified an siRNA that can effectively block the expression of the cellular protein CCR5, a key coreceptor for both initial infection and subsequent dissemination of primary HIV-1 isolates in humans (38). We have also developed a lentivirus vector that can express siRNAs, targeted either to CCR5 or the essential HIV-1 tat gene, at a level sufficient to confer a stable antiviral phenotype on both cell lines and primary macrophages. These data suggest that it may be possible to confer a stable phenotype of virus resistance on cells and tissues in vivo by targeting either cellular genes that serve as essential viral cofactors or highly conserved viral RNA sequences.
|
|
|---|
A 1,471-bp fragment of pNL-Luc-ADA encoding vpu, the first exon of tat and rev, and part of env and vpr was deleted by digestion with SalI and NheI. The sequence encoding the Vpr carboxy terminus was then restored by ligating a PCR-derived DNA fragment into the SalI and NheI sites. The PCR primers used also inserted unique SacII and XmaI sites immediately downstream of vpr. Most of the 3' long terminal repeat (LTR) U3 region (positions -418 to -18) was then deleted by a recombinant PCR with primers that introduced unique ClaI and XbaI sites. A cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter linked to the selectable blasticidin resistance (blr) marker was then inserted between unique BamHI and XhoI sites to generate pNL-SIN-CMV-BLR. These additional manipulations removed further segments of the viral env, rev, and nef genes, as well as the luc indicator gene present in pNL-Luc-ADA. However, the HIV-1 Rev response element was left intact (Fig. 1A).
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Expression of siRNAs by a lentivirus vector. (A) Schematic representation of the NL-SIN-CMV-BLR lentivirus vector. The blasticidin resistance (blr) gene was introduced as a selectable marker. Unique restriction enzyme sites are indicated. An siRNA expression cassette containing the human H1 promoter can be introduced in place of most of the 3' LTR U3 region. (B) Predicted stem-loop structure of the Tat siRNA precursor encoded by the pNL-H1-siTat lentivirus vector. Arrows indicate the 5' ends of the mature siRNAs encoded by this vector. (C) Primer extension analysis. pH1, cells transfected with 1 µg of pSuper; pH1-siTat, cells transfected with 1 µg of pH1-siTat; NL-H1, cells transduced with the NL-H1 lentivirus vector; NL-H1-siTat, cells transduced with NL-H1-siTat. A probe that detects the 3' or antisense strand was used for lanes 2 to 6, and a probe specific for the 5' or sense strand was used for lanes 7 to 12. Lane 1 contained a labeled 21-nt RNA marker, while lane 7 contained a synthetic 21-nt RNA identical to the first 21 nt of the 5' arm of the siRNA precursor as a positive (POS) control. Mock, mock-transfected wild-type 293T cells.
|
Primary monocyte culture. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy, HIV-1-negative donors were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation. The cells were then resuspended in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium and plated at 2 x 106 per well in 24-well tissue culture plates. After 3 h of culture, adherent cells were washed extensively with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% human AB serum (Sigma) and 1,000 U of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (R&D Systems) for 1 week to allow differentiation into monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM).
Preparation of virus stocks and transduced cells.
Human 293T cells were maintained as previously described (5). To prepare HIV-1 stocks, 293T cells were transfected with 2 µg of pNL-Luc-ADA, pNL-Luc-HXB, or pNL-Luc-1549 as previously described (48). Stocks of vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein G (VSV-G)-pseudotyped HIV-1 virions were produced by transfection of 293T cells with 1.5 µg of pNL-ADA and 0.5 µg of pHIT/G. HIV-1-based lentivirus vectors expressing siRNAs were prepared by cotransfection of 293T cells with 1.8 µg of the lentivirus vector, 0.1 µg of pcRev, 0.1 µg of pcTat, and 50 ng of pHIT/G. The culture medium was replaced 16 h later, and supernatant media were harvested
40 h posttransfection and passed through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter. Virus yields were measured by p24 Gag antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (NEN Life Science).
RNA and protein expression analysis. Total RNA was prepared from 293T cells transfected with a pSUPER-derived plasmid (pH1 plasmids), or from 293T cells that had been transduced with a lentivirus vector, by using Trizol in accordance with the manufacturer's (Gibco BRL) instructions. Primer extension reactions were performed with 10 µg of total RNA with the primer extension system-avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Extension products were analyzed by electrophoresis through denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized by autoradiography.
Northern analysis was performed essentially as previously described (5). Total RNA (30 µg) was separated through a 1% agarose gel containing formaldehyde and transferred to a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham). RNA was fixed by UV cross-linking with a Stratalinker (Stratagene). HIV-1, CCR5, and CD4 mRNAs were detected with 32P-labeled random primed DNA probes.
Western analysis of protein expression in transfected 293T cells was performed as previously described (5). Briefly, cell lysates prepared from transfected 293T cells were boiled for 5 min in sodium dodecyl sulfate loading buffer containing 10% 2-mercaptoethanol. Proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham). Western analysis was performed with a rabbit polyclonal antiserum directed against the HIV-1 Tat protein (1:1,000) or a mouse monoclonal antibody directed against ß-galactosidase (ß-gal; 1:2,000; Promega). The anti-Tat serum used was raised with recombinant full-length Tat and has been provided to the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (catalog no. 705). Bound antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxide-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Amersham) at a 1:3,000 dilution and visualized by chemiluminescence.
For quantitation of cell surface CCR5, transduced 293T cells were transfected with pCMV5/CCR5 and pEGFP. At 48 h after transfection, cells were stained with a monoclonal anti-CCR5 serum conjugated with Cy-Chrome (BD PharMingen) on ice for 30 min. The cells were then washed extensively with PBS, fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS, and then analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) on a FACScan.
Luciferase reporter virus assay. Lentivirus vector-transduced 293T cells were transfected with 100 ng of pCMV5/CD4 and 20 ng of pCMV5/CCR5 or pCMV5/CXCR4 by using calcium phosphate. In some experiments, cells were additionally transfected with 10 ng of pHIV/Tat or pHIV/SynTat or with the parental pBC12/CMV plasmid as a negative control. At 48 h after transfection, the cells were infected with 20 ng of p24 Gag antigen of the NL-Luc-ADA virus for pCMV5/CCR5-transfected cells or the NL-Luc-HXB virus for pCMV5/CXCR4-transfected cells. After 48 h, cells were lysed in 200 µl of lysis buffer (Promega) and luciferase activities were determined with a Lumat LB9501 luminometer.
For infection of macrophages, 7-day-old cultures of MDM were infected overnight with 100 ng of p24 antigen from one of the NL-H1 lentivirus vectors. On the next day, cells were washed with PBS and placed in fresh medium. The cells were allowed to recover for 1 further day and then subjected to a second round of infection with a lentivirus vector. Two days after the second infection, the transduced MDM were infected with 20 ng of p24 antigen from the luciferase reporter virus NL-Luc-ADA or NL-Luc-1549. The cells were harvested 72 h later for luciferase assay as described above.
|
|
|---|
pNL-SIN-CMV-BLR was derived from pNL-Luc-ADA (48) by deletion of part or all of the HIV-1 vpu, tat, rev, env, and nef genes, as well as almost all of the U3 region in the 3' LTR. The viral gag, pol, vif, and vpr genes, as well as the 5' LTR and the Rev response element, were, however, left intact, as were all of the cis-acting sequences required for efficient genome packaging, reverse transcription, and integration. In place of the deleted sequences, we inserted a cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter driving the blr selectable marker, as well as unique ClaI and XbaI sites in the 3' LTR U3 region. These can be used to insert an siRNA expression cassette consisting of the RNA polymerase III-dependent H1 promoter (3, 31) linked to a sequence designed to form a short RNA stem-loop sequence that can be processed by endogenous dicer to yield an siRNA duplex (3, 34) (Fig. 1). This cassette replaces much of the 3' LTR U3 region and will therefore be duplicated during reverse transcription to replace the promoter and enhancer sequences in the U3 region of the 5' LTR, thus making this a self-inactivating double-copy lentivirus expression vector.
The initial siRNA target sequence chosen was derived from nucleotides (nt) 84 to 111 of the HIV-1 tat ORF and is shown in Fig. 1B. The sequence inserted into the pSuper siRNA expression plasmid (3) is predicted to give rise to a 26-bp dsRNA stem flanked by an 8-nt terminal loop and a 2-nt 3' overhang derived from the transcription termination sequence for polymerase III. This expression cassette was excised from the resultant pH1-siTat plasmid by cleavage with XbaI and ClaI and then inserted into the pNL-SIN-CMV-BLR lentivirus vector to give pNL-H1-siTat (Fig. 1A). The lentivirus vector encoded by pNL-H1-siTat was packaged by cotransfection into 293T cells along with plasmids expressing HIV-1 Tat and Rev cDNAs and VSV-G. Packaged virions (50 ng of p24 Gag) were used to infect 106 293T cells, and transductants were selected with 10 µg of blasticidin per ml. Generally, >60% of the infected cells were successfully transduced with this protocol.
Primer extension was used to measure the production of siRNAs from either the initial pH1-siTat expression plasmid in transfected 293T cells or the lentivirus NL-H1-siTat vector in pooled, transduced 293T cells (Fig. 1C). The antisense or 3' arm of the predicted stem-loop precursor (Fig. 1B) was found to give rise to two overlapping siRNAs 21 or 22 nt in length, measured from the base of the stem, and equivalent levels of each siRNA were observed in both transfected and transduced 293T cells (Fig. 1C, lanes 4 and 6). These two products presumably arise from processing by dicer at two adjacent cleavage sites in the predicted RNA hairpin (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the 5' or sense arm did not give rise to any detectable siRNA product in vivo, although a synthetic 21-nt RNA homologous to the predicted siRNA did give rise to a readily detectable extension product (Fig. 1C, lane 7). Therefore, the RNA stem-loop structure depicted in Fig. 1B behaves like a micro-RNA stem-loop precursor in that only one arm of the precursor appears to have been stably included in the RISC (14, 17).
Stable expression of an siRNA specific for HIV-1 tat. Previously, we have shown that transfection of an siRNA duplex specific for the HIV-1 tat gene can effectively block HIV-1 replication in culture (5). To test whether expression of a Tat-specific siRNA from a lentivirus vector would exert a similar phenotype, we transfected 293T cells transduced with NL-H1-siTat or with NL-H1, which is not predicted to express any siRNA, with expression vectors encoding HIV-1 Tat and ß-gal. As shown in Fig. 2A, we noted a significant drop in Tat expression, compared to that of the ß-gal control, in NL-H1-siTat-transduced cells. To test whether the Tat siRNA would have any effect on HIV-1 replication, we next infected control and transduced 293T cells with HIV-1 virions pseudotyped with VSV-G and then quantified virus replication by measuring the level of secreted p24 Gag protein produced by the infected cells. As shown in Fig. 2B, the NL-H1-siTat-transduced cells were largely incapable of giving rise to progeny virions while control NL-H1-transduced cells or nontransduced 293T cells gave rise to high levels of progeny virions, as measured by p24 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of the culture supernatants. As shown in the Northern analysis presented in Fig. 2C, the lack of progeny virion production in the NL-H1-siTat-transduced cells coincided with a large drop in the expression of all HIV-1 mRNA species after infection, as would be predicted if Tat function was largely blocked.
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Inhibition of HIV-1 replication with an siRNA expressed from a lentivirus vector. (A) Normal 293T cells (lane 2) or cells transduced by lentivirus vectors (lanes 3 and 4) were cotransfected with 25 ng each of pBC12/CMV/ß-gal and pHIV/Tat. At 48 h posttransfection, protein expression levels were assayed by Western analysis. Mock-transfected 293T cells served as the negative control (NEG). (B) Specific inhibition of HIV-1 replication in 293T cells transduced with the NL-H1-siTat lentivirus vector. 293T cells were infected overnight with VSV-G-pseudotyped HIV-1, and viral replication was measured by p24 Gag antigen production at 48 h after infection. 293T cells infected with wild-type, i.e., nonpseudotyped, HIV-1 served as the negative control (NEG), while transfected, nontransduced 293T cells served as the positive control (POS). The results shown are the average of three experiments with the standard deviation. (C) Total RNA was extracted from 293T cells used in panel B and subjected to Northern analysis with an HIV-1 LTR-specific probe. The approximate sizes of the three classes of HIV-1 transcript are indicated.
|
As an alternative approach to the demonstration of specificity, we therefore investigated whether HIV-1 proviral transcription could be rescued by cotransfection of an expression plasmid encoding a tat gene in which the siRNA target sequence was mutated, but not by a similar vector encoding wild-type Tat. The expression plasmid chosen, pHIV/SynTat, is identical to pHIV/Tat except that it encodes a synthetic tat gene encoding a number of nucleic acid sequence changes that do not, however, affect either the sequence or the function of the encoded Tat protein (1, 46). Importantly, the tat gene carried by pHIV/SynTat differs at three positions within the chosen siRNA target sequence (Fig. 3A) and therefore would be predicted to be largely or entirely resistant to RNAi induced by pNL-H1-siTat.
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Inhibition of HIV-1 gene expression by NL-H1-siTat is specific. (A) Sequences of the wild-type (WT) and mutant synthetic (Syn) forms of the Tat siRNA target sequence. (B) 293T cells transduced with NL-H1 (lanes 2 and 4) or NL-H1-siTat (lanes 3 and 5) were transfected with 25 ng each of pBC12/CMV/ß-gal and either wild-type pHIV/Tat (lanes 2 and 3) or the mutant pHIV/SynTat expression plasmid (lanes 4 and 5). Western analysis was performed as described in the legend to Fig. 2A. (C) 293T cells transduced with NL-H1 or NL-H1-siTat were transfected with expression plasmids encoding CD4 and CCR5 and, where indicated, 10 ng of either pHIV/Tat or pHIV/SynTat. At 48 h after transfection, the transduced, transfected cells were infected with the NL-Luc-ADA indicator virus and induced luciferase levels were assayed a further 48 h later. NEG, mock-transfected, NL-H1-transduced cells. The average of three experiments and the standard deviation are indicated. NEG, negative control.
|
To determine whether HIV-1 proviral transcription could be selectively rescued by the mutant tat gene carried by pHIV/SynTat, we transfected NL-H1-siTat-transduced cells with expression plasmids encoding CD4 and CCR5 and 10 ng of either pHIV/Tat or pHIV/SynTat or a negative control plasmid. NL-H1-transduced cells transfected with vectors encoding CD4 and CCR5 only served as a positive control, while nontransfected NL-H1 cells served as a negative control. At 48 h later, these cultures were infected with the previously described NL-Luc-ADA indicator virus containing the luc indicator gene substituted for nef. Importantly, the luc mRNA encoded by this virus is expressed in the absence of Rev function and is not predicted to contain the tat siRNA target sequence. As shown in Fig. 3C, transfection with the pHIV/SynTat plasmid, bearing a mutated siRNA target sequence, indeed fully rescued luciferase expression by the infecting indicator virus, while the wild-type Tat expression plasmid pHIV/Tat had little or no positive effect. We therefore concluded that the observed inhibition of HIV-1 replication and gene expression was indeed due to the specific degradation of viral mRNAs bearing the tat siRNA target sequence.
An important goal of this research was to confer a stable, virus-resistant phenotype on cells transduced with the lentivirus siRNA expression vector, rather than the transient resistance characteristic of cells transfected with siRNAs. To test whether resistance to HIV-1 replication was indeed stable, we compared the virus resistance of NL-H1-siTat-transduced cells after 1 week versus 12 weeks in culture. In this experiment, the transduced 293T cells were first transfected with expression plasmids encoding CD4 and either CCR5 or CXCR4. After 48 h, we then infected the transduced, transfected 293T cells with the previously described R5-tropic NL-Luc-ADA indicator virus or the X4-tropic NL-Luc-HXB indicator virus (6, 48). As shown in Fig. 4, 293T cells transduced with NL-H1-siTat remained nonpermissive for productive HIV-1 infection by either indicator virus after 12 weeks in culture, in contrast to the control NL-H1-transduced cells. Primer extension analyses revealed that the level of expression of the siRNA encoded by the NL-H1-siTat provirus was essentially the same after 1 week or 12 weeks in culture (data not shown). We therefore concluded that the antiviral state induced by the lentivirus NL-H1-siTat siRNA expression vector was stable over the period tested.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Stable inhibition of HIV-1 gene expression in NL-H1-siTat-transduced cells. 293T cells transduced with NL-H1-siTat were cultured under selection for either 1 week or 12 weeks. Transduced cells were then transfected with expression plasmids encoding CD4 and CCR5 or CD4 and CXCR4 and infected with the R5-tropic NL-Luc-ADA or X4-tropic NL-Luc-HXB indicator virus, and induced luciferase activities were determined 2 days later. The average of three experiments and the standard deviation are indicated. NEG, negative control.
|
To address this issue, we designed siRNAs targeted to the CCR5 coreceptor. CCR5 is critical for HIV-1 transmission between humans and is necessary for infection by the majority of primary HIV-1 isolates (38). Although important for HIV-1 infection, CCR5 is dispensable for human health and well-being, as shown by the existence of individuals who are homozygous for a point mutation that totally blocks CCR5 expression (25).
We identified an siRNA, directed against residues 953 to 979 of the human ccr5 ORF, that was highly effective at inhibiting CCR5 expression by cotransfection (data not shown). This sequence was incorporated into the stem of a predicted RNA stem-loop structure, expressed under the control of the H1 promoter and then introduced into the pNL-SIN-CMV-BLR lentivirus vector to give pNL-H1-CCR5, as shown in Fig. 1. This lentivirus siRNA expression vector was then packaged in 293T cells and used to infect other 293T cells, and transductants were selected by culture in blasticidin.
To test whether the siRNA expressed from the lentivirus vector would indeed exert an inhibitory effect on CCR5 expression, we transfected pooled 293T cells transduced with NL-H1-siCCR5, with NL-H1 as a control, with plasmids expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP), and with CCR5. At 48 h after transfection, cells were stained with a monoclonal antibody specific for CCR5 and subjected to FACS to quantitate the level of cell surface CCR5 expression on GFP-expressing cells. Although the levels of GFP expression in the different transduced cells were similar (data not shown), the level of CCR5 expression observed was dramatically lower in the cells transduced with NL-H1-siCCR5 than in the control NL-H1-transduced cells (Fig. 5A).
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Inhibition of CCR5 expression by a lentivirus-expressed siRNA. (A) Transduced 293T cells were transfected with plasmids expressing CCR5 and GFP. At 48 h after transfection, the level of cell surface CCR5 expression on GFP-positive cells was analyzed by FACS with an anti-CCR5 monoclonal antibody. CCR5 expression on NL-H1-siCCR5-transduced cells is represented by shading, and that on NL-H1-transduced cells is represented by the open area. (B) Transduced 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding CD4 and CCR5 or CD4 and CXCR4. At 48 h after transfection, CD4+ CCR5+ cells were infected with NL-Luc-ADA while CD4+ CXCR4+ cells were infected with NL-Luc-HXB. Induced luciferase levels were determined 48 h after infection and are indicated. NEG, nontransfected 293T cells. The average of three experiments and the standard deviation are indicated. (C) Transduced or control 293T cells were transfected with CCR5 and CD4 expression plasmids. At 48 h after transfection, total RNA was extracted and subjected to Northern analysis to measure CCR5 mRNA (top) and CD4 mRNA (bottom) expression. Mock-transfected 293T cells served as a negative control (NEG), while wild-type 293T cells transfected with CCR5 and CD4 served as a positive control (POS).
|
If the siRNA expressed in the NL-H1-siCCR5-transduced cells is indeed functional, then it should induce the selective degradation of CCR5 mRNA (14, 17, 30). To test this hypothesis, we prepared total RNA from cultures transfected as described above and performed Northern analysis for either the CCR5 or the CD4 mRNA expressed from the cotransfected plasmids. As shown in Fig. 5C, we observed a marked and specific inhibition of the level of CCR5 mRNA expression in the NL-H1-siCCR5-transduced cells compared to that in control NL-H1-transduced cells, while the level of CD4 mRNA expression remained constant. Together, these data indicate that the CCR5-specific siRNA produced by the NL-H1-siCCR5 lentivirus vector is able to specifically reduce not only CCR5 mRNA and protein expression but also infection by R5-tropic HIV-1.
Inhibition of HIV-1 replication in primary macrophages by siRNAs expressed from lentivirus vectors. The data presented thus far were all obtained with the human cell line 293T, and we were therefore anxious to confirm that the lentivirus siRNA expression vectors would also function in primary cells. We therefore used the lentivirus vectors to transduce primary MDM. It has previously been shown by several groups that these nondividing cells can be effectively infected by HIV-1 or by HIV-1-derived lentivirus vectors (4, 24, 32, 49).
To obtain good levels of infection without selection and without having to concentrate the lentivirus vector preparations and to see if we could observe functional synergy between two distinct lentivirus siRNA expression vectors, we transduced each MDM culture twice over a 2-day interval (Fig. 6). Two days after the second transduction, the MDM were infected with aliquots of the R5-tropic NL-Luc-ADA or the X4-tropic NL-Luc-1549 indicator virus. The env gene used in NL-Luc-1549 is derived from a primary X4-tropic HIV-1 strain that, unlike laboratory X4-tropic HIV-1 isolates, is able to infect primary macrophages with exclusively endogenous CXCR4 as a coreceptor (48).
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Single-cycle assay of HIV-1 replication in primary macrophages. MDM were cultured for 7 days in the presence of macrophage colony-stimulating factor and then transduced twice with a lentivirus vector stock over a 2-day period. The order of vector infection is shown; e.g., siCCR5 denotes MDM transduced twice with NL-H1-siCCR5, while siCCR5/siTat denotes MDM transduced first with NL-H1-siCCR5 and then with NL-H1-siTat. Two days later, the transduced MDM were infected with the R5-tropic reporter virus NL-Luc-ADA (A) or X4-tropic reporter virus NL-Luc-1549 (B) and induced luciferase levels were measured a further 48 h later. Doubly NL-H1-transduced MDM served as the negative control (NEG). The average of three experiments and the standard deviation are indicated.
|
|
|
|---|
While we and others have previously reported excellent protection against HIV-1 and other viruses in cell lines and primary cells in culture (2, 5, 11, 12, 15, 18, 19, 23, 33, 36, 41, 44, 50), the approach used, i.e., primarily transfection of siRNA duplexes, gives rise to only transient inhibition. To address this concern, we have developed a simple lentivirus vector that can effectively and stably express siRNAs at a level sufficient to block HIV-1 replication in culture (Fig. 1). Although the pNL-SIN-CMV-BLR vector may not be sufficiently defective to be suitable for use in humans, these data nevertheless provide proof of principle for the concept that stable expression of siRNAs, and hence a stable antiviral phenotype, can be achieved with lentivirus vectors or other viral vectors.
A second concern noted above is the issue of viral variability and the resultant ability of viruses to escape inhibition by siRNAs targeted to even highly conserved regions in the viral genome. While it might, in principle, be possible to design siRNAs targeted to multiple critical viral sequences that, in combination, would provide long-term protection, a possible alternative strategy is to target a cellular gene product that is essential for virus replication but dispensable to the host. The human ccr5 gene provides an ideal example of such a target, as it is critical for infection by most primary HIV-1 isolates yet apparently of little or no importance to the human host (25, 38).
With the lentivirus vector siRNA expression strategy, we were indeed able to effectively and specifically reduce CCR5 protein and mRNA expression in transduced cells (Fig. 5). More importantly, this approach allowed us to selectively inhibit infection by R5-tropic, but not X4-tropic, HIV-1 isolates of not only cell lines but also primary macrophages (Fig. 5B and 6). These data therefore confirm and extend the recent report by Qin et al. (35) showing that a lentivirus-expressed siRNA targeted to CCR5 can inhibit infection of primary T cells by R5-tropic HIV-1. Together, these reports suggest that this strategy has the potential to block HIV-1 infection in vivo in a manner that cannot be overcome simply by a 1- or 2-nt change in the viral siRNA target sequence (12). Of course, HIV-1 might still be able to escape this inhibitory effect by switching to another coreceptor, such as CXCR4 (25, 38). While this certainly represents a serious concern, we note that it may also be possible to simultaneously knock down CXCR4 expression in adult patients with RNAi without serious side effects for the host and to thereby preclude this avenue of viral escape (29).
Although the focus of this report has been the potential of lentivirus siRNA expression vectors for rendering cells nonpermissive for HIV-1 replication, these vectors also have the potential to induce the stable knockdown of important cellular genes unrelated to the HIV-1 life cycle in either cultured cells or experimental animals (39, 42, 47). We therefore intend to make the pNL-SIN-CMV-BLR lentivirus vector, as well as a variant expressing gfp in place of blr, available to academic researchers on request.
We thank Timothy M. Clay and Michael A. Morse for assistance in the isolation of primary human macrophages.
This work was supported in part by grant AI42538 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and by a travel grant from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, both to B.R.C.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»